RE: Which Job Should I Take?
Pre-IPO indicates the company has plans to go public (ie sell shares of the company on the stock market). This topic should also probably be moved to the jobs list. As far as the two job options, I'd chose the opportunity that will allow you to work with the technology you want to work with. These two jobs are very different from each other. I'd think the major decision would be "do I want to focus/pursue VoX technology?" That should make your decision fairly easy as in my experience you will either love the Voice arena or you will hate it. I'd say getting involved with the Voice arena has a high chance of getting you off the RS studies. But on the other hand the Voice arena is getting huge! Opportunities are popping up left and right for people focused on Cisco AVVID technologies. I'd evaluate your interest in Voice and then make your decision based on that. Another side note, if you determine that you are in fact interested in pursuing Voice technology then I wouldn't worry about the company being pre-IPO. If they fail, and the department you work in gets cut, you will find getting another job dealing with Voice to be no problem. Remember, hours and dress are petty concerns compared to what you actually "do" for a living. HTH Best Regards, --Mike -Original Message- From: Ole Drews Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 10:22 AM To: 'Traceroute'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Which Job Should I Take? I know what I would do, but that should not influate your decision. We all have different goals, and if you have a family to support, you should talk with them first before you make your choice. With a wife and kids there's big difference from working 9-5 to 1-midnight. You'll get used to the business dress very quickly, so don't let that scare you too much. A title is "just" a title, but maybe they would offer you a better one at your current job if you deside to go with the new one. I have no idea what pre-ipo means, so I can't guide you in that matter. Hth, Ole Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.CiscoKing.com NEED A JOB ??? http://www.oledrews.com/job -Original Message- From: Traceroute [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 11:53 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Which Job Should I Take? I was wondering if you all could share your opinions with me. I have a = choice of two jobs to take listed below. Both are an increase in pay of = about 9k. 1. My current Job: They are going to title me "network engineer" working = 4 10 hour days 1 pm to midnight ( I love the hours) , but we work with = cabletron, checkpoint and cisco. We have a campus and WAN support = responsibility. Sometimes it's a bit slow when nothing is happening and = I may get some "Win NT" duties, yuck I would have sunday, monday and = tuesdays off and could possibly get some good side gigs. Last but not = least, it's business casual. 2. New Job Offer: I will be titled a "network administrator" working 8 = to 5 monday through friday ( I hate waking up early ), but getting = exposure to ATM, Voice over IP and voice over ATM. Lots of MC 3810s = about 50 or so with conections all over the US. One thing is for sure is = there are NT admins to handle the "Win NT" issues, I really want to = graduate from the NT support world for good. This company is also = pre-ipo and although they are a huge company, this is a new "division" = and pre-ipo makes me nervous because I have a family to support. One = cool thing is that they are a cisco gold partner. One bad thing is that = they are business dress, yes the whole tie thing. The pre-ipo thing = makes me nervous because they say "yea when we go public, lots of the = big wigs will be rich"... Does this mean new management takeovers = etc...?? Anyway, thanks for any input... _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BGP Tutorial--anyone know a good one?
