[freenet-chat] PGP signatures
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Could people just kind of post thier PGP signatures here? It would be nice to have a list of everyone's PGP signatures under one subject. Or you could just put your PGP signature on all your messages. :) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP Personal Privacy 6.5.2 iQA/AwUBOvwvuib1Cbdz0HdeEQKLSgCfcrZI9pHYSU2nDWezIGlw0l3MLY0An2Sp pLJ40ybrzotxGftg5g6mIcES =58SR -END PGP SIGNATURE- GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO! Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less! Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj. ___ Chat mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/chat
Re: [freenet-chat] Legal vulnerabilities (was: JRE License)
On Thu, 10 May 2001 19:45:02 -0400 Greg Wooledge [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Aaron P Ingebrigtsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Bush is about to cross the line with his activities. Soon he may actualy hurt some or many americans, maybe even kill them. In what way would this be new? The US government kills its citizens all the time, many of them in the name of the War on Drugs. Since this War is being carried out by the agencies of the executive branch, the president is responsible for it. Ah, but the President is not all powerfull. If he tries his best to stop the drug war, then I cannot fault him on that. But if he supports it, or does nothing to stop it, then yes, he is at least partialy at fault. (And don't even think for a moment that it's acceptable because the people who are murdered are just drug users. Many of the people killed weren't even drug users; they were innocent people who just happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. You can find several incidents with a properly worded web search -- the first one I stumbled across was the death of Patrick Dorismond, http://www.cato.org/dailys/04-07-00.html.) Oh I don't think it is acceptable even if they are just drug users. Drug Users are not the true criminals in the drug war, it is the government and the big drug cartels who are the true criminals. I think it is totaly wrong that bounty hunters have the powers of police, but none of the checks and balances that keep them in line. A bounty hunter can just break into your house without knocking, or anouncing themselves, without any warrants for entry, searching, or arrest, and you cannot legaly do anything to protect yourself or your home from them. It is totaly wrong in every way that I can think of. Putting up a bounty for someone is the same as putting out a mob hit on someone. Only it is somehow more legal because it is the government that does it. http://www.stopthedrugwar.org/ http://www.drcnet.org/ http://www.cato.org/ I fully support stopping the drug war. GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO! Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less! Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj. ___ Chat mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/chat
Re: [freenet-chat] David and Aaron!
On Thu, 10 May 2001 19:22:20 -0400 frankg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ATTENTION: David McNab and Aaron P Ingebrigtsen Do freenetproject.org a favor and keep your pirate warez chit chat OFF this list. Don't post links to pirated software here. Here is David McNab advising node operators to 'take precautions', and in the next sentence he's giving out a link to pirated software on a public mailing list. Brilliant. Any other sage security advice? Why? They have all the facts they need to launch an attack against freenet, simply because of the nature of freenet. Not even because of the stuff you can get on freenet. How is talking only about the good things on freenet going to change that? It won't. As for advertiseing pirated software on a public email list, that is a risk the advertiser takes. We all know this. By saying you have pirated software in public, you take the risk of being hunted down and punished by the government. It is not your risk, nor freenet's, but David's and anyone else's who chooses to do what David did. And anyone who sais that they are haveing trouble with PGP Disk, such as I have, is not necessarily saying that they have pirated software. Did I say I downloaded and installed pirated software? No. How do you know that I haven't purchased it? You don't, do you? Do you have to give proof of purchase for a piece of software before you can talk about that piece of software? I sure hope not, that would be a huge pain in the neck. Most of my software is shareware, freeware, or purchased. I freely admit here and now that I do have abandonware. If I go down in flames for haveing Doom or something, oh well. As for pirated software, well, if I can't pay for it because I have no money, then I'm not STEALING money from the authors of the programs. If I do get enough money to pay my debt I will concider any pirated software I have to be part of that debt and will pay for them. Otherwise, I can't pay when I have no money, so, back off. If I get arrested and imprisoned for what I am doing, oh well. I'm willing to take that risk if it means helping other people to have TRUE freedom of speech and freedom of expression. And I'm willing to take the risk if it means getting what I need in order to keep my computer working and to protect it from hackers, viruses, and damage and stuff. The games aren't really worth the risk, but, as long as I'm risking it for a good cause, why not have some fun too?! :) GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO! Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less! Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj. ___ Chat mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/chat
Re: [freenet-chat] Re: David and Aaron!
On Fri, 11 May 2001 13:43:04 -0400 frankg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I wasn't trying to start a debate about copying software. That wasn't the point. Do we really need the SPA's attention or PGP's lawyers fucking with Freenet? You didn't see the irony about a guy posting a msg about being secure by posting a link to a pirated (oops that bad word again) version of PGP on this list. Oh, yes, I see the irony. It was an insecure message which exposed David to the risk of legal action being taken against him. His mistake. But how does that effect you in any way? They are going to attack freenet anyway, they have all the amunition they need. Nothing we do or say on here or on freenet will change that. Ok Mark, start posting your warez links d00D. Threaten the U.S. president like that other dork. Freenet really needs this type of publicity. Ok, you know nothing about me, and you are calling me a dork. Are you still in grade school or something? People have been *oh my* censored on this list. Yes, I remember at least one guy was blocked from these mailing lists. Hmm, I have never seen you before, and never known anyone to be blocked from the list, but I think people who go around calling people nasty names and getting into stupid online arguments for no good reason might become a candicate for censure. Not that I like censorship, I hate it, but I also don't really like being called an idiot or a dork. So don't call me the thought police. I told those idiots to shut up. I didn't block them from Freenet's mailing lists, which has been done by Freenet official members. So if we choose to ignore you and not shut up, you would be unable to control us, right? You can ignore David and me if you like. I have no problem with that. In fact, lets just ignore each other from now on. I won't read anymore messages from you, and you won't read messages from David or me. :) Ok, problem solved. Everyone loves censorship. Its a bitch deciding when its wrong or right huh? Remember the kid on the dev list who tried to remove the pedophile picture test.jpg with htl 1 attacks? Tavin Cole had problems with him try removing pedophile pictures. Then we see Tavin talking about Think Cash, a way to prevent spammers from posting to Freenet. I know spammers are worse than pedophiles, but... nah that isn't censorship. Nah. We all love censorship. I don't like censorship, in fact, I would rather communicate with people on this list securely useing PGP. But, unless other people want to do it, it will never happen will it? The only kind of censorship I will ever support is the right and ability to ignore anyone you want to. So, I will now excercise that right and ignore any messages from you, good day. :) GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO! Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less! Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj. ___ Chat mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/chat
Re: [freenet-chat] Re: David and Aaron!
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 02:06:26PM -0400, frankg wrote: Quoting Tavin Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 01:43:04PM -0400, frankg wrote: Remember the kid on the dev list who tried to remove the pedophile picture test.jpg with htl 1 attacks? Tavin Cole had problems with him try removing pedophile pictures. Then we see Tavin talking about Think Cash, a way to prevent spammers from posting to Freenet. I know spammers are worse than pedophiles, but... nah that isn't censorship. Nah. We all love censorship. Excuse me, but where do you get off misconstruing my statements, out of context, in an argument that I am completely uninvolved in? Everything I said was true. What did I take out of context? I was making the point that everyone loves censorship in one form or another. You're an excellent example that came to mind. I once expressed irritation with some of Mr. Todd's activities. I never said I had problems with him try removing pedophile pictures (sic). I have discussed think cash on the list. How do you get from there to saying I'm advocating censorship? You have a problem with me talking about things you have said on a public mailing list? No, but civility recommends that you not misquote me, nor draw ungrounded conclusions, nor make unpleasant insinuations about my character. -- # tavin cole # # The process of scientific discovery is, in effect, # a continual flight from wonder. # - Albert Einstein ___ Chat mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/chat
Re: [freenet-chat] David and Aaron!
Quoting Aaron P Ingebrigtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]: As for advertiseing pirated software on a public email list, that is a risk the advertiser takes. We all know this. By saying you have pirated software in public, you take the risk of being hunted down and punished by the government. It is not your risk, nor freenet's, but David's and anyone else's who chooses to do what David did. And anyone who sais that they are haveing trouble with PGP Disk, such as I have, is not necessarily saying that they have pirated software. Did I say I downloaded and installed pirated software? No. How do you know that I haven't purchased it? You don't, do you? I don't care about you Aaron. I care about Freenet. I care about bad publicity for Freenet. You are talking about pirating software and this isn't the place for it. You in particular did encourage other people to create a link from a pirated piece of software in the KSK form to a more secure SSK form. I did not mention my opinion about pirating being bad or good. It is bad for Freenet if people use these lists for pirating talk. Why are you putting freenetproject.org in jeapordy? Talk about PGP all you want. Don't post links to pirated copies of it here or encourage others to do illegal acts on this list. I didn't accuse you of owning pirated software. Do you have to give proof of purchase for a piece of software before you can talk about that piece of software? I sure hope not, that would be a huge pain in the neck. Most of my software is shareware, freeware, or purchased. I freely admit here and now that I do have abandonware. If I go down in flames for haveing Doom or something, oh well. As for pirated software, well, if I can't pay for it because I have no money, then I'm not STEALING money from the authors of the programs. If I do get enough money to pay my debt I will concider any pirated software I have to be part of that debt and will pay for them. Otherwise, I can't pay when I have no money, so, back off. If I get arrested and imprisoned for what I am doing, oh well. I'm willing to take that risk if it means helping other people to have TRUE freedom of speech and freedom of expression. And I'm willing to take the risk if it means getting what I need in order to keep my computer working and to protect it from hackers, viruses, and damage and stuff. The games aren't really worth the risk, but, as long as I'm risking it for a good cause, why not have some fun too?! :) GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO! Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less! Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj. ___ Chat mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/chat -- FREE ANONYMOUS EMAIL! Sign up now. http://www.subdimension.com/freemail ___ Chat mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/chat
Re: [freenet-chat] Legal vulnerabilities (was: JRE License)
On Fri, 11 May 2001, Aaron P Ingebrigtsen wrote: Aaron Davies wrote: What exactly is Bush doing that's going to kill so many people? Hmm, lets see, for starters he supports the death penalty in a system that kills innocent people for crimes they didn't commit. He is trying to get rid of a new Clean Water rule that drops the threshold of arsenic in the water from 50 ppb to like 10 ppb, which is what it is in the rest of the civilised world. Arsenic can cause cancer by the way, and oh yeah, IT'S POISON! He supports the drug war, I think. That in itself is bad enough. He supports the destruction of our environment in so many ways that affect us directly, and very very badly. I wouldn't be surprised if Big Oil, Big Auto, and Big Tobacco all have him in thier collective pockets. I'm sure there many more things that he is doing, but I can't remember them. I'll list them when I remember them. I think I have listed enough reasons to dislike him, even to hate him. And I think I have enough cause to hope he gets removed from office soon, by any means necessary. And with the possible exception of the arsenic thing, what of this is different from Clinton? Or Gore? -- ____ / ) / ) /--/ __. __ / / __. , __o _ _ / (_(_/|_/ (_(_) / / _ /__/_(_/|_\/ __/_/_)_ ___ Chat mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/chat
Re: [freenet-chat] Re: David and Aaron!
Quoting Tavin Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 02:06:26PM -0400, frankg wrote: Quoting Tavin Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 01:43:04PM -0400, frankg wrote: Remember the kid on the dev list who tried to remove the pedophile picture test.jpg with htl 1 attacks? Tavin Cole had problems with him try removing pedophile pictures. Then we see Tavin talking about Think Cash, a way to prevent spammers from posting to Freenet. I know spammers are worse than pedophiles, but... nah that isn't censorship. Nah. We all love censorship. Excuse me, but where do you get off misconstruing my statements, out of context, in an argument that I am completely uninvolved in? Everything I said was true. What did I take out of context? I was making the point that everyone loves censorship in one form or another. You're an excellent example that came to mind. I once expressed irritation with some of Mr. Todd's activities. I never said I had problems with him try removing pedophile pictures (sic). I have discussed think cash on the list. How do you get from there to saying I'm advocating censorship? You have a problem with me talking about things you have said on a public mailing list? No, but civility recommends that you not misquote me, nor draw ungrounded conclusions, nor make unpleasant insinuations about my character. -- I didn't quote you so I couldn't have misquoted you. I explained that you 'had problems with him trying to remove...' , and it was true. Go look at that thread and you will see the 'activities' you were irritated about were in fact trying to remove test.jpg which he said was child porno and child porno was the only thing he was trying to remove. It was a sensational example and I didn't mean to imply anything about your character. I appologize. The purpose of think cash is to censor spammers. It is not a big leap. Censorship is censorship and it is good. # tavin cole # # The process of scientific discovery is, in effect, # a continual flight from wonder. # - Albert Einstein ___ Chat mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/chat -- FREE ANONYMOUS EMAIL! Sign up now. http://www.subdimension.com/freemail ___ Chat mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/chat
Re: [freenet-chat] Re: David and Aaron!
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 03:40:36PM -0400, frankg wrote: Quoting Tavin Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 02:06:26PM -0400, frankg wrote: Quoting Tavin Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 01:43:04PM -0400, frankg wrote: Remember the kid on the dev list who tried to remove the pedophile picture test.jpg with htl 1 attacks? Tavin Cole had problems with him try removing pedophile pictures. Then we see Tavin talking about Think Cash, a way to prevent spammers from posting to Freenet. I know spammers are worse than pedophiles, but... nah that isn't censorship. Nah. We all love censorship. Excuse me, but where do you get off misconstruing my statements, out of context, in an argument that I am completely uninvolved in? Everything I said was true. What did I take out of context? I was making the point that everyone loves censorship in one form or another. You're an excellent example that came to mind. I once expressed irritation with some of Mr. Todd's activities. I never said I had problems with him try removing pedophile pictures (sic). I have discussed think cash on the list. How do you get from there to saying I'm advocating censorship? You have a problem with me talking about things you have said on a public mailing list? No, but civility recommends that you not misquote me, nor draw ungrounded conclusions, nor make unpleasant insinuations about my character. -- I didn't quote you so I couldn't have misquoted you. I explained that you 'had problems with him trying to remove...' , and it was true. Go look at that thread and you will see the 'activities' you were irritated about were in fact trying to remove test.jpg which he said was child porno and child porno was the only thing he was trying to remove. Actually, what irritated me was the fproxy web bugs he was distributing. Someone had posted a rather obfuscated message about it and I followed a link to see what they were talking about, and realized I'd just managed to get my I.P. address on a shit list of alleged pedophiles. Wonderful. As for the replacement attack on test.jpg, I must say that I don't agree with the approach of artificially concealing the evils of our society. However, your recent retelling of this was indeed sensationalized and rather libelous as far as the implicit accusation of pedophilia. I think the exploitation of children is terrible, thank you very much. It was a sensational example and I didn't mean to imply anything about your character. I appologize. Thank you. The purpose of think cash is to censor spammers. It is not a big leap. Censorship is censorship and it is good. I don't think you can really equate the effort to protect one's electronic mailbox from spam with the abrogation of an individual's rights to free speech. Think cash doesn't even stop posts, it justs slows them down. Completely blocking someone from posting messages to a public forum would be censorship. -- # tavin cole # # The process of scientific discovery is, in effect, # a continual flight from wonder. # - Albert Einstein ___ Chat mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/chat
Re: [freenet-chat] Re: David and Aaron!
Quoting Tavin Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED]: The purpose of think cash is to censor spammers. It is not a big leap. Censorship is censorship and it is good. I don't think you can really equate the effort to protect one's electronic mailbox from spam with the abrogation of an individual's rights to free speech. Think cash doesn't even stop posts, it justs slows them down. Completely blocking someone from posting messages to a public forum would be censorship. I used the words censorship and spammer. Think cash will stop spammers by not allowing them to post information automatically. I applaud you for attempting to censor spammers. You rock. Screw the bad guys. Some censorship is good, like think cash. When your flight gets delayed because somebody wants to exercise their individual rights by joking they have a bomb in their coat don't you wish they were censorsed or punished for that free speech? Stop answering these emails and go code. You are good at that. -- # tavin cole # # The process of scientific discovery is, in effect, # a continual flight from wonder. # - Albert Einstein -- FREE ANONYMOUS EMAIL! Sign up now. http://www.subdimension.com/freemail ___ Chat mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/chat
Re: [freenet-chat] Re: David and Aaron!
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 04:21:58PM -0400, frankg wrote: Quoting Tavin Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Actually, what irritated me was the fproxy web bugs he was distributing. Someone had posted a rather obfuscated message about it and I followed a link to see what they were talking about, and realized I'd just managed to get my I.P. address on a shit list of alleged pedophiles. Wonderful. The post I have mentioned every time so far involved test.jpg, child porno. If you were talking about web bugs, you sure didn't show it by replying to this message: What are you trying to prove with this? In any case you will note my reply did not specifically mention anything about test.jpg, therefore the most you can say is it is unclear what I was referring to. I am very sorry if anyone interpreted this as some kind of defense of child exploitation. I hope I have adequately explained the actual nature of my commentary. Why are you so concerned with people restraining their comments so as not to incriminate freenetproject, while you're not concerned with ensuring the accuracy of your own statements so as not to slander a project volunteer? Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 04:36:44 -0400 From: Tavin Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [freenet-devl] Flaw Exposed Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 11:58:30PM -0400, Peter Todd wrote: I'm thinking of running this attack against test.jpg (!@#$ childporn, as a *test* key? makes us look real bad) It should work. If it does any other keys you want dead? test.html might be a good target, again makes us look bad. (hey Freenet is anarchy, use a SSK) I'm personally a little irritated with you appointing yourself the policeman of Freenet. Censorship and monitoring sucks, period. just my humble $.02. no offense meant. -- # tavin cole # # The process of scientific discovery is, in effect, # a continual flight from wonder. # - Albert Einstein ___ Chat mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/chat
Re: [freenet-chat] PGP signatures
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 11:30:46AM -0700, Aaron P Ingebrigtsen wrote: Could people just kind of post thier PGP signatures here? It would be nice to have a list of everyone's PGP signatures under one subject. Or you could just put your PGP signature on all your messages. :) Umm, what would we be signing if we posted pgp sigs here? Do you mean public keys? -- Leo Howell M5AKW freenet:MSK@SSK@2vz8xnhEJyJOlBVNfBEOWaohQFEQAgE/freesite// PGP signature
Re: [freenet-chat] Re: David and Aaron!
Quoting Tavin Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 04:21:58PM -0400, frankg wrote: Quoting Tavin Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Actually, what irritated me was the fproxy web bugs he was distributing. Someone had posted a rather obfuscated message about it and I followed a link to see what they were talking about, and realized I'd just managed to get my I.P. address on a shit list of alleged pedophiles. Wonderful. The post I have mentioned every time so far involved test.jpg, child porno. If you were talking about web bugs, you sure didn't show it by replying to this message: What are you trying to prove with this? In any case you will note my reply did not specifically mention anything about test.jpg, therefore the most you can say is it is unclear what I was referring to. I am very sorry if anyone interpreted this as some kind of defense of child exploitation. I hope I have adequately explained the actual nature of my commentary. Why are you so concerned with people restraining their comments so as not to incriminate freenetproject, while you're not concerned with ensuring the accuracy of your own statements so as not to slander a project volunteer? I'm trying to prove that I didn't slander you. I quoted you one time. Everything I said was 100% accurate. You replied to a post about removing child pornography by responding 'Censorship and monitoring sucks, period.' I congratulate Mr. Todd for trying to remove child pornograpy. Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 04:36:44 -0400 From: Tavin Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [freenet-devl] Flaw Exposed Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 11:58:30PM -0400, Peter Todd wrote: I'm thinking of running this attack against test.jpg (!@#$ childporn, as a *test* key? makes us look real bad) It should work. If it does any other keys you want dead? test.html might be a good target, again makes us look bad. (hey Freenet is anarchy, use a SSK) I'm personally a little irritated with you appointing yourself the policeman of Freenet. Censorship and monitoring sucks, period. just my humble $.02. no offense meant. -- # tavin cole # # The process of scientific discovery is, in effect, # a continual flight from wonder. # - Albert Einstein ___ Chat mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/chat -- FREE ANONYMOUS EMAIL! Sign up now. http://www.subdimension.com/freemail ___ Chat mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/chat
Re: [freenet-chat] Re: David and Aaron!
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 04:57:50PM -0400, frankg wrote: What are you trying to prove with this? In any case you will note my reply did not specifically mention anything about test.jpg, therefore the most you can say is it is unclear what I was referring to. I am very sorry if anyone interpreted this as some kind of defense of child exploitation. I hope I have adequately explained the actual nature of my commentary. Why are you so concerned with people restraining their comments so as not to incriminate freenetproject, while you're not concerned with ensuring the accuracy of your own statements so as not to slander a project volunteer? I'm trying to prove that I didn't slander you. I quoted you one time. Everything I said was 100% accurate. No, it wasn't. You replied to a post about removing child pornography by responding 'Censorship and monitoring sucks, period.' That is true, but it's not what you said the first time. I congratulate Mr. Todd for trying to remove child pornograpy. Yea.. if I was going to support censorship at all I'd support that. -- # tavin cole # # The process of scientific discovery is, in effect, # a continual flight from wonder. # - Albert Einstein ___ Chat mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/chat
Re: [freenet-chat] David and Aaron!
Aaron P Ingebrigtsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: As for advertiseing pirated software on a public email list, that is a risk the advertiser takes. We all know this. By saying you have pirated software in public, you take the risk of being hunted down and punished by the government. It is not your risk, nor freenet's, but David's and anyone else's who chooses to do what David did. I don't recall that David actually said he had commited an act of copyright infringement. He merely posted a Freenet key, without claiming that he had inserted that key. For all we know, he might have stumbled across it on one of the key indices. -- Greg Wooledge | Truth belongs to everybody. [EMAIL PROTECTED] |- The Red Hot Chili Peppers http://wooledge.org/~greg/ | PGP signature
Re: [freenet-chat] PGP signatures
Aaron P Ingebrigtsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Could people just kind of post thier PGP signatures here? It would be nice to have a list of everyone's PGP signatures under one subject. *Why*? That's what your public key ring is for! (Not to mention the public key servers) -- Greg Wooledge | Truth belongs to everybody. [EMAIL PROTECTED] |- The Red Hot Chili Peppers http://wooledge.org/~greg/ | PGP signature
[freenet-chat] Can you help me?
I'm a student in Vietnam. I want to programming to play mp4 format files. Can you help me about this ? Can you send me or talk me a url to download a source of mp4 player ? I'm programming with VB6. Please reply me soon. Thank you, Tran Quang Huy
