Using DDR callback [7:15813]
Has anyone had success implementing DDR callback using dialer profile? It worked well with legacy DDR, but not with dialer profile. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=15813t=15813 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Thanks! [7:15769]
The Cisco Press Support Exam Certification Guide was excellent as are the Boson tests Good luck. OSN Ole Drews Jensen wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Once again thanks to the members of this list who have directly and indirectly helped me. I just passed the BSCN this morning with an okay score, and I will now open my CIT book and see what kind of horrors pops out of the first chapter. Have a great weekend, Ole Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.RouterChief.com NEED A JOB ??? http://www.oledrews.com/job Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=15814t=15769 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Bad experiences with IQSale aka Grandstore .. [7:15756]
Not sure but when i traded with IQSale everything went smooth. I was impressed and i am overseas here in Australia and everything arrived within a week. -Original Message- From: Jason [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 13 August 2001 3:59 am To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bad experiences with IQSale aka Grandstore .. [7:15756] Anyway, if anybody has any experiences with this company IQSale , Grandstore , etc to contribute, please email me at [EMAIL PROTECTED], I will try to forward it to the necessary agencies Jason Jason wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Thanks. I'm considering that as well based on various advises from others... I'm still looking for feedbacks from those who had bad experiences with them especially on eBay's auction Their tactic seems to be 1. Delay shipment. - Took them 1 week to response with Please provide this information. when I sent them the info in the first email. Then next strategy is my Boss is on vacation in x for two weeks... I cannot get hold of the shipping information. 2. Faulty or wrong items. - This appear to be especially so for those who got a good price on the item on eBay... seems like a way for them to get out of the legally binding deal 3. RMA - a. Ship a different eqpt to the buyer or with missing parts. b. Cliams no other similar item, offer to refund minus shipping and most people tends to agree after such long delays. 4. Delay refund , ask for same information provided on (1). 5. Ignored your mails... I thought I was the only one but it seems like it's happening to everybody that got back to me Jon Krabbenschmidt wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I would also contact the District Attorney's Office in the area that they operate. If you have never contacted a DA's office you may be surprised at how responsive and aggressive they are. Jon -Original Message- From: Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2001 8:13 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Bad experiences with IQSale aka Grandstore . [7:15756] After talking to a couple of other people, I've found that I'm not the only one having problem getting refund from IQSale aka Grandstore , with a couple of other names For myself, I was promised a refund way back in late May and after numerous emails, on 4th July, promised to get back to me with details on the refund and till today is waiting for the cheque. My emails to them after 4th July was ignored. I'm planning to set up a web pages with testimonies about the problems we have with this company and also, if it has since been resolved, how long it took and the steps he or she has to take before the company would resolve the issue or refund I have filed a complaint with BBB and is considering filing a complaint with USPS for mail fraud as well. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=15815t=15756 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: One interface-two IPs- NAT? [7:15460]
I'll try again. I'm not saying you're wrong about the scenario as you
describe it, only that you are making many assumptions here that I'm not yet
willing to read into things. MY REPLIES ARE BELOW:
Respectfully, your incorrect. He has a legal class C, 128.5.1.X, which the
OP stated in his original email.
He stated no such thing. He just used that number as a for instance in
his example. If he has all or any significant part of an entire class C, I
would be very surprised based on the relatively small scope of his question
and the equipment we're talking about. If we want to make assumptions based
on his original post, probably those 128-address or real addresses are a
/30 on the wan side of the isp router as well as a slightly larger subnet
for his LAN machines, But we *don't know*.
His problem is that he is using 10 net addressing internally and for
whatever reason doesn't want to deal with the ISP changing their router.
He can't be using ten-dot addressing currently because that would mean
that the isp's router is already doing some kind of translation (what I
believe is easy to miss here is that most of the time, the isp router is on
premises and is THE router for the customer LAN)
If one were to implement a NAT pool composed of addresses on the 128.5.1.x
subnet, or just use the routers' own IP address with PAT/NAT overload, this
could be done easily. The ISP router will simply arp for the 128.5.1.x
addresses and send the packets to the customer controlled router. The
customer controlled router performs the de-NAT operation and all is well.
