SOT - Multi-dimensional tree diagrams

2011-09-26 Thread Kevin Parker

Has anyone seen anything similar to this that is open source that can be
driven from a database and/or XML- thank you!!!

http://asterisq.com/


++
Kevin Parker
Advanced Imaging

e: webmas...@advancedimaging.com.au
w: www.advancedimaging.com.au
m: 0418 815 527

++

http://au.linkedin.com/in/krparker



~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:347696
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Way OT - Technical Writing

2011-09-26 Thread Brook Davies

Sorry for the way OT post. But I am going crazy trying to find a good
technical writer to write a user guide for our CF web app. I've gone through
a few people already. They keep writing stuff that seems to make the topics
MORE difficult. I think I would pull my hair out trying to use what they are
writing.

 

I suspect the people on this list have had to hire technical writers at one
point or another. Does anyone have a good technical writer they use for
projects that they want to refer to me???  I would be so grateful. 



Brook

 




~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:347697
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: Ecommerce - need it to allow vendors to manage their own inventory sections - any recommendations?

2011-09-26 Thread Mary Jo Sminkey

The best test is to try both and see if your app works on them without
issue, and then look at their unique features.


Of course, there *is* information out there in terms of what they don't support 
that ACF does, you don't have to go to the trouble of running your app to find 
that out. Here's some Railo information:

http://wiki.getrailo.org/wiki/Tags_Not_Supported


Mary Jo 

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:347698
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: Ecommerce - need it to allow vendors to manage their own inventory sections - any recommendations?

2011-09-26 Thread Mary Jo Sminkey

The best test is to try both and see if your app works on them without
issue, and then look at their unique features.

And unsupported functions:

http://wiki.getrailo.org/wiki/Functions_Not_Supported


Not sure if this is comprehensive, and you'd still want to test your app, but 
this is a good starting point to see if you are using anything that is known to 
not work. 


Mary Jo

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:347699
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


coldfusion

2011-09-26 Thread Greg Morphis

We have a server that has 2 urls pointing to it..
If I log in servera.org and then hit some log in required page and then
change the url to serverb.org I'm told to log in.. Does CF think it's a
different application? different session? And is there an easy way to
correct this?


~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:347700
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Does coldfusion see 2 urls as different applications or sessions?

2011-09-26 Thread Greg Morphis

Sorry for the horrible subject before.. I began writing it, wrote the body
and before I went back to append the subject I hit send..


On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 9:25 AM, Greg Morphis gmorp...@gmail.com wrote:

 We have a server that has 2 urls pointing to it..
 If I log in servera.org and then hit some log in required page and then
 change the url to serverb.org I'm told to log in.. Does CF think it's a
 different application? different session? And is there an easy way to
 correct this?



~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:347701
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: Does coldfusion see 2 urls as different applications or sessions?

2011-09-26 Thread Russ Michaels

yes because cookies are domain specific and that is how your session
is identified unless you are manually passing cfid and cftoken on the
url.

On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Greg Morphis gmorp...@gmail.com wrote:

 Sorry for the horrible subject before.. I began writing it, wrote the body
 and before I went back to append the subject I hit send..


 On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 9:25 AM, Greg Morphis gmorp...@gmail.com wrote:

 We have a server that has 2 urls pointing to it..
 If I log in servera.org and then hit some log in required page and then
 change the url to serverb.org I'm told to log in.. Does CF think it's a
 different application? different session? And is there an easy way to
 correct this?



 

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:347702
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: Does coldfusion see 2 urls as different applications or sessions?

2011-09-26 Thread Alan Rother

Just to add on specific point of clarification

ColdFusion bases it's decision about Application scopes entirely on the name
of the application.

So as long as in your Application.cfc this.name is the same no matter what
domain name you hit, then CF is referencing the same application variables.

ex. cfset this.name = mywebsite_Public_08242011_1311

If you use part of the domain name to set your Application Name, then they
have different application scopes.

ex cfset this.name = #ListFirst(cgi.server_name,
'.')#_Public_08242011_1311

But as Russ pointed out, you are setting domain specific session cookies, so
if you jump from domainA.com to domainB.com your browser won't know you are
on the same site and will not send your session cookies from A to B.

