Re: Something annoying about show run [7:18746]

2001-09-05 Thread Brad Beck

Easy enough... simply type 'term len 0' (short for 'terminal length 0') 
before 'sho run'.

-brad


At 12:31 AM 09/06/2001 -0400, Lupi, Guy wrote:
>Does anyone know if there is a way to do a show run, and then hit a key that
>makes the entire config show?  I hate having to hit spacebar 100 times to
>get all the way through.  Thanks.
>
>Guy H. Lupi
>NOC Engineer
>Eureka GGN
>39 Broadway 19th Floor
>NY, NY 10006




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=18750&t=18746
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: how to build a pix firewall out of a PC box. [7:18335]

2001-09-04 Thread Brad Beck

Perhaps the entire group doesn't need to see all the "me too" responses???


At 01:18 AM 09/05/2001 -0400, Vishal Punjabi wrote:
>Me too
>Vishal
>-Original Message-
>From: samuel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 1:07 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: how to build a pix firewall out of a PC box. [7:18335]
>
>
>Me to
>
>Samuel ho
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
>Tonton Rabena
>Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 12:25 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: how to build a pix firewall out of a PC box. [7:18335]
>
>count me too..
>
>""Richard""  wrote in message
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Count me in...
> >
> >
> > ""mike johnson""  wrote in message
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > Hi Everyone,
> > >
> > > For those who are interested in learning Cisco PIX but
> > > do NOT want to spend a lot of money on buying an
> > > expensive PIX Firewall, I think I can help you.  I
> > > have instructions on how to build a PIX firewall by
> > > using a PC.  In case you didn't know, PIX firewall is
> > > essentially a PC with multiple interfaces.  I've
> > > successfully built several PIX firewall using my old
> > > PCs (i.e. pentium 200 MHz processor).  Actually, the
> > > PIX1 series (obsolete I know) is a PC with Intel
> > > EtherExpress Interface cards.  However, you must have
> > > an account with CCO in order the software and download
> > > the software.  The rest of the instructions on how to
> > > build a PIX firewall using PC is very simple.  Anyone
> > > interested in learning it, let me know.
> > >
> > > Mike
> > >
> > > __
> > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo!
> > Messenger
> > > http://im.yahoo.com
>_
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=18559&t=18335
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: debug command [7:4966]

2001-05-18 Thread Brad Beck

Keep in mind also that fast switching is probably enabled on your RSM, 
which will not allow you to see most packets routed through the router with 
commands such as 'debug ip packet'.

-brad

At 04:17 PM 05/18/2001 -0400, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
>My guess it that the "debug ip udp" command will let you look at UDP
>packets generated by the router but not UDP packets forwarded by the
>router. You wouldn't want to slow down the router and ask it to look above
>the IP layer to see if it's a UDP packet and then display it on the console
>if it were.
>
>Try generating DNS queries from the router.
>
>And get a Sniffer! The router isn't a protocol analyzer. ;-)
>
>Priscilla
>
>At 06:47 AM 5/18/01, Dwayne Saunders wrote:
> >Hi all,
> > this might be a stupid question but when you use the debug ip udp
>on
> >a rsm blade of a catalyst 5500 what output would you expect to see. dns on
> >one side mail server on the other.
> >
> >I am getting no output at all when I do a domain lookup from the mail
server
> >to the dns is this correct or am I meant to see that traffic log to the
> >console
> >
> >D'Wayne Saunders
> >CCNA
> >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>Priscilla Oppenheimer
>http://www.priscilla.com
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: 
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5090&t=4966
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: extended ping [7:4307]

2001-05-13 Thread Brad Beck

Look it up on CCO.  The answer is easy to find.


At 03:26 AM 05/13/2001 -0400, Victim wrote:
>Hello,
>
>you can perform extended ping at which mode ( >  , #,  (config)) ??
>
>Also, what is the difference between extended ping and normal ping?
>
>Thanks!
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: 
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=4309&t=4307
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Cisco exam real question! [7:4306]

2001-05-13 Thread Brad Beck

Please don't post questions such as this on this list.  This is a clear 
no-no.  I don't know what you expect the group to do with these.  Tell you 
the answers?





At 03:23 AM 05/13/2001 -0400, Victim wrote:
>ciex1.2.1
>
>Which three statements about cisco's implementation of IP routing are true
>  choose three)?
>a. routers can learn next hops dynamicaly
>b. ip routing is disabled by default on cisco routers.
>c. routers can learn next hops through static routers.
>d. entering ip route in global onfiguration mode enables ip routing
>e. routers learn next hops by receiving periodic updates from other routers
>
>ciex1.3.2
>which two statements about cisco routers are true? (choose two)
>a. never connect a router with a U interface into an NT1
>b. always connect a rotuer with a U interface into an NT1
>c. if you see a connect labeled BRI, your router is a TE1
>d. if you see a connector labeled BRI, your rotuer is a TE2
>
>ciex1.2.3
>IPX servers advertise through __ updates
>a. SAP
>b. RIP
>c. NCP
>d. NLCP
>e. IGRP
>f.  NLSP
>
>ciex2.3.2
>Which three statements about flow control using connection-oriented
>protocols are ture? (choose three)
>a. if using TCP, a smaller window size will conserve available bandwidth.
>b. a TCP host sends a packet with a window size of zero if its receive
>buffers are full and it cannot receive any more data
>c. if a source does not receive an acknowledgment it knows that the packets
>should be retransmittted and that the transmission rate should be slowed
>d. positive acknowledgment requires a recipient to communicate with the
>source, sending back an ack. message when it receives data
>
>
>
>Real and tough!!
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: 
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=4308&t=4306
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: 3 Questions ??? [7:183]

2001-04-10 Thread Brad Beck

I don't want to lookup up the CLI options for the EIGRP default-metric 
command, but I can tell you that ip unnumbered will only work on 
point-to-point interfaces.

-brad

At 12:30 AM 04/11/2001 -0400, Frank Mendoza wrote:
>[demime could not interpret encoding binary - treating as plain text]
>Hi there,
>
>Would anyone help me to understand the following:
>
>1) How I should understand the following metric:
>
>  default-metric 1 100 255 1 1500
>
>2) What's the difference between IPXWAN and IPX? I know that IPXWAN is for
>WAN connections...
>
>3) Can I configured an "ip unnumbered" on a BVI interface??
>
>
>Thanks,
>Frank.
>
>
>Are you a web investor? Free email at http://www.webinvestor.com.au
>EquityCafe: for web investors. Click here: http://www.equitycafe.com.au
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: 
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=199&t=183
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: CCIE lab scenarios to trade

2001-04-01 Thread Brad Beck

Mr. Johnson,

I do believe you will find most of us on this list are concerned with the 
NDA.  I can't imagine an inquiry such as yours will prompt positive response.

-brad




At 08:29 PM 04/01/2001 -0500, mike johnson wrote:
>hello,
>
>Wondering if anyone has any real CCIE lab scenarios to trade?  I am
>scheduled for the CCIE lab in July.  I am not too concern with Cisco
>NDA because I know that most people don't.  I am willing to trade with
>anyone.
>
>Mojo.
>_
>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



passed routing - THANKS!

2001-03-03 Thread Brad Beck

Hi Everyone,

I just wanted to say thanks to all the posters on this list.  I've mostly 
been a lurker on this list, but the knowledge gained from those who do post 
helped me pass BSCN with a 931.  This test was incredibly more difficult 
than both the CCNA and BCMSN tests.  I thought for sure I failed that thing!

take care,
brad


---
Brad Beck
Network Engineer
Macromedia, Inc.


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



line/enable authentication via radius/TACACS+???

2000-11-01 Thread Brad Beck

Hi everybody,

It seems to me that many medium/large networks tend to use radius or tacacs
for router line authentication.  I could be wrong about this, so please
correct me if so.  I'd like to know how a few things are handled in this
type of envrionment:

- What is the main driver in using radius/tacacs+ for line(telnet)
authentication?  Is it for accounting purposes? Is it to prevent the
problems involved with local line passwords such as password changes?  

- From some of my CCO readings, I've learned that AAA can be configured so
that, if radius/tacacs+ authentication is configured for a line,and the
user authenticaion fails(wrong password/username) the enable password will
allow a user router access.  Considering this,  what's to prevent a user
from simply pressing return a couple times then entering the enable
password in order to bypass the sername/password requirement?

- What if the authentication server is inaccessible?  ie.  Part(s) of the
network are down. 

- Related to the previous question, how many authentication servers are
commonly deployed in a given network?

- Finally, do Network/Ops divisions generally run their own authentication
servers, or are existing user databases shared(ie email, etc)?

Basically I'm trying to understand real-world implementations of this, and
I'm finding it hard to do from documentation alone.  

THANKS A LOT!  

ps.  I'd like to say thanks to this list for what I've learned over the
past several months by mostly lurking.  I just recently passed BCMSN with a
945, and a few months ago CCNA with a 925.  Really, thanks.


-brad


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Escape sequence

2000-11-01 Thread Brad Beck

I see.  I've never really been able to figure out how the two differed. I
just knew that if I wanted out of something to hit ctrl-shift-6-x.  

Thanks for the pointer.

