RE: Status for CCIE if passed only written [7:2557]
That is incorrect. This passage is directly from the Cisco web page on the CCIE lab: Candidates must attempt the CCIE Lab exam within one year of passing the CCIE Qualification exam. As long as a candidate attempts the CCIE Lab at least once every 12 months, the candidate may take up to three years to pass the Lab Exam. However, if a candidate has not passed the CCIE Lab exam within three years of passing the written exam, he or she must retake the CCIE Qualification exam before the candidate will be allowed to schedule the Lab exam again. You have to take the lab w/in 1 year of the written, but you have three years to pass the lab, as long as you take it once a year. Here is the link if you want more details: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ccie_program/policies.html Jason Coleman - CCNP, CCDP Customer Engineer -Original Message- From: Lupi, Guy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 9:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:RE: Status for CCIE if passed only written [7:2557] You have to pass the lab within one year of passing the written test, or you lose eligibility and must take the written test again. -Original Message- From: Israel Lima [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 10:08 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Status for CCIE if passed only written [7:2557] If u pass the written and then do not schedule or do not pass the LAB, do you loose the CCIE candidate status? What about if you were CCNP, do you loose your CCNP too? Please advise thank you Israel FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=2565t=2557 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IOS VER [7:2283]
What 2900XL are you working with. I just did a SH VERS on a 2916M and is showed everything. I was in user mode when I ran the command as well. Jason Coleman - CCNP, CCDP Customer Engineer -Original Message- From: Tariq Bin Azad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 11:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:IOS VER [7:2283] Hello everybody. How to check IOS ver in catalyst 2900 XL switches ??? Sh version can not show me IOS version in user mode. Tariq FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=2289t=2283 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RIP Updates [7:2270]
My understanding is that when you enable RIP, it will broadcast the route table out all interfaces where IP is running. The network statement is used to designate which networks are added to the route table. Example: E1 = 10.1.1.1 /8 E2 = 11.1.1.1 /8 E3 = 192.168.1.1 /24 Router rip Network 10.0.0.0 Network 11.0.0.0 The route table will contain the 10.0.0.0 /8 and 11.0.0.0 /8 networks and NOT the 192.168.1.1 /24 network. However the route table will be broadcast out all 3 Ethernet ports. If you do not want the table broadcast out a certain port, then you have to use the passive-interface command. Jason Coleman - CCNP, CCDP Customer Engineer -Original Message- From: James Haynes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 10:47 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:RIP Updates [7:2270] I'm currently having a discussion with a fellow employee who passed the CCIE Written about a year ago. Has no plans to take the lab, but that's neither here no there. He claims that when RIP is enabled on a router it floods it's updates out all interfaces on the router by default. I was of the impression that the updates are only broadcast out interfaces that have ip addresses in the same major network as the network command when configuring RIP. For example: A router with four interfaces (addresses made up) E0 130.10.12.1 E1 130.10.13.1 S0 130.10.20.1 S1 170.23.15.1 To0 no ip address, but up for bridging. If I configure RIP as: router rip network 130.10.0.0 then E0,E1,and S0 will send Rip updates out those interfaces, but S1, and To0 interfaces will not. Is this correct? I've been looking through some of my books and on CCO and from what I gather RIP broadcasts a RIP Request Message on each RIP-enabled interface and receives a RIP Response message from a neighboring RIP router that includes that routers routing table. Are the RIP-enabled interfaces those interfaces in the same major network as the network command? Would a router running RIP on the far side of a connection on S1 send a request if it's network was specified in that routers RIP process causing the local router to send an update out the S1 interface? If anyone knows or can point me to the appropriate place for the information I'd appreciate it. -- James Haynes Network Architect Cendant IT A+,MCSE,CCNA,CCDA,CCNP,CCDP FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=2292t=2270 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RIP Updates [7:2270]
You guys are correct. I continued to try and find a doc that supported my
understanding only to find that I was wrong.
We setup a lab environment with the following setup.
E1 = 192.168.1.1 /24
S0/0 = 10.1.1.1 /8
Router Rip
Network 10.0.0.0
Debug ip rip
The debug trace shows RIP updates only being sent out the S0/0 port.
Sorry for misleading anyone, but as it was stated earlier, you learn
something new every day!
Jason Coleman - CCNP, CCDP
Customer Engineer
-Original Message-
From: James Haynes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 2:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: RIP Updates [7:2270]
That's what I thought. I'll try doing a test at home on my
setup and see
what it yields.
--
James Haynes
Network Architect
Cendant IT
A+,MCSE,CCNA,CCDA,CCNP,CCDP
EA Louie wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
If anyone has a router to do debugs on, please check this.
The Cisco
documentation says that it only sends out RIP updates on
the networks (and
thus, interfaces) indicated as part of router rip, which
makes perfect
sense
to me.
from
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12cgcr/np1_c
/1cprt1/1crip.htm
comes
RIP sends updates to the interfaces in the specified
networks. If an
interface's network is not specified, it will not be
advertised in any RIP
update.
So, I believe James is correct, based on the
documentation.
-e-
- Original Message -
From: Coleman, Jason
To:
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 10:56 AM
Subject: RE: RIP Updates [7:2270]
My understanding is that when you enable RIP, it will
broadcast the
route
table out all interfaces where IP is running. The
network statement is
used
to designate which networks are added to the route
table.
Example:
E1 = 10.1.1.1 /8
E2 = 11.1.1.1 /8
E3 = 192.168.1.1 /24
Router rip
Network 10.0.0.0
Network 11.0.0.0
The route table will contain the 10.0.0.0 /8 and
11.0.0.0 /8 networks
and
NOT the 192.168.1.1 /24 network. However the route
table will be
broadcast
out all 3 Ethernet ports. If you do not want the table
broadcast out a
certain port, then you have to use the passive-interface
command.
Jason Coleman - CCNP, CCDP
Customer Engineer
-Original Message-
From: James Haynes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 10:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RIP Updates [7:2270]
I'm currently having a discussion with a fellow
employee
who passed the
CCIE Written about a year ago. Has no plans to take the
lab,
but that's
neither here no there. He claims that when RIP is
enabled on
a router it
floods it's updates out all interfaces on the router by
default. I was of
the impression that the updates are only broadcast out
interfaces that have
ip addresses in the same major network as the network
command when
configuring RIP.
For example:
A router with four interfaces (addresses made up)
E0 130.10.12.1
E1 130.10.13.1
S0 130.10.20.1
S1 170.23.15.1
To0 no ip address, but up for bridging.
If I configure RIP as:
router rip
network 130.10.0.0
then E0,E1,and S0 will send Rip updates out those
interfaces, but S1, and
To0 in
RE: AS5300 Async Dial-up Connectivity problem [7:1840]
It appears that you are trying to dial from an analog modem into a PRI. If that is correct, and you do not have a digital modem card, it will not work. Jason Coleman - CCNP, CCDP Customer Engineer Network Management Center - Austin (ph) 512-340-3134 (email) [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: SAM Meng Wai [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 6:04 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:RE: AS5300 Async Dial-up Connectivity problem [7:1840] Hi Burgin Kozak, I have similar problem when i using ppp on AS5300. However, i don't encounter any problem when i using slip. Rgds, Sam -Original Message- From: Burgin Kozak [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 6:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: AS5300 Async Dial-up Connectivity problem [7:1840] Hi. I have an AS5300 Access Server. I want to dial-up access to AS5300 using my Laptop and my async modem. But I cant log in. ( I mean AS5300 doesnt authenticate) AS5300s show running-config output and show version output are below. If someone check the configs I will be very happy. Thanks. Regards. Burcin /* ** **/ /*RUNNING CONFIGURATION */ /* ** **/ Current configuration: ! version 12.0 service timestamps debug datetime msec localtime service timestamps log datetime msec localtime no service password-encryption ! hostname merkez-access ! aaa new-model aaa authentication login default local aaa authentication ppp default local none enable secret 5 /* i erased passwords */ enable password 7 /* i erased passwords */ ! username dial password 0 dial username user1 password 0 user1 modem country mica turkey ip subnet-zero no ip domain-lookup ! isdn switch-type primary-net5 ! ! controller E1 0 clock source line primary pri-group timeslots 1-31 ! controller E1 1 clock source line secondary 1 pri-group timeslots 1-31 ! controller E1 2 clock source line secondary 2 ! controller E1 3 clock source line secondary 3 ! controller E1 4 clock source line secondary 4 ! controller E1 5 clock source line secondary 5 ! controller E1 6 clock source line secondary 6 ! controller E1 7 clock source line secondary 7 ! ! interface Loopback0 ip address 10.9.0.1 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast ! interface Ethernet0 ip address 10.32.9.1 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast shutdown ! interface Serial0 ip unnumbered Ethernet0 no ip directed-broadcast no ip mroute-cache shutdown no fair-queue clockrate 2015232 ! interface Serial1 ip unnumbered Ethernet0 no ip directed-broadcast shutdown no fair-queue clockrate 2015232 ! interface Serial2 ip unnumbered Ethernet0 no ip directed-broadcast shutdown no fair-queue clockrate 2015232 ! interface Serial3
RE: Dial backup with OSPF [7:1851]
1. If your remote sites have BRI cards then unless you care going to have someone with analog modems dial-in to the PRI I don't see a need for the digital modems. 2. You can implement the dial portion of DBU (dial back-up) using either backup interfaces or floating static routes. Backup interfaces will watch DCD of the serial interface that you want to backup, and floating static routes rely on routing protocol updates. If have many networks that are frame-relay and I use floating static routes since backup interfaces will not always work. IE: if only the PVC gets dropped and not the line, then backup interfaces will not kick in. 3. If you using floating static routes, then make sure that you deny OSPF in your interesting traffic list, or routing updates will keep the line up and running. There are many great examples of both type of backup scenarios on the Cisco web site. They will also show you how to setup the PRI at the HQ side. Jason Coleman - CCNP, CCDP -Original Message- From: Paulo Roque [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 7:56 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Dial backup with OSPF [7:1851] Hi guys, We are planning a ISDN dial backup for a ospf network with about 30 small stub areas. In the central site we will have a router with PRI line and 30 digital modems and in the remote sites we will have a backup router with ISDN BRI interfaces, which will dial when the main link become unavailable. - Have anyone implement a solution like this? - Has this solution any know problem? - Will backup router dial only when the main link fail or it will dial periodically for routing update? -- Paulo Roque Network Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=1863t=1851 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE depreciation in 2 years [7:1882]
