RE: route redistribution [7:74856]
That description on page 698 sounds like as if there was a thing called router between EIGRP and OSPF. In reality, the redistribution is handled by the (code that belongs to the) receiving protocol. Thanks, Zsombor John Jones wrote: I am studying for CCIE Written and lately have been concentrating on redistribution. I have come across two statements in Doyle's V.1 that I am a bit confused about. On page 698 under the Metric section, he states that a cost must be assigned to each EIGRP route **BEFORE** passing it into OSPF and vice versa. What confuses me is that on page 712 under Configuring Redistribution it states under #1 that the redistribution configuration command and information is placed on the protocol that is to **RECEIVE** the distibuted routes, which I assume will be applied **AFTER** the route has been received. This seems to contradict to me. Could anyone shed some light on this? It would help my understanding... Thanks. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74863t=74856 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: Stuck on Subinterfaces - HELP! [7:74854]
Not necessarily...you can also use point-point frame With sub-interfaces... Larry Letterman Cisco Systems -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Raj Singh Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 9:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Stuck on Subinterfaces - HELP! [7:74854] Use the frame relay for subinterfaces. You use subinterfaces to connect multiple frame relay location to the hub. Raj **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74866t=74854 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: backup interface [7:74836]
Hi, even when i shut down my serial interface nothing happens. Bri 0/0 stays in standby mode. and sub interfaces in administratively down. one thing to keep in minds that i am using a simmultor. it is not real isdn. show isdn status shows layer 1 deactivated. Thanks kaiser A Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74867t=74836 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: IP expert's RS workbook [7:74849]
Nope. Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Raj Singh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: vrijdag 5 september 2003 4:19 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: IP expert's RS workbook [7:74849] Anyone willing to share there IP experts RS workbook or pitch in to get it together? Raj **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74869t=74849 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: Stuck on Subinterfaces - HELP! [7:74854]
Hi Rich, The moment you configure a subint on an int, the int does not sense anything layer 3. when your csu or in your case the routers are connected together the int will show up-up.For the subint to sh up-up your layer must be ok, therefore your ip address must be properly configured. You therefore need to check your ip addressing on the subints and ensure that they are in the same subnet(same subnet mask). Rgds, AK Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74870t=74854 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: backup interface [7:74836]
Kaiser, Shutting the local primary interface down will not trigger the backup interface. The line protocol of the primary interface must go down in order to bring the backup interface out of standby. Try shutting down the link from the other side, or just unplug the serial interface. HTH, Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internetwork Expert, Inc. http://www.InternetworkExpert.com Toll Free: 877-334-8987 Direct: 708-362-1418 (Outside the US and Canada) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 1:01 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: backup interface [7:74836] Hi, even when i shut down my serial interface nothing happens. Bri 0/0 stays in standby mode. and sub interfaces in administratively down. one thing to keep in minds that i am using a simmultor. it is not real isdn. show isdn status shows layer 1 deactivated. Thanks kaiser A **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74872t=74836 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
OT: Friday Funnies [7:74878]
The Ultimate Chicken Joke A chicken and an egg are lying in bed. The chicken is leaning against the headboard smoking a cigarette with a satisfied smile on its face. The egg, looking a bit upset, grabs the sheet and rolls over and says, Well, I guess we finally know the answer to THAT question! Best regards, Dom Stocqueler SysDom Technologies Visit our website - www.sysdom.org Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74878t=74878 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
DR Solution [7:74875]
Hi, I was jsut looking at various options for having link redundancy adn site redundancy. Just wanted to know the various solutions can be deployed for such a kindof requirement? -- ||--Router C ( Site B,DR Site which is |ISP |in Standby , should -site A fails) || || || || ----- Router ARouter B (Site A where A adn B are in VRRP) 1. Active servers behind Router A 2. Router B would kick-in if Router A fails. 3. Incase the site A fails,the traffic should be automatically diverted to Router C (Site B). 4. Site A will be replicated to Site B using a link between Site A and B. 5. Site A and site B has two different IP addressing schemes. 6. Instead of a single ISP, what would be the solution if Router C was conencted to a diffrent ISP? The users (outside to Site A and B) will be accessing site A purely using IP addresses (no DNS). what would be the solution at ISP level to acheive the above reqmt? If the applications were accessed using names GSLB would ahve been the solution. Thanks LP. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74875t=74875 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
