[CinCV] change fieldorder, doubling framerate

2010-08-19 Thread Gerrit de Jong
Hello everybody

Having some trouble I checked the webarchive but found mainly a lot of which
is code I pressume. I cannot even read it. In the dark ages of computers I
learned some programming in basic, that's all. I am also new to video
editing.
I want to use video and Cinelerra for motion analysis in sports. Yet I
haven't been successful in producing any usable clips for that purpose.
According to advise on the web I captured with Kino in Quicktime format.
I use a Sony dv camcorder with interlace (PAL)
Searching the web I already found Cinelerra by default uses the wrong field
order, which I found to break chronology of frames when using the field to
frame effect.

What I want is doubling framerate, change fieldorder, field to frames,
interpolate to full frames, stabilize the subject, render it, give the
individual clips a name and store them in a database. Having done that I can
analyze sport movements in slow motion or frame by frame in 50 frames per
second resolution.

My questions;
 is this the right sequence, or should I change the order of actions?
 can I do all this in a single pass, it is called a pipe if I got it right,
or should I have multiple passes?
 In the preferences for playback I found a setting for playback of 16 frames
per foot. I presume if I set this to 32 it will give me 50 frames per
second, but will it work to for rendering in 50 fps or does it work only for
playback?
 How can I change fieldorder ? (The manual says nothing about it and
although I found some remarks on the web of the wrong field order I found
nothing about how to change it.)

As I am not a coder I cannot be of any help in developing Cinelerra, but
possibly I can contribute to improving the manual so that other dummy's like
me more easy learn to work with it.

With kind regards, Gerrit


Re: [CinCV] change fieldorder, doubling framerate

2010-08-19 Thread mskala
On Thu, 19 Aug 2010, Gerrit de Jong wrote:
  In the preferences for playback I found a setting for playback of 16 frames
 per foot. I presume if I set this to 32 it will give me 50 frames per
 second, but will it work to for rendering in 50 fps or does it work only for
 playback?

I don't think that's what you want.  You have a choice of what units to
use for displaying the location in the user interface - for instance, you
could display it by minutes and fractional seconds, or by minutes,
seconds, and frames.  One of the choices is to display it by feet as if
you were editing physical film.  (I imagine there are people who were
trained on physical film editing and are accustomed to thinking in terms
of feet.)  Because there are different film standards, you can choose
which one to simulate by choosing a different number of frames per foot.
But that only changes THE NUMBERS YOU SEE ON THE TIMELINE, and even those
only if you also choose the feet option for how to display the numbers.
The amount of time it really takes to play a clip has nothing to do with
the units of measure you select for the display.

It's like choosing whether you will weigh something in kilograms or
pounds, and then choosing how many grams you will say are in a kilogram.
You get different numbers depending on the choices you make, and they will
be nonsense if you choose a strange number of grams per kilogram, but
nothing actually gets heavier or lighter just because you changed your
measurement standard.

Sorry I don't have any positive suggestions on the field issues; those
are unclear to me, too.  But I'm sure changing the frames per foot
setting won't help you.
-- 
Matthew Skala
msk...@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca People before principles.
http://ansuz.sooke.bc.ca/

___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra


Re: [CinCV] change fieldorder, doubling framerate

2010-08-19 Thread Tom King


Quoting msk...@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca:


On Thu, 19 Aug 2010, Gerrit de Jong wrote:

 In the preferences for playback I found a setting for playback of 16 frames
per foot. I presume if I set this to 32 it will give me 50 frames per
second, but will it work to for rendering in 50 fps or does it work only for
playback?


I don't think that's what you want.  You have a choice of what units to
use for displaying the location in the user interface - for instance, you
could display it by minutes and fractional seconds, or by minutes,
seconds, and frames.  One of the choices is to display it by feet as if
you were editing physical film.  (I imagine there are people who were
trained on physical film editing and are accustomed to thinking in terms
of feet.)  Because there are different film standards, you can choose
which one to simulate by choosing a different number of frames per foot.
But that only changes THE NUMBERS YOU SEE ON THE TIMELINE, and even those
only if you also choose the feet option for how to display the numbers.
The amount of time it really takes to play a clip has nothing to do with
the units of measure you select for the display.

It's like choosing whether you will weigh something in kilograms or
pounds, and then choosing how many grams you will say are in a kilogram.
You get different numbers depending on the choices you make, and they will
be nonsense if you choose a strange number of grams per kilogram, but
nothing actually gets heavier or lighter just because you changed your
measurement standard.

Sorry I don't have any positive suggestions on the field issues; those
are unclear to me, too.  But I'm sure changing the frames per foot
setting won't help you.


Dean Ashby had mucked around with Reframe RT and it sounded like that  
was closer to what you want. However, it was giving him fits so there  
may be some work to do with it.


Tom King


Concern for man and his fate must always form the chief interest of  
all technical endeavors. Never forget this in the midst of your  
diagrams and equations. --Albert Einstein




___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra


[CinCV] Re: How to unsubscribe from this mailing list?

2010-08-19 Thread Trey Marc

 E I tried hard to use alternatives under Linux there was open movie
 E editor that looked nice and worked well for colour correction.
 E Unfortunately all devel stopped.. :'(
 
 Have you tried http://www.openshotvideo.com/ ?
 

this sounds very sarcastic to me ..beter consider using ramen for colour
correction


___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra