CIT Test [7:34856]
I know that folks have asked about this test, but I am taking it Thursday, I would like to know of the people who thought that it was the hardest test, did you also feel it was equally hard to study for? I am studying through the book and BOSON, and quite honestly I think that this part comes natural to me. I certainly don't want to underestimate the test. ( I don't think I will) but I would like some feedback on this. Let me know if you guys remember how you felt. [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which had a name of winmail.dat] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=34856&t=34856 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CIT Test [7:34856]
Already started on them, KEEP THAT SITE UP! Thanks, -Original Message- From: Ole Drews Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 2:22 PM To: 'Priscilla Oppenheimer'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Joshua Barnes' Subject: RE: CIT Test [7:34856] It sounds to me like everyone agree to it being either the easiest or hardest - so it probably won't help answering Joshua's answer very well. And Joshua, I can strongly recommend Priscilla's flash cards - they helped me pass the test; Thanks again for that Priscilla. Good luck on your exam, and have a great weekend, Ole ~~~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ http://www.RouterChief.com ~~~ NEED A JOB ??? http://www.oledrews.com/job ~~~ -Original Message- From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 12:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CIT Test [7:34856] CIT was by the far the easiest for me. I took the Foundation exam before that and it was much more challenging. Do you know about my CIT flash cards, just for fun? The URL is: http://www.priscilla.com/cit/toc.html Good luck. I think you will pass. Priscilla At 11:46 AM 2/8/02, Joshua Barnes wrote: >I know that folks have asked about this test, but I am taking it Thursday, >I would like to know of the people who thought that it was the hardest test, >did you also feel it was equally hard to study for? > >I am studying through the book and BOSON, and quite honestly I think that >this part comes natural to me. I certainly don't want to underestimate the >test. ( I don't think I will) but I would like some feedback on this. Let >me know if you guys remember how you felt. > >[GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which had >a name of winmail.dat] Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=34891&t=34856 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CIT today at 3pm EST [7:35394]
Well the big day is today, I also have an interview today at noon. Hows that for pressure?! Anyhow I have read the McGraw Hill CIT book twice, took all the BOSONs. Lets hope. Is there any last interview or test taking tips you fellas and ladies would like to hand out? Thanks, Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=35394&t=35394 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CIT is passed [7:35451]
I am a CCNP now, looking for all the praise I can get .. ;) ;) Hey at least Im honest! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=35451&t=35451 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oh I almost forgot [7:35463]
Special thanks, goes out to Priscilla for having such a valuable resource. I only went through the first seven flash cards but what effort. You need to be commended. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=35463&t=35463 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCNP [7:35756]
I have found that going through the book a couple of times is the best thing. The Boson's are heralded but I don't know why. I think they suck. JMO. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Liko Agosta Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 2:17 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCNP [7:35756] Whats the best test practise suite for CCNP I am doing the exams in this order a. switching b. routing c. remote access d. support whats the best for a. switching b. routing Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=35764&t=35756 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Review of Boson CCIE Security Pre-Qualification Test # 1 [7:35942]
Like I said before, BOSON is heralded for some strange reason, I think that they are terrible. The absolute best thing you can do in the absence of hands on is read that book 3 times. Your benefits are two fold. You get to be a doggone good reader and you might actually LEARN something. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Patrick Bass Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 1:31 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Review of Boson CCIE Security Pre-Qualification Test # 1 [7:35932] There are a lot of errors in this exam. Some of it is just being plain wrong, more of it is "data-entry" type errors. The author has always written me back when I notify him of an error; and this has been, unfortunately, quite often. Also, one thing I do not like at all is the questions that have four answers, and it says "Select the 4 best answers" or whatever. How hard would it have been to put a couple of extra answers in these questions to at least making it challenging? Finally, some of the web-links cited in the answers have nothing to do with the question; perhaps this are more of the "data-entry" errors? For $39 dollars, its hard to go wrong... but I've seen Boson put out much better quality stuff before. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=35942&t=35942 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCNP Boot camps [7:35927]