HSRP [7:74879]
Dear all, I am slightly confused about the config of HSRP. More specifically it is the client default gateway that is confusing me. I have the following config for redundant Ethernet on Routers 1 / 2: interface FastEthernet0/1 ip address 10.254.0.1 255.255.255.0 duplex auto speed auto standby timers 3 6 standby 1 ip 10.254.0.103 standby 1 priority 255 standby 1 preempt standby 1 authentication interface FastEthernet0/1 ip address 10.254.0.2 2255.255.0 duplex auto speed auto standby timers 3 6 standby 1 ip 10.254.0.103 standbriority 200 standby 1 preempt standby 1 authentication In the case above, is the client gateway going to be 10.254.0.1 (IP Address of the Active router), which we are currently using, or is it 10.254.0.103 (HSRP IP Address)... Any help is appreciated, Sincerely, Derek Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74879t=74879 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: SNMP on a Dialer interface [7:74722]
not dumb, but it appears to be working now - both dialer and async lines are showing traffic. I've made no changes (have been off yesterday), and no-one else (yet) knows the passwords to these systems. Strange. Thanks anyway. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 05 September 2003 11:31 To: Hanna, Keith; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: SNMP on a Dialer interface [7:74722] Maybe dumb, but what about the fixed layer 3 int? Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Hanna, Keith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: woensdag 3 september 2003 18:53 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: SNMP on a Dialer interface [7:74722] Hi, I'm running MRTG to provide bandwidth usage info on various routers/switches etc, and it working well except it doesn't provide information on 'dialer' interfaces. We have one router with numerous dialer ints for ISDN and another providing modem dialup - is there anyway to monitor these connections for bandwidth? Virtual-Access ports are created and monitored, but it's not obvious which virtual int ties up with which dialer (and as virtual's come go, they will change) Any suggestions? Thanks Keith **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74883t=74722 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: HSRP [7:74879]
The default gateway of the client should be 10.254.0.103. DW b6l%s news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] $$ Dear all, I am slightly confused about the config of HSRP. More specifically it is the client default gateway that is confusing me. I have the following config for redundant Ethernet on Routers 1 / 2: interface FastEthernet0/1 ip address 10.254.0.1 255.255.255.0 duplex auto speed auto standby timers 3 6 standby 1 ip 10.254.0.103 standby 1 priority 255 standby 1 preempt standby 1 authentication interface FastEthernet0/1 ip address 10.254.0.2 2255.255.0 duplex auto speed auto standby timers 3 6 standby 1 ip 10.254.0.103 standbriority 200 standby 1 preempt standby 1 authentication In the case above, is the client gateway going to be 10.254.0.1 (IP Address of the Active router), which we are currently using, or is it 10.254.0.103 (HSRP IP Address)... Any help is appreciated, Sincerely, Derek **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74885t=74879 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: SNMP on a Dialer interface [7:74722]
Maybe dumb, but what about the fixed layer 3 int? Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Hanna, Keith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: woensdag 3 september 2003 18:53 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: SNMP on a Dialer interface [7:74722] Hi, I'm running MRTG to provide bandwidth usage info on various routers/switches etc, and it working well except it doesn't provide information on 'dialer' interfaces. We have one router with numerous dialer ints for ISDN and another providing modem dialup - is there anyway to monitor these connections for bandwidth? Virtual-Access ports are created and monitored, but it's not obvious which virtual int ties up with which dialer (and as virtual's come go, they will change) Any suggestions? Thanks Keith **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74882t=74722 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re:Information Systems Security (INFOSEC) Professi [7:73514]
I received a letter from Cisco to say that I was certified as an Information Systems Security (INFOSEC) Professional. The certification is now also included on the Cisco cert tracking system (www.certmanager.net/cisco). Essentially all it is: Some Ciscos CCSP exams as being of a standard that the National Security Agency (NSA) Committee on National Security Systems (CNSS) now recognize. Let me know if you need more info, or check out: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/whats_new/infosec/ Cheers Brett Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74884t=73514 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: HSRP [7:74879]
In the case above, is the client gateway going to be 10.254.0.1 (IP Address of the Active router), which we are currently using, or is it 10.254.0.103 (HSRP IP Address)... If clients set default gateway to 10.254.0.1, when that router fails, HSRP won't be of any use. On the other hand, if they set their default gateway to 10.254.0.103, if any of the two routers is active, they will still be able to talk to the outside world. Marko. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74887t=74879 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
DNS Problem [7:74890]
Guys, I am having problem resolving DNS names. I have a Cisco 2600 and configured for right name-servers and domain name, but I am still unable to ping www.yahoo.com from my router and a unix box. My router/unix is behind a PIX firewall. I also created an ACL to allow outbound conections to my internal Unix/Router. Following is my pix ACL. I am wondering if somehow my firewall is not allowing DNS resolution. I can ping outside fine. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Regards!! access-list outside_in permit tcp any host 204.1.2.2 eq telnet access-list outside_in permit icmp any any access-list outside_in permit tcp any host 204.1.2.2 eq ftp access-list outside_in permit tcp any host 204.1.2.2 eq www access-list outside_in permit tcp any host 204.1.2.2 eq domain access-list outside_in permit udp any host 204.1.2.2 eq domain access-group outside_in in interface outside global (outside) 1 204.1.2.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 nat (inside) 1 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 0 0 static (inside,outside) 204.1.2.2 10.1.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0 (Unix Box ) static (inside,outside) 204.1.2.3 10.1.1.6 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0 (Router) = These are the logs from my PIX firewall.. (tried nslookup from unix box) 302015: Built outbound UDP connection 23742 for outside:129.250.35.251/53 (129.250.35.251/53) to inside:10.1.1.1/10166 (204.1.159.205/10166) 302015: Built outbound UDP connection 23743 for outside:129.250.35.250/53 (129.250.35.250/53) to inside:10.1.1.1/10166 (204.1.159.205/10166) 302016: Teardown UDP connection 23740 for outside:129.250.35.251/53 to inside:10.1.1.1/40069 duration 0:02:41 bytes 188 302016: Teardown UDP connection 23741 for outside:129.250.35.250/53 to inside:10.1.1.1/40069 duration 0:02:56 bytes 188 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74890t=74890 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
the 642 exams and CCNA re-cert [7:74892]
From what I have read, any exam with a 642 prefix renews your CCNA.Can anyone validate that? Regards, Ajay Chenampara Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74892t=74892 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
9E0-541 (RSS) [7:74893]
Hi. Can anyone help me with any stuff that could help me to pass this exam. My E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I would be very gratefull. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74893t=74893 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
506 Flash Damaged [7:74895]
Hi, I have a 506 with damaged flash. Is there any way I can boot from TFTP, or any other solution ??? I have looked at Cisco site and my books but cannot find a solution. Otherwise I guess its fit for the bin, unless I can get someone to replace the Flash chip. Kind regards Paul. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74895t=74895 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: Stuck on Subinterfaces - HELP! [7:74854]
It may help to think of it this way. When you have a single physical and logical interface, it is easy for the router to determine how to process the incoming/outgoing traffic, it just uses the attributes assigned to the interface, that is its only option. When you add a subinterface, while you are not adding another physical interface, from the router's perspective and for routing/policy functions you are. The router now has to be able to differentiate incoming/outgoing traffic on that interface using some parameter, and determine which sub-interface the traffic belongs to so that it can set policies, perform filtering etc. So, what methods do you have to give the router some way of differentiating traffic when you have a single physical, but multiple logical interfaces? You have frame relay dlcis (WAN), atm pvcs (WAN) and vlan assignments for Ethernet (LAN). What you have done now is enabled the router to differentiate incoming/outgoing traffic and determine by some parameter which sub-interface the traffic is assigned to. If you have point to point serial interfaces, you can run frame relay back to back with sub-interfaces to test this, I can't find the link right now but I am sure it is in the archives somewhere. -Original Message- From: Rich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 11:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Stuck on Subinterfaces - HELP! [7:74854] Could someone help a CCNP student who is really confused? I am currently studying for the BSCI Routing Exam using the Sybex Books on a home Lab of 4 2500's and 1 2600. It has been working great and I have always been very pleased with the Sybex Series. Unfortunately they have never covered Subinterfaces well enough and many of the Labs In the CCNP BSCI book are using them without much explanation. They have various Labs that use OSPF, IS-IS, BGP etc. to route IP over Serial Subinterfaces on what I see as just a Plain old LAN. All they do is show the IP Addresses and Networks already arranged, some on Serial Subinterfaces, and go right into the Routing Protocol configurations. They don't say anything at this point about using a Frame Relay, ATM, IPX, or ISL for VLAN's on them in this book. Those topics are covered in the Remote Access and Switching Books. My problem is: when I set up Subinterfaces on the Serial Ports with IP Addresses, set the clocking, and then bring up the interfaces, they all show as Interface Up and Line Protocol up - But I just can't seem to Ping any of the IP's on the Serial ports if they, or the other end they are attached to, are Subinterfaces. If I can't Ping I sure can't route right? When I stick to regular physical interfaces, everything works great. Am I missing something important? If any of you Cisco Experts out there could offer any suggestions, I would hugely appreciate it. I'm kind of stuck on Stall right now and can't move on to any of the other Labs until I resolve this. Thanks. Rich. **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74896t=74854 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: HSRP [7:74879]
Clients will point to the HSRP address as their default gw -Original Message- From: Marko Milivojevic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 05 September 2003 13:05 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: HSRP [7:74879] In the case above, is the client gateway going to be 10.254.0.1 (IP Address of the Active router), which we are currently using, or is it 10.254.0.103 (HSRP IP Address)... If clients set default gateway to 10.254.0.1, when that router fails, HSRP won't be of any use. On the other hand, if they set their default gateway to 10.254.0.103, if any of the two routers is active, they will still be able to talk to the outside world. Marko. **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74899t=74879 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: route redistribution [7:74856]
The application of the metric is done at the time of redistribution not after. Remember that the router already knows of the route and has it in its routing table it is just in a different language(protocol) than the recieving protocol understands so a translation is done. This in concept is redistribution. Remember that the route must be in the routers routing table before it is redistributed. Also if you look at where the command is applied (under the recieving protocol) you will notice that although it is call redistribution the routes are actually imported by the recieving protocol form the routing table then has the metric changed. I think it should have been called route importing. But that is just my opinion. I am sure someone will correct me if I am wrong Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74897t=74856 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: Stuck on Subinterfaces - HELP! [7:74854]
Thanks for the detailed description Guy. That helps quite a bit. I think maybe the Book just assumes that when you see IP's on Serial Subinterfaces, you will understand that Frame Relay Encapsulation was set up on them ahead of time and just skips ahead to the OSPF, IS-IS configurations. So I skipped ahead yesterday to the Remote Access Book and learned all about Frame Relay Networks. Another question then: When you say Frame Relay running Back to Back, does this mean that I could set up Frame Relay Point-to-Point Encapsulation between Serial Subinterfaces on 2 Routers directly without a Frame Relay Switch or Network in the middle? If so this may be what is shown in the Labs in the Book. Thanks Again. Rich. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74901t=74854 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: Question regarding dialer-watch [7:74900]
Hi group... Found the problem My virtual link had got the cost of the bri interface, which I had sett to 65535.. This did so that the virtual link never came up... Thanks for all the advices -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of SEC Groupstudy Sent: 3. september 2003 10:49 To: Security Group Study; 'Jens Petter Eikeland' Subject: RE: Question regarding dialer-watch Hi, You need to do some relavent debugs on the router. may I suggest you try: debug isdn events, debug isdn error, debug ppp events etc. you may like to try a debug ip packet on the dialer interface - but be careful. My guess is that you'll see a encapsulation failed type message. Post your configs Adam -- From: Jens Petter Eikeland[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply To: Jens Petter Eikeland Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 5:08 PM To: Security Group Study; Groupstudy Subject: Question regarding dialer-watch I have put up a solution with isdn backup to a primary Frame-Relay link. This is set up with Tacacs callback solution. The link seems to function fine. Then I try to put on dialer-watch on the client side of this link. When I shall test this by bringing sown the primary, everything looks fine. The backup is coming up, the routes ar prefered over isdn. But when I try to send any trafic I form of pings or telnet nothing happens Even when the link are up my packet wont go over the link. I have also a friend that is having the same problem, and then I guess There will be other that has experienced this.. Please help, I have only days before my lab attempt Jens P Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74900t=74900 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: Stuck on Subinterfaces - HELP! [7:74854]
Larry Letterman wrote: Not necessarily...you can also use point-point frame With sub-interfaces... Larry Letterman Cisco Systems You must subinterface for p-p frame. The physical frame encapsulated interface is multipoint. Yes I know you can use the frame-relay interface dlci x command on the physical interface though that doesn't make it right:) Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Raj Singh Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 9:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Stuck on Subinterfaces - HELP! [7:74854] Use the frame relay for subinterfaces. You use subinterfaces to connect multiple frame relay location to the hub. Raj **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html -- David Madland CCIE# 2016 Sr. Network Engineer Qwest Communications 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74902t=74854 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: DR Solution [7:74875]
I'm confused. Assuming that the users are separated from their servers by at least one router hop (otherwise if the servers failed, so would the users, so what's the use of the DR?), then why can't you just assign the same IP addresses to the servers at the DR site? If the production servers are up, then the users would get routed to those servers. If the servers or server site fails, then the users would get routed to the DR site, with the backup servers that have the same IP addresses. I fail to see the issue. Fred Reimer - CCNA Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338 Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050 NOTICE; This email contains confidential or proprietary information which may be legally privileged. It is intended only for the named recipient(s). If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected the email, please notify the author by replying to this message. If you are not the named recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer. -Original Message- From: Luan Pham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 5:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: DR Solution [7:74875] Hi, I was jsut looking at various options for having link redundancy adn site redundancy. Just wanted to know the various solutions can be deployed for such a kindof requirement? -- ||--Router C ( Site B,DR Site which is |ISP |in Standby , should -site A fails) || || || || ----- Router ARouter B (Site A where A adn B are in VRRP) 1. Active servers behind Router A 2. Router B would kick-in if Router A fails. 3. Incase the site A fails,the traffic should be automatically diverted to Router C (Site B). 4. Site A will be replicated to Site B using a link between Site A and B. 5. Site A and site B has two different IP addressing schemes. 6. Instead of a single ISP, what would be the solution if Router C was conencted to a diffrent ISP? The users (outside to Site A and B) will be accessing site A purely using IP addresses (no DNS). what would be the solution at ISP level to acheive the above reqmt? If the applications were accessed using names GSLB would ahve been the solution. Thanks LP. **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74905t=74875 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Issue Redistributing Connected Frame Relay Subint [7:74904]
Redistributing is not working for Frame Relay subinterfaces. R1 inter loo 0 ip ad 100.100.100.1 255.255.255.255 ! inter eth 0 ip ad 172.16.13.9 255.255.255.252 int ser 0.1 point-to-point ip ad 192.168.12.5 255.255.255.252 frame-relay interface-dlci 112 ! router ospf 1 netw 172.16.13.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 redistribute connected subnets metric 10 Network 192.168.12.4 does not appear on R2's routing table. Any Thoughts? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74904t=74904 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Anyone seen this on a 2950?? [7:74906]
We have about 60 2950s that are exhibiting this behavior: Add an ACL (approx 17 ACEs) either via CiscoWorks or manually, delete the ACL, try to recreate a new ACL and the switch starts throwing ASIC resource errors and some ports begin to act funky (can't get DHCP reservations, but can get to web resources, ports go orange, etc) We can reproduce this problem in several versions of the IOS. These are new 2950G switches with the enhanced firmware purchased new about 2 months ago. Thanks Jamie Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74906t=74906 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: Stuck on Subinterfaces - HELP! [7:74854]
Yes, when I say frame relay back to back or point to point I mean that you can have one router's serial directly connected to another's and run frame relay sub interfaces on each, with no frame switch. Unfortunately I don't have the link that shows how to do this and I never memorized it, I am sure someone on the list does though. -Original Message- From: Richard Orabone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 9:58 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Stuck on Subinterfaces - HELP! [7:74854] Thanks for the detailed description Guy. That helps quite a bit. I think maybe the Book just assumes that when you see IP's on Serial Subinterfaces, you will understand that Frame Relay Encapsulation was set up on them ahead of time and just skips ahead to the OSPF, IS-IS configurations. So I skipped ahead yesterday to the Remote Access Book and learned all about Frame Relay Networks. Another question then: When you say Frame Relay running Back to Back, does this mean that I could set up Frame Relay Point-to-Point Encapsulation between Serial Subinterfaces on 2 Routers directly without a Frame Relay Switch or Network in the middle? If so this may be what is shown in the Labs in the Book. Thanks Again. Rich. **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74908t=74854 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Aux port and modem connectivity [7:74909]
