Cisco PCMICIA Utility
Does anyone have or know where to get the Cisco software package for formatting a PCMCIA Flash card in your PC and doing file manipulation with it (Using the Cisco format so it's compatible when you stick it back in the router or switch)??? I know it exists, but I have searched hi and low on CCO to no avail. Thanks, Shawn _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CID test vs. CCIE written
It is similar in length, but it encompasses different items. The "feel" is similar, though you can go back through your answers on the written as many times as you want. I don't care what Cisco's www site says, it still has TON's of Token Ring questions, you better know RIF's really well. There is ATM and LANE on it as well. Also some very detailed circuit questions. IPX framing questions, basic DLSW, and STUN were on it as well. I took both of these last week, CID on Monday and CCIE on Tuesday, I was still amazed at some of the abstract crap they through at me. Good luck, Shawn P.S. RIF = http://www.groupstudy.com/archives/cisco/199901/msg01626.html -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dennis Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2000 1:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CID test vs. CCIE written Just took and passed the CID test. I have heard that this test is similar in scope to the CCIE R/S qualification test. Anybody have any feedback on that statement? Also, does anyone know if there are command line type ins on the CCIE written? And can anyone recommend a good 'one-pager' on RIF's, Token Ring, bridging, etc?? Thanks, Dennis CCNP, CCDP _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IGRP Propagation???
That is weird, but if that's the case put the interface to the upstream in passive mode and give it a try. That way your providor won't see any advertisements from you (Which they should ignore anyway). Shawn -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Timothy Metz Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2000 3:56 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: IGRP Propagation??? Here's a strange one... maybe someone can shed some light... My home setup: Access Layer: 2505 Distro Layer: 2501 Core Layer: Netgear RT314 (DSL Router) Workstations on 8 port hub (built into the 2505) Access to Distro: Frame Relay Distro to Core (LAN side): Ethernet Core to Cloud (WAN side): Seimans DSL Modem I don't know alot about the telecom side of DSL but my ISP knows who I am based on my login, I do not get authenticated when checking mail or news. If I enable IGRP on the Cisco routers (The netgear is RIP only) then I get a message saying that I am not authorized to access the mail or news server on the ISP side. When I disable IGRP all is fine. Any thoughts? Thanks, Tim _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Confused (was Re: is this statement true ??)
Yup, makes sense. I can only speak for 3Com on this one, but I believe Cisco implements similar features. On a 3Com Corebuilder (as well as their Workgroup Switches) they use fake collisions as a flow control mechanism. In other words if there was contention at the server or switch and they couldn't handle the load then a collision (a JAM) will be sent. Now, that said after we all just agreed that collisions can not happen on a full duplex Ethernet segment:) If you notice in Cisco texts that Collision Detection is disabled on full duplex links, this is not true. Collision detection is still there, at least on a 5000 and can be simulated by loading up a server at 10MB FD with a few 100MB FD clients on the other end of the Cat, you will see this in action. 3Com does the same thing, I thought this was kinda interesting. Shawn -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Priscilla Oppenheimer Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2000 2:06 PM To: Andy Walden; John lay Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Confused (was Re: is this statement true ??) I think what John is getting at is that there is still contention. In his example with two clients trying to reach one server, there's contention at the switch, and at the server possibly. There's no contention on the medium itself. There's only one device trying to send at any one time. The switch has its transmit pair and the server has its own transmit pair. If the switch has two frames to send to the server, the backup happens at the switch. Does that make sense? Priscilla At 08:33 AM 12/26/00, Andy Walden wrote: This is correct. You don't use full duplex if you are competing for bandwidth, ie, plugged into a hub. But if you are plugged into a switch, there is only one bandwidth domain between the device and switch and with nothing competing for the bandwidth on that link so you can go full duplex. andy On Tue, 26 Dec 2000, John lay wrote: Priscilla, everybody, I am confused. Ethernet and FastEthernet uses the CSMA/CD as a channel allocation techinque in a shared media access envoiroment. Here it comes the confusion, when you are saying that the Full-duplex does not support CSMA/CD because the transmit and receive are on different wires. This implies that in this case there is no shared media, how come if you have two clients competing to talk to the same server simultaneously!! Thanx On Mon, 25 Dec 2000 16:36:11 -0800, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: It's true for Ethernet because Ethernet's CSMA/CD media access control method has strict timing requirements, which result in strict length restrictions. Half-duplex uses CSMA/CD. Full-duplex does not. I wouldn't say it's true in general, however. Priscilla At 05:32 PM 12/25/00, Li Song wrote: "full-duplex can be used over longer distance than half-duplex" ?? what 's your opinion ?? _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Send a cool gift with your E-Card http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Confused (was Re: is this statement true ??)
I believe we are saying mostly the same thing. Your "* Extended carrier to indicate busy (assert carrier beyond the length of the packet)." Is an Ethernet JAM signal. That's the same thing I was saying, though I was putting it in more layman's terms, it's also what is immediately transmitted onto the segment after a collision is detected to start the back off routine. Cat's will see collisions in this configuration. I wasn't trying to start a huge issue over this, merely pointing out to someone something that I found interesting. The only reason I took it to any depth was the fact that other than duplex mismatches a lot of people getting into this field (reading these posts) haven't ever been exposed to such nuances. And I also guess I wanted to point out that the Cisco documentation is not "always" 100% accurate in the real world. Shawn -Original Message- From: Jeff Kell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2000 12:16 AM To: Bowen, Shawn Cc: Priscilla Oppenheimer; Andy Walden; John lay; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Confused (was Re: is this statement true ??) "Bowen, Shawn" wrote: Yup, makes sense. I can only speak for 3Com on this one, but I believe Cisco implements similar features. On a 3Com Corebuilder (as well as their Workgroup Switches) they use fake collisions as a flow control mechanism. In other words if there was contention at the server or switch and they couldn't handle the load then a collision (a JAM) will be sent. Now, that said after we all just agreed that collisions can not happen on a full duplex Ethernet segment:) If you notice in Cisco texts that Collision Detection is disabled on full duplex links, this is not true. Collision detection is still there, at least on a 5000 and can be simulated by loading up a server at 10MB FD with a few 100MB FD clients on the other end of the Cat, you will see this in action. 3Com does the same thing, I thought this was kinda interesting. If collisions are reported on the Cisco 5000 then forget my following diatribe as I don't have time to simulate it (and no testbed 5000, it would be the production switch). You stated (let me repeat it for emphasis)... Collision detection is still there, at least on a 5000 and can be simulated by loading up a server at 10MB FD with a few 100MB FD ^^^ clients on the other end of the Cat, you will see this in action. Older switches implement flow control in one of two ways: * Simulated collisions (not terribly efficient), or * Extended carrier to indicate busy (assert carrier beyond the length of the packet). With 100Mbps we have varying implementations of the 802.something method of the "pause" indicator in the header, and/or the "throttle" mechanism (in Cisco terminology). But your example specifically indicates 10Mb, which has another variable. In 10Mb ethernet, many NICs are setup to detect "jabber" -- asserting carrier longer than the max packet length. If this is detected, the transmit circuit is turned off (ref Siefert, _Gigabit Ethernet_). All of the flow controls, as well as the "jabber" detection, can result in a variety of line errors. Only in the "throttle" case does a Cisco switch continue without logging errors other than throttle packet counts. Throttling or pausing is undefined for 10Mb which may be the corner case you are presenting, depending upon the intelligence of the NIC in the server. In a normal case, I would expect discards if you were throwing many 100Mb clients at a 10Mb server connection, after all flow control and switch store-and-forward buffers had been exhausted. You can overload some of the older Catalyst switches (2926 for example) which has 24 ports at 100Mb and 2 uplinks at 100Mb but only 1.2Gb backplane. If we ignore the potential overloading of the uplink(s), the switch cannot handle the potential load. The newer 2924XL/3524XLs are more in line with a 3Gbps backplane and could handle a full (distributed) load, but still suffer from uplink congestion which is dependent on the buffer space. This is less of an issue with a 1000xX uplink but you can still, in theory, overload the bandwidth of the switch. But this is true of any vendor's switch, if you oversubscribe the uplink, you can overload the switch, regardless of flow control, buffer size, etc. Bottom line, in southern terminology, there ain't no collisions on a full-duplex link :-) Jeff Kell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Systems/Network Administrator University of Tennessee at Chattanooga _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Confused (was Re: is this statement true ??)