-Brad

At 03:18 PM 10/31/00 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>Brad,
>
>I believe that you just need the control-shift-6 part of that.  This is
>important if you happen to be telneting/reverse-telnetting through another
>router to where you are attempting to run the trace.  If you use
>ctrl-shft-6-x, you'll get kicked back to the previous router.  For example
>
>termserv>r1
>Trying r1 (10.1.1.1)... Open
>r1>trace www.groupstudy.com
>Type escape sequence to abort.
>Tracing the route to www.groupstudy.com (208.32.175.78)
>1  *  *  *
>2  *  *  *
>3  *  *  *  [ctrl-shft-6]
>r1>  <--- just takes you back to the CLI
>r1>trace www.groupstudy.com
>Type escape sequence to abort.
>Tracing the route to www.groupstudy.com (208.32.175.78)
>1  *  *  *
>2  *  *  *
>3  *  *  *  [ctrl-shft-6-x]
>termserv><--- kicks you back to the term server
>
>Hope this helps.  At least it'll save time logging back into the router
multiple times trying to run multiple traces.
>
>Matthew C. Sypherd
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>CCNP+Security CCDP CCSE MCSE
>
>
>
>
>
>Brad Beck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@groupstudy.com
>10/30/2000 11:41 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>Please respond to Brad Beck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>Sent by:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>To:   Lists Wizard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "'Cisco group study'"
>  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>cc:
>
>Subject:  Re: Escape sequence
>
>
>control-shift-6 then x
>
>-b
>At 03:26 PM 10/29/00 -0700, Lists Wizard wrote:
>>Hello,
>>what is the escape sequence if I want to stop the router from traceing the
>>path to a destination ? I have tried many keyboard sequences but I failed.
>>
>>Thanks
>>Rover
>>
>>Router#trace 10.1.38.227
>>
>>Type escape sequence to abort.
>>Tracing the route to 10.1.38.227
>>
>>  1  *  *  *
>>  2  *  *  *
>>  3  *  *  *
>>  4  *  *  *
>>  5  *  *  *
>>  6  *  *  *
>>  7  *  *  *
>>  8  *  *  *
>>  9  *  *  *
>> 10  *  *  *
>> 11  *  *  *
>> 12  *  *  *
>> 13  *  *  *
>> 14  *  *  *
>> 15  *  *  *
>> 16  *  *  *
>> 17  *  *  *
>> 18  *  *  *
>>
>>
>>
>>_
>>Do You Yahoo!?
>>Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>>
>>_
>>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>
>_
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Escape sequence

2000-10-30 Thread Brad Beck

control-shift-6 then x

-b
At 03:26 PM 10/29/00 -0700, Lists Wizard wrote:
>Hello,
>what is the escape sequence if I want to stop the router from traceing the
>path to a destination ? I have tried many keyboard sequences but I failed.
>
>Thanks
>Rover
>
>Router#trace 10.1.38.227
>
>Type escape sequence to abort.
>Tracing the route to 10.1.38.227
>
>  1  *  *  *
>  2  *  *  *
>  3  *  *  *
>  4  *  *  *
>  5  *  *  *
>  6  *  *  *
>  7  *  *  *
>  8  *  *  *
>  9  *  *  *
> 10  *  *  *
> 11  *  *  *
> 12  *  *  *
> 13  *  *  *
> 14  *  *  *
> 15  *  *  *
> 16  *  *  *
> 17  *  *  *
> 18  *  *  *
>
>
>
>_
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>_
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Cisco TFTP Server

2000-10-24 Thread Brad Beck


3com acutally gives away a much nicer win32 tftp/syslog client/server.  I
actually saw this running on a machine at Cisco in San Jose, and the
employee who was using it pointed me to the URL.  
It can be found here:
http://support.3com.com/infodeli/swlib/utilities_for_windows_32_bit.htm

-Brad


At 02:23 PM 10/24/00 -0400, Lowell Sharrah wrote:
>http://www.cisco.com/pcgi-bin/tablebuild.pl/tftp
>
>Lowell E. Sharrah
>SBC-DataComm
>517-241-7059 wk
>517-360-0481 pgr
>517-930-1993 cell
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
 "Lopez, Robert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 10/11/00 09:36AM >>>
>Group,
>
>Has anyone experienced the Cisco online testing site...
>http://www.cisco.com/pcgi-bin/colt/ColtLogin.pl?MODULEID=2467&SUBMIT=Take+Te 
>Thanks in advance for any information.  Secondly,  are the Boson test
>engines something to invest in for the CCNP track?
>
>
>
>
>Robert M. Lopez
>Network Planning
>Ann Arbor Data Center
>Pfizer Global Research & Development
>Phone 734-622-3948 Fax 734-622-1690
>
>
>
>
>
>**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html 
>_
>UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html 
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com 
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>_
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Possible phony CCIE

2000-10-23 Thread Brad Beck

It seems rather silly to me that a CCIE would suggest that a Sun box would
"flood the wire with excessive SMB traffic".  I'm not saying this rules
this man out of being CCIE, just that the diagnoses is a poor one coming
from anyone, even if they don't know about FW1.

