RE: Cisco IP Telephony Certification.... [7:59274]

2002-12-17 Thread Quek, Steven
Hi,

So far I have not heard any response, appreciate greatly
if someone can share some lights on this topic.

Thank you..


With regards
Steven Quek
HP Network Ser vices
Hewlett Packard Singapore Sales (Pte.) Ltd.
DID: 65-6374 9369
Mobile: 65-9797 4526


-Original Message-
From: Quek, Steven 
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 2:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Cisco IP Telephony Certification [7:59274]


Hi,

I believe this has been posted before, I wish to pursue
the Cisco IP Telephony track. Like to check which Cisco Press book must I get
hold to read up for the tests.

From the Cisco URL they have revised and named it as Enterprise Voice Over
Data Design.
 Deploying QoS For Enterprise Network. These 2 tests you must passed to
get Specialized.

Hopefully you can let me know the passing marks and time needed for the
tests.

Appreciate anyone out there can provide me other valuable information so
that I can
work on it.

Thanks again  have a Merry Christmas.

With regards
Steven Quek




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59367t=59274
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Cisco IP Telephony Certification.... [7:59274]

2002-12-17 Thread Quek, Steven
Hi Juan, Munit  Binh,

Appreciate very much for the information.

Merry Christmas to all.

With regards
Steven Quek
HP Network Ser vices
Hewlett Packard Singapore Sales (Pte.) Ltd.
DID: 65-6374 9369
Mobile: 65-9797 4526


-Original Message-
From: Juan Blanco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 12:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Cisco IP Telephony Certification [7:59274]


Steve,
The following will be a start for your goal..

CIPT 9E0-402
Cisco IP Telephony by ciscopress - David Lovell
Cisco IP Telephony Network Design Guide
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/voice/ip_tele/network/
Cisco IP Telephony Solution Guide
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/788/solution_guide/index.html

DQoS 9E0-601
DQoS is all QoS, pretty straight forward. Hands on experience helped quite a
bit. There is a QoS book from Cisco Press, the book is a few years old and
is poorly layed out. The IOS 12.2 QoS guide follows the exam blueprint
pretty closely and is a great reference.
Cisco AVVID QoS Guide
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/voice/ip_tele/avvidqos/index
.htm
Cisco IOS QoS Solutions Guide 12.2
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fqos
_c/

CVOICE 9E0423
Cisco Voice over Frame relay, ATM and IP by ciscopress - Steve McQuery
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12cgcr/voice
_c/vcprt1/index.htm

Be aware that for this kind of certification you need to find as many pdfs
as possible related to the topic because the technology is still going
trough many changes The order of taking the test I recommend is the
following:
DQoS --- CVOICE --- CIPT

Good luck,


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Quek, Steven
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 9:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Cisco IP Telephony Certification [7:59274]


Hi,

So far I have not heard any response, appreciate greatly
if someone can share some lights on this topic.

Thank you..


With regards
Steven Quek
HP Network Ser vices
Hewlett Packard Singapore Sales (Pte.) Ltd.
DID: 65-6374 9369
Mobile: 65-9797 4526


-Original Message-
From: Quek, Steven
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 2:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Cisco IP Telephony Certification [7:59274]


Hi,

I believe this has been posted before, I wish to pursue
the Cisco IP Telephony track. Like to check which Cisco Press book must I
get
hold to read up for the tests.

From the Cisco URL they have revised and named it as Enterprise Voice Over
Data Design.
 Deploying QoS For Enterprise Network. These 2 tests you must passed to
get Specialized.

Hopefully you can let me know the passing marks and time needed for the
tests.

Appreciate anyone out there can provide me other valuable information so
that I can
work on it.

Thanks again  have a Merry Christmas.

With regards
Steven Quek




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59423t=59274
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Cisco IP Telephony Certification.... [7:59274]

2002-12-15 Thread Quek, Steven
Hi,

I believe this has been posted before, I wish to pursue
the Cisco IP Telephony track. Like to check which Cisco Press book must I get
hold to read up for the tests.

From the Cisco URL they have revised and named it as Enterprise Voice Over
Data Design.
 Deploying QoS For Enterprise Network. These 2 tests you must passed to
get Specialized.

Hopefully you can let me know the passing marks and time needed for the
tests.

Appreciate anyone out there can provide me other valuable information so
that I can
work on it.

Thanks again  have a Merry Christmas.

