Passed CIT [7:8293]
... and obtained my CCNP. On to DP. I didn't do as well as I did on the other exams but I passed. I thought the exam questions were vague. I rank the exams in the following order (from least difficult to most difficult) Switching Remote Access Routing Support Thanks to the group for the great posts (I learned a lot from you all). John Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=8293t=8293 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Fasteathernet interface flapping on 2948G - L3 [7:368]
I agree with Brian on this one, I had the same experience with a CAT3500 and older NIC cards. Flapping IF until I hard coded it (In my case 10/half due to CAT3 cabling). You also might upgrade the NIC drivers to see if that helps. John "Bhupinder Shergill" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I am trying to configure 2948G L3 switch and fastethernet is flapping after I assign IP and no shutdown on the interface. Any ideas ? Bhupinder _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=450t=368 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: methods for summarizing routes in FATKID ospf401 [7:20]
True about default route not summarizing, I didn't read the question correctly. Thanks E. John "EA Louie" wrote in message 02a801c0c133$374474e0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:02a801c0c133$374474e0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Here is one other way - take the prefix that you wish to summarize and create a static route to null 0, and redistribute it into the routing protocol - it looks like this, for example, for the entire 172.16.0.0 private Class B network: ip route 172.16.0.0 255.255.0.0 null0 router rip network 172.16.0.0 redistritute static the default route method doesn't summarize at network boundaries, so that's really a non-solution unless the network isn't advertised at all. -e- - Original Message - From: "John Kurkjian" Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco To: Sent: Sunday, April 08, 2001 7:08 PM Subject: Re: methods for summarizing routes in FATKID ospf401 How about default routes (0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0)? John Clue Less wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi, Just trying out ospf401 on fatkid, and was reading the hints about summarizing. Here's the hint "There are two built in OSPF methods to summarize OSPF routes. One way summaries between areas. The other summarizes between Autonomous Systems. Do you know a third way to summarize routes, which works for any router, running any routing protocol? How about a fourth?" http://www.fatkid.com/html/401_advanced_opsf_-_hints.html Does anyone know the 3rd or other ways and could kindly let me know? Clue Less. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=20t=20 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: methods for summarizing routes in FATKID ospf401
How about default routes (0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0)? John Clue Less [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi, Just trying out ospf401 on fatkid, and was reading the hints about summarizing. Here's the hint "There are two built in OSPF methods to summarize OSPF routes. One way summaries between areas. The other summarizes between Autonomous Systems. Do you know a third way to summarize routes, which works for any router, running any routing protocol? How about a fourth?" http://www.fatkid.com/html/401_advanced_opsf_-_hints.html Does anyone know the 3rd or other ways and could kindly let me know? Clue Less. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 3620 router with the NM-2FE2W card
1) IOS "T" does NOT support FE NM's, "XK" does. 2) If you put the flash in a 2600 to upgrade, how will the 2600 boot? As time consuming as it may be, use the console port to upload the image - OR- Use a PCMCIA flash card in a router that is up running tftp the 3620 image to the card use it to boot the new router, then copy to flash.(I used a 1601R to do this and it worked great) Good luck John P.S - you can increase the baud rate on the console port to speed things up, just remember the rate for future console connections. "Thomas" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 9aeg25$ig9$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:9aeg25$ig9$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Someone told me that IOS version followed with 'T' will support (like 12.0(5)T...). Do you think the latest version 12.1.7 will support this NM-2FE2W module? Thanks! "Nick Brooks" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... 12.0.7XK is the first version to support the new combo modules Thomas wrote: Hi All - I have a 3620 router and a NM-2FE2W module. What version of IOS supports this NM-2FE2W on 3620? The router is currently has the standard IP IOS version installed. If a different IOS version is needed, is it possible if I place the flash of this 3620 router into a 2600 router and do the IOS upgrade from there, then put it back to the 3620 once done??? Thanks All! _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 3620 router with the NM-2FE2W card
If I gave misinformation, I apologize. I know that when I tried to use 12.0(7)T, I couldn't get the router to recognize the FE module. I was told by a Cisco SE that this was an issue with the "T" IOS. I guess they corrected it in the later versions. John "Gareth Hinton" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 9ag1jp$im0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:9ag1jp$im0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I'm running 12.1(1)T in a 3620 and from memory I believe 12.1(5)T in a 3660 both with NM2FE2W. I'm fairly sure any T image after 12.1(1)T will do the trick. Certainly CCO says so. Cheers, Gareth ""John Kurkjian"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 9aeiju$lmg$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:9aeiju$lmg$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... 1) IOS "T" does NOT support FE NM's, "XK" does. 2) If you put the flash in a 2600 to upgrade, how will the 2600 boot? As time consuming as it may be, use the console port to upload the image - OR- Use a PCMCIA flash card in a router that is up running tftp the 3620 image to the card use it to boot the new router, then copy to flash.(I used a 1601R to do this and it worked great) Good luck John P.S - you can increase the baud rate on the console port to speed things up, just remember the rate for future console connections. "Thomas" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 9aeg25$ig9$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:9aeg25$ig9$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Someone told me that IOS version followed with 'T' will support (like 12.0(5)T...). Do you think the latest version 12.1.7 will support this NM-2FE2W module? Thanks! "Nick Brooks" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... 12.0.7XK is the first version to support the new combo modules Thomas wrote: Hi All - I have a 3620 router and a NM-2FE2W module. What version of IOS supports this NM-2FE2W on 3620? The router is currently has the standard IP IOS version installed. If a different IOS version is needed, is it possible if I place the flash of this 3620 router into a 2600 router and do the IOS upgrade from there, then put it back to the 3620 once done??? Thanks All! _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Upgrading Catalyst 5000 IOS--get repeated TFTP errors. Please help!
I agree with Dan's point # 2. You are trying to use the Sup3 image with a Sup2 module.The Sup2 doesn't recognize the code. This a problem I've encountered. I tried the same thing with a Cat 6500 with similar results, once I used the right image, no problems. John Daniel Cotts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 303479FA060CD211B893F805A88AA11161@EXCHANGE1">news:303479FA060CD211B893F805A88AA11161@EXCHANGE1... 1) Make sure that you have sufficient DRAM for the image to run. Check the release notes for the CatOS version. 2) It appears that you are trying to tftp a sup3 image to a SupII. 3) Can you ping the tftp server from the switch? The switch from the tftp server? 4) If the name of the file in your tftp folder doesn't match what you have typed-in, then the tftp server will return a not found. -Original Message- From: Rich Chang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 3:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Upgrading Catalyst 5000 IOS--get repeated TFTP errors. Please help! --I am trying to upgrade the IOS on a Catalyst 5000 Cisco Switch to the latest 6.1 series. I am using a CATALYST II SUPERVISOR MMF. I am trying to upgrade the IOS to 6.1 which is about 4.5 megs or better. but I fear my Flash is too low? Or is it? --Show version says 8192K available,3840K used,4352K avaialable" However shouldnt I be overwriting the 3840 used Flash also?--I keep getting TFTP and switch error messages (shown below) I am confused. Could someone please read through these log files and please help me? FIRST, When I type show version, this is what I get: "System Bootstrap Version: 2.2(2) Hardware Version: 1.0 Model: WS-C5000 Serial #: 006051071 Mod Port Model Serial # Versions --- -- - 1 2 WS-X5506 006051071 Hw : 1.0 Fw : 2.2(2) Fw1: 2.2(1) Sw : 4.4(1) 2 24 WS-X5010 003617325 Hw : 2.4 Fw : 1.1 Sw : 4.4(1) DRAM FLASH NVRAM Module Total Used Free Total Used Free Total Used Free -- --- --- --- --- --- --- - - - 1 16384K 9905K 6479K 8192K 3840K 4352K 256K 107K 149K Uptime is 6 days, 2 hours, 23 minutes SWITCH#2 (enable)" SECOND, This is what I get when I try to run the TFTP command: "SWITCH#2 (enable) copy tftp flash IP address or name of remote host [172.26.100.1]? Name of file to copy from [cat5000-sup3.5-5-6.bin]? Download image file cat5000-sup3.5-5-6.bin is unrecognized! SWITCH#2 (enable)" THIRD: This is the TFTP Error Message: "Tue Apr 03 15:49:33 2001: Failed ( State Error ). Tue Apr 03 15:53:42 2001: Sending 'cat5000-sup3.5-5-6.bin' file to 172.26.100.2 in binary mode # Tue Apr 03 15:53:42 2001: Failed ( State Error )." -- -- Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCNP certification
Your CCNA 1.0 is valid towards the CCNP 2.0 track. If your getting close to having to re-certify the CCNA (It's valid for 3 years) you don't think you'll be done with the CCNP by then, you may have to re-certify CCNA before the CCNP will be valid. Here is a link to the CCNP site. http://cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/lan/programs/ccnp.html Best of luck John Hunt Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hello everyone, Just a stupid question - I did my CCNA certification (ver1.0) about 2 years ago and I'm currently studying for CCNP. Is it true that I must first re-certify my CCNA before I could take my CCNP exams? Or can I just do my CCNP and don't have to worry about my CCNA. Can somebody please shed some light on this? Regards, Hunt Lee _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: passed BCMSN
VLAN leakage is when traffic destined for a certain VLAN (ie: broadcast traffic) is forwarded to switch ports that aren't assigned to the VLAN. The term "leaking" is used to describe the condition. I really had to search for a definition on this one. Good luck in future exams John "Gopinath Pulyankote" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 9aalds$noe$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:9aalds$noe$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Just came back from the test center. I found it harder than BSCN too. I finished with 868, when I got a 908 in BSCN. Some of the Q on trunking were very confusing. BTW, what is "frame leakage" ??? Best of luck for those taking the exam. ""Cisco Kidd"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I passed today with a score of 857...I just wanted to say that I thought this test was harder than the BSCNmaybe I think backwards or something (I scored 931 on the BSCN)...thanks to all that have posted and study hard. Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BCMSN
I took the exam yesterday (got a 901 on it). A tip for the group, use the Cisco Press book. It was much more thorough than the Sybex book (even though Sybex is easier reading). Just my $0.02 John _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unicast packets on Cat6K
Can anyone explain why incrementing unicast packet counters on a Cat6000 is a negative thing? I can't seem to find anything that says this is undesirable. Am I missing something? Thanks. John _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to Make Frame Relay Redundant?