-Brad


At 12:54 PM 10/23/00 -0700, Nnanna Obuba wrote:
>
>
>Because he does not know about a bug in checkpoint he
>is a phony CCIE? In case you jave forgotten, CCIE
>means
>certified CISCO Internetwork Expert... give the guy a
>break
>
>Nnanna
>
>--- Mark  Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Raul-
>> 
>>  I brought down the local checkpoint firewall by
>> pinging an large number of
>> hosts simultaneously. I asked him (the bogus ccie)
>> why he thought that would
>> bring down the firewall? His reply? "The fact that I
>> pinged more than 50
>> hosts rapid fire caused the NT and Solaris servers
>> on the LAN to start
>> flooding the wire with excessive SMB traffic, and
>> since the firewall saw
>> that much SMB traffic it thought I was an intruder
>> and shut down the
>> interface I was attached to." Real reason: The old
>> Firewall one software had
>> a bug that misallocated memory for packet queues on
>> internal interfaces. My
>> excessive pinging caused the queue to overflow and
>> the software itself
>> crashed. An update fixed the problem. At least that
>> was what the data center
>> manager told me.
>> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
>> Raul F. Fernandez
>> Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 9:57 AM
>> To: Tim O'Brien; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Cisco
>> Subject: Re: Possible phony CCIE
>> 
>> 
>> Dear folks,
>> 
>> I have to agree with Tim on this one. It may have
>> been possible that the
>> person at this site just did not pay enough
>> attention to the question posed
>> or that he may not known the answer. I do not know
>> thew nature of the
>> question. Perhaps Mark could be kind  enough to let
>> us know what the
>> question was or were. Now depending on the nature
>> and difficulty of the
>> question it may justify his not being able to answer
>> it. If he is lying he
>> should be disciplined because he lied and because he
>> has taken for granted
>> all the blood sweat and tears that goes into getting
>> a CCIE. I think too
>> many folks get caught up in the CCIE and forget all
>> the real hard work that
>> goes into it. Basically, if he does not know the
>> answer to a perplexing
>> question he should at least be able to outline a
>> troubleshooting plan to
>> find it.
>> 
>> Raul
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Tim O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Cisco
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Date: Monday, October 23, 2000 8:51 AM
>> Subject: Re: Possible phony CCIE
>> 
>> 
>> >Just because a guy can config a router it does not
>> make him a god. Lets
>> face
>> >it guys, there is nobody out there that knows
>> everything about everything,
>> >and if there is someone that thinks they do, I
>> guarantee there is someone
>> >else out there that knows more than they do.
>> Obviously if this guy is lying
>> >about his CCIE he should be exposed, and after
>> reported it is up to Cisco
>> to
>> >deal with as they see fit.
>> >
>> >.02
>> >
>> >Tim
>> >
>> >- Original Message -
>> >From: "Sam LI" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >To: "Mark Cohen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 6:41 AM
>> >Subject: Re: Possible phony CCIE
>> >
>> >
>> >Well, even some real one behave like this, i come
>> across a few in the the
>> >past
>> >
>> >- Original Message -
>> >From: Mark Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 3:55 PM
>> >Subject: Possible phony CCIE
>> >
>> >
>> >> Greetings-
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> I recently worked on a project with a fellow who
>> claimed to be a CCIE. He
>> >> even gave me his card with the CCIE logo on it.
>> At least I think it is
>> the
>> >> CCIE logo. It is a router symbol surrounded with
>> laurels and has the
>> words
>> >> Cisco Certified Internetwork Engineer circling it
>> as well. After asking
>> >this
>> >> person a few questions, I became suspicious of
>> his credentials due to his
>> >> apparent lack of knowledge of the fundamentals.
>> (I never asked for his
>> >CCIE
>> >> number because I attempted verification only
>> after I left the account). I
>> >> faxed a copy of the business card he gave me
>> (homemade BTW) to someone in
>> >> the CCIE program at Cisco.  She told me the card
>> is bogus and that she
>> >would
>> >> send the card to the Cisco lawyers. That was
>> three months ago and this
>> >> person is STILL working on site there. What do
>> you people think I should
>> >do
>> >> now? Send e-mail to the persons that are
>> contracting him there? He is
>> >> charging a very high bill rate. The people he is
>> working don't have
>> enough
>> >> knowledge to confirm his credentials. Should I
>> let this go? I

Re: 300/1000 scale (correct me if I'm wrong butt...)

2000-10-21 Thread Brad Beck

I'm pretty sure the questions aren't all worth an equal number of points.
I could be wrong though.

-Brad

At 07:13 PM 10/21/00 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Hey Group,
> I always wondered when taking my tests what they meant when they 
>said that there would be a 300/1000 scale. Then somebody on the list 
>explained that you start out with 300 points automatically. This is nice. I 
>just tried to figure out how many could be gotten wrong on the BSCN and came 
>up with something that I don't believe. Follow me on this one...
>
>61 questions, 690/1000 to pass. You start out with 300 so there is basically 
>700 points for a perfect score with 61 questions. Now, 700 points divided by 
>61 questions breaks out to something like 11.48 points per question. Then I 
>take 1000 - 690 and get 310 points. This is how many you can miss and still 
>pass. Finally, I divide that 310 points you can miss, by the number of
points 
>per question (310/11.48) and get this as the number of questions you can
miss 
>and still pass...27.003 (27 basically). 
>
>I may be seeing it wrong in the area where I divide the 700/61 to get the 
>number of points per question. It may be that even though you get 300, you 
>still divide 1000/61, which would give you 16.39 points per question which
in 
>the end would allow you to miss 18.9 (18 basically) questions. This sounds 
>alot more like it.
>
>This confuses me. If my initial calculation is the correct one, what this 
>shows me is that on a test that has only 61 questions, somebody can get 27 
>(almost half) of them wrong and still pass the test. Does this just sound
too 
>easy to anybody else? Am I not understanding that 300/1000 scale thing, or
is 
>this test just soo damn easy? Don't get me wrong, I never go for the
bare 
>minimum. In fact, I don't believe anything under 800 is satisfactory (B 
>basically), I just like to know all factors before a test. Thanks for 
>responses guys/ladies...
>
>Mark Zabludovsky ~ CCNA, CCDA, 1/4-NP
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>  "If you need luck, apparently you're not prepared...Go study!"
>
   