With regards
Steven Quek




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59274t=59274
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: how to find whether pix is running restricted or [7:54522]

2002-09-29 Thread Quek, Steven

hi,

I understand Failover feature is only available in the unrestricted
version. 

With regards
Steven Quek
Compaq Computer Asia Pte Ltd

-Original Message-
From: Tribavan Raina [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 11:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: how to find whether pix is running restricted or unrestricted
[7:54517]


Hi there..

What is the way to find whether pix is running restricted or unrestricted
software.

According to Cisco PIX FAQ, the sh ver command gives the answer.I executed
sh ver  command in PIX but cudnt find the answer.

Cisco Secure PIX Firewall Version 5.1(2)
Compiled on Tue 16-May-00 16:09 by bhochuli

x up 93 days 16 hours

Hardware:   PIX-515, 64 MB RAM, CPU Pentium 200 MHz
Flash i28F640J5 @ 0x300, 16MB
BIOS Flash AT29C257 @ 0xfffd8000, 32KB

0: ethernet0: address is 0050.54ff.5208, irq 10
1: ethernet1: address is 0050.54ff.5209, irq 7
2: ethernet2: address is 00d0.b76b.31bd, irq 11

Licensed Features:
Failover:   Enabled
VPN-DES:Disabled
VPN-3DES:   Disabled
Maximum Interfaces: 6

Serial Number: 480150365 (0x1c9e835d)
Activation Key: 0xc98e18e9 0x85532576 0x134dfd47 0xd6be16cc


TIA

Trib




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=54522t=54522
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: CIT exam [7:43100]

2002-05-02 Thread Quek, Steven

Hi all,

Just to be sure for there are 2 books for CIT,
may I know which Cisco Press Book is for the CIT exam?

Thank you  have a nice weekend.

Cheers
Steven Quek


-Original Message-
From: adam lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 9:22 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: CIT exam [7:43100]


I just took the exam today after studying for about 30 hours using the cisco
press book and the course material.  It wasn't that hard but it wasn't that
easy because some of the wording got me.

Considering what I studied, I expected more in different areas.  Oh, well, a
pass is a pass.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 3:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: CIT exam [7:43100]


I have taken the router, switching and remote access exams, and am about to
take the support exam.  I have heard from some that the CIT exam is the
easiest and I have heard from others that it is one of the hardest.  I would
like to get the boards perspective on this.  Thanks.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=43195t=43100
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Universal Dial Access Specialisation [7:37632]

2002-03-07 Thread Quek, Steven

Hi,

Like to check has anyone taken the Cisco Universal Dial Access test?

If yes, I would appreciate if you could let me know where are the reference
material
that I can pick up and study.

Thank you  have a nice weekend.

With Regards
Steven Quek




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37632t=37632
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



SpectraLink Wireless IP Phones. [7:26628]

2001-11-18 Thread Quek, Steven

Hi there,

Currently I am working on a deal on Cisco Wireless with SpectraLink IP
Phones.
Personally I had never touch on these before, anyone out there care to
give
some comment and share with me your experience with these
implementation.

Your information is greatly appreciated.

Thank you  have a nice day.

With regards
Steven Quek




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=26628t=26628
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Cisco Security Exam [7:19249]

2001-09-10 Thread Quek, Steven

Hi,

This has been a great Cisco study site and enjoy most of it for the abundant
of info that is shared
on the discussion.

Currently I am preparing for the Cisco Security Track and seeking some
advise.
I had been to Cisco site and there seems to have 4 exams to pass:

1) MCNS
2) Cisco Secure PIX Firewall Advanced (CSPFA)
3) Cisco Secure Intrusion Detention System (CSIDS)
4) Cisco Secure VPN (CSVPN)

Question is that must I pass the above exams? Need some confirmation on this

Next I would appreciate greatly if anyone can recommend me the books to read
up for each of
the exam.

Thank you very much  have a nice day.

With regards
Steven Quek
Compaq Computer Asia Pte Ltd
Professional Service
Main: 65-786 2288
DID: 65-580 5176
Mobile: 65-9797 4526




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19249t=19249
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Cisco Security Exam [7:19249]

2001-09-10 Thread Quek, Steven

Hi Matthew,

Thank you very much for your clear  precise advise.
It is really a comfort feeling to have such prompt response.

With regards
Steven Quek
Compaq Computer Asia Pte Ltd
Professional Service
Main: 65-786 2288
DID: 65-580 5176
Mobile: 65-9797 4526


-Original Message-
From: Matthew Crane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 7:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Cisco Security Exam [7:19249]


Hi Steven

To do the full Cisco Security thing you must take 5 exams as follows and
preferably in this order
MCNS
Pix Firewall Fundamentals
Pix Firewall Advanced
Cisco Secure VPN
Cisco Intrusion Detection

The reason for this approach as I always tell my staff  students is that
the MCNS is comprehensive and gives you a great deal of material in the
other exams, especially the area of IKE, IPsec, ISAKMP etc.

Books Cisco Press 
Managing Cisco Network Security
Designing Network Security
Cisco IOS 12.0 Network Security
Cisco Secure Internet Security Solutions

There is also the McGraw Hill Implementing Cisco Secure VPN's but that is so
full of holes and errors I would not bother. There is a book from cisco
Press on VPN's due late 2001 written by Andrew Mason  Terri Smith and if it
is half as good as Terri is as a VPN course instructor then it will be well
worth the money.

The odd one out is CSIDS which requires a deal of Unix knowledge especially
Solaris, plus some Openview stuff.

The key to all the exams is understand fully IKE, ISAkmp and the security
process of why  how.

If you have not done CCNP or the BCRAN part of CCNPO then i wopuld recommend
you take a look at it as background to the IOS side of security.

Good luck and if you need any further specific info email me direct.

Quek, Steven wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
 This has been a great Cisco study site and enjoy most of it for
 the abundant
 of info that is shared
 on the discussion.
 
 Currently I am preparing for the Cisco Security Track and
 seeking some
 advise.
 I had been to Cisco site and there seems to have 4 exams to
 pass:
 
 1) MCNS
 2) Cisco Secure PIX Firewall Advanced (CSPFA)
 3) Cisco Secure Intrusion Detention System (CSIDS)
 4) Cisco Secure VPN (CSVPN)
 
 Question is that must I pass the above exams? Need some
 confirmation on this
 
 Next I would appreciate greatly if anyone can recommend me the
 books to read
 up for each of
 the exam.
 
 Thank you very much  have a nice day.
 
 With regards
 Steven Quek
 Compaq Computer Asia Pte Ltd
 Professional Service
 Main: 65-786 2288
 DID: 65-580 5176
 Mobile: 65-9797 4526




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19347t=19249
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: port block unicast and multicast [7:12052]

2001-07-12 Thread Quek, Steven

Hi,

I am glad that this topic is discussed here. In fact currently I am doing
a project that is trying to make use of the Port Monitoring/SPAN
feature as a form of keepalive  duplicate traffic discovery 
with a third party product. I won't go into that detail.

I had read the portion of info at the directed web link. But would like to
confirm my doubts. I need all the valuable advise and inputs from all of
you. 

May be I am poor in my English to interpret this. Appreciate to confirm,
does that mean all Cisco Switches, be it Cat 19xx, 29xx, 5xxx, 6xxx, etc
have the similar feature of blocking Unknow Unicast  Unregistered Multicast

from forwarding through the Source port  not reaching the destination
directed ports?
The traffic is also not forwarded out of the connected port to the connected
neighbouring
port?

Source Switch Port1Router-WAN
|   ^
Mirrored Traffic---|   |
|Eth
  Destine Switch Port2

Based on the above diagram for simple discussion.

Does that means EIGRP routing entries will be discarded at the Switch Port1
 not updated to the Router
Ethernet port? Similar CDP, Multicast Video streaming, Mainframe
application, ...etc, will not able
to pass through the Monitored port?

Lastly, is there a way to enable all traffic to flow through the Monitored
switch port?

Hope to hear some comments on this. Apprecaite the inputs.

Cheers.

regard
Steven Quek

-Original Message-
From: Marty Adkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 11:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: port block unicast and multicast [7:12052]


Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
 
 Has anyone seen this and is there a workaround?
 
 On a Catalyst 1900 switch enterprise edition, the software has decided
that
 one of my ports should not flood unknown unicast or multicast. This
 wouldn't be a problem except that the port is also my monitor port for
 sniffing packets, and I WANT to see unknown unicast and multicast. I'm
 trying to see EIGRP, CDP, etc. from a router connected to another port.
The
 monitoring is working, but I'm not seeing multicasts.
 
 SwitchA#show int e 0/1
 Hardware is Built-in 10Base-T
 Address is 00B0.6426.7941
 MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1 Kbits
 802.1d STP State:  Forwarding Forward Transitions:  1
 Unknown unicast flooding: Disabled
 Unregistered multicast flooding: Disabled
 Duplex setting: Half duplex
 Back pressure: Disabled
 
 See how it says that unknown unicast and unregistered multicast are
 disabled? It doesn't say that for any of the other ports.
[snip]

Priscilla,
This is apparently an intentional side effect of enabling a port for
SPAN/port monitoring, according to:
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/28201900/1928v8x/19icg8x
/19icweb.htm#xtocid482036
So your analyzer would get only broadcasts until you configure it to
monitor (copy) other ports on the switch.  Those other ports will be
getting unknowns and multicast so your monitor port will see a copy.

I agree that this behavior is different than all the other Cisco switches
including XLs, 4xxx, 5xxx, and 6xxx.

- Marty




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=12096t=12052
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: port block unicast and multicast [7:12052]

2001-07-12 Thread Quek, Steven

Hi,

So far I have not heard any response for this.
Anyone care to provide the info?

Thanks in advance.

With regards
Steven Quek

-Original Message-
From: Quek, Steven 
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 6:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: port block unicast and multicast [7:12052]


Hi,

I am glad that this topic is discussed here. In fact currently I am doing
a project that is trying to make use of the Port Monitoring/SPAN
feature as a form of keepalive  duplicate traffic discovery 
with a third party product. I won't go into that detail.

I had read the portion of info at the directed web link. But would like to
confirm my doubts. I need all the valuable advise and inputs from all of
you. 

May be I am poor in my English to interpret this. Appreciate to confirm,
does that mean all Cisco Switches, be it Cat 19xx, 29xx, 5xxx, 6xxx, etc
have the similar feature of blocking Unknow Unicast  Unregistered Multicast

from forwarding through the Source port  not reaching the destination
directed ports?
The traffic is also not forwarded out of the connected port to the connected
neighbouring
port?

Source Switch Port1Router-WAN
|   ^
Mirrored Traffic---|   |
|Eth
  Destine Switch Port2

Based on the above diagram for simple discussion.

Does that means EIGRP routing entries will be discarded at the Switch Port1
 not updated to the Router
Ethernet port? Similar CDP, Multicast Video streaming, Mainframe
application, ...etc, will not able
to pass through the Monitored port?

Lastly, is there a way to enable all traffic to flow through the Monitored
switch port?

Hope to hear some comments on this. Apprecaite the inputs.

Cheers.

regard
Steven Quek

-Original Message-
From: Marty Adkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 11:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: port block unicast and multicast [7:12052]


Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
 
 Has anyone seen this and is there a workaround?
 
 On a Catalyst 1900 switch enterprise edition, the software has decided
that
 one of my ports should not flood unknown unicast or multicast. This
 wouldn't be a problem except that the port is also my monitor port for
 sniffing packets, and I WANT to see unknown unicast and multicast. I'm
 trying to see EIGRP, CDP, etc. from a router connected to another port.
The
 monitoring is working, but I'm not seeing multicasts.
 
 SwitchA#show int e 0/1
 Hardware is Built-in 10Base-T
 Address is 00B0.6426.7941
 MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1 Kbits
 802.1d STP State:  Forwarding Forward Transitions:  1
 Unknown unicast flooding: Disabled
 Unregistered multicast flooding: Disabled
 Duplex setting: Half duplex
 Back pressure: Disabled
 
 See how it says that unknown unicast and unregistered multicast are
 disabled? It doesn't say that for any of the other ports.
[snip]

Priscilla,
This is apparently an intentional side effect of enabling a port for
SPAN/port monitoring, according to:
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/28201900/1928v8x/19icg8x
/19icweb.htm#xtocid482036
So your analyzer would get only broadcasts until you configure it to
monitor (copy) other ports on the switch.  Those other ports will be
getting unknowns and multicast so your monitor port will see a copy.

I agree that this behavior is different than all the other Cisco switches
including XLs, 4xxx, 5xxx, and 6xxx.

- Marty




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=12161t=12052
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: port block unicast and multicast [7:12052]

2001-07-12 Thread Quek, Steven

Hi,

Priscilla, thank you very much for the info.

I was hoping for your response for I always enjoy your email on the mailing
discussion.
In fact I enjoy reading your DCN book. It is informative  straight to the
point.
In fact I used for reference for some of my propsed solution.

The regional project I am handling was having problem with Port Monitoring
and the customer has various types of Cisco switch. I faced this problem
for the Cat6000 when SPAN was enabled. I guess I need to study further
how to configure the SPAN to I understand the SPAN work on the Cat6000.

