RE: Console Kit for 1924 [7:44619]
This link may help you if you want to get one made http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/28201900/1928v5x/icg5x/c sspec.htm (watch word-wrap) Rah -Original Message- From: Justin Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 May 2002 15:52 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Console Kit for 1924 [7:44619] I have an older Cisco Cat 1924 switch with a db9 console port on it. Does anyone know where I can buy barter or steal a set of cables to get me into the thing, I have tried every combination of cable I currently have but they are apparently all the wrong pin-outs. Thanks, Justin Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=44624t=44619 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: L3 Between VLANS- no RSM or MSFC [7:44462]
The answer is router on a stick, make a trunk from the router to the switch and setup the vlans on the router as subinterfaces. Rah -Original Message- From: Phil Lorenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 May 2002 00:45 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: L3 Between VLANS- no RSM or MSFC [7:44462] I'm looking to mock up RSM/ MSFC type routing between VLANs. If my memory serves me correctly, can't I do this with a 4500 (or better) router outfitted with an FE module ??? Can anyone elaborate and/ or offer a few clues to get me researching in the right area ??? Thanks !!! Phil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=44475t=44462 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Reset the password on a 3015 [7:44049]
Did you try the default admin/admim Rah -Original Message- From: Johnson, Richard (NY Int) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 May 2002 17:28 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Reset the password on a 3015 [7:44049] Hi all, Can anyone help me reset my password on a VPN 3015. Set this up back in October and have no idea what the password is. Rich Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=44056t=44049 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Reset the password on a 3015 [7:44049]
Sorry missed the link on my last post http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/474/pswdrec_vpn3000.html Rah -Original Message- From: Johnson, Richard (NY Int) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 May 2002 17:28 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Reset the password on a 3015 [7:44049] Hi all, Can anyone help me reset my password on a VPN 3015. Set this up back in October and have no idea what the password is. Rich Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=44057t=44049 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE- I WILL BE [7:43969]
Doh ;-) Rah -Original Message- From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 May 2002 19:58 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE- I WILL BE [7:43969] Yes or when there is a problem and you ask, did you change ANYTHING you get the answer, no. a long time later after you finally isloate the problem the customer says, oh I didn't THINK that would have any effect on... You want to say I didn't ask what changes you thought would cause the problem... Dave Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: And add to that cranky users who are entirely dependent on the network but won't tell you the whole story when reporting problems. ;-) Priscilla At 09:52 PM 5/12/02, Michael L. Williams wrote: Larry Letterman wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... A 40 router lab is nice, but its not the same as troubleshooting a production network with 20,000 + users at multiple sites. Here here and to add to that. ... a production network with 20,000+ users at multiple sites... running a variety of multiprotocol, quirky, sometimes custom-written (read: homemade) applications that are trying to do whatever on the network coupled with devices from whatever manufacturers that don't play nice (oh, you need this device in it's own VLAN because broadcast traffic makes it crash), etc, etc Mike W. Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=44095t=43969 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: require module info on 3600 series router [7:43925]
Amir, I would start here http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/107/hw-e1.shtml since you have as5300 they are probably balanced/120 ohms and terminate with rj45. Don't forget the cable as the all E1 nm modules terminate with 15pin D. Best regards, Rah -Original Message- From: Amir Aziz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 May 2002 06:21 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: require module info on 3600 series router [7:43925] Hi everybody, I am here in Pakistan and we have E1 running at our ISP setup. OUR Telco provide E1 facility on G703/704I want to terminate these E1 lines directly into my router currently I am using CISCO 5300 for that purpose but I need compatiable module for my 3600 series routers as well can anyone tell me the module details or module number to use in my router I will be very thankful to the person/s. Regards, Amir Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=43930t=43925 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: syslog [7:43939]