Guys, If I have a modem connected to the AUx port can can I harden the cisco so that it can make calls but will never be able to receive any calls? Here is kind of my config.. Thx,. interface Async65 bandwidth 28 ip address 192.168.116.64 255.255.255.0 encapsulation ppp dialer in-band dialer idle-timeout 300 dialer wait-for-carrier-time 15 dialer map ip 172.20.241.1 dialer hold-queue 25 dialer-group 1 async default routing async mode interactive pulse-time 3 no cdp enable ppp authentication chap access-list 101 deny udp any any access-list 101 permit ip any any dialer-list 1 protocol ip list 101 line aux 0 exec-timeout 0 0 modem InOut modem autoconfigure discovery transport input all stopbits 1 speed 115200 flowcontrol hardware *** | Bob Perez | | Intercept Payment Solutions | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | 100 West Commons BLVD | | New Castle, DE 19720 | | Phone: 302.326.0700 | | Cell: 302.420.6883 | | www.intercept.net | | | --- | | || || | :|: :|: | | :|||: :|||: | | ..:|||:...:|||:.. | | ___ | | C i s c o S y s t e m s | | CCNA CCNP MCSE NET+ | | | *** Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74909t=74909 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: Stuck on Subinterfaces - read the Caslow book [7:74907]
This stuff is covered in gory detail in the Caslow book - I wouldn't have completed my CCNP/CCDP with that. Rich wrote: Could someone help a CCNP student who is really confused? I am currently studying for the BSCI Routing Exam using the Sybex Books on a home Lab of 4 2500's and 1 2600. It has been working great and I have always been very pleased with the Sybex Series. Unfortunately they have never covered Subinterfaces well enough and many of the Labs In the CCNP BSCI book are using them without much explanation. They have various Labs that use OSPF, IS-IS, BGP etc. to route IP over Serial Subinterfaces on what I see as just a Plain old LAN. All they do is show the IP Addresses and Networks already arranged, some on Serial Subinterfaces, and go right into the Routing Protocol configurations. They don't say anything at this point about using a Frame Relay, ATM, IPX, or ISL for VLAN's on them in this book. Those topics are covered in the Remote Access and Switching Books. My problem is: when I set up Subinterfaces on the Serial Ports with IP Addresses, set the clocking, and then bring up the interfaces, they all show as Interface Up and Line Protocol up - But I just can't seem to Ping any of the IP's on the Serial ports if they, or the other end they are attached to, are Subinterfaces. If I can't Ping I sure can't route right? When I stick to regular physical interfaces, everything works great. Am I missing something important? If any of you Cisco Experts out there could offer any suggestions, I would hugely appreciate it. I'm kind of stuck on Stall right now and can't move on to any of the other Labs until I resolve this. Thanks. Rich. **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html -- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] phone:402-301-9555 After all that I've been through, you're the only one who matters, you never left me in the dark here on my own - Widespread Panic Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74907t=74907 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
2900XL and 3500XL failuers [7:74910]
This may be of interest to some of you. We had been experiencing a high number of failures of 3500XL switches, on customer in the last year replaced 60+ 3500's, and we thought something was amiss. Got this info recently: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/770/fn26174.shtml Dave -- David Madland CCIE# 2016 Sr. Network Engineer Qwest Communications 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74910t=74910 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Undeliverable: Re: Approved [7:74912]
Your message To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Approved Sent:Fri, 5 Sep 2003 06:46:06 -0500 did not reach the following recipient(s): c=US;a= ;p=PROVANT;o=STAR?MOUNTAIN;dda:[EMAIL PROTECTED]; on Fri, 5 Sep 2003 12:01:58 -0500 The recipient name is not recognized The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=PROVANT;l=SERVER20309051701S2LDYTCL MSEXCH:IMS:PROVANT:STAR_MOUNTAIN:SERVER2 0 (000C05A6) Unknown Recipient From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Approved Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2003 06:46:06 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Please see the attached file for details. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74912t=74912 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: Stuck on Subinterfaces - HELP! [7:74854]
Use no keep alive statements and connect the back-back cables.. Then set the interfaces for frame encapsulation.. Larry Letterman Cisco Systems -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lupi, Guy Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 8:49 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Stuck on Subinterfaces - HELP! [7:74854] Yes, when I say frame relay back to back or point to point I mean that you can have one router's serial directly connected to another's and run frame relay sub interfaces on each, with no frame switch. Unfortunately I don't have the link that shows how to do this and I never memorized it, I am sure someone on the list does though. -Original Message- From: Richard Orabone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 9:58 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Stuck on Subinterfaces - HELP! [7:74854] Thanks for the detailed description