NTP Question [7:29770]
A friend of mine was doing a PIX installation on the edge of a W2K environment. He was trying to allow NTP through the PIX but it would not go. He found that, since he was using an inbound ACL, the packet would eventually reach the explicit deny. According to his research, he had to allow port 123 (NTP) in his ACL in able to allow it through the firewall, even though it was established. The question that has since been unanswered: Does NTP use UDP or TCP or both? Any ideas? ccie1ab (chuck) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=29770&t=29770 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco lab equipment [7:29079]
I just bought a good deal of equipment for my new home lab. They have the best prices I was able to find, and Kelly is a really nice person. You may want to give her a call and see what she can do. Here's the info: Kelly Andersen Optimum Data, Inc. 5018 Leavenworth St. Omaha, NE 68106 phone: 877-797-8802 alternate: 800-879-8795 fax: 402-575-2011 Take Care and Good Luck, ccie1ab -Original Message- From: Stephane Wantou Siantou [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 10:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco lab equipment [7:29079] Hi everyone, Does anybody know where and how to get Cisco equipment cheap? I would like to invest in a Cisco lab to prepare for the CCIE lab but I don't have too much money. Stephane Wantou Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=29091&t=29079 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: C2620 with NM-1FE1R2W? [7:28716]
Actually this NM does not work in the 26xx series. I believe the logic is that the processor in the 26xx cannot handle the additional FE cards, however that's just my guess (I mean a 2621 would have two right?). You will find that any NM-FExxx will not work in a 26xx router. Sorry 'bout the bad news, ccie1ab -Original Message- From: Feargal Ledwidge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 5:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: C2620 with NM-1FE1R2W? [7:28716] Theres a good croos-referencing tool at: http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/front.x/Support/HWSWmatrix/hwswmatrix.cgi It lets you search by chassis model and module model and shows the IOS version supported. Feargal Feargal Ledwidge [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager of Network & Systems Administration TeraGlobal Communications -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jim Brown Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 1:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: C2620 with NM-1FE1R2W? [7:28716] The blurb actually states it is not compatible with the 2600. Check the NM table towards the bottom of the link. -Original Message- From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 1:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: C2620 with NM-1FE1R2W? [7:28716] Here is a marketing blurb that appears to say it is supported on the 2600 platform but me thinks it lies ;) http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/rt/2600/prodlit/2636m_ds.htm Dave Johan Hjalmarsson wrote: > > Does a NM-1FE1R2W= work in a Cisco 2620 router? > > I thought all NM's worked in both the C26xx and C36xx series, but I > can't get this configuration to work. When I look in the HW/SW > compability matrix only SW for the C36xx is shown for this module. > > Any suggestions? -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28830&t=28716 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Need BCRAN latest Dumps! [7:28236]
We not prone to liking dumps around here. You see, there's this thing called a confidentiality agreement. You know, that pesky thing that keeps us who have work our tails off to earn a certification or two by reading books, doing installations, asking questions, and buying labs for our homes. You know, those of us who care more about the technology than the piece of paper on the wall. My feeling is, "to each his own." If you want to cheat to gain your certification, fine. However, don't fault me when our certification levels are equal and we are vying for the same customer or job. I can assure you, it may take me longer to get my certifications than you, but when we come face to face with the same customer or job...stand aside, it's all mine. So you go ahead and cheat then wonder why you can't rate amongst your peers. I seem to remember Microsoft had this problem with the MCSE NT4.0 certification. After a while everyone had their MCSE. Maybe 15% of the MCSE were worth a salt because everyone cheated. Let's not let this guy decline our value in the market. I may seem a bit extreme, but we need to ban all of these cheater sites. They destroy everything we value with the certification. Even if you only use them to brush up before the test. If you can't pass the test do more, do cheat!! ccie1ab -Original Message- From: SA J [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 8:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Need BCRAN latest Dumps! [7:28236] Hi All, This is my first email on groupstudy mailing list! i will be giving BCRAN this weekend! i have read the book of BCRAN - Cisco Press! also did some practice of BOSON! now i need some latest Dumps of BCRAN, if available anywhere pls. do let me know! B'Rgds, SAJ __ Do You Yahoo!? Send your FREE holiday greetings online! http://greetings.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28332&t=28236 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BGP question [7:27879]
Can we see your whole config? ccie1ab -Original Message- From: Bill Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 4:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: BGP question [7:27879] You have to have IP connectivity to your neighbor before BGP will work. Static routes will get you the same thing as RIP. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Stephen C Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 2:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: BGP question [7:27879] When configuring BGP on a "singlehome" net, everything I read says the basic config commands are ... for S 0\0 to S 0\0 (200.200.1.1 to 200.200.1.2) wire 200.200.1.0 Router-A(config)#router bgp [as#] Router-A(config-router)#network [subnet#] Router-A(config-router)#neighbor [subnet#] remote-as [as#] now filling in the blanks Router-A(config)#router bgp [200] Router-A(config-router)#network [200.200.1.0] Router-A(config-router)#neighbor [200.200.1.1] remote-as [100] unless I configure RIP on the same wire I get nothing. No mention of RIP in any of the books I reference. I config RIP and get a "from show ip route" this C200.200.1.0/24 is directly connected, Serial1 R200.200.100.0/24 [120/1] via 200.200.1.1, 00:00:14, Serial1 [120/1] via 200.200.2.1, 00:00:14, Serial0 C200.200.2.0/24 is directly connected, Serial0 C192.168.1.0/24 is directly connected, Ethernet0 O192.168.2.0/24 [110/74] via 192.168.1.2, 01:54:20, Ethernet0 O E2 192.168.3.0/24 [110/20] via 192.168.1.2, 01:54:20, Ethernet0 Not showing bgp on the connections the Show ip bgp yields . Router-A#show ip bgp BGP table version is 3, local router ID is 200.200.2.2 Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete Network Next HopMetric LocPrf Weight Path * 200.200.1.0 200.200.2.1 0 0 100 i * 200.200.1.1 0 0 100 i *> 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i Where did I pick up the Static/Default paths from * 200.200.2.0 200.200.2.1 0 0 100 i * 200.200.1.1 0 0 100 i *> 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i Where did I pick up the Static/Default paths from Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27888&t=27879 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ISDN Simulator [7:27876]
I am looking for an ISDN simulator (BRI). Anyone know of a good, inexpensive device I can put into my home lab? ccie1ab Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27876&t=27876 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Subnetting [7:27808]
How about placing NAT on the external router and running a private address on the internal networks. ccie1ab -Original Message- From: VoIP Guy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 9:45 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Subnetting [7:27808] If you really got a class B, it would be 255.255.0.0, where you could just create 254 Class C networks. If you got a class C network, you can't do it without more VLANs. ""Andy Hutchinson"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Can anyone help ! > I have been assigned by our Head Office a Class B address > (Let's say 172.133.205.0) with a subnet mask of 255.255.255.0 > which gives me 254 hosts available. > However i have to split this between 3 locations > like so : > > Loc A : Minimum Addresses Required 160 (HQ) > Loc B : Minumum Addresses Required 16 > Loc C : Minumum Addresses Required 48 > > Loc B & C will each have a router that connects to a router at Loc A. > > Any ideas on how this can done ? > > Thanks > > Andy Hutchinson Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27871&t=27808 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: /31 subnet. [7:27742]
Sure, but then what are your network and broadcast addresses? ccie1ab -Original Message- From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 6:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: /31 subnet. [7:27742] Point to point connections, with a /30 you waste 50% of the avaivalable addresses. Dave Nicolas FEVRIER wrote: > > Hi group, > > I'm puzzled by the use of /31 subnets... > Anybody can explain me the benefits of such a subnet on an interface ? > > Thanxx. > > Nicolas. -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27838&t=27742 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 2500 Router problem [7:27695]
What routing protocol are you using? What does the "sh ip rou" command display for you? ccie1ab -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of James gruggett Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 5:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 2500 Router problem [7:27695] I have a lab setup as follows: 2 2500 series routers connected to a 2900 switch. Router1 E0 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0 Router 2 E0 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0 SwitchIP 192.168.1.3 255.255.255.0 I can ping and telnet to Router 1 and the switch. I can not ping Router2. When I telnet I receive this error message(Cam't open connection to host on port 23, a socket operation was attempted to an unreachable host) I console into Router 2 and E0 looks fine with ip ans it states it is administrately up. Any suggestions? Thanks, James Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27830&t=27695 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Time [7:27705]