I might also add I'm a southern fella myself. But I must argue that you "can" see collisions and late collisions on a full duplex link. Before I get thrashed, I understand FULLY that full duplex is TX to RX so it "should" be impossible but I was just answering for a fellow earlier about this. On 10MB links the Collision mechanism and it's corresponding JAM signal are used as rudimentary flow control mechanisms, and can be seen on FD switches. Another thing is you CAN see them from is crosstalk, cable attenuation issues, Floresant lights, (and sun spots j/k), power cables trashing your signal, and many other weird ones. Telnet to a production switch with a lot of traffic going through it and take a peak sometime, then clear the counters and let it roll on. And heck who knows, I'm wrong on occasion, if I am now I just need to lay off the crack:) j/k Shawn -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jeff Kell Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2000 12:16 AM To: Bowen, Shawn Cc: Priscilla Oppenheimer; Andy Walden; John lay; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Confused (was Re: is this statement true ??) "Bowen, Shawn" wrote: Yup, makes sense. I can only speak for 3Com on this one, but I believe Cisco implements similar features. On a 3Com Corebuilder (as well as their Workgroup Switches) they use fake collisions as a flow control mechanism. In other words if there was contention at the server or switch and they couldn't handle the load then a collision (a JAM) will be sent. Now, that said after we all just agreed that collisions can not happen on a full duplex Ethernet segment:) If you notice in Cisco texts that Collision Detection is disabled on full duplex links, this is not true. Collision detection is still there, at least on a 5000 and can be simulated by loading up a server at 10MB FD with a few 100MB FD clients on the other end of the Cat, you will see this in action. 3Com does the same thing, I thought this was kinda interesting. If collisions are reported on the Cisco 5000 then forget my following diatribe as I don't have time to simulate it (and no testbed 5000, it would be the production switch). You stated (let me repeat it for emphasis)... Collision detection is still there, at least on a 5000 and can be simulated by loading up a server at 10MB FD with a few 100MB FD ^^^ clients on the other end of the Cat, you will see this in action. Older switches implement flow control in one of two ways: * Simulated collisions (not terribly efficient), or * Extended carrier to indicate busy (assert carrier beyond the length of the packet). With 100Mbps we have varying implementations of the 802.something method of the "pause" indicator in the header, and/or the "throttle" mechanism (in Cisco terminology). But your example specifically indicates 10Mb, which has another variable. In 10Mb ethernet, many NICs are setup to detect "jabber" -- asserting carrier longer than the max packet length. If this is detected, the transmit circuit is turned off (ref Siefert, _Gigabit Ethernet_). All of the flow controls, as well as the "jabber" detection, can result in a variety of line errors. Only in the "throttle" case does a Cisco switch continue without logging errors other than throttle packet counts. Throttling or pausing is undefined for 10Mb which may be the corner case you are presenting, depending upon the intelligence of the NIC in the server. In a normal case, I would expect discards if you were throwing many 100Mb clients at a 10Mb server connection, after all flow control and switch store-and-forward buffers had been exhausted. You can overload some of the older Catalyst switches (2926 for example) which has 24 ports at 100Mb and 2 uplinks at 100Mb but only 1.2Gb backplane. If we ignore the potential overloading of the uplink(s), the switch cannot handle the potential load. The newer 2924XL/3524XLs are more in line with a 3Gbps backplane and could handle a full (distributed) load, but still suffer from uplink congestion which is dependent on the buffer space. This is less of an issue with a 1000xX uplink but you can still, in theory, overload the bandwidth of the switch. But this is true of any vendor's switch, if you oversubscribe the uplink, you can overload the switch, regardless of flow control, buffer size, etc. Bottom line, in southern terminology, there ain't no collisions on a full-duplex link :-) Jeff Kell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Systems/Network Administrator University of Tennessee at Chattanooga _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: is this statement true ??