Where are the FR's going (P2P or Internet)? As previously mentioned, to really be redundant you need a second router. If this is an internet connection to 2 different ISP's, a BGP solution would provide redundancy. John "Raul De La Garza" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Please forgive me if this topic has already been explored. I am considering the purchase of a 3640 in order to provide Internet access to our office at 100 Mbps. I will outfit it with 2 10/100 2-port modules. I am also considering making our Frame Relay network redundant by adding two 1-port T1 w/CSU WICs, however, with only two FR lines coming in how would I make this a fault tolerant solution without having to obtain two more FR circuits? HSRP is definitely being considered. Obviously, an Ethernet hub or switch is out of the question. Any help you could provide would be greatly appreciated. Raul De La Garza III _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Link problem
Try forcing speed/duplex on the switch port and client side. I've seen this problem when auto-negotiation doesn't work right. Try upgrading the NIC drivers too. John Aftab Rashid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi, We are having problems in the performance of the ethernet. We are using Cisco 2924 Switch for our Lan but I have observed that of and on various links goes down and up quiet often. look as follows Mar 4 16:54:31 dialup20 4448: 1w2d: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface FastEthernet0/21, changed state to up Mar 4 16:54:31 dialup20 4449: 1w2d: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Inter face FastEthernet0/21, changed state to up Mar 4 16:54:39 dialup20 4450: 1w2d: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface FastEthernet0/21, changed state to down Mar 4 16:54:39 dialup20 4451: 1w2d: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Inter face FastEthernet0/21, changed state to down Mar 4 16:55:11 dialup20 4452: 1w2d: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface FastEthernet0/21, changed state to up Mar 4 16:55:11 dialup20 4453: 1w2d: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Inter face FastEthernet0/21, changed state to up Mar 4 17:36:17 dialup20 4454: 1w2d: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Inter face FastEthernet0/21, changed state to down Mar 4 17:37:08 dialup20 4455: 1w2d: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface FastEthernet0/21, changed state to up Mar 4 17:37:08 dialup20 4456: 1w2d: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Inter face FastEthernet0/21, changed state to up Mar 4 18:25:23 dialup20 4457: 1w2d: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface FastEthernet0/23, changed state to up Mar 4 18:25:23 dialup20 4458: 1w2d: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Inter face FastEthernet0/23, changed state to up. I have checked the cables they are perfectly alright. I added carrier-delay of 4 sec but got no advantage. What could be the source of the problem and can I solve it. Thanks Aftab Rashid _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: why my arrow key (up down) can not bringing back the commands????
This is a known problem in Win2K's Hyper Terminal. It is supposed to be fixed in the next service pack. John Kurkjian Senior Systems Engineer Winstar E-business Solutions Li Li Zhao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hey Tom, Thanks for the response. But my preference was "Terminal" keys. Any more idea? --- Tom Keough [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is because your preferences are set to "Windows" keys rather that "Terminal" keys... HTH, Tom Tom Keough CCNA MCSE ATT Global Network Solutions Standard Access Management Managed Router Service Tier 2 Technical Support Tampa, Florida - Original Message - From: "Li Li Zhao" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 19, 2001 6:57 PM Subject: why my arrow key (up down) can not bringing back the commands Hello group, Very strange that up and down arrow key doesn't work in my hyperterminal when I use console cable connected to Cisco routers. I use Windows2000, I tried VT100, ANSI, and autoselct. None of them work. However, the 'ctrl+p' works. Any help? __ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices! http://auctions.yahoo.com/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
