RE: OT : 3COM 227 router [7:13449]
some basic 3Com router commands: show add setd del sh -ip route sh -port config sh -path config setd !1 -ip net=10.1.1.1 255.0.0.0.0 (set lan address) setd !X -ip net=172.168.1.1 255.255.0.0 (set wan address) (X = port number) add -ip route 0.0.0.0 172.168.1.2 1 (static route) sh layout (graphical router layout w/ports) sh -ip net sh -rip conf sh -ospf conf sh -sys conf just put a question mark after any command get the parameters. Rob Provost -Original Message- From: Charles Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 10:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT : 3COM 227 router [7:13449] Hi all, I need to configure 3com 227 router. Reference manual is not available on 3com web site. Can anyone point me the link how to get those ? or any expert can highlight some of the commands to me ? _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13494&t=13449 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
3Com does not play well with Cisco & RIPv2 [7:13900]
> We have a Frame Relay network with 3Com and Cisco routers. The core > routers are 3Com PathBuilders S500 series. All routers are configured > for RIP version 2 (VLSM). All of the 3Com router's RIP routes show up > fine in the Pathbuilder's RIP table. The Cisco router's RIP routes > show up, then "garbage out"(show as unreachable), then show up again, > then "garbage out" , etc. Our current work around is to add static > routes to the Pathbuilders for all Cisco routers. > > Does anyone have any info on this issue? > > Any help is greatly appreciated. > > Thanks, > Robert Provost Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13900&t=13900 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Frame Relay - slow link? overutilized? [7:14163]
We have a frame relay network with some sites complaining about slowness issues. Everyone is blaming the bandwidth without testing. Is there anyway I can prove what is causing the latency? Here are some outputs from the remote site router. Can someone help me decipher? Thanks, Rob Provost router#sh run Building configuration... Current configuration: ! version 12.0 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime service password-encryption ! hostname router ! enable password X XXX ! ip subnet-zero ! ! ! interface Ethernet0 ip address 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.0 ip helper-address 10.1.1.2 no ip directed-broadcast ! interface Serial0 description router DLCI 200 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast encapsulation frame-relay IETF service-module 56k clock source line service-module 56k network-type dds frame-relay lmi-type cisco ! interface Serial0.1 point-to-point description HQ DLCI 100 ip address 10.254.12.6 255.255.255.252 no ip directed-broadcast frame-relay interface-dlci 100 ! router rip version 2 network 10.0.0.0 ! ip classless ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.254.12.5 ! ! line con 0 transport input none line vty 0 4 password X X login ! end router#sh interfaces serial 0 Serial0 is up, line protocol is up Hardware is QUICC Serial (with onboard CSU/DSU) Description: router DLCI 200 MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1544 Kbit, DLY 2 usec, rely 255/255, load 1/255 Encapsulation FRAME-RELAY IETF, loopback not set, keepalive set (10 sec) LMI enq sent 401099, LMI stat recvd 400892, LMI upd recvd 0, DTE LMI up LMI enq recvd 0, LMI stat sent 0, LMI upd sent 0 LMI DLCI 1023 LMI type is CISCO frame relay DTE Broadcast queue 0/64, broadcasts sent/dropped 276474/0, interface broadcasts 2 09741 Last input 00:00:00, output 00:00:00, output hang never Last clearing of "show interface" counters never Input queue: 0/75/0 (size/max/drops); Total output drops: 0 Queueing strategy: weighted fair Output queue: 0/1000/64/0 (size/max total/threshold/drops) Conversations 0/10/256 (active/max active/max total) Reserved Conversations 0/0 (allocated/max allocated) 5 minute input rate 1000 bits/sec, 1 packets/sec 5 minute output rate 1000 bits/sec, 1 packets/sec 4243911 packets input, 2199323988 bytes, 0 no buffer Received 0 broadcasts, 0 runts, 2 giants, 0 throttles 52784 input errors, 35055 CRC, 9168 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 8561 abort 1472502 packets output, 215379554 bytes, 0 underruns 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 69 interface resets 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out 1 carrier transitions DCD=up DSR=up DTR=up RTS=up CTS=up router#sh controllers serial QUICC Serial (with onboard CSU/DSU) unit 0 idb at 0x25158A8, driver data structure at 0x251710C SCC Registers: General [GSMR]=0x2:0x0030, Protocol-specific [PSMR]=0x0 Events [SCCE]=0x, Mask [SCCM]=0x001F, Status [SCCS]=0x0006 Transmit on Demand [TODR]=0x0, Data Sync [DSR]=0x7E7E Interrupt