Qos wred !? [7:58243]
Hello ! I have a question regarding what qos i should use to solve this: I want to drop 1 packet out of 100 packets, wred feels like it but maybee there is some other solution ? Regards /per Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=58243&t=58243 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DHCP prefer Client-identifier as Hardware address [7:58244]
Hi, I am testing the DHCP feature. If i configure the manual DHCP pool with the hardware-address, it's not working. I must configure the client-identification. It's not a problem for station (prefix = 01). But client-identification's router is an ID as 0063.6973.636f.2d30.3030.342e.6331.3332.2e33.6538.302d.4661.302f.30 As somebody find a solution for this problem Configuration : no ip dhcp conflict logging ip dhcp excluded-address 138.22.11.129 138.22.11.134 ... ip dhcp pool Router3 host 138.22.11.130 255.255.255.128 hardware-address 0004.c132.3e80 1 (Router's MAC) bootfile c.cfg option 150 ip 138.22.11.132 ! ip dhcp pool Workstation #OK host 138.22.11.133 255.255.255.128 client-identifier 0100.5004.b4ee.0b default-router 138.22.11.131 ! ip dhcp pool Other network 138.22.11.128 255.255.255.128 default-router 138.22.11.131 ! If Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=58244&t=58244 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Qos wred !? [7:58243]
Wred is a congestion avoidance mechanism. It drop packed before queue : the mechanism is : when a packet arrive, the router calculate the avg precedence's queue : - if avg is less than min the packet is queueed - if avg is greater than minimum but less than maximum, the packet is queued or dropped depending of probability (by exemple 1/100) - if avg is greater than maximum the packet is dropped Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=58245&t=58243 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Little Help Please blocking pop ups and ads wi [7:58155]
Elijah Savage III wrote: > Nah Brad got children at home no porn for me but I know you are enjoying > it LOL. Hey thanks for the reply but I only surf on 1 computer but got 8 > on the network here where any child or visitor can sit down and get on > the net, I know a little overkill, but it is nice I get comments on it > all the time. Anyway was doing home work with my little girl today > looking up wolves and a porno pop up comes up that is rediculous. Anyway > thank you for replying I figured there was no other way. > using mozilla you can disable popup-windows... not a network-side solution, but... cya -bis Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=58242&t=58155 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help!!! about ccbootcamp lab1 [7:58239]
Hi all, I found that I can ping directly from spoke router to spoke router without configuations such as policy routing or frame-relay map command. Why? I used two cisco2501 connected as frame-relay switch. My IOS version is enterprise 121-16. Any replay appreciated. Thanks. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=58239&t=58239 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Qos wred !? [7:58243]
Hello ! Thank you Olivier i think i found the solution #random-detect precedence 5 200 1000 100 where the should bee every 100 packet. One more qustion regarding is it possibly to do voice priority per flow with ip rtp ?? Thanks in advance olivier Boistel wrote: > > > Wred is a congestion avoidance mechanism. > It drop packed before queue : > the mechanism is : > when a packet arrive, the router calculate the avg > precedence's queue : > >- if avg is less than min the packet is queueed >- if avg is greater than minimum but less than maximum, the > packet > is queued or dropped depending of probability (by exemple > 1/100) >- if avg is greater than maximum the packet is dropped Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=58246&t=58243 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: EIGRP and Secondary IP Address - Strange Behavior! [7:58210]
What do you mean "i can ping myself, the new default gateway and everything else on the lan just fine. the problem is, no other systems can see OR ping my system "? is the system ur saying here is the outside network or within your LAN? Do you use frame-relay in your WAN? If its on the LAN that you have a problem, check your IP addressing scheme. Or maybe revert now to the new scheme. Are you using the same subnet mask on all your computers on the LAN? Problems occur just like that when you have different mask configured on your computers in the LAN. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=58247&t=58210 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OSPF Question... [7:58200]
Jeff, maybe u could configure area 1 as a totally stubby area, that way it would generate a default route pointing to rtrb. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=58248&t=58200 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PIX Book [7:58250]
Hi, Is there any good book and new on PIX firewall -- Eng. Paulo Roque Network Engineer Cisco Certified Network Associate [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=58250&t=58250 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PIX Book [7:58250]
Official course book Cisco Press ISBN 1-58705-035-8 -Original Message- From: Paulo Roque [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 12:47 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: PIX Book [7:58250] Hi, Is there any good book and new on PIX firewall -- Eng. Paulo Roque Network Engineer Cisco Certified Network Associate [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=58251&t=58250 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Strange EIGRP re-distribution behaviour [7:58252]
I am seeing strange eigrp routing behaviour and am not sure why. I have 2 routers. One has a frame relay connection , with about 10 or so sites connected to it. The other router has PRI ISDN, and is the backup for the 10 remote sites. The Frame relay router learns it's routes via EIGRP from the remote sites. The ISDN router has statics, costed at 200, pointing down the dialer interfaces for the remote sites. This works great. The strange behaviour is that over the last couple of weeks, the static route (pointing to the dialer on the ISDN router) has dominated over the EIGRP route, but only for one of the routes. Doing a sh ip eigrp top on the ISDN router shows the route to the affected network as RSTATIC, pointing to the dialer interface. Doing a sh ip eigrp top on the central frame router shows both the frame realy route and the learned route from the ISDN router. The ISDN route however is the one that is in the routing table. The other 9 sites are configured the same on the same two routers, and don't suffer from the same problem. Anyone have any ideas? Symon Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=58252&t=58252 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help!!! about ccbootcamp lab1 [7:58239]
hi, Your routers have inverse-arp activated. They auto-discover aall other router. If you want desactived this feature put th no frame-relay inverse-arp on the frame-relay interface bye Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=58249&t=58239 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PIX Book [7:58250]
The Cisco PIX Firewalls by Richard A. Deal I am reading it, and would recomed it. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=58253&t=58250 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I seems Confused.....Peer-to-to TCP/IP Network [7:58255]
Hi all, Where are mine going wrong? Has anyone implemented a Peer-to-Peer network involving just two computers with ONLY TCP/IP Protocol? I have been trying to do it but keeping failing. NetBEUI is working fine, I can transfer files in between both computers. But TCP/IP protocolis not working across. Am trying to connect a Window NT to Windows 98 Machine. I used the normal cross over cable (1-3, 2-6, 3-1, 6-2) connection. localhost pings alright, IP-address to each machine can be pinged from that very machine only. Hosts file have been edited and it is resolving fine...but I can ping one machine from the other. I have double checked everything but cannot figure out whats happening. I know I have been implementing peer-to-peer networks but I had not gotten into this kind of scenario.. Any forethought would help, thanks Godswill Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=58255&t=58255 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cat 6500 (Redundancy (SRM) vs (Dual MSFC Redundancy) [7:58256]
Dear Cisco Fans and Professionals, I need some friendly advice. There are different opinions about Cat6500(High availibility with Single Router Mode) and (High availibility with Dual MSFC Redundancy) Imagine you had 3 Cat65007s with Dual MSFC1 and Dual Supervisor1A. That is 6 MSFC's and 6 Supervisor engines. You have over 1500 users to support with 30VLANs that need interconnecting routing via EIGRP. Some user applications are sensitive to packet loss. You have to provide minimium downtime in the case of MSFC failer or Supervisor failer. Question 1. Which would you implement (High availibility with Single router mode) or (High availibility with Dual MSFC Redundancy) and why? Question 2. Is was brought to my attention that running dual MSFC redundancy with a high number of VLANS would cause the EIGRP process to run very high. As you know EIGRP is a very noisy protocol. Query storms.. Implementing EIGRP passive interface on all VLAN interfaces except the management VLAN would help the EIGRP process to run low. Are query storms an issue to worry about even after the passive interface is issued on client/user VLANS? Regards, Eric Washington Network Engineer CCNP Thanks in advance for your input Cisco Professionals _ $B%&%$%k%9%a!<%k!"LBOG%a!<%kBP:v$J$i(B MSN Hotmail http://www.hotmail.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=58256&t=58256 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: I seems Confused.....Peer-to-to TCP/IP Network [7:58255]
Check your subnet masks for each computer. Either specify Computer B as the default gateway for Computer A and vice-versa, or don't specify a default gateway at all. After that, you have to configure the lmhosts/hosts files if you want to resolve machine names between each other (quickly). Verify that your cross-over cable is good, or plug each computer into a hub/switch. It's that simple. Cheers! -Mark -Original Message- From: Godswill Oletu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 6:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: I seems Confused.Peer-to-to TCP/IP Network [7:58255] Hi all, Where are mine going wrong? Has anyone implemented a Peer-to-Peer network involving just two computers with ONLY TCP/IP Protocol? I have been trying to do it but keeping failing. NetBEUI is working fine, I can transfer files in between both computers. But TCP/IP protocolis not working across. Am trying to connect a Window NT to Windows 98 Machine. I used the normal cross over cable (1-3, 2-6, 3-1, 6-2) connection. localhost pings alright, IP-address to each machine can be pinged from that very machine only. Hosts file have been edited and it is resolving fine...but I can ping one machine from the other. I have double checked everything but cannot figure out whats happening. I know I have been implementing peer-to-peer networks but I had not gotten into this kind of scenario.. Any forethought would help, thanks Godswill Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=58257&t=58255 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CSS1/CCSP [7:58241]
I havent take the new CSI exam, but for CSS1 i suggest you do the following : MCNS - PIX - VPN - IDS, and if you already pass all of them, i dont think you would have problems with CSI. Ardi Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=58258&t=58241 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CSS1/CCSP [7:58241]
Ardi, I am very appriciated your input. After scanning CiscoPress books, I got the same thinking as your suggestion. And, you made me be more confident now that I am in the right track. Have good Thanksgiving, Tu Do. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=58259&t=58241 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Difference between firewall router and pix firewal [7:58260]
Cisco 827H ADSL router comes with statefull firewall build-in. So can this router totally replace the role of a pix firewall? Because I have a customer who refuse to buy pix firewall because he think that his Cisco 827H router performs firewall function too. How to convince him to purchase pix firewall?? What is stateful firewall? Stateful firewall = packet filtering firewall? Thanks. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=58260&t=58260 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Traffic Analyses [7:58193]
You might also want to check out Ntop: http://www.ntop.org/ntop.html It's not for monitoring Cisco routers, but it will give you everything you want to know about the traffic on your network. HTH, Kent At 04:02 PM 11/27/2002 +, Curious wrote: >Is there a tool which gives me very good traffic analyses or traffic >monitering on my Cisco Routers / PIX FW (Serial and Eth) Interfaces, over >Ethernet and T1 Link. > >Thanks, > > >-- >Curious > >MCSE, CCNP Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=58262&t=58193 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Monitoring Bandwidth on ATM PVP's [7:58263]
I use MRTG for my routers. Is there a similar tool that monitors cells and bandwidth on an ATM Network? Steve Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=58263&t=58263 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PIX Book [7:58250]
Arni, can you contact me off line. I have a non Cisco, non technical question for you. thanks. Chuck -- TANSTAAFL "there ain't no such thing as a free lunch" ""Arni V. Skarphedinsson"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > The Cisco PIX Firewalls by Richard A. Deal > > I am reading it, and would recomed it. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=58264&t=58250 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CSS1/CCSP [7:58241]
Can we still write CSS1 or has it been replaced with the CCSP? Thanks John -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 8:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CSS1/CCSP [7:58241] I havent take the new CSI exam, but for CSS1 i suggest you do the following : MCNS - PIX - VPN - IDS, and if you already pass all of them, i dont think you would have problems with CSI. Ardi Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=58265&t=58241 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: I seems Confused.....Peer-to-to TCP/IP Network [7:58255]
What are the IP/Masks that you are using? Is it just hostnames you can't ping by or the IP's themselves just to be clear. Otherwise the only thing I can think of is that some USB network cards don't like to be peer to peer and only work when connected to a switch/hub. John -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Godswill Oletu Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 7:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: I seems Confused.Peer-to-to TCP/IP Network [7:58255] Hi all, Where are mine going wrong? Has anyone implemented a Peer-to-Peer network involving just two computers with ONLY TCP/IP Protocol? I have been trying to do it but keeping failing. NetBEUI is working fine, I can transfer files in between both computers. But TCP/IP protocolis not working across. Am trying to connect a Window NT to Windows 98 Machine. I used the normal cross over cable (1-3, 2-6, 3-1, 6-2) connection. localhost pings alright, IP-address to each machine can be pinged from that very machine only. Hosts file have been edited and it is resolving fine...but I can ping one machine from the other. I have double checked everything but cannot figure out whats happening. I know I have been implementing peer-to-peer networks but I had not gotten into this kind of scenario.. Any forethought would help, thanks Godswill Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=58266&t=58255 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Difference between firewall router and pix firewal [7:58267]
Halo Link Teo, Stateful Packet Filtering as CIsco PIX Firewall has is filtering method that considers the "state" of the TCP sessions. Also known as Context-Based Access Control (CBAC). The benefit is offer strong security by throughly inspecting data packets and maintaining critical addresses and port numbers in a lookup table. Choose the Cisco IOS Firewall: 1. One-box solution combining powerful security and multiprotocol routing. 2. Scalability to operate in different Cisco IOS environments with various performance requirments. 3. Easy training and maintenance. 4. Extra protection integrated into the network infrastucture. Choose The PIX Fireall when: 1. Device dedicated to security. 2. Very fast encryption and VPN. 3. Authentication and Authorization using RADIUS or TACACS+ 4. THe need of URL filtering Related Article, http://www.mikrodata.co.id/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=125&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0 Best Regards, HATO >From: "Link Teo" >Reply-To: "Link Teo" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Difference between firewall router and pix firewal [7:58260] >Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 01:59:24 GMT > >Cisco 827H ADSL router comes with statefull firewall build-in. So can this >router totally replace the role of a pix firewall? Because I have a >customer >who refuse to buy pix firewall because he think that his Cisco 827H router >performs firewall function too. How to convince him to purchase pix >firewall?? > >What is stateful firewall? Stateful firewall = packet filtering firewall? > >Thanks. _ MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=58267&t=58267 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco Documentation CD [7:58188]
Start with the IOS configuration guides as well as the command references. Knowing most of the commands and syntax will save time come lab day. Jason ""Norman L Hawkins"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Many CCIEs have stated that they read the documentation CD. What does > this mean ? The are many topics and subjects listed. Which topics or > sections are they referring. The documentation is massive. Where is the > starting point ? Any suggestions ? > > Thanks > > > Sign Up for Juno Platinum Internet Access Today > Only $9.95 per month! > Visit www.juno.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=58268&t=58188 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Test for MCast...Any?? [7:58269]
Hello,Is there a way to test/practise MCast configs. on the Internet? I have a cable-modem connected to a 2514 router and would like to configure MCast on it as well as my Lab routers behind that for PIM-SM. I have a laptop connected as a client to one of the routers. How can I verify that MCast is working on the laptop? I mean, is there a freeware/shareware application that I can install on my laptop to test (since I cannot obviously have IP/TV client on my laptop).Or is there any other way to do it in the Lab routers themselves.Any basic configs/examples provided is greatfully appreciated.Thank you for your help.Sincerely,CN MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=58269&t=58269 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Password check error. [7:58270]
Need to erase a read only flash on a 2501 so I can tftp a new IOS image and getting an error Ive never seen, nor can I find refernece to on CCO as of yet. I set config-register to 2101 and reload. get a router(boot)>en password: password check with an invalid encryption type router(boot)> Have to ctrl-br, o/r 2142, reload and reset reg to 2102 to get back to working mode. Router works fine and when up and running in 2102 mode en work as it should as does everything else. Anyone know what this means? Thanks, Keith Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=58270&t=58270 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Password check error. [7:58270]
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Keith Woodworth wrote: |->router(boot)>en |->password: |->password check with an invalid encryption type |->router(boot)> I figured this out...I did not know it at the time but at this prompt the 2501 using 11.2 does not want the enable secret it wanted the enable password, which I had set. Using that I was able to upgrade the router. Thanks, Keith Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=58271&t=58270 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