The best one is to not to go to one. If you have two years expy in the field with Cisco just brush up on a cramsession and go take the exam. Shouldn't be too hard. I despise keeping those market killers alive. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of chris fong Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 12:07 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCNP Boot camps [7:35927] I have been offered a paid opportunity to attend a CCNP boot camp of my choice. I have two years experience in networking with Cisco equipment and have already passed BSCN. The ability to acquire the CCNP in two weeks time is very attractive. Does anybody have any suggestions or recommendations on which CCNP boot camp is best? __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games http://sports.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=35943&t=35927 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378]
Good to see that poor behavior is visited with goodness and wholesome encouragment. My name is Joshua and I am new to this board. Looking to learn all that can be taught! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of anil Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 12:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378] Miss Priscilla >>The session layer is an elusive beast that is not implemented much Yes, well the level of research that went into your statement matches the intelligence of a newt, doesn't it? If you had a brain cell it would die of loneliness. -Anil PS fun isn't it, attacking someone's intelligence in public. Strongly suggest you apologise to protect yourself against further remiss. -- >I don't agree that the other guy did any real research The "other guy" is called "Anil" You could not even be bothered to do the resrarch to check the name.. Getting sloppy in your old age miss (must be a girl). Suggest you kindly *drop dead* before making personal attacks on my credentials/ability to do research. Thanks -Anil PS Ever heard the saying "Don't shoot the messenger." ?? Hurts when people attack you doesn't it..suggest you stop. An apology would be a small miracle. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28871&t=28378 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Speeding up BGP convergance in Bootcamp lab 18 [7:28859]
YEEHAW!! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Howard C. Berkowitz Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 12:41 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Speeding up BGP convergance in Bootcamp lab 18 [7:28859] >Nice... Nothing like taking cheap shots on someone that is sending to a >forum thats supposed to help you learn. > >I'll bet you can remember a time back when you didn't know everything >there is to know about BGP. > >Try adjusting the timers, soft neighbor reconfiguration. > "fwells12" 12/10/01 06:22PM >>> >Dude, your a senior network engineer? > >Doing a clear ip bgp * forces the neigbors to renegotiate their >relationship >and resend ALL the routes. > >I think they are probably talking about using the neighbor >soft-reconfiguration command. > > >- Original Message - >From: "Phillip Estrada (EUS)" >To: "Antonio Marfil" ; > >Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 3:51 PM >Subject: RE: Speeding up BGP convergance in Bootcamp lab 18 > > >> Dude, you're a senior network engineer? >> > > Clear ip bgp * Dude, Isn't as simple as it looks. Just as a start of knowing about some of the mechanisms being introduced, an excerpt from my upcoming book, Building Service Provider Networks, is below. I haven't read this specific scenario. I will make the point, however, that fast BGP reconvergence isn't necessarily a good thing, when weighed against Internet stability. Reconverging quickly to a failed net is futile. Enterprises and ISPs will have different perspectives on this. So the scenario may be artificial rather than real-world. BGP convergence itself is not that well-defined, and I'm actively involved in an IETF effort to formalize the definitions: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-bmwg-conterm-00.txt -- The next implementer approach was to have the router store the entire Adj-RIB-In, rather than only those routes in it that passed filtering criteria and went to the Loc-RIB. If the acceptance policy then changed, the information already was there to refilter. While this improvement avoided needing to do a full reconvergence, it was both memory and processor intensive. The next step was to negotiate a soft refresh between pairs of BGP speakers. When both routers advertise the route refresh capability, a speaker whose policies change can send a ROUTE REFRESH message to the neighbor. On receipt of that message, the neighbor will readvertise the appropriate Adj-RIB-Out, which the local speaker will refilter and send the surviving routes to its Loc-RIB. Figure 12: Route Refresh Even though soft refresh improved the situation, there was still the The Adj-RIB-In conceptually contains all BGP routes received on an interface. When the speaker at the other end is sending all, or a substantial part, of the global routing table, per-interface memory requirements can become quite large. A fairly straightforward workaround was to keep the Adj-RIB-In conceptual. As routes were received, acceptance policy rules were applied to them, and only those that "survived" the input policy were sent to the Loc-RIB. This seems a reasonable workaround -- until you change an acceptance policy rule. At that point, how do you know that one of the "rejected" routes would not pass the new policy, and belongs in the RIB? The first operational solution was to "bounce" the BGP session up and down, resulting in the neighbor resending its entire Adj-RIB-Out. Especially on slower links, this could take significant bandwidth and introduce a noticeable delay. If BGP rules were followed, all routes whose next hop was to the neighboring router were now invalid, and would have to be readvertised to all other neighbors, causing a cascading bandwidth and processing requirement on other routers, potentially across the entire Internet. real-world problem that the sender of the Adj-RIB-Out might very well send routes that would be filtered by the receiver, wasting bandwidth and receiver processing time. Outbound Route Filtering was a new way to deal with this problem. Outbound Route Filtering I have long maintained that BGP doesn't transmit policies, but sends the information on which policy decisions are made based on information configured into the router by element management. Outbound Route Filtering (ORF) has forced me to modify that position, giving a final (if qualified) victory to a long-running debate between me and Sue Hares, co-chair of the IDR working group that develops BGP. At the next IETF we attend, I owe her a drink. The idea of ORF is that it can be of mutual benefit to a pair of routers to exchange their acceptance policies, so a router about to send its Adj-RIB-Out can prefilter it, thus requiring only the bandwidth for the updates the receiver really will use. Figure 13: Outbound Route Refresh Several independent proposals have been made for the policies that can be exchanged, and there is an attempt in
ADMIN to be a CCIE? [7:28911]
I am an internal admin, I am planning on the CCIE certification, but I dont go out on cisco calls. My company has a lab specifically for our 2 CCIEs but is that enough to get the cert. I would like to belive that I can do anything I set my mind to, but I would also like to set realistic goals. I have cisco certs already and have found them relativley easy to come by but again, it comes down to that whole realistic goals approach. Please hand me your thoughts, dont worry aout discouraging me, only I can do that! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28911&t=28911 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ADMIN to be a CCIE? [7:28911]
I am a CCNA, CCDA and 3/4 CCNP have only the CIT left. I haven't even attempted the written because I am afraid to pass and then be unprepared for the lab and subsquently run out of time. I really need a dose of reality and a confidence shot and I think that things will settle in for me. I am not easily intimidated but our two CCIE's are always talking like it is impossible to pass the first time and basically playing it up like it is the most impossible thing that you will ever do. I respect the lab, I feel that it has a difficulty level unlike anything I have ever heard of. BUT!, I feel like, you can pass anything if you know your stuff. The tests that I have taken so far have had their own difficulty level and in retrospect I dont think that they were that hard. For the amount of time that I studied, I passed rather easily I think. Here is a little scenario, I studied for and passed the BCRAN in a week. I studied and passsed the BCSN in 2 weeks. I read the switching book by karen webb (she is terrible, IMHO) 3 times then took the test 2 weeks later. The CIT I plan on spending a month on it. Then I was gonna take the CID which I really planned on taking my time on. Because a friend of mine failed it twice and design test are always harder. -Original Message- From: Bill Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 2:49 PM To: Joshua Barnes Subject: RE: ADMIN to be a CCIE? [7:28911] Yes you can do it. You need some of the books that are talked about here and tons of rack time. Start with the Caslow book. CCO is an excellent reference. Have you passed the CCIE written yet? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joshua Barnes Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 11:49 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ADMIN to be a CCIE? [7:28911] I am an internal admin, I am planning on the CCIE certification, but I dont go out on cisco calls. My company has a lab specifically for our 2 CCIEs but is that enough to get the cert. I would like to belive that I can do anything I set my mind to, but I would also like to set realistic goals. I have cisco certs already and have found them relativley easy to come by but again, it comes down to that whole realistic goals approach. Please hand me your thoughts, dont worry aout discouraging me, only I can do that! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28962&t=28911 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ADMIN to be a CCIE? [7:28911]
Absolutely, CCIE is by no means the end of me, and I am not after vast riches, I plan on staying with my current company a long time. I have really just deicided to become certifeid because I lack education. But that won't be for long either. Thank You for your comments. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 3:17 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: ADMIN to be a CCIE? [7:28911] Just keep in mind that a Cert is a Cert. In two years it will expire and you will have to recert to keep current. A certification is basically to validate your experience, whether it was acquired in the lab, school, or in a production network. All of this will come into play when you apply for a job or ask for a raise. You have to decide if you are going for the cert because of personal reasons (like myself), or if you are looking for an increase in pay. If it is for the later, and you expect to stay at the same job, make it known to your employers on your intentions and see what they are willing to do in terms of compensation/support. Then you can make your own decision whether or not to pursue this cert. If you plan to leave your organization in search of vast riches you may be in for a rude awakening. Check out Dice, Monster, Headhunter, and all of the rest of job classifieds. Determine if even after you get the CCIE cert if the location, pay, other job specifics to see if with the CCIE you will even have the necessary work experience to meet those job qualifications. For about 90 percent of the jobs that require a CCIE, they will expect you to also work on higher end switches/routers not to mention SOLARIS/NT/LINUX/Openview/Ciscowork and the firewalls all of which you will not have if you just played around with 6 low end routers/switches to prepare for the CCIE. If you are like most people, it will take around 6-18 months to get the CCIE if you are just starting. What will the market be like in 6 to 18 months? My CCIE tracking (from newsgroups) has come up with approximately 4-5 CCIEs are being produced every day worldwide. So by the time you get your CCIE; 180 - 540 more CCIEs of which about half of them are in the US would have been certified. The salary offers has also been dropping on almost a monthly basis. Since I originally got my CCIE because of personal reasons, the lowering of pay does not bother me. It may however affect others. Good luck on your efforts, what ever it maybe. Always remember that the CCIE is not an end, it is just a marker along your way to the continous process of acquiring knowledge. Stanford Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28964&t=28911 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: I mean the etherchannel of ranging of the multi-device ! [7:29463]
This is not etherchannel, this is more similar to stacking. Etherchannel by definition is the aggragation of port bandwidth by bonding the channels together. Simimlar to PPP. You can bond 2,3 or 4. What you have isn't very smart because of all of the STP convergence that would be required. The absolute best scenario in this case would be to stack the 3500's together and then do etherchannel to another switch, say a cat5000. This way you achieve a very fast switching backbone and still maintain almost gig to another switch. You don't want to sacrifice ports if you don't have to. Ports cost money there is even a formula, I don't remember is though. Hope this helps. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of cage Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 10:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: I mean the etherchannel of ranging of the multi-device ! [7:29445] 3500-3500-3500-3500(3500 stacks) |||| 3500-3500-3500-3500(3500 stacks) The 4 links between the two stacks are etherchannels, is it available? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=29463&t=29463 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: T1 connection speed [7:29937]
That sounds like too much thought I would just get a sniffer or Paradyne frame saver csu/dsu and let it tell Me that it is working at the right speed. But anyway, yeah the way you did it will work too. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of A.Steinbock Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2001 4:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: T1 connection speed [7:29937] If I can copy a file of 2,481 KB across a T1 line in 14 seconds, can I claim that the T1 line is working fine and configured properly? Saying that 2481 KB is 2,540,544 Bytes, or 20,324,352 bits divided by 14 seconds- the result is 1,451,740 bits per second. Adding Windows overheads, this is almost equal to 1,540,000 bits per second T1 line speed. I would conclude that this T1 line is working properly. Am I right? TIA for your input. Akim Get free e-mail and a permanent address at http://www.amexmail.com/?A=1 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=29939&t=29937 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco175x [7:29967]
Start here, but then go to the config tool that is online http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/779/smbiz/service/pubmatrix/hw/hw380_xr ef.htm -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mina Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2001 5:18 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco175x [7:29967] Does Cisco175x support 3 VIC or 6 voice/fax ports? Mina Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=29979&t=29967 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco 2950-24 [7:31156]
No way man, these are much better, check it, http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/si/casi/ca2950/index.shtml way way way cool - Original Message - From: "Church, Chuck" To: Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:21 AM Subject: RE: Cisco 2950-24 [7:31156] > Jeremy, > > I set one up once. It's IOS based, much like a 2900XL. I can't > speak for reliability or performance, but I assume it's very similar to the > 29 and 35 XLs. > > Chuck > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Wright, Jeremy > Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 8:42 AM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: Cisco 2950-24 > > > does anyone have any experience with the Cisco 2950-24 port switch? We are > thinking of purchasing a few but i wanted to get some feedback from the list > first. thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31163&t=31156 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I would like to get off of this list [7:31458]
But the web site says that my email doesnt exist..any suggestions? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31458&t=31458 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Time Between CCNP Tests [7:62398]
You have 3 years from the time of completion of the last test. Unless it's two yearsGod I hope it's not two years. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 5:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Time Between CCNP Tests [7:62398] I was wondering how long I have between each CCNP test. I heard 2 years, but does that mean I have two years for example, between the routing and switching, then when I take the switching, I have another 2 years between either the remote access or support? or is it 2 years to get them all? Thanks for the help :-) Jarred Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62414&t=62398 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Wireless Question [7:63569]
I just implemented a 1200 solution...I don't have access to the rack, but maybe I could help with any questions you have. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Juan Blanco Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2003 5:51 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Wireless Question [7:63569] Team, I need to have access to a Cisco Wireless AP-1200 equipment this weekend, Do any one here knows an online Rack available with the AP-1200 which I could use. Thanks, Juan Blanco The greatest glory in living lies not in never falling, but in rising every time we fall ." -- Nelson Mandela Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=63597&t=63569 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Dreadful writing on CCNP support exam. [7:56237]
I thought the routing exam was the worst offender for ambiguity. CIT a close second. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nobody@;groupstudy.com] Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2002 2:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Dreadful writing on CCNP support exam. [7:56237] I couldn't agree with you more, I failed by six points (guess I need more quality studying time). Some questions had me asking what are they asking here "the meaning of life". Not that I'm sour grapes but yes the wording is very vague at best. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56381&t=56237 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PIX Client & WIN2000 Internet sharing [7:57988]
The newest client has options for allowing NAT and PAT passthrough But the best thing is to have a router that will do static NAT x-lations... Even the low end d-links cable/dsl routers will do it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Edward Sohn Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2002 4:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: PIX Client & WIN2000 Internet sharing [7:57988] nope, it won't work...ipsec needs it's own IP address and not PAT. i've tested this extensively, and it won't work...if anyone else can comment, please do. either way, best thing to do is get a few statics from your ISP and statically translate... ed -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Derek Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2002 9:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: PIX Client & WIN2000 Internet sharing [7:57988] I have a home network which uses an ADSL line which is shared via Internet Connection Sharing. I have 3 pc's in the network and they can all access the internet. From these pc's i am trying to connect to my office VPN.I Can ping the address but cannot connect via Dialer. The VPN connection works when Internet Sharing is disabled. Is their anyway around this ? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=58008&t=57988 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: VPN with cilents behind NAT [7:62058]
If you have the DSL router just add this line ip nat inside source static that will allow your VPN clients through your NAT router to the VPN termination point. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Michael Vasilenko Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 3:07 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: VPN with cilents behind NAT [7:62058] Hello I need to implement VPN, which will be able to used by data transfers and VoIP with server on public IP and clients, connected to internet by xDSL router/modem/switch with real dynamic IP (allocated by DHCP). As far as I understood, I need to setup IPSec tunnel from CO to each client. And VPDN is not the way to go. Am I correct? Any help would be fine. Thanks. -- Michael Vasilenko Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62073&t=62058 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just wanted to let everyone know I was back! [7:55232]
Not that most of you know me, but mebbe! Cheers, I know Dan Herleighe is watching..sorry about the horrendous spelling of your name. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55232&t=55232 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