Registers: Config [CICR]=0x00368461, Pending [CIPR]=0xC004 Mask [CIMR]=0xC812, In-srv [CISR]=0x Command register [CR]=0x6C0 Port A [PADIR]=0x, [PAPAR]=0xCCC3 [PAODR]=0x, [PADAT]=0xF5FE Port B [PBDIR]=0x00F13F, [PBPAR]=0x0010CE [PBODR]=0x00, [PBDAT]=0x034ADD Port C [PCDIR]=0x000A, [PCPAR]=0x [PCSO]=0x0830, [PCDAT]=0x03C4, [PCINT]=0x SCC GENERAL PARAMETER RAM (at 0xFF00F00) Rx BD Base [RBASE]=0x560, Fn Code [RFCR]=0x18 Tx BD Base [TBASE]=0x5A0, Fn Code [TFCR]=0x18 Max Rx Buff Len [MRBLR]=1528 Rx State [RSTATE]=0x18008240, BD Ptr [RBPTR]=0x590 Tx State [TSTATE]=0x18000348, BD Ptr [TBPTR]=0x5A0 SCC HDLC PARAMETER RAM (at 0xFF00F38) CRC Preset [C_PRES]=0x, Mask [C_MASK]=0xF0B8 Errors: CRC [CRCEC]=0, Aborts [ABTSC]=1, Discards [DISFC]=0 Nonmatch Addr Cntr [NMARC]=0 Retry Count [RETRC]=0 Max Frame Length [MFLR]=1526 Rx Int Threshold [RFTHR]=0, Frame Cnt [RFCNT]=63837 User-defined Address /// User-defined Address Mask 0x buffer size 1524 BRGC1=101B0, BRGC2=0, BRGC3=0, BRGC4=0 modem_signal_addr FF01566 MASK: DSR=1, DTR=2,RTS=8.CTS=400,DCD=800 txbrgc=FF015FC, rxbrgc=FF015FC BRG [DTE]: rx_sicr_clk=7, tx_sicr_clk=6 BRG [DCE]: rx_sicr_clk=7, tx_sicr_clk=3 CLK SRC: sync=4000, async=4000 RX ring with 8 entries at 0xFF00560, Buffer size 1524 Rxhead = 0xFF00578 (3), Rxp = 0x2517134 (3) 00 pak=0x251D0E0 buf=0x279A480 status=9000 pak_size=0 01 pak=0x251CEDC buf=0x2799DC4 status=9000 pak_size=0 02 pak=0x251B99C buf=0x27953B0 status=9000 pak_size=0 03 pak=0x25AC584 buf=0x27B24B0 status=9000 pak_size=0 04 pak=0x25AD19C buf=0x27B4D18 status=9000 pak_size=0 05 pak=0x25AC788 buf=0x27B2B6C status=9000 pak_size=0 06 pak=0x25AC380 buf=0x27B1DF4 status=9000 pak_size=0 07 pak=0x251CCD8 buf=0x2799708 status=B000 pak_size=0 TX ring with 2 entries at 0xFF005A0, tx_count = 1 tx_head = 0xFF005A0 (0), head_txp = 0x2517184 (0) tx_tail = 0xFF005A8 (1), tail_t
RE: Frame Relay - slow link? overutilized? [7:14163]
Here is the sh int after cleared counters and 5 minute wait. We have 320+ sites. Most sites are 56k lines, some frac T1, some DSL. Most have one PVC back to HQ. HQ has three routers on the Frame w/a total of 7 T1s. Thanks for your help, Rob router#sh int Ethernet0 is up, line protocol is up Hardware is QUICC Ethernet, address is 0001.42a5.c6ec (bia 0001.42a5.c6ec) Internet address is 10.253.X.X/24 MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1 Kbit, DLY 1000 usec, rely 255/255, load 1/255 Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set, keepalive set (10 sec) ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00 Last input 00:00:01, output 00:00:00, output hang never Last clearing of "show interface" counters 00:07:13 Queueing strategy: fifo Output queue 0/40, 0 drops; input queue 0/75, 0 drops 5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec 5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec 186 packets input, 19777 bytes, 0 no buffer Received 177 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles 0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 0 abort 0 input packets with dribble condition detected 438 packets output, 207446 bytes, 0 underruns 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 0 interface resets 0 babbles, 0 late collision, 0 deferred 0 lost carrier, 0 no carrier 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out Serial0 is up, line protocol is up Hardware is QUICC Serial (with onboard CSU/DSU) Description: router DLCI 200 MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1544 Kbit, DLY 2 usec, rely 255/255, load 1/255 Encapsulation FRAME-RELAY IETF, loopback not set, keepalive set (10 sec) LMI enq sent 44, LMI stat recvd 44, LMI upd recvd 0, DTE LMI up LMI enq recvd 0, LMI stat sent 0, LMI upd sent 0 LMI DLCI 1023 LMI type is CISCO frame relay DTE Broadcast queue 0/64, broadcasts sent/dropped 25/0, interface broadcasts 18 Last input 00:00:00, output 00:00:00, output hang never Last clearing of "show interface" counters 00:07:14 Input queue: 0/75/0 (size/max/drops); Total output drops: 0 Queueing strategy: weighted fair Output queue: 0/1000/64/0 (size/max total/threshold/drops) Conversations 0/10/256 (active/max active/max total) Reserved Conversations 0/0 (allocated/max allocated) 5 minute input rate 1000 bits/sec, 1 packets/sec 5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec 421 packets input, 167457 bytes, 0 no buffer Received 0 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles 0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 0 abort 117 packets output, 9694 bytes, 0 underruns 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 0 interface resets 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out 0 carrier transitions DCD=up DSR=up DTR=up RTS=up CTS=up Serial0.1 is up, line protocol is up Hardware is QUICC Serial (with onboard CSU/DSU) Description: HQ DLCI 100 Internet address is 10.254.X.X/30 MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1544 Kbit, DLY 2 usec, rely 255/255, load 1/255 Encapsulation FRAME-RELAY IETF -Original Message- From: Farhan Ahmed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 10:52 AM To: 'Provost, Robert'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Frame Relay - slow link? overutilized? [7:14163] Importance: High send me sh int clear counters before sending and wait for 5 min to get new stats your router is not receiving lmi packets properly how many sites u have? Num Status Enq. Sent 401101 Num Status msgs Rcvd 400894 > Num Update Status Rcvd 0 Num Status Timeouts 2 Best Regards Have A Good Day!! *** Farhan Ahmed* MCSE+I, MCP Win2k, CCDA, CCNA, CSE Network Engineer Mideast Data Systems Abudhabi Uae. *** Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message or Attachments hereto. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, Conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the Official business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor Endorsed by it. > -Original Message- > From: Provost, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 6:18 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Frame Relay - slow link? overutilized? [7:14163] > > > We have a frame relay network with some sites complaining > about slowness > issues. Everyone is blaming the bandwidth without testing. > Is there anyway > I can prove what is causing the latency? Here are some > outputs from the > remote site router. Can someone help me decipher? > > Thanks, > Rob Provost > > router#sh run > Building configuration... > > Current configuration: > ! > version 12.0 > service timestamps debug uptime > service timestamps log uptime > service password-encryption &g
RE: Frame Relay - slow link? overutilized? [7:14163]
scenerio - site A is on a 56k line using 10% of the bandwidth. If you add more users and are now at 70% bandwidth, do the users notice slower connections even though the line is not over utilized and you are getting no FECN/BECN, or dropped packets? -Original Message- From: Farhan Ahmed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 12:03 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Frame Relay - slow link? overutilized? [7:14163] auh-- u have a big setup.. most of the frame relay problem happens of remote site pushing too much data that the central site can handle u r using default queing strategy. and u send me only the remote site config u need to ccalculate what is the total cir and Be(excess bust speed of all remote sites comming into your vc u need to provide fine details Best Regards Have A Good Day!! *** Farhan Ahmed* MCSE+I, MCP Win2k, CCDA, CCNA, CSE Network Engineer Mideast Data Systems Abudhabi Uae. *** Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message or Attachments hereto. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, Conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the Official business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor Endorsed by it. > -Original Message- > From: Provost, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 7:22 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Frame Relay - slow link? overutilized? [7:14163] > > > Here is the sh int after cleared counters and 5 minute wait. > We have 320+ > sites. Most sites are 56k lines, some frac T1, some DSL. > Most have one PVC > back to HQ. HQ has three routers on the Frame w/a total of 7 T1s. > > Thanks for your help, > > Rob > > > router#sh int > Ethernet0 is up, line protocol is up > Hardware is QUICC Ethernet, address is 0001.42a5.c6ec (bia > 0001.42a5.c6ec) > Internet address is 10.253.X.X/24 > MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1 Kbit, DLY 1000 usec, rely 255/255, > load 1/255 > Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set, keepalive set (10 sec) > ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00 > Last input 00:00:01, output 00:00:00, output hang never > Last clearing of "show interface" counters 00:07:13 > Queueing strategy: fifo > Output queue 0/40, 0 drops; input queue 0/75, 0 drops > 5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec > 5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec > 186 packets input, 19777 bytes, 0 no buffer > Received 177 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles > 0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 0 abort > 0 input packets with dribble condition detected > 438 packets output, 207446 bytes, 0 underruns > 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 0 interface resets > 0 babbles, 0 late collision, 0 deferred > 0 lost carrier, 0 no carrier > 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out > Serial0 is up, line protocol is up > Hardware is QUICC Serial (with