There's no reason to require any changes to the ISP router assuming it is
currently working and connected to the 128.5.1.x subnet. This is a very
common scenario, the ISP router doesn't need to know about the internal
subnets.
That's certainly the common scenario when the customer uses their own
router exclusively on premises. I really don't believe that's the case here.
I think we're talking about a couple of 160Xs trying to co-exist on an
ehternet, one doing the nat for the other. And I'm *pretty sure* that
doesn't work.
The only special requirement about the OP scenario is that he has a router
with only a single ethernet interface. Given that, his request was simplyhow
to implement NAT with only a single physical interface. ..The router
lets you configure a sub-interface, but not apply an IP address and NAT, it
complains about not having ISL or 802.1q configured. (IOS version 12.0.9)
Yup. I appreciate the explanation.
So the bottom line is that it doesn't appear he will be able to implement
his scenario with the 1601, but only because the 1600 series doesn't support
802.1q. In order to have his scenario work he'll need some additional
hardware. My suggestion would be to get a cheap x86 box and implement Linux.
Total cost about $150.
No argument from me, although the isp has no reason not to implement PAT
on their router. It's almost certainly their own allocated IP addresses that
they'd be saving.
Thanks again for the discussion. It's nice to know that with different
routers the scenario could work
:-{)]
Mark A. Morenz, MS Ed, CCNA, CCAI
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=15816t=15460
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BGP question (2) [7:15796]
I'm not sure I understand the question entirely. When you say A can't ping
D's loopback, have you tried an extended ping?
:-{)]
-Mark A. Morenz, MS Ed, CCNA, CCAI
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=15817t=15796
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PIX515UR Question!!! [7:15806]
Yes, you may configure the primary as a stand-alone and use it that way until you are ready to install the failover appliance. I have done this a couple of times. I have had a couple of installs where we had to use the failover as a single primary for a short time. THT, MikeN Magdy H. Ibrahim wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Dear All, I am going to configure PIX515UR bundle for failover. OK? For some reasons, I am thinking in the following: Is it possible to configure the primary unit only to work in my system for few days before the final conf. as a failover??? I mean If I configured the primary unit and put in in my real system, it will work? or I have to configure the whole two unit for failover only??? Please advice me Magdy Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=15819t=15806 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Stopping console messages [7:15789]
no logging console
:-{)]
Mark A. Morenz, MS ED, CCNA, CCAI
p.s. you can also control what level of debug messages you receive, but to
just get rid of them, use the above command.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=15818t=15789
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Stopping console messages [7:15787]
From global configuration: no logging console HTH, MikeN ahmadbilal wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi all, I get lot of console messages when i connect to router cause of link up/down ,due to this i have to wait a long time to trouble shoot and even console stops responding ,how do i stop em. Any body know a good and tutorial type information /site on Vlans?How to connect layer 2 and layer 3 switches in a Vlan envoirnment? Looking forward for a reply. Regards Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=15820t=15787 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
test [7:15821]
sorry Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=15821t=15821 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Friday Follies - IP NAT behaviour [7:15822]
so I'm late. so sue me ;- last Friday while I was in the office I got to chatting with one of the other SE's. He had a problem with his home setup and wanted some help. It was an interesting enough problem that I thought some of you CCNA's, some of your CCNP candidates, might enjoy taking a crack at it. this person has a DSL connection to the internet. He has an single assigned IP address. He is using a Cisco router as his firewall, in this fashion: internet---DSL_router--Cisco_router--web_server E0 E1 life is good. then he starts to fool around with NAT. He puts a private IP on his web server, and he runs NAT on the Cisco router. Again, life is good. folks can reach his web server from the net. but now he wants to telnet from the net ( i.e. from work ) into the Cisco router.. He cannot do so. instead he hits his web server, where telnet is not running as a service. so he disables NAT. he configures policy routing, and places the policy statement on the correct interface. tries to telnet into the cisco router. He can do so. however, now he cannot reach the web server from the net. if he enables the http server on the Cisco router, he gets the Cisco router login screen from his browser. now the question is, why? that is, what is the reason that the two situations occur? with NAT enabled, he cannot telnet to the router. with NAT disabled, he cannot browse the web server, even with policy routing in place. you may assume that all configurations are correct, both for NAT and for policy routing. At least that's what the two CCIE's who joined the discussion told us ;- answers late Monday. Chuck Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=15822t=15822 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Friday Follies - IP NAT behaviour [7:15822]