>   ~Mark Zabludovsky~
>
>_
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: T Thomas BSCN, BCMSN - VERY POOR

2000-10-19 Thread Brad Beck

I agree that Ciscopress books are better than other publishers I've seen.
When I was studying for CCNA I bought a book by Global Knowledge titled
"CCNA test yourself practice exams".  This book was terrible.  Many, many
errors.  The Cisco books I've used seem very well put together and at least
edited.

-Brad

At 07:08 PM 10/19/00 -0700, E Aaron Presley wrote:
>Tom Thomas books by Mcgraw Hill are consistently
>VERY POOR quality.  Many mistakes, effort seems
>lacking
>It seems he has pumped out the books quick for McGraw
>Hill to beat cisco press to market and cash in.
>
>I hope that this will serve notice to those pursuing
>this crazy track of computer company certifcations.
>Not to be victimized by these people, stick with
>CISCOPRESS
>
>PS: Read other reviews on these books in groupstudy
>archives and judge for yourself.  This is what
>groupstudy is for, free exchange of info that calls
>out ripoff artists like MG Hill and T Thomas III.
> 
>
>
>__
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Yahoo! Messenger - Talk while you surf!  It's FREE.
>http://im.yahoo.com/
>
>_
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Can you say Studying Simple Silly Certs Stinks

2000-10-18 Thread Brad Beck

I think this topic has come and gone way too many times to be of any use on
this list.  Please take this elsewhere so that those of us who appreciate
this list don't get tired of it because of debates like this one continue
to grind on.

Thank you in advance,
Brad

At 01:54 PM 10/18/00 -0400, Terrence Garrison wrote:
>I think I am noticing that CCNA, CCNP and CCIE
>are of less and less importance because there
>is such a short supply of people, employers no
>better than to ask for a cert ? What do you guys think ?
>_
>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
>
>Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at 
>http://profiles.msn.com.
>
>_
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Switch reboots when a laptop is connected

2000-10-03 Thread Brad Beck

I've heard a couple windows people at my company talk about how the
plug/play features of Win2K go so far as poke at the serial port to check
for devices such as UPS.  I suppose some characters could be sent to the
console which could crash the box  Just a thought..

-Brad


At 10:45 AM 10/3/00 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Has anyone seen an issue with some of the 3500XL, 2924XL, or 2916s where
>they reboot if they are connected to a laptop running Windows 2000 while the
>laptop is booting?  It didn't happen under windows 98, but for some reason
>2000 sends some weird signals out the serial port that causes Cisco switches
>to reboot.  
>
>Henry Malmgren
>Network Engineer
>TManage Inc.
>(512) 794-6531
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>www.tmanage.com
>
>By the way, our legal department wants me to tell you that:
>Privileged/confidential information may be contained in this message.  It is
>not for use or disclosure outside TManage without a written proprietary
>agreement.  If you are not the addressee indicated in this message, or agent
>responsible for delivery, you may not copy or deliver this message to
>anyone.  Please notify the sender as soon as possible and immediately
>destroy this message and its attachments in its entirety.
>You can't say I didn't warn you
>
>**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
>_
>UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
_
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Which switches have inline power

2000-09-13 Thread Brad Beck

A blade is produced for the 6509 which provides in-line power for the Cisco
VoIP phone.  

-Brad

At 07:54 PM 9/13/00 -0700, Dennis Laganiere wrote:
> I can't seem to find on the www.cisco.com site which switches have inline
>power, in otherwords, can power the VoIP phones.  Can anybody let me know of
>send me a link?  Thanks...
> - Dennis
>
>**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
>_
>UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
_
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: what is dark fiber?

2000-09-07 Thread Brad Beck

This sounds more like the distinction between multimode and single mode fiber.