http://joe.lindsay.net/bgp.html There is a Tutorial link half way down the page that presents a slide show tutorial. I've also found this link to be good. http://www.netaxs.com/~freedman/bgp/bgp.html In addition, Cisco's site has a ton of info. Here's a few links. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/459/14.html http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/ip_c /ipcprt2/1cdbgp.htm http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/ics/icsbgp4.htm Best Regards, --Mike -Original Message- From: Leonardo Silva - Tecnologia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 9:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: BGP Tutorial--anyone know a good one? Hello! I'm looking for a BGP tutorial. If anyone know one it will help a lot. Tks. Leonardo Silva _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: % Warning: cannot change link type
That's correct. The only two commands that you have to reload a router, are when changing the ISDN switch type and changing subinterfaces from point-to-point to point-to-multipoint or vice versa. At least the only two that I've heard of. I'd be interested if someone has heard of any others. --Mike -Original Message- From: Maccubbin, Duncan To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 12/13/00 7:47 AM Subject: RE: % Warning: cannot change link type then tried to delete it and bring it back up as a point-to-point. You will get this error with 11.x IOS. Delete the interface and restart the router. That should enable you to change the frame type to multipoint. Good luck, Duncan -Original Message- From: les flack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 8:56 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: % Warning: cannot change link type Help, I have a 3600 @ 11.3 which is running as a frame switch on some ports and I am trying to configure some of the other ports as routed point-to-point sub-ints. But when configuring the second sub int I get the following. frsw1(config)#int s0/0.1 point-to-point frsw1(config-subif)#exit frsw1(config)#int s0/0.2 point-to-point % Warning: cannot change link type Which results in the following configuration interface Serial0/0 no ip address no ip mroute-cache encapsulation frame-relay ! interface Serial0/0.1 point-to-point no arp frame-relay ! interface Serial0/0.2 multipoint no arp frame-relay Any ideas? Les _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Frame-relay URLs
Cisco's site has a lot of good Frame Relay info, obviously. Nevertheless, I've listed a few of my favorites that may prove to be useful. Best of luck, --Mike http://www.nwfusion.com/research/framerelay.html?nf#search http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/779/smbiz/service/knowledge/wan/subifs.htm http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/qos_ c/qcprt4/qcdpolsh.htm http://www.raleigh.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr/BOOKS/EZ305800/CCONTENTS http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/itg_v1/tr1918.htm http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/125/13.html http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios113ed/113ed_cr/w an_c/wcfrelay.htm#xtocid2343228 http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12cgcr/qos_c /qcpart4/qcfrts.htm -Original Message- From: Ware, Balasaheb To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 12/13/00 1:54 AM Subject: Re: Frame-relay URLs Can anybody suggest some links or URLs on Frame-relay for detailed study including basics , configuration. Thanks in advance. Bala Senior Software Specialist ( E-Infra) Digital Equipment (I) Limited Digital India, III, Floor, Khanija Bhavan, # 49, Race Course Road, Bangalore 560 022. India Tel: 91 80 2268003, x 4004 Fax: 91 80 2268044 email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] website: www.digitalindiasw.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BGP
OSPF Network Design Solutions by Tom Thomas -Original Message- From: Pierre-Alex To: Andre Fecteau; Cisco Sent: 12/11/00 11:05 PM Subject: RE: BGP I bought it myself yesterday. Quite a book! I wonder if there is the equivalent for Frame Relay and OSPF. Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: Andre Fecteau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 11:55 AM To: Pierre-Alex Subject: Re: BGP I of course haven't finished reading it yet, but so far I like it! Andre Pierre-Alex wrote: How do you like it? -Original Message- From: Andre Fecteau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2000 3:18 PM To: Pierre-Alex Subject: Re: BGP I bought the book by Halabi. thank you, Andre Pierre-Alex wrote: Try this: BGP: - Overview http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/ito_doc/bgp.htm - case studies http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/459/bgp-toc.html - Using for Interdomain Routing http://cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/ics/icsbgp4.htm - Technical Tips http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/459/18.html Regards, Pierre -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andre Fecteau Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 7:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: BGP Hello, Does anyone have any suggestions for a good CBT or Book or something to learn more about BGP? I read a book on BGP, but it talked about confederations, communities and bgp in general. The ACRC book I have only grazes the subject I was hoping for a book or something that would go more in depth. EX: Confederations, Commands, Filters, Regular Expressions, etc... Can anyone give me some good suggestions? I of course am looking for material concerning Cisco BGP configuration! Any suggestions are welcome!!! Thank You, Andre _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Andre Fecteau Unix Software Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] CNE3, 4 CCNA _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DLSw help
I'm no DLSW expert, and don't currently have access to any routers. But it looks to me like your defining a virtual ring group, but fail to map your remote-peer to this ring group. Try: === source-bridge ring-group 1234 source-bridge local-peer peer-id 137.20.103.2 source-bridge remote-peer 1234 remote-peer tcp 137.20.100.1 dlsw bridge-group 1 int e0 ip address 137.20.40.1 255.255.255.0 bridge-group 1 no shut bridge 1 protocol ieee Either way I'm interested in the outcome. Best Regards, --Mike -Original Message- From: Hubert Pun [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 7:18 PM To: Cisco Study Group Subject: DLSw help Here is the config between two router with Ethernet interfaces for DLSw. (The other site is just a mirror image). When I perform a "show dlsw peer", the state is CONNECT However, "sh dlsw reachability " and "show dlsw circuits " is empty. Also, "show dlsw capabilities " has " reachable mac addresses : none" All the interfaces on the network has connectivity to each other, and there is no access list. Thanks in advanced === source-bridge ring-group 1234 dlsw local-peer peer-id 137.20.103.2 dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 137.20.100.1 dlsw bridge-group 1 int e0 ip address 137.20.40.1 255.255.255.0 bridge-group 1 no shut bridge 1 protocol ieee _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Napster block
Websense is another such product. -Original Message- From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 08, 2000 9:29 AM To: Eddie Parra; Patrick Bass; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Napster block As part of some research I have been doing to address some issues I have with a particular customer security design, I've been spending a bit of time at www.trusecure.com , and the related interests Information Security Magazine and the ICSA test labs. What I have read there leads me to believe that it is damn near impossible to enforce any kind of real complex security policy on a purely hardware based firewall. Too many bad things are starting to happen using ports 20, 21, 25, 53, and 80 - all ports that in general must be left open for legitimate company web use. For good reasons and evil, app developers are now writing their apps to use these ports, rather than leave them for their intended purposes. There are a couple of companies that offer server based software that inspect and block forbidden sites and content. I believe one of the companies offering such a product is WebSecure. Sorry, I can't find my literature that I picked up at Networkers. But the point is that in order to stop any number of services that violate policy, it is no longer enough to try to block a couple of ports. Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Eddie Parra Sent: Friday, December 08, 2000 8:52 AM To: Patrick Bass; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Napster block How did you do that? Napster isn't port based... Napster can use ANY TCP port? You can set the Napster client to port 80 (HTTP) and it works fine. -Eddie -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Patrick Bass Sent: Friday, December 08, 2000 9:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Napster block Which firewall are you using? I've blocked my users from napster using the PIX outbound command. ""Dave Malik"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... htmlDIVDoes anyone know what TCP or UDP ports need to be blocked on a firewall to prevent users on a network from accessing Napster??/DIV DIVnbsp;/DIV DIVAny comments would be appreciated./DIV DIVnbsp;/DIV DIVRegards,/DIV DIVDave/DIV DIVnbsp;/DIVbr clear=allhrGet more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : a href="http://explorer.msn.com"http://explorer.msn.com/abr /p/html _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Publishing Date?
The last time I spoke to him he said he was doing the final edits on the book. Amazon lists it as March 2001 and they are generally correct, as the Editor's of the book are sure to keep Amazon and such updated with release dates. --Mike -Original Message- From: Adam Hickey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 8:19 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Publishing Date? Anyone know when Doyle is going to publish Vol 2? Adam Hickey [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Publishing Date?
I don't know "who" it will differ from, but I know "how" it will differ from volume one. It covers BGP, multicasting, etc. -Original Message- From: Newton, James A. (AIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 12:25 PM To: 'Adam Hickey'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Publishing Date? Does anyone know who it will differ from volume one? -Original Message- From: Adam Hickey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 10:19 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Publishing Date? Anyone know when Doyle is going to publish Vol 2? Adam Hickey [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: newbie question on Frame Relay!!
jw, When using Frame Relay the router will have: - a physical access circuit (this is the circuit between the router and the Frame Relay provider, i.e. T1) - a PVC or SVC (this is the "virtual" circuit through the Frame Relay cloud to the other router) The physical access circuits can be different for each router. However, a PVC connected between Router A and Router B will be the same speed. I think you may be confusing the two types of circuits. Example: Router A (main branch router) can have a single T1 to the Frame Relay provider (CO). This would be the Physical Access Circuit. Router A could then have multiple PVC mappings, let's say 256k each, to multiple branch office routers (i.e. Rtr B, Rtr C, Rtr D, Rtr E, Rtr F, etc.). All of these branch offices may have 512k physical access circuits to the Frame Relay cloud, but it's the PVC's that will have the same transmission rate (256k each) back to Router A. Traffic shaping comes in handy when you have multiple PVC's that basically oversubscribe your T1 (meaning the cumulative amount of PVC's, in bps, is more than the bps of the physical access circuit of Router A). Traffic shaping allows you to keep from oversubscribing your central router by throttling the amount of traffic transmitted by all of the other branch offices. Hope this helps. Best Regards, --Mike -Original Message- From: jeongwoo park To: Groupstudy Sent: 12/1/00 1:12 PM Subject: newbie question on Frame Relay!! Hi all I have a quick question. On the traffic between central router and branch office router on frame relay, how could central router's connection rate to FR cloud be different from branch office router's connection rate to FR cloud? I could understand if cloud had traffic congestion. But when there are no traffic congestions, how could they be different? These two routers are using same mechanism, Frame Relay, which gives relatively high-speed transfer rate. I happened to ask myself this question while I was reading about FR traffic shaping. Traffic shaping could be useful under this situation. ( according to the book) Could anyone give clear answer? I appreciate your reply. jw __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. http://shopping.yahoo.com/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CID or Core Tests?
Actually the CID 4.0 course is about to debut in web based/e-learning format. The courseware should come out fairly soon after that. I was actually communicating with the Product Manager for the CID course and was going to sit in the beta class, but it was cancelled as their focus had changed to the web format. I'd suppose that the CID 4.0 exam would be developed a few months after the course is developed. --Mike -Original Message- From: Priscilla Oppenheimer To: Mike McDaniel; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11/9/00 12:28 PM Subject: Re: CID or Core Tests? CID isn't much like DCN. CID expects advanced technology expertise, especially in legacy protocols. CID does not have any case studies and only a few "methodology" questions. It mostly has strangely-worded questions about Cisco solutions to problems network engineers face when growing and enhancing enterprise networks. Bottom line: I think it would be hard to pass CID if you don't have the knowledge to pass the other core CCDP tests. Also, if you wait on CID, maybe you'll be able to take a test that isn't ancient. I haven't heard that Cisco is updating CID, but I would think that they must be. Priscilla At 10:04 PM 11/8/00, Mike McDaniel wrote: I have been a fly on the wall for some time. I have been able to find the answers to most of my questions from the archives or current threads, but this one has me stumped. I have had my CCNA for about a year and just recently passed the DCN test. keeping in mind I wish to complete CCNP/DP certifications, my questions is as follows. Should I sit the CID test and get that out of the way while the DCN info is fresh, or should I take the core tests to prepare for the CID? I'm leaning towards CID, but would like feedback from those who have been there. TIA, Mike _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Anybody else take the CCIE Security beta test?
yes -Original Message- From: Arthur Stewart To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11/8/00 1:03 PM Subject: Anybody else take the CCIE Security beta test? _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ccie security exam
The new CCIE Security exam is in fact 351-018. When I scheduled the exam I placed a phone call as it was not listed on the web site. The other test is a recertification test only for those who've passed the CCIE written/lab and need to recertify. It's not the same as the new 351-018. Once the new beta expires the real exam will probably come out in about 2 months once they've evaluated all the beta scores and comments. I took the CCIE Security test on Sunday and didn't believe it was nearly as difficult as I had anticipated. --Mike -Original Message- From: John Green To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11/6/00 2:42 PM Subject: ccie security exam 351-018 (Security Qualification Exam)was the number that was mentioned in this list for cisco security beta exam. I checked up the cisco site and it confirms that : * The Security beta will only be available from October 20, 2000 to November 10, 2000. but in the prometric web site under the cisco certifications i see only 350-009 as CCIE security recertification exam. Please let me know if the ccie security recert exam is same as the above beta mentioned. If you would know as to which exam is the one that closely matches the 350-018 exam ? thanks all john __ Do You Yahoo!? Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. All in one Place. http://shopping.yahoo.com/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Committed burst Excess burst
Let me attempt to explain it: There are three components to Frame Relay traffic shaping and the Frame Relay standard for discarding packets, although not often used in producion Frame Relay environments: Bc = Committed Burst Be = Excessive Burst Tc = Time Interval The Bc is similar to that of the CIR except it is an "amount" of data, represented in bits, whereas the CIR is an amount of data transmitted per second. The Be is also represented as an "amount" of data, represented in bits. The Tc is the time interval in which this process will take place. Now for the process: As frames are received by the Frame Relay switch it uses an algorithm known as the leacky bucket algorith, similar to ATM, to track and monitor the amount of data being sent from a DLCI. Note: This entire process takes place within a specific amount of time, known as the Tc. Once the Tc has expired, the process is repeated for the next amount of data. Think of the Bc and Be as buffers for the frames. As the data is received by the Frame Relay switch from a specific DLCI it will fill up the Bc buffer first. All packets after the Bc fill up the Be buffer and are marked as DE (Discard Eligible). After the Be is filled, the frames are discarded until the Tc expires. The process is then repeated. Hope this clarifies things. Feel free to send me an e-mail if you need/want further clarification. I've also got a Visio diagram that illustrates this process. Best Regards, --Mike -Original Message- From: John lay To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11/2/00 1:56 AM Subject: Committed burst Excess burst Guys, I have a question regarding Frame Relay traffic shapping. I am try to understand the difference between the Committed Burst and the Excess Burst. I have been reading the BCRAN training material for that part, but the difference is not clear enough till now. Any simple claification on this issue is highly appreciated. Thanks in advance. ___ Say Bye to Slow Internet! http://www.home.com/xinbox/signup.html _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How to turn it off
"u all" = "undebug all" if you are running any kind of OSPF debug process that you want to turn off. -Original Message- From: Shahid Muhammad Shafi To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10/27/00 4:27 PM Subject: How to turn it off I m constantly getting some error messages from ospf updates. i m working for those but how can i shut this message what command = Shahid Muhammad Shafi MSc Telecommunications Candidate University of Colorado Boulder BSEE(GIKI),MCSE+I,CNA,CCNA,CCNP,NNCAS Please help feed hungry people worldwide http://www.hungersite.com/ A small thing each of us can do to help others less fortunate than ourselves __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Messenger - Talk while you surf! It's FREE. http://im.yahoo.com/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCIE Security
For those interested in pursuing the CCIE Security, Cisco is offering the beta exam (351-018) via Prometric. It is offered from October 20th - November 10th. The cost is $50. The lab is in development. As the blueprint is not listed on Cisco's site, you may want to check out the blueprint for the Security Recertification exam (350-009). Multiservices and Network Management betas are coming soon. Best Regards, --Mike _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Higher than CCIE...
Interesting idea. However, there are more than "3" CCIE certifications. CCIE RS CCIE WAN Switching CCIE ISP Dial CCIE SNA-IP CCIE Design (as of 7/10/00) CCIE Security (in development) CCIE Multiservices (made this one up, but I'm sure it's soon to come) Therefore, there are currently 5 CCIE certs available with one more coming soon and a possible 7th available in the near future. So anyone that could pass all of these labs, ...well, has WAY too much time on their hands. ; ) ...and probably could rewrite the Cisco IOS to work better. By the time someone passes all of these CCIE certs there will be even more new certs (ie CCIE Management, CCIE havenolife, CCIE brainfried, etc) --Mike -Original Message- From: Generation Cisco To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 8/26/00 11:56 PM Subject: Higher than CCIE... Hey Group, I was pondering this thought. If the rate of CCIE's is rising at a fast pace than I think it would be cool if Cisco created a new cert. The way to obtain this one would be to pass all three CCIE tests. From what I know there is only one person in the world who has all three... I think his name is Brendan Ta or something. They could name the cert: CCID (Cisco certified internetwork director), or something like (and this is my favorite): CCIG (Cisco certified internetwork guru) :) Don't think they would use that one though, :) This type of cert would, in my eyes, deem you as a true master of the matrix, if you know what I mean...just a though. Maybe we can get some good responses on this one...Have a good one group. P.S. I would like if Priscilla O. and Todd L. could also comment on this topic...thanks. :) Mark Zabludovsky ~ CCNA, CCDA E-mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~Internetwork Essentials~ "Complete Solutions for Complex Networks" ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
