Re: [CinCV Old] [CinCV TNG] Gui frozen
Well, it really depends when you last did the pull. If you type: Git log You get a list of commits. Then: Git checkout commit Where commit is the hashtag of the commit. You can make cinelerra at any commit stage going backwards from master. Nicola On Mar 26, 2015 17:47, edouard chalaron e.chala...@xtra.co.nz wrote: Problem happened 24 h ago after a git pull. Does that help (a bit ...) ? cheers E On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 17:41 -0400, Nicola Ferralis wrote: For those building from git, can you selectively build on previous commits and test the behavior? That would help pinpointing to the patch that might be responsible... Thanks, Nicola On Mar 26, 2015 5:32 PM, edouard chalaron e.chalaron@xtra.co.nz wrote: Problem also exists with exported quicktime. It usually works perfectly fine. As a matter of a fact non updated version of Cinelerra on other machines (same OS) work fine. Best E Duration: 00:04:34.88, start: 0.00, bitrate: 372141 kb/s Stream #0:0(eng): Video: rawvideo (yuv2 / 0x32767579), yuyv422, 1392x1040, 370606 kb/s, 16 fps, 16 tbr, 1600 tbn, 1600 tbc (default) Metadata: creation_time : 2015-03-25 23:17:17 handler_name : Linux Alias Data Handler encoder : Quicktime for Linux Stream #0:1(eng): Audio: pcm_s16be (twos / 0x736F7774), 48000 Hz, 2 channels, s16, 1536 kb/s (default) Metadata: creation_time : 2015-03-25 23:17:17 handler_name : Linux Alias Data Handler On Fri, 2015-03-27 at 09:47 1300, edouard chalaron wrote: Ok this is a new problem because I work exclusively with sequence of Tiff files. However I noticed recently some issues with libttiff, some imagemagick scripts are returning garbage could it be linked ? Cheers E On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 22:09 0200, igor_ubuntu wrote: I confirm the existence of this problem. The situation appears after loading multiple tiff - images on a single track. After I sets the label, buttons of patchbay cease to respond. I can not use the motion control in Compositor: slider, play /stop, 1 frame etc .. - non reactive But all buttons on the vertical left row are active Igor 2015-03-26 21:39 GMT02:00 edouard chalaron e.chalaron@xtra.co.nz: Hello Einar No ideas. Should not happen. Thats what I thought too. But I cant explain it. First, I did a git pull; make distclean etc all seems fine I made sure that my system is up to date. Can you give me more information how to reproduce the bug? Yesterday I did not have much time to experiment fully so here is a more complete description I loaded a Tiff sequence; added 2 mute tracks for audio I still can navigate zoom in (select a portion then f etc ..) Now lets say I want to isolate a sequence : l l on each boundary of this sequence Usually by double clicking in between the tags one can select the content between each tags I cant anymore Neither can I set a given video track to be displayed or not (arming track on the left) of the gui However I can manually select the scene, I can still play the video, add plugins, I can still navigate, save and exit properly If I go to compositor : I cant use the little icons (generate Keyframes, in point etc ..) the all line is non reactive I cant also use the play /stop, 1 frame etc ... non reactive I cant zoom (auto, 150 % etc ..) non reactive I cant use the slider if I press space bar the video plays fine I can use the color picker and all buttons on the vertical left row (mask color picker tested) I can save and exit cinelerra properly, I can render So it seems that only some commands are non responive Best
[CinCV Old] [CinCV] End of support for Cinelerra Ubuntu PPA
As a casual user (and not a developer) I don't personally have any beef with neither factions (yes, because, unfortunately of factions we are talking about here). However, as a user, I am intimidated by all this, mostly now that is getting personal. I am very uneasy with this. For anybody that may care, some history. I barely used Cinelerra, mainly because of my lack of substantial projects for it. I settled with the CV version because - don't laugh - it was the only version I could manage to compile successfully and quickly, without investing a day for it. I strongly believed that in 2010 to have to compile a program from scratch to use it sounded to me prehistoric, anachronistic and a horrible waste of time (for the casual user anyway). Besides for both CV and HW versions, compilation has been terrible for new Linux users. A complain is always easy to throw out, so I set myself to help in what I know how to do. So, just as I do for other scientific software, I created the Cinelerra Ubuntu PPA where people can seamlessly install it in seconds. I hope it served some purpose and helped a few souls. I wanted to created a PPA for HW, but time prevented me to dive in. Besides, I had no needs. Now, I have better things in life waiting for me, with much more cohesive and exciting communities to be in. I am not going to pretend that I am relevant or needed (or worst, that I own anything). I simply am not and I don't. So as of today, I will no longer maintain the PPA, I won't even look at bug reports and respond to emails. Current binaries will remain available, but no ports to new releases of Ubuntu will be made. I could transfer to anybody interested the administration rights (including Mr. Collins), but I don't want the PPA to be another battleground for war. So if someone wants to make a new PPA from scratch, please proceed, it's easy enough being open source. With that, good luck on your endeavor, being cinelerra-cv, cinelerra hw-non-cv or anything in between. Best Wishes to All. Nicola Ferralis P.S. I'd only ask - you know who you are - not to spam me with requests of linkedin connections. I won't grant any, because I value actual personal relationships more than a high count on my connections. You won't gain much of anything of having me on your linkedin connections as I have no expertize in arts, video editing, Hollywood, etc. ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://lists.skolelinux.org/listinfo/cinelerra
Re: [CinCV] Where to downloaded Cinelerra CV in 2014 ?
Not an ideal solution, but the upstream, unpatched source of Cinelerra-CV is available in the PPA repository: https://launchpad.net/~cinelerra-ppa/+archive/ppa/+files/cinelerra-cv_2.2.orig.tar.bz2 Patches are also available in the debian specific tarball: https://launchpad.net/~cinelerra-ppa/+archive/ppa/+files/cinelerra-cv_2.2-0.15%7Eppa1%7Esaucy1.debian.tar.gz Again, not ideal, but better than nothing. Nicola On 1/13/14, 10:36 AM, xi wrote: Hello Cinelerra team! cinelerra.org domain has expired, so where can I find the latest sources of Cinelerra CV now? (I am using Cinelerra since ages and I would like to compile the latest version for my new computer). Regards, Xavier ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://lists.skolelinux.org/listinfo/cinelerra ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://lists.skolelinux.org/listinfo/cinelerra
Re: [CinCV] Updated Cinelerra PPA
Hi, Just the patches pushed by Einar. I am trying to keep the ppa as close as possible to the official git. Nicola David Armstrong bod...@netspace.net.au wrote: Just got a PPA update on Ubuntu. Well Done! Is anyone able to advise what is in the updated version? cheers David On 12/10/13 07:08, Einar Rünkaru wrote: Hi. Pushed the following patches # Fix in File::read_frame calling of cmodel_transfer http://www.mail-archive.com/cinelerra@skolelinux.no/msg14059.html # Increment the year in copyright message http://www.mail-archive.com/cinelerra@skolelinux.no/msg14058.html # Fixed compilation on Arch Linux http://www.mail-archive.com/cinelerra@skolelinux.no/msg14057.html # # Einar ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://lists.skolelinux.org/listinfo/cinelerra ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://lists.skolelinux.org/listinfo/cinelerra ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://lists.skolelinux.org/listinfo/cinelerra
Re: [CinCV] Updated Cinelerra PPA
No problem! Just Einars. I could push the others that have been floating around, but I'd like to wait until they are merged into the main tree. Is there any plan for that? Thanks, Nicola On 10/15/13 10:35 AM, Haldun ALTAN wrote: Tnahk you Nicolas I was going to ask the question Are all the patches included or just Einar's Thanks, Haldun. Le 15/10/2013 15:29, Nicola Ferralis a écrit : Hi, Just the patches pushed by Einar. I am trying to keep the ppa as close as possible to the official git. Nicola David Armstrong bod...@netspace.net.au wrote: Just got a PPA update on Ubuntu. Well Done! Is anyone able to advise what is in the updated version? cheers David On 12/10/13 07:08, Einar Rünkaru wrote: Hi. Pushed the following patches # Fix in File::read_frame calling of cmodel_transfer http://www.mail-archive.com/cinelerra@skolelinux.no/msg14059.html # Increment the year in copyright message http://www.mail-archive.com/cinelerra@skolelinux.no/msg14058.html # Fixed compilation on Arch Linux http://www.mail-archive.com/cinelerra@skolelinux.no/msg14057.html # # Einar ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no mailto:Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://lists.skolelinux.org/listinfo/cinelerra ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://lists.skolelinux.org/listinfo/cinelerra ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://lists.skolelinux.org/listinfo/cinelerra JUst Einar' ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://lists.skolelinux.org/listinfo/cinelerra
Re: [CinCV] Cinelerra Ubuntu 13.04
Earlier builds for 13.04 (raring) in the ppa had dependencies issues that are fixed in the current builds. Cinelerra now installs fine on Raring. I recommend uninstalling Cinelerra, reloading the repos and try installing again. David Armstrong bod...@netspace.net.au wrote: Anyone had success installing or compiling under Ubuntu 13.04? I've tried both but with two fails. For compile, I errored with : //usr/bin/ld: /usr/local/lib/libx264.a(common.o): relocation R_X86_64_32 against `.rodata.str1.1' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC// ///usr/local/lib/libx264.a: could not read symbols: Bad value// //collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status/ Also tried the PPA install. After install, the first error I got trying to run was: /cinelerra: error while loading shared libraries: libjpeg.so.62: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory/ Overcame that by installing libjpeg62, but then got: /cinelerra: error while loading shared libraries: libmjpegutils-1.9.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory/ Ubuntu 13.04 has libmjpegutils2.0 in synaptic, which is installed, but not v1.9. So, any suggestions? cheers ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://lists.skolelinux.org/listinfo/cinelerra ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://lists.skolelinux.org/listinfo/cinelerra
RE: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV
Dear All, I finally migrated cinelerra's builds to use the new name cinelerra-cv. The name change will affect all the related libraries. The new builds are available in the main PPA: https://launchpad.net/~cinelerra-ppa/+archive/ppa If you have been using such PPA, I recommend installing the cinelerra-cv package. This will remove the old series (cinelerra) and install the new one. It goes without saying that the older cinelerra builds are no longer available nor maintained. Raffaella, would you please add a line in the webpage stating how to install cinelerra, once the the PPA has been enabled? sudo apt-get install cinelerra-cv Please let me know if you find any issue. Thanks. Nicola From: blchu...@iinet.net.au To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Subject: Re: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 22:07:53 +1100 On 06/11/12 20:32, Raffaella Traniello wrote: Ciao! On 11/06/2012 05:20 AM, Basil Chupin wrote: I looked at this- http://cinelerra.org/getting_cinelerra.php which shows that Cinelerra CV has not been compiled for Ubuntu for quite some time ... actually it shows only that I forgot to update that page!! Sorry about that. I'll fix it as soon as I can. Ciao! Raffaella Ah! Well, there you are: the answer is readily at hand :-) . BC -- Using openSUSE 12.2 x86_64 KDE 4.9.2 kernel 3.6.5-1 on a system with- AMD FX 8-core 3.6/4.2GHz processor 16GB PC14900/1866MHz Quad Channel Corsair Vengeance RAM Gigabyte AMD3+ m/board; Gigabyte nVidia GTX550Ti 1GB DDR5 GPU
RE: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV
BC Once again, the current cinelerra PPA is compiled from source (CV) for Ubuntu, in fact it is for pretty much every recent release. The current binaries are based on the codebase 2.2 with the recent patches. I am not sure why you keep saying that CV is not compiled from source for CV. I have no interest nor motivation to make another ppa for the HW, maybe someone else can take that task. When time will allow me, I will try to modify the package names to reflect that what is in the PPA really is cinelerra-cv. NF From: wmstr...@yahoo.com Subject: Re: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 07:21:42 -0800 From: Basil Chupin blchu...@iinet.net.au To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Sent: Monday, November 5, 2012 5:02:17 AM Subject: Re: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV On 05/11/12 20:26, Sean M. Pappalardo wrote: On 11/3/2012 9:24 PM, Nicola Ferralis wrote: https://launchpad.net/~cinelerra-ppa/+archive/ppa I created the cinelerra-cv PPA repository for cases where multiple version of cinelerra repositories were to be installed. However, that created much trouble and the cinelerra-cv is now deprecated, and out of date. Does this apply to everyone? Like is the CV version itself no longer maintained and we should all use Heroine's version 4.x? If that's not the case, for those of us running straight Debian, is deb-multimedia still the recommended place to get the packages? Thanks for the clarification. The CV is being developed day-by-day and is always ahead, in one way, of the heroinewarrier (v4.4) because hw only takes from CV what it considers to be relevant to it aims. What your problem is is that the CV is not being compiled from source file for Ubuntu. On the other hand, I am using openSUSE and I have the very latest Cinelerra CV - released only a day or so ago - readily available (and installed). BC I am using Ubuntu 12.10 and would not want to change distributions simply to be able to use Cinelerra-CV. I am getting the impression that the CV version is not being kept up to date for Ubuntu, and perhaps not for many other distributions such as Debian. Is that correct? If so, I guess I will have to stick with the HW Version. Murray
RE: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV
Furthermore, as suggested, if one prefers, compiling cinelerra (either version, really) it's simple enough. From: feran...@hotmail.com To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Subject: RE: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 08:03:13 -0800 BC Once again, the current cinelerra PPA is compiled from source (CV) for Ubuntu, in fact it is for pretty much every recent release. The current binaries are based on the codebase 2.2 with the recent patches. I am not sure why you keep saying that CV is not compiled from source for CV. I have no interest nor motivation to make another ppa for the HW, maybe someone else can take that task. When time will allow me, I will try to modify the package names to reflect that what is in the PPA really is cinelerra-cv. NF From: wmstr...@yahoo.com Subject: Re: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 07:21:42 -0800 From: Basil Chupin blchu...@iinet.net.au To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Sent: Monday, November 5, 2012 5:02:17 AM Subject: Re: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV On 05/11/12 20:26, Sean M. Pappalardo wrote: On 11/3/2012 9:24 PM, Nicola Ferralis wrote: https://launchpad.net/~cinelerra-ppa/+archive/ppa I created the cinelerra-cv PPA repository for cases where multiple version of cinelerra repositories were to be installed. However, that created much trouble and the cinelerra-cv is now deprecated, and out of date. Does this apply to everyone? Like is the CV version itself no longer maintained and we should all use Heroine's version 4.x? If that's not the case, for those of us running straight Debian, is deb-multimedia still the recommended place to get the packages? Thanks for the clarification. The CV is being developed day-by-day and is always ahead, in one way, of the heroinewarrier (v4.4) because hw only takes from CV what it considers to be relevant to it aims. What your problem is is that the CV is not being compiled from source file for Ubuntu. On the other hand, I am using openSUSE and I have the very latest Cinelerra CV - released only a day or so ago - readily available (and installed). BC I am using Ubuntu 12.10 and would not want to change distributions simply to be able to use Cinelerra-CV. I am getting the impression that the CV version is not being kept up to date for Ubuntu, and perhaps not for many other distributions such as Debian. Is that correct? If so, I guess I will have to stick with the HW Version. Murray
RE: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV
Due to the confusion over the two repositories, I am updating the cinelerra-cv ppa with the latest builds (currently building, available in a few hours): A: https://launchpad.net/~cinelerra-ppa/+archive/cinelerra-cv The only difference (to the user) between these builds and those in the main PPA B: https://launchpad.net/~cinelerra-ppa/+archive/ppa is the different name for cinelerra (now cinelerra-cv). I would appreciate if anybody interested could test these new builds. A few precautions: 1. Uninstall the current cinelerra you might have from the PPA. 2. Disable the main PPA (B, above). 3. Enable the cinelerra-ppa PPA (A, above) 4. Install cinelerra-cv. If no issues are found, I will port those builds to the official PPA, so that the only available build will be, cinelerra-cv. Thanks, Nicola From: feran...@hotmail.com To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Subject: RE: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 08:04:36 -0800 Furthermore, as suggested, if one prefers, compiling cinelerra (either version, really) it's simple enough. From: feran...@hotmail.com To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Subject: RE: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 08:03:13 -0800 BC Once again, the current cinelerra PPA is compiled from source (CV) for Ubuntu, in fact it is for pretty much every recent release. The current binaries are based on the codebase 2.2 with the recent patches. I am not sure why you keep saying that CV is not compiled from source for CV. I have no interest nor motivation to make another ppa for the HW, maybe someone else can take that task. When time will allow me, I will try to modify the package names to reflect that what is in the PPA really is cinelerra-cv. NF From: wmstr...@yahoo.com Subject: Re: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 07:21:42 -0800 From: Basil Chupin blchu...@iinet.net.au To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Sent: Monday, November 5, 2012 5:02:17 AM Subject: Re: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV On 05/11/12 20:26, Sean M. Pappalardo wrote: On 11/3/2012 9:24 PM, Nicola Ferralis wrote: https://launchpad.net/~cinelerra-ppa/+archive/ppa I created the cinelerra-cv PPA repository for cases where multiple version of cinelerra repositories were to be installed. However, that created much trouble and the cinelerra-cv is now deprecated, and out of date. Does this apply to everyone? Like is the CV version itself no longer maintained and we should all use Heroine's version 4.x? If that's not the case, for those of us running straight Debian, is deb-multimedia still the recommended place to get the packages? Thanks for the clarification. The CV is being developed day-by-day and is always ahead, in one way, of the heroinewarrier (v4.4) because hw only takes from CV what it considers to be relevant to it aims. What your problem is is that the CV is not being compiled from source file for Ubuntu. On the other hand, I am using openSUSE and I have the very latest Cinelerra CV - released only a day or so ago - readily available (and installed). BC I am using Ubuntu 12.10 and would not want to change distributions simply to be able to use Cinelerra-CV. I am getting the impression that the CV version is not being kept up to date for Ubuntu, and perhaps not for many other distributions such as Debian. Is that correct? If so, I guess I will have to stick with the HW Version. Murray
RE: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV
Basil, If you refer to packages in in the official Ubuntu repositories, well you won't find any. That is why I made the PPA in first place. Regarding cinelerra.org, I don't really know what is in the official website other than links to various sources. All I know is that the PPA offers builds with the current version of the source for git (with patches of 09/24/2012). In fact these binaries were compiled on the 10/10/2012. Now, you may have a source that is newer than the official git in cinelerra.org. All I know is that the last update on it was on 09/24. The next time an the git tree is update, you will find a new build for Ubuntu in the PPA. This obviously doesn't prevent people from compiling their own packages. Regards, Nicola From: blchu...@iinet.net.au To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Subject: Re: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 15:20:16 +1100 On 06/11/12 03:03, Nicola Ferralis wrote: BC Once again, the current cinelerra PPA is compiled from source (CV) for Ubuntu, in fact it is for pretty much every recent release. The current binaries are based on the codebase 2.2 with the recent patches. I am not sure why you keep saying that CV is not compiled from source for CV. I have no interest nor motivation to make another ppa for the HW, maybe someone else can take that task. When time will allow me, I will try to modify the package names to reflect that what is in the PPA really is cinelerra-cv. NF Ummm, what would you compile it from other than the source? :-) I looked at this- http://cinelerra.org/getting_cinelerra.php which shows that Cinelerra CV has not been compiled for Ubuntu for quite some time - but I got my copy updated only a few hours ago with the latest update release made available only some 4 hours ago (at the time of writing this). BC -- Using openSUSE 12.2 x86_64 KDE 4.9.2 kernel 3.6.5-1 on a system with- AMD FX 8-core 3.6/4.2GHz processor 16GB PC14900/1866MHz Quad Channel Corsair Vengeance RAM Gigabyte AMD3+ m/board; Gigabyte nVidia GTX550Ti 1GB DDR5 GPU
RE: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV
The official, maintained and up-to-date PPA for cinelerra is, well, cinelerra (not cinelerra-cv): https://launchpad.net/~cinelerra-ppa/+archive/ppa I created the cinelerra-cv PPA repository for cases where multiple version of cinelerra repositories were to be installed. However, that created much trouble and the cinelerra-cv is now deprecated, and out of date. From a binary perspective, both PPA come from the same source, i.e. the community version of cinelerra. So I strongly recommend to use the one provided in the link above. Current packages in the cinelerra PPA ara available for ubuntu releases from Hardy (8.04) to Quantal (12.10). As I maintain the PPA, please let me know if you have any question/comment/bug to report. Nicola From: bod...@netspace.net.au To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Subject: Re: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2012 11:59:25 +1100 The PPA install binary has been prepared for 12.04 (correct me if I am wrong). Haven't heard of anyone compiling under 12.10 yet, and hence overcoming any issues likely to occur. Will let the more technical boffins on this distribution list expand further... BTW, I'm not planning to upgrade my 12.04 at the moment. On 04/11/12 11:26, Murray Strome wrote: After reading the Handy Tutorial, Install Cinelerra in Ubuntu 12.04 12.10 http://handytutorial.com/install-cinelerra-in-ubuntu-12-04-12-10/ I decided that it would be best to install the CV version on my newly installed Ubuntu 12.10. However, when I tried to do so following the instructions in the tutorial, I get the following error message: Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: cinelerra-cv : Depends: libguicast1 (= 1:2.2-0.6~ppa1~quantal1) but 1:2.2-0.12~ppa1~quantal1 is to be installed Depends: libmpeg3cine (= 1:2.2-0.6~ppa1~quantal1) but 1:2.2-0.12~ppa1~quantal1 is to be installed Depends: libquicktimecine (= 1:2.2-0.6~ppa1~quantal1) but 1:2.2-0.12~ppa1~quantal1 is to be installed E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. -- I then decided to just install the other version (sudo apt-get install cinelerra) after adding that repository. It seemed to install OK. Which version is recommended? Of course, if I want to use it, my only option is the non-CV version. Is this problem a bug which needs to be fixed, or is there something different that I should be doing? Thanks for any suggestions/advice.
RE: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV
PPA binaries are available for 12.04. I will start preparing packages for 13.04 fairly soon. From: bod...@netspace.net.au To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Subject: Re: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2012 11:59:25 +1100 The PPA install binary has been prepared for 12.04 (correct me if I am wrong). Haven't heard of anyone compiling under 12.10 yet, and hence overcoming any issues likely to occur. Will let the more technical boffins on this distribution list expand further... BTW, I'm not planning to upgrade my 12.04 at the moment. On 04/11/12 11:26, Murray Strome wrote: After reading the Handy Tutorial, Install Cinelerra in Ubuntu 12.04 12.10 http://handytutorial.com/install-cinelerra-in-ubuntu-12-04-12-10/ I decided that it would be best to install the CV version on my newly installed Ubuntu 12.10. However, when I tried to do so following the instructions in the tutorial, I get the following error message: Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: cinelerra-cv : Depends: libguicast1 (= 1:2.2-0.6~ppa1~quantal1) but 1:2.2-0.12~ppa1~quantal1 is to be installed Depends: libmpeg3cine (= 1:2.2-0.6~ppa1~quantal1) but 1:2.2-0.12~ppa1~quantal1 is to be installed Depends: libquicktimecine (= 1:2.2-0.6~ppa1~quantal1) but 1:2.2-0.12~ppa1~quantal1 is to be installed E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. -- I then decided to just install the other version (sudo apt-get install cinelerra) after adding that repository. It seemed to install OK. Which version is recommended? Of course, if I want to use it, my only option is the non-CV version. Is this problem a bug which needs to be fixed, or is there something different that I should be doing? Thanks for any suggestions/advice.
RE: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV
I just uploaded the new source for Raring (13.04). Binaries will be available for it in the next few hours in the Cinelerra ppa. From: feran...@hotmail.com To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Subject: RE: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 18:30:00 -0700 PPA binaries are available for 12.04. I will start preparing packages for 13.04 fairly soon. From: bod...@netspace.net.au To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Subject: Re: [CinCV] Cinelerra vs Cinelerra-CV Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2012 11:59:25 +1100 The PPA install binary has been prepared for 12.04 (correct me if I am wrong). Haven't heard of anyone compiling under 12.10 yet, and hence overcoming any issues likely to occur. Will let the more technical boffins on this distribution list expand further... BTW, I'm not planning to upgrade my 12.04 at the moment. On 04/11/12 11:26, Murray Strome wrote: After reading the Handy Tutorial, Install Cinelerra in Ubuntu 12.04 12.10 http://handytutorial.com/install-cinelerra-in-ubuntu-12-04-12-10/ I decided that it would be best to install the CV version on my newly installed Ubuntu 12.10. However, when I tried to do so following the instructions in the tutorial, I get the following error message: Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: cinelerra-cv : Depends: libguicast1 (= 1:2.2-0.6~ppa1~quantal1) but 1:2.2-0.12~ppa1~quantal1 is to be installed Depends: libmpeg3cine (= 1:2.2-0.6~ppa1~quantal1) but 1:2.2-0.12~ppa1~quantal1 is to be installed Depends: libquicktimecine (= 1:2.2-0.6~ppa1~quantal1) but 1:2.2-0.12~ppa1~quantal1 is to be installed E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. -- I then decided to just install the other version (sudo apt-get install cinelerra) after adding that repository. It seemed to install OK. Which version is recommended? Of course, if I want to use it, my only option is the non-CV version. Is this problem a bug which needs to be fixed, or is there something different that I should be doing? Thanks for any suggestions/advice.
RE: [CinCV] Sound delay problems
Yes, ppa is currently sinc'd with git with latest patches form early this month. From: cin467-i...@yahoo.de Subject: Re: [CinCV] Sound delay problems To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 19:12:42 +0100 Perhaps the Ubuntu Studio 12.04 version makes the difference. I will try it to test if there are any differences. Does anyone know if the git and the ppa Cinelerra are the same at the moment? David Armstrong bod...@netspace.net.au wrote: I am running 64 bit Ubuntu Studio 12.04 Have installed the pre-compiled ppa version. On 15/10/12 18:08, cin467-i...@yahoo.de wrote: Interessting. I got the sound delay with SD material (mjpeg) too. Perhaps Ubuntu 12.04 runs not pretty well on my hardware actually. I will investigate more this evening. Regards, Erik Von: David Armstrong bod...@netspace.net.au An: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Gesendet: 23:30 Sonntag, 14.Oktober 2012 Betreff: Re: [CinCV] Sound delay problems No sound delay when editing in SD (.dv or .move) or HD (.mov). When trying to edit directly with .mts HD, I get a delay. Can offset audio by about 0.48, and it's close. If I have talking heads where sync is critical, I reformat into dnxhd codec in quicktime (.mov). Everything works better with a cinelerra friendly codec. Only use .mts directly for quick and dirty edits. cheers David On 15/10/12 05:34, cin467-i...@yahoo.de wrote: Hello, I am using the latest Cinelerra-cv (64 bit) from the git repo on Ubuntu 12.04. I had a lot of problems with audio delay while playing the videos in Cinelerra. I tried the recommandation from the Grandma manual to switch to esound in the preferences. The result is no sound at all. Playing wiht the delay option (from Grandma too) gave no results too. I found a possible solution in setting the audio buffers in the preferences from 16K to 2k. I had this problem only on Ubuntu. On Debian 6.04 there were no problems with the default setting in Cinelerra. My questions: Should the esound trick works with Ubuntu 12.04 too (any additional changes in Ubuntu needed?) Why brings lowering the audio buffer good results and will this perhaps produce new problems? Best regards, Erik
[CinCV] Experimental builds for Ubuntu (with latest patches) available
Hi, I just pushed a new set of testing builds for various releases of Ubuntu into the cinelerra-experimental ppa. They include all the patches that were recently pushed to trunk. I also attach the collection of individual patches here. If you are interested, please test these new builds. You may find them here: https://launchpad.net/~cinelerra-ppa/+archive/cinelerra-exp If no major issues are found, I will push these to the stable PPA. Thanks, Nicola
RE: [CinCV] Fade to silence bug solved?
Grazie, Raffaella. New builds with the patch will be available in the next few days. Cheers, Nicola From: raffaella.tranie...@g-raffa.eu To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Subject: Re: [CinCV] Fade to silence bug solved? Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 10:46:23 +0200 Ciao Nicola! On 07/05/2012 06:45 PM, Nicola Ferralis wrote: Was the patch committed to the main cinelerra-cv git repo? I don't see it Here it is: http://git.cinelerra.org/gitweb?p=CinelerraCV.git;a=commit;h=fb25a311b968f8390704fb9b726b4f775662a345 Ciao! Raffaella ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
RE: [CinCV] Fade to silence bug solved?
Oh, Ok! I guess it was part of the 2.2 release. Thanks, Nicola From: raffaella.tranie...@g-raffa.eu To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Subject: Re: [CinCV] Fade to silence bug solved? Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 17:06:00 +0200 On 07/06/2012 04:48 PM, Nicola Ferralis wrote: New builds with the patch will be available in the next few days. No need. The current builds already have it. Ciao! Raffaella ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
RE: [CinCV] Fade to silence bug solved?
Hi, Was the patch committed to the main cinelerra-cv git repo? I don't see it here: http://git.cinelerra.org/gitweb?p=CinelerraCV.git Is it possible to have the patch so that I can applied it to the cinelerra ppa for Ubuntu? Thanks, Nicola From: raffaella.tranie...@g-raffa.eu To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Subject: Re: [CinCV] Fade to silence bug solved? Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 11:11:01 +0200 On 07/05/2012 09:30 AM, Einar Rünkaru wrote: http://bugs.cinelerra.org/ticket/326 Shold be fixed (commit:fb25a311) I closed the bug report. Ciao! Raffaella ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
RE: [CinCV] Cinelerra on Ubuntu Studio 12.04
Haldun,
The diff has to be outside the cinelerra-cv folder. In your case it should be
in ~/
Nicola
From: al...@wanadoo.fr
To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no
Subject: Re: [CinCV] Cinelerra on Ubuntu Studio 12.04
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 19:01:05 +0200
Thank you Nicola,
I put diff file on cinelerra-cv folder and run the command to patch
I get some erreurs still
haldun@haldunHP:~/cinelerra-cv$ patch -p0 -i
add-libraries-to-linker.diff
can't find file to patch at input line 4
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--
|diff -Nru cinelerra-2.2.orig/cinelerra/Makefile.am
cinelerra-2.2/cinelerra/Makefile.am
|--- cinelerra-2.2.orig/cinelerra/Makefile.am2011-11-13
23:53:34.0 -0500
|+++ cinelerra-2.2/cinelerra/Makefile.am2011-11-14
14:06:09.0 -0500
--
File to patch: (here the command line stops and I added the
following lines to see what happens :) add-libraries-to-linker.diff
patching file add-libraries-to-linker.diff
Hunk #1 FAILED at 677.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file
add-libraries-to-linker.diff.rej
there finishes the line
What am I supposed to do please. ?
On 16/05/2012 18:03, Nicola Ferralis wrote:
The error in compilation is a known issue in cinelerra main
source code. You need to apply the attached patch to the source.
Not sure why it hasn't been included yet on the main code.
To apply the patch, place the diff file in the same folder where
the cinelerra-2.2 source folder is, and run:
patch -p0 -i add-libraries-to-linker.diff
Then proceed with the compilation.
Regarding the faad issue, you need the -dev package: it's the
one that contains the libraries used during compilation. The
correct dependency for that is libfaad-dev
I repost below the correct list...
Cheers,
Nicola
***
debhelper
automake
fakeroot
libasound2-dev
libdv4-dev
libavcodec-dev
libmp3lame-dev
libvorbis-dev
libogg-dev
libtool
liba52-0.7.4-dev
libtheora-dev
libpng12-dev
libjpeg-dev
libtiff4-dev
libesd0-dev
libaudiofile-dev
libraw1394-dev
libavc1394-dev
libfreetype6-dev
libfontconfig1-dev
nasm
uuid-dev,
docbook-to-man
libfaad-dev
libmjpegtools-dev
libopenexr-dev
libxxf86vm-dev
libfftw3-dev
libsndfile1-dev
libiec61883-dev
libx264-dev,
libfaac-dev
libx11-dev
libxext-dev
libxft-dev
libxv-dev
libxxf86vm-dev
libglu1-mesa-dev
libv4l-dev
From: al...@wanadoo.fr
To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no
Subject: Re: [CinCV] Cinelerra on Ubuntu Studio 12.04
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 17:39:44 +0200
When checking dependencies for installation after the
commande ./configure faad librairies and headers was
missing after i installed the package libfaad-dev they were
found.
Everything seems to be in order it tells me to tape make but
fails with errors :
some parts are in french I don't know if it bothers.
haldun@haldunHP:~/cinelerra-cv$ make
(CDPATH=${ZSH_VERSION+.}: cd .
/bin/bash /home/haldun/cinelerra-cv/missing --run autoheader)
rm -f stamp-h1
touch config.h.in
cd . /bin/bash ./config.status config.h
config.status: creating config.h
config.status: config.h is unchanged
make all-recursive
make[1]: entrant dans le répertoire «
/home/haldun/cinelerra-cv »
Making all in libmpeg3
make[2]: entrant dans le répertoire «
/home/haldun/cinelerra-cv/libmpeg3 »
Making all in audio
make[3]: entrant dans le répertoire «
/home/haldun/cinelerra-cv/libmpeg3/audio »
make[3]: Rien à faire pour « all ».
make[3]: quittant le répertoire «
/home/haldun/cinelerra-cv/libmpeg3/audio »
Making all in video
make[3]: entrant dans le répertoire «
/home/haldun/cinelerra-cv/libmpeg3/video »
make[3]: Rien à faire pour « all ».
make[3]: quittant le répertoire «
/home/haldun/cinelerra-cv/libmpeg3/video »
make[3]: entrant dans le
RE: [CinCV] Cinelerra on Ubuntu Studio 12.04
Hi Haldun, The full set of required dependencies for building Cinelerra for Ubuntu 12.04 is given bellow. I hope it helps. Cheers, Nicola ** debhelper automake fakeroot libasound2-dev libdv4-dev libavcodec-dev libmp3lame-dev libvorbis-dev libogg-dev libtool liba52-0.7.4-dev libtheora-dev libpng12-dev libjpeg-dev libtiff4-dev libesd0-dev libaudiofile-dev libraw1394-dev libavc1394-dev libfreetype6-dev libfontconfig1-dev nasm uuid-dev, docbook-to-man libfaad2-dev libmjpegtools-dev libopenexr-dev libxxf86vm-dev libfftw3-dev libsndfile1-dev libiec61883-dev libx264-dev, libfaac-dev libx11-dev libxext-dev libxft-dev libxv-dev libxxf86vm-dev libglu1-mesa-dev libv4l-dev From: al...@wanadoo.fr To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Subject: Re: [CinCV] Cinelerra on Ubuntu Studio 12.04 Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 09:35:21 +0200 Hello Nicola Can we with this information for dependencies compile cinelerra for ubuntu studio 1204 ? I guess grandma has some more knittings to do :))) Thanks in advance. Haldun. On 17/04/2012 19:18, Nicola Ferralis wrote: Raffaella, make sure you correct your broken dependencies. sudo apt-get -f install As for precise, libjpeg-dev is needed: previous versions use libjpeg62-dev which is no longer in precise. Hope it helps. Nicola P.S. For successful compilation on any ubuntu (including precise) these are the dependencies (from the control file in ppa) debhelper (= 7.0.16~), automake, fakeroot, libasound2-dev (= 1.0.4), libdv4-dev (= 1.0.0), libavcodeccvs51-dev | libavcodec-dev, libmp3lame-dev | liblame-dev (= 3.92), libvorbis-dev (= 1.0.0), libogg-dev (= 1.1.2), libtool (= 1.5), liba52-0.7.4-dev (= 0.7.4), libtheora-dev (=0.0.0.alpha4) | libtheora-mmx-dev (=0.0.0.alpha4), libpng12-dev (= 1.2.5), libjpeg-dev | libjpeg62-dev, libtiff4-dev (= 3.6.0), libesd0-dev (= 0.2.28), libaudiofile-dev (= 0.2.3), libraw1394-dev (= 1.2.0), libavc1394-dev (= 0.4.1), libfreetype6-dev (= 2.2.1), libfontconfig-dev | libfontconfig1-dev, nasm, uuid-dev, docbook-to-man, libfaad2-dev | libfaad-dev, libmjpegtools-dev (= 1.6.2), libopenexr-dev (= 1.1.1), libxxf86vm-dev (=6.8.2), libfftw3-dev | fftw3-dev, libsndfile1-dev, libiec61883-dev (= 1.0.0), libx264-dev, libfaac-dev (= 1.24), libx11-dev, libxext-dev, libxft-dev, libxv-dev, libxxf86vm-dev, libfftw3-dev, libglu1-mesa-dev, libv4l-dev | v4l-utils From: raffaella.tranie...@g-raffa.eu To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Subject: [CinCV] Cinelerra on Ubuntu Studio 12.04 Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 14:01:17 +0200 Ciao! I'm trying to compile Cin on Ubuntu Studio 12.04, a clean install. I started from the Grandma instructions for Oneiric 11.10. raffa@raffa-laptop:~/cinelerra-cv$ sudo apt-get install xorg-dev libasound2-dev libogg-dev libvorbis-dev libtheora-dev libopenexr-dev libdv4-dev libpng12-dev libjpeg62-dev libx264-dev uuid-dev mjpegtools libmjpegtools-dev libfftw3-dev liba52-0.7.4-dev libmp3lame0 libmp3lame-dev libsndfile1-dev libfaac-dev libfaad-dev libesd0-dev libavc1394-dev libraw1394-dev libiec61883-dev libtiff4-dev libxxf86vm-dev libglu1-mesa-dev but I got: libmp3lame0 is already the newest version. Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: libtiff4-dev : Depends: libjpeg-dev E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. If I install libjpeg-dev I still get the same error. Have someone of you already solved the dependency issues in Ubuntu Studio 12.04? Ciao! Raffaella ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
RE: [CinCV] Cinelerra on Ubuntu Studio 12.04
You're welcome. For future reference, you may want to check the source of the debian files in the ppa... Nicola From: raffaella.tranie...@g-raffa.eu To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Subject: Re: [CinCV] Cinelerra on Ubuntu Studio 12.04 Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 02:20:37 +0200 Ciao! As for precise, libjpeg-dev is needed: previous versions use libjpeg62-dev which is no longer in precise. Thank you very much! You saved my workshop. I'll tell Grandma. :-) Ciao! Raffaella ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
RE: [CinCV] can't install cinelerra on ubuntu from repositories
Hi, You have a conflicting library installed, mpeg3-utils. I would recommend you uninstall it (assuming it is not used for other packages) and try to install cinelerra again. From: matteosistise...@gmail.com To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Subject: [CinCV] can't install cinelerra on ubuntu from repositories Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 21:52:33 +0100 Hi, I added the repository (by following the instructions from the site) and tried to install cinelerra from synaptic, but I get the following errors. Is there a way I can fix it and get it to install? thanks m. (Reading database ... 375773 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace libguicast1 1:2.2-0.3~ppa1~maverick1 (using .../libguicast1_1%3a2.2-0.3~ppa1~oneiric1_i386.deb) ... Unpacking replacement libguicast1 ... Unpacking libmpeg3cine (from .../libmpeg3cine_1%3a2.2-0.3~ppa1~oneiric1_i386.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libmpeg3cine_1%3a2.2-0.3~ppa1~oneiric1_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/mpeg3cat', which is also in package mpeg3-utils 1.5.4-5ubuntu1 No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already Selecting previously deselected package libquicktimecine. Unpacking libquicktimecine (from .../libquicktimecine_1%3a2.2-0.3~ppa1~oneiric1_i386.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package cinelerra. Unpacking cinelerra (from .../cinelerra_1%3a2.2-0.3~ppa1~oneiric1_i386.deb) ... Processing triggers for man-db ... Processing triggers for menu ... Processing triggers for bamfdaemon ... Rebuilding /usr/share/applications/bamf.index... Processing triggers for gnome-menus ... Processing triggers for desktop-file-utils ... Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/libmpeg3cine_1%3a2.2-0.3~ppa1~oneiric1_i386.deb W: Duplicate sources.list entry http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu/ oneiric/partner i386 Packages (/var/lib/apt/lists/archive.canonical.com_ubuntu_dists_oneiric_partner_binary-i386_Packages) E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) A package failed to install. Trying to recover: dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of cinelerra: cinelerra depends on libmpeg3cine (= 1:2.2-0.3~ppa1~oneiric1); however: Package libmpeg3cine is not installed. dpkg: error processing cinelerra (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured Setting up libguicast1 (1:2.2-0.3~ppa1~oneiric1) ... dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libquicktimecine: libquicktimecine depends on libmpeg3cine; however: Package libmpeg3cine is not installed. dpkg: error processing libquicktimecine (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured Processing triggers for libc-bin ... ldconfig deferred processing now taking place Errors were encountered while processing: cinelerra libquicktimecine ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
RE: [CinCV] Compiling errors with CinCV 2.2
Hi, Make sure you have the right libraries linked. See patch. Nicola From: i...@bandshed.net To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Subject: [CinCV] Compiling errors with CinCV 2.2 Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 13:07:31 -0800 Hi, I am trying to compile and package Cinelerra-CV 2.2 and encountering the following error during compilation. This is on AV Linux (based on Debian Squeeze i386). I have tried gcc 4.4 and 4.6 and also applied the latest Debian CinCV 2.1.5 patches from debian-multimedia.org all with the same result. Error is as follows: /usr/bin/ld: filempeg.o: undefined reference to symbol 'lame_encode_buffer_float' /usr/bin/ld: note: 'lame_encode_buffer_float' is defined in DSO /usr/lib/libmp3lame.so.0 so try adding it to the linker command line /usr/lib/libmp3lame.so.0: could not read symbols: Invalid operation collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[3]: *** [cinelerra] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/tester/Build/cinelerra-cv/cinelerra' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/tester/Build/cinelerra-cv/cinelerra' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/tester/Build/cinelerra-cv' make: *** [all] Error 2 tester@av502desk:~/Build/cinelerra-cv$ Any guidance appreciated, Glen MacArthur - AV Linux maintainer ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra add-libraries-to-linker.diff Description: Binary data
RE: [CinCV] [PATCH] Fix compilation on Ubuntu Oneiric (11.10)
I included the patch a while back in the debian patch folder for the ppa builds: https://launchpad.net/~cinelerra-ppa/+archive/ppa/+files/cinelerra_2.2-0.2%7Eppa1%7Eoneiric1.debian.tar.gz It works fine. Thanks, Nicola From: v...@poliforma.org To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no; eina...@smail.ee Subject: Re: [CinCV] [PATCH] Fix compilation on Ubuntu Oneiric (11.10) Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 16:32:52 +0100 sorry...late: works perfect, anyway :D vale Hi. Can anyone test attached patch on real Ubuntu Oneiric? Must compile without LDFLAGS=... cofigure parameter. Einar This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
RE: [CinCV] [PATCH] Fixed interpolation in Blur video plugin
Thanks, Einar. I pushed the patch in the ppa. Builds for Ubuntu will be available in the next few hours. Please let me know if you run into any issue. Thanks again,Nicola From: eina...@smail.ee To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Subject: [CinCV] [PATCH] Fixed interpolation in Blur video plugin Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 20:41:45 +0200 Hi Patch is attached. Linear interoplation is not applicable to on/off switch Rounding interpolated blur radius value Fix proposed by Michal Fapso michal.fa...@gmail.com Einar
[CinCV] Test packages of Cinelerra-CV 2.2 for ubuntu
Dear All, Test packages of Cinelerra-CV version 2.2 for Ubuntu will be available in the next few hours in the cinelerra experimental ppa: https://launchpad.net/~cinelerra-ppa/+archive/cinelerra-exp/+packages I'd appreciate if anybody interested could test such builds. If no major issue will rise, I will transfer them to the stable cinelerra ppa: https://launchpad.net/~cinelerra-ppa/+archive/ppa Thanks to the upstream developers for their great work. Cheers, Nicola
RE: [CinCV] Compiling Cinelerra on Ubuntu Oneiric (11.10)
Raffaella, The issues about the linker are related to the gcc 4.6, apparently. I wonder if it would be worth updating the makefile in the main tree, so people don't have to get crazy and specify tags for the linker, manually. Also, I am not sure if the debian folder inside the main tree is really up-to-date either. The changelog refers to the now very old 2.1.0 version, which makes me think that also everything else might be outdated. Nicola From: raffaella.tranie...@g-raffa.eu To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Subject: Re: [CinCV] Compiling Cinelerra on Ubuntu Oneiric (11.10) Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 23:27:23 +0100 On 11/13/2011 09:40 PM, Einar Rünkaru wrote: Try LDFLAGS='-Xlinker --add-needed' or LDFLAGS='-Xlinker --copy-dt-needed-entries' Yesss! They both worked to let me pass the configure stage. Then I met the same error Nicola met: playback3d.o: In function `Playback3D::do_mask_sync(Playback3DCommand*)': playback3d.C:(.text+0x1fd1): undefined reference to `gluNewTess' playback3d.C:(.text+0x1ff4): undefined reference to `gluTessProperty' playback3d.C:(.text+0x2012): undefined reference to `gluTessCallback' playback3d.C:(.text+0x2030): undefined reference to `gluTessCallback' playback3d.C:(.text+0x204b): undefined reference to `gluTessCallback' playback3d.C:(.text+0x2066): undefined reference to `gluTessCallback' playback3d.C:(.text+0x2114): undefined reference to `gluTessBeginPolygon' playback3d.C:(.text+0x2123): undefined reference to `gluTessBeginContour' playback3d.C:(.text+0x272b): undefined reference to `gluTessVertex' playback3d.C:(.text+0x2754): undefined reference to `gluTessEndContour' playback3d.C:(.text+0x2763): undefined reference to `gluTessEndPolygon' playback3d.C:(.text+0x27ff): undefined reference to `gluDeleteTess' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status I applied Michal's suggestion (-lGLU) http://e.kevb.net/lurker/message/20111024.054825.44580d8f.en.html making my working configure line like that: ./configure --with-buildinfo=git/recompile --enable-mmx --without-pic LDFLAGS='-Xlinker --add-needed -lGLU' I was thus able to compile Cinelerra 2.2 on Ubuntu 11.10. I can run her but the font on the interface is strange: http://g-raffa.eu/Pastebin/CinFont.png Running Cinelerra from Nicola's Launchpad package has the same effect. Any idea? Ciao! Raffaella ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
RE: [CinCV] Compiling Cinelerra on Ubuntu Oneiric (11.10)
Thanks again, Michal. Cinelerra now builds fine. Packages for Oneiric will be available in the next few hours. Thanks again, Nicola From: michal.fa...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [CinCV] Compiling Cinelerra on Ubuntu Oneiric (11.10) To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 07:48:25 +0200 You are welcome, Nicola. Now you probably need to add -lGLU to linker command line. Michal On 23 October 2011 01:42, Nicola Ferralis feran...@hotmail.com wrote: Thanks Michal. It turns out that the error is due to a change in gcc (4.5) that ships with Ubuntu, see here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/NattyNarwhal/ToolchainTransition I explicitly added the library to the makefile in cinelerra source (attached). This issue is in the source of Cinelerra, and I think the patch should be applied to the main tree (previous testing, of course). Even with the patch, I still have errors in compilation of Cinelerra under Oneiric. This time the error message is: playback3d.o: In function `Playback3D::do_mask_sync(Playback3DCommand*)': playback3d.C:(.text+0x1fd1): undefined reference to `gluNewTess' playback3d.C:(.text+0x1ff4): undefined reference to `gluTessProperty' playback3d.C:(.text+0x2012): undefined reference to `gluTessCallback' playback3d.C:(.text+0x2030): undefined reference to `gluTessCallback' playback3d.C:(.text+0x204b): undefined reference to `gluTessCallback' playback3d.C:(.text+0x2066): undefined reference to `gluTessCallback' playback3d.C:(.text+0x2114): undefined reference to `gluTessBeginPolygon' playback3d.C:(.text+0x2123): undefined reference to `gluTessBeginContour' playback3d.C:(.text+0x272b): undefined reference to `gluTessVertex' playback3d.C:(.text+0x2754): undefined reference to `gluTessEndContour' playback3d.C:(.text+0x2763): undefined reference to `gluTessEndPolygon' playback3d.C:(.text+0x27ff): undefined reference to `gluDeleteTess' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status Suggestions? Thanks again, Nicola From: michal.fa...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [CinCV] Compiling Cinelerra on Ubuntu Oneiric (11.10) To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 07:55:50 +0200 It seems that you need to add -lmp3lame to the linker command line. A similar issue is described here: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3476869/g-linker-usr-lib-libgl-so-1-could-not-read-symbols-invalid-operation Michal On 21 October 2011 07:15, Nicola Ferralis feran...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi, thanks for the response, the error was due to an improper use of a flag during compilation. I still have issues though (and this has been going on for a while in my builds for Oneiric), which seem related to libmp3lame: Here's the error log: /usr/bin/ld: filempeg.o: undefined reference to symbol 'lame_encode_buffer_float' /usr/bin/ld: note: 'lame_encode_buffer_float' is defined in DSO /usr/lib/libmp3lame.so.0 so try adding it to the linker command line /usr/lib/libmp3lame.so.0: could not read symbols: Invalid operation collect2: ld returned 1 exit status Did anybody encounter this error? Any suggestions on how to deal with this? Thanks again, Nicola From: michal.fa...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [CinCV] Compiling Cinelerra on Ubuntu Oneiric (11.10) To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 07:31:52 +0200 Hi Nicola, try to look inside the config.log ...there should be more details about the problem or send the whole file here. Michal On 20 October 2011 06:02, Nicola Ferralis feran...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi, I keep having compilation issues of my ubuntu packages, in what seems a configuration issue. Essentially the error message in the compile log looks like this: checking whether the C compiler works... no configure: error: in `/build/buildd/cinelerra-2.1.5': configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables Ubuntu 11.10 uses gcc 4.6, I wonder if anybody experienced similar issues with it. Thanks for any insight, Nicola ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
RE: [CinCV] Compiling Cinelerra on Ubuntu Oneiric (11.10)
Thanks Michal. It turns out that the error is due to a change in gcc (4.5) that ships with Ubuntu, see here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/NattyNarwhal/ToolchainTransition I explicitly added the library to the makefile in cinelerra source (attached). This issue is in the source of Cinelerra, and I think the patch should be applied to the main tree (previous testing, of course). Even with the patch, I still have errors in compilation of Cinelerra under Oneiric. This time the error message is: playback3d.o: In function `Playback3D::do_mask_sync(Playback3DCommand*)': playback3d.C:(.text+0x1fd1): undefined reference to `gluNewTess' playback3d.C:(.text+0x1ff4): undefined reference to `gluTessProperty' playback3d.C:(.text+0x2012): undefined reference to `gluTessCallback' playback3d.C:(.text+0x2030): undefined reference to `gluTessCallback' playback3d.C:(.text+0x204b): undefined reference to `gluTessCallback' playback3d.C:(.text+0x2066): undefined reference to `gluTessCallback' playback3d.C:(.text+0x2114): undefined reference to `gluTessBeginPolygon' playback3d.C:(.text+0x2123): undefined reference to `gluTessBeginContour' playback3d.C:(.text+0x272b): undefined reference to `gluTessVertex' playback3d.C:(.text+0x2754): undefined reference to `gluTessEndContour' playback3d.C:(.text+0x2763): undefined reference to `gluTessEndPolygon' playback3d.C:(.text+0x27ff): undefined reference to `gluDeleteTess' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status Suggestions? Thanks again, Nicola From: michal.fa...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [CinCV] Compiling Cinelerra on Ubuntu Oneiric (11.10) To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 07:55:50 +0200 It seems that you need to add -lmp3lame to the linker command line. A similar issue is described here: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3476869/g-linker-usr-lib-libgl-so-1-could-not-read-symbols-invalid-operation Michal On 21 October 2011 07:15, Nicola Ferralis feran...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi, thanks for the response, the error was due to an improper use of a flag during compilation. I still have issues though (and this has been going on for a while in my builds for Oneiric), which seem related to libmp3lame: Here's the error log: /usr/bin/ld: filempeg.o: undefined reference to symbol 'lame_encode_buffer_float' /usr/bin/ld: note: 'lame_encode_buffer_float' is defined in DSO /usr/lib/libmp3lame.so.0 so try adding it to the linker command line /usr/lib/libmp3lame.so.0: could not read symbols: Invalid operation collect2: ld returned 1 exit status Did anybody encounter this error? Any suggestions on how to deal with this? Thanks again, Nicola From: michal.fa...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [CinCV] Compiling Cinelerra on Ubuntu Oneiric (11.10) To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 07:31:52 +0200 Hi Nicola, try to look inside the config.log ...there should be more details about the problem or send the whole file here. Michal On 20 October 2011 06:02, Nicola Ferralis feran...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi, I keep having compilation issues of my ubuntu packages, in what seems a configuration issue. Essentially the error message in the compile log looks like this: checking whether the C compiler works... no configure: error: in `/build/buildd/cinelerra-2.1.5': configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables Ubuntu 11.10 uses gcc 4.6, I wonder if anybody experienced similar issues with it. Thanks for any insight, Nicola ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra diff -Nru cinelerra.orig//cinelerra/Makefile.am cinelerra/cinelerra/Makefile.am --- cinelerra.orig//cinelerra/Makefile.am 2010-11-24 18:18:03.0 -0500 +++ cinelerra/cinelerra/Makefile.am 2011-10-22 18:58:12.395221105 -0400 @@ -683,7 +683,7 @@ $(XIPH_LIBS) \ $(A52DEC_LIBS) \ $(OPENEXR_LIBS) \ - -lsndfile \ + -lsndfile -lmp3lame\ -lpng -ljpeg -ltiff -lz \ $(SOUND_LDFLAGS) \ $(FIREWIRE_LDFLAGS) \
RE: [CinCV] Compiling Cinelerra on Ubuntu Oneiric (11.10)
Hi, thanks for the response, the error was due to an improper use of a flag during compilation. I still have issues though (and this has been going on for a while in my builds for Oneiric), which seem related to libmp3lame: Here's the error log: /usr/bin/ld: filempeg.o: undefined reference to symbol 'lame_encode_buffer_float' /usr/bin/ld: note: 'lame_encode_buffer_float' is defined in DSO /usr/lib/libmp3lame.so.0 so try adding it to the linker command line /usr/lib/libmp3lame.so.0: could not read symbols: Invalid operation collect2: ld returned 1 exit status Did anybody encounter this error? Any suggestions on how to deal with this? Thanks again, Nicola From: michal.fa...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [CinCV] Compiling Cinelerra on Ubuntu Oneiric (11.10) To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 07:31:52 +0200 Hi Nicola, try to look inside the config.log ...there should be more details about the problem or send the whole file here. Michal On 20 October 2011 06:02, Nicola Ferralis feran...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi, I keep having compilation issues of my ubuntu packages, in what seems a configuration issue. Essentially the error message in the compile log looks like this: checking whether the C compiler works... no configure: error: in `/build/buildd/cinelerra-2.1.5': configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables Ubuntu 11.10 uses gcc 4.6, I wonder if anybody experienced similar issues with it. Thanks for any insight, Nicola ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
[CinCV] Compiling Cinelerra on Ubuntu Oneiric (11.10)
Hi, I keep having compilation issues of my ubuntu packages, in what seems a configuration issue. Essentially the error message in the compile log looks like this: checking whether the C compiler works... no configure: error: in `/build/buildd/cinelerra-2.1.5': configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables Ubuntu 11.10 uses gcc 4.6, I wonder if anybody experienced similar issues with it. Thanks for any insight, Nicola
RE: [CinCV] AV Linux and it's 'non-GPL' license
Glen, Please don't feel you're under any pressure, or attack. GPL issues are far from being clear to everybody. I'd just like to add that I have doubts you can re-license the GPL components (which are essentially Debian, so GPL v2), into GPL v3. Can anybody confirm this? Nicola Subject: Re: [CinCV] AV Linux and it's 'non-GPL' license From: i...@bandshed.net To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2011 14:29:33 -0700 Eeesh! Joining this list has been both uncomfortable and educational at the same time...is everyone greeted with such 'hospitality'?...lol OK, so what about this: AV Linux goes GPL(3) and I issue a disclaimer statement declaring which EXACT packages are 'non-free' but come bundled with the ISO and clearly state that the declared non-free packages must be removed in order to redistribute AV Linux... Will this appease the powers that be? In all seriousness thanks for the feedback, -GLEN Well I'm not a lawyer either so we have something in common! Hi Glen and the others, likewise, I'll join the club of non-lawyers discussing legal issues ;-) Am 05.10.2011 00:41, schrieb i...@bandshed.net: I've been distributing AV Linux like this since 2007 and ... but I was under the impression that any derived work could be licensed outside of the GPL provided the source code of the derived work was made available upon request. This impression is simply wrong. You just had the luck that no one sued you. This matter isn't difficult. Any confusion boils down to being precise with the term derived work. If you want to license a derived work *outside* the GPL, then you need to negotiate with *each* contributor to the GPLed work to get you an *separate* usage agreement for his/her code *independent* of that code being published also under the GPL. If you can't do that, the GPL as it stands is crisp and clear. *You* use GPLed content to build your derived work. This implies that *you* comply to the GPL beforehand. And the GPL dictates that every derived work has to be *licensed again under the GPL*. End of the discussion. This is what often is referred to as the infectious or viral property of the GPL. Other licenses (e.g. the Apache License) are deliberately different and do not employ this strict ruling. The 'source code' is the ISO image... Sorry, no. Source code is source code is source code. This isn't a matter for interpretation. Source code is an textual or similarly editable representation from which you can re-create your whole delivery. There is an absolutely simple criterion: What everyone can rebuild from the accessible source code, needs to be equivalent to what you distribute in binary form (including all your modifications). Btw: that exactly was the reason why GPL doesn't play well for distributing media content. That's one of the reasons, why we have the CreativeCommons licenses. and of course the GPL content of Debian has it's source code freely available as well. Regardless the icluded closed source content falls outside of the GPL and there is no law forbidding me to distribute it on an ISO of my making providing I have the permission of the developers which I do. What you do here is compiling several products into a distribution. That is another matter altogether. Indeed you're free to do so. The key distinguishing point is if you just ship independent pieces together, as opposed to combining GPLed and non-GPLed code into a new product. If you do the latter, the GPL rulez! But you're always free to do the former (just shipping together). Just in that case you need to make clear to your users that they get content with two different licenses, and, because you're distributing GPLed content as part of your distribution, *you* need to make the source code for that GPLed content available. It doesn't suffice that you state that everyone interested can get the source code from somewhere. *You* need to provide it. The GPL-2 even contains some rules on how, and how much you're allowed to charge for e.g. mailing an CD with source code to a user requesting that from you. The GPL-2 is very outdated in that respect, indeed. If I recall correct, only the GPL-3 contains a ruling that it is sufficient to publish an URL to a net server holding the full and exact source code, and that you're not bound to ship floppies to some bozo in Mongolia where there is no internet access. Nevertheless, even with the GPL-3, you need to assure that that net server is reasonably accessible. To elaborate on that point: Debian doesn't keep an archive of superseded source code versions. If you e.g. base your code modifications on some library in Debian/oldstable, some years ahead that basic code won't be accessible from Debian anymore. If you hit an evil spirited lawyer, you can get a lot of
RE: [CinCV] AV Linux and it's 'non-GPL' license
Glen, Thanks for the clarifications. Although I am not a lawyer, I have doubts about the fact that the license in AV linux can be changed at the developer's convenience, since it still is derived work. The GPL specifically says that derived work qualifies for the GPL license itself. LGPL is more relaxed in these terms. But the fact that AV linux is distributed with a non GPL license, while most of its components are, it looks to me as a potential violation of the license itself. Again, I am not a lawyer, and I am just trying to understand the situation. Thanks again, Nicola From: i...@bandshed.net To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Subject: [CinCV] AV Linux and it's 'non-GPL' license Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 10:41:12 -0700 Hi fellow CinCV'ers I recently was browsing the mail archives here and noticed some concern over the AV Linux 5.0 release announcement I posted here in June. My sincere apologies for not replying, at the time I was not a Cinelerra mailing list subscriber so any replies to my announcement didn't come back to me. Hopefully I can clarify what 'non-GPL' means in reference to AV Linux for those on the list who care to know... AV Linux is a multimedia focused distro and contains both excellent Open-Source programs and also Commercial Linux Audio Plugins and Sequencers that are presented as demos. I personally am not a very political Linux user and enjoy both open and closed Linux software so I made arrangements with each individual developer/vendor of the commercial applications to include the demo versions in AV Linux. The terms of the demo licenses were that I could distribute them in AV Linux however someone could not re-distribute AV Linux as-is without violating those licenses. This is why AV Linux is non-GPL because it can't be redistributed as-is. However AV Linux with all the commercial demos removed is simply a heavily tweaked and customized Debian Squeeze and would be GPL like the software it contains. I am a huge fan of Cinelerra and would very much like to use my AV Linux distribution to promote and further it's use as well as it's contemporaries. I take a personal interest in it and have recently done a lot of behind the scenes configuration work to make easier for new users in the next AV Linux release. I sincerely hope that this post clears up any confusion or concern about my intentions. Best Regards, Glen MacArthur - AV Linux Maintainer ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
RE: [CinCV] More on testing
Hi, I would like to just add a quick note regarding the cinelerra-ppa repository for Ubuntu (which I maintain). These packages will be updated only after cinelerra 2.2 has stabilized and the official cinelerraCV-2.2 will be released. Thanks, Nicola From: raffaella.tranie...@g-raffa.eu To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Subject: [CinCV] More on testing Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 10:10:08 +0200 Ciao to all of you! And a special ciao to the testers! Here are some more tips for testing: NEW AND OLD BUGS We are now focussing on the bugs created by the changes: - Bézier Automation - compilation on 2.6.38+ kernels, v4l and buz drivers Please, test and report back to this mailing list about bugs created by those changes. If during testing you find other old bugs, treat them separately. If the bug is not already reported to the bugtracker, please create a new ticket with as much details as you can. Bugtracker: http://bugs.cinelerra.org/ BEZIER AUTOMATION To know which changes are made by the Bezier patch, you can have a look at the patch documentation: http://ichthyostega.de/cinelerra/bezier-patch/ COMPILATION ON UBUNTU No packages will be available for testing because compilation is one of the processes that needs testing. Compilation is supposed to be easy and successful also for newbies. It will take about 20'. If Cinelerra doesn't compile, then the testing was successful in finding a bug. :-) For compiling on any Ubuntu follow the instructions at http://www.g-raffa.eu/Cinelerra/HOWTO/compilation.html Just some notes on those instructions: 1. Don't get the current code. Instead get the source code from http://git.cinelerra.org/gitweb?p=CinelerraCV.git;a=snapshot;h=77f464b5dafd2c441ccc55282a9489250b83306f;sf=tgz 2. Ignore the note For Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narval about Video for Linux version 1 (V4L1). This code is supposed to work with no need for patches. 3. If you have a 64bit system, don't forget to use the configure options for 64bit systems: ./configure --with-buildinfo=git/recompile 4. Those compilation commands don't enable OpenGL. If compilation goes wrong, post the last lines (with the error) of the terminal output to the list. Happy testing! :-) Ciao Raffaella ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
RE: [CinCV] Compile error with kernel 3.0
It should be: patch -p0 -i remove-support-v4l-buzz-3.diff BTW, any hope t see this merged into the main tree? Regards, NF Subject: Re: [CinCV] Compile error with kernel 3.0 From: eina...@smail.ee To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 16:27:45 +0300 On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Paolo Valtorta paolo.valto...@gmail.com wrote: I've downloaded the patch remove-support-v4l-buzz-3.diff for recompile cinelerra-cv with kernel 3.0, but I don't understand the command for apply the patch. I trougth with patch -i remove-support-v4l-buzz-3.diff but the result is: Command is: patch -p1 remove-support-v4l-buzz-3.diff Einar ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
RE: Re : [CinCV] Ubuntu and cinelerra 4.2
As I mentioned in my previous reply (I think...) you can adapt the patch for Cinelerra 2.1.5 to make it work with Cinelerra 4.2... See here: http://www.mail-archive.com/cinelerra@skolelinux.no/msg12641.html or the file attached (again, keep in mind that it's for Cinelerra 2.1.5, so you might need to manually modify/apply the patch). Nicola From: laurent_w...@yahoo.fr To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Subject: Re : [CinCV] Ubuntu and cinelerra 4.2 Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 08:30:20 +0400 Hi, I'm back and there's another problem at the make stage : in the cinelerra directory, make finished with an error : make[2]: entrant dans le répertoire « /home/laurent/Téléchargements/cinelerra-4.2/cinelerra » g++ -c `cat i686/c_flags` vdevicebuz.C -o i686/vdevicebuz.o vdevicebuz.C:48:28: fatal error: linux/videodev.h: Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type compilation terminated. make[2]: *** [i686/vdevicebuz.o] Erreur 1 make[2]: quittant le répertoire « /home/laurent/Téléchargements/cinelerra-4.2/cinelerra » It seems to be the same problem like the mjpegtools : the lack of linux/videodev.h in the last kernel (for mjpegtools I found a patch to solve the problem). Any issues for this last error? The result is that there's no cinelerra executable after the make command. Le 20/07/2011 19:54, Laurent HOAREAU a écrit : OK Nicola, I tried the replace solution and the make step finished fine. I don't try the make install step because I try to make it whith checkinstall... Le 20/07/2011 09:07, Nicola Ferralis a écrit : Or you can also follow the suggestion of a simpler method, in comment #4, from the same link I posted previously. (I would still recommend the replacement of the library as it provides a compilation against a much newer library). Nicola From: feran...@hotmail.com To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Subject: RE: Re : [CinCV] Ubuntu and cinelerra 4.2 Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 22:03:40 -0700 The issue is within the version of faad2 included in Cinelerra 4.2, which is obsolete. I had success in the past by simply drop replacement of faad (in the folder you reported) using a more recent version. To make it work, however, I had to rename the folder as the old one, faad2-2.0. More details and howto here (comment #5): http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=2944664group_id=13554atid=113554 Also note that the issue, apparently, is only present in the 32bit version of Ubuntu, 64bit is fine. Also this is not an issue for Ubuntu but also for other distros. I hope it helps. Nicola From: laurent_w...@yahoo.fr Subject: Re : [CinCV] Ubuntu and cinelerra 4.2 To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 05:26:09 +0100 I tried to install the 4.2 version on Ubuntu 10.04. But I've got errors at the make. I think that I have the good dependencies. In facts, I followed these instructions : http://sideways.bplaced.net/en/sachkunde/cinelerra-4-2-unter-ubuntu-kompilieren/ I make the modifications at the file cinelerra-4.2/quicktime/thirdparty/faad2-2.0/libfaad/common.h. But I still have problems : if /bin/bash ../../libtool --mode=compile g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I../../include -D_REENTRANT -DNOCONTROLS -fexceptions -g -O2 -MT faad2.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/faad2.Tpo -c -o faad2.lo faad2.cpp; \ then mv -f .deps/faad2.Tpo .deps/faad2.Plo; else rm -f .deps/faad2.Tpo; exit 1; fi g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I../../include -D_REENTRANT -DNOCONTROLS -fexceptions -g -O2 -MT faad2.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/faad2.Tpo -c faad2.cpp -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/faad2.o In file included from faad2.cpp:21: faad2.h:28:26: error: codec_plugin.h: No such file or directory faad2.cpp:22:32: error
RE: [CinCV] cinelerra 4,2 and cv 2,1,5
Thanks, Hermann for the very good insight of the evolution of Cinelerra development. I wonder what are really the main differences that have been introduced in Cinelerra-CV compared to the most close version of upstream (2.1?). That might put in perspective what exactly is needed to take Cinelerra-HW 4.2 into CV. Thanks again, Nicola From: p...@ichthyostega.de To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Subject: Re: [CinCV] cinelerra 4,2 and cv 2,1,5 Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 01:08:13 +0200 Am 20.07.2011 18:12, schrieb Haldun ALTAN: I followed the discussion about installing cinelerra 4,2 on ubuntu 10,04 Following grandma's way. I just wanted to know if we can have the two version together ? Is there any conflict or tips to avoid them ? Hi Haldun, do you mean: installing HV-Version4.2 and CV-2.1.5 simultaneously on the same system? That's dangerous or even impossible, because Cinelerra loads parts of the code as dynamic library, which might lead to mixing up code from both versions in an unpredictable manner. (It depends very much on minute details of your setup if this works or causes problems). or did you mean: Why can't we just create a version which joins both codebases togther and gives us the best of both worlds? Indeed, that's a bit depressing. It *would* be possible and for sure would bring ahead the Cinelerra community by a large step. Unfortunately doing so requires some amount of work. Work, which is not exciting, just rewarding in the sense of having achieved something. Judging from my gut feelings, I'd guess that to be about one week of full time developer work. What puzzles me is, this just doesn't happen since some years now. And what's yet more surprising is, that -- for earlier versions, like 2.0 or 2.1, it *did* happen. The breaking point, where this changed was around 2007, if I recall correct. But I'm still at a loss, when it comes to understanding what actually changed? Was the community more vibrant at those good old times? Did Cinelerra look more attractive in those years? Was there a change in the general Opensource culture?? Hermann V. ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
RE: [CinCV] Ubuntu and cinelerra 4.2
If you have the correct dependencies installed, Cinelerra 4.2 installs fine on 10.04 (as well as 10.10). It doesn't, however, if you run 11.04, due to some changes in the kernel. While a patch for Cinelerra-CV 2.1.5: https://launchpad.net/~cinelerra-ppa/+archive/ppa I haven't ported it to 4.2. It's in my plans. However, currently the lack of access to Natty 11.04 will prevent me from doing so for a while. Nicola rant Apologies for the rant that follows. I am still running 10.10 in my laptop, as 11.04 is horribly buggy and essentially unusable in my laptop. It is by far the worst Ubuntu release ever for me. I have no time or desire to compensate for such limitations by creating a virtual instance of it./rant To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no From: laurent_w...@yahoo.fr Subject: [CinCV] Ubuntu and cinelerra 4.2 Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 06:05:12 +0400 HI everyone. Did anyone try to install cinelerra 4.2 from sources? I tried on ubuntu 10.04 with no sucess. Tanks for any ideas...
RE: Re : [CinCV] Ubuntu and cinelerra 4.2
The issue is within the version of faad2 included in Cinelerra 4.2, which is obsolete. I had success in the past by simply drop replacement of faad (in the folder you reported) using a more recent version. To make it work, however, I had to rename the folder as the old one, faad2-2.0. More details and howto here (comment #5): http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=2944664group_id=13554atid=113554 Also note that the issue, apparently, is only present in the 32bit version of Ubuntu, 64bit is fine. Also this is not an issue for Ubuntu but also for other distros. I hope it helps.Nicola From: laurent_w...@yahoo.fr Subject: Re : [CinCV] Ubuntu and cinelerra 4.2 To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 05:26:09 +0100 I tried to install the 4.2 version on Ubuntu 10.04. But I've got errors at the make. I think that I have the good dependencies. In facts, I followed these instructions : http://sideways.bplaced.net/en/sachkunde/cinelerra-4-2-unter-ubuntu-kompilieren/ I make the modifications at the file cinelerra-4.2/quicktime/thirdparty/faad2-2.0/libfaad/common.h. But I still have problems : if /bin/bash ../../libtool --mode=compile g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I../../include -D_REENTRANT -DNOCONTROLS -fexceptions -g -O2 -MT faad2.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/faad2.Tpo -c -o faad2.lo faad2.cpp; \ then mv -f .deps/faad2.Tpo .deps/faad2.Plo; else rm -f .deps/faad2.Tpo; exit 1; fi g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I../../include -D_REENTRANT -DNOCONTROLS -fexceptions -g -O2 -MT faad2.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/faad2.Tpo -c faad2.cpp -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/faad2.o In file included from faad2.cpp:21: faad2.h:28:26: error: codec_plugin.h: No such file or directory faad2.cpp:22:32: error: mpeg4_audio_config.h: No such file or directory faad2.cpp:23:23: error: mpeg4_sdp.h: No such file or directory In file included from faad2.cpp:21: faad2.h:36: error: 'codec_data_t' does not name a type faad2.h:37: error: ISO C++ forbids declaration of 'audio_vft_t' with no type faad2.h:37: error: expected ';' before '*' token faad2.h:55: error: ISO C++ forbids declaration of 'FILE' with no type faad2.h:55: error: expected ';' before '*' token faad2.h:70: error: variable or field 'aac_close' declared void faad2.h:70: error: 'codec_data_t' was not declared in this scope faad2.h:70: error: 'ptr' was not declared in this scope faad2.h:73: error: expected constructor, destructor, or type conversion before '*' token faad2.h:82: error: 'codec_data_t' was not declared in this scope faad2.h:82: error: 'ifptr' was not declared in this scope faad2.h:83: error: expected primary-expression before '*' token faad2.h:83: error: 'buffer' was not declared in this scope faad2.h:84: error: expected primary-expression before '*' token faad2.h:84: error: 'ts' was not declared in this scope faad2.h:84: error: initializer expression list treated as compound expression faad2.h:85: error: 'codec_data_t' was not declared in this scope faad2.h:85: error: 'ifptr' was not declared in this scope faad2.h:87: error: variable or field 'aac_file_used_for_frame' declared void faad2.h:87: error: 'codec_data_t' was not declared in this scope faad2.h:87: error: 'ifptr' was not declared in this scope faad2.h:88: error: expected primary-expression before 'bytes' faad2.h:90: error: 'codec_data_t' was not declared in this scope faad2.h:90: error: 'ifptr' was not declared in this scope faad2.h:91: error: expected primary-expression before 'ts' faad2.h:91: error: initializer expression list treated as compound expression faad2.cpp:38: error: expected initializer before '*' token make[6]: *** [faad2.lo] Erreur 1 make[6]: quittant le répertoire « /home/laurenth/Téléchargements/cinelerra-4.2/quicktime/thirdparty/faad2-2.0/plugins/mpeg4ip » make[5]: *** [all-recursive] Erreur 1 make[5]: quittant le répertoire « /home/laurenth/Téléchargements/cinelerra-4.2/quicktime/thirdparty/faad2-2.0/plugins » make[4]: *** [all-recursive] Erreur 1 make[4]: quittant le répertoire « /home/laurenth/Téléchargements/cinelerra-4.2/quicktime/thirdparty/faad2-2.0 » make[3]: *** [all] Erreur 2 make[3]: quittant le répertoire « /home/laurenth/Téléchargements/cinelerra-4.2/quicktime/thirdparty/faad2-2.0 » make[2]: *** [i686/faad] Erreur 2 make[2]: quittant le répertoire « /home/laurenth/Téléchargements/cinelerra-4.2/quicktime » make[1]: *** [all] Erreur 2 make[1]: quittant le répertoire « /home/laurenth/Téléchargements/cinelerra-4.2 » make: *** [all] Erreur 2 laurenth@RESIR9-U:~/Téléchargements/cinelerra-4.2$ ^C laurenth@RESIR9-U:~/Téléchargements/cinelerra-4.2$ and effectively, no codec_plugin.h anywhere... So, where can I find this file? Is it a problem of dependencies? I tried to install the devel libraries that cinelerra tried to compile. But no success... Any Ideas? De : Nicola Ferralis feran...@hotmail.com À : cinelerra@skolelinux.no Envoyé le : Mer 20 juillet 2011, 7h 48min 05s Objet : RE: [CinCV] Ubuntu and cinelerra 4.2
RE: [CinCV] Cinelerra HV 4.2 remove-support-v4l-buzz-3-cinelerra4-2.diff
Just a clarification: the original poster asked for a patch for cinelerra 4.2 HV, not for CV 2.1.5. My original patch was a rushed up version from that for cinelerra CV. I am traveling right now, and have no time to make a better patch for HV 4.2. I will post here a revised patch later next week. Nicola Subject: Re: [CinCV] Cinelerra HV 4.2 remove-support-v4l-buzz-3-cinelerra4-2.diff From: raf...@riseup.net To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 07:19:39 -0700 Hi Raffaella, For sure, I can help to review/apply patches in my free time. Cheers, Rafael Diniz Hi Rafael! Nobody applied any of the proposed patches? Applied where? At the moment we have only personal repos. We miss an official CinCV repo, because we miss the human resources needed to maintain it. The present archive for patches is the mailing list. This is not a very effective system. During recent dev meetings we proposed a change: https://init.linpro.no/pipermail/skolelinux.no/cinelerra/2011-June/017934.html Are you interested in collaborating? Ciao Raffaella ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
RE: [CinCV] Windows version of Cinelerra
VirtualBox is also another fine virtual machine option. Free both as in beer and speech (i.e. most of it is opensource). Nicola From: e...@billauer.co.il To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Subject: Re: [CinCV] Windows version of Cinelerra Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2011 21:15:22 +0300 If you're really into it, try downloading VMPlayer for Windows, and run some Linux on it. And then Cinelerra on the Linux machine. http://www.vmware.com/products/player/ It's free (as in free beer) and my guess is that it'll work pretty well. But I haven't tried it myself. But beware of large files ( 2 GB) Eli Bobalina Corncob wrote: Are you guys working on making a Windows Version of Cinelerra or is it just only going to be for Linux OS.Please reply back. -- Web: http://www.billauer.co.il
RE: [CinCV] CinelerraCV 2.1.5 back in AV Linux 5.0
Glen, Reading from the main page of AVLinux: AV Linux is a non-GPL custom shop modded and rodded Linux based Operating System built from a hand-picked selection of available tools including Debian/GNU Linux Can you clarify what non-GPL actually means? Furthermore, I don't see anywhere any link to the source code, but maybe I just missed it... Thanks for any insight. Regards,Nicola From: i...@bandshed.net To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Subject: [CinCV] CinelerraCV 2.1.5 back in AV Linux 5.0 Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:18:23 -0700 Hi Cinelerra folks! Just a quick note to let you know that AV Linux 5.0 has been released and now features Cinelerra 2.1.5CV. The previous AV Linux 4.2 had Cinelerra 4.2HV. On the Cinelerra site AV Linux is listed with LXDE and XFCE desktops however for quite some time it has only had the LXDE Desktop. Just passing that along if you are interested in updating the info at CinelerraCV. Thaks for all your hard work and promotion of Cinelerra! AV Linux website: http://www.bandshed.net/AVLinux.html Best Regards, Glen MacArthur - AV Linux Maintainer ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
RE: [CinCV] v4l1 patch, try2
Rafael, thanks again for the patch. The last version sounds reasonable. I upload test builds in the PPA with it. Regarding the preloading of libv4lcompat, I handle that directly within the package (by requiring installation of the proper library). It'd be great if people with v4l-needing hardware could test it, once it's available. Thanks again, Nicola Subject: Re: [CinCV] v4l1 patch, try2 From: raf...@riseup.net To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 10:06:44 -0700 People, Thinking a little, after Einar email, I reached a patch that: - keeps v4l support as always for people using kernel = 2.6.37 - keeps v4l support for people using kernel = 2.6.38, needs LD_PRELOAD'ing of libv4l1compat.so - cinelerra compiles fine with and without libv4l - adds videodev.h to our tree ; ) Hi Einar, I must disagree with you. If you take a look at the old videodev.h, there is this statement: * Video for Linux version 1 - OBSOLETE * * Header file for v4l1 drivers and applications, for * Linux kernels 2.2.x or 2.4.x. * * Provides header for legacy drivers and applications And now it's gone. There is no such device you're saying that have only v4l1 driver. V4L1 is not present in kernel for a long long time (only the V4L1 compatibility layer was there). Anyone using kernel 2.4? IMHO, the correct way to support V4L1 is using libv4l. Of course we could commit videodev.h inside our cinelerra tree in order to get rid of the libv4l dependency for those still using kernel = 2.6.37 or that don't need V4L support at all. Best regards, Rafael Diniz Hi. You must not unconditionally remove v4l1 support. I think that configure must detect v4l1 and if it does not exist use libv4l1. There may be some older devices, that have only v4l1 drivers. We have to leave user an option to use older kernel with v4l1 support. Option to fully remove v4l1 would be nice too. Einar ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
RE: [CinCV] v4l1 patch, try2
Hi Rafael, the version packaged in the PPA is designed so that the binary of cinelerra isn't launched directly, but through a script that hadles some localization issues. I added the extra line there, so the user will run the the LD_PRELOAD every time cinelerra is launched. I know this isn't perfect, as many people would not want to have it. But the script can be modified to remove that extra line Best, Nicola Subject: RE: [CinCV] v4l1 patch, try2 From: raf...@riseup.net To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 11:12:48 -0700 Hi Nicola, Just as curiosity, how do you handle LD_PRELOAD from within the package? Best regards, Rafael Diniz Rafael, thanks again for the patch. The last version sounds reasonable. I upload test builds in the PPA with it. Regarding the preloading of libv4lcompat, I handle that directly within the package (by requiring installation of the proper library). It'd be great if people with v4l-needing hardware could test it, once it's available. Thanks again, Nicola Subject: Re: [CinCV] v4l1 patch, try2 From: raf...@riseup.net To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 10:06:44 -0700 People, Thinking a little, after Einar email, I reached a patch that: - keeps v4l support as always for people using kernel = 2.6.37 - keeps v4l support for people using kernel = 2.6.38, needs LD_PRELOAD'ing of libv4l1compat.so - cinelerra compiles fine with and without libv4l - adds videodev.h to our tree ; ) Hi Einar, I must disagree with you. If you take a look at the old videodev.h, there is this statement: * Video for Linux version 1 - OBSOLETE * * Header file for v4l1 drivers and applications, for * Linux kernels 2.2.x or 2.4.x. * * Provides header for legacy drivers and applications And now it's gone. There is no such device you're saying that have only v4l1 driver. V4L1 is not present in kernel for a long long time (only the V4L1 compatibility layer was there). Anyone using kernel 2.4? IMHO, the correct way to support V4L1 is using libv4l. Of course we could commit videodev.h inside our cinelerra tree in order to get rid of the libv4l dependency for those still using kernel = 2.6.37 or that don't need V4L support at all. Best regards, Rafael Diniz Hi. You must not unconditionally remove v4l1 support. I think that configure must detect v4l1 and if it does not exist use libv4l1. There may be some older devices, that have only v4l1 drivers. We have to leave user an option to use older kernel with v4l1 support. Option to fully remove v4l1 would be nice too. Einar ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
RE: [CinCV] v4l1 patch, try2
For anyone interested in testing the new patch, it is currently in the experimental branch of the Cinelerra-ppa for Ubuntu (natty only at the moment): https://launchpad.net/~cinelerra-ppa/+archive/cinelerra-exp Thanks in advance for anybody willing to test it (in particular the v4l performance). Best, Nicola From: feran...@hotmail.com To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Subject: RE: [CinCV] v4l1 patch, try2 Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 17:01:40 -0700 Hi Rafael, the version packaged in the PPA is designed so that the binary of cinelerra isn't launched directly, but through a script that hadles some localization issues. I added the extra line there, so the user will run the the LD_PRELOAD every time cinelerra is launched. I know this isn't perfect, as many people would not want to have it. But the script can be modified to remove that extra line Best, Nicola Subject: RE: [CinCV] v4l1 patch, try2 From: raf...@riseup.net To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 11:12:48 -0700 Hi Nicola, Just as curiosity, how do you handle LD_PRELOAD from within the package? Best regards, Rafael Diniz Rafael, thanks again for the patch. The last version sounds reasonable. I upload test builds in the PPA with it. Regarding the preloading of libv4lcompat, I handle that directly within the package (by requiring installation of the proper library). It'd be great if people with v4l-needing hardware could test it, once it's available. Thanks again, Nicola Subject: Re: [CinCV] v4l1 patch, try2 From: raf...@riseup.net To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 10:06:44 -0700 People, Thinking a little, after Einar email, I reached a patch that: - keeps v4l support as always for people using kernel = 2.6.37 - keeps v4l support for people using kernel = 2.6.38, needs LD_PRELOAD'ing of libv4l1compat.so - cinelerra compiles fine with and without libv4l - adds videodev.h to our tree ; ) Hi Einar, I must disagree with you. If you take a look at the old videodev.h, there is this statement: * Video for Linux version 1 - OBSOLETE * * Header file for v4l1 drivers and applications, for * Linux kernels 2.2.x or 2.4.x. * * Provides header for legacy drivers and applications And now it's gone. There is no such device you're saying that have only v4l1 driver. V4L1 is not present in kernel for a long long time (only the V4L1 compatibility layer was there). Anyone using kernel 2.4? IMHO, the correct way to support V4L1 is using libv4l. Of course we could commit videodev.h inside our cinelerra tree in order to get rid of the libv4l dependency for those still using kernel = 2.6.37 or that don't need V4L support at all. Best regards, Rafael Diniz Hi. You must not unconditionally remove v4l1 support. I think that configure must detect v4l1 and if it does not exist use libv4l1. There may be some older devices, that have only v4l1 drivers. We have to leave user an option to use older kernel with v4l1 support. Option to fully remove v4l1 would be nice too. Einar ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
RE: [CinCV] Cinelerra on =2.6.38 (patch removing buzz and v4l1 support)
Thanks, Rafael. Considering the successful outcome of your simpler patch (which doesn't disable v4l), I pushed an update of cinelerra in the PPA for Ubuntu Natty. I'd appreciate if any interested user could test the new binaries and let me know of any issue. Thanks again, Nicola Subject: RE: [CinCV] Cinelerra on =2.6.38 (patch removing buzz and v4l1 support) From: raf...@riseup.net To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Date: Sat, 28 May 2011 14:08:48 -0700 I tested it and cinelerra opens and seems to work as always. But I don't have a iOmega Buzz hardware to test the support for it.. Best regards, Rafael Diniz Have you tested the patch? It looks it will fail because it doesn't remove support for iOmega Buzz (that my patch did). Subject: Re: [CinCV] Cinelerra on =2.6.38 (patch removing buzz and v4l1 support) From: raf...@riseup.net To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 15:06:33 -0700 For those in ubuntu 11.04, or any newer distribution with kernel = 2.6.38, please do: # apt-get install libv4l-dev And apply the attached patch. I'm not linking cinelerra with libv4l1, so you should LD_PRELOAD it in order to use V4L in kernel = 2.6.38. If you're using an older kernel, V4L support should keep working as before. Best regards, Rafael Diniz V4L1 is the deprecated and now removed from kernel programming interface to access video/image devices. BUT the V4L1 interface can be supported via the libv4l version 0.8.3 onwards, as it that can do this conversion between the old API for the new (V4L2) API. I think that we should link cinelerra against libv4l1 if libv4l is present, otherwise, do not compile V4L support. Have you tried swaping linux/videodev.h by libv4l1-videodev.h? ; ) Best regards, Rafael Diniz By V4L do you mean the possibility to record from /dev/video_n ? In my case that would be a disaster I am using it to scan film frames from a 1394 camera. Cheers Edouard --- On Sat, 28/5/11, Simeon Völkel simeon.voel...@sfz-bw.de wrote: From: Simeon Völkel simeon.voel...@sfz-bw.de Subject: [CinCV] Cinelerra on =2.6.38 (patch removing buzz and v4l1 support) To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Date: Saturday, 28, May, 2011, 5:30 AM -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, today i updated my kernel to 2.6.39 and was able to compile cinelerra after applying Nicola's patch from bugs.cinelerra.org to j6t's repo. In my opinion we should support recent kernels rather soon. So i wonder whether we have to keep v4l1 and buzz supported or whether removing support therefore (what Nicola's patch does) is fine, too. Personally speaking i would vote for the second choice as we have extremely limited resources for maintenance. However, if (and only if) this hardware should be still in use by Cinelerra users (please speak up if that's the case for you!) we should consider adding an option to configure. Regardless wheter we want to make support optional or remove it completely, i suggest to release a new version of cinelerra (2.1.6?) supporting linux kernels =2.6.39 as soon as possible. What is you opinion on that? Regards, Simeon -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk3f378ACgkQph/voQkhF7wY2QCfbmllYDUFhhQALALNdzJJT642 2YEAoMa4VCHslFLFwMqp7aN6/WeeoqqX =4oJ+ -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
[CinCV] Patch for compilation for kernel 2.6.38+ more prominent in the download page of the website?
All, I wonder if a little guide on how to apply the patch should be listed more prominently in the download page of the cinelerra-CV website. Right now there is no guide, and the patch is buried within the bug tracker. the guide could be based on the little info in my previous email (see below). Otherwise we will get a lot of requests for help through the listserve, for something that should be more clearly explained in the download/support page. Nicola From: feran...@hotmail.com To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Subject: RE: [CinCV] vdevicebuz.C:48:28: fatal error: linux/videodev.h: No such file or directory Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 08:40:00 -0700 Are you sure you applied the patch correctly? 1. First this is the correct patch to use: http://bugs.cinelerra.org/raw-attachment/ticket/949/remove-support-v4l-buzz-3.diff 2. Download and unzip the source code you get from git. 3. Assuming the uncompressed folder cinelerra and the patch are in the same folder, you can apply the patch from this terminal: patch -p0 -i remove-support-v4l-buzz-3.diff 4. You can now proceed with compilation. P.S. if you are using ubuntu natty (11.04) (as I guess from your name) you can get precompiled binaries from: https://launchpad.net/~cinelerra-ppa/+archive/ppa To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no From: eric.ba...@ymail.com Subject: Re: [CinCV] vdevicebuz.C:48:28: fatal error: linux/videodev.h: No such file or directory Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 21:41:46 + I dropped the patch file into the cinelerra dir. What do i need to do with it now? I still get the same error while trying to compile. ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
RE: [CinCV] Patch for compilation for kernel 2.6.38+ more prominent in the download page of the website?
Thanks, Raffaella! Ciao, Nicola From: raffaella.tranie...@g-raffa.eu To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Subject: Re: [CinCV] Patch for compilation for kernel 2.6.38+ more prominent in the download page of the website? Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 17:51:14 +0200 Ciao Nicola! On 05/22/2011 05:46 PM, Nicola Ferralis wrote: I wonder if a little guide on how to apply the patch should be listed more prominently in the download page of the cinelerra-CV website. Yes, it should. I can take care of that in a couple of days. Ciao! Raffaella ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
RE: [CinCV] Newbie Questions
From: wmstr...@yahoo.com To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Subject: [CinCV] Newbie Questions Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 12:22:03 -0700 I am trying to get started (again) with Cinelerra. I am confused about several things, (even though I have tried to find the answers in the tutorials and documentation). First, the version I have installed is 1:2.1.5-0.16~ppa1~natty2 (cinelerra), the one that I think is in the repository. I guess that is version 2.1.5-0.16. Is this the proper one to use? Well, that is the most recent one in the PPA repository. CRASH I find that Cinelerra crashes fairly often. This seems to happen just after rendering is complete (not repeatable), but in other places as well. You will need to provide either a test case, a file or a detailed set of steps to reproduce. Otherwise, there is not much that can we do. Coincidentally, have you tried to compile Cinelerra from source and see if you still have these crashes? Just asking, in case there are problems with the PPA, which I maintain, or it is something intrinsic with Cinelerra.
RE: [CinCV] Newbie Questions
From: wmstr...@yahoo.com To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Subject: [CinCV] Newbie Questions Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 12:22:03 -0700 I am trying to get started (again) with Cinelerra. I am confused about several things, (even though I have tried to find the answers in the tutorials and documentation). First, the version I have installed is 1:2.1.5-0.16~ppa1~natty2 (cinelerra), the one that I think is in the repository. I guess that is version 2.1.5-0.16. Is this the proper one to use? Well, that is the most recent one in the PPA repository. CRASH I find that Cinelerra crashes fairly often. This seems to happen just after rendering is complete (not repeatable), but in other places as well. You will need to provide either a test case, a file or a detailed set of steps to reproduce. Otherwise, there is not much that can we do. Coincidentally, have you tried to compile Cinelerra from source and see if you still have these crashes? Just asking, in case there are problems with the PPA, which I maintain, or it is something intrinsic with Cinelerra.
RE: [CinCV] Cinelerra
I assume you are using cinelerra-ppa. To make sure it works, here's the steps: 1. Open Synaptic package manager 2. Select menu Settings - repositories 3. Make sure you have both the universe andmultiverse in the ubuntu software tab 4. Select the other software tab. 5. Click add and type: ppa:cinelerra-ppa/ppa 6. Close panel; from the main window, click reload. 7. Now you should be able to search for Cinelerra. This should work. From: ysuran.a...@gmail.com To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Subject: [CinCV] Cinelerra Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 21:18:35 +0100 Hi, I'm trying to install Cinelerra on Ubuntu 11.04 but it doesn't work. I've just added repository and it doesn't find any package for installing Cinelerra. How can I fix this? Regards ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
[CinCV] Cinelerra for Ubuntu 11.04 (Natty) available in Cinelerra-ppa
I just uploaded a version of Cinelerra for Ubuntu Natty (11.04) in cinelerra-ppa: https://launchpad.net/~cinelerra-ppa/+archive/ppa/+packages I am not sure how people manage to compile it with the previous patch of mine since it didn't work for me... Anyway, I used a new working patch that I just uploaded in the bug tracker: http://bugs.cinelerra.org/ticket/949#comment:6 http://bugs.cinelerra.org/raw-attachment/ticket/949/remove-support-v4l-buzz-3.diff Please let me know of any issues. Nicola
RE: [CinCV] vdevicebuz.C:48:28: fatal error: linux/videodev.h: No such file or directory
/libtiff.so -lz /usr/lib/libesd.so /usr/lib/libasound.so /usr/lib/libavc1394.so /usr/lib/librom1394.so -liec61883 /usr/lib/libraw1394.so /usr/lib/libdv.so -luuid /usr/lib/libmjpegutils.so -lm -ldl -lpthread -pthread g++: unrecognized option '-without-pic' /usr/bin/ld: filempeg.o: undefined reference to symbol 'lame_encode_buffer_float' /usr/bin/ld: note: 'lame_encode_buffer_float' is defined in DSO /usr/lib/libmp3lame.so.0 so try adding it to the linker command line /usr/lib/libmp3lame.so.0: could not read symbols: Invalid operation collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[4]: *** [cinelerra] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/cinelerra-2.1.5/cinelerra' make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/cinelerra-2.1.5/cinelerra' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/cinelerra-2.1.5' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/cinelerra-2.1.5' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 From: beccato...@hotmail.com To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Subject: Re: [CinCV] vdevicebuz.C:48:28: fatal error: linux/videodev.h: No such file or directory Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 09:42:36 + Hi guys - just to report my experience - I used the patch in the linked bug report and managed to compile Cinelerra 2.1.5 with no issues on Ubuntu 11.04, in a virtual box on Ubuntu 10.04. I haven't tried extensively editing anything with it but I got no compilation errors and it starts up fine. I know that originally Nicola Ferralis was still having some issues even with these patches applied, though I can't remember what they were precisely. But I figured it'd be useful to report that her patch is working for me. I see that Einar reported this already from the IRC log but thought it would be good to throw this email out with the rest of the details for record keeping. If anyone has any questions about anything please let me know, but I'm really not very familiar with even compiling things let alone patching (used the instructions from raffa's website to compile as I have done for the past year or so, and this is the first patch I've ever applied, actually!) so you may have to ask in small, simple word. ;) Thanks for all the work on Cinelerra, guys! Now I can consider upgrading to 11.04. :)
RE: [CinCV] vdevicebuz.C:48:28: fatal error: linux/videodev.h: No such file or directory
That only solves part of the problem. There are other compilation issues in Cinelerra... Is there anybody that was actually successful in compiling Cinelerra with a kernel = 2.6.38? Subject: Re: [CinCV] vdevicebuz.C:48:28: fatal error: linux/videodev.h: No such file or directory From: eina...@smail.ee To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Date: Sun, 1 May 2011 17:03:55 +0300 Hi. Support for v4l1 has been removed from latest kernels. Try the last patch from http://bugs.cinelerra.org/ticket/949 Einar On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Terrence Brannon scheme...@gmail.com wrote: I am running Ubuntu 11 as a 32-bit guest virtual machine of Windows 7 using VMWare workstation. Attempting to retrieve the cinelerra package failed, so I decided to compile it. Another message will detail that failure. So anyway, after downloading cinelerra via git and running: ./autogen.sh ./configure --with-buildinfo=git/recompile --enable-mmx --without-pic make I got the following error: if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../guicast -I../quicktime -I../libmpeg3 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -DHAVE_FIREWIRE -DHAVE_ESOUND -DHAVE_ALSA -DHAVE_OSS -I/usr/include/mjpegtools -I/usr/include/mjpegtools/mpeg2enc -I/usr/include/mjpegtools/mplex -pthread -I/usr/include/OpenEXR-I../quicktime/ffmpeg -DPLUGIN_DIR=\/usr/local/lib/cinelerra\ -g -O2 -MT vdevicebuz.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/vdevicebuz.Tpo -c -o vdevicebuz.o vdevicebuz.C; \ then mv -f .deps/vdevicebuz.Tpo .deps/vdevicebuz.Po; else rm -f .deps/vdevicebuz.Tpo; exit 1; fi vdevicebuz.C:48:28: fatal error: linux/videodev.h: No such file or directory compilation terminated. A bit of googling indicates that ubuntu 11 needs videodev2.h not videodev.h - http://forum.openframeworks.cc/index.php?topic=5882.0 I havent tried any alterations to the source code and wanted to wait and get advice before doing so. ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
[CinCV] RE: [CinCV] Re: [CinCV] Cinelerra på Ubuntu 10.10?
Packages for Maverick (10.10) have been made available through Launchpad for a while. https://launchpad.net/~cinelerra-ppa/+archive/ppa Sure, it's not official (neither the other suggested was anyway), but that is the only one that reliably works, at least for now. Nicola To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no CC: blackoutw...@gmail.com From: her...@skolelinux.no Subject: [CinCV] Re: [CinCV] Cinelerra på Ubuntu 10.10? Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 12:52:05 +0100 On Sat, 12 Mar 2011 13:36:17 +0100, Chris Nørve blackoutw...@gmail.com wrote: Hei. Jeg lurte på om dere kunne lage en repository eller .deb pakke fil for ubuntu 10.10? Hi. I wondered if you could make a repository or .deb package file for Ubuntu 10.10? Jeg så at det var en for 8.04 men den funket ikke for meg. I saw that there was one for 8.04 but that didn't work for me. Det er dessuten litt trøyt at dere har repos for så gamle versjoner fremfor de nye. Besides, it's quite beyond reasonable that you have repositories for so old versions, rather than the new ones. Jeg prøvde også repoen for Debian men den funka heller ikke. Please fiks dette. I also tried the repo for Debian, but that did not work either. Please fix this. We're working on it, Chris. If it's not straightened out in a week, you may nag again! :-) By the way, you wrote to a mailing list, and most of the subscribers are not Scandinavian. So please write in English. -- Herman Robak ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
RE: [CinCV] Cinelerra roadmap
Thanks, Herman. I'd like to suggest an alternative, more dynamic way of versioning Cinelerra. Instead of having patches committed in trunk and at some point (which is not described anywhere) do a 2.1.x release, what about using the Google Chrome/Chromium approach to have a fast pace versioning? Basically every time a patch is applied, there would be a version bump (maybe not immediate, but after some time of testing). This would help the user to understand what they are getting and in principle (by providing a clear way to get older versions) to fall back to previous ones. This method would also answer to my original question regarding the roadmap. Hence, this approach wouldn't need any short term roadmap, but instead new 2.1.x versions would go as stability releases. BTW, if I may, I'd like to suggest that links in the download page of the official cinelerra-CV website to the source of stable releases (2.1.5, now) to be separate from git, as it is now on the download page of Cinelerra-CV. This is *highly* confusing, since version 2.1.5 in git that I donwloaded 2 months ago is different than the same version 2.1.5 that I donwloaded today: being git, people have committed patches. So, like in most open-source projects, there should be links to stable releases (possibly using the approach above), and for the bravest, links to git (named, development branch, or nightly, whatever). Otherwise, the current situation is pretty confusing to the end user and for packagers like me. Nicola To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Subject: Re: [CinCV] Cinelerra roadmap From: her...@skolelinux.no Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 19:27:25 +0100 On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 06:03:46 +0100, Nicola Ferralis feran...@hotmail.com wrote: In the past few weeks, there has been a very interesting discussion in this forum about the long term future of Cinelerra. This discussion made me wonder if a short-term roadmap of Cinelerra really exists. In particular I wonder if there is any set decision for a version 2.1.7 (and 2.1.8, 2.2, etc)? No, I don't think there is any off-list coordinated planning going on to write a roadmap for the next release(s). Not yet, anyway. I'd like to hear some thoughts about this. As the maintainer of the Cinelerra-ppa for Ubuntu, I wonder if instead of syncing only official releases, I should instead sync with git every time a commit is pushed. In this latter case, I would think a bump in version should be adopted. Good points for the agenda of the not-yet-scheduled developer meeting. :-) It's been too long since I wrote what needs doing, without any progress report or any meetings or published TODOs. Readers are getting impatient. Not good. Why? Well, the webmistress got very busy with other film/video related stuff, and I got occupied learning Cinelerra plugin programming, and other unrelated stuff. Besides, it's winter up here. So there has been too little worth reporting, but we're not dead yet. ;-) Anyhow, I don't feel _quite_ ready to lead a long march to a Next Gen Cinelerra, yet. And I do think some firm and competent leadership would be a Good Thing. I am ready to start scrathing my own itches, and fix some other users' woes if they happen to be related to mine, as a start, using the cinelerra.org DocuWiki as a kind of blog to tell about it. It's too early to say which wishes any of the coding contributors will be able or willing to fulfill. I only promise that there will be _some_ activity within the next few days. Best wishes! -- Herman Robak ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
RE: [CinCV] Videodev.h library non longer supported on kernel 2.6.38 (Cinelerra on Ubuntu 11.04 won't compile)
Thanks, Einar. I think the more recent issues with libmp3lame are most likely related to Ubuntu 11.04, and not at all related to the lack of support of v4l1 in kernel. As I said previously, I will wait to see if 11.04 stabilises and retry the compilation process. Nicola Subject: Re: [CinCV] Videodev.h library non longer supported on kernel 2.6.38 (Cinelerra on Ubuntu 11.04 won't compile) From: eina...@smail.ee To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 20:17:19 +0200 On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Nicola Ferralis feran...@hotmail.com wrote: The same error applies to i386. For compilation, I use launchpad automatic system, which basically compiles and loads the required libraries from scratch. I never had any issue with compilation in previous version of Ubuntu. Since Natty (11.04) is still under development, I'll give it some time to stabilise and retry again. Nicola I applyed your patch and compiled Cinelerra successfully. My current system is Ubuntu 9.04. So the patch seems ok. Einar ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
RE: [CinCV] Videodev.h library non longer supported on kernel 2.6.38 (Cinelerra on Ubuntu 11.04 won't compile)
/usr/lib/libmjpegutils.so -lm -ldl -lpthread -pthread /usr/bin/ld: filempeg.o: undefined reference to symbol 'lame_encode_buffer_float' /usr/bin/ld: note: 'lame_encode_buffer_float' is defined in DSO /usr/lib64/libmp3lame.so.0 so try adding it to the linker command line /usr/lib64/libmp3lame.so.0: could not read symbols: Invalid operation collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[4]: *** [cinelerra] Error 1 Subject: Re: [CinCV] Videodev.h library non longer supported on kernel 2.6.38 (Cinelerra on Ubuntu 11.04 won't compile) From: eina...@smail.ee To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 12:16:37 +0200 Seems that v4l1 is comlpletely removed from kernel. Try to remove the rest of cinelerra that depends on it. I think it's rarely used. Einar On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 2:10 AM, Nicola Ferralis feran...@hotmail.com wrote: There seems to be another compilation problem, also due to videodev.h being no longer supported on 2.6.38. vdevice4l.h depends on it and with won't compile without it... I successfully removed iOmega Buzz support from Cinelerra (see attached patch, also in the bug report). However there seems to be another compilation problem, also due to videodev.h being no longer supported on 2.6.38. vdevice4l.h depends on it and with won't compile without it... Nicola Subject: Re: [CinCV] Videodev.h library non longer supported on kernel 2.6.38 (Cinelerra on Ubuntu 11.04 won't compile) From: eina...@smail.ee To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 18:27:37 +0200 On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 2:51 AM, Ichthyostega p...@ichthyostega.de wrote: Nicola Ferralis schrieb: vdevicebuz.C: In constructor 'VDeviceBUZInput::VDeviceBUZInput(VDeviceBUZ*)': isn't that the support for the IOmega Buzz drive, which was somewhat hacked in some time ago? I might be wrong but I somehow recall that this support already caused some problems, because it was not done in a canonical fashion, compared to other interfaces Cheers Hermann It seems to be something like this http://www.iomega.com/support/documents/80059.html http://www.trix.com/buz/faq.html#faq98 I think that support to such device can be removed. My opinion is that NLE must not support any particular capture device. There are a lot of better and maintained capture programs. Einar ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
RE: [CinCV] Videodev.h library non longer supported on kernel 2.6.38 (Cinelerra on Ubuntu 11.04 won't compile)
There seems to be another compilation problem, also due to videodev.h being no longer supported on 2.6.38. vdevice4l.h depends on it and with won't compile without it... I successfully removed iOmega Buzz support from Cinelerra (see attached patch, also in the bug report). However there seems to be another compilation problem, also due to videodev.h being no longer supported on 2.6.38. vdevice4l.h depends on it and with won't compile without it... Nicola Subject: Re: [CinCV] Videodev.h library non longer supported on kernel 2.6.38 (Cinelerra on Ubuntu 11.04 won't compile) From: eina...@smail.ee To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 18:27:37 +0200 On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 2:51 AM, Ichthyostega p...@ichthyostega.de wrote: Nicola Ferralis schrieb: vdevicebuz.C: In constructor 'VDeviceBUZInput::VDeviceBUZInput(VDeviceBUZ*)': isn't that the support for the IOmega Buzz drive, which was somewhat hacked in some time ago? I might be wrong but I somehow recall that this support already caused some problems, because it was not done in a canonical fashion, compared to other interfaces Cheers Hermann It seems to be something like this http://www.iomega.com/support/documents/80059.html http://www.trix.com/buz/faq.html#faq98 I think that support to such device can be removed. My opinion is that NLE must not support any particular capture device. There are a lot of better and maintained capture programs. Einar ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra diff -Nru cinelerra.orig//cinelerra/channelpicker.C cinelerra/cinelerra/channelpicker.C --- cinelerra.orig//cinelerra/channelpicker.C 2010-11-24 18:18:03.0 -0500 +++ cinelerra/cinelerra/channelpicker.C 2011-02-16 14:52:26.896754000 -0500 @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ #include recordgui.h #include recordmonitor.h #include theme.h -#include vdevicebuz.h +//#include vdevicebuz.h #include vdeviceprefs.h #include videodevice.h @@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ // printf(PrefsChannelPicker::PrefsChannelPicker 1\n); this-mwindow = mwindow; this-prefs = prefs; - VDeviceBUZ::get_inputs(input_sources); +// VDeviceBUZ::get_inputs(input_sources); } PrefsChannelPicker::~PrefsChannelPicker() diff -Nru cinelerra.orig//cinelerra/Makefile.am cinelerra/cinelerra/Makefile.am --- cinelerra.orig//cinelerra/Makefile.am 2010-11-24 18:18:03.0 -0500 +++ cinelerra/cinelerra/Makefile.am 2011-02-16 14:50:46.624754002 -0500 @@ -305,7 +305,6 @@ vattachmentpoint.C \ vautomation.C \ vdevicebase.C \ - vdevicebuz.C \ vdevicedvb.C \ vdeviceprefs.C \ vdevicev4l.C \ diff -Nru cinelerra.orig//cinelerra/reversemake cinelerra/cinelerra/reversemake --- cinelerra.orig//cinelerra/reversemake 2010-11-24 18:18:03.0 -0500 +++ cinelerra/cinelerra/reversemake 2011-02-16 14:50:46.632754001 -0500 @@ -35,7 +35,6 @@ make $OBJDIR/vdevicev4l.o make $OBJDIR/vdeviceprefs.o make $OBJDIR/vdevicelml.o -make $OBJDIR/vdevicebuz.o make $OBJDIR/vdevicebase.o make $OBJDIR/vdevice1394.o make $OBJDIR/vautomation.o diff -Nru cinelerra.orig//cinelerra/vdevicebuz.C cinelerra/cinelerra/vdevicebuz.C --- cinelerra.orig//cinelerra/vdevicebuz.C 2010-11-24 18:18:03.0 -0500 +++ cinelerra/cinelerra/vdevicebuz.C 1969-12-31 19:00:00.0 -0500 @@ -1,796 +0,0 @@ - -/* - * CINELERRA - * Copyright (C) 2008 Adam Williams broadcast at earthling dot net - * - * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify - * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by - * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or - * (at your option) any later version. - * - * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, - * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of - * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the - * GNU General Public License for more details. - * - * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License - * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software - * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA - * - */ - -// ALPHA C++ can't compile 64 bit headers -#undef _LARGEFILE_SOURCE -#undef _LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -#undef _FILE_OFFSET_BITS - -#include assets.h -#include bcsignals.h -#include channel.h -#include chantables.h -#include condition.h -#include file.inc -#include mutex.h -#include picture.h -#include playbackconfig.h -#include preferences.h -#include recordconfig.h -#include strategies.inc -#include vdevicebuz.h -#include vframe.h -#include videoconfig.h -#include videodevice.h - -#include errno.h -#include stdint.h -#include linux/kernel.h -//#include linux/videodev2.h -#include linux/videodev.h -#include fcntl.h -#include sys/ioctl.h -#include sys/mman.h
RE: [CinCV] Cinelerra roadmap
To add a piece of information, the bug tracker still shows open bugs marked for release for cinelerra 1.0. Does this really means that those bug were never fixed? How updated is the bug tracking system? Not to mention that spam is permeating the bug tracking system (just check the tickets submitted in the last couple of days). Nicola From: feran...@hotmail.com To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Subject: [CinCV] Cinelerra roadmap Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 21:03:46 -0800 Hi, In the past few weeks, there has been a very interesting discussion in this forum about the long term future of Cinelerra. This discussion made me wonder if a short-term roadmap of Cinelerra really exists. In particular I wonder if there is any set decision for a version 2.1.7 (and 2.1.8, 2.2, etc)? More in general, what is the main feature/timeframe/else that usually is set for a new stability release? Is the release process similar to what Google deploys for Chrome (release often minor updates)? I'd like to hear some thoughts about this. As the maintainer of the Cinelerra-ppa for Ubuntu, I wonder if instead of syncing only official releases, I should instead sync with git every time a commit is pushed. In this latter case, I would think a bump in version should be adopted. Thanks, Nicola
[CinCV] Videodev.h library non longer supported on kernel 2.6.38 (Cinelerra on Ubuntu 11.04 won't compile)
Hi, I am working on making builds available on the next version of Ubuntu (11.04 Natty). As is, cinelerra cannot compile for any architecture because of this error: vdevicebuz.C:48:28: fatal error: linux/videodev.h: No such file or directory compilation terminated. The reason for it is that linux/videodev.h has been removed from kernel 2.3.38. I am currently trying to see if compilation using the still supported linux/videodev2.h works. If it does, packages for Ubuntu will soon appear in cinelerra-ppa, otherwise cinelerra won't be available for Natty (11.04) until the issue is fixed upstream. In any case, I wanted to make sure Cinelerra developers are aware of this issue. Regards, Nicola
RE: [CinCV] Videodev.h library non longer supported on kernel 2.6.38 (Cinelerra on Ubuntu 11.04 won't compile)
Even with this change, Cinelerra won't compile. See log below. therefore, Cinelerra is broken on linux systems using kernels 2.6.38 (like Ubuntu 11.04). For what is worth, I filed a new bug: http://bugs.cinelerra.org/ticket/949 Nicola vdevicebuz.C: In constructor 'VDeviceBUZInput::VDeviceBUZInput(VDeviceBUZ*)': vdevicebuz.C:69:63: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to 'char*' vdevicebuz.C:70:56: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to 'char*' vdevicebuz.C: In member function 'virtual void VDeviceBUZInput::run()': vdevicebuz.C:118:31: error: 'BASE_VIDIOCPRIVATE' was not declared in this scope vdevicebuz.C:131:44: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to 'char*' vdevicebuz.C: In member function 'void VDeviceBUZInput::get_buffer(char**, int*)': vdevicebuz.C:159:82: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to 'char*' vdevicebuz.C:170:50: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to 'char*' vdevicebuz.C: In member function 'void VDeviceBUZInput::put_buffer()': vdevicebuz.C:184:49: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to 'char*' vdevicebuz.C: In constructor 'VDeviceBUZ::VDeviceBUZ(VideoDevice*)': vdevicebuz.C:221:49: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to 'char*' vdevicebuz.C: In member function 'virtual int VDeviceBUZ::set_channel(Channel*)': vdevicebuz.C:370:44: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to 'char*' vdevicebuz.C: In member function 'virtual int VDeviceBUZ::set_picture(PictureConfig*)': vdevicebuz.C:403:45: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to 'char*' vdevicebuz.C: In member function 'int VDeviceBUZ::get_norm(int)': vdevicebuz.C:451:30: error: 'VIDEO_MODE_NTSC' was not declared in this scope vdevicebuz.C:452:30: error: 'VIDEO_MODE_PAL' was not declared in this scope vdevicebuz.C:453:30: error: 'VIDEO_MODE_SECAM' was not declared in this scope vdevicebuz.C: In member function 'virtual int VDeviceBUZ::read_buffer(VFrame*)': vdevicebuz.C:459:44: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to 'char*' vdevicebuz.C: In member function 'int VDeviceBUZ::open_input_core(Channel*)': vdevicebuz.C:524:25: error: aggregate 'VDeviceBUZ::open_input_core(Channel*)::video_channel vch' has incomplete type and cannot be defined vdevicebuz.C:529:24: error: 'VIDIOCSCHAN' was not declared in this scope vdevicebuz.C:541:22: error: 'BASE_VIDIOCPRIVATE' was not declared in this scope vdevicebuz.C:560:22: error: 'BASE_VIDIOCPRIVATE' was not declared in this scope vdevicebuz.C:579:22: error: 'BASE_VIDIOCPRIVATE' was not declared in this scope vdevicebuz.C:593:23: error: aggregate 'VDeviceBUZ::open_input_core(Channel*)::video_picture picture_params' has incomplete type and cannot be defined vdevicebuz.C:595:22: error: 'VIDIOCGPICT' was not declared in this scope vdevicebuz.C:603:22: error: 'VIDIOCSPICT' was not declared in this scope vdevicebuz.C:605:22: error: 'VIDIOCGPICT' was not declared in this scope vdevicebuz.C:614:29: error: 'BASE_VIDIOCPRIVATE' was not declared in this scope vdevicebuz.C: In member function 'int VDeviceBUZ::open_output_core(Channel*)': vdevicebuz.C:641:24: error: aggregate 'VDeviceBUZ::open_output_core(Channel*)::video_channel vch' has incomplete type and cannot be defined vdevicebuz.C:645:23: error: 'VIDIOCSCHAN' was not declared in this scope vdevicebuz.C:651:22: error: 'BASE_VIDIOCPRIVATE' was not declared in this scope vdevicebuz.C:661:22: error: 'BASE_VIDIOCPRIVATE' was not declared in this scope vdevicebuz.C:675:22: error: 'BASE_VIDIOCPRIVATE' was not declared in this scope vdevicebuz.C: In member function 'virtual int VDeviceBUZ::write_buffer(VFrame*, EDL*)': vdevicebuz.C:686:45: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to 'char*' vdevicebuz.C:742:22: error: 'BASE_VIDIOCPRIVATE' was not declared in this scope make[4]: *** [vdevicebuz.o] Error 1 From: feran...@hotmail.com To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Subject: [CinCV] Videodev.h library non longer supported on kernel 2.6.38 (Cinelerra on Ubuntu 11.04 won't compile) Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 14:56:53 -0800 Hi, I am working on making builds available on the next version of Ubuntu (11.04 Natty). As is, cinelerra cannot compile for any architecture because of this error: vdevicebuz.C:48:28: fatal error: linux/videodev.h: No such file or directory compilation terminated. The reason for it is that linux/videodev.h has been removed from kernel 2.3.38. I am currently trying to see if compilation using the still supported linux/videodev2.h works. If it does, packages for Ubuntu will soon appear in cinelerra-ppa, otherwise cinelerra won't be available for Natty (11.04) until the issue is fixed upstream. In any case, I wanted to make sure Cinelerra developers are aware of this issue. Regards, Nicola
RE: [CinCV] can not download or get cinelerra
Gerrit, I am not sure you if you are referring to the cinelerra-ppa. If so, you should NOT install install cinelerra by download the packages from the cinelerra-ppa webpage. You instead should proceed and install the cinelerra package through synaptic (or apt-get). This way you are guaranteed to have a properly functioning cinelerra, and all future updates will be delivered automatically through your update manager. To do so 1. open synaptic package manager 2. select the menu settings-repositories 3. select the other software tab 4. push the add... button 5. type: ppa:cinelerra-ppa/ppa 6. Click add source. Reload the archives. 7. In synaptic, search for cinelerra, select for installation and install. 8. Enjoy. Please let me know if you have any other question. Regards, Nicola Subject: Re: [CinCV] can not download or get cinelerra From: ger...@gyas.nl To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 00:37:37 +0100 Hallo Haldun Thank you for the adresses. I have cinelerra downloaded now. There are another 5 packages on the repo. Which ones are necessary/recommended and which ones can I neglect? There is only one for 10,04 the ppa one. for V 2,1,5 and on megaupload 4−2 version WORK FOR 10,04 ALSO. The other 5 packages look like plugins. Maybe this explains my former question. Yet I have to find my way in Cinelerra. I want to use it for motion analysis in sports. So I want to make a 25 fps DV file to 50 fps by interpolating and deshake it with the motion track/stabilizer at highest possible quality for frame by frame analyzing the motion of the athlete. As you had some nice suggestions in the past I directed the question to you. But of course everyone's good suggestions are welcome. Have you ever seen Gamebreaker on Apple? It is an application of some 2000 euro's. I believe Cinelerra can do something like that too. Best regards, Gerrit
[CinCV] Cinelerra roadmap
Hi, In the past few weeks, there has been a very interesting discussion in this forum about the long term future of Cinelerra. This discussion made me wonder if a short-term roadmap of Cinelerra really exists. In particular I wonder if there is any set decision for a version 2.1.7 (and 2.1.8, 2.2, etc)? More in general, what is the main feature/timeframe/else that usually is set for a new stability release? Is the release process similar to what Google deploys for Chrome (release often minor updates)? I'd like to hear some thoughts about this. As the maintainer of the Cinelerra-ppa for Ubuntu, I wonder if instead of syncing only official releases, I should instead sync with git every time a commit is pushed. In this latter case, I would think a bump in version should be adopted. Thanks, Nicola
RE: [CinCV] hardware
Well, I am glad it works for you. My point was simply that since Cinelerra uses its own libraries, it doesn't matter what's available on the actual distro, cinelerra should perform just as well. In other words, I wouldn't recommend an upgrade *just* for cinelerra, mostly if the user (like many) is happy with hardy. In any case, the ppa provides (and will continue to provide) builds for all releases currently supported ;-) It's all about choice. Ciao, Nicola From: raffaella.tranie...@g-raffa.eu To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Subject: Re: [CinCV] hardware Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 23:51:57 +0100 Hi Nicola! Why not using Hardy? It's a LTS release and it is very stable, and it is not prehistoric. My opinion is based on my experience. I do workshops on creative works with Free Software and I tested different labs with different Ubuntus. In the past two years video editing (and graphics) applications had such a fast development that Hardy is indeed already too old (e.g. you can't have the latest Kdenlive). I kept having so many issues (e.g. freezing interfaces, blank screens, old or missing applications...) that I promised myself not to work or teach on Hardy anymore. Note also that Hardy will be supported just for the next 3 months and the new LTS release is just a mouse click away. That's why I don't recommend Hardy to people looking for a good distro for video-editing. Ciao! Raffaella ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
RE: [CinCV] cinelerra in spanish
Your English is just fine!!! Let me review what I did. My initial installation (Ubuntu 10.10) was with en_US locale. I added Spanish as an additional language (from System - Administration - Language Support). I applied it system-wise. Also, I made sure my Language for menus and windows had Spanish as the first Entry. After a quick reboot, My system was running in Spanish. I reinstalled cinelerra, and it was translated in Spanish. Running locale -a, shows en_US and es_ES with UTF-8. Reverting the language to English (in the Language for menus and windows), brought back English as the default language for Cinelerra). One question: after you switched to UTF-8, did you use the stable version of cinelerra-ppa (2.1.6-0.14) or the unstable one (2.1.6-0.14.2)? I'd recommend using the stable version. I hope it helps. Nicola Subject: Re: [CinCV] cinelerra in spanish From: yosep...@gmail.com To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 22:32:15 +0100 I have installed UTF-8, no ISO, and the cinelerra does not translate. My english is very bad, You might not understand. 2011/1/16 Nicola Ferralis feran...@hotmail.com I installed the es_ES locales for testing on my machine. Unfortunately, I don't have ISO, but Unicode UTF-8. When switching between en and es, translation works just fine (using stable cinelerra ppa). I'd recommend trying to use Unicode UTF-8, rather than ISO. From: feran...@hotmail.com To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Subject: RE: [CinCV] cinelerra in spanish Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 17:12:52 -0800 Yosepkey, Thanks for the suggestion. I just prepared an experimental build following your suggestion. It's not in the main ppa, but in a new experimental one designed only for testing: https://launchpad.net/~cinelerra-ppa/+archive/cinelerra-exp Would you please this version (once it's built), and let me know how it goes? If all is well I'll push the update in the stable ppa. Thanks! Nicola From: yosep...@gmail.com To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Subject: [CinCV] cinelerra in spanish Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 22:10:17 +0100 I've seen the last update: 2.1.5-0.14, add ISO-8859-15, very good news. But in spanish is ISO-8859-1. Can you put ISO-8859-1 too? Thanks, Yosepkey
RE: [CinCV] cinelerra startup error in Ubuntu 10.10 64bit
There seems to be a conflict with another repository. Do you have any other repos activated that provide cinelerra-cv? I'd recommend you first disable it, uninstall the current version, and use the ppa. Please let me know if that works for you. Nicola From: al...@wanadoo.fr To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Subject: Re: [CinCV] cinelerra startup error in Ubuntu 10.10 64bit Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 10:34:03 +0100 Hello Nicola, I tried to install cinelerra 2.1.5 from your ppa but I have several errors occured and installation didn't work. Hereby the errors in French. I can translate if you need. Thank you if you can help me. I was a little lazy to use grandma's way but anyhow here you are :-( May be I have to move the ancient version first ? they can't be together ... Errors seems to tell that. E: /var/cache/apt/archives/libguicast1_1%3a2.1.5-0.14~ppa1~lucid1_i386.deb: tentative de remplacement de « /usr/lib/libguicast.so.1.0.0 », qui appartient aussi au paquet libcinelerra 0 E: /var/cache/apt/archives/libmpeg3cine_1%3a2.1.5-0.14~ppa1~lucid1_i386.deb: tentative de remplacement de « /usr/lib/libavcodec-cinelerra.so.51.57.0 », qui appartient aussi au paquet libcinelerra 0 E: /var/cache/apt/archives/libquicktimecine_1%3a2.1.5-0.14~ppa1~lucid1_i386.deb: tentative de remplacement de « /usr/lib/libquicktimehv-1.6.0.so.1.0.0 », qui appartient aussi au paquet libcinelerra 0 E: /var/cache/apt/archives/cinelerra_1%3a2.1.5-0.14~ppa1~lucid1_i386.deb: tentative de remplacement de « /usr/bin/mplexlo », qui appartient aussi au paquet cinelerra-optional 0 Sélection du paquet libguicast1 précédemment désélectionné. (Lecture de la base de données... 328697 fichiers et répertoires déjà installés.) Dépaquetage de libguicast1 (à partir de .../libguicast1_1%3a2.1.5-0.14~ppa1~lucid1_i386.deb) ... dpkg : erreur de traitement de /var/cache/apt/archives/libguicast1_1%3a2.1.5-0.14~ppa1~lucid1_i386.deb (--unpack) : tentative de remplacement de « /usr/lib/libguicast.so.1.0.0 », qui appartient aussi au paquet libcinelerra 0:2.1.1-git20100325~ppa5~lucid dpkg-deb: sous-processus coller tué par le signal (Relais brisé (pipe)) Sélection du paquet libmpeg3cine précédemment désélectionné. Dépaquetage de libmpeg3cine (à partir de .../libmpeg3cine_1%3a2.1.5-0.14~ppa1~lucid1_i386.deb) ... dpkg : erreur de traitement de /var/cache/apt/archives/libmpeg3cine_1%3a2.1.5-0.14~ppa1~lucid1_i386.deb (--unpack) : tentative de remplacement de « /usr/lib/libavcodec-cinelerra.so.51.57.0 », qui appartient aussi au paquet libcinelerra 0:2.1.1-git20100325~ppa5~lucid dpkg-deb: sous-processus coller tué par le signal (Relais brisé (pipe)) Sélection du paquet libquicktimecine précédemment désélectionné. Dépaquetage de libquicktimecine (à partir de .../libquicktimecine_1%3a2.1.5-0.14~ppa1~lucid1_i386.deb) ... dpkg : erreur de traitement de /var/cache/apt/archives/libquicktimecine_1%3a2.1.5-0.14~ppa1~lucid1_i386.deb (--unpack) : tentative de remplacement de « /usr/lib/libquicktimehv-1.6.0.so.1.0.0 », qui appartient aussi au paquet libcinelerra 0:2.1.1-git20100325~ppa5~lucid dpkg-deb: sous-processus coller tué par le signal (Relais brisé (pipe)) Préparation du remplacement de cinelerra 2.1.1-git20100325~ppa5~lucid (en utilisant .../cinelerra_1%3a2.1.5-0.14~ppa1~lucid1_i386.deb) ... Dépaquetage de la mise à jour de cinelerra ... dpkg : erreur de traitement de /var/cache/apt/archives/cinelerra_1%3a2.1.5-0.14~ppa1~lucid1_i386.deb (--unpack) : tentative de remplacement de « /usr/bin/mplexlo », qui appartient aussi au paquet cinelerra-optional 0:2.1.1-git20100325~ppa5~lucid Pas de rapport Apport écrit car le nombre de rapport maximum (MaxReports) est atteint dpkg-deb: sous-processus coller tué par le signal (Relais brisé (pipe)) Traitement des actions différées (« triggers ») pour « python-gmenu »... Rebuilding /usr/share/applications/desktop.fr_FR.utf8.cache... Traitement des actions différées (« triggers ») pour « python-support »... Des erreurs ont été rencontrées pendant l'exécution : /var/cache/apt/archives/libguicast1_1%3a2.1.5-0.14~ppa1~lucid1_i386.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/libmpeg3cine_1%3a2.1.5-0.14~ppa1~lucid1_i386.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/libquicktimecine_1%3a2.1.5-0.14~ppa1~lucid1_i386.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/cinelerra_1%3a2.1.5-0.14~ppa1~lucid1_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) Échec de l'installation d'un paquet. Tentative de récupération : Le 04/01/2011 04:23, Nicola Ferralis a écrit : As I said in my previous note, I updated the Ubuntu
RE: [CinCV] cinelerra startup error in Ubuntu 10.10 64bit
I just pushed an updated package in the cinelerra-ppa repository, with the shmmax init script. So everything should be fixed now. Please test. Nicola From: p...@ichthyostega.de To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Subject: Re: [CinCV] cinelerra startup error in Ubuntu 10.10 64bit Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 06:42:11 +0100 Paul Chang schrieb: Installed cinelerra in Ubuntu 10.10 64bit. Every time, when I tried to start cinelerra, I got an error message as shown in the attached screen shot. Any fix suggestion and work-around is highly appreciated! Hi Paul Chang, the most simple fix is right below your nose: do as Cinelerra tells you! | Before running Cinelerra, do the following as root | | echo 0x7fff /proc/sys/kernel/shmmax This command tells your OS kernel to allow individual programs to use more shared memory, which is what Cinelerra needs. Because such a setting could be used for a denial-of-service-attack, only the root user is allowed to do such a setting. Thus, at a console, you call sudo -i to get a root console and there you can issue this command. Which creates kind of a twist. Not every user is capable of running this command. Moreover it gets annoying if you have to do it every time you boot your computer again. Thus, from here on there are several options to make your life better and let Cinelerra complain less... - put it somewhere into the system configuration, so this command is executed at boot automatically - write a wrapper script to start Cinelerra - some pre compiled packages even install such an wrapper script automatically (if I recall correct, the Akirad packages do this). Now it's a bit difficult to help you further without knowing your skill level. How familiar are you with unix like operating systems? Do you know how to write a little shell script? Do you know how to handle the Unix permissions? Maybe someone else on the list can give more informations about a precompiled packages (I compiled Cinelerra myself, thus I can't say much about that topic) Greetings, Hermann V. ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
RE: [CinCV] Problems compiling the new CinelerraCV 2.1.5
The package in the ppa is compiled with conditions that are very similar to those indicated in the howto. I wouldn't expect any differences in the final behaviour. As indicated, try and recompile from source... Ciao from California, Nicola From: raffaella.tranie...@livecom.it To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Subject: Re: [CinCV] Problems compiling the new CinelerraCV 2.1.5 Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 18:28:41 +0100 On 05/12/10 15:52, Wolfgang Brunner wrote: The version from the repository, I had already installed. the responsiveness of my mouse is delayed. in menus so I wanted to compile cine. I'm not sure it's the package to blame. I've seen a Cinelerra misbehaving on menus after an internal upgrade from Lucid to Maverick (misplaced reaction of GUI). Compiling it from scratches didn't solve the problem. Ciao Raffaella ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
RE: [CinCV] Problems compiling the new CinelerraCV 2.1.5
And when you got environment/libraries ok, you can also compile Cinelerra 4.2. as...@ubuntu:~/Bin/cinelerra-4.2/bin$ ./cinelerra Cinelerra 4.2 (C)2010 Adam Williams Are you sure about that? I have been having problems compiling Cinelerra 4.2 from source. The problem is in the libfaad library: In file included from /usr/include/math.h:95, from common.h:348, from bits.c:29: /usr/include/bits/mathcalls.h:326: error: conflicting types for 'lrintf' common.h:313: note: previous definition of 'lrintf' was here Apparently it's a known issue also for Fedora users: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=2944664group_id=13554atid=113554 Cheers, Nicola
RE: [CinCV] New PPA for Ubuntu - Cinelerra 2.1.5CV
No problem. I'd like to ask to give these builds a round of testing with different hardware (specifically RT kernels in Ubuntu studio). I don't have a way to test them myself, so any help is appreciated. Furthermore, this is not intended as a personal project, but a cooperation/collaboration. So anyone willing to help maintaining and improving the packages is welcome to join the cinelerra-ppa team: https://launchpad.net/~cinelerra-ppa/+contactuser Alas, feel free to drop an email to report issues. Thanks, Nicola From: raffaella.tranie...@livecom.it To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Subject: Re: [CinCV] New PPA for Ubuntu - Cinelerra 2.1.5CV Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 10:11:17 +0100 On 04/12/10 01:00, Nicola Ferralis wrote: I created a new personal package archive (PPA) The packaged version of cinelerra is 2.1.5CV. That's great news!! I updated the website accordingly. http://cinelerra.org/getting_cinelerra.php#ubuntu Thank you very much! Ciao Raffaella ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
RE: [CinCV] Problems compiling the new CinelerraCV 2.1.5
mmmh weird. I did exactly the same. However I am using maverick i386... Nicola From: asmo.koski...@arkki.info To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Subject: Re: [CinCV] Problems compiling the new CinelerraCV 2.1.5 Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 23:20:03 +0200 05.12.2010 22:33, Nicola Ferralis kirjoitti: Are you sure about that? I have been having problems compiling Cinelerra 4.2 from source. I removed cinelerra-4.2 directory and downloaded source again. This is Maverick x84_64. I just use 'configure' with no options. as...@ubuntu:~/Bin$ bunzip2 cinelerra-4.2-src.tar.bz2 as...@ubuntu:~/Bin$ tar xvf cinelerra-4.2-src.tar cinelerra-4.2/ cinelerra-4.2/README [--] cinelerra-4.2/plugin_config as...@ubuntu:~/Bin$ cd cinelerra-4.2/ as...@ubuntu:~/Bin/cinelerra-4.2$ ./configure CONFIGURING QUICKTIME CONFIGURING FAAD checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c [--] Have Video4Linux 2 Have DVB Have OpenGL 2.0 Configured successfully. Type 'make' to build me. as...@ubuntu:~/Bin/cinelerra-4.2$ as...@ubuntu:~/Bin/cinelerra-4.2$ make make -f build/Makefile.cinelerra make[1]: Siirrytään hakemistoon /home/asmok/Bin/cinelerra-4.2 [--] make[1]: Poistutaan hakemistosta /home/asmok/Bin/cinelerra-4.2 as...@ubuntu:~/Bin/cinelerra-4.2$ as...@ubuntu:~/Bin/cinelerra-4.2$ cd bin as...@ubuntu:~/Bin/cinelerra-4.2/bin$ ./cinelerra Cinelerra 4.2 (C)2010 Adam Williams Best Regards Asmo Koskinen. ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
RE: [CinCV] Testing Nicola's PPA in Ubuntu Studio
Thanks, Asmo! Best, Nicola From: asmo.koski...@arkki.info To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Subject: [CinCV] Testing Nicola's PPA in Ubuntu Studio Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 01:39:28 +0200 Ubuntu Studio x86_64 10.04.1 - dual screen, realtime kernel. I do not see any problems to use Nicola PPA. I do use this script (needs ffmpeg from source) to make my camcorders MTS files suitable for Cinelerra - Cinelerra eats MOV files. http://code.google.com/p/hdffxvrt/ http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=4907079postcount=1 I rendered short MOV clip to OGG/THEORA, no problems. stu...@ubuntu-studio:~$ uname -a Linux ubuntu-studio 2.6.33-29-realtime #1-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT RT Wed Aug 4 17:22:37 UTC 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux stu...@ubuntu-studio:~$ cinelerra Cinelerra 2.1.5CV (C) 2010 Heroine Virtual Ltd. Compiled on Mon Nov 29 02:05:51 UTC 2010 stu...@ubuntu-studio:~$ lspci -k 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation G96 [GeForce 9500 GT] (rev a1) Kernel driver in use: nvidia Kernel modules: nvidia-current, nvidiafb So far so good. Best Regards Asmo Koskinen. ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
RE: [CinCV] Problems compiling the new CinelerraCV 2.1.5
It turns out that I get the compiling error with i386 machines, while I have no issues with amd64 Nicola From: asmo.koski...@arkki.info To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Subject: Re: [CinCV] Problems compiling the new CinelerraCV 2.1.5 Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 00:03:05 +0200 05.12.2010 22:33, Nicola Ferralis kirjoitti: And when you got environment/libraries ok, you can also compile Cinelerra 4.2. as...@ubuntu:~/Bin/cinelerra-4.2/bin$ ./cinelerra Cinelerra 4.2 (C)2010 Adam Williams Are you sure about that? I compiled cinelerra-cv again. Here is output of './configure --with-buildinfo=git/recompile' (end of): Summary of mandatory components: libogg found libvorbis found libvorbisencfound libvorbisfile found libtheora found OpenEXR found libdv found libpng found libjpeg libraries found libjpeg headers found libtiff libraries found libtiff headers found FreeType 2 found libx264 libraries found libx264 headers found libuuid libraries found libuuid headers found mjpegtools found libfftw3 libraries found libfftw3 headersfound liba52 librariesfound liba52 headers found libmp3lame librariesfound libmp3lame headers found libsndfile librariesfound libsndfile headers found libfaac libraries found libfaac headers found libfaad libraries found libfaad headers found Summary of optional components: ESD subsystem found ESD (Enlightenment Sound Daemon) is enabled ALSA subsystem found ALSA is enabled libraw1394 found libiec61883 found libavc1394 librariesfound libavc1394 headers found librom1394 librariesfound librom1394 headers found Firewire is enabled OpenGL 2.0 librariesmissing Hardware acceleration using OpenGL 2.0 is disabled Now type make to start compilation. as...@ubuntu:~/Bin/cinelerra-cv$ as...@ubuntu:~/Bin/cinelerra-cv$ /usr/local/bin/cinelerra Cinelerra 2.1.5CV GIT::8f8268e619b6880afb3bc8e53b5e797a34c72180 (C) 2010 Heroine Virtual Ltd. Internal ffmpeg Compiled on su 5.12.2010 23.54.06 +0200 Best Regards Asmo Koskinen. ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
[CinCV] New PPA for Ubuntu - Cinelerra 2.1.5CV
I created a new personal package archive (PPA) for Ubuntu Maverick and below. I significantly upgraded the debian folder to allow builds for recent version of Ubuntu. The packaged version of cinelerra is 2.1.5CV. https://launchpad.net/~cinelerra-ppa
RE: [CinCV] Cinelerra
If you use this ppa you can easily remove it if you don't like it... ;-) https://launchpad.net/~cinelerra-ppa/+archive/ppa From: myskillzo...@gmail.com To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Subject: [CinCV] Cinelerra Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 18:35:16 -0500 Does Cinelerra run on Ubuntu 10.10? I don't want to screw up my OS by reinstalling this. Thanks ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