Very well said Priscilla, more or less what I was trying to say from memory. Also included in this is that when a collision is detected a jam is sent on the wire and the back off mechanism comes into play, should another collision occur, then another back off of a longer period takes place, and so on. After 4 (If I remember correctly) back offs the packet is dropped and left to a higher layer protocol to retransmit. You are correct that a late collision indicates a collision that is past the preamble and should never happen in a properly designed and specified Ethernet segment, however when they do occur it is most likely a cable that is beyond length in spec. While we are on the topic I am often asked what a runt is, simply put it is the fragments that result in collisions on an Ethernet segment, a somewhat normal condition. With Store and Forward switching runts will be eliminated from the wire while with cut-through switching they can be propagated. This being said, even though Cut-Through can be faster on a lightly loaded network store and forward can provide for higher throughput on a more saturated network due to this fact. Also I am asked what giants are. They are the result of an Ethernet frame being larger than the IEEE limit of 1524 (Or 1518 depending on who your talking to) Bytes. This can be from a few things, the most important being VLAN tagging. Other sources are mis-configured stations on the wire or NIC's that are spewing garbage on the wire. For anyone really interested in a GREAT sight covering these items the original writer of the CNX certification has an excellent web site with all these goodies on it. It is www.optimized.com go there and check out the Technical Compendium link. Merry Christmas to all, Shawn -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Priscilla Oppenheimer Sent: Monday, December 25, 2000 7:47 PM To: Bowen, Shawn; Li Song; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: is this statement true ?? At 01:07 PM 12/25/00, Bowen, Shawn wrote: According to IEEE NO, 100 Meters is the max cable distance for Half or Full 100MB Ethernet over TP. In reality, Yes it will extend the range, The reason why is that at full duplex you can not have collisions, and collisions are the main reason for the distance limitation (Cross Talk comes into play as well). The reason behind this is that in the original IEEE spec the distance limitation was set so that a single 64Byte packet (the smallest) could be transmitted down the line and would collide with another packet before the 64Byte packet header had been completely transmitted, when Minor correction: The distance limitation is defined so that if a station is transmitting a minimum-size frame (64 bytes) and a collision occurs at the other end of the network, the collision will reflect back to the sender while the sender is still sending. If this didn't happen, the sender would have stopped monitoring for a collision with its transmission, and would not automatically retry. An upper layer would have to retransmit, which takes a lot longer. this does not happen properly you see late collisions, these indicate a collision past the preamble header of the packet and indicate a cable length that is to long. A late collision is one that happens past the preamble and past the first 64 bytes of the frame. A collision within the first 64 bytes is legal, normal, and not late. Priscilla If you need to even go close to the 100 Meter mark you should consider 100BaseFX or similar. Shawn -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Li Song Sent: Monday, December 25, 2000 4:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: is this statement true ?? "full-duplex can be used over longer distance than half-duplex" ?? what 's your opinion ?? _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CSU
CSU is a channel service unit. A CSU/DSU is similar to a modem in that it converts analog signals to digital, as well as providing a mechanism for breaking down individual DS0's in a DS1 so that they can be bundled or muxed out. This would be the piece of equipment between you and the Telco, a typical configuration would be Router to CSU/DSU to Telco SmartJack or local DAX to local loop to long haul to remote local loop to smart jack / local DAX to CSU/DSU to Router. Several flavors of routers have CSU/DSU's built into them so that the external box is no longer necessary in some cases. Shawn -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hunt Sent: Saturday, December 23, 2000 5:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CSU Can anyone please tell me what is a CSU? And what is it used for? Hunt =^o^= _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: can u route in boot mode?
Had this issue last night. 7505 wit 2 VIPS's. Came up in boot mode and wouldn't fire up any Ethernet ports, all were UP/DOWN indicating a physical connection problem, I to wanted to drop new code on it with a directly connected TFTP laptop (I used the right cables). I ended up resolving it by going to ROMMON Changing confreg to boot without the config, blowing the config away, resetting the config registers and bouncing the router. It came up fine, added the config back to the router and worked AOK from then on. Happy Holidays, Shawn -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kane, Christopher A. Sent: Friday, December 22, 2000 3:09 PM To: 'Manny Akintayo'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: can u route in boot mode? My experience has been that you can't route packets, so it couldn't be "production". But, you could setup a default gateway. This way you could telnet to the router and setup to get IOS via TFTP. -Original Message- From: Manny Akintayo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 22, 2000 9:46 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: can u route in boot mode? no you can not route.Your router is in a coma-like state. a wrote: I have recently read that you can not route while in boot mode (0x101). I have a 7000 router and am able to route in boot mode just fine? what gives? thx a bunch. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 7505 Reboots randomly Please HELP
This is an issue with 12.07T, I have seen it a lot with AS5800's running this code. Boot without a config let it get FULLY booted, then copy start to run. This works for us, as it seems the router does not fully get initialized before certain configurations get loaded. Also, it seems that console logging on the 5800 is what kills it when it runs out of memory after initializing all the modems on the 5800's(1400 of em!). Like I said, I know why this happens on 5800s, I'm assuming the issue is following to the 7505's. One other note, if you have the back plane oversubscribed with certain cards it will do this as well. Shawn -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Desai, Inamul Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000 3:03 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 7505 Reboots randomly Please HELP We got 7505 router reboots randomly twice a week or when you write to config file. We gone thru changing VIP card, resetting all cards, resetting mem modules, swapping mem modules on VIP card, powering up and down and talked to Cisco. It's running IOS 12.0(7)T with RSM, VIP2 and one PRI module. No matter how many times you cold boot it, it brings all enable LEDs except one on fastEthenet card. It does help some time when I reset FLASH cards. D u think it's flash cards ? here is startup info: System Bootstrap, Version 5.3.2(3.2) [kmac 3.2], MAINTENANCE INTERIM SOFTWARE Copyright (c) 1994 by cisco Systems, Inc. RSP processor with 131072 Kbytes of main memory Creading the file into memory... Self decompressing the image : # ### [OK] %DBUS-3-SW_NOTRDY: DBUS software not ready after HARD RESET, elapsed 12032, stat us 0x0 -Traceback= 60192B5C 60195A84 60195B3C 6015444C 601546C8 60128990 600109B0 %DBUS-3-SW_NOTRDY: DBUS software not ready after HARD_RESET, elapsed 12032, stat us 0x0 -Traceback= 60192B5C 60194BA0 60195008 6019845C 600F4E64 600F4ECC 600E9090 600E9 298 600EA3B0 600EA39C %DBUS-3-SW_NOTRDY: DBUS software not ready after RESET, elapsed 12032, status 0x 40 -Traceback= 60192B5C 60194EC0 60191AF4 60195054 6019845C 600F4E64 600F4ECC 600E9 090 600E9298 600EA3B0 600EA39C System Bootstrap, Version 5.3.2(3.2) [kmac 3.2], MAINTENANCE INTERIM SOFTWARE Copyright (c) 1994 by cisco Systems, Inc. RSP processor with 131072 Kbytes of main memory Creading the file into memory... Self decompressing the image : # ### [OK] %CBUS-3-CCBPTIMEOUT: CCB handover timed out, CCB 0x5800FF50, slot 3 -Traceback= 601A5348 601A398C 601A3E3C 6019D4F0 600EE70C 600F4EFC 600E9090 600E9 298 600EA3B0 600EA39C %LINK-4-NOMAC: A random default MAC address of .0c9a.31e7 has been chosen. Ensure that this address is unique, or specify MAC addresses for commands (such as 'novell routing') that allow the use of this address as a default. %SYS-4-CONFIG_NEWER: Configurations from version 12.0 may not be correctly under stood.CC CC %CBUS-3-MIPSTAT: Out of buffers--losing status information for the MIP cardC CC _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [re - A silly question - modified]
Ctrl-shift-6 let go then X Shawn -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Charles Nunie Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000 12:13 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [re - A silly question - modified] Thanx. For years I've tried to figure that one out. Dzilo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I believe it is ctrl+shift+6 al at the same time. Gene While I try to ping a remote ip address from the router CLI, I am asked to type escape sequence to abort. I know I would sound silly asking this question, But to be honest, I don't know the answer for this. Can anyone tell me what is the escape sequence to abort pinging from the CLI. *** I am pinging from within a telnet session to the Router *** Thanks in Advance, S.Kalidasan _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1 _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