Guy. That helps quite a bit. I think maybe the Book just assumes that when you see IP's on Serial Subinterfaces, you will understand that Frame Relay Encapsulation was set up on them ahead of time and just skips ahead to the OSPF, IS-IS configurations. So I skipped ahead yesterday to the Remote Access Book and learned all about Frame Relay Networks. Another question then: When you say Frame Relay running Back to Back, does this mean that I could set up Frame Relay Point-to-Point Encapsulation between Serial Subinterfaces on 2 Routers directly without a Frame Relay Switch or Network in the middle? If so this may be what is shown in the Labs in the Book. Thanks Again. Rich. **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74913t=74854 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: Exam #642-891 BSCN/BCMSN Composite Exam. [7:74077]
Karl, did you find what you were looking for? It is my understanding that the 642-891 is the only test that you need to take to renew both certifications. That is if you are already a NP/DP. According to the Cisco website, you are being tested only on BSCI/BCMSN. Atleast that is my understanding. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74914t=74077 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Exam #642-891 BSCI/BCMSN Composite Exam [7:74915]
Has anyone taking this new composite exam yet? I went and bought both the BSCI/BCMSN books that Cisco recommended for training for this exam, but I'm not finding all the info that I need in there. I see on the blue print that there is a lot of Voice, QoS in the exam, but didn't find any of that in my two books. Am I missing something (and that wouldn't be the first time) or can someone tell me what links that they used to study for these sections. One last thing, was it a hard test? :) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74915t=74915 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Strange message [7:74916]
Hi Group, after I start my Router I get the following messages: System Bootstrap, Version 4.14(2) [fc3], SOFTWARE Copyright (c) 1986-1993 by cisco Systems 3000 processor with 16384 Kbytes of main memory Bad mask 255.255.255.255 for address 200.0.0.5 Illegal IP keyword - mroute-cache Unknown or ambiguous frame_relay subcommand-de-group Illegal IP keyword - classless Booting c2500-ins-l.120-18.bin from Flash address space F3: 7917940+105872+512684 at 0x360 The router has a problem with a /32 subnet mask and the keyword Classless is illegal. Does anybody has a clue why I get this messages. Thanks, Lesly Verdier Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74916t=74916 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: Exam #642-891 BSCI/BCMSN Composite Exam [7:74915]
Scott, I just took the composite exam this morning and passed. First of all, the information given on the cisco site, (http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/testing/current_exams/642-891.html) is incorrect. There are 88 questions, not 55-65 and the test is not 60 minutes, its' 120 minutes. To study for the exam, I used Sybex-BSCI and Sybex-Switching(copyright2003)and Sybex-CCIE study guide (copyright 2003). I highly recommend you read the CCIE study guide, also. Difficulty level on a 1-10 scale... 8 (in my opinion). Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74917t=74915 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: Strange message [7:74916]
Did you upgrade/downgrade IOS recently? Usually it means those commands were put in the config when the device had an IOS that supported those commands. Then, IOS changed that doesn't support those commands anymore and the router fails to load those commands at startup. That's were the errors messages are coming from. Lesly Verdier wrote: Hi Group, after I start my Router I get the following messages: System Bootstrap, Version 4.14(2) [fc3], SOFTWARE Copyright (c) 1986-1993 by cisco Systems 3000 processor with 16384 Kbytes of main memory Bad mask 255.255.255.255 for address 200.0.0.5 Illegal IP keyword - mroute-cache Unknown or ambiguous frame_relay subcommand-de-group Illegal IP keyword - classless Booting c2500-ins-l.120-18.bin from Flash address space F3: 7917940+105872+512684 at 0x360 The router has a problem with a /32 subnet mask and the keyword Classless is illegal. Does anybody has a clue why I get this messages. Thanks, Lesly Verdier Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74919t=74916 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: Exam #642-891 BSCI/BCMSN Composite Exam [7:74915]
I heard it was pretty difficult. I was wondering how they were going to go through all that material in only 55 questions. Thanks for the input! I guess I will have to find some new study material. Scott Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74918t=74915 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: Off topic. Non Jet direct printers [7:74831]
Try an external jetdirect box. You dont have to use an HP printer with them. Then conect via IP to a server (WIN2K for instance) and share them from there. Your clients will connect to the printers via the server, which will serve as the print que. Now you have centeralized printing. All clients connect to the same IP to print. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74920t=74831 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
ARCH exam consolidated material [7:74921]
Hello Can someone help me by pointing good consolidated material to pass ARCH exam ? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74921t=74921 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