Steven, I think it must be due to the fact that a buffer is just memory but other output locations would require additional I/O calls. Rah -Original Message- From: Steven A. Ridder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 May 2002 16:18 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: syslog [7:43939] If I debug something on a router, the messages must be generated no matter what, so why is it less taxing on a router to send them to an internal buffer instead of a console port? -- RFC 1149 Compliant. Get in my head: http://sar.dynu.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=43943t=43939 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: VoIP Netmeeting [7:43949]
Don't you need FXS to plug phones into? Rah -Original Message- From: Edmund Woltynski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 May 2002 18:19 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: VoIP Netmeeting [7:43949] Hi all Firstly I have checked the archives found nothing to help me solve this problem which I thought I had setup a working scenario in my lab 2 years ago (getting rusty have'nt played with this stuff for a while). Scenario as per sketch below G===D G===D /o\/o\ --- Phone No=11--- Phone No=22 \/ FXO \ / FXO -- 192.168.10.0 -- ( A )---( B ) -- -- / 192.168.168.80 \192.168.20.1 / \ __ | | NetMeeting | | NetMeeting |___| 12 |___| 23 / // / 192.168.168.81 192.168.20.2 IOS = c2600-js-mz.122-7b.bin The problem I have is that I cannot get netmeeting 12 (192.168.168.81) with gateway (in NM 12) set to router A to ring converse with phone 22 (FXO) on router B but can with phone 11 (naturally) and vica versa ie netmeeting 23 (192.168.20.1) cannot ring and setup a call with phone 11 but can with phone 22. Both phones (11 22) are able to initiate calls and converse with either NMs 12 or 23 and phone to phone works. (BTW using the latest version of netmeeting and have installed other IOS (plus or better to eliminate possible buggy IOS)and NM12 to NM23 ok. Would anyone care to take a quick look and see what I have missed? - much appreciated. --- A#sho run Building configuration... Current configuration : 1605 bytes ! version 12.2 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime service password-encryption ! hostname A ! enable password 7 xx ! memory-size iomem 10 ip subnet-zero no ip domain-lookup ! call rsvp-sync interface Ethernet0/0 ip address 192.168.168.80 255.255.255.0 half-duplex ! interface Serial0/0 description connected to B bandwidth 1536 ip address 192.168.10.1 255.255.255.252 encapsulation ppp ip tcp header-compression iphc-format no fair-queue clockrate 400 ip rtp header-compression iphc-format ip rtp reserve 16384 100 24 ! router rip version 2 network 192.168.10.0 network 192.168.168.0 no auto-summary ! ip classless no ip http server ip pim bidir-enable snmp-server community public RO ! voice-port 1/0/0 cptone AU description connected to Phone (11) ! dial-peer cor custom ! dial-peer voice 1 pots destination-pattern 11 port 1/0/0 ! dial-peer voice 5 voip destination-pattern 22 session target ipv4:192.168.20.1 ip precedence 5 ! dial-peer voice 81 voip destination-pattern 12 session target ipv4:192.168.168.81 codec g711ulaw ! dial-peer voice 82 voip destination-pattern 23 session target ipv4:192.168.20.2 codec g711ulaw ! line con 0 exec-timeout 0 0 password 7 x login line aux 0 line vty 0 4 password 7 xx login ! end A# B#sho run Building configuration... Current configuration : 1642 bytes ! version 12.2 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime service password-encryption ! hostname B ! enable password 7 x ! memory-size iomem 10 ip subnet-zero no ip domain-lookup ! call rsvp-sync ! interface Ethernet0/0 ip address 192.168.20.1 255.255.255.0 half-duplex ! interface Serial0/1 description connected to A bandwidth 1536 ip address 192.168.10.2 255.255.255.252 encapsulation ppp ip tcp header-compression iphc-format fair-queue 64 256 1 ip rtp header-compression iphc-format ip rtp reserve 16384 100 24 ! router rip version 2 network 192.168.10.0 network 192.168.20.0 no auto-summary ! ip classless no ip http server ip pim bidir-enable ! ! snmp-server community public RO ! voice-port 1/0/0 cptone AU description connected to Phone_1 (22) ! dial-peer cor custom ! dial-peer voice 1 pots destination-pattern 22 port 1/0/0 ! dial-peer voice 5 voip destination-pattern 11 session target ipv4:192.168.168.80 ip precedence 5 ! dial-peer voice 81 voip destination-pattern 12 session target ipv4:192.168.168.81 codec g711ulaw ! dial-peer voice 82 voip destination-pattern 23 session target ipv4:192.168.20.2 codec g711ulaw ! ! line con 0 exec-timeout 0 0 password 7 x login line aux 0 line vty 0 4 password 7 xx login ! end B# -- -- Regards Edmund Woltynski ___ The information transmitted by the following e-mail is intended only for the addressee and may contain confidential and/or privileged
RE: PIX 501 Ver 6.1 [7:43896]