=]

-- 
Alan Rother
Manager, Phoenix Cold Fusion User Group, www.AZCFUG.org
Twitter: @AlanRother


~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:347703
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: ColdFusion Standard License

2011-09-26 Thread Mary Jo Sminkey

 Not sure if this is comprehensive, and you'd still want to test your 
 app, but this is a good starting point to see if you are using 
 anything that is known to not work. 

Oops, sorry about the messed up subject. Didn't realize LastPass was filling 
that in from the last thread I replied to online. 


Mary Jo 

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:347704
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Executing Java in CF

2011-09-26 Thread Robert Harrison

Hi,

I'm having no luck finding this documentation, maybe someone know off the top 
of their head.   I have some server sided java code I need to execute in a 
coldfusion page. That may call either a .war or .jar file. 

How do I specify in the CF page that a portion of the code is JAVA?

Thanks,
Robert



Robert B. Harrison
Director of Interactive Services
Austin  Williams
125 Kennedy Drive, Suite 100 
Hauppauge NY 11788
P : 631.231.6600 Ext. 119 
F : 631.434.7022
http://www.austin-williams.com 

Great advertising can't be either/or.  It must be .

Plug in to our blog: AW Unplugged
http://www.austin-williams.com/unplugged


~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:347705
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: Does coldfusion see 2 urls as different applications or sessions?

2011-09-26 Thread Greg Morphis

Cool, that's what I was assuming was happening, the domain name difference
in the session cookies but wasn't sure how to search for that.. figured
asking people would be the best way. Thanks guys!

On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Alan Rother alan.rot...@gmail.com wrote:


 Just to add on specific point of clarification

 ColdFusion bases it's decision about Application scopes entirely on the
 name
 of the application.

 So as long as in your Application.cfc this.name is the same no matter what
 domain name you hit, then CF is referencing the same application variables.

 ex. cfset this.name = mywebsite_Public_08242011_1311

 If you use part of the domain name to set your Application Name, then they
 have different application scopes.

 ex cfset this.name = #ListFirst(cgi.server_name,
 '.')#_Public_08242011_1311

 But as Russ pointed out, you are setting domain specific session cookies,
 so
 if you jump from domainA.com to domainB.com your browser won't know you are
 on the same site and will not send your session cookies from A to B.

 =]

 --
 Alan Rother
 Manager, Phoenix Cold Fusion User Group, www.AZCFUG.org
 Twitter: @AlanRother


 

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:347706
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


SQL need to return data even if specific where statement isnt matched

2011-09-26 Thread Adam Bourg

've built an extension to a employment application where we can easily add new 
questions to the form. I need to query to match on both which job they applied 
to and what application ID it is. I need to return both the answer and the 
question, the problem is it will return both if both are defined, but I need it 
to return the question, even if the application isn't defined, but right now 
it'll only return the question if the answer is defined.

Please help!

Code: (Note the where uses a Coldfusion variable, so nothing out of the normal)

SELECT 
dbo.mod_employmentAppQuestionAnswers.questionID 
,dbo.mod_employmentAppQuestionAnswers.questionDefinitionID 
,dbo.mod_employmentAppQuestionAnswers.AppID 
,dbo.mod_employmentAppQuestionAnswers.questionText 
,dbo.mod_employmentAppQuestionAnswers.questionDate1 
,dbo.mod_employmentAppQuestionAnswers.questionDate2 
,dbo.mod_employmentAppQuestionAnswers.questionBit 
,dbo.mod_employmentAppQuestionDefinitions.definitionID 
,dbo.mod_employmentAppQuestionDefinitions.jobTitleID 
,dbo.mod_employmentAppQuestionDefinitions.title AS QuestionTitle 
,dbo.mod_employmentAppQuestionDefinitions.questionTypeID 
,dbo.mod_employmentAppQuestionDefinitions.description 
,dbo.mod_employmentAppQuestionDefinitions.isActive 
,dbo.mod_employmentAppJobTitles.title AS JobTitle 
,dbo.mod_employmentAppQuestionTypes.type AS QuestionType
FROM dbo.mod_employmentAppQuestionAnswers 
FULL JOIN dbo.mod_employmentAppQuestionDefinitions 
ON dbo.mod_employmentAppQuestionAnswers.questionDefinitionID = 
dbo.mod_employmentAppQuestionDefinitions.definitionID 
INNER JOIN dbo.mod_employmentAppJobTitles 
ON dbo.mod_employmentAppQuestionDefinitions.jobTitleID = 
dbo.mod_employmentAppJobTitles.jobTitleID 
LEFT JOIN dbo.mod_employmentAppQuestionTypes 
ON dbo.mod_employmentAppQuestionDefinitions.questionTypeID = 
dbo.mod_employmentAppQuestionTypes.questionTypeID
WHERE   
(dbo.mod_employmentAppQuestionDefinitions.jobTitleID = 
cfqueryparam cfsqltype=cf_sql_integer value=#jobTitleID# 
/) AND
(dbo.mod_employmentAppQuestionAnswers.AppID = 
cfqueryparam cfsqltype=cf_sql_integer 
value=#applicationID# /) 

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:347707
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: Executing Java in CF

2011-09-26 Thread Russ Michaels

make sure the java class files are loaded by CF, stick them in the lib
folder for example then restart cf, then check in the cf info page in
the cfadmin and see if they loaded, then you will be able to call the
functions using CreateObject(java) just as u would any of the built in
java functions.

On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Robert Harrison
rob...@austin-williams.com wrote:

 Hi,

 I'm having no luck finding this documentation, maybe someone know off the top 
 of their head.   I have some server sided java code I need to execute in a 
 coldfusion page. That may call either a .war or .jar file.

 How do I specify in the CF page that a portion of the code is JAVA?

 Thanks,
 Robert



 Robert B. Harrison
 Director of Interactive Services
 Austin  Williams
 125 Kennedy Drive, Suite 100
 Hauppauge NY 11788
 P : 631.231.6600 Ext. 119
 F : 631.434.7022
 http://www.austin-williams.com

 Great advertising can't be either/or.  It must be .

 Plug in to our blog: AW Unplugged
 http://www.austin-williams.com/unplugged


 

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:347708
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: coldfusion

2011-09-26 Thread Bryan Stevenson

It sure will see them as seperate appsbecause they are ;-)

That's all I have until you tell us if:

1) The app on each server is in fact the same (I assume so)
2) You setup load balancing between the 2 servers and expect the app to
be seen as the same on each server

If the answer to 1  2 is yes, then I'd say you have a problem.

Cheers

On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 09:25 -0500, Greg Morphis wrote:

 We have a server that has 2 urls pointing to it..
 If I log in servera.org and then hit some log in required page and then
 change the url to serverb.org I'm told to log in.. Does CF think it's a
 different application? different session? And is there an easy way to
 correct this?
 
 
 

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:347709
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: coldfusion

2011-09-26 Thread Al Musella, DPM

This might not apply to your situation, but I have a few domain names 
that lead to my same website (.com. .org as well as common mispelling).
  What I do is detect the name used and redirect to the main domain 
name when they first hit the website


At 12:01 PM 9/26/2011, you wrote:

It sure will see them as seperate appsbecause they are ;-)

That's all I have until you tell us if:

1) The app on each server is in fact the same (I assume so)
2) You setup load balancing between the 2 servers and expect the app to
be seen as the same on each server

If the answer to 1  2 is yes, then I'd say you have a problem.

Cheers

On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 09:25 -0500, Greg Morphis wrote:

  We have a server that has 2 urls pointing to it..
  If I log in servera.org and then hit some log in required page and then
  change the url to serverb.org I'm told to log in.. Does CF think it's a
  different application? different session? And is there an easy way to
  correct this?
 
 
 



~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:347710
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


SQL grrr

2011-09-26 Thread Richard White

Hi,

i know this is probably a simple answer and i probably drunk too much coffee!

given the following sql data:

ID  value

1   A
1   B
1   C
2   A
2   B
3   A
3   B
3   C

i need to run a query that says return me the ids that are linked to values A 
and B and C.
so this query on the above data would return IDs 1 and 3

thanks :)

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:347711
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: ORM overhead

2011-09-26 Thread Richard White

to rephrase this question slightly, has there been much take up on the CF9 ORM? 
i read somewhere it was one of the most welcome enhancements in CF9, but then i 
also read somewhere else its an overhead too far for many developers



 Hi, we are looking to restructure our system using ORM but are 
 wondering:
 
 firstly, about the general overhead of the CF9 ORM?
 
 secondly, the overhead in terms of the following scenario:
 
 Our application is generalized and customizes itself and its database 
 around users requirements. The users login to one central application 
 but each client has their own database. So after logging in the system 
 knows which database to use.
 