why he gets to the server when telnetting to the router, perhaps the router is forwarding more ports than just 80, perhaps 23, perhaps more.. Bri - Original Message - From: Chuck Larrieu To: Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2001 9:06 PM Subject: Friday Follies - IP NAT behaviour [7:15822] so I'm late. so sue me ;- last Friday while I was in the office I got to chatting with one of the other SE's. He had a problem with his home setup and wanted some help. It was an interesting enough problem that I thought some of you CCNA's, some of your CCNP candidates, might enjoy taking a crack at it. this person has a DSL connection to the internet. He has an single assigned IP address. He is using a Cisco router as his firewall, in this fashion: internet---DSL_router--Cisco_router--web_server E0 E1 life is good. then he starts to fool around with NAT. He puts a private IP on his web server, and he runs NAT on the Cisco router. Again, life is good. folks can reach his web server from the net. but now he wants to telnet from the net ( i.e. from work ) into the Cisco router.. He cannot do so. instead he hits his web server, where telnet is not running as a service. so he disables NAT. he configures policy routing, and places the policy statement on the correct interface. tries to telnet into the cisco router. He can do so. however, now he cannot reach the web server from the net. if he enables the http server on the Cisco router, he gets the Cisco router login screen from his browser. now the question is, why? that is, what is the reason that the two situations occur? with NAT enabled, he cannot telnet to the router. with NAT disabled, he cannot browse the web server, even with policy routing in place. you may assume that all configurations are correct, both for NAT and for policy routing. At least that's what the two CCIE's who joined the discussion told us ;- answers late Monday. Chuck Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=15827t=15822 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ports bouncing on a switch - [7:15532]
Keep in mind that PAgP (Port Aggregation Protocol) is the protocol that sets up and tears down EtherChannels. Unless the port is configured to shut off PAgP then you'll still get activity for it since the default setting is auto. Even on a port that ISN'T configured for EtherChannel. You might also want to make note that PAgP will add ~18 seconds to your STP convergence since the PAgP negotiations must be complete before STP convergence begins. You might want to disable PAgP on all user ports if only to make the initial connect time a bit snappier. Hope this helps, Karen *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 8/9/2001 at 5:10 PM Quadri, Habeeb wrote: Hi all, I would like to know what causes the switch ports to generate PAGP-5:joined/left bridge message. Is it a physical level DTR type of signal that detects loss of signal or could it be something in data link layer like STP. TIA Habeeb Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=15826t=15532 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One more question on OSPF packet behaviour [7:15824]
continuing my inquiries into how this stuff really works operationally. here's what I think: an OSPF packet is created, using an IP header. Protocol 89 is indicated in the protocol field. the source address is the interface out which the packet is sent. the destination address is 224.0.0.5 or 224.0.0.6 depending. I suspect that the time to live is set to one (1), this so that the packets don't rattle around forever. however, in the case of a virtual link, where the V bit is set in the LSA, while all other things in the IP header remain the same, I suspect that the time to live is set to a higher value - maybe even to 255. after all, one can't be sure how many hops across the transit area until one reaches the router with the indicated RID. anyone ever sniffed this, and know for sure? I'd like to verify that my idle speculation approaches the truth. Chuck Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=15824t=15824 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Friday Follies - IP NAT behaviour [7:15822]