I second that emotion. Sounds like a song?? Rah -Original Message- From: CiscoB [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 May 2002 19:27 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: PIX 501 Ver 6.1 [7:43896] 515 and greater. I thought the 506 only supports 2 interfaces as well. thanks, -Brad Ellis CCIE#5796 (RS / Security) Network Learning Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.optsys.net (Cisco hardware) Jablonski, Michael wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... So basically you have to look into the 506 and greater... for multiple configurable interfaces? Is there going to be an upgrade to do seperate configurations on each interface? Thanx for the quick response Mike Jablonski 312-884-2996 -Original Message- From: CiscoB To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 05/10/2002 7:40 PM Subject: Re: PIX 501 Ver 6.1 [7:43896] Those ports are switched ports of the inside interface. Envision those four ports as being a single port representing the inside interface. So you only have (2) interfaces avaiable (the inside and the outside). thanks, -Brad Ellis CCIE#5796 (RS / Security) Network Learning Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.optsys.net (Cisco hardware) Jablonski, Michael wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I'm trying to configure ethernet 2-4 on a PIX 501 (3DES), but it comes back saying only 2 interfaces are active. When I do a show version it say maximum interfaces: 2 Am I missing something or what? Please lemme know!!! Thanx, mkj ~~~ Michael Jablonski ABN AMRO Asset Management Holdings, Inc. 161 North Clark St. 9th Flr Chicago, IL 60601-2468 PH: 312.884.2996 FAX: 312.278.5550 ~~~ This message (including any attachments) is confidential and may be privileged. If you have received it by mistake please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete this message from your system. Any unauthorized use or dissemination of this message in whole or in part is strictly prohibited. Please note that e-mails are susceptible to change. ABN AMRO Bank N.V. (including its group companies) shall not be responsible nor liable for the proper and complete transmission of the information contained in this communication nor for any delay in its receipt or damage to your system. ABN AMRO Bank N.V. (or its group companies) does not guarantee that the integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that this communication is free of viruses, interceptions or interference. This message (including any attachments) is confidential and may be privileged. If you have received it by mistake please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete this message from your system. Any unauthorized use or dissemination of this message in whole or in part is strictly prohibited. Please note that e-mails are susceptible to change. ABN AMRO Bank N.V. (including its group companies) shall not be responsible nor liable for the proper and complete transmission of the information contained in this communication nor for any delay in its receipt or damage to your system. ABN AMRO Bank N.V. (or its group companies) does not guarantee that the integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that this communication is free of viruses, interceptions or interference. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=43958t=43896 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: dual-homed hosts problems [7:43677]
Priscilla, That's not very lady like ;-) Just kidding too :-) Rah -Original Message- From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 May 2002 17:58 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: dual-homed hosts problems [7:43677] At 12:35 PM 5/10/02, Maximus wrote: Sorry list members, the spell-checker changed OSPF to SOP. I think OSPF should be SOB. Just kidding! :-) Priscilla - Original Message - From: Maximus To: Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 12:40 PM Subject: Re: dual-homed hosts problems [7:43677] I may be wrong but your friend is using a routing protocol and therefore the below would not apply to the scenario. As for running SOP on the server IMHO it would be overkill for this specific situation. Keep it simple. Would I run SOP on a server? Depends on why I had the server built in the first place. Have a nice day! - Original Message - From: Jeffrey Reed To: Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 8:27 AM Subject: RE: dual-homed hosts problems [7:43677] I just talked to someone yesterday who said they are running OSPF on the WIN2000 servers and using dual NICs effectively. Is this a better way to dual home servers? Jeffrey Reed Classic Networking, Inc. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Galo Villacis Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 7:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: dual-homed hosts problems [7:43677] I believe your issue may relate to the single IP stack on 2000. Try defaulting traffic to the internet and adding a static route to the internal network opposed to specifying the gateway on the internal IP interface. Also I would go as far as disabling any NETBIOS on the external interface for security. cmd would be: route add -p Network Mask Gateway - Original Message - From: Henrique Duarte To: Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 5:48 PM Subject: Re: dual-homed hosts problems [7:43677] Bulent, Thank you for the reply. I am afraid you may have misunderstood this problem. Allow me to be more clear: 192.168.0.1 - 192.168.0.150 - Host A - 128.59.39.3 | (dual homed server) | | | | | 128.59.39.2 router A router C Internet | 192.168.1.1 | | T1 | | 192.168.1.2 | router B | 192.168.2.1 The problem happens on Host A. Host A is a WebServer with 2 interfaces: a public (which goes out to the internet) and a private (which talks to the database). The private interface has IP 192.168.0.150 and default GW 192.168.0.1. The public has ip 128.59.39.3 and default GW 128.59.39.2. Everything works fine if I leave the private interface's default GW blank. If I put Router C's address as the private interface's default gateway, after some time I cannot ping anywhere from Host A, even though I can ping it from the outside world. I need to have the private interface configured with 192.168.0.1 as the default GW because remote users need to be able to connect to that server via the back-end T1. Any light would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, -H - Original Message - From: B|lent ^ahin To: Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 3:17 AM Subject: RE: dual-homed hosts problems [7:43677] When configuring ethernet interfaces on MS environment, you have three blank spaces to fill: IP_address, Subnet_mask and Default_gateway. So the people start to think every ethernet interface as a router: This interface will route IP packets to the other interface, so the default gateway of the first interface should be same as the IP address of the second interface., but there is one router on the PC: CPU. Try to configure only one default gateway. You can use the command route print to see what happens when you configure two or more default gateways. Bulent -Original Message- From: Henrique Duarte [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: dual-homed hosts problems [7:43677] Hello All, I am working on some dual homed servers at a co-location where there is a public and private interface on each. The public interfaces attach to the internet via a router while the private ones are on its own separate private subnet. The private subnet is attached to another router, which provides remote users access to the private network via a T1 line. I am encountering the following issue. When I set the private
RE: dual-homed hosts problems [7:43677]
Oh I see hehehe Rah -Original Message- From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 May 2002 19:43 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: dual-homed hosts problems [7:43677] Sob as in cry! OSPF makes me cry. ;-) At 07:15 PM 5/10/02, Rah Hussain wrote: Priscilla, That's not very lady like ;-) Just kidding too :-) Rah -Original Message- From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 May 2002 17:58 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: dual-homed hosts problems [7:43677] At 12:35 PM 5/10/02, Maximus wrote: Sorry list members, the spell-checker changed OSPF to SOP. I think OSPF should be SOB. Just kidding! :-) Priscilla - Original Message - From: Maximus To: Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 12:40 PM Subject: Re: dual-homed hosts problems [7:43677] I may be wrong but your friend is using a routing protocol and therefore the below would not apply to the scenario. As for running SOP on the server IMHO it would be overkill for this specific situation. Keep it simple. Would I run SOP on a server? Depends on why I had the server built in the first place. Have a nice day! - Original Message - From: Jeffrey Reed To: Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 8:27 AM Subject: RE: dual-homed hosts problems [7:43677] I just talked to someone yesterday who said they are running OSPF on the WIN2000 servers and using dual NICs effectively. Is this a better way to dual home servers? Jeffrey Reed Classic Networking, Inc. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Galo Villacis Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 7:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: dual-homed hosts problems [7:43677] I believe your issue may relate to the single IP stack on 2000. Try defaulting traffic to the internet and adding a static route to the internal network opposed to specifying the gateway on the internal IP interface. Also I would go as far as disabling any NETBIOS on the external interface for security. cmd would be: route add -p Network Mask Gateway - Original Message - From: Henrique Duarte To: Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 5:48 PM Subject: Re: dual-homed hosts problems [7:43677] Bulent, Thank you for the reply. I am afraid you may have misunderstood this problem. Allow me to be more clear: 192.168.0.1 - 192.168.0.150 - Host A - 128.59.39.3 | (dual homed server) | | | | | 128.59.39.2 router A router C Internet | 192.168.1.1 | | T1 | | 192.168.1.2 | router B | 192.168.2.1 The problem happens on Host A. Host A is a WebServer with 2 interfaces: a public (which goes out to the internet) and a private (which talks to the database). The private