Here is my .02 If you don't yet have your CCIE then how can you possibly assume that it is or is not as difficult as most people think that it is. I have not yet taken the test, although I am in the process of studying for it now. Until I take the test I will continue to treat it with the utmost respect and assume it will be the most difficult experience in my technical career. Do anything less and you are setting yourself up for failure! -Original Message- From: Tennesee Stud [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 10:29 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:CCIE depreciation in 2 years [7:1882] I was wondering what others thought about the CCIE. It seems to me now that there are so many books and training materials geared towards the CCIE, it is making it easier to obtain the CCIE. With a steady diet of the right books ( which everyone seems to agree on) and hands on time with routers and switches ( which to me is the only obstacle), it does not seem as difficlut as it proclaimed (and I think most people see that).My opinion is the CCIE will be devalued considerably in the next few years (As far as salary is concerned as well as prestige) As others have pointed out, the CCIE population is growing at a faster rate (routing and switching), and even though the demand is high for the CCIE now, I think in 2 years there will be a difference in the way the industry views CCIE's .02 thats all Tennesee Stud _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=1895t=1882 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DDR into a PRI [7:1701]
My understanding is that in order for a PRI to take and answer an Analog call you have to have a digital modem card installed in the router with the PRI. I believe that you use the following command to have the PRI take calls that are analog: isdn incoming-voice data. I was not able to quickly find an example of the card in use, but you can find lots of good info about the digital modem card on the web site. Also check out this link for more info on the digital modem card: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/access/acs_mod/cis2600/net_m od2/conntdig.htm Jason Coleman - CCNP, CCDP Customer Engineer Network Management Center - Austin (ph) 512-340-3134 (email) [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Robert Fowler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 8:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:RE: DDR into a PRI [7:1701] We have several remote sites that need to dial-in if there frame relay connection fails, I figured I would set them up with modems hooked to the aux port as a backup interface. My questions revolves around the central site with the PRI. I've been told my another NA that I work with that there is a command that you can enter that will allow you to use the dial-in lines directly on the router without using MICA modems. I thought a modem had to talk to another modem. Hope this helps. What kind of setup did you do and did it work successfully? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 9:49 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: DDR into a PRI [7:1701] I'm confused give me more information! I just setup a T1-PRI with Mica modems. -Original Message- From: Robert Fowler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 9:32 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: DDR into a PRI [7:1701] Ok here is my question, Say you setup DDR with analog lines back to a central location with PRI, would you need to have the MICA modems or is there a command that will let the PRI interface card use the lines from the t1-PRI? I've search the CCO and I've found a lot of information on DDR but nothing on the specifics for coming back into a central PRI. Lost in DDR land FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=1717t=1701 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Extended access list question [7:1718]
Since the access-list is worked from top down, wouldn't the top line allow all IP traffic. I don't think that IP packets are ever going to see the lower lines in your config. Also, don't forget the implicit deny at the end, you are setting up to drop all traffic not on the 192.168.0.X network. Jason Coleman - CCNP, CCDP Customer Engineer Network Management Center - Austin (ph) 512-340-3134 (email) [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: David Eitel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 10:19 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Extended access list question [7:1718] Hello Everybody, I have a segment that I want only established traffic to enter. This has become quite confusing. I want ping, telnet, traceroute and DNS replies as well as FTP. Heres what I currently have. Any feedback would be appreciated. access-list 101 permit ip any 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255 Allowing IP access-list 101 permit tcp any 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255 established --- Allowing established TCP traffic access-list 101 permit udp any 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255 gt 1023 -- Allowing DNS replies access-list 101 permit icmp any any echo-reply -- Allow ping reply David Eitel FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=1725t=1718 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OSPF Stub area question [7:1112]
Consider the following scenario: Two HQ routers that have 2 sites each connected to them over frame relay point-to-point sub-interfaces. The two HQ routers are on the same LAN. These Ethernet ports are in Area 0. The HQ1 WAN links and their sites are in Area 1, and the HQ2 WAN links and their sites are in Area 2. Both Area 1 and Area 2 are setup to be totally stubby areas. When looking at the routing table for a remote site connected to HQ1, will you see only a default route or will you see a default route and the routes for the other remote site in Area 1? I have been taken course and been led to believe that there should only be a default route, but I read a white paper the other day, and it indicated that you will see all Intra-area routes. To me, that means that I should see routes to the other networks within my own area. I am working on setting this up as well to see it work for myself, but interested in any input. Thanks, Jason Coleman - CCNP, CCDP Customer Engineer Network Management Center - Austin (ph) 512-340-3134 (email) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=1112t=1112 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