I'll take a stab. Going from inside to outside, Nat takes happens before policy routing. From outside to inside, just the oposite takes place. Without looking at the configs, This is the best I can come up with. Good brain teaser though Tony M. #6172 - Original Message - From: Chuck Larrieu To: Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2001 9:06 PM Subject: Friday Follies - IP NAT behaviour [7:15822] so I'm late. so sue me ;- last Friday while I was in the office I got to chatting with one of the other SE's. He had a problem with his home setup and wanted some help. It was an interesting enough problem that I thought some of you CCNA's, some of your CCNP candidates, might enjoy taking a crack at it. this person has a DSL connection to the internet. He has an single assigned IP address. He is using a Cisco router as his firewall, in this fashion: internet---DSL_router--Cisco_router--web_server E0 E1 life is good. then he starts to fool around with NAT. He puts a private IP on his web server, and he runs NAT on the Cisco router. Again, life is good. folks can reach his web server from the net. but now he wants to telnet from the net ( i.e. from work ) into the Cisco router.. He cannot do so. instead he hits his web server, where telnet is not running as a service. so he disables NAT. he configures policy routing, and places the policy statement on the correct interface. tries to telnet into the cisco router. He can do so. however, now he cannot reach the web server from the net. if he enables the http server on the Cisco router, he gets the Cisco router login screen from his browser. now the question is, why? that is, what is the reason that the two situations occur? with NAT enabled, he cannot telnet to the router. with NAT disabled, he cannot browse the web server, even with policy routing in place. you may assume that all configurations are correct, both for NAT and for policy routing. At least that's what the two CCIE's who joined the discussion told us ;- answers late Monday. Chuck Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=15823t=15822 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VLAN interface remains SHUTDOWN ! ! ! ! ! ! ! [7:15742]
Hamid, On a switch, the only interface that requires an IP address is the management interface. The management interface is a virtual interface that isn't attached to a physical port and is of use only for management - hence the name. It handles such management protocols as telnet, TFTP, and SNMP. Since the switch can only handle one management interface at a time, then the current interface (VLAN 1 is the default) will remain active until it is shutdown. At that point you will be able to bring up your new management interface. The ports that are configured for VLAN 2 will function as part of VLAN 2 regardless of what the management interface is set to. HTH, Karen *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 8/11/2001 at 8:38 AM Hamid wrote: Hi group, I have a CATALYST 2900XL switch. All the settings sre set to defualt except the hostname, IP address, I have configured some ports to be on VLAN 2. But the problem is that VLAN 2 remains shutdown In the configuration: show int vlan 2 VLAN2 is administratively down, line protocol is down Hardware is CPU Interface, address is 0004.9a99.9d80 (bia 0004.9a99.9d80) Internet address is 192.168.1.254/24 MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1 Kbit, DLY 1000 usec, reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255 Encapsulation ARPA ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00 ! interface FastEthernet0/9 switchport multi vlan 1,2 switchport mode multi ! interface FastEthernet0/10 switchport access vlan 2 ! interface VLAN1 ip address 192.168.0.254 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast no ip route-cache ! interface VLAN2 ip address 192.168.1.254 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast no ip route-cache shutdown Can anyone tell me what the problem is? Thanx in advance Hamid Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=15828t=15742 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IT Companies Going Broke [7:15829]
Hi all. You may have noticed me on the air every now and then, before from GoWireless and now from Touchmark. Well it seems that every company I work for go's broke. GoWireless did, now touchmark have gone brokeWhen will it end for all of us. Advice for you youngsters, work where you are happy. Where you feel it is the right environment. A place that you think will be open in a years time... I appreciate every ones comments over the past 6 months and I hope to be back on the air soon, working for a bank or something See ya team John Sydney Australia Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=15829t=15829 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Access Lists On Routers [7:15830]
I am a network engineer and have been assigned a task of implementing access lists on our routers. I have decided on implementing extended access lists permitting specific ports and restricting the other unwanted ports,but I am not sure as to where I should apply the access lists ,on the ethernet or serial interfaces ,and whether inbound or outbound access lists should be applied. Can somebody help me . Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=15830t=15830 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
