Re: Problem [7:71890]
Hi, first you need to enable "ip routing" to make it work. Then your default route should look like this: "ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx" where is xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx is the other router interface. Note: after the destination network follows a subnet mask (not a wildcard mask). Make sure you have a route in your other back to this router (Entires in the routing table are oneway only). Try "show ip route" to verify. With kind regards Jens Neelsen --- Projet AIM wrote: > Hi again > I am pretty much thanksfull for your explanantion > I have tried what you have suggested and still it doesn't work > The thing is I am convainced that I am missing something but > can't find out > what > Thanx again and any help is appreciated > Elias > > > >From: "Jans van Deventer" > >Reply-To: "Jans van Deventer" > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Re: Problem [7:71890] > >Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2003 14:25:41 GMT > > > >Hi > > > >What you did when you typed "no ip routing" was to > effectively change > >your router into an IP host. You must enable ip routing with > "ip > >routing" and then add your static route. Test again and come > back for > >help if it doensn't work. > > > >One advantage of disabling IP routing and effectively turning > your > >router into a host is because you can then use all the nice > debug > >functionalities like debug ip packet, as though your router > was a host. > > > >Regards, > >Jans > > > >Projet AIM wrote: > > > > >Hi all > > >I have a cisco 3600 and I am facing an unknown problem > maybe it is > >stupuid > > >but realy i don't know > > >I have a pretty much common configuration 2 valid IP > addresses on both > > >interfaces. one of them are my network the other interface > is linked to > > >another router interface when I trie to ping the outside > from the > >router's > > >consol I have a response but when I try to ping from a > machine in my > >network > > >and don't have any reply. > > >I used static route as in > > >"ip route 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx" where > is > >xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx > > > is the other router interface > > >I disabled ip routing > > >"no ip routing" > > >Can Anyone please help me if a missed anything > > >THANX a lot > > >Elias > > > > > > >_ > > >Trouvez l'bme soeur sur MSN Rencontres ! > http://g.msn.fr/FR1000/9551 > _ > Dicouvrez les nouvelles imotictnes animies de > http://g.msn.fr/FR1001/866 > MSN Messenger nouvelle formule [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71942&t=71890 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE Lab !!! [7:71919]
At 08:51 AM 7/5/2003 +, H T wrote: >Hi, >Actually Cisco just says the following topics are removed, but there is not >details > >http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/certifications/routing.html > >ISO CLNS... does it include ISIS ??? ISIS routing IP is still a valid topic. >Token Ring and Token Ring Switching... does it includes all IBM >networking??? no clue here and haven't looked into this in years. much like yourself it seems :) >1. SRB >2. SR/TLB >3. RSRB >4. DLSw and DLSw+ >5. Encapsulation bridging >6. CRB >7. IRB > >How about ATM, what will be included? > > >Can any one fine out > > > >Cheers, >Heiman. > > > >""Hemingway"" wrote in message >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > anyone who is serious about CCIE lab prep should become familiar with this > > site: > > > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ > > > > start your reading here. everything yoiu need to know can be found >somewhere > > within the links provided. > > > > > > ""H T"" wrote in message > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Hi all, > > > Can any one help us about the lab topics? > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Heiman. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71941&t=71919 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCIE's or to be in new york city? [7:71940]
Hey All, Currently studying for the CCIE written exam and looking to know if anybody else is studying for it as well around the Westchester or NYC area. It would be nice to gather together and create a studygroup around this area. I have 7 routers at my own place that I play around with. E-mail me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you're interested. Thanks for your time. Sincerely, Dae Il Kim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71940&t=71940 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco Training [7:71811]
I can see that point of view too, although it's an expensive 12 days, it may be the only way if you're that busy. When my employer needed CCNP a few years ago, I negotiated study leave rather than going on the courses, so I could sit at home with the books and a bunch of routers. They save a couple of grand per week. I think it depends on what level you're at. If you've done a fair bit of hands on anyway, then the courses can waste a lot of time going over old ground. I prefer the book and a bit of peace and quiet with the mobile phone turned off. Luckily my insomnia gives me a few hours after my family go to bed. If your family are still at home during the day, study leave may not be a good thing. You could always leave the book in the bathroom and do it bit by bit. Careful if you read for too long though you can lose the use of your legs completely :-) Horses for courses I suppose. Good Luck anyway Bikespace ""Amazing"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > if you use the bootcamp training with one thing in mind -- passing the > tests -- not learning, then you will get your money's worth. people > criticize this type of training but for me it was a way to take 12 days away > from all other distractions, study and pass the four exams. no i am not a > "paper" cert, and had five years hands-on job experience prior to trying to > pass any tests. i also just passed the CCNP-Recert test last week. > > i used ccprep and it was worth every penny (http://www.ccprep.com) > > > ""John Brandis"" wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Hi, > > > > Any one ever been to one of these 5 day training places for various CCNP > > exams ? Are they any good, or am I just better of reading the book again > and > > working on the labs with my own gear (yes I have quite a few routers here, > > but never the time) > > > > I am on my quest for CCNP then on to CCIE, however between work and being > a > > dad, I just never get the time any more > > > > Thanks for your feedback > > > > > > ** > > > > This email message (and attachments) may contain information that is > > confidential to Solution 6. If you are not the intended recipient you > cannot > > use, distribute or copy the message or attachments. In such a case, > please > > notify the sender by return email immediately and erase all copies of the > > message and attachments. Opinions, conclusions and other information in > > this message and attachments that do not relate to the official business > of > > Solution 6 are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > > > * Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71936&t=71811 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ATM Bandwith [7:71937]
-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gerard Torin >Sent: 05 July 2003 19:06 >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: ATM Bandwith [7:71937] >Hi guys, >Anybody know how is built the ATM4S Bandwith?. For example, In ATM`s link of 34Mbps, Is true that 4Mbps is just only >header?, I ask that, because actually my company has it. But we don4t reach the maximun bandwith of 34Mbps. Yesterday, we >did stress test in the link and just only reach 30Mbps. >I thanks any comment. Please supply more details. How did you test and with what size packets? Cell tax (the overhead of breaking your data down in 53byte chunks) might account for hat you are observing. Best regards, Dom Stocqueler SysDom Technologies Visit our website - www.sysdom.org Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71939&t=71937 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BSMSN 1.1 Vs 2.0 [7:71932]
David, No, the course has completely changed. The switches are different--3550s and 2950s. Most of the content is different, including topics like new enhanced STP features, CEF, VRRP, queuing and prioritization, metro and optical, and many other topics. I'd definitely take the newer version since, in the 1.1 course, you'll probably get a 5500 with an RSM to to multilayer switching and this is an EOLed product; plus the 1.1 class covers the CatOS--the 2.0 covers the IOS, which is the direction Cisco is pushing. Cheers! -- Richard A. Deal Visit my home page at http://home.cfl.rr.com/dealgroup/ Author of Cisco PIX Firewalls, CCNA Secrets Revealed!, CCNP Remote Access Exam Prep, CCNP Switching Exam Cram, and CCNP Cisco LAN Switch Configuration Exam Cram Cisco Test Prep author for QuizWare, providing the most comprehensive Cisco exams on the market. ""David Vital"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > My company is sending me to the BCMSN class next week. I'm grateful for > that, but I had called the training company last month when registering to > make sure it was the new class. Just checked the Cisco website for a look > and the link showed the class I'm taking as 1.1 not the new 2.0 . From > what I can gather, the main difference is AVVID. I guess it's too late now > to make a change in plans. does anyone know what else I will be missing > compared to the newer class? > > David Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71938&t=71932 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ATM Bandwith [7:71937]
Hi guys, Anybody know how is built the ATM4S Bandwith?. For example, In ATM`s link of 34Mbps, Is true that 4Mbps is just only header?, I ask that, because actually my company has it. But we don4t reach the maximun bandwith of 34Mbps. Yesterday, we did stress test in the link and just only reach 30Mbps. I thanks any comment. - Yahoo! Messenger Nueva versión: Super Webcam, voz, caritas animadas, y más #161;Gratis! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71937&t=71937 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE Lab !!! [7:71919]
Hi, Actually Cisco just says the following topics are removed, but there is not details http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/certifications/routing.html ISO CLNS... does it include ISIS ??? Token Ring and Token Ring Switching... does it includes all IBM networking??? 1. SRB 2. SR/TLB 3. RSRB 4. DLSw and DLSw+ 5. Encapsulation bridging 6. CRB 7. IRB How about ATM, what will be included? Can any one fine out Cheers, Heiman. ""Hemingway"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > anyone who is serious about CCIE lab prep should become familiar with this > site: > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ > > start your reading here. everything yoiu need to know can be found somewhere > within the links provided. > > > ""H T"" wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Hi all, > > Can any one help us about the lab topics? > > > > > > Cheers, > > Heiman. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71934&t=71919 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE Lab !!! [7:71919]
you are responsible for anything that can be done with the particular IOS on the particular equipment. with the exception of those things which specifically are not covered. you really need to dig deeper on the CCIE site. it's all there. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/exam_preparation/preparation.html practice labs abound. a simple google search for "CCIE practice lab" will result in quite a few hits. best wishes. ""H T"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Hi, > Actually Cisco just says the following topics are removed, but there is not > details > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/certifications/routing.html > > ISO CLNS... does it include ISIS ??? > > Token Ring and Token Ring Switching... does it includes all IBM > networking??? > 1. SRB > 2. SR/TLB > 3. RSRB > 4. DLSw and DLSw+ > 5. Encapsulation bridging > 6. CRB > 7. IRB > > How about ATM, what will be included? > > > Can any one fine out > > > > Cheers, > Heiman. > > > > ""Hemingway"" wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > anyone who is serious about CCIE lab prep should become familiar with this > > site: > > > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ > > > > start your reading here. everything yoiu need to know can be found > somewhere > > within the links provided. > > > > > > ""H T"" wrote in message > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Hi all, > > > Can any one help us about the lab topics? > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Heiman. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71935&t=71919 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OSPF V-Link [7:71926]
192.168.11.9 is the address of the R2 interface pointing at R3. They are all serial interfaces. All of the Lo addresses (RIDs) are advertised in ospf. I swear I don't know what happened. I just this minute reinstituted the configuration that failed me all afternoon. It just spat out the error message above about ten times in a minute and stopped. Now everything seems to work fine. I have routes where they should be. I know I rebooted all of the routers twice this afternoon to try to make sure that it wasn't a hiccup. I even reconfigured a 4000M to replace the mc3810 at R2 - no avail. When you said to check the "show" outputs, I thought I'd go check it one more time to see if there was anything I hadn't noticed earlier and everything worked. Frustrating sometimes. At least it's not MS. Thanks for writing. Sometimes I think the boxes just need more attention than my cussin' at 'em. You gave it. Leaves me feeling like a right eejit, but it's working now. That's what's required. Nelson Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71933&t=71926 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
