Re: SNMP Community String [7:31373]
Just access-list it. - Original Message - From: Kwame To: Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 8:03 AM Subject: SNMP Community String [7:31373] Is there a way to encrypt the snmp community strings? The strings are security holes since there are tools out there (I know of at least one) capable of deriving the RW strings, given the RO strings. Once the RW strings are known, you can download the config files and hack the passwords although I'm yet to see enable secret passwords cracked (I could be wrong). Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31376t=31373 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: sh IP route and IP question [7:27997]
The good ole PPP host route generated by PPP. If you use HDLC encap it will not happpen but they you have to for go all the nice things PPP encap gies ya. You can also disable the host route genration on the BRI interface. Raul - Original Message - From: Bob Perez To: Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 12:59 PM Subject: sh IP route and IP question [7:27997] I have a ISDN failover connection and whenever the connection kicks in and I do a show IP route I get the following information and it is not correct. Atlanta RTR(I did sh ip ro)- C 128.121.22.146/32 BRI0/0 When in actuality, the BRI int on the other router is 128.121.22.146/28 I disconnect the ISDN and the route disappears which is what should happen Does anyopne know what would cause the one router to detect the wrong net address from the other routers BRI? This is stopping me from being able to hit the other router when the S0/0 goes down. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=28002t=27997 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Off Topic - Router price [7:24537]
I also have 2523 and have found it awsome as frame switch. *00 is an excellent priceI got mine for a little over 900 with 16/16 Raul - Original Message - From: Ouellette, Tim To: Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 9:03 AM Subject: RE: Off Topic - Router price [7:24537] Charles, I have a 2523 and just adore it. From what I've found in my home studies is that even a low speed serial is good enough for testing. It's all about routable ports and my 2523 has 8 low speed serials, 2 high-speed serials, a TR port and I think an ISDN too. I paid $800 for my 2523 with 16/16 which at the time was a decent price. I prefer to use that as my frame switch rather than my 4000. It's not like you'll be passing tons of traffic over these links since it would just be in a lab environment so the low-speed serials are good enough. Hope that helped. Tim -Original Message- From: Charles Lin [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 12:14 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Off Topic - Router price [7:24537] Thank You Brad! So you suggest that I not take the 4000M right? Even if it cost 400 with all those plugins? I thought it was good though, hehe. Does the lab have a 4000 in it then? (hope it won't violate the NDA). You also said that the 2522 was good for frame switch right? How about a 2520 or a 2521 because it has 4 serials too! Could you help me please? Thanks! From: Brad Ellis Reply-To: Brad Ellis To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Off Topic - Router price [7:24537] Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 16:02:01 -0500 I'd recommend using the following routers instead for a CCIE lab: 2x 2501s 2x 2503s (for ISDN) 1x 2511 (reverse telnet AS) 2x 2513s (TR/Ether) 1x 2522 (frame-switch) ISDN Simulator Catalyst 5k switch If you still want to add on: 26xx routers with Voice 3900 TR Switch That is usually the formula that I suggest to people trying to build home labs. The 4000s are a pain in the butt to deal with and have given me nothing but problems (hence I dont sell/buy them anymore). Make sure your 25xx routers have 16D/16F so you can run enterprise 12.x IOS. thanks, -Brad Ellis CCIE#5796 Network Learning Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] used Cisco gear: www.optsys.net CCIE Labs, racks, and classes: www.ccbootcamp.com Charles Lin wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hello! Someone is going to sell me his routers and wanted to ask if they are a good deal. Please help me and advice me if they are good price. 1.) Cisco 4000M Router with 16/16, 2 Serials Ports, 2 Tokens Rings Ports, and 4 ISDN ports for $400USD. 2.) Cisco 2524 Router with 8/4 flash, 1 module of isdn and 1 module of 56k included for 350$ 3.) Cisco 2516 Router for $449 USD 4.) Cisco 1602 for 200 USD 5.) Cisco 2515 for 425 USD Please tell me which ones are good priced. I am really grateful for your help. _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=24657t=24537 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Jeff Doyle Vol I or II? [7:24269]
Halabi is to BGP what Doyle I is to IGPs a must have. - Original Message - From: juno vtv To: Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 3:17 PM Subject: Re: Jeff Doyle Vol I or II? [7:24269] Thank you guys for the info! I would like to get a book for IGPs and then one for BGP. So would you guys recommend VOL 1 and Halabi's IRA? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=24282t=24269 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Jeff Doyle Vol I or II? [7:24269]
The first one is a must. - Original Message - From: juno vtv To: Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:25 PM Subject: Jeff Doyle Vol I or II? [7:24269] Hi everybody, Does anybody know what the difference are between Jeff Doyle's Routing TCP/IP Vol 1 and 2, besides BGP stuff?I have heard some conflicting arguments about these books. Which volume would you guys recommend? Thanks! -junovtv Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=24281t=24269 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: www.anthonypanda.com [7:22223]
I agree with that. I have on 2 occassions done business with KG2 and the prices were by far the best. BTW, excellent customer sevice. Sincerely, Raul F. Fernandez - Original Message - From: Kelly D Griffin To: Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 11:30 AM Subject: www.anthonypanda.com [7:3] I know that sales promotions are not allowed on this forum, but I need to defend a false statement that was made earlier this week about our pricing versus www.anthonypanda.com. We have the same prices or better on all of our products versus this foreign seller and you will have your product within 3 days of ordering (usually 2 days). I may get flamed, or kicked off of the list by Paul, but I need to clear up the false accusations spread by some members of this list. Thank you for your understanding. Kelly D Griffin, CCDA, CCNA Network Engineer Kg2 Network Design http://kg2.com 877.418.4025 Toll-Free 501.464.8998 Fax http://kg2.com 8Mb Flash for Cisco 2500 series routers for $47 16Mb DRAM for Cisco 2500 series routers for $30 Back-to-Back cables starting at $24 Octal cables for Cisco 2509 and 2511 for $28 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=22234t=3 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Passed the CCIE Written! 850 [7:19304]
Tom, Congrats. You have will have about a 6 month wait in the 2 day format. This actually will be better when the 1 day format crancks up at the beginning of October. Again congrats. - Original Message - From: Tom Keough To: Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 3:59 PM Subject: Passed the CCIE Written! 850 [7:19304] Thanks to all who responded to my question regarding time pressure and the written... I passed with a score of 85%!!! What a relief. When I got home with my registration number in hand I went to the Cisco web site and tried to register for the lab. Too soon, the error message says it will take 3 to 5 days for my results to make it to the registration database...;-( I want to see if I have a choice of a one day or two day lab date, anyone know? BTW I could go back to review my answers! I marked six that I guessed at and at the end of the exam I still didn't know them, not much help for me. Thanks again, Tom Tom Keough, CCNP, MCSE [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19309t=19304 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: console port broken, how can i login in router? [7:18651]
Does it havve a configuration on it? If not then the serial interfaces can SLARP a config on to the router. EALouie is an expert on this and he is part of the mailing list. Raul - Original Message - From: xie rootstock To: Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 2:09 PM Subject: console port broken, how can i login in router? [7:18651] i used aux port and telnet for login, but both only can into mode, and i pressed ctrl+break to revise confreg, but not work, it seems the router ignore what i pressed. any segguestion? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=18657t=18651 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: For FR Grus.... [7:16635]
If dont want to use the DLCs and you are using a physical interface for frame-relay just disable frame-relay inverse arp. If you dont want to do that use point - to - point subinterfaces and define the DLCI you want to use on the subinterface. Raul - Original Message - From: Donald B Johnson jr To: Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 11:19 AM Subject: Re: For FR Grus [7:16635] How do you set up a sw as a full mesh and a network as a HUB and Spoke. I dont understand. - Original Message - From: Cisco Lover To: Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 7:08 AM Subject: Fwd: For FR Grus [7:16635] Oopss Sorry guys...I donto know where it lost in b/w..Any way..I have write it here again. Thanks for the kind replies.. For eg, our FR switch is setup for Full mesh,But out network is setup as Hub Spoke environment.In that case there must be some unused DLCI's on spoke routers which we would still be seeing as active on these routers although they would be of no use offcourse for this envioronmetnt. Is there any way If we can get rid of these DLCIS on the spokes.i.e to disable them or USE any method which block them to be appearing on spoek routers.(without touching FR switch) I know Must be confusing for majority here ..But .. I AM SURE I WILL GET THE SOLUTION HERE AS WELL. Thanks. From: Cisco Lover Reply-To: Cisco Lover To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: For FR Grus [7:16635] Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 07:06:08 -0400 Hi Guys.. Come with some New Queston.. For eg, our FR switch is setup for Full mesh,But out network is setup as Hub Spoke FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=16673t=16635 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Simulating SNA traffic in a network [7:16247]
Thank John, I will do that. Raul - Original Message - From: John Neiberger To: Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 10:17 AM Subject: Re: Simulating SNA traffic in a network [7:16247] A few months ago I posted some configs that configure your routers for APPN. This will allow you to test RSRB and DLSw configs. Is that what you're referring to? If so, look through the archives for APPN and you should find the working configs. You will need an IOS image that allows APPN to do this. HTH, John Raul F. Fernandez 8/15/01 8:53:45 PM Hi Folks, Seems a while I read an e-mail that there maybe some IOS versions which let you simulate SNA traffic. Ifnos does anyone remember or know anything about it? Thank you, Raul Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=16287t=16247 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: QUERY ON FRAME RELAY, Can't ping to it's own interface [7:13877]
I am not having any problem pinging my subinterface addresses locally. You may want to shut down the interface and bring it back up and see if this alleviates your problem. Raul - Original Message - From: Grad Alfons Kanon To: Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 9:24 AM Subject: QUERY ON FRAME RELAY, Can't ping to it's own interface [7:13862] Hello, Can anybody explain why we I can't ping to local multipoint sub interface..? int s0 encapsulation frame relay frame-relay lmi-type ansi int 0.1 multipoint ip add 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.248 frame-relay interface-dlci 200 frame-relay interface-dlci 300 i can't ping to 172.16.1.1 locally, tx Grad _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13877t=13877 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FrameRelay Over Utilized [7:13349]
Telco problem.over utilization should not make a PVC drop just casue drop packets spevailly if you are exceeding the prot speed. Raul - Original Message - From: Jeff To: Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 9:20 AM Subject: FrameRelay Over Utilized [7:13349] Hello, If I have a frame relay switch which is being over utilized will that cause the connection to drop. After looking in the log I see dlci 501 state changed to inactive, line protocol on interface s0/0.1 changed to down, dlci 501 active, this keeps going and going through out the log. The local telco insists that the circuit is overutilized and this is why the connection is dropping. I think it is a telco or csu problem. Also doing a show interface is showing 3000 crc errors and 500 interface resets for the past 3 days. Is there any way to tell for sure whether it is overutilization or a telco problem?? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13357t=13349 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ios features [7:12945]
You will need a username and paswword to access it. Raul - Original Message - From: Donald B Johnson jr To: Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2001 10:44 AM Subject: ios features [7:12945] Does anyone remember the link that allows you to search for a IOS version based on a feature, say DHCP. Don Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=12951t=12945 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New CCIE Lab!!??!!! [7:12926] - IGNORE THIS - JOKE [7:12991]
I dont think anyone should say anything about the new lab until they have experienced it. And if you are unfortunate enough to be able to compare both the go ahead. I dont think CISCO is going to in anyway harm the program. Raul - Original Message - From: Greg Macaulay To: Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2001 2:38 PM Subject: RE: New CCIE Lab!!??!!! [7:12926] - IGNORE THIS - JOKE [7:12988] Perhaps -- you may be correct -- however, it is also possible that there are other justifiable reasons for the change and that the restructuring will be as arduous and thorough as the original lab. My read on what they are saying -- is that many of the fundamental tasks (static routes etc) we should have mastered (or at least familiarized ourselves with) during the CCNA/CCNP. However, I would be that while those tasks will no longer be graded -- you would still need a mastery of those basics to be able to proceed with the tasks required of a one-day lab (Hopefully!!!). Certainly the complexities of the more advanced tasks will assume a strong understanding of the basics. But we'll see!!! Greg Macaulay Oldest CCNP/CCDP on Earth Lifetime Member of AARP Retired Attorney/Law Professor -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ciaron Gogarty Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2001 1:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: New CCIE Lab!!??!!! [7:12926] - IGNORE THIS - JOKE [7:12975] I do believe that the format IS changing to a one day lab, so it's actually taking the piss out of the reasons Cisco are giving for changing the format... Personally, I think CCIE is THE most respected vendor certification out there, so why change what (to my mind) has been a great format for seperating the weed from the chaff?? In the end, the market will get swamped with half baked CCIE's who have no substantive real world experience and the value of the cert will go down... much like the way the MCSE went.. thats my two cents -Original Message- From: Andrew Larkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 July 2001 14:52 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: New CCIE Lab!!??!!! [7:12926] - IGNORE THIS - JOKE [7:12943] thanks I read this after an all night work session - half asleep -Original Message- From: Ciaron Gogarty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 July 2001 15:23 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: New CCIE Lab!!??!!! [7:12926] I think u should read the article more closely ;-) -Original Message- From: Andrew Larkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 July 2001 10:05 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FW: New CCIE Lab!!??!!! [7:12926] This is what I received from a colleague. Is this true? http://angelfire.com/my/no1daylab/new_format.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=12991t=12991 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Current Wait time on the lab [7:12713]
First of all, unless they make the lab very easy this will not ever happen. Unlike other certifications for this one you have to study and have hands on. Most people say they want one but its hard to do due to real life time constraints. I have my own home lab and it helps but so much material at the core to get down cold. And really the way I look at is this, the routing and switching CCIE should be the start and then you either go Security or ISP CCIE. Plus I dont think any doggies will be interested in routing but a fire hydrantthat another thing! :-] Raul - Original Message - From: Burnham, Chris To: Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 10:34 AM Subject: RE: Current Wait time on the lab [7:12713] Does this mean it is going to get easier or harder (hopefully the latter) But I presume this means twice as many people can sit the lab per year. How long before every man and his dog has the CCIE ??? Dennis, what are your thoughts? rgds Chris.B. -Original Message- From: Dennis H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 July 2001 15:07 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Current Wait time on the lab [7:12713] Where did you get your information that anyone already scheduled keeps their two day date? CCIE's are telling me that people who are scheduled after Oct. will get a notice that their two day lab is changed to a single day... Greg Macaulay wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Heads Up!! Cisco just announced that they are going to a one-day lab effective October 1, 2001. Anyone who is already scheduled for the two-day lab keeps their date. All others get a one-day lab. Thus, the scheduling dates for the lab should open up! Hopefully! Greg Macaulay Oldest CCNP/CCDP on Earth Lifetime Member of AARP Retired Attorney/Law Professor -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dennis Bailey Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 7:47 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Current Wait time on the lab [7:12713] I think it's hit or miss on anything sooner than March 2002. Basically, I think you can 'luck out' if you happen to search for dates at the same time someone may be cancelling and re-scheduling or trying to swap a date. I scheduled mine last week and came up with an available date during this month. Needless to say, I took a date from next March instead :) Jaspreet Bhatia wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Guys, Does anyone know what is the current wait time for the R/S lab in San Jose . Jaspreet This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the addressee and are confidential. They may also be legally privileged. Copyright in them is reserved by Delphis Consulting PLC [Delphis] and they must not be disclosed to, or used by, anyone other than the addressee. If you have received this e-mail and any accompanying files in error, you may not copy, publish or use them in any way and you should delete them from your system and notify us immediately.E-mails are not secure. Delphis does not accept responsibility for changes to e-mails that occur after they have been sent. Any opinions expressed in this e-mail may be personal to the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of Delphis. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=12821t=12713 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Eigrp doesn't form neighborship trhough an ISDN link [7:12644]
Add the broadcast statement to your dialer map. Raul - Original Message - From: Davide Ferrari To: Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 9:21 AM Subject: Eigrp doesn't form neighborship trhough an ISDN link [7:12633] Hi all.. Strange problem two router having a ISDN (bri) and a FR connection form neighborship thru FR, but not thru ISDN. Take a look at the conf... What I'm missing? === ROUTER A === interface Loopback0 ip address 200.100.100.17 255.255.255.248 ! interface Serial0/0 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay no ip mroute-cache delay 1 no fair-queue ! interface Serial0/0.1 point-to-point ip address 212.1.22.17 255.255.255.240 delay 1 frame-relay interface-dlci 51 ! interface BRI0/0 ip address 212.1.22.66 255.255.255.240 encapsulation ppp dialer idle-timeout 100 dialer map ip 212.1.22.65 dialer-group 1 isdn switch-type basic-net3 ! router eigrp 101 network 200.100.100.0 network 212.1.22.0 no auto-summary no eigrp log-neighbor-changes ! dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit 1w5d: EIGRP: Received HELLO on Serial0/0.1 nbr 212.1.22.18 1w5d: AS 101, Flags 0x0, Seq 0/0 idbQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 peerQ un/rely 0/0 1w5d: EIGRP: Sending HELLO on BRI0/0 1w5d: AS 101, Flags 0x0, Seq 0/0 idbQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 1w5d: EIGRP: Sending HELLO on Loopback0 1w5d: AS 101, Flags 0x0, Seq 0/0 idbQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 1w5d: EIGRP: Received HELLO on Loopback0 nbr 200.100.100.17 1w5d: AS 101, Flags 0x0, Seq 0/0 idbQ 0/0 ROUTER B interface Loopback0 ip address 200.100.100.25 255.255.255.248 ! interface Serial0/0 description Seriale verso R5 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay no fair-queue ! interface Serial0/0.1 point-to-point ip address 212.1.22.1 255.255.255.240 delay 1 frame-relay interface-dlci 55 ! interface BRI0/0 ip address 212.1.22.65 255.255.255.240 encapsulation ppp dialer idle-timeout 100 dialer map ip 212.1.22.66 dialer-group 1 isdn switch-type basic-net3 ! router eigrp 101 network 200.100.100.0 network 212.1.22.0 no auto-summary no eigrp log-neighbor-changes dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=12644t=12644 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCBOOTCAMP Labs [7:12526]
The labs in my humble opinion are good. I use them. They make you think and are excellent material to help in the pursuit of the CCIE. Like everyhting else, these labs are just tools and these tools will only get you so far. A combination of reading, a lot of configuration(hands on) and troubleshooting(hands on) and a little luck are keys. If I were you though, I would worry about passing the CCIE written first. Anyway, why call him a clown? I dont know the guy personally but you should be a bit more polite. Raul - Original Message - From: Yhladi Ghfaskovich To: Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 3:06 PM Subject: CCBOOTCAMP Labs [7:12526] I am looking to start my CCIE study and have done some research on practice labs. It seems that the CCBOOTCAMP labs are the best known to this list. Why would you buy this lab kit from someone who hasn't passed the CCIE lab? I have heard that Marc Russell has failed the lab several times. Doesn't this defeat the purpose? If this clown didn't pass the labs why would you go to him for study tools?. His product is also much more expensive than the other options out there. Does anyone have any experience with some of the other products out there? Thank you, Yhladi Ghfaskovich CCNA Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=12531t=12526 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help!!! [7:9311]
Lee, Just from your show ver looks like the IOS is not seeing the serial interfaces. I suggest you upgrade your code. Raul - Original Message - From: Hunt Lee To: Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 9:56 AM Subject: Help!!! [7:9311] [ The following text is in the x-user-defined character set. ] [ Your display is set for the US-ASCII character set. ] [ Some characters may be displayed incorrectly. ] I have just bought a Cisco 2503 router from Ebay. However, after I boot up the router, I only see the following 2 interfaces: Routershow ip int brief InterfaceIP-Address OK? MethodStatus Protocol BRI0 unassigned YES not set administratively down down Ethernet0unassigned YES not set administratively down down Router But I can't find the Serial interfaces. I tried swapping out the DRAM and Flash, but the same thing happen. Please help. Another thing I noticed when the router boots up: F3: 3343908+79112+202788 at 0x360 show flash System flash directory: File Length Name/status 1 3423052 igs-g-l.110-9 [3423116 bytes used, 771188 available, 4194304 total] 4096K bytes of processor board System flash (Read ONLY) And when i do show ver, it's not even showing up?? Processor board ID 02996147, with hardware revision Bridging software. Basic Rate ISDN software, Version 1.0. 1 Ethernet/IEEE 802.3 interface. 1 ISDN Basic Rate interface. 32K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory. 4096K bytes of processor board System flash (Read ONLY) Configuration register is 0x2102 Regards, Hunt Lee Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9319t=9311 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: A post in alt.certification.cisco all should read [7:9286]
[ The following text is in the iso-8859-1 character set. ] [ Your display is set for the US-ASCII character set. ] [ Some characters may be displayed incorrectly. ] Folks, This is but one of the e-mails I have seen on the subject, I think it looks very promising myself: Hello, My name is Lorne Braddock and I manage Cisco's CCIE program. I wish to address any rumors you may have heard about a so called one-day CCIE certification lab. The apparent absence of background information on our new exam's enhanced quality and content has resulted in unwarranted concerns about it's duration. The CCIE Program team has been working hard to redesign, and greatly improve our nine year old, performance based, certification format. We have several objectives in mind including improved: efficiency, relevance, effectiveness and challenge. We also want to properly position the CCIE level certification content with that of the CCNA and CCNP certification tracks which came into being well after the CCIE expert level program was established. From the standpoint of our exam architecture, we needed to migrate toward a model that will scale to demand and position us to take advantage of innovative delivery options that better utilize technology and reduce the need for travel. Primary among all these objectives is our determination to maintain the legendary quality that is implicit in the CCIE name and reputation. We began the process by identifying those aspects of our current CCIