RE: Is Pix failover can be Load balancer ? [7:26673]
Or you could stick a CSS or two infront of the pixes. Regards, Dave -Original Message- From: Engelhard M. Labiro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 8:47 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Is Pix failover can be Load balancer ? [7:26673] AFAIK PIX Failover only provides redundancy, no traffic load balance. If you need Firewall load-balance, go to the Nokia IP series firewall, or Checkpoint+Stonebeat combo (www.stonebeat.com) HTH > I wish to know wheather 2 cisco pix firewalls can be configured for > redundancy > as well as Load balancing. > > In general failover means in case of active PIX fails the stand by one will > come into line. > But my customer wants FWLB (Fire wall load balancing). > If any one has idea on this please help me. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26686&t=26673 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco PIX vs Checkpoint FIrewall-1 [7:2878]
This might be of interest: http://www.roble.com/docs/fw1_or_pix.html Dave -Original Message- From: Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 10:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Cisco PIX vs Checkpoint FIrewall-1 [7:2878] In a serious enterprise of scale, I would indeed consider using both a pix and a server based firewall. Bri - Original Message - From: "Jim Brown" To: Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 7:44 AM Subject: RE: Cisco PIX vs Checkpoint FIrewall-1 [7:2878] > Security holes in lower layers? Where did you come up with that, your Cisco > rep? > > -Original Message- > From: Eugene Nine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 5:01 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Cisco PIX vs Checkpoint FIrewall-1 [7:2878] > > > PIX goes up to layer 4, so it won't do things like URL filtering. > Checkpoint (or other SW) can do higher layer protection but may not be as > well at the lower layers (due to security holes in the OS, etc) > Eugene > > ""Chuck Larrieu"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Asked sincerely, what advantages do you see in provisions PIX plus > > checkpoint? > > > > Chuck > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 2:47 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Cisco PIX vs Checkpoint FIrewall-1 [7:2878] > > > > It depends on your security policy , design and needs , generally what we > > advice our > > customers is checkpoint + pix together > > > > Hatim badr a icrit : > > > > > Hi , > > > > > > I would like to know the pluses and minuses of each product . Currently > > We > > > are using checkpoint and I want to convince my management to switch to > > cisco > > > PIX firewall . > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > Hatim > > > > > > > > > Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1 > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3248&t=2878 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RANT: CertificationZone White Paper (Frame Relay) ???
Invalid printf Syntax...aborted compilation...missing semi-colon :)
-Original Message-
From: Phil Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2000 10:02 AM
To: Jean-Michel Roberts
Cc: cisco GroupStudy
Subject: RANT: CertificationZone White Paper (Frame Relay) ???
While( RANTING )
{
printf("
Look, I don't want anyone else asking me privately for
this whitepaper. If you think about it ? "How would
any company survive if it had just one customer" who
just gave all the info away.
Some people think that stealing software/educational
material is fair. As an ex S/W developer I don't
"especially stealing from small startups and people
that are genuinely trying to help me and at a fair
price."
Give the start-ups a chance.)
} // END RANTING
--- Jean-Michel Roberts
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi,
>
> I haven't seen that whitepaper... can you pls mail
> it to me.
>
> I've got some other FR documents... (quite good). Do
> you want me to mail
> them to you?
>
> Cheers,
>
> J-M
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Phil Barker
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 12 June 2000 16:19
> To: cisco GroupStudy
> Subject: CertificationZone White Paper (Frame Relay)
> ???
>
>
> Hi,
> I don't think my last post got through so I'm
> sending again.
>
> My previous Question relates to page 3 of this
> paper
> by David Wolsefer.
> Under the heading of framing formats he refers to
> an
> 8 byte flags field and a 16 byte address field. I'm
> pretty certain this should be bits but don't have
> any
> reference material with me currently. 16 bytes seems
> rather excessive for a serial connection anyway.
> And a 16 byte FCS ???
>
> Can anyone confirm ?
>
> PS: Is the author trying to scare me?
>
> "Before we get into the heart of frame relay, lets
> take a look at the framing formats"
>
> After reading the section on the address field I am
> scared. But seriously, I think this section needs a
> better diagram with all the relevant info detailed.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Phil.
>
>
>
>
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at
> http://mail.yahoo.co.uk
> or your free @yahoo.ie address at
> http://mail.yahoo.ie
>
> ___
> UPDATED Posting Guidelines:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk
or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie
___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