 Therefore, it appears we will have to configure ORM to setup an 
 instance for each individual client. This could obviously spiral into 
 the thousands.
 
 Would appreciate your feedback
 
 thanks 

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:347712
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: SQL grrr

2011-09-26 Thread Matt Quackenbush

Something like...

SELECT
  ID
FROM
  MyTable
WHERE
  value IN (cfqueryparam cfsqltype=cf_sql_varchar
value=#myList# list=true /)
;

??

On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Richard White rich...@j7is.co.uk wrote:


 Hi,

 i know this is probably a simple answer and i probably drunk too much
 coffee!

 given the following sql data:

 ID  value
 
 1   A
 1   B
 1   C
 2   A
 2   B
 3   A
 3   B
 3   C

 i need to run a query that says return me the ids that are linked to values
 A and B and C.
 so this query on the above data would return IDs 1 and 3

 thanks :)

 

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:347713
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: SQL grrr

2011-09-26 Thread Leigh

 ids that are linked to values A and B and C.


If you mean only ID's linked to all three (3) values?  Something like this 


cfset distinctValues = A,B,C
...

SELECT  ID, COUNT(Value) AS MatchCount
FROM TableName
WHERE   ID IN ( cfqueryparam value=#distinctValues# list=true 
cfsqltype=cf_sql_varchar ) HAVING  COUNT(Value) = cfqueryparam 
value=#listLen(distinctValues)# cfsqltype=cf_sql_

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:347714
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: SQL grrr

2011-09-26 Thread Carl Von Stetten

Richard,

I think this will work (untested, assumes SQL Server):

select t.ID
from mytable t
inner join mytable a on t.id = a.id and a.value = 'A'
inner join mytable b on t.id = b.id and b.value = 'B'
inner join mytable c on t.id = c.id and c.value = 'C'

HTH,
Carl

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:347715
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: SQL grrr

2011-09-26 Thread Steve Milburn

I'm sure there is a much more efficient way of doing this, but this would
work:

SELECT distinct ID from table where id in
(select ID from table where val = 'A' and id in
(select id from table where val = 'B' and ID in
(select id from table where val = 'C')))


On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Richard White rich...@j7is.co.uk wrote:


 Hi,

 i know this is probably a simple answer and i probably drunk too much
 coffee!

 given the following sql data:

 ID  value
 
 1   A
 1   B
 1   C
 2   A
 2   B
 3   A
 3   B
 3   C

 i need to run a query that says return me the ids that are linked to values
 A and B and C.
 so this query on the above data would return IDs 1 and 3

 thanks :)

 

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:347716
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: SQL grrr

2011-09-26 Thread Josh Nathanson

Yup, I think Carl's is the best, though you'd probably want to throw a GROUP
BY in there so you don't get multiple rows for the same ID.

-- Josh

On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Carl Von Stetten
vonner.li...@vonner.netwrote:


 Richard,

 I think this will work (untested, assumes SQL Server):

 select t.ID
 from mytable t
 inner join mytable a on t.id = a.id and a.value = 'A'
 inner join mytable b on t.id = b.id and b.value = 'B'
 inner join mytable c on t.id = c.id and c.value = 'C'

 HTH,
 Carl

 

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:347717
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: SQL grrr

2011-09-26 Thread Carl Von Stetten

Or change the first line to:

select distinct t.ID (again assumes SQL Server)

Carl

On 9/26/2011 10:44 AM, Josh Nathanson wrote:
 Yup, I think Carl's is the best, though you'd probably want to throw a GROUP
 BY in there so you don't get multiple rows for the same ID.

 -- Josh

 On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Carl Von Stetten
 vonner.li...@vonner.netwrote:

 Richard,

 I think this will work (untested, assumes SQL Server):

 select t.ID
 from mytable t
 inner join mytable a on t.id = a.id and a.value = 'A'
 inner join mytable b on t.id = b.id and b.value = 'B'
 inner join mytable c on t.id = c.id and c.value = 'C'

 HTH,
 Carl


 

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:347718
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: ORM overhead

2011-09-26 Thread Brian Kotek

You're not going to get anything other than anecdotal opinions, but everyone
I know switched to ORM as soon as it was available.

As far as overhead, I'm not sure what you mean. Coding overhead?
Performance overhead?


On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Richard White rich...@j7is.co.uk wrote:


 to rephrase this question slightly, has there been much take up on the CF9
 ORM? i read somewhere it was one of the most welcome enhancements in CF9,
 but then i also read somewhere else its an overhead too far for many
 developers



  Hi, we are looking to restructure our system using ORM but are
  wondering:
 
  firstly, about the general overhead of the CF9 ORM?
 
  secondly, the overhead in terms of the following scenario:
 
  Our application is generalized and customizes itself and its database
  around users requirements. The users login to one central application
  but each client has their own database. So after logging in the system
  knows which database to use.
 
  Therefore, it appears we will have to configure ORM to setup an
  instance for each individual client. This could obviously spiral into
  the thousands.
 
  Would appreciate your feedback
 
  thanks

 

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:347719
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: SQL grrr

2011-09-26 Thread Richard White

thanks, works perfect!

 Hi,
 
 i know this is probably a simple answer and i probably drunk too much 
 coffee!
 
 given the following sql data:
 
 ID  value
 
 1   A
 1   B
 1   C
 2   A
 2   B
 3   A
 3   B
 3   C
 
 i need to run a query that says return me the ids that are linked to 
 values A and B and C.
 so this query on the above data would return IDs 1 and 3
 
 thanks 
:) 

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:347720
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: SQL grrr

2011-09-26 Thread Leigh

 If you mean only ID's linked to all three (3) values?  Something like this 


Duh. Just noticed I left off the GROUP BY...

 
cfset distinctValues = A,B,C 
...

SELECT  ID, COUNT(Value) AS MatchCount
FROM TableName
WHERE   
ID IN ( cfqueryparam value=#distinctValues# list=true 
cfsqltype=cf_sql_varchar )
GROUP BY ID
 HAVING  COUNT(Value) = cfqueryparam
 value=#listLen(distinctValues)# cfsqltype=cf_sql_integer

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:347721
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


RE: ORM overhead

2011-09-26 Thread Richard (J7 Group)

Performance overhead, especially in an application that could be linked to
thousands of data sources?



-Original Message-
From: Brian Kotek [mailto:brian...@gmail.com] 
Sent: 26 September 2011 18:49
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: ORM overhead


You're not going to get anything other than anecdotal opinions, but everyone
I know switched to ORM as soon as it was available.

As far as overhead, I'm not sure what you mean. Coding overhead?
Performance overhead?


On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Richard White rich...@j7is.co.uk wrote:


 to rephrase this question slightly, has there been much take up on the CF9
 ORM? i read somewhere it was one of the most welcome enhancements in CF9,
 but then i also read somewhere else its an overhead too far for many
 developers



  Hi, we are looking to restructure our system using ORM but are
  wondering:
 
  firstly, about the general overhead of the CF9 ORM?
 
  secondly, the overhead in terms of the following scenario:
 
  Our application is generalized and customizes itself and its database
  around users requirements. The users login to one central application
  but each client has their own database. So after logging in the system
  knows which database to use.
 
  Therefore, it appears we will have to configure ORM to setup an
  instance for each individual client. This could obviously spiral into
  the thousands.
 
  Would appreciate your feedback
 
  thanks

 



~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:347722
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: Executing Java in CF

2011-09-26 Thread Larry Lyons

make sure the java class files are loaded by CF, stick them in the lib
folder for example then restart cf, then check in the cf info page in
the cfadmin and see if they loaded, then you will be able to call the
functions using CreateObject(java) just as u would any of the built in
java functions.



Also don't forget that there is the javaloader cfc. It lets you put the class 
library wherever you want it without restarting cf.

http://www.compoundtheory.com/?action=displayPostID=117 

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:347723
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


cfquickdocs.com down?

2011-09-26 Thread Kumar Shah

http://cfquickdocs.com/ seems to be down (since yesterday) I believe.

Anybody know who maintained this/can reach out to them? Has proved to be
really useful for looking things up.

Thanks
-- 
Kumar Shah
http://www.coldfusion-ria.com/Blog/


~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:347724
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: ORM overhead

2011-09-26 Thread Jochem van Dieten

On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Richard (J7 Group) wrote:
 Performance overhead, especially in an application that could be linked to
 thousands of data sources?