-Brad


At 09:04 AM 9/6/00 -0400, Fomes Iain wrote:
>
> this is a misconception.
>Dark fiber or Dark fibre as we can it here in England.God save the Queen an
>all that is actually a fibre based product that enables long distances to be
>covered.Where as fibre has approximatley a 2km depth,  Dark fibre is able to
>run for much longer lengths.
>i have seen it used for up to 20 30 40 miles
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From:Richard Dennard [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent:05 September 2000 19:53
>> To:  bahadir korkmaz
>> Cc:  Cisco
>> Subject: RE: what is dark fiber?
>> 
>> dark fiber is a term usually used by providers to indicate fiber that does
>> not have light passing over it (unused).
>> 
>> Richard Dennard
>> Network Engineer
>> HY_SPEED_DATA
>> phone 814-260-3966
>> fax 814-274-7370
>> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
>> bahadir korkmaz
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2000 11:04 AM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: what is dark fiber?
>> 
>> 
>> hi.
>> what is dark fiber?
>> i found some sites that says dark fiber means unused fiber.
>> is it so?
>> i think dark fiber must be different then unused fiber.
>> i mean for example. 10gigabit ethernet runs on dark fiber.
>> dark must be something related to bandwidth or wavelength.
>> 
>> if someone knows dark fiber definition i ll be happy.
>> _
>> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
>> 
>> Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
>> http://profiles.msn.com.
>> 
>> ___
>> UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
>> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
>> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> 
>> ___
>> UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
>> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
>> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>___
>UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associate-Announcement.html
_
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: TFTP server

2000-06-20 Thread Brad Beck

Hi there,

The tftp protocol performs reliability checking on its' own in the form of
a CRC check on transfered files.  You are correct in that UDP is an
unreliable protocol.

-Brad 


At 01:43 PM 6/20/00 +0800, BB wrote:
>HI,
>I just want to ask if it is a reliable transfer protocol.
>UDP isn't
>So, how to make sure I have backed up what I want to the tftp server?
>
>BB
>
>""Apoorva S.Malavia"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>> Tftp server is a peice of software that runs on different platforms.
>> It is based on the ftp server concept, except there is no user
>authentication
>> required.
>> I beleive it UDP based.
>> Cisco has a free tftp server for th windows platform, i just am not sure
>abou
>> the exact links.
>>
>>
>> "Sim, CT (Chee Tong)" wrote:
>>
>> > Dear Friends,
>> >
>> > May I ask what is TFTP server, I understand its function, but what is
>that
>> > actually?  Is that a PC?  then how to make a PC become a TFTP server.
>How
>> > does the PC connect to the TFTP server?  how is the connection like?
>> >
>> > Sorry for the stupid question, but I really curious to know
>> >
>> > Thank you very much
>> >
>> > Tong
>> >
>> > ==
>> > De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en
>> > is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht
>> > onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en
>> > de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren.
>> > ==
>> > The information contained in this message may be confidential
>> > and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you
>> > receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents
>> > herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail.
>> >
>> > ==
>> >
>> > ___
>> > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
>> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
>> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > ---
>>
>> ___
>> UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
>> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
>> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> ---
>
>
>___
>UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Async Interfaces

2000-06-16 Thread Brad Beck

Actually, the initial mode is known as "user exec", while the mode which
requires the enable password is "privilaged exec".

Check into the Cisco press CCNA study guide or CCO to verify this.

-Brad


At 07:37 PM 6/11/00 -0700, Joe Martin wrote:
>   Then you can do ENABLE and a password to get to PRIVILIGED  mode.  
>JOE CCIE 5917<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote inmessage
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...   Hi
>group,   I don't understand their meaning of EXEC...can someone also   
>explain this?   David Luong 
>CCNA,Network+,A+,i-Net+ 
>Telecommunications Analyst 
>Insurance Corporation of B.C. 
>Vancouver, B.C CANADA  
> 

___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: ospf

2000-06-15 Thread Brad Beck

Actually it's like this...

The first permited address is 10.11.216.193, then every other odd
decimal...so in the end it's:
10.11.216.193
10.11.216.195
10.11.216.197, etc...

63 = 0  0   1   1   1   1   1   0

Checking the following bits: 128, 64, and 1.  First permited address is 193.

-Brad




10.11.216.192 0.0.0.63



At 10:16 AM 6/15/00 +0800, Sim, CT (Chee Tong) wrote:
>I think the IP range that it allow is from 10.11.216.192 to 10.11.216.255
>
>Can any one tell me whether?
>
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Dennis Ighomereho [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2000 9:53 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: ospf
>
>
>hi,
>could someone explain this to me.on 3500 series switch.There is a statement 
>access-list statement saying
>
>access-list 50 permit 10.11.216.192 0.0.0.63
>
>could you tell me from what ip range does this allow access or how is this 
>worked out.
>
>cheers
>
>
>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
>
>___
>UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>==
>De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en 
>is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht 
>onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en 
>de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. 
>==
>The information contained in this message may be confidential 
>and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you 
>receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents 
>herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail.
>
>
>==
>
>
>___
>UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Odd responses from List Server

2000-06-08 Thread Brad Beck

Actually I'm having this problem.  I remember the list admin mentioning
some filter scripts he was working on.  I suspect that these filters are
not functioning correctly.

-Brad

At 08:47 PM 6/8/00 +0200, ElephantChild wrote:
>On Thu, 8 Jun 2000, John Neiberger wrote:
>
>> For two of my recent postings I've gotten a response from
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]  It thinks my posting to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is a
>> set of commands and it's telling me that it doesn't understand any of it. 
>> It's happened twice in two days.
>> 
>> Anyone else having this odd problem?
>
>No.
>
>> Anyone know how to solve this odd problem??  :-)
>
>Put 'end' on a line by itself on the first line of your posting.
>
>-- 
>Bungee jumping and skydiving are for wimps. If you want to experience
>true gut-wrenching terror, have children. --Dusty Rhoades.
>
>___
>UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: PIX Firewall show connection counters

2000-06-07 Thread Brad Beck

Hi,

I know that if I change the global pool in any way or add/delete static
translations, I will experience random problems in translations.  These
problems can occur within the the range of the global pool, as well as the
range for my static mappings.  The only way I've found to work around these
problems is to "clear xlate".  I tried at one point to "clear xlate global
x.x.x.x" or "clear xlate inside x.x.x.x" in order to only clear the changed
range, but this doesn't seem to work.  "clear xlate" seems to be the only
fix.  

Is this what you are experiencing?
-Brad

At 01:05 PM 6/6/00 +0300, Bishara, Anan wrote:
>
>
>I am facing the same problem. My exchange server stop receiving mail from
>outside. When I do an nslookup for my domain from and outside DNS, it gives
>request time out. When I do clear xlate, it works for sometimes and then
>stops. I tried upgrading the version to 5.1 but still the same problem. If
>anybody have  a suggestions, it will really help to get rid this headache. 
>
>Regards,
>Anan
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Astbury, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2000 11:21 AM
>To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
>Subject: RE: PIX Firewall show connection counters
>
>
>We have a similar problem at our site - it seems as if the PIX just stops
>resolving DNS.
>Our exchange server is no longer able to send mail externally due to DNS
>lookup failures.
>We've looked at all the possibilities, but normally a reboot will fix the
>problem.
>
>We have added extra memory to the PIX, and also upgraded the Firmware - but
>we can't seem to get to the bottom of this !!
>If anyone out there has seen this or knows of a potential fix, I would be
>most grateful of some feedback.
>
>regards,
>Phil
>
>
>
>
>
>   -Original Message-
>   From:   Apoorva S.Malavia [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>   Sent:   06 June 2000 05:25
>   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   Subject:Re: PIX Firewall show connection counters
>
>   I need to see the config on the fw. 
> 
>
>   "Bishara, Anan" wrote: 
>
>   Hello everybody, This maybe of topic of this message but it
>is related to it 
>   somehow. I have a DNS in my DMZ zone, I am facing problem is
>that DNS stop 
>   resolving names after a while and I have to clear Xlate,
>where it will work 
>   for a while and then stops again. Anybody have any
>suggestion or face this 
>   problem? 
>   Regards, 
>   Anan 
>
>   -Original Message- 
>   From: Apoorva S.Malavia [ ] 
>   Sent: Monday, June 05, 2000 9:36 PM 
>   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>   Subject: Re: PIX Firewall show connection counters 
>
>   more precisely 
>   clear xlate * 
>
>   Mark Holloway wrote: 
>
>   > Yes, "clear xlate" is what you want.  Clear xlate will
>knock people off 
>   but 
>   > more than likely they will "refresh" their browser if it's
>web base.  FTP 
>   > connection may timeout and telnet session will drop.  You
>said "you might 
>   as 
>   > well reboot if you're gonna clear xlate" - but the PIX
>takes about a 
>   minute 
>   > to reboot as opposed to clear xlate being an instant
>function.  In an 
>   > environment where I work we have 5000+ users on the inside
>interface using 
>   > the outside (internet) and dmz interfaces.  A reboot would
>get me fired! 
>   > 
>   > Regards, 
>   > Mark 
>   > 
>   > - Original Message - 
>   > From: Chuck Larrieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
>   > To: Jorge Rodriguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Pete Ruttman
>(adminpr) 
>   > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
>   > Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2000 9:32 PM 
>   > Subject: RE: PIX Firewall show connection counters 
>   > 
>   > > I don't have a pix manual handy, but if memory serves,
>the command is 
>   > clear 
>   > > xlate 
>   > > 
>   > > I'm sure you all will let me know if I'm wrong :-> 
>   > > 
>   > > Chuck 
>   > > 
>   > > -Original Message- 
>   > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [
>] On Behalf Of 
>   > > Jorge Rodriguez 
>   > > Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2000 7:21 PM 
>   > > To: Pete Ruttman (adminpr); [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>   > > Subject: Re: PIX Firewall show connection counters 
>   > > 
>   > > Did you try " Clear Counters"  ? 
>   > > 
>   > > 
>   > > - Original Message - 
>   > > From: "Pete Ruttman (adminp

RE: Cisco Certified Salaries

2000-06-04 Thread Brad Beck

That amount of money is not a lot for the Peninsula or South Bay...

-Brad


At 04:49 PM 6/4/00 -0700, Sam Adams wrote:
>3com in Milpitas pays that much?  Dang..
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
>Ryan Ward
>Sent: Sunday, June 04, 2000 1:25 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: Cisco Certified Salaries
>
>
>FYI...
>
>I know 2 guys both are fresh MCSE's and have 0 experience and they both got
>jobs at 2 different companies, each are paying them 75k+ a year. I also have
>a 3rd friend that has a job with 3Com, with only a MCSE and very little
>experience, entry level came in at 70k and since got a couple of raises.
>
>-Ryan
>
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
>Brad Ellis
>Sent: Sunday, June 04, 2000 12:06 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Cisco Certified Salaries
>
>
>Chad,
>
>With 3 months of experience what do you expect???  $150k/yr?  You still need
>to "prove" yourself.  No offense, but the certs you have aren't very hard to
>get.  If you get overtime, that is a pretty cool...a lot of places won't pay
>OT these days.  Give yourself a year or two in the business.  After that
>experience, plus a CCNP you should be closer to $60-$70k /yr.
>
>Keep chugging along!
>-Brad
>""Chad A. Simmons, MCSE"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>001e01bfce57$292af160$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:001e01bfce57$292af160$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>> I am a consultant for a small consulting firm. I have about 3 months of
>> (real experience. I used to do small consulting jobs on the side)
>> experience. I have earned my MCP, MCSE, CCNA, and CCDA. I am currently
>> persuing my CCNP. I make only 29,000 a year plus overtime. This seems low
>to
>> me. I was wondering what anyone in a similar situation is making.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Chad,  MCP, MCSE, CCNA, CCDA
>>
>> ___
>> UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
>> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
>> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> ---
>
>
>___
>UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>___
>UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>___
>UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Hello packets

2000-05-27 Thread Brad Beck

I beleive it's ten by default in OSPF, not sure about EIGRP.

-Brad CCNA

At 01:40 PM 5/28/00 +0800, Jacques Lee wrote:
>Dear all,
>
>I'm a little bit confused with the update time interval for hello
>packets sent in OSPF and EIGRP. by default, is it 10s or 5s ?
>
>Thanks
>
>--
>¨Ó¦Û¸t¦ã¦ÌÀs¬Pªº¤p©ú©ú¶W¤H
>
>___
>UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: ipv6 tunnels available, leads to all sorts of fun stuff

2000-05-15 Thread Brad Beck

Interesting  I'm curious how you can have a /127 address, since this
allows you only a network and broadcast, but no host bits

Am I missing something??

-Brad

Brad Beck, CCNA
WAN Administrator
Diva Systems


> ipv6 address 3FFE:B00:4007:C12::6/127



At 10:06 PM 5/15/00 -0500, neal rauhauser wrote:
>   I've colocated a Cisco 7120 at pensat.com and I am working with an
>engineer there to get ipv6 tunnels working. I've got half a dozen set up
>but we need to hit 40+ before they qualify for the next size block of
>IPv6 numbers.
>
>
>   IPv6 is interesting but there are some other goodies that come with
>this connection as well. 
>
>  We've got the 7120 set up with enough ram to do BGP and we'll be
>turning that on shortly. I've got a 7505 with enough guts to do that job
>as well and I am planning on using it to give people hands on in
>something like a production BGP environment. I think the 7120 will be
>accessible but only in login and not enable mode.
>
>   I am also in the process of installing an ISDN dial lab at work that
>will be accessible only via IPv6. Its got an AS5200, an Adtran TSu 600
>for analog calls, an Atlas 800 to do ISDN switching, and some Cisco
>1003s as clients. This should be ready within the next month or so.
>
>   The initial config is not very difficult - you just need a CCO login
>so you can get the IPv6 software for your router or I can set you up
>with the 7120 image if that is your platform - its not released for beta
>yet but a kind Cisco developer 'loaned' me a copy. Once you have your
>software this is about all you need to get started.
>
>! this is really all that is required besides the single default ipv6
>route
>interface Tunnel95
> description ipv6 link to Optimum Data Switching Lab 3ffe:b00:4007:5/64
> no ip address
> no ip directed-broadcast
> ipv6 enable
> ipv6 address 3FFE:B00:4007:C12::6/127
> tunnel source 209.58.21.221
> tunnel destination 24.3.235.22
> tunnel mode ipv6ip
>
>  If this is something you are interested in please email me at
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>___
>UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Cisco VPN Performance Characteristics

2000-05-10 Thread Brad Beck

I would search CCO on "pptp" and "ipsec" and "vpn."  I was able to find
good performance info, specific to what you need.  There's actually a FAQ
page in there somewhere.  I have these sites bookmarked at work, but not
with me now.

hope this helps,
Brad Beck, CCNA


At 05:17 PM 5/10/00 -0700, Tim wrote:
>I am looking for published VPN Performance Characteristics Data on Cisco
>17xx, 26xx, 36xx, and Pix Firewalls. I have found little real info, anyone
>have any specs or selection criteria to select models with??
>
>Thanks,
>Tim
>
>
>___
>UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]