onboard CSU/DSU) > Description: router DLCI 200 > MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1544 Kbit, DLY 2 usec, rely 255/255, > load 1/255 > Encapsulation FRAME-RELAY IETF, loopback not set, keepalive > set (10 sec) > LMI enq sent 44, LMI stat recvd 44, LMI upd recvd 0, DTE LMI up > LMI enq recvd 0, LMI stat sent 0, LMI upd sent 0 > LMI DLCI 1023 LMI type is CISCO frame relay DTE > Broadcast queue 0/64, broadcasts sent/dropped 25/0, > interface broadcasts > 18 > Last input 00:00:00, output 00:00:00, output hang never > Last clearing of "show interface" counters 00:07:14 > Input queue: 0/75/0 (size/max/drops); Total output drops: 0 > Queueing strategy: weighted fair > Output queue: 0/1000/64/0 (size/max total/threshold/drops) > Conversations 0/10/256 (active/max active/max total) > Reserved Conversations 0/0 (allocated/max allocated) > 5 minute input rate 1000 bits/sec, 1 packets/sec > 5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec > 421 packets input, 167457 bytes, 0 no buffer > Received 0 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles > 0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 0 abort > 117 packets output, 9694 bytes, 0 underruns > 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 0 interface resets > 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out > 0 carrier transitions > DCD=up DSR=up DTR=up RTS=up CTS=up > > Serial0.1 is up, line protocol is up > Hardware is QUICC Serial (with onboard CSU/DSU) > Description: HQ DLCI 100 > Internet address is 10.254.X.X/30 > MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1544 Kbit, DLY 200
RE: Frame Relay - slow link? overutilized? [7:14163]
I'm confused. My remote site LMI type is Cisco, HQ is ANSI. I am passing LMI and the site is up, just slow. If my LMI type was mismatched, wouldn't it not work at all? I cleared the counters and over the last couple of hours have received no CRCs, FECNs, BECNs, dropped packets, etc. Here is some statistics from my Frame Relay provider. Their reporting also shows no FECNs, BECNs, discarded packets, etc. PVC Usage to CIR Ratio Exceptions Hour Day %Peak 5 Min Crit Thresh 6Thu290.80150.00 7Wed150.11150.00 12 Tue150.41150.00 12 Fri173.33150.00 15 Mon172.14150.00 16 Thu150.92150.00 Any suggestions? TIA, Rob -Original Message- From: Jim Dixon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 11:40 AM To: Provost, Robert Subject: RE: Frame Relay - slow link? overutilized? [7:14163] Robert, What kind of router is at HQ? Is it the one below? What kind is at the remote end? Is IT the one below? Which end are we looking at in other words? Are Both Routers CISCO? Is the Frame Relay Network providing CISCO LMI? (that is my FIRST question) If so then check cables. CRC's are most often a layer one issue. Jim -Original Message- From: Provost, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 10:22 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Frame Relay - slow link? overutilized? [7:14163] Here is the sh int after cleared counters and 5 minute wait. We have 320+ sites. Most sites are 56k lines, some frac T1, some DSL. Most have one PVC back to HQ. HQ has three routers on the Frame w/a total of 7 T1s. Thanks for your help, Rob router#sh int Ethernet0 is up, line protocol is up Hardware is QUICC Ethernet, address is 0001.42a5.c6ec (bia 0001.42a5.c6ec) Internet address is 10.253.X.X/24 MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1 Kbit, DLY 1000 usec, rely 255/255, load 1/255 Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set, keepalive set (10 sec) ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00 Last input 00:00:01, output 00:00:00, output hang never Last clearing of "show interface" counters 00:07:13 Queueing strategy: fifo Output queue 0/40, 0 drops; input queue 0/75, 0 drops 5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec 5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec 186 packets input, 19777 bytes, 0 no buffer Received 177 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles 0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 0 abort 0 input packets with dribble condition detected 438 packets output, 207446 bytes, 0 underruns 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 0 interface resets 0 babbles, 0 late collision, 0 deferred 0 lost carrier, 0 no carrier 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out Serial0 is up, line protocol is up Hardware is QUICC Serial (with onboard CSU/DSU) Description: router DLCI 200 MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1544 Kbit, DLY 2 usec, rely 255/255, load 1/255 Encapsulation FRAME-RELAY IETF, loopback not set, keepalive set (10 sec) LMI enq sent 44, LMI stat recvd 44, LMI upd recvd 0, DTE LMI up LMI enq recvd 0, LMI stat sent 0, LMI upd sent 0 LMI DLCI 1023 LMI type is CISCO frame relay DTE Broadcast queue 0/64, broadcasts sent/dropped 25/0, interface broadcasts 18 Last input 00:00:00, output 00:00:00, output hang never Last clearing of "show interface" counters 00:07:14 Input queue: 0/75/0 (size/max/drops); Total output drops: 0 Queueing strategy: weighted fair Output queue: 0/1000/64/0 (size/max total/threshold/drops) Conversations 0/10/256 (active/max active/max total) Reserved Conversations 0/0 (allocated/max allocated) 5 minute input rate 1000 bits/sec, 1 packets/sec 5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec 421 packets input, 167457 bytes, 0 no buffer Received 0 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles 0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 0 abort 117 packets output, 9694 bytes, 0 underruns 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 0 interface resets 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out 0 carrier transitions DCD=up DSR=up DTR=up RTS=up CTS=up Serial0.1 is up, line protocol is up Hardware is QUICC Serial (with onboard CSU/DSU) Description: HQ DLCI 100 Internet address is 10.254.X.X/30 MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1544 Kbit, DLY 2 usec, rely 255/255, load 1/255 Encapsulation FRAME-RELAY IETF -Original Message- From: Farhan Ahmed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 10:52 AM To: 'Provost, Robert'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Frame Relay - slow link? overutilized? [7:14163] Importance: High send me sh int clear counters before sending and wait for 5 min to get new stats your router is not receiving lmi packets properly how many sites u have? Num Status Enq. Sent 401101 Num Status msgs Rcvd 400894 > Num Update
checkpoint list? [7:14359]
Sorry, off topic -- Does anyone know of a list like this for Checkpoint? Thanks for your help, Rob Provost Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14359&t=14359 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unknown password - delete config [7:14813]
I have a 1601 that has a password on it that nobody knows. I don't care about the config. How can I get this config/password deleted and back to factory defaults? Thanks, Rob Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14813&t=14813 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One interface-two IPs-& NAT? [7:15460]
Is this possible? Can I put two IPs on an Ethernet port of a 1601(lets say 10.1.1.1 & 128.5.1.1), have the users come into the router on the 10 network, NAT to a 128.5.1.X address and go out the same port? I'm looking for a way to NAT with the equipment I have. The internet router is managed by the ISP so I have no access. I have the extra 1601 with one Ethernet port. The above is my idea to get this to work. Any other suggestions? TIA, Rob Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=15460&t=15460 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
3524s and Spanning tree [7:17725]
Using the GigaStack GBICs and cables you can cluster up to 16 3524 switches. Is there a limit to how many switches you can run spanning tree on with the GigaStack GBICs? For some reason I thought I read 7 as a limit, but I cannot verify that. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks, Rob Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=17725&t=17725 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nat confusion [7:26484]
I am trying to setup NAT translation. here is the setup. I want to NAT any local address, to the IP address of my external ethernet interface (many-to-one). 10.0.0.0 is the internal network. 192.168.1.1 is the IP address of the external ethernet port. I am on the cisco page and I am confused. I have done NAT on 3Com routers, but never on Cisco. Any config help would be appreciated. Thanks, Rob Provost Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26484&t=26484 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FW: Nat confusion [7:26484]
Ignore this post. I figured it out. For anyone who is interested: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/556/12.html#2 Thanks -Original Message- From: Provost, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 11:27 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Nat confusion [7:26484] I am trying to setup NAT translation. here is the setup. I want to NAT any local address, to the IP address of my external ethernet interface (many-to-one). 10.0.0.0 is the internal network. 192.168.1.1 is the IP address of the external ethernet port. I am on the cisco page and I am confused. I have done NAT on 3Com routers, but never on Cisco. Any config help would be appreciated. Thanks, Rob Provost Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26498&t=26484 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
display route table in numerical order? [7:27541]
Could be a silly question, but I'll ask anyway. Is there a way to display the routing table in numerical order? That would make it a lot easier to find routes when displaying the list. Thanks for your help. Robert Provost Data Communications Engineer Genesis Health Ventures Phone: 610-925-1147 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27541&t=27541 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ameritrain for CCNP cert classes [7:28111]
Does anyone have experience with Ameritrain for CCNP certification classes? They offer an 8 week course (12 hours a week) for the CCNP track (all 4 tests). Hands on Cisco equipment and only 8 students max per class. I have heard their radio commercials, but don't know anyone who has used them. If anyone has any info, please let me know. Thanks, Rob Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28111&t=28111 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT - How to get MAC address of remote device when I have the IP [7:28408]
Sorry for the off topic post. Does anyone know how I can determine the MAC address of a remote device when I do have the IP? I ping it but my arp cache only shows the local addresses. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks. Robert Provost Data Communications Engineer Genesis Health Ventures Phone: 610-925-1147 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28408&t=28408 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT - How to get MAC address of remote device when I have [7:28417]
Unfortunatly the remote router is a 3Com. -Original Message- From: Logan, Harold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 11:27 AM To: Provost, Robert; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OT - How to get MAC address of remote device when I have the IP [7:28408] You'll need access to the router that's local to the remote host. View that router's ARP cache (show ip arp, etc.) and you should be able to find it. hth, Hal Logan Network Specialist / Adjunct Faculty Computing and Engineering Technology Manatee Community College > -Original Message----- > From: Provost, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 10:46 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: OT - How to get MAC address of remote device when I > have the IP > [7:28408] > > > Sorry for the off topic post. > > Does anyone know how I can determine the MAC address of a > remote device when > I do have the IP? I ping it but my arp cache only shows the local > addresses. > > Any help would be appreciated. > > Thanks. > > Robert Provost > Data Communications Engineer > Genesis Health Ventures > Phone: 610-925-1147 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28417&t=28417 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco 1538M Issues [7:30787]
We have purchased several 1538Ms and have had some issues. Some of them seems to go up and down randomly. We have purchased 100+ and just the last couple have had this problem. We are thinking it is the latest software version or just a bad batch from manufacturing. Anyone else having problems with this hub? Thanks, Rob Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30787&t=30787 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
3524 - Gigabit Etherchannel [7:21149]
Is Gigabit Etherchannel available on the 3524 and/or 4006? I have some documentation and it only mentions the Catalyst 5000 line. TIA Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=21149&t=21149 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Nationwide Toll Free Outage [7:21859]
This is a notification that all major carriers, like AT&T and MCI are experiencing a widespread problem with people dialing 800 #'s. Right now it is affecting mainly Ohio, Wisconsin, Kentucky, Illinois and the West Coast. When dialing an 800 # from one of the above mentioned locations, you receive a fast busy signal. -Original Message- From: Jeremy Felt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 11:45 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Fw: Nationwide Toll Free Outage [7:21859] Hi all, This message was forwarded to me, I was just wondering if anybody knew anything further about it. I know not everybody is affected, because we are still getting limited calls on 800 numbers, but we aren't able to dial any at all. - Jeremy > The centralized database (known as "SMS") that handles the routing for all > toll free numbers in the US is down, so consequently all toll free lines in > the country are non-operational. This is *not* carrier-specific... it is > affecting all long distance carriers. > > Unfortunately, I have no additional information at this time. I will pass > along additional information when I receive it. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=21868&t=21859 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