I think an application with thousands of datasources is so far out of
the experience of other users that we will have no way of answering
your question. I do have a few questions that may be helpful in
finding the right questions and answers yourself.

1. What would you consider an acceptable overhead in terms of GB of RAM?
2. What would you consider an acceptable overhead ni terms of seconds
delay of application startup?

Once you have answered that, run the following experiment:
1. For one database, generate the CFCs for the tables using a code
generator (such as the plugin to CF Builder).
2. Add the database to the orm configuration in application.cfc
3. Add the CFC folder to the orm configuration in application.cfc.
4. Measure startup time.
5. Repeat step 1-3 for 9 more databases.
6. Measure startup time.
7. Extrapolate.

With thousands of datasources even a small number of tables per
datasource means on startup CF has to compile and process tens or even
hundreds of thousands of CFCs to build all the right relations and
objects. I expect that to be prohibitively expensive on startup time
(question 2) long before you have a problem with RAM (question1), even
if you use HBMXML files to store the relations. Since my experience
does not go further then close to 200 tables in one application I have
no idea what the result will be and am very interested in what your
measurements will tell.

Jochem

-- 
Jochem van Dieten
http://jochem.vandieten.net/

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:347725
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: WSDL 404 Error

2011-09-26 Thread Shannon Rhodes

Thanks all...it seems to have magically resolved itself after some server 
maintenance this weekend.  I appeciate the help! 

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:347726
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


RE: ORM overhead

2011-09-26 Thread Richard (J7 Group)

Thanks for your reply Jochem.

This is some excellent advice and we will def look into it. 

I wonder if I am over complicating this issue. Basically our application is
a Software as a Service (SaaS) and each client that accesses it really only
needs to connect to their own data source due to the type of data our
application processes... and regulations in the industry say their data must
be separated. 

So, the actual objects in the database may vary but only *very* slightly.
The only real issue we have here is not that the objects will vary but how
do I get ORM to point to purely a different data source name - but use the
same set of objects.

 




-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:joch...@gmail.com] 
Sent: 26 September 2011 20:22
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: ORM overhead


On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Richard (J7 Group) wrote:
 Performance overhead, especially in an application that could be linked to
 thousands of data sources?

I think an application with thousands of datasources is so far out of
the experience of other users that we will have no way of answering
your question. I do have a few questions that may be helpful in
finding the right questions and answers yourself.

1. What would you consider an acceptable overhead in terms of GB of RAM?
2. What would you consider an acceptable overhead ni terms of seconds
delay of application startup?

Once you have answered that, run the following experiment:
1. For one database, generate the CFCs for the tables using a code
generator (such as the plugin to CF Builder).
2. Add the database to the orm configuration in application.cfc
3. Add the CFC folder to the orm configuration in application.cfc.
4. Measure startup time.
5. Repeat step 1-3 for 9 more databases.
6. Measure startup time.
7. Extrapolate.

With thousands of datasources even a small number of tables per
datasource means on startup CF has to compile and process tens or even
hundreds of thousands of CFCs to build all the right relations and
objects. I expect that to be prohibitively expensive on startup time
(question 2) long before you have a problem with RAM (question1), even
if you use HBMXML files to store the relations. Since my experience
does not go further then close to 200 tables in one application I have
no idea what the result will be and am very interested in what your
measurements will tell.

Jochem

-- 
Jochem van Dieten
http://jochem.vandieten.net/



~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:347727
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: ORM overhead

2011-09-26 Thread Russ Michaels

It is a pretty easy test.
make 2 pages.

1 that uses cfquery
1 that uses ORM

get them both to do the same heavy database work
compare the execution times.

ORM is clearly going to have some overhead by its very nature, so you
have to measure whether the convenience and portability outweighs the
performance hit.

ORM has multiple uses, it is a RAD framework the same as CFML allowing
you to do complex tasks easily without underlying knowledge of the
database structure, it also creates portability so that the same code
will work on multiple database platforms.
For many ORM removes too much control as you are limited to the
confines of what ORM can do so you may find yourself unable to do
certain complex or dynamic queries without dropping back into regular
SQL.
There is also the fact that you are moving all your data abstraction
into the application layer, the stored proc advocates who prefer to
keep data abstraction within the database would say this is a bad
thing.