interface has IP 192.168.0.150 and default GW 192.168.0.1. The public has ip 128.59.39.3 and default GW 128.59.39.2. Everything works fine if I leave the private interface's default GW blank. If I put Router C's address as the private interface's default gateway, after some time I cannot ping anywhere from Host A, even though I can ping it from the outside world. I need to have the private interface configured with 192.168.0.1 as the default GW because remote users need to be able to connect to that server via the back-end T1. Any light would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, -H - Original Message - From: B|lent ^ahin To: Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 3:17 AM Subject: RE: dual-homed hosts problems [7:43677] When configuring ethernet interfaces on MS environment, you have three blank spaces to fill: IP_address, Subnet_mask and Default_gateway. So the people start to think every ethernet interface as a router: This interface will route IP packets to the other interface, so the default gateway of the first interface should be same as the IP address of the second interface., but there is one router on the PC: CPU. Try to configure only one default gateway. You can use the command route print to see what happens when you configure two or more default gateways. Bulent -Original Message- From: Henrique Duarte [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: dual-homed hosts problems [7:43677] Hello All, I am working on some dual homed servers at a co-location where
RE: congestion down main pipeline [7:42681]
What about STS shower traffic shaping, when the water builds up you reduce the water using the tap. ( meant in good humour ) -Original Message- From: Yahoudi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 April 2002 00:48 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: congestion down main pipeline [7:42681] sam sneed wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... The main problem I've been having deals with congestion and transfer rates. When taking a shower longer than 5 minutes the pipeline by the drain gets flooded with traffic and the water gets queued up.The rate at which water enters the tub and leaves through the pipeline is disproportionate and I'm not happy with the results. I tried draino, no dice. I tried CCO and couldn't find the answer there. Any CCIE's have any tips for a newbie? Advice? Yes. Become a CCIE and answer your own question ;) ( meant in good humor ) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42736t=42681 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE: How long is the waiting list [7:39357]
Daniel, Depend on location, san jose has seats tomorrow if you wanted 25-Mar-2002 ( 4 seats available) 26-Mar-2002 ( 1 seats available) 01-Apr-2002 ( 3 seats available) 02-Apr-2002 ( 2 seats available) 03-Apr-2002 ( 3 seats available) Best regards, Rah -Original Message- From: Daniel Thiffeault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 24 March 2002 14:32 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE: How long is the waiting list [7:39357] I would simply like to know if it is possible to schedule the lab- lets say 3 to 4 weeks after the written- How long is the waiting list. Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=39360t=39357 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Bandwidth limit at the E I [7:37105]
You can limit traffic with car and it works on most platforms http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12cgcr/qos_c /qcpart4/qcpolts.htm Regards, Rah -Original Message- From: Mohannad Khuffash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 March 2002 19:13 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Bandwidth limit at the E I [7:37105] Hello, Is there any spesific command i can use to limit the bandwidth available at the ethernet interfaces ? Please advise ? Regards, -- Mohannad N. Khuffash Network Administrator Palestine Telecommunication Company Tel: 00972-02-2982330 Fax:00972-02-2980235 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37107t=37105 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PPPoE [7:36910]
I don't think the 677 even runs IOS. Regards, Rah -Original Message- From: Frankie Chiang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 March 2002 09:11 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: PPPoE [7:36910] Dear Mark, Can this apply to Cisco 677 ? Best Regard, Frankie Mark Odette II Jim, the following should work for you on a 1750 with the WIC1-ENET card (required for PPPoE Support as of 12.1.x): version 12.1 ! vpdn enable no vpdn logging ! vpdn-group sbc request-dialin protocol pppoe ! interface Ethernet0 no ip address no ip mroute-cache full-duplex pppoe enable pppoe-client dial-pool-number 1 no cdp enable ! interface FastEthernet0 ip address 10.10.1.1 255.255.255.0 ip nat inside no ip route-cache no ip mroute-cache speed auto full-duplex ! interface Dialer0 bandwidth 1 ip address negotiated ip mtu 1492 ip nat outside encapsulation ppp dialer pool 1 dialer-group 1 no cdp enable ppp authentication pap callin ppp pap sent-username username password password ! router rip version 2 