When SPAN was enabled on Cat6000, the LAN EIGRP routing entries were
lost on the Router Ethernet port. I guess I have to configure the CAT6000
to forward the EIGRP multicast traffic and other types of traffic. Thus,
this is not a workable solution for my customer to go through all these.

Thank you  have a great weekend.

With regards
Steven Quek


-Original Message-
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 1:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: port block unicast and multicast [7:12052]


See some comments below.

At 06:01 AM 7/12/01, Quek, Steven wrote:
Hi,

I am glad that this topic is discussed here. In fact currently I am doing
a project that is trying to make use of the Port Monitoring/SPAN
feature as a form of keepalive  duplicate traffic discovery
with a third party product. I won't go into that detail.

I had read the portion of info at the directed web link. But would like to
confirm my doubts. I need all the valuable advise and inputs from all of
you.

May be I am poor in my English to interpret this. Appreciate to confirm,
does that mean all Cisco Switches, be it Cat 19xx, 29xx, 5xxx, 6xxx, etc
have the similar feature of blocking Unknow Unicast  Unregistered
Multicast

I have only seen this with the Cat 1900. You will need to check Cisco 
documentation for the other switches. I checked the 6xxx and 5xxx 
documentation and monitoring multicasts is enabled by default for those 
switches. Multicasts are not blocked.

http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat6000/sw_6_2/confg_gd/
span.htm#xtocid147020

Monitoring multicasts is configurable. See this command:

set span {src_mod/src_ports | src_vlans | sc0} {dest_mod/dest_port} [rx | 
tx | both] [inpkts {enable | disable}] [learning {enable | disable}] 
[multicast {enable | disable}]
[filter vlans...] [create]



from forwarding through the Source port  not reaching the destination
directed ports?
The traffic is also not forwarded out of the connected port to the
connected
neighbouring
port?

 Source Switch Port1Router-WAN
 |   ^
Mirrored Traffic---|   |
 |Eth
   Destine Switch Port2

Based on the above diagram for simple discussion.

Does that means EIGRP routing entries will be discarded at the Switch Port1
 not updated to the Router

I am assuming that EIGRP multicasts arrive from the router at switch port 1 
in your diagram, and port 1 is the monitored (mirrored) port and port 2 is 
the monitor port where the analyzer resides. You will not see the EIGRP 
multicasts on the destination (monitor) port 2 when using a Cat 1900. The 
EIGRP multicasts should go out all other ports on the switch (depending on 
VLAN and other configurations.) So, it won't cause any operational problems 
on a network. It just makes monitoring difficult.

Note that EIGRP uses multicasts for hellos. It sends routing updates 
directly to neighbors, so you would see those on the monitor port.

Ethernet port? Similar CDP, Multicast Video streaming, Mainframe
application, ...etc, will not able
to pass through the Monitored port?

I also do not see CDP on my monitor port on my Cat 1900. I haven't tried 
multicast video or other applications.


Lastly, is there a way to enable all traffic to flow through the Monitored
switch port?

Well, it blocks unregistered multicasts. Theoretically you could 
register the port to receive multicasts. I don't know how, though. IGMP?

Sorry, I don't know more about this. I'm just discovering the problems 
myself. But I think it's just a Cat 1900 problem.

Priscilla


Hope to hear some comments on this. Apprecaite the inputs.

Cheers.

regard
Steven Quek

-Original Message-
From: Marty Adkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 11:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: port block unicast and multicast [7:12052]


Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
 
  Has anyone seen this and is there a workaround?
 
  On a Catalyst 1900 switch enterprise edition, the software has decided
that
  one of my ports should not flood unknown unicast or multicast. This
  wouldn't be a problem except that the port is also my monitor port for
  sniffing packets, and I WANT to see unknown unicast and multicast. I'm
  trying to see EIGRP, CDP, etc. from a router connected to another port.
The
  monitoring

RE: Past my written on 3rd attempt. [7:10062]

2001-06-26 Thread Quek, Steven

Hi,

May I know where to download the Token Ring whitepaper?
At the same time the practice the exercise.

Thank you in advance.

regards
Steven Quek

-Original Message-
From: Ryan Ngai Hon Kong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 11:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Past my written on 3rd attempt. [7:10062]


Relief again,

Good luck to the rest of the candidate for written.
Though my mark is low (72%), kind of happy with it.

Material used:
- TCP/IP Routing (get use to OSPF,RIP,EIGRP,IGRP,BGP)
- Boson
- Token Ring whitepaper (please do the exercise!)
- Cisco Website (search engine was extremely useful)
- ACRC  ICRC (config register especially)


Best wishes,
Ryan




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=10071t=10062
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Past my written on 3rd attempt. [7:10062]

2001-06-26 Thread Quek, Steven

Hi Ryan,

Thanks and good luck for your lab.
Are you going to take that in Singapore?

regards
Steven Quek

-Original Message-
From: Ryan Ngai Hon Kong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 1:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Past my written on 3rd attempt. [7:10062]


Steven,

You could get the token ring whitepaper at 
http://www.ccprep.com/resources/news/archives/Token_Ring2.pdf
The practice exercise (with answer) is in it also.

Good luck.
Ryan

-Original Message-
From: Quek, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 12:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Past my written on 3rd attempt. [7:10062]


Hi,

May I know where to download the Token Ring whitepaper?
At the same time the practice the exercise.

Thank you in advance.

regards
Steven Quek

-Original Message-
From: Ryan Ngai Hon Kong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 11:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Past my written on 3rd attempt. [7:10062]


Relief again,

Good luck to the rest of the candidate for written.
Though my mark is low (72%), kind of happy with it.

Material used:
- TCP/IP Routing (get use to OSPF,RIP,EIGRP,IGRP,BGP)
- Boson
- Token Ring whitepaper (please do the exercise!)
- Cisco Website (search engine was extremely useful)
- ACRC  ICRC (config register especially)


Best wishes,
Ryan




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=10076t=10062
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Free CBT Player [7:2857]

2001-05-02 Thread Quek, Steven

Hi

Just like to know, does anyone has any idea where I can download free CBT
Player??

Thanks  have a nice day.

With regards
Steven Quek
Compaq Computer Asia Pte Ltd
Professional Service
Main: 65-786 2288
DID: 65-580 5176
Mobile: 65-9797 4526




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=2857t=2857
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Alcatel OmniPCX [7:2695]

2001-05-01 Thread Quek, Steven

Hi Albert,

OmniPCX is not a product of NewBridge.

It was there even before the acqusition. The OmniPCX is a IP Telephont PBX
with the capability to connect to the LAN Data.

The OmniPCX technology is proprietary  proprietary Alcatel phone set has to
be used
to communicate with the PBX. For more detail you need to check with the
Alcatel
SE.

regards

-Original Message-
From: Albert Lu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 12:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Alcatel OmniPCX [7:2695]


Hello Group,

Does anyone have knowledge/experience with Alcatel's OmniPCX boxes? I would
like to know what they are.

Was this product from the acquisition of Newbridge Networks?

Thanks

Albert
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=2765t=2695
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [Beware of VINCENT CHONG [7:1631]

2001-04-23 Thread Quek, Steven

RAM,

I am a Chinese  proud to be one.

I hope you are not racist. Please restraint yourself from making such
irresponsible  immature remarks.
One question, does your own race have this kind of people or worse?
So please in future when you point at other mistake please look at yours
first.

Please target your fustration at Vincent Chong  not entire world of
Chinese.

regards


-Original Message-
From: Manishkumar Patel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 5:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Beware of VINCENT CHONG [7:1631]


Pyare (dear) RamJi( RamG),
Please, never blame the whole Community/Country for the fault of one person,
I
have couple of CHINESE friends, they are very nice  they never do this kind
of Cheating.

IN SHORT 
NEVER BLAME THE WHOLE WORLD IF YOU HAPPENED TO DEAL WITH ONLY CHEATERS
that you can call circumstances nothing else.

I hope you might have Apologise THE CHINESE, if not so, please do it.
Thanks  regards
Manishkumar (MK)

RamG  wrote:
 Hello Gang
 
 Just want to keep you all informed on the board not to deal in any form of
 TRADE {CCIE Material }or BUYING accessories from VINCENT CHONG.  I had a
bad
 experience today.  We had entered into an agreement to trade CCIE
materials.
 I sent him soft copy of my materials and requested him to make hard copy
of
 his material.  The price for hard copy of his material was mutually agreed
 at USD.22.  I sincerely sent him the money through pay pal. To my surprise
 he has declined accepting the money and is not interested to send the
 material.  Like a KID he sent me this reply  Quote I will send back your
 material and I do not want to trade anymore. I will removed from my hard
 disk. Is this the way CHINESE behave.  Surprised.
 
 This is not a complaint.  Beware of this GUY - VINCENT CHONG.
 
 
 Thanks  /  RamG
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=1672t=1631
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]