It is really a case of weighing up the pros and cons of each method
and choosing which best suits you and your application. It you are
concerned with squeezing every cycle of speed and performance out of
your app, then ORM is probably not for you.
But overall I would say that most developers use CFML because of its
RAD speed and convenience, so ORM is really just an extension of that
so the performance hit is acceptable.

On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 8:50 PM, Richard (J7 Group) rich...@j7is.co.uk wrote:

 Thanks for your reply Jochem.

 This is some excellent advice and we will def look into it.

 I wonder if I am over complicating this issue. Basically our application is
 a Software as a Service (SaaS) and each client that accesses it really only
 needs to connect to their own data source due to the type of data our
 application processes... and regulations in the industry say their data must
 be separated.

 So, the actual objects in the database may vary but only *very* slightly.
 The only real issue we have here is not that the objects will vary but how
 do I get ORM to point to purely a different data source name - but use the
 same set of objects.






 -Original Message-
 From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:joch...@gmail.com]
 Sent: 26 September 2011 20:22
 To: cf-talk
 Subject: Re: ORM overhead


 On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Richard (J7 Group) wrote:
 Performance overhead, especially in an application that could be linked to
 thousands of data sources?

 I think an application with thousands of datasources is so far out of
 the experience of other users that we will have no way of answering
 your question. I do have a few questions that may be helpful in
 finding the right questions and answers yourself.

 1. What would you consider an acceptable overhead in terms of GB of RAM?
 2. What would you consider an acceptable overhead ni terms of seconds
 delay of application startup?

 Once you have answered that, run the following experiment:
 1. For one database, generate the CFCs for the tables using a code
 generator (such as the plugin to CF Builder).
 2. Add the database to the orm configuration in application.cfc
 3. Add the CFC folder to the orm configuration in application.cfc.
 4. Measure startup time.
 5. Repeat step 1-3 for 9 more databases.
 6. Measure startup time.
 7. Extrapolate.

 With thousands of datasources even a small number of tables per
 datasource means on startup CF has to compile and process tens or even
 hundreds of thousands of CFCs to build all the right relations and
 objects. I expect that to be prohibitively expensive on startup time
 (question 2) long before you have a problem with RAM (question1), even
 if you use HBMXML files to store the relations. Since my experience
 does not go further then close to 200 tables in one application I have
 no idea what the result will be and am very interested in what your
 measurements will tell.

 Jochem

 --
 Jochem van Dieten
 http://jochem.vandieten.net/



 

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:347728
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Developer Edition License Exception and Windows 7

2011-09-26 Thread Scott Brady

This just started happening on Friday, so not sure if it's Windows
7-specific or not (I've been on 7 for a couple of months), but now it's
getting annoying (4-5 times today already).

I'm running across a problem with the Dev edition saying there's a license
restriction exception.  No one else has been hitting my machine, but it
seems like Windows is hitting CF with 3 different IP addresses.  The
exception lists the one it's trying to use (an IPv4 address) and the two
that it's already tied to (two different IPv6 addresses).

One of the v6 and the v4 address are tied to my wireless connection, and the
other v6 is tied to my ethernet connection.  I suppose I could disconnect
the wireless (I've never figured out why it seems like Windows gives
wireless precedence over a hard-wired connection), but I was wondering if
there was something else I could do.  I'm getting really tired of restarting
CF (my computer isn't exactly over-powered and the app can be slow to start
up, so it kills 10-15 minutes of productivity every time).

So, short of disabling the wireless connection, is there something else I
could do?

Scott

-- 
-
Scott Brady
http://www.scottbrady.net/


~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:347729
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: ORM overhead

2011-09-26 Thread Brian Kotek

Generally, the performance is perfectly acceptable. In your specific case
though, I'm not sure, because a situation where you have thousands of
separate databases for the same application is definitely not common.


On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Richard (J7 Group) rich...@j7is.co.ukwrote:


 Performance overhead, especially in an application that could be linked to
 thousands of data sources?



 -Original Message-
 From: Brian Kotek [mailto:brian...@gmail.com]
 Sent: 26 September 2011 18:49
 To: cf-talk
 Subject: Re: ORM overhead


 You're not going to get anything other than anecdotal opinions, but
 everyone
 I know switched to ORM as soon as it was available.

 As far as overhead, I'm not sure what you mean. Coding overhead?
 Performance overhead?


 On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Richard White rich...@j7is.co.uk wrote:

 
  to rephrase this question slightly, has there been much take up on the
 CF9
  ORM? i read somewhere it was one of the most welcome enhancements in CF9,
  but then i also read somewhere else its an overhead too far for many
  developers
 
 
 
   Hi, we are looking to restructure our system using ORM but are
   wondering:
  
   firstly, about the general overhead of the CF9 ORM?
  
   secondly, the overhead in terms of the following scenario:
  
   Our application is generalized and customizes itself and its database
   around users requirements. The users login to one central application
   but each client has their own database. So after logging in the system
   knows which database to use.
  
   Therefore, it appears we will have to configure ORM to setup an
   instance for each individual client. This could obviously spiral into
   the thousands.
  
   Would appreciate your feedback
  
   thanks
 
 



 

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:347730
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: ORM overhead

2011-09-26 Thread Brian Kotek

There is also the first and second-level cache to consider, as these affect
performance tremendously, and aren't reflected in a very basic test like
this.

On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Russ Michaels r...@michaels.me.uk wrote:


 It is a pretty easy test.
 make 2 pages.

 1 that uses cfquery
 1 that uses ORM

 get them both to do the same heavy database work
 compare the execution times.

 ORM is clearly going to have some overhead by its very nature, so you
 have to measure whether the convenience and portability outweighs the
 performance hit.




~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:347731
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: Developer Edition License Exception and Windows 7

2011-09-26 Thread Russ Michaels

just disable IPv6 if your not using it.
Also it should work on 127.0.0.1 regardless, so check your hosts file
and make sure localhost and all your local dev domains map to
127.0.0.1



On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Scott Brady dsbr...@gmail.com wrote:

 This just started happening on Friday, so not sure if it's Windows
 7-specific or not (I've been on 7 for a couple of months), but now it's
 getting annoying (4-5 times today already).

 I'm running across a problem with the Dev edition saying there's a license
 restriction exception.  No one else has been hitting my machine, but it
 seems like Windows is hitting CF with 3 different IP addresses.  The
 exception lists the one it's trying to use (an IPv4 address) and the two
 that it's already tied to (two different IPv6 addresses).

 One of the v6 and the v4 address are tied to my wireless connection, and the
 other v6 is tied to my ethernet connection.  I suppose I could disconnect
 the wireless (I've never figured out why it seems like Windows gives
 wireless precedence over a hard-wired connection), but I was wondering if
 there was something else I could do.  I'm getting really tired of restarting
 CF (my computer isn't exactly over-powered and the app can be slow to start
 up, so it kills 10-15 minutes of productivity every time).

 So, short of disabling the wireless connection, is there something else I
 could do?

 Scott

 --
 -
 Scott Brady
 http://www.scottbrady.net/


 

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:347732
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: cfquickdocs.com down?

2011-09-26 Thread Josh Nathanson

Through some digging I was able to connect it to Jacob Munson, who I believe
is on this list, or at least was at one time.  Jake you out there??  We need
CFQuickDocs!

-- Josh



On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Kumar Shah shahku...@gmail.com wrote:


 http://cfquickdocs.com/ seems to be down (since yesterday) I believe.

 Anybody know who maintained this/can reach out to them? Has proved to be
 really useful for looking things up.

 Thanks
 --
 Kumar Shah
 http://www.coldfusion-ria.com/Blog/


 

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:347733
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: cfquickdocs.com down?

2011-09-26 Thread Alan Rother

If you guys ever get hold of him, I'd be happy to act as a mirror.

It would be nice to have a few of those out there...


=]

On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Josh Nathanson joshnathan...@gmail.comwrote:


 Through some digging I was able to connect it to Jacob Munson, who I
 believe
 is on this list, or at least was at one time.  Jake you out there??  We
 need
 CFQuickDocs!

 -- Josh



 On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Kumar Shah shahku...@gmail.com wrote:

 
  http://cfquickdocs.com/ seems to be down (since yesterday) I believe.
 
  Anybody know who maintained this/can reach out to them? Has proved to be
  really useful for looking things up.
 
  Thanks
  --
  Kumar Shah
  http://www.coldfusion-ria.com/Blog/
 
 
 

 

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:347734
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm