Re: Can anyone tell what "ITM" means?! [7:71601]
"Internet traffic management (ITM) solutions like the Platform/Cisco offering, in our judgment are a key part of essentially all Web services," said Peter Christy, principal, Collaborative Research the leading Internet infrastructure industry analysts. "Any information worth making available on the Internet is worth delivering with a high quality of service and high availability. Cisco is the clear market leader in ITM products today. Platform Computing brings a unique competence in the co-ordination of heterogeneous clusters of computers. The partnership is a compelling offering for many of today's sophisticated Web operations." At 03:07 PM 6/29/2003 +, Zsombor Papp wrote: >Don't know what it stands for (probably something about Internet, >Technology, and Multimedia) but found a document that said it was "a thirty >hour multimedia CD-ROM introducing networking technology to the novice and >selling for $50". > >HTH, > >Zsombor > >At 06:35 PM 6/28/2003 +, james kong wrote: > >I have read Routing and Switching Written Exam (350-001)Study Suggestions. > >This item is on the list---"ITM from the Cisco Connection Training CD > >(DOC-CCTCD) Order ITM online".will U tell me the mean of "ITM"?Thank you > >very much!!! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71629&t=71601 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SNMP [7:71625]
Morning all. >>I was wondering if anyone knew of any good freeware and\or sites about SNMP.I know its a noob question but I have never >>had occasion to use it and I want to set it up in my lab and learn more about it. It seems almost everything supports it >>to one degree or another and none of my books get into it so any help is apreciated. What do are you trying to do/learn? These are my old bookmarks when I was really into it (MIBs etc) http://www.wtcs.org/snmp4tpc/default.htm http://silver.he.net/~rrg/snmpworld.htm http://www.simple-times.org/ http://www.winsnmp.com/ http://www.snmplink.org/ HTH Best regards, Dom Stocqueler SysDom Technologies Visit our website - www.sysdom.org Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71630&t=71625 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCNP old patterned extended upto september 7th [7:71628]
Hi Group, I have seen the webside today the old versions that is 640-901,640-605,640-604 are available upto september 7th for registration and 45 days to complete after the registration. and there is no end date to the 640-841.How far is true.Can anybody from cisco answers this .I will be very helpful to those who have any info and update me... pls mail me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] regards Khaleel Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71628&t=71628 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 640-100 study material [7:71622]
John, I think you would be better advised to prepare for the new SECUR exam, 642-501. Granted, finding study material for the new exam will not be easy, but the old exam is retiring in 3 months (though if you pass it and then pass the other four new exams, you will have a CCSP). The old exam is really poorly written, some of the questions are focused on a way of doing things that is now Overcome By Events (OBE--a favorite acronym in the military), and there was very little in the way of complementarity to the SAFE architecture, which is Cisco's apparent focus on securing networks. I just sat the new CSI exam, 642-541, and the exam questions are much better written, plus the router simulation is much more relevant and even quasi-realisitic. The SAFE exam does follow the outline here but you also need to know the content of the SAFE implementation thoroughly, to include "how and why" as well as "what" on the parts. You also must know how to configure the components, at least on a broad level, and how they operate and are managed. In terms of finding material for the new SECUR exam, I suggest starting with the exam description, and apply the same learn-it-in-depth appraoch I described above. You are more likely to be tested on relevant material than irrelevant. HTH Annlee John Holp wrote: > Hopefully I am not asking for something not permitted here. > > I am studying for the Cisco 640-100 Managing Cisco Network Security (MCNS) > exam but am finding not too much good study material. > > Specifically I need practice material for the configuration scenarios one is > apt to see on the exam. > > Any and all sources that you know to be pertinent would be appreciated. > > > Thanks, > > John Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71627&t=71622 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can anyone tell what "ITM" means?! [7:71601]
Don't know what it stands for (probably something about Internet, Technology, and Multimedia) but found a document that said it was "a thirty hour multimedia CD-ROM introducing networking technology to the novice and selling for $50". HTH, Zsombor At 06:35 PM 6/28/2003 +, james kong wrote: >I have read Routing and Switching Written Exam (350-001)Study Suggestions. >This item is on the list---"ITM from the Cisco Connection Training CD >(DOC-CCTCD) Order ITM online".will U tell me the mean of "ITM"?Thank you >very much!!! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71624&t=71601 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SNMP [7:71625]
Morning all. I was wondering if anyone knew of any good freeware and\or sites about SNMP.I know its a noob question but I have never had occasion to use it and I want to set it up in my lab and learn more about it. It seems almost everything supports it to one degree or another and none of my books get into it so any help is apreciated. TIA Don K. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71625&t=71625 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Computer receiving packets which are connected to [7:71600]
What is the switch port set to on the Cisco switch? -Auto negotiation? -Portfast - Spanning tree? -Is there any CRC's or runts on the switch port when the XP hosts are connected? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71623&t=71600 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
640-100 study material [7:71622]
Hopefully I am not asking for something not permitted here. I am studying for the Cisco 640-100 Managing Cisco Network Security (MCNS) exam but am finding not too much good study material. Specifically I need practice material for the configuration scenarios one is apt to see on the exam. Any and all sources that you know to be pertinent would be appreciated. Thanks, John Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71622&t=71622 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DLCI Prioritization [7:71428]
I wonder whether you have only one PVC between two points If I am right, the priority is set by provider that FR-Net will delever your data with priority according to DLCI number, which was set and assign to you. The primary DLCI is a actual DLCI assign to your PVC and the others are only use for FR-Switch to determine that which one (data) will be higher priority so that it could be delevered even if network congestion. So, you have to config your DLCIs exactly as the provider told you and the primary DLCI is nedded for your PVC, it down mean your PVC down or in other word, you loss all your traffic. MNThanh Support Division Vietnam Datacommunication Company (VDC) ericbrouwers wrote: >Srivathsan, > >I think you're right. Is also suggested by this note in >http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/125/12.html#topic8. >"Note: Make sure you configure the DLCIs to correspond with the priority >list, or the system will not use the correct queue." > >The primary DLCI is linked to the subinterface. The secondary DLCIs are also >implicit linked to this subinterface in the example below. > >interface Serial0.1 point-to-point > ip address 4.0.1.1 255.255.255.0 > frame-relay priority-dlci-group 1 140 180 190 200 > frame-relay interface-dlci 140 > >So if you lose your primary DLCI (your subinterface), you also lose all >other traffic on the secondary DLCIs. > >Eric > > >- Original Message - >From: "Srivathsan Ananthachari" >To: "ericbrouwers" >Cc: >Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 1:14 PM >Subject: RE: DLCI Prioritization [7:71428] > > >Does that mean that if I want my primary DLCI ( for whatever reasons ) >to belong to some other priority queue other priority than high ..then >it's not possible . This is coz it's the first dlci mentioned in the >frame-relay priority-dlci-group command ( in the interface / >subinterface configuration mode )that's always the primary . > >I quote the following from the cisco site.. >" >Implementation Considerations > >When implementing DLCI prioritization, please note the following points: > > >If a secondary DLCI goes down, you lose traffic destined for that queue >only. > >If you lose the primary DLCI, the subinterface goes down and you lose >all traffic. > >" > >What does the second point mean...?? > >Thanks >Srivathsan > >-Original Message- >From: ericbrouwers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 4:36 PM >To: Srivathsan Ananthachari >Subject: Re: DLCI Prioritization [7:71428] > > >Primary DLCI is the first DLCI in the command: > >frame-relay priority-dlci-group group-number high-dlci medium-dlci >normal-dlci low-dlci > >This command is applied at the interface or subinterface level. >Restriction: this command should not be used on a main interface or >point-to-point subinterface, where only a single DLCI is configured. > >Here's an example at interface level, from doc. CD: >http://127.0.0.1:8080/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fwan_r/f >rcmd >s/wrffr3.htm#xtocid16 > >interface serial 1 > ip address 172.21.177.1 255.255.255.0 > encapsulation frame-relay > frame-relay priority-dlci-group 1 40 50 > frame-relay map ip 172.21.177.2 40 broadcast > >Check this link for an example at subinterface level: > >http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/125/12.html#topic8 > >In this sample config ICMP traffic is assigned to the highest DLCI: > >interface Serial0 > no ip address > encapsulation frame-relay > priority-group 1 >! >interface Serial0.1 point-to-point > ip address 4.0.1.1 255.255.255.0 > frame-relay priority-dlci-group 1 140 180 190 200 > frame-relay interface-dlci 140 >! >access-list 102 permit icmp any any > priority-list 1 protocol ip high list 102 > priority-list 1 protocol ip medium tcp telnet > priority-list 1 protocol ip normal tcp ftp > priority-list 1 protocol ip low > >I'm not familiar with it, just copied it from the URLs, > >Eric Brouwers > > >- Original Message - >From: "Srivathsan Ananthachari" >To: >Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 11:10 AM >Subject: DLCI Prioritization [7:71428] > > > > >>In DLCI Prioritization , what's a primary DLCI , is it the dlci >>specified in the >> >>frame-relay interface dlci command >> >>( is it XX ) ?? >> >>Can you create priority-dlci-group in a physical interface ( major >>interface like serial 0 for eg., I understand it can be done in a >>sub-interface )..?? >> >>/Srivathsan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71620&t=71428 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IBM 5494 With Router [7:71618]
Dear sir I'd Like To Know what Type Of Cable I Can Use It to Connect Serial In Router Cisco 2600 With Control Unit 5494 I used V.24 Male cable From 5494 And Connect It With V.24 Cable Female with Cisco Cable. But When I Make show Interface The SDLC Address State Is Disconnect It Meanes No Communcation between serial and IBM Control Unit 5494. I Think I Have Problem In Pin Assiment Between The Two Cable . And I want to Inform you I didn't Make Interface Loopback It Is Important To Do It In this Case Or Not . Please I Need Help As Soon As Possible Thank's ELHAMY KAMAL Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71618&t=71618 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Multipoint cost [7:71619]
How can the router calculate the OSPF cost for multipoint interface --- Cost 100 Cost 390 I R1 I--I R2 I I I Bandwidth 1024Bandwidth 256 II --- Multipoint Int'f Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71619&t=71619 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCNP Study Materials [7:71616]
I think the books of ciscopress are very very good! Such as > (Teara, Paquette, Cisco Press) > (Webb, Cisco Press) > (Paquet, Cisco Press) > (Chappell, Farkas, Cisco Press). And this four books are basic and important!Then U can read the other four books of sybex.U also can find the better exam guide which name is "testking". I think the eight books of ciscopress are enough,U should make clearly of them! Alan Ho wrote: > > Hi Members, > > Appreciate if you could let me know 1-2 good books for the > preparation of > CCNP router and switching exam. > > Thanks > > Alan > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71621&t=71616 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco frame-relay question [7:71500]
I think frame-relay local-dlci is used for specifying which PVC should be used on a interface, or in other word tie a interface to a PVC, especially when using sub-interface. When using physical interface, you may use frame-relay map command or inverse-arp in case you have only one PVC for that interface MNThC nh Support Division Vietnam Datacommunication Company (VDC) Wilmes, Rusty wrote: >It looks like it's used when LMI isn't available > >http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps5187/products_command_refe >rence_chapter09186a008017cf53.html#1059567 > >Note The frame-relay local-dlci command is provided mainly to allow >testing of the Frame Relay encapsulation in a setting where two servers are >connected back-to-back. This command is not required in a live Frame Relay >network. > > >-Original Message- >From: Paresh Khatri >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: 6/26/2003 8:26 PM >Subject: Cisco frame-relay question [7:71500] > >Hi all, > >What is the cisco "frame-relay local-dlci" command used for ? > >Thanks in advance, >Paresh. -- MNThanh Support Division, VDC1 292 Tay Son, Hanoi, Vietnam Telephone: +84-4-5374165 Fax: +84-4-5372781 Handphone: +84-91-3213801 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71617&t=71500 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DLCI Prioritization [7:71428]
Srivathsan, I think you're right. Is also suggested by this note in http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/125/12.html#topic8. "Note: Make sure you configure the DLCIs to correspond with the priority list, or the system will not use the correct queue." The primary DLCI is linked to the subinterface. The secondary DLCIs are also implicit linked to this subinterface in the example below. interface Serial0.1 point-to-point ip address 4.0.1.1 255.255.255.0 frame-relay priority-dlci-group 1 140 180 190 200 frame-relay interface-dlci 140 So if you lose your primary DLCI (your subinterface), you also lose all other traffic on the secondary DLCIs. Eric - Original Message - From: "Srivathsan Ananthachari" To: "ericbrouwers" Cc: Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 1:14 PM Subject: RE: DLCI Prioritization [7:71428] Does that mean that if I want my primary DLCI ( for whatever reasons ) to belong to some other priority queue other priority than high ..then it's not possible . This is coz it's the first dlci mentioned in the frame-relay priority-dlci-group command ( in the interface / subinterface configuration mode )that's always the primary . I quote the following from the cisco site.. " Implementation Considerations When implementing DLCI prioritization, please note the following points: If a secondary DLCI goes down, you lose traffic destined for that queue only. If you lose the primary DLCI, the subinterface goes down and you lose all traffic. " What does the second point mean...?? Thanks Srivathsan -Original Message- From: ericbrouwers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 4:36 PM To: Srivathsan Ananthachari Subject: Re: DLCI Prioritization [7:71428] Primary DLCI is the first DLCI in the command: frame-relay priority-dlci-group group-number high-dlci medium-dlci normal-dlci low-dlci This command is applied at the interface or subinterface level. Restriction: this command should not be used on a main interface or point-to-point subinterface, where only a single DLCI is configured. Here's an example at interface level, from doc. CD: http://127.0.0.1:8080/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fwan_r/f rcmd s/wrffr3.htm#xtocid16 interface serial 1 ip address 172.21.177.1 255.255.255.0 encapsulation frame-relay frame-relay priority-dlci-group 1 40 50 frame-relay map ip 172.21.177.2 40 broadcast Check this link for an example at subinterface level: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/125/12.html#topic8 In this sample config ICMP traffic is assigned to the highest DLCI: interface Serial0 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay priority-group 1 ! interface Serial0.1 point-to-point ip address 4.0.1.1 255.255.255.0 frame-relay priority-dlci-group 1 140 180 190 200 frame-relay interface-dlci 140 ! access-list 102 permit icmp any any priority-list 1 protocol ip high list 102 priority-list 1 protocol ip medium tcp telnet priority-list 1 protocol ip normal tcp ftp priority-list 1 protocol ip low I'm not familiar with it, just copied it from the URLs, Eric Brouwers - Original Message - From: "Srivathsan Ananthachari" To: Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 11:10 AM Subject: DLCI Prioritization [7:71428] > In DLCI Prioritization , what's a primary DLCI , is it the dlci > specified in the > > frame-relay interface dlci command > > ( is it XX ) ?? > > Can you create priority-dlci-group in a physical interface ( major > interface like serial 0 for eg., I understand it can be done in a > sub-interface )..?? > > /Srivathsan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71615&t=71428 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCNA Exam ??? [7:71614]
Hi All, Is it right that CCNA 640-607 exam will be expire soon(on Sep.) ? if yes give more info. about the new exam and the changes... Regards Reza Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71614&t=71614 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Would these two configs have the same result? [7:66462]
I don't see the need for either the distribute-list or the route-map since you are not otherwise placing routes into BGP either way can't hurt, I guess. ""Brian Carroll"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > S! ALL! > > The desired result is to allow only the default route to be sent to a > neighbor in AS2. > > First way I did it: > > router bgp 1 > nei 192.168.100.10 remote-as 2 > nei 192.168.100.10 default-originate > nei 192.168.100.10 distribute-list 1 out > > access-list 1 permit 0.0.0.0 > access-list 1 deny any > > > Second Way: Note that AS1 is a transit AS that has NO network statements. > Therefore the only update with a path of ^$ would be the path created by the > "nei 192.168.100.2 default-originate" statement. > > router bgp 1 > nei 192.168.100.2 remote-as 2 > nei 192.168.100.2 default-originate > nei 192.168.100.2 route-map default-only out > > ip as-path access-list 1 permit ^$ > > route-map default-only permit 10 > match as-path 1 > > I do see that the first way would be less prone (actaully..fault proof ) to > errors going forward, i.e. were AS1 to originate another network it would > match as-path list 1. Still, for the situation as stated, either of these > ways of doing it meets the desired result, yes? > > Thanks! > > Brian Carroll > CCNP, CCSE, MCSE, CCA > Director of Professional Services > Air Net Link LLC. > > > --- > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.408 / Virus Database: 233 - Release Date: 11/8/02 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71612&t=66462 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Would these two configs have the same result? [7:66462]
ignore my previous post. been a lab rat for too long. ""Brian Carroll"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > S! ALL! > > The desired result is to allow only the default route to be sent to a > neighbor in AS2. > > First way I did it: > > router bgp 1 > nei 192.168.100.10 remote-as 2 > nei 192.168.100.10 default-originate > nei 192.168.100.10 distribute-list 1 out > > access-list 1 permit 0.0.0.0 > access-list 1 deny any > > > Second Way: Note that AS1 is a transit AS that has NO network statements. > Therefore the only update with a path of ^$ would be the path created by the > "nei 192.168.100.2 default-originate" statement. > > router bgp 1 > nei 192.168.100.2 remote-as 2 > nei 192.168.100.2 default-originate > nei 192.168.100.2 route-map default-only out > > ip as-path access-list 1 permit ^$ > > route-map default-only permit 10 > match as-path 1 > > I do see that the first way would be less prone (actaully..fault proof ) to > errors going forward, i.e. were AS1 to originate another network it would > match as-path list 1. Still, for the situation as stated, either of these > ways of doing it meets the desired result, yes? > > Thanks! > > Brian Carroll > CCNP, CCSE, MCSE, CCA > Director of Professional Services > Air Net Link LLC. > > > --- > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.408 / Virus Database: 233 - Release Date: 11/8/02 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71613&t=66462 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
