Help reqd on Inter Vlan IPX/SAP traffic forwarding [7:45581]
Dear Group I am configuring the IPX/SAP traffic forwarding between Vlan's on a catalyst 6006 with MSFC. The scenario is like this :- cat6506(CORE)-cat4003(DISTRIBUTION)-cat2924(Access)clients 1) Vlan no. 15 Server Vlan All my servers are connected to this Vlan. I have a Nolell 5.0 server also placed in this Vlan. 2)Vlan No 11 Client Vlan All my users are connected to this Vlan. There are some machines which requires to remote boot (Novell server). I have 2 combination of NIC's. Number 1 is 802.3 frame type supported 2nd is RPL bootrom enabled with 802.2 frame type supported. Now I am able to remote boot with systems that has 3COM lan cards installed bcoz they support frane type eth_802.3 from any vlan. I.e. From the server vlan as well as across the Vlan also. I have respective IPX config done on my all the vlan interfaces with IPX helper addresses that helps in IPX packet forwarding across Vlan. However I am not able to boot with my RPL enabled bootrom (frame type 802.2) Across the Vlan. As per Cisco the 802.2 frame type is actually SAP broadcasts. But I am able to remote boot successfully with the same cards within the sererver vlan i.e. vlan 15. I see some problem in forwarding sap broadcasts across the Vlan. I am not too sure about the type of broadcasts or packet that the RPL enabled cards require to remote boot. I tried may settings on Novell server with the help of my Novell expert finally we came to conclusion that there is some settings/command to be configured on L3 i.e. My MSFC. I am attaching my L3 config here for the reference. Pls suggest something. Router-L3#sh run Building configuration... Current configuration : 4348 bytes ! version 12.1 no service pad service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime service password-encryption ! hostname Router-L3 ! boot system flash bootflash:c6msfc-dsv-mz.121-8a.E4.bin logging buffered 1 debugging logging trap notifications logging 10.112.5.231 enable secret 5 $1$G9U7$GWzOMuJa/p2NxsiJUAMom. enable password 7 00060305080A59555B ! ip subnet-zero ! ! ! ipx routing 0002.7e26.595c ipx internal-network BABE ! class-map match-any http-hacks match protocol http url *readme.url* ! mls rp ip ! ! ! interface Vlan5 description Training Center ip address 10.112.5.2 255.255.255.0 ip helper-address 10.112.15.63 ip helper-address 10.112.15.92 no ip redirects ipx helper-address E11.0002.5558.519b ipx network E19 mls rp ip standby 5 priority 120 preempt standby 5 ip 10.112.5.1 ! interface Vlan6 description FEO-Vlan ip address 10.112.6.2 255.255.255.0 ip helper-address 10.112.15.63 no ip redirects ipx helper-address E11.0002.5558.519b ipx network E20 mls rp ip standby 6 priority 120 preempt standby 6 ip 10.112.6.1 ! interface Vlan7 description Admin4 Vlan ip address 10.112.7.2 255.255.255.0 ip helper-address 10.112.15.63 no ip redirects ipx helper-address E11.0002.5558.519b ipx network E21 mls rp ip standby 7 priority 120 preempt standby 7 ip 10.112.7.1 ! interface Vlan8 description Admin1 vlan ip address 10.112.8.2 255.255.255.0 ip helper-address 10.112.15.63 no ip redirects ipx helper-address E11.0002.5558.519b ipx network E12 mls rp ip standby 8 priority 120 preempt standby 8 ip 10.112.8.1 ! interface Vlan9 description Admin2 vlan ip address 10.112.9.2 255.255.255.0 ip helper-address 10.112.15.63 no ip redirects ipx helper-address E11.0002.5558.519b ipx network E13 mls rp ip standby 9 priority 120 preempt standby 9 ip 10.112.9.1 ! interface Vlan10 description Admin3 vlan ip address 10.112.10.2 255.255.255.0 ip helper-address 10.112.15.63 no ip redirects ipx helper-address E11.0002.5558.519b ipx network E14 mls rp ip standby 10 priority 120 preempt standby 10 ip 10.112.10.1 ! interface Vlan11 description CSS vlan ip address 10.112.11.2 255.255.255.0 ip helper-address 10.112.15.63 no ip redirects ipx helper-address E11.0002.5558.519b ipx helper-address D11.0002.5558.519b ipx sap-helper D11.0002.5558.519b ipx network E15 ipx network D15 encapsulation SAP secondary mls rp ip standby 11 priority 120 preempt standby 11 ip 10.112.11.1 ! interface Vlan12 description Ad-S-2,W/H ip address 10.112.12.2 255.255.255.0 ip helper-address 10.112.15.63 no ip redirects ipx helper-address E11.0002.5558.519b ipx network E16 mls rp ip standby 12 priority 120 preempt standby 12 ip 10.112.12.1 ! interface Vlan13 description TDU vlan ip address 10.112.13.2 255.255.255.0 ip helper-address 10.112.15.63 no ip redirects ipx helper-address E11.0002.5558.519b ipx network E17 mls rp ip standby 13 priority 120 preempt standby 13 ip 10.112.13.1 ! interface Vlan14 description CCR vlan ip address 10.112.14.2 255.255.255.0 ip helper-address 10.112.15.63 no ip redirects ipx helper-address E11.0002.5558.519b ipx network E18 mls rp ip standby 14 priority 120 preempt standby 14 ip 10.112.14.1 ! interface Vlan15 description Servers vlan ip address 10.112.15.2
Nortel passport 2430 to Cisco 770 router [7:45582]
Hi..! I am Trying to dailout Cisco 770 Router to Nortel passport Router The ISDN connectivity stays only for around 2-30 secs. on Nortel I get the specific log...please see log no 29.(Failed to locate `delhi` in WHOAMI tabledoes anyone know what it means) I tried without authentication ...plan ppp but still i get this same error. # 22: 06/01/2002 01:25:06.100 INFO SLOT 1 SWSERV Code: 68 ISDN Setup Indication with Call ID 169, Channel B1 on DSL 0. # 23: 06/01/2002 01:25:06.102 INFO SLOT 1 SWSERV Code: 94 ISDN Call ID 169: Received Setup from NONE for NONE. # 24: 06/01/2002 01:25:06.106 INFO SLOT 1 SWSERV Code: 77 ISDN Connect Request for Call ID 169 on DSL 0. # 25: 06/01/2002 01:25:06.218 INFO SLOT 1 SWSERV Code: 83 ISDN Connect Confirm Indication for Call ID 169 on DSL 0. # 26: 06/01/2002 01:25:06.254 INFO SLOT 1 PPPCode: 200 Link layer for line 201301:0 initializing for circuit 65535. # 27: 06/01/2002 01:25:07.089 INFO SLOT 1 PPPCode: 142 Link Establishment Phase complete on line 201301:0, circuit 65535. # 28: 06/01/2002 01:25:07.093 INFO SLOT 1 PPPCode: 132 LCP up on line 201301:0, circuit 65535. # 29: 06/01/2002 01:25:07.101 WARNING SLOT 1 PPPCode: 98 Failed to locate `delhi` in WHOAMI table. # 30: 06/01/2002 01:25:07.130 INFO SLOT 1 PPPCode: 29 LCP down on circuit -1. # 31: 06/01/2002 01:25:07.824 INFO SLOT 1 SWSERV Code: 71 ISDN Disconnect Indication for Call ID 169 with Cause 16 (NORMAL CLEARING) on D SL 0. # 32: 06/01/2002 01:25:07.825 INFO SLOT 1 SWSERV Code: 76 ISDN Clear Request for Call ID 169 on DSL 0. # 33: 06/01/2002 01:25:07.829 INFO SLOT 1 SWSERV Code: 135 ISDN Connection Terminated for Call ID 169, Channel B1 on DSL 0. Duration of call from NONE to NONE is 0 mins 1 secs. # 34: 06/01/2002 01:25:07.926 INFO SLOT 1 SWSERV Code: 63 ISDN Clear Confirm for Call ID 169 on DSL 0. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=45582t=45582 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE Written passed - Boson [7:45535]
I'm sure this will get deleted also, but I would at least like to add that there's no reason to pay for something you can get for free. go to google and try typing ccie cheat Bingo, the Global Document Database has a TON of great stuff! Clayton Dukes Cisco Info Center SE CCNA, CCDA, CCDP, CCNP, NCC - Original Message - From: Kaminski, Shawn G To: Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 5:02 PM Subject: RE: CCIE Written passed - Boson [7:45535] Well, if the moderators let this through, I'll probably get flamed to death because I'm always pushing CCxx Productions. Why? Because I wrote most of the materials. However, I can guarantee that they cover the exact same topics as Boson at a much better price. The difference is that you get the materials in Microsoft Word format instead of a test engine. But the advantage of that is that you can transport the materials anywhere you want. With Boson, you can only put the materials on one PC. Flame away Shawn K. -Original Message- From: Hamid [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 2:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE Written passed - Boson [7:45535] What matterials do you mean by 29.95$? Hamid Kaminski, Shawn G wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... You spent $80.00 on Boson tests when you could have gotten materials that cover the exact same topics for $29.95? Shame on you! Congrats! Shawn K. -Original Message- From: Pierre-Alex Guanel [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 12:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE Written passed - Boson [7:45535] I took the CCIE written yesterday afternoon and passed (80%) I was expecting more, but I flunked the performance/QoS section of the exam, which I neglected somewhat during preparation. I used both Boson #1 and Boson #3. Those 2 tests are complementary and are NOT substitute for each other. Boson #3 focuses on SNA issues where as Boson #1 focuses on the other networking topics. If you can, you should purchase both tests. For preparation I did a pre-test on Boson #3 and discovered how little SNA and ATM I knew. For 3 weeks, I studied SNA and ATM using CCO + hands-on until the whole thing felt natural. Then, on the 4th week of preparation I repeated the same strategy with Boson #1. I dicovered 3 areas of networking where I had some weaknesses. I only had time to work on 2 of them thoroughly before the test. Thank you to Bernard and Dennis for excellent test materials and to all those who gracefully took the time to answer my questions. I particularly want to thank Priscilla and Leigh Anne who both put me back on track several times during the last two years and Daniel Cotts for squeezing some time out of his busy schedule to spend some time discussing Cisco with me. Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=45583t=45535 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
access-list question? [7:45585]
If I wanted to apply a access list to allow only networks from 192.168.1.0 to 192.168.7.0 and apply it to the vty lines is this correct access-list 101 allow tcp 192.168.1.0 0.0.6.255 eq 23 any ? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=45585t=45585 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help reqd on Inter Vlan IPX/SAP traffic forwarding [7:45586]
Are you sure your RPL enabled bootrom PCs really need SAP broadcasts to boot? SAP has two meanings in the Novell world. Don't confuse them. Service Advertising Protocol (SAP) sends broadcasts to advertise services. An Ethernet Frame Type of SAP simply means that the frame contains an 802.3 and 802.2 header. The 802.2 header has a Destination Service Access Point (SAP) and a Source Service Access Point. It's unfortunate that Cisco calls this sap. Novell calls it Ethernet_802.2. The other common Ethernet encapsulation is novell-ether. That has just an 802.3 header. Cisco calls this novell-ether. It's the default. Novell calls it Ethernet_802.3. (There are two others also, Ethernet II and SNAP but they aren't relevant.) On your VLAN 11 where the clients reside, you have clients that use both Ethernet_802.3 and Ethernet_802.2. On that VLAN you will need two IPX network numbers, each using a different encapsulation: ipx network ipx network encap sap secondary Oh, I just noticed that you already have that. I doubt that you need the ipx sap helper address. (I don't think they really use the Service Advertising Protocol). Also, the ipx helper address can just be in there once and point to the same one that all the others point to. I think you can get rid of these lines: ipx helper-address D11.0002.5558.519b ipx sap-helper D11.0002.5558.519b Priscilla At 03:16 AM 6/1/02, Hitesh Pathak R wrote: Dear Group I am configuring the IPX/SAP traffic forwarding between Vlan's on a catalyst 6006 with MSFC. The scenario is like this :- cat6506(CORE)-cat4003(DISTRIBUTION)-cat2924(Access)clients 1) Vlan no. 15 Server Vlan All my servers are connected to this Vlan. I have a Nolell 5.0 server also placed in this Vlan. 2)Vlan No 11 Client Vlan All my users are connected to this Vlan. There are some machines which requires to remote boot (Novell server). I have 2 combination of NIC's. Number 1 is 802.3 frame type supported 2nd is RPL bootrom enabled with 802.2 frame type supported. Now I am able to remote boot with systems that has 3COM lan cards installed bcoz they support frane type eth_802.3 from any vlan. I.e. From the server vlan as well as across the Vlan also. I have respective IPX config done on my all the vlan interfaces with IPX helper addresses that helps in IPX packet forwarding across Vlan. However I am not able to boot with my RPL enabled bootrom (frame type 802.2) Across the Vlan. As per Cisco the 802.2 frame type is actually SAP broadcasts. But I am able to remote boot successfully with the same cards within the sererver vlan i.e. vlan 15. I see some problem in forwarding sap broadcasts across the Vlan. I am not too sure about the type of broadcasts or packet that the RPL enabled cards require to remote boot. I tried may settings on Novell server with the help of my Novell expert finally we came to conclusion that there is some settings/command to be configured on L3 i.e. My MSFC. I am attaching my L3 config here for the reference. Pls suggest something. Router-L3#sh run Building configuration... Current configuration : 4348 bytes ! version 12.1 no service pad service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime service password-encryption ! hostname Router-L3 ! boot system flash bootflash:c6msfc-dsv-mz.121-8a.E4.bin logging buffered 1 debugging logging trap notifications logging 10.112.5.231 enable secret 5 $1$G9U7$GWzOMuJa/p2NxsiJUAMom. enable password 7 00060305080A59555B ! ip subnet-zero ! ! ! ipx routing 0002.7e26.595c ipx internal-network BABE ! class-map match-any http-hacks match protocol http url *readme.url* ! mls rp ip ! ! ! interface Vlan5 description Training Center ip address 10.112.5.2 255.255.255.0 ip helper-address 10.112.15.63 ip helper-address 10.112.15.92 no ip redirects ipx helper-address E11.0002.5558.519b ipx network E19 mls rp ip standby 5 priority 120 preempt standby 5 ip 10.112.5.1 ! interface Vlan6 description FEO-Vlan ip address 10.112.6.2 255.255.255.0 ip helper-address 10.112.15.63 no ip redirects ipx helper-address E11.0002.5558.519b ipx network E20 mls rp ip standby 6 priority 120 preempt standby 6 ip 10.112.6.1 ! interface Vlan7 description Admin4 Vlan ip address 10.112.7.2 255.255.255.0 ip helper-address 10.112.15.63 no ip redirects ipx helper-address E11.0002.5558.519b ipx network E21 mls rp ip standby 7 priority 120 preempt standby 7 ip 10.112.7.1 ! interface Vlan8 description Admin1 vlan ip address 10.112.8.2 255.255.255.0 ip helper-address 10.112.15.63 no ip redirects ipx helper-address E11.0002.5558.519b ipx network E12 mls rp ip standby 8 priority 120 preempt standby 8 ip 10.112.8.1 ! interface Vlan9 description Admin2 vlan ip address 10.112.9.2 255.255.255.0 ip helper-address 10.112.15.63 no ip redirects ipx helper-address E11.0002.5558.519b ipx network E13 mls rp ip standby 9 priority 120 preempt standby 9 ip
RE: CCIE Lab Reading [7:45486]
I bet Cisco is scratching their heads trying to find out why the sudden demand on IOS manuals... After 45 minutes of searching the Site I found where to order. I don't know that I would ever find it again So I started ordering things left and right I bet I have 25+ books coming... I finally have new books to read! Thanks Larry -Original Message- From: Eric Rogers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 8:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE Lab Reading [7:45486] Just ordered the complete copy of manuals for 12.2 IOS Documentation Set :-) THANKS for that info...I knew there was a reason for being on groupstudy... -Eric - Original Message - From: Brad Ellis To: Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 10:38 AM Subject: Re: CCIE Lab Reading [7:45486] John, I believe if you have a smartnet contract, you can get the IOS manuals free from Cisco (at least you could a couple years ago). thanks, -Brad Ellis CCIE#5796 (RS / Security) Network Learning Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.optsys.net (Cisco hardware) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Nemeth) wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... On Oct 20, 7:01pm, Chuck wrote: } } Someone who passed the lab recently advised me ( as have other folks who } have posted their success here and elsewhere ) that it remains CRITICAL that } you spend as much time as possible reading the command references as found } on CCO. Print as much out as you can. Study them. Knowing the knobs, knowing } where to find things is very helpful. eBay seller [EMAIL PROTECTED] often has complete sets of printed 12.2 manuals. The price seems to range from $100 to $200 (of course, shipping is a killer). I bought a set and they are quite nice to use for reference; although, they do take up four feet of shelf space (I need more book shelves). They are organised just like the doc CD, and you quickly learn what is where, since you can't just type a command name into a search box (I suppose you could cheat and look it up in the master index, but I haven't cracked that one open yet). }-- End of excerpt from Chuck Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=45584t=45486 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: access-list question? [7:45585]
If you are trying to restrict telnet access to the router to only those addresses (192.168.1.0 to 192.168.7.0), you need at least two lines in the access list. If you can let 192.168.0.0 /24 through as well, then you can get it down to one line. Rather than using an extended access list, you can use a standard access list and then apply it as an access class to the VTY lines. Something like this: access-list 31 deny 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255 access-list 31 permit 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.7.255 line vty 0 4 access class 31 in Forget the first line if you can let 192.168.0.0 /24 through. Anybody's welcome to chip in if I missed something, or even totally screwed it up. World Cup fever has hit and still recovering. (Any French list members - ho ho - sorry!) What do you call a Frenchman in the 2nd round of the world cup? Referee! Gaz GEORGE wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... If I wanted to apply a access list to allow only networks from 192.168.1.0 to 192.168.7.0 and apply it to the vty lines is this correct access-list 101 allow tcp 192.168.1.0 0.0.6.255 eq 23 any ? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=45588t=45585 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: access-list question? [7:45585]
VIVA AFRICA AND SENEGAL, NIGERIA TURN TO DO ARGENTINA NEXT. PORR SAUDI ARABIA - Original Message - From: Gaz To: Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 1:25 PM Subject: Re: access-list question? [7:45585] If you are trying to restrict telnet access to the router to only those addresses (192.168.1.0 to 192.168.7.0), you need at least two lines in the access list. If you can let 192.168.0.0 /24 through as well, then you can get it down to one line. Rather than using an extended access list, you can use a standard access list and then apply it as an access class to the VTY lines. Something like this: access-list 31 deny 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255 access-list 31 permit 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.7.255 line vty 0 4 access class 31 in Forget the first line if you can let 192.168.0.0 /24 through. Anybody's welcome to chip in if I missed something, or even totally screwed it up. World Cup fever has hit and still recovering. (Any French list members - ho ho - sorry!) What do you call a Frenchman in the 2nd round of the world cup? Referee! Gaz GEORGE wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... If I wanted to apply a access list to allow only networks from 192.168.1.0 to 192.168.7.0 and apply it to the vty lines is this correct access-list 101 allow tcp 192.168.1.0 0.0.6.255 eq 23 any ? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=45589t=45585 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: teaching CCNA [7:45489]
Back in 1999, most vendor certs were pretty intolerant regarding the use of abbreviations in answers to fill-in-the-blank syntax questions. I suspect that had more to do with limitations of the testing software and the overwhelming desire to not compensate people for the effort required to rectify the situation rather than an insistence that people type thousands of more characters than they need to in order to do their job. - Original Message - From: Priscilla Oppenheimer To: Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 11:02 PM Subject: teaching CCNA [7:45489] I will be teaching a CCNA class next week. I've never taught an intro class before. ;-) The textbook will be Wendell Odom's Cisco CCNA Exam #640-607 Certification Guide. I didn't choose it, but I'm fine with it. I have some questions, however: Wendell covers Catalyst 1900 configuration in quite a bit of detail. Cisco's list of topics for 640-607 doesn't include this, so I'm not planning to teach it, and in fact, we won't have a switch in the lab probably. Will this be OK? Does anyone know if the 640-607 test has Catalyst 1900 configuration questions?? Does anyone know if the test (which now includes router simulation questions) allows one to use abbreviations for commands? (such as cop run start instead of copy running-config startup-config)? Token Ring doesn't support multicast (He says this many times.) I know IEEE 802.5 does officially support it. I also know that many Token Ring NICs didn't support it in the early 1990s. Didn't they fix that??? I would have thought that Token Ring NIC vendors would have added support for multicast by now. Thanks! Priscilla Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=45590t=45489 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Off Topic - inauspicious beginning [7:45592]
183 days and counting. like the Flying Dutchman, I'll pass the Lab if... nope - better not make that threat. you never can tell.. actually, the gods of the Lab have already started with me. I haven't had the routers on in quite a few weeks. Been busy at work. Had some big projects to keep me out of my own lab for a while. So I have a customer network that I need to clean up a few things on. I set up a model in my own lab, cable everything up to emulate the customer's situation, and begin. First step - configure the frame relay switch. try to get into enable mode. Keep getting asked for a password. Rats! What is the enable password? I try the usual suspects, and come up empty. no problem. I'll just do a quick password recovery. I do a search on CCO, quickly locate the procedure, and begin... power off. power on. control break. no luck - the router just boots as normal. hhm I've done recoveries before. no biggie. why am I having the problem? Now I know the smart guys among you will tell me it's because I use hyper terminal. so I close HT, and load up my copy of Tera Term. repeat the power off power on sequence, try alt b, and no luck. the router loads as usual. now I'm panicking. I have been trying this via my term server. I go directly into the router, replacing the term server cable with a direct connection. still no luck. alt b with Tera term, control break with hyper term. the router still loads as normal. Well, I've figured out the problem. I've gotten into the router. I'm happily working on my customer simulation. the frame switch is configured as I wish. the question to all of you - what was the problem? what was the solution? regards Chuck December 2 - 183 days and counting the gods of the Lab permitting ;- Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=45592t=45592 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE Written passed - Boson [7:45535]
Wait a minute. Bingo, I don't see a disclaimer after your message. Wouldn't it be fair to state that this is your site? Shawn K. -Original Message- From: Clayton Dukes [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 11:45 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE Written passed - Boson [7:45535] I'm sure this will get deleted also, but I would at least like to add that there's no reason to pay for something you can get for free. go to google and try typing ccie cheat Bingo, the Global Document Database has a TON of great stuff! Clayton Dukes Cisco Info Center SE CCNA, CCDA, CCDP, CCNP, NCC - Original Message - From: Kaminski, Shawn G To: Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 5:02 PM Subject: RE: CCIE Written passed - Boson [7:45535] Well, if the moderators let this through, I'll probably get flamed to death because I'm always pushing CCxx Productions. Why? Because I wrote most of the materials. However, I can guarantee that they cover the exact same topics as Boson at a much better price. The difference is that you get the materials in Microsoft Word format instead of a test engine. But the advantage of that is that you can transport the materials anywhere you want. With Boson, you can only put the materials on one PC. Flame away Shawn K. -Original Message- From: Hamid [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 2:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE Written passed - Boson [7:45535] What matterials do you mean by 29.95$? Hamid Kaminski, Shawn G wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... You spent $80.00 on Boson tests when you could have gotten materials that cover the exact same topics for $29.95? Shame on you! Congrats! Shawn K. -Original Message- From: Pierre-Alex Guanel [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 12:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE Written passed - Boson [7:45535] I took the CCIE written yesterday afternoon and passed (80%) I was expecting more, but I flunked the performance/QoS section of the exam, which I neglected somewhat during preparation. I used both Boson #1 and Boson #3. Those 2 tests are complementary and are NOT substitute for each other. Boson #3 focuses on SNA issues where as Boson #1 focuses on the other networking topics. If you can, you should purchase both tests. For preparation I did a pre-test on Boson #3 and discovered how little SNA and ATM I knew. For 3 weeks, I studied SNA and ATM using CCO + hands-on until the whole thing felt natural. Then, on the 4th week of preparation I repeated the same strategy with Boson #1. I dicovered 3 areas of networking where I had some weaknesses. I only had time to work on 2 of them thoroughly before the test. Thank you to Bernard and Dennis for excellent test materials and to all those who gracefully took the time to answer my questions. I particularly want to thank Priscilla and Leigh Anne who both put me back on track several times during the last two years and Daniel Cotts for squeezing some time out of his busy schedule to spend some time discussing Cisco with me. Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=45593t=45535 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic - inauspicious beginning [7:45592]
Sounds like it was a physical layer issue: bad rollover or, bad db9, or bad serial port on the computer Swapping out each of the above, one at a time, undoubtedly led to your solutionI think. The other possibility was that your keyboard was messed up and sending the wrong keystoke combos. Jason Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=45594t=45592 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE Written passed - Boson [7:45535]
Well, ok, but why does that matter? It's still there, and it's still very useful for anyone studying for thier exams :-) Clayton Dukes Cisco Info Center SE CCNA, CCDA, CCDP, CCNP, NCC - Original Message - From: Kaminski, Shawn G To: Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 2:41 PM Subject: RE: CCIE Written passed - Boson [7:45535] Wait a minute. Bingo, I don't see a disclaimer after your message. Wouldn't it be fair to state that this is your site? Shawn K. -Original Message- From: Clayton Dukes [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 11:45 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE Written passed - Boson [7:45535] I'm sure this will get deleted also, but I would at least like to add that there's no reason to pay for something you can get for free. go to google and try typing ccie cheat Bingo, the Global Document Database has a TON of great stuff! Clayton Dukes Cisco Info Center SE CCNA, CCDA, CCDP, CCNP, NCC - Original Message - From: Kaminski, Shawn G To: Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 5:02 PM Subject: RE: CCIE Written passed - Boson [7:45535] Well, if the moderators let this through, I'll probably get flamed to death because I'm always pushing CCxx Productions. Why? Because I wrote most of the materials. However, I can guarantee that they cover the exact same topics as Boson at a much better price. The difference is that you get the materials in Microsoft Word format instead of a test engine. But the advantage of that is that you can transport the materials anywhere you want. With Boson, you can only put the materials on one PC. Flame away Shawn K. -Original Message- From: Hamid [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 2:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE Written passed - Boson [7:45535] What matterials do you mean by 29.95$? Hamid Kaminski, Shawn G wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... You spent $80.00 on Boson tests when you could have gotten materials that cover the exact same topics for $29.95? Shame on you! Congrats! Shawn K. -Original Message- From: Pierre-Alex Guanel [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 12:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE Written passed - Boson [7:45535] I took the CCIE written yesterday afternoon and passed (80%) I was expecting more, but I flunked the performance/QoS section of the exam, which I neglected somewhat during preparation. I used both Boson #1 and Boson #3. Those 2 tests are complementary and are NOT substitute for each other. Boson #3 focuses on SNA issues where as Boson #1 focuses on the other networking topics. If you can, you should purchase both tests. For preparation I did a pre-test on Boson #3 and discovered how little SNA and ATM I knew. For 3 weeks, I studied SNA and ATM using CCO + hands-on until the whole thing felt natural. Then, on the 4th week of preparation I repeated the same strategy with Boson #1. I dicovered 3 areas of networking where I had some weaknesses. I only had time to work on 2 of them thoroughly before the test. Thank you to Bernard and Dennis for excellent test materials and to all those who gracefully took the time to answer my questions. I particularly want to thank Priscilla and Leigh Anne who both put me back on track several times during the last two years and Daniel Cotts for squeezing some time out of his busy schedule to spend some time discussing Cisco with me. Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=45595t=45535 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic - inauspicious beginning [7:45592]
Im guessing wrong port You were plugged into the Aux in place of the Console...?? Thanks Larry -Original Message- From: Jason Weden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 1:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Off Topic - inauspicious beginning [7:45592] Sounds like it was a physical layer issue: bad rollover or, bad db9, or bad serial port on the computer Swapping out each of the above, one at a time, undoubtedly led to your solutionI think. The other possibility was that your keyboard was messed up and sending the wrong keystoke combos. Jason Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=45596t=45592 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic - inauspicious beginning [7:45592]
Perhaps the Allow Break Sequence bit was disabled from a previous change in the confreg setting!?!? If this was the case, you had to pop the top of your Frame Switch router and do temp. jumper change that resets the config register settings back to factory defaults. I'll be interested to know what the answer was :) Have a great weekend to all! Mark -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chuck Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 1:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Off Topic - inauspicious beginning [7:45592] 183 days and counting. like the Flying Dutchman, I'll pass the Lab if... nope - better not make that threat. you never can tell.. actually, the gods of the Lab have already started with me. I haven't had the routers on in quite a few weeks. Been busy at work. Had some big projects to keep me out of my own lab for a while. So I have a customer network that I need to clean up a few things on. I set up a model in my own lab, cable everything up to emulate the customer's situation, and begin. First step - configure the frame relay switch. try to get into enable mode. Keep getting asked for a password. Rats! What is the enable password? I try the usual suspects, and come up empty. no problem. I'll just do a quick password recovery. I do a search on CCO, quickly locate the procedure, and begin... power off. power on. control break. no luck - the router just boots as normal. hhm I've done recoveries before. no biggie. why am I having the problem? Now I know the smart guys among you will tell me it's because I use hyper terminal. so I close HT, and load up my copy of Tera Term. repeat the power off power on sequence, try alt b, and no luck. the router loads as usual. now I'm panicking. I have been trying this via my term server. I go directly into the router, replacing the term server cable with a direct connection. still no luck. alt b with Tera term, control break with hyper term. the router still loads as normal. Well, I've figured out the problem. I've gotten into the router. I'm happily working on my customer simulation. the frame switch is configured as I wish. the question to all of you - what was the problem? what was the solution? regards Chuck December 2 - 183 days and counting the gods of the Lab permitting ;- Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=45597t=45592 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE Written passed - Boson [7:45535]
Here's why it matters: I had a discussion with Paul Borghese (owner of Groupstudy) a while back regarding messages on this list that are from people trying to tout their websites or products. As long as the messages are helping someone with a problem on this list (which you were, and that's cool) and the person writing the message makes note of their involvement with the product or service, then the message is in good taste. Paul doesn't want this list to become a list of advertisements for anyone who has a Cisco product to sell, which I can understand. That's why whenever I mention CCxx Productions, Network Learning, Quizware, or Boson (whom I'm not too fond of right now) when trying to help someone with a certification question or trying to help them save money on their certification study materials, I make note of any involvement that I've had with them in the past, present, or future. Shawn K. -Original Message- From: Clayton Dukes [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 3:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE Written passed - Boson [7:45535] Well, ok, but why does that matter? It's still there, and it's still very useful for anyone studying for thier exams :-) Clayton Dukes Cisco Info Center SE CCNA, CCDA, CCDP, CCNP, NCC - Original Message - From: Kaminski, Shawn G To: Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 2:41 PM Subject: RE: CCIE Written passed - Boson [7:45535] Wait a minute. Bingo, I don't see a disclaimer after your message. Wouldn't it be fair to state that this is your site? Shawn K. -Original Message- From: Clayton Dukes [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 11:45 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE Written passed - Boson [7:45535] I'm sure this will get deleted also, but I would at least like to add that there's no reason to pay for something you can get for free. go to google and try typing ccie cheat Bingo, the Global Document Database has a TON of great stuff! Clayton Dukes Cisco Info Center SE CCNA, CCDA, CCDP, CCNP, NCC - Original Message - From: Kaminski, Shawn G To: Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 5:02 PM Subject: RE: CCIE Written passed - Boson [7:45535] Well, if the moderators let this through, I'll probably get flamed to death because I'm always pushing CCxx Productions. Why? Because I wrote most of the materials. However, I can guarantee that they cover the exact same topics as Boson at a much better price. The difference is that you get the materials in Microsoft Word format instead of a test engine. But the advantage of that is that you can transport the materials anywhere you want. With Boson, you can only put the materials on one PC. Flame away Shawn K. -Original Message- From: Hamid [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 2:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE Written passed - Boson [7:45535] What matterials do you mean by 29.95$? Hamid Kaminski, Shawn G wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... You spent $80.00 on Boson tests when you could have gotten materials that cover the exact same topics for $29.95? Shame on you! Congrats! Shawn K. -Original Message- From: Pierre-Alex Guanel [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 12:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE Written passed - Boson [7:45535] I took the CCIE written yesterday afternoon and passed (80%) I was expecting more, but I flunked the performance/QoS section of the exam, which I neglected somewhat during preparation. I used both Boson #1 and Boson #3. Those 2 tests are complementary and are NOT substitute for each other. Boson #3 focuses on SNA issues where as Boson #1 focuses on the other networking topics. If you can, you should purchase both tests. For preparation I did a pre-test on Boson #3 and discovered how little SNA and ATM I knew. For 3 weeks, I studied SNA and ATM using CCO + hands-on until the whole thing felt natural. Then, on the 4th week of preparation I repeated the same strategy with Boson #1. I dicovered 3 areas of networking where I had some weaknesses. I only had time to work on 2 of them thoroughly before the test. Thank you to Bernard and Dennis for excellent test materials and to all those who gracefully took the time to answer my questions. I particularly want to thank Priscilla and Leigh Anne who both put me back on track several times during the last two years and Daniel
RE: CCIE Written passed - Boson [7:45535]
I love how all these guys use boson as the point of comparison. That alone tells me something. When I passed the written I used several of the popular books, including reading Caslow and Doyle, which are more for the lab, but are great books. Then I tested myself with the #1 and #3 bosons; and they were great. One of them, and I don't remember which, had something like 400 questions and was right on the money. Lastly, the current version of the written is going away soon, and if anybody is getting ready to test out, they should have multiple sources of study. Definitely read the popular books, review the public domain cramsessions that are around, and download a couple of these practice test things. The test costs $300 (or at least it did when I took it, I think it's more now), and buying ALL the popular books, the bosons AND shawn's home grown ms word document thingy is less then the price of failing just once and having to take it again. Just my $.02 (was that a gentle enough flame?) -Nic From: Kaminski, Shawn G Reply-To: Kaminski, Shawn G To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCIE Written passed - Boson [7:45535] Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 17:02:26 -0400 Well, if the moderators let this through, I'll probably get flamed to death because I'm always pushing CCxx Productions. Why? Because I wrote most of the materials. However, I can guarantee that they cover the exact same topics as Boson at a much better price. The difference is that you get the materials in Microsoft Word format instead of a test engine. But the advantage of that is that you can transport the materials anywhere you want. With Boson, you can only put the materials on one PC. Flame away Shawn K. -Original Message- From: Hamid [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 2:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: CCIE Written passed - Boson [7:45535] What matterials do you mean by 29.95$? Hamid Kaminski, Shawn G wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... You spent $80.00 on Boson tests when you could have gotten materials that cover the exact same topics for $29.95? Shame on you! Congrats! Shawn K. -Original Message- From: Pierre-Alex Guanel [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 12:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE Written passed - Boson [7:45535] I took the CCIE written yesterday afternoon and passed (80%) I was expecting more, but I flunked the performance/QoS section of the exam, which I neglected somewhat during preparation. I used both Boson #1 and Boson #3. Those 2 tests are complementary and are NOT substitute for each other. Boson #3 focuses on SNA issues where as Boson #1 focuses on the other networking topics. If you can, you should purchase both tests. For preparation I did a pre-test on Boson #3 and discovered how little SNA and ATM I knew. For 3 weeks, I studied SNA and ATM using CCO + hands-on until the whole thing felt natural. Then, on the 4th week of preparation I repeated the same strategy with Boson #1. I dicovered 3 areas of networking where I had some weaknesses. I only had time to work on 2 of them thoroughly before the test. Thank you to Bernard and Dennis for excellent test materials and to all those who gracefully took the time to answer my questions. I particularly want to thank Priscilla and Leigh Anne who both put me back on track several times during the last two years and Daniel Cotts for squeezing some time out of his busy schedule to spend some time discussing Cisco with me. Pierre-Alex _ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=45599t=45535 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic - inauspicious beginning [7:45592]
Out of curiosity, what model router is the frame switch? Shawn K. -Original Message- From: Chuck [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 2:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Off Topic - inauspicious beginning [7:45592] 183 days and counting. like the Flying Dutchman, I'll pass the Lab if... nope - better not make that threat. you never can tell.. actually, the gods of the Lab have already started with me. I haven't had the routers on in quite a few weeks. Been busy at work. Had some big projects to keep me out of my own lab for a while. So I have a customer network that I need to clean up a few things on. I set up a model in my own lab, cable everything up to emulate the customer's situation, and begin. First step - configure the frame relay switch. try to get into enable mode. Keep getting asked for a password. Rats! What is the enable password? I try the usual suspects, and come up empty. no problem. I'll just do a quick password recovery. I do a search on CCO, quickly locate the procedure, and begin... power off. power on. control break. no luck - the router just boots as normal. hhm I've done recoveries before. no biggie. why am I having the problem? Now I know the smart guys among you will tell me it's because I use hyper terminal. so I close HT, and load up my copy of Tera Term. repeat the power off power on sequence, try alt b, and no luck. the router loads as usual. now I'm panicking. I have been trying this via my term server. I go directly into the router, replacing the term server cable with a direct connection. still no luck. alt b with Tera term, control break with hyper term. the router still loads as normal. Well, I've figured out the problem. I've gotten into the router. I'm happily working on my customer simulation. the frame switch is configured as I wish. the question to all of you - what was the problem? what was the solution? regards Chuck December 2 - 183 days and counting the gods of the Lab permitting ;- Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=45600t=45592 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE Written passed - Boson [7:45535]
That was a fair enough flame. HOWEVER, :-) the reason Boson is used as the comparison is because people are cultified (is that a word?) with them even though they could get CCIE Written materials for $50.00 less than Boson that cover the EXACT SAME TOPICS! WHY IS THAT? ARE PEOPLE AFRAID OF CHANGE, OR WHAT? Doesn't that tell you something? It would sure tell me something! Like, what could I do with an extra $50.00 in my pocket! Shawn K. -Original Message- From: Nick Lesewski [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 5:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCIE Written passed - Boson [7:45535] I love how all these guys use boson as the point of comparison. That alone tells me something. When I passed the written I used several of the popular books, including reading Caslow and Doyle, which are more for the lab, but are great books. Then I tested myself with the #1 and #3 bosons; and they were great. One of them, and I don't remember which, had something like 400 questions and was right on the money. Lastly, the current version of the written is going away soon, and if anybody is getting ready to test out, they should have multiple sources of study. Definitely read the popular books, review the public domain cramsessions that are around, and download a couple of these practice test things. The test costs $300 (or at least it did when I took it, I think it's more now), and buying ALL the popular books, the bosons AND shawn's home grown ms word document thingy is less then the price of failing just once and having to take it again. Just my $.02 (was that a gentle enough flame?) -Nic From: Kaminski, Shawn G Reply-To: Kaminski, Shawn G To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCIE Written passed - Boson [7:45535] Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 17:02:26 -0400 Well, if the moderators let this through, I'll probably get flamed to death because I'm always pushing CCxx Productions. Why? Because I wrote most of the materials. However, I can guarantee that they cover the exact same topics as Boson at a much better price. The difference is that you get the materials in Microsoft Word format instead of a test engine. But the advantage of that is that you can transport the materials anywhere you want. With Boson, you can only put the materials on one PC. Flame away Shawn K. -Original Message- From: Hamid [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 2:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE Written passed - Boson [7:45535] What matterials do you mean by 29.95$? Hamid Kaminski, Shawn G wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... You spent $80.00 on Boson tests when you could have gotten materials that cover the exact same topics for $29.95? Shame on you! Congrats! Shawn K. -Original Message- From: Pierre-Alex Guanel [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 12:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE Written passed - Boson [7:45535] I took the CCIE written yesterday afternoon and passed (80%) I was expecting more, but I flunked the performance/QoS section of the exam, which I neglected somewhat during preparation. I used both Boson #1 and Boson #3. Those 2 tests are complementary and are NOT substitute for each other. Boson #3 focuses on SNA issues where as Boson #1 focuses on the other networking topics. If you can, you should purchase both tests. For preparation I did a pre-test on Boson #3 and discovered how little SNA and ATM I knew. For 3 weeks, I studied SNA and ATM using CCO + hands-on until the whole thing felt natural. Then, on the 4th week of preparation I repeated the same strategy with Boson #1. I dicovered 3 areas of networking where I had some weaknesses. I only had time to work on 2 of them thoroughly before the test. Thank you to Bernard and Dennis for excellent test materials and to all those who gracefully took the time to answer my questions. I particularly want to thank Priscilla and Leigh Anne who both put me back on track several times during the last two years and Daniel Cotts for squeezing some time out of his busy schedule to spend some time discussing Cisco with me. Pierre-Alex _ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=45601t=45535 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL
NAT - something new ( to me ) [7:45602]
OK, this has been a fun day in the lab! Truly! To emulate a customer network so I can solve a particular customer problem, I have to emulate a multiport PIX on one of my routers. How to do so? That is, how to have multiple outside NAT pools, such that a translation out one interface is different than a translation out another interface? The problem - to simulate such that there is The Internet out one interface, and a Business Partner Extranet out another. Obviously, internet bound traffic has to have public ip addresses, and the extranet traffic has to appear as a certain private subnet. the other problem is that the inside network consists of a number of branch offices, each connected to the central site via frame relay point to point subinterfaces. ( well, the customer's real network is ATM, but the principal is the same ) Can it be done? Start with a search of CCO. Lots of hits using the term nat, but one hit in particular looks promising: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/556/index.shtml scroll down the page and see this link: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/nat_routemap.html read it a while, think about it, draw up a plan, test it out. had to do a bit of tweaking, but damn! it works exactly the way I need it to work! Neat! interface Ethernet0 ip address 129.1.1.4 255.255.255.0 ip nat outside ! interface TokenRing0 ip address 10.1.1.254 255.255.255.252 ip nat outside ring-speed 4 ! ! NOTE the two interfaces identified as NAT outside !!! ! interface Serial0 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay no fair-queue ! interface Serial0.1 point-to-point description SOMHC ip address 172.31.250.29 255.255.255.252 ip nat inside frame-relay interface-dlci 201 ! interface Serial0.2 point-to-point description NAHC ip address 172.31.250.1 255.255.255.252 ip nat inside frame-relay interface-dlci 202 ! interface Serial0.3 point-to-point description SAFMC ip address 172.31.250.9 255.255.255.252 ip nat inside frame-relay interface-dlci 203 ! interface Loopback0 ip address 172.31.1.1 255.255.255.255 ip nat inside ! ! !!! Note the four interfaces identified as NAT inside !!! ! ! interface Serial1 no ip address shutdown ! router eigrp 999 passive-interface Ethernet0 passive-interface Loopback0 passive-interface TokenRing0 network 172.31.0.0 no auto-summary no eigrp log-neighbor-changes ! ip nat pool 2internet 75.1.1.65 75.1.1.94 netmask 255.255.255.224 ip nat pool 2extranet 10.1.2.10 10.1.2.50 netmask 255.255.255.0 ip nat inside source route-map intointernet pool 2internet ip nat inside source route-map intoextranet pool 2extranet ip classless ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Ethernet0 ip route 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 TokenRing0 ip route 172.31.3.0 255.255.255.0 Serial0.2 ip route 172.31.5.0 255.255.255.0 Serial0.3 ip route 172.31.10.0 255.255.255.0 Serial0.1 no ip http server ! access-list 171 deny ip 172.31.0.0 0.0.255.255 host 10.1.1.1 access-list 171 permit ip 172.31.0.0 0.0.255.255 any access-list 172 permit ip 172.31.0.0 0.0.255.255 host 10.1.1.1 route-map intointernet permit 10 match ip address 171 ! route-map intoextranet permit 10 match ip address 172 ! check out the two different outputs of the show ip nat trans command: have to use extended ping to get the source addresses for the various interfaces. to the internet: SFCCC_Central#ping Protocol [ip]: Target IP address: 65.20.35.1 Repeat count [5]: Datagram size [100]: Timeout in seconds [2]: Extended commands [n]: y Source address or interface: loop 0 Type of service [0]: Set DF bit in IP header? [no]: Validate reply data? [no]: Data pattern [0xABCD]: Loose, Strict, Record, Timestamp, Verbose[none]: Sweep range of sizes [n]: Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 65.20.35.1, timeout is 2 seconds: ! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 12/14/16 ms SFCCC_Central#sh ip nat trans Pro Inside global Inside local Outside local Outside global icmp 75.1.1.65:9704172.31.1.1:970465.20.35.1:970465.20.35.1:9704 icmp 75.1.1.65:9705172.31.1.1:970565.20.35.1:970565.20.35.1:9705 icmp 75.1.1.65:9706172.31.1.1:970665.20.35.1:970665.20.35.1:9706 icmp 75.1.1.65:9707172.31.1.1:970765.20.35.1:970765.20.35.1:9707 icmp 75.1.1.65:9708172.31.1.1:970865.20.35.1:970865.20.35.1:9708 to the business partner extranet: SFCCC_Central#ping Protocol [ip]: Target IP address: 10.1.1.1 Repeat count [5]: Datagram size [100]: Timeout in seconds [2]: Extended commands [n]: y Source address or interface: loop 0 Type of service [0]: Set DF bit in IP header? [no]: Validate reply data? [no]: Data pattern [0xABCD]: Loose, Strict, Record, Timestamp, Verbose[none]: Sweep range of sizes [n]: Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.1.1.1, timeout is 2 seconds: ! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 8/8/8 ms SFCCC_Central#sh ip nat trans Pro Inside global
RE: CCIE Lab Reading [7:45486]
Can you provide some rough idea about where you found this on CCO ? -Original Message- From: Roberts, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 10:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCIE Lab Reading [7:45486] I bet Cisco is scratching their heads trying to find out why the sudden demand on IOS manuals... After 45 minutes of searching the Site I found where to order. I don't know that I would ever find it again So I started ordering things left and right I bet I have 25+ books coming... I finally have new books to read! Thanks Larry -Original Message- From: Eric Rogers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 8:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE Lab Reading [7:45486] Just ordered the complete copy of manuals for 12.2 IOS Documentation Set :-) THANKS for that info...I knew there was a reason for being on groupstudy... -Eric - Original Message - From: Brad Ellis To: Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 10:38 AM Subject: Re: CCIE Lab Reading [7:45486] John, I believe if you have a smartnet contract, you can get the IOS manuals free from Cisco (at least you could a couple years ago). thanks, -Brad Ellis CCIE#5796 (RS / Security) Network Learning Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.optsys.net (Cisco hardware) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Nemeth) wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... On Oct 20, 7:01pm, Chuck wrote: } } Someone who passed the lab recently advised me ( as have other folks who } have posted their success here and elsewhere ) that it remains CRITICAL that } you spend as much time as possible reading the command references as found } on CCO. Print as much out as you can. Study them. Knowing the knobs, knowing } where to find things is very helpful. eBay seller [EMAIL PROTECTED] often has complete sets of printed 12.2 manuals. The price seems to range from $100 to $200 (of course, shipping is a killer). I bought a set and they are quite nice to use for reference; although, they do take up four feet of shelf space (I need more book shelves). They are organised just like the doc CD, and you quickly learn what is where, since you can't just type a command name into a search box (I suppose you could cheat and look it up in the master index, but I haven't cracked that one open yet). }-- End of excerpt from Chuck Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=45587t=45486 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE Lab Reading [7:45486]
www.cisco.com/upgrade Click on Product upgrade, then launch product upgrade. Enter your Agreement number... I get a message that I have no hardware upgradeable ( or something to that affect ) and then an option to select documentation. It was so right in front of my face that I missed it... Thanks Larry -Original Message- From: Kunal Bhatia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 12:18 PM To: Roberts, Larry; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCIE Lab Reading [7:45486] Can you provide some rough idea about where you found this on CCO ? -Original Message- From: Roberts, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 10:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCIE Lab Reading [7:45486] I bet Cisco is scratching their heads trying to find out why the sudden demand on IOS manuals... After 45 minutes of searching the Site I found where to order. I don't know that I would ever find it again So I started ordering things left and right I bet I have 25+ books coming... I finally have new books to read! Thanks Larry -Original Message- From: Eric Rogers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 8:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE Lab Reading [7:45486] Just ordered the complete copy of manuals for 12.2 IOS Documentation Set :-) THANKS for that info...I knew there was a reason for being on groupstudy... -Eric - Original Message - From: Brad Ellis To: Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 10:38 AM Subject: Re: CCIE Lab Reading [7:45486] John, I believe if you have a smartnet contract, you can get the IOS manuals free from Cisco (at least you could a couple years ago). thanks, -Brad Ellis CCIE#5796 (RS / Security) Network Learning Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.optsys.net (Cisco hardware) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Nemeth) wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... On Oct 20, 7:01pm, Chuck wrote: } } Someone who passed the lab recently advised me ( as have other folks who } have posted their success here and elsewhere ) that it remains CRITICAL that } you spend as much time as possible reading the command references as found } on CCO. Print as much out as you can. Study them. Knowing the knobs, knowing } where to find things is very helpful. eBay seller [EMAIL PROTECTED] often has complete sets of printed 12.2 manuals. The price seems to range from $100 to $200 (of course, shipping is a killer). I bought a set and they are quite nice to use for reference; although, they do take up four feet of shelf space (I need more book shelves). They are organised just like the doc CD, and you quickly learn what is where, since you can't just type a command name into a search box (I suppose you could cheat and look it up in the master index, but I haven't cracked that one open yet). }-- End of excerpt from Chuck Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=45591t=45486 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE Lab Reading [7:45486]
www.cisco.com/upgrade Click on Product upgrade, then launch product upgrade. Enter your Agreement number... I get a message that I have no hardware upgradeable ( or something to that affect ) and then an option to select documentation. It was so right in front of my face that I missed it... Thanks Larry -Original Message- From: Kunal Bhatia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 12:18 PM To: Roberts, Larry; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCIE Lab Reading [7:45486] Can you provide some rough idea about where you found this on CCO ? -Original Message- From: Roberts, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 10:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCIE Lab Reading [7:45486] I bet Cisco is scratching their heads trying to find out why the sudden demand on IOS manuals... After 45 minutes of searching the Site I found where to order. I don't know that I would ever find it again So I started ordering things left and right I bet I have 25+ books coming... I finally have new books to read! Thanks Larry -Original Message- From: Eric Rogers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 8:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE Lab Reading [7:45486] Just ordered the complete copy of manuals for 12.2 IOS Documentation Set :-) THANKS for that info...I knew there was a reason for being on groupstudy... -Eric - Original Message - From: Brad Ellis To: Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 10:38 AM Subject: Re: CCIE Lab Reading [7:45486] John, I believe if you have a smartnet contract, you can get the IOS manuals free from Cisco (at least you could a couple years ago). thanks, -Brad Ellis CCIE#5796 (RS / Security) Network Learning Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.optsys.net (Cisco hardware) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Nemeth) wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... On Oct 20, 7:01pm, Chuck wrote: } } Someone who passed the lab recently advised me ( as have other folks who } have posted their success here and elsewhere ) that it remains CRITICAL that } you spend as much time as possible reading the command references as found } on CCO. Print as much out as you can. Study them. Knowing the knobs, knowing } where to find things is very helpful. eBay seller [EMAIL PROTECTED] often has complete sets of printed 12.2 manuals. The price seems to range from $100 to $200 (of course, shipping is a killer). I bought a set and they are quite nice to use for reference; although, they do take up four feet of shelf space (I need more book shelves). They are organised just like the doc CD, and you quickly learn what is where, since you can't just type a command name into a search box (I suppose you could cheat and look it up in the master index, but I haven't cracked that one open yet). }-- End of excerpt from Chuck Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=45591t=45486 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco PIX Failover Bundle [7:45603]
Hello all, Was wondering what is the main difference between the PIX Failover Bundle and say Unrestricted Bundle? Is it just the software? is the hardware similar? Can we upgrade ? If so how? Please enlighten me. Thanks. roe. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=45603t=45603 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Commands for AS5100 and AS5200. [7:45604]
Hi there, Can someone tell me the command(s) for Cisco`s AS5100 and AS5200 that checks -- 1)modem`s utilization (rather %age utilization), 2)modem and line quality and 3)the reason for being disconnected from the said access-servers. regards, SAH. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=45604t=45604 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Materials on Internet. [7:45426]
Check out www.hellocomputers.com or contact someone there 877-79 HELLO They have a great LAB book and www.ciscopress.com Suggested reading materials are listed under the CCIE program description on cisco's website...many of which are cisco press books. Dain. Hosui Tse wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hello, Besides the CISCO WebSite and this StudyGroup. Any good site for study CCIE? I cannot find the books that you guys said which is good for CCIE Study in HK. Can I find it (Soft copy) on the Net? FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=45605t=45426 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NAT - something new ( to me ) [7:45602]
Neat! NAT can be an interesting area. MarkO tipped me off to a life saver here: pad pad http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/static.html The scenario uses NAT. One or more of the inside hosts have a static NAT translation. There is a VPN tunnel terminating on the ip nat outside interface. How to make the inside host visable to both outside hosts and hosts on the other end of the tunnel? Traffic bound for the tunnel uses a route-map to bounce off i.e. use a loopback interface as an ip next-hop. -Original Message- From: Chuck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 7:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: NAT - something new ( to me ) [7:45602] OK, this has been a fun day in the lab! Truly! To emulate a customer network so I can solve a particular customer problem, I have to emulate a multiport PIX on one of my routers. How to do so? That is, how to have multiple outside NAT pools, such that a translation out one interface is different than a translation out another interface? The problem - to simulate such that there is The Internet out one interface, and a Business Partner Extranet out another. Obviously, internet bound traffic has to have public ip addresses, and the extranet traffic has to appear as a certain private subnet. the other problem is that the inside network consists of a number of branch offices, each connected to the central site via frame relay point to point subinterfaces. ( well, the customer's real network is ATM, but the principal is the same ) Can it be done? Start with a search of CCO. Lots of hits using the term nat, but one hit in particular looks promising: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/556/index.shtml scroll down the page and see this link: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/nat_routemap.html read it a while, think about it, draw up a plan, test it out. had to do a bit of tweaking, but damn! it works exactly the way I need it to work! Neat! interface Ethernet0 ip address 129.1.1.4 255.255.255.0 ip nat outside ! interface TokenRing0 ip address 10.1.1.254 255.255.255.252 ip nat outside ring-speed 4 ! ! NOTE the two interfaces identified as NAT outside !!! ! interface Serial0 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay no fair-queue ! interface Serial0.1 point-to-point description SOMHC ip address 172.31.250.29 255.255.255.252 ip nat inside frame-relay interface-dlci 201 ! interface Serial0.2 point-to-point description NAHC ip address 172.31.250.1 255.255.255.252 ip nat inside frame-relay interface-dlci 202 ! interface Serial0.3 point-to-point description SAFMC ip address 172.31.250.9 255.255.255.252 ip nat inside frame-relay interface-dlci 203 ! interface Loopback0 ip address 172.31.1.1 255.255.255.255 ip nat inside ! ! !!! Note the four interfaces identified as NAT inside !!! ! ! interface Serial1 no ip address shutdown ! router eigrp 999 passive-interface Ethernet0 passive-interface Loopback0 passive-interface TokenRing0 network 172.31.0.0 no auto-summary no eigrp log-neighbor-changes ! ip nat pool 2internet 75.1.1.65 75.1.1.94 netmask 255.255.255.224 ip nat pool 2extranet 10.1.2.10 10.1.2.50 netmask 255.255.255.0 ip nat inside source route-map intointernet pool 2internet ip nat inside source route-map intoextranet pool 2extranet ip classless ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Ethernet0 ip route 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 TokenRing0 ip route 172.31.3.0 255.255.255.0 Serial0.2 ip route 172.31.5.0 255.255.255.0 Serial0.3 ip route 172.31.10.0 255.255.255.0 Serial0.1 no ip http server ! access-list 171 deny ip 172.31.0.0 0.0.255.255 host 10.1.1.1 access-list 171 permit ip 172.31.0.0 0.0.255.255 any access-list 172 permit ip 172.31.0.0 0.0.255.255 host 10.1.1.1 route-map intointernet permit 10 match ip address 171 ! route-map intoextranet permit 10 match ip address 172 ! check out the two different outputs of the show ip nat trans command: have to use extended ping to get the source addresses for the various interfaces. to the internet: SFCCC_Central#ping Protocol [ip]: Target IP address: 65.20.35.1 Repeat count [5]: Datagram size [100]: Timeout in seconds [2]: Extended commands [n]: y Source address or interface: loop 0 Type of service [0]: Set DF bit in IP header? [no]: Validate reply data? [no]: Data pattern [0xABCD]: Loose, Strict, Record, Timestamp, Verbose[none]: Sweep range of sizes [n]: Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 65.20.35.1, timeout is 2 seconds: ! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 12/14/16 ms SFCCC_Central#sh ip nat trans Pro Inside global Inside local Outside local Outside global icmp 75.1.1.65:9704172.31.1.1:970465.20.35.1:9704 65.20.35.1:9704 icmp 75.1.1.65:9705172.31.1.1:970565.20.35.1:9705 65.20.35.1:9705
Re: CCIP - who is doing this one? [7:45443]
Tom Scott wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am going to get the CCIP, only one test away BSCI and I can't pass it because I simply don't know IS-IS. I wonder if the new BSCI book by Todd Lammle does a good job on ISIS? How difficult were the other two parts (QoS/multicasting and whatever specialty you chose) in comparison to the CCNP/CCDP certs (BSCN, BCMSN, BCRAN, CIT, CID)? I am getting it just to get it. I hope one day to get more money from it but I know this year I won't. Despite my dark predictions about when or if the CCIP will be included in the Cisco Academy curriculum, I'm a huge fan of CCIP and MPLS. According to the large service providers who made presentations at MPLScon in Washington last month, MPLS is already deployed and its use in core networks will continue to grow and accelerate. I think the same holds true for GMPLS in the high-speed optical core. Well, the thing is, service-providers, and especially the larger service-providers that are using MPLS (MPLS makes little sense for a small providers) place little stock in the value of certs, any certs. We all know how difficult it is to find decent work (non-cable monkey work) in an enterprise if all you hold is a cert. Well, it's really really really hard to find decent work at a large-provider if all you're bringing to the table is a cert. Large providers tend to behave as something of an old-boy's club, where for their good positions, they'll only hire somebody who's well established. Now, I'm not saying that you should stop learning. Learning is always good. And indeed the CCIP technologies are very interesting ones. I'm just saying that as far as what you might expect that these provider-oriented certs might do for your career, you need to keep these expectations in check. Enterprises are not going to care about things like MPLS for awhile, and large providers don't care much about certs. -- TT Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=45607t=45443 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE Written passed - Boson [7:45535]
How can one save $50.00 on a product that only costs $40 to begin with? Mike W. Kaminski, Shawn G wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... That was a fair enough flame. HOWEVER, :-) the reason Boson is used as the comparison is because people are cultified (is that a word?) with them even though they could get CCIE Written materials for $50.00 less than Boson that cover the EXACT SAME TOPICS! WHY IS THAT? ARE PEOPLE AFRAID OF CHANGE, OR WHAT? Doesn't that tell you something? It would sure tell me something! Like, what could I do with an extra $50.00 in my pocket! Shawn K. -Original Message- From: Nick Lesewski [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 5:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCIE Written passed - Boson [7:45535] I love how all these guys use boson as the point of comparison. That alone tells me something. When I passed the written I used several of the popular books, including reading Caslow and Doyle, which are more for the lab, but are great books. Then I tested myself with the #1 and #3 bosons; and they were great. One of them, and I don't remember which, had something like 400 questions and was right on the money. Lastly, the current version of the written is going away soon, and if anybody is getting ready to test out, they should have multiple sources of study. Definitely read the popular books, review the public domain cramsessions that are around, and download a couple of these practice test things. The test costs $300 (or at least it did when I took it, I think it's more now), and buying ALL the popular books, the bosons AND shawn's home grown ms word document thingy is less then the price of failing just once and having to take it again. Just my $.02 (was that a gentle enough flame?) -Nic From: Kaminski, Shawn G Reply-To: Kaminski, Shawn G To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCIE Written passed - Boson [7:45535] Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 17:02:26 -0400 Well, if the moderators let this through, I'll probably get flamed to death because I'm always pushing CCxx Productions. Why? Because I wrote most of the materials. However, I can guarantee that they cover the exact same topics as Boson at a much better price. The difference is that you get the materials in Microsoft Word format instead of a test engine. But the advantage of that is that you can transport the materials anywhere you want. With Boson, you can only put the materials on one PC. Flame away Shawn K. -Original Message- From: Hamid [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 2:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE Written passed - Boson [7:45535] What matterials do you mean by 29.95$? Hamid Kaminski, Shawn G wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... You spent $80.00 on Boson tests when you could have gotten materials that cover the exact same topics for $29.95? Shame on you! Congrats! Shawn K. -Original Message- From: Pierre-Alex Guanel [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 12:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE Written passed - Boson [7:45535] I took the CCIE written yesterday afternoon and passed (80%) I was expecting more, but I flunked the performance/QoS section of the exam, which I neglected somewhat during preparation. I used both Boson #1 and Boson #3. Those 2 tests are complementary and are NOT substitute for each other. Boson #3 focuses on SNA issues where as Boson #1 focuses on the other networking topics. If you can, you should purchase both tests. For preparation I did a pre-test on Boson #3 and discovered how little SNA and ATM I knew. For 3 weeks, I studied SNA and ATM using CCO + hands-on until the whole thing felt natural. Then, on the 4th week of preparation I repeated the same strategy with Boson #1. I dicovered 3 areas of networking where I had some weaknesses. I only had time to work on 2 of them thoroughly before the test. Thank you to Bernard and Dennis for excellent test materials and to all those who gracefully took the time to answer my questions. I particularly want to thank Priscilla and Leigh Anne who both put me back on track several times during the last two years and Daniel Cotts for squeezing some time out of his busy schedule to spend some time discussing Cisco with me. Pierre-Alex _ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx Message Posted at:
RE: Off Topic - inauspicious beginning [7:45592]
capslock on? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=45610t=45592 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Foundations 640-509 [7:45548]
Well, that just shows you how much I know about the Foundation exam. Anyway, I think most people will (like I) take the three exams by them self instead of the Foundation exam, as you will need to prepare yourself three times as much for it. Ole ~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ http://www.RouterChief.com ~ Need a Job? http://www.OleDrews.com/job ~ -Original Message- From: Peter Walker [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 6:06 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Foundations 640-509 [7:45548] I totally disagree with this statement. In the foundation exam you get three scores, one for each of the sections. You have to pass in all sections to pass the foundation exam. So if you are strong in two areas but not the third you are likely to fail the whole exam because of this one area. If you are weak in any area then Foundation is not the exam to take. Peter Walker --On Friday, May 31, 2002 5:58 PM -0400 Ole Drews Jensen wrote: On the other hand, if you are perfect in routing and switching, but not so good in remote access, Foundation might be better, as the percentage you answer wrong on remote access questions, will be a third the percentage compared to if you took it by it self. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=45611t=45548 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE Written passed - Boson [7:45535]
Nic said that he used both Boson 1 and 3. That's about $80.00 for questions/topics that are covered in other materials for $29.95. I could safely say that all the topics in all three Boson exams (about $120.00) are covered in other materials for only $29.95. If someone's got all three Bosons and wants to match topic for topic with CCxx materials, contact me offline. Shawn K. -Original Message- From: Michael L. Williams [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 11:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE Written passed - Boson [7:45535] How can one save $50.00 on a product that only costs $40 to begin with? Mike W. Kaminski, Shawn G wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... That was a fair enough flame. HOWEVER, :-) the reason Boson is used as the comparison is because people are cultified (is that a word?) with them even though they could get CCIE Written materials for $50.00 less than Boson that cover the EXACT SAME TOPICS! WHY IS THAT? ARE PEOPLE AFRAID OF CHANGE, OR WHAT? Doesn't that tell you something? It would sure tell me something! Like, what could I do with an extra $50.00 in my pocket! Shawn K. -Original Message- From: Nick Lesewski [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 5:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCIE Written passed - Boson [7:45535] I love how all these guys use boson as the point of comparison. That alone tells me something. When I passed the written I used several of the popular books, including reading Caslow and Doyle, which are more for the lab, but are great books. Then I tested myself with the #1 and #3 bosons; and they were great. One of them, and I don't remember which, had something like 400 questions and was right on the money. Lastly, the current version of the written is going away soon, and if anybody is getting ready to test out, they should have multiple sources of study. Definitely read the popular books, review the public domain cramsessions that are around, and download a couple of these practice test things. The test costs $300 (or at least it did when I took it, I think it's more now), and buying ALL the popular books, the bosons AND shawn's home grown ms word document thingy is less then the price of failing just once and having to take it again. Just my $.02 (was that a gentle enough flame?) -Nic From: Kaminski, Shawn G Reply-To: Kaminski, Shawn G To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCIE Written passed - Boson [7:45535] Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 17:02:26 -0400 Well, if the moderators let this through, I'll probably get flamed to death because I'm always pushing CCxx Productions. Why? Because I wrote most of the materials. However, I can guarantee that they cover the exact same topics as Boson at a much better price. The difference is that you get the materials in Microsoft Word format instead of a test engine. But the advantage of that is that you can transport the materials anywhere you want. With Boson, you can only put the materials on one PC. Flame away Shawn K. -Original Message- From: Hamid [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 2:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE Written passed - Boson [7:45535] What matterials do you mean by 29.95$? Hamid Kaminski, Shawn G wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... You spent $80.00 on Boson tests when you could have gotten materials that cover the exact same topics for $29.95? Shame on you! Congrats! Shawn K. -Original Message- From: Pierre-Alex Guanel [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 12:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE Written passed - Boson [7:45535] I took the CCIE written yesterday afternoon and passed (80%) I was expecting more, but I flunked the performance/QoS section of the exam, which I neglected somewhat during preparation. I used both Boson #1 and Boson #3. Those 2 tests are complementary and are NOT substitute for each other. Boson #3 focuses on SNA issues where as Boson #1 focuses on the other networking topics. If you can, you should purchase both tests. For preparation I did a pre-test on Boson #3 and discovered how little SNA and ATM I knew. For 3 weeks, I studied SNA and ATM using CCO + hands-on until the whole thing felt natural. Then, on the 4th week of preparation I repeated the same strategy with Boson #1. I dicovered 3 areas of networking where I had some weaknesses. I only had
Re: Please confirm (conf#af7cb1de951df84825fc988e6a7edd86) [7:45613]
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, You have tried to post to GroupStudy.com's Professional mailing list. Because the server does not recognize you as a confirmed poster, you will be required to authenticate that you are using a valid e-mail address and are not a spammer. By confirming this e-mail you certify that you are not sending Unsolicited Bulk Email (UBE). PLEASE DO NOT SEND YOUR ORIGINAL MESSAGE AGAIN! BY CONFIRMING THIS EMAIL YOUR ORIGINAL MESSAGE (WHICH IS NOW QUEUED IN THE SERVER) WILL BE POSTED. By confirming this e-mail you also certify the following: 1. The message does NOT break Cisco's Non-Disclosure requirements. 2. The message is NOT designed to advertise a commercial product. 3. You understand all postings become property of GroupStudy.com 4. You have searched the archives prior to posting. 5. The message is NOT inflammatory. 6. The message is NOT a test message. To confirm, simply reply to this message. No editing is necessary. Once confirmed, you will be able to post without additional confirmations. Welcome to GroupStudy.com! --ORIGINAL MESSAGE- From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 16 23:50:29 2002 Received: (from news@localhost) by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id XAA17141 GroupStudy Mailer; Thu, 16 May 2002 23:50:29 -0400 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Path: not-for-mail From: Swizzguy Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco Subject: Test Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 23:53:54 -0700 Organization: GroupStudy.com Discussion Groups Lines: 3 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.10.187.163 X-Trace: groupstudy.com 1021607429 17126 209.10.187.163 (17 May 2002 03:50:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] NNTP-Posting-Date: 17 May 2002 03:50:29 GMT X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.3018.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.3018.1300 __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=45613t=45613 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Multi-Port Serial Controller [7:45614]
Can someone recommend a Multi-Port Serial Controller that I can attach on my computer PCI slot, and connect to multiple router consoles. Any other ideas / inexpensive solutions. Thanks a lot. Nilesh Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=45614t=45614 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: access-list question? [7:45585]
If you are trying to limit access on connections to the vty lines then you should use a standard access list. Your config will look like the following: access-list 1 permit 192.168.1.0 0.0.6.255 line vty 0 4 transport input telnet access-class 1 in If you are trying to limit access for telnet sessions originating from your router connecting to other devices; then your config will look like this: access-list 1 permit 192.168.1.0 0.0.6.255 access-list 1 permit 192.168.1.0 0.0.6.255 line vty 0 4 transport input telnet transport output telnet access-class 1 out The reasoning here is that you dont need to go so far as to specify the transport protocol with an extended ACL when you can simply disable all other transport types on your VTYs and have fewer ACL headaches. You can combine these techniques to limit telnet sessions both inbound and outbound, but be careful not to lock your keys in the car! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=45615t=45585 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