Does anyone know the polling interval for NTP on Cisco routers and switches? Is it adjustable? ccie1ab Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27705&t=27705 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NAT commands [7:27539]
You will need to static assign a NAT address to your server's IP. Then you tell the remote user the public IP address to connect to, NAT takes care of it internally. Hope my explanation makes sense. ccie1ab -Original Message- From: NKP [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 8:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: NAT commands [7:27539] Hi All I have the following scenario . I have a Cisco 2600 router which is connected to the ISDN and I have got a fixed Ip address from my ISP which is assigned to the bri interface , it is connecting fine .All the internal addresses are translated on ethernet on my ethernet I have a Windows 2K server . I want a remote user to connect to my Win2K server , how should I configure my router to send the request for authentication to this win2K server via VPN as it has a translated IP address . . My remote client is on Win 98 . My present router configs are given below thanks in advance , Navin Parwal Router# Router# Router#sh run Building configuration... Current configuration: ! version 12.0 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname Router ! ! memory-size iomem 10 ip subnet-zero ! ip dhcp pool local network 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 default-router 192.168.1.1 dns-server 12.10.194.34 ! isdn switch-type basic-net3 ! ! ! ! interface Ethernet0/0 ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast ip nat inside no cdp enable no mop enabled ! interface Serial0/0 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast no ip mroute-cache shutdown no fair-queue clockrate 64000 ! interface BRI0/0 ip address 202.157.70.61 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast ip nat outside encapsulation ppp dialer string 226476 dialer-group 1 isdn switch-type basic-net3 no cdp enable ppp chap refuse ppp pap sent-username jbc password hold-queue 75 in ! ip nat inside source list 10 interface BRI0/0 overload ip classless ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 BRI0/0 no ip http server ! access-list 10 permit any dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit ! ! line con 0 transport input none line aux 0 line vty 0 4 login ! no scheduler allocate end Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27602&t=27539 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CAT6500 running on second Supervisor Engine card [7:27544]
No problem with that. Both supervisor are fully functional. At my work we use either single chassis, dual sup or dual chassis, single sup to provide redundancy. Works fine. ccie1ab -Original Message- From: Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 9:42 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CAT6500 running on second Supervisor Engine card [7:27544] Hi All, I have a CAT 6506 with dual supervisor engines and dual MSFCs. I also have another 6506 chassis with power supplies. I wonder if I could steal the second supervisor engine (second slot) w/ its MSFC and put it on the second 6506 chassis? Will the second 6506 chassis be working with second supervisor engine and MSFC card? Thanks! Thomas N. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27601&t=27544 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Military [7:27570]
To whomever pushed for this (I know it was one of you out there)...THANK YOU!!! http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/pdf/VA_reimbursement final1.pdf ccie1ab Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27570&t=27570 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The Scoop on PIX? [7:26607]
1. (Probably the only real reason) Off load processor overhead by having packet filtering happen somewhere other than the device that is trying to also perform routing tasks. 2. DMZ? (Can be handled via router, though [processor issue - see above]) 3. Redundancy without the need for dual WAN connectivity Those are about the only reasons I can think of. Any one else think of any? I have no idea what PIX stands for...GREAT Question!!! ccie1ab -Original Message- From: BASSOLE Rock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 11:01 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: The Scoop on PIX? [7:26607] -Message d'origine- De : Andrew Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Envoyi : dimanche 18 novembre 2001 00:09 @ : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : The Scoop on PIX? [7:26607] Hi all. What are some of the reasons why a person would choose a PIX solution rather than a good router with the the right IOS for security? From what I've read on Cisco's site, there does not seem to be the huge gap between using a router as a firewall solution vs. using a PIX, as some people make it sound. One last thing...for the life of me, I can't find what "PIX" stands for! Any help appreciated! Thanks in advance. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27559&t=26607 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Securing Dial up [7:27545]
how about using RADIUS or TACACS? -Original Message- From: Charles Dowling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 9:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Securing Dial up [7:27545] Hello All, I need some urgent help with tightening security on my 3660 access router. At the moment, users are authenticated during dialup with their assigned usernames and passwords. Analogue users PAP and CHAP while ISDN connections use CHAP. How can I add security using the existing IOS without going for a full blown RSA/Token solution? At this point, I just need to know what is possible. The IOS version I am running is c3660-i-mz.121-4.4.T2. Thanks for your help. Charles. [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of cdowling.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27557&t=27545 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Any difference between PA-POS-OC3MM and PA-MC-STM-1MM? [7:27549]
Looks like the PA-MC-STM-1MM is a multi-channel device: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/pcat/mcstmpa.htm and the PA-POS-OC3MM is not: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios111/cc111/pospa. htm Other than that, I don't see a difference. ccie1ab -Original Message- From: steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 8:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Any difference between PA-POS-OC3MM and PA-MC-STM-1MM? [7:27515] PA-MC-STM-1MM 1 port multichannel STM-1multimode port adapter PA-POS-OC3MM 1-Port Packet/SONET OC3c/STM1 Multimode Port Adapter Thanks , Steven Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27549&t=27549 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PIX 501 [7:27002]
You need to purchase an additional NIC to have a DMZ. It comes standard with two interfaces, as you stated. ccie1ab -Original Message- From: Alex Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 12:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: PIX 501 [7:27002] I followed the link. The data sheet says : Quote Interfaces Console Port: RS-232 (RJ-45) 9600 baud Outside: Integrated 10BaseT port, half-duplex, RJ45 Inside: Integrated auto-sensing, auto-MDIX 4-port 10/100 switch, RJ45 Unquote The way I interpret this is that this PIX basically has two interfaces :- one outside (10BaseT port) and one inside but implemented as 4-port switch, which means you can only have two segments and no DMZ. Please correct me if I am wrong. ""Ole Drews Jensen"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > If you look here (watch for wordwrap) > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/fw/sqfw500/prodlit/px501_ds.htm > > You will see that it has 4 x 10/100 Mbps ethernet interfaces. > > This could be a newer model, but this one with 10 users and 3DES encryption > license, can be bought from new for $495.- > > Hth, > > Ole > > ~~~ > Ole Drews Jensen > Systems Network Manager > CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I > RWR Enterprises, Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ~~~ > http://www.RouterChief.com > ~~~ > NEED A JOB ??? > http://www.oledrews.com/job > ~~~ > > > -Original Message- > From: David Tran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 9:38 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: PIX 501 [7:27002] > > > My take on the PIX501 is that it is similar to Cisco router 2501 in that the > hardware is > FIXED. It only has two interfaces. If you want to add another segment to > your network > (i.e. DMZ) then you have no choice but to upgrade to either a 515 or higher. > Other than > that, the PIX IOS code is the same through out the PIX Series (with the > exception that for > the 501 and 506 you don't have redundancy (fail-over support). > > - Original Message - > From: "Alex Lee" > To: > Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 9:57 AM > Subject: Re: PIX 501 [7:27002] > > > > Has anyone used this PIX yet ? > > > > There were some discussions about this topic 2 weeks(?) ago but none of > the > > participants to the discussion has had any actual hand-on experience with > > the PIX 501 at that time. > > > > I got a quote from our supplier for a new PIX DES bundle with 10 user > > licence for less than $500.00. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27383&t=27002 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can 10Base2/5 be connected with FDDI ? [7:27352]