passive-interface Ethernet0 network 10.10.1.0 ! ip nat translation timeout 50 ip nat translation finrst-timeout 30 ip nat translation syn-timeout 5 ip nat translation port-timeout tcp 80 90 ip nat translation max-entries 500 ip nat inside source list 101 interface Dialer0 overload ip classless ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer0 no ip http server ! access-list 101 permit ip 10.10.1.0 0.0.0.255 any dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit - Good Luck! Mark -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jim Bond Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 7:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: PPPoE [7:36910] Hello, I found a sample config for PPPoE on CCO, it's 1700 talking to 6400. I have a PPPoE client using 1750 but I don't know if ISP uses 6400. Will 1750 work with other PPPoE servers? Thanks. Jim __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Greetings - Send FREE e-cards for every occasion! http://greetings.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=36951t=36910 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Re: Sample Rate [7:36566]
Priscilla, Wow what a great idea. I have been looking into programs that 'read' text on the computer, but they all sound like r2d2, so this is just what I need for drive to and from home. I hope you do more like it. Thanks Rah -Original Message- From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 March 2002 20:15 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Re: Sample Rate [7:36566] Speaking of sample rates, I am playing with the idea of offering audio training using MP3 files. I have prepared such a training on WAN Troubleshooting. I'd love to get some feedback. This audio training will help people studying for the Support test especially. It's 40 minutes. This means the file is huge, so don't try this at home on a modem line. The file is available for download here: http://www.troubleshootingnetworks.com/audio.html Please send me some feedback. Would you find such a product line helpful? Would you pay for MP3 audio training files? Thanks. Priscilla Oppenheimer At 03:32 PM 2/27/02, John Neiberger wrote: Yes, this was very distracting! :-) I didn't get any studying done at all last night! Between checking and answering email, looking for Clannad MP3s, reading about the Gaelic language just for fun, and looking up telecom stuff it's a wonder I even powered up a router. I was able to boot up six routers, erase their configs, and recable them in preparation for a lab scenario tonight. Not bad for three hours work. heh heh... Thanks, John Priscilla Oppenheimer 2/27/02 3:04:13 PM Female opera singers probably hate it when people ask them to sing over the phone!? OK, have we distracted you enough, John? ;-) Seriously, I think this was a great discussion. Thanks to everyone who contributed. Priscilla At 10:58 AM 2/27/02, David L. Blair wrote: John Neiberger wrote: What I'm trying to find out is why the original 4KHz limit on voice calls was put into place. It sounds like it was simply an arbitrary decision. 4KHz is sufficient for a telephone call and to provide clear calls that included higher frequencies might have added some technical complexities, perhaps. They also added a high-pass filter around 400Hz since most telephones can't reproduce low frequencies well and it also filters out some harmonics of 50-60Hz hum that might show up from time to time. That is concrete reason for including a high-pass filter and I wondered if there was a concrete technical reason for including the 4KHz low-pass filter. From the sounds of it there really isn't a technical issue, 4K is just a nice round number. :-) I used three sources to answer John's query: Voice over IP Fundamentals, Cisco Voice over Frame Relay, ATM, and IP, and Integrating Voice and Data Networks. These are great books for anyone wanting to know more about voice technologies. Interesting Facts and Ideas I came across: 1) Human hearing is in the range of 200 Hz to 20,000 Hz 2) Human speech is in the range of 250 Hz to 10,000 Hz. Most of the information comes from the middle frequencies. According to Nyquist, Human voice contains sounds that are more often Middle-pitched frequencies than either High or Low pitched frequencies. 3) Frequencies greater than 4,000 Hz are filter out to limit crosstalk. 4) During the Analog to Digital conversion voice samples are put though a process called Quantization. Quantization is the process of rounding sampled values to the nearest predefined discreet value. Pulse Code Modulation (PCM) is a Quantization process. PCM is also used to achieve 12 to 13 bits of voice information in 8 bit words. Two commonly used PCM's are: mu-law (North America), and a-law (Europe). What you hear is not someone's voice, but a representation of their voice. 5) Noise is a major issue when talking about voice quality. Noise is constant problem for Analog signals. What is signal and what is Noise? When a Analog signal is amplified so is the Noise, which in turn makes the quality of Analog calls worst as the distance increases. Digital Calls are less suitable to Noise than Analog calls. 6) Delay is a major issue when talking about conversation flow for two reasons: 1) For a conversation to flow normally, the delay is receiving the voice information must be less than 250ms. When the delay is more than 250ms, the human receiving the voice message will start to talk thinking the human sending the voice message is at a breaking point in the conversation, i.e.. both people are talking at the same time similar to a collision in Ethernet. Delay is also important in how the voice packets are filled during the Analog to Digital conversion. That is why ATM (ATM cell is 53 octets, 5 octets are header and 48 octets are payload) is a good method for transporting voice packets because the delay to fill the payload section is smaller than with other cell/packet types. Answer: It does indeed seem that
RE: Router Stops working after awhile [7:36847]
Hi, I have seen this happen with router with environment sensors (because they are too hot) or with some with faults in the ios code. Rah -Original Message- From: Zahid Hassan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 28 February 2002 20:56 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Router Stops working after awhile [7:36847] Hi All, I would appreciate if anybody could shed some light into this problem. I have a router which just powers off after a while running. Sometimes it is not possible to power it on again. Is it something to do with the power supply or any other hardware in the router ? Regards, Zahid Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=36879t=36847 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: copying flash to a tftp server [7:36866]
Yes you can copy both ways on most router, but need more INPUT to help. Rah -Original Message- From: Jeff Dutton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 28 February 2002 21:56 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: copying flash to a tftp server [7:36866] Once again please forgive my ignorance but I seem to have a problem copying flash to a tftp server via a console connection but have been able to do it in the past with an existing connection via a telnet session. Is this not possible? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=36883t=36866 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Booting from slot0: [7:36841]
Have you set the config register to 0x2102? Rah -Original Message- From: Douglas McConnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 28 February 2002 22:14 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Booting from slot0: [7:36841] Woody, Didn't work... Is this related to the config-register and/or config_field= ... ? --- Woods, Randall, SOBUS wrote: try boot system flash slot0:image-name.bin Woody CCNP -Original Message- From: Douglas McConnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 3:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Booting from slot0: [7:36841] I am having troubles getting a 7000 Series router to boot from slot0: only. I tried the command boot flash slot0:, but it is still not working... I know the answer is right in front of my face... Ideas? :-) = Douglas McConnell - Senior Network Engineer Cisco Certified Network Professional __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Greetings - Send FREE e-cards for every occasion! http://greetings.yahoo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] = Douglas McConnell - Senior Network Engineer Cisco Certified Network Professional __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Greetings - Send FREE e-cards for every occasion! http://greetings.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=36885t=36841 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Standard WAN serial cable in Europe [7:35499]
The standard wan cable in the uk is X.21 Rah -Original Message- From: Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 February 2002 15:10 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Standard WAN serial cable in Europe [7:35499] Hi All - Any know what's the standard serial cable they use for CSU/DSU in Europe? I know in U.S. they use V35. Thanks! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35501t=35499 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Xmodem [7:26689]
give the msfc a ip add and do a tftp copy. rah -Original Message- From: Venkataramanaiah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 November 2001 14:48 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Xmodem [7:26689] Hi all, I am trying to download a boot image onto MSFC bootflash (Cat6K). I am connected to the switch console through a terminal server. The normal XModem download procedure doesnt seem to work. Do we need to make any changes to the terminal server to make this work. /Venkat Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=26732t=26689 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: where exactly is the equipment replicated ? [7:26243]
42 is the answer to the life, universe and everything (Hitchhikers Guide BBC TV, Radio and book) but what is the question ;-) Rah Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=26374t=26243 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