Basically you're asking if Ethernet can be connected to FDDI. Sure, if you have a hub that has Ethernet connections (10Base2/5/10/100) with a FDDI uplink. I seem to remember that Cabletron (now Enterasys) used to have a switch with this possibility (I think it was a 2200 or 2400 series). That answers the "How?" now for the "Why?". Since these are two different framing types (Ethernet and FDDI) you need a bridge. FDDI's frame size is much larger than Ethernet and therefore a bridge is needed to be able to interpret between the different frame sizes. I don't believe Cisco sells a device with these specific interface types in one box. Could be wrong, but...The Cabletron box used to cost about $2500 list for this solution. Could be worth a call to Portland. ccie1ab -Original Message- From: Charles Mao [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 1:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Can 10Base2/5 be connected with FDDI ? [7:27352] Can 10Base2/5 be connected with FDDI ? If yes, how ? If no, why ? Thank you. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27363&t=27352 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: token ring to eth [7:26828]
There is no media converter for Token Ring to Ethernet. A media converter changes the media (i.e. copper to fiber), not the framing type. As Darren eluded below, you need a bridge to change from Token Ring to Ethernet (or a 2513 is a good solution, also). ccie1ab -Original Message- From: Darren Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 3:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: token ring to eth [7:26828] What exactly are you trying to accomplish here? The 2502 only has one token ring and two serial interfaces. If you had a 2513, the router itself would be your 'media converter' between TR and Ethernet segments. To my knowledge, there is no such animal to change your token ring interface into an ethernet interface. Darren At 05:23 AM 11/20/2001 -0500, Atakan OZDEMIR wrote: >Hi all, > >Where can I find the converter token ring to ethernet for 2502 ? any idea > >thanks Darren x$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$x$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$xx Lucent Technologies NetworkCare Professional Services http//www.lucent.com/netcare/ Darren S. Crawford - CCNP, CCDA, CCIE Written Northwest Region - Sacramento Office Voicemail (916) 859-5200 x310 Pager (800) 467-1467 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] x$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$x$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$xx "You always have time for things you put first" - Tucker Resources Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26931&t=26828 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: All you veterans... [7:26301]
Great idea, I'll sign the petition. ccie1ab -Original Message- From: Estes, Timothy R. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 3:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: All you veterans... [7:26301] I contacted Cisco, the Veterans Administration and the California Department of Veterans Affairs about this subject in July. Unfortunately I haven't hear anything in a while. The VA advised me that for veterans to be reimbursed for the Cisco Career Certification program, the program would have to be "accredited" by the state Department of Veterans Affairs in the state where Cisco's headquarters resides. I contacted the California Department of Veterans affairs and found them to be very cooperative. They wished to be put in contact with the correct people at Cisco, so I gave them all of the contact info I could from my perspective. After a couple of weeks, I received the following email from Cisco ([EMAIL PROTECTED])... >Dear Timothy, > >Thank you for your feedback. > >Due to requests from our dedicated customers, such as yourself, Cisco has >applied to have the Cisco Career Certification exams approved under the VA >Reimbursement Program. Once the details are finalized we will post the >information to our website. > >We thank you for your continued support of the Cisco Career Certifications >program. > >Cisco Career Certifications I have no idea what the status of Cisco's application is. I hope them get it approved soon, I have the 4 CCNP test to go! Maybe as a group we could use our collective resources to expedite this application? Timothy Estes CCNA, CCDA Sr. Network Systems Analyst Intermedia Communications (WorldCom) Tampa FL [EMAIL PROTECTED] (formerly RM3 USN) -Original Message- From: Sal DiStefano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 9:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: All you veterans... [7:26301] Funny the Golf Course Superintendents Association of America is on the list but not Cisco. I called and they said to send it in and they may pay for it anyway. Sal - Original Message - From: "Jeff D" To: Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 5:32 PM Subject: All you veterans... [7:26301] > Check it out for reimbursement: > > https://www.gibill.va.gov/Education/LCVets.htm Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26769&t=26301 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: File needed - CPA3640 upgrade file [7:26253]
Only one...however, we CCNP's are authorized as many as needed to eventually gain that Holy Grail status. So, to continue in my quest of the dumb questions.what is the CPA3640 file? What does it do for you? ccie1ab -Original Message- From: Brad Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 3:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: File needed - CPA3640 upgrade file [7:26253] Okay, Im an idiot. I just found out you dont need a file to upgrade this router to a normal 3640...CCIE's are allowed one dumb question a year, arent they??? :) thanks, -Brad Ellis CCIE#5796 (R&S / Security) Network Learning Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] ""Brad Ellis"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Does anyone have the CPA3640 upgrade file? I've got the other CPA upgrade > files, but Im missing that one. Email me offlist if you do. > > thanks, > -Brad Ellis > CCIE#5796 (R&S / Security) > Network Learning Inc > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26770&t=26253 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Convert Voice T1 to Fram-Relay T1? [7:25063]
Call Ma Bell and get them to move the copper to a new connection. ccie1ab -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 10:14 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Convert Voice T1 to Fram-Relay T1? [7:25063] Is it possible to convert a voice T1 to a frame-relay T1 ? Thanks __ Do You Yahoo!? Find a job, post your resume. http://careers.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=25127&t=25063 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT:need cisco equipments [7:25045]
Export restrictions...Can't sell Cisco gear into that part of the world (from the US). Must be why he sends this daily. ccie1ab -Original Message- From: Dennis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 7:48 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: OT:need cisco equipments [7:25045] We see your request... you don't have to post it every day thank you very much... contact your local Cisco reseller... -- -=Repy to group only... no personal=- ""farhan ahmed"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > any one wish to sale cisco equipments pls cont me with model serial no > and prices > > delievery will be in united arab emirates, abudhabi > > can pay via visa and escrow or through a friend in NJ usa > > thnx > > farhan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=25126&t=25045 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Redundancy between 6506 with a single sup. eng. each box? [7:25121]
My suggestion is to set up the access switches with 2 GBICs. One for Distro switch B and one for Distro switch C. If one of the Distro switches fail, you will automatically be routed to the other Distro switch. Again, make sure you're trunking between the links so any VLANs will still work. Make sure the specific ports for the Access Layer uplinks are set to the VLAN that you want. If the one dies, then the other will kick in. You can apply different weight to the links if you want to try to balance the traffic between the two switches (probably a smart idea). How big is this network?? ccie1ab -Original Message- From: Thomas N. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 11:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Redundancy between 6506 with a single sup. eng. each box? [7:25028] Hi Group, I have this scenario and wonder if it is possible to setup the topology with redundancy. I have a CAT 6509 acting as the core switch (say switch A), and 2 other CAT 6506 acting as the distribution switches (say switch B and C). Both switch B and C have fiber uplinks to core switch A. Switches A and B also have a redundant fiber between them. Regarding the hardware, The core 6509 has 2 supervisor engines with dual MSFCs. The two 6506 have only one supervisor engine and their MSFC DO NOT do routing at all. My concern/question is that if the supervisor engine of one of the distribution 6506 died, can access switches attached to this 6506 re-route to the redundant link? I doubt this will work because the the supervisor engine of the 6506 has all the configuration (including vlans) for the ports/trunks attached to access switches died. Is there any way to to set them up so that if the supervisor engine on one distribution 6506 dies, all ports/trunks on this 6506 can still be OK with redundant link? Putting dual supervisor engines on each 6506 will be my last solution. Thanks All! Thomas N. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=25121&t=25121 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Routing on a Stick [7:25025]
It's possible. Make sure the router has a 100BT interface and set up dot1q between the router and the switch. use sub ints on the router to define the Vans and your good to go. I hope this is what you were asking. ccie1ab -Original Message- From: Thomas N. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 10:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Routing on a Stick [7:25025] Hi All - Had anyone here setup "Routing on a Stick" between a CAT 4006 switch and a Cisco 2600/3600 router using a FastEthernet interface (RJ45) both both the 4006 and the router? Is it possible to set this up? Thanks! Thomas N. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=25120&t=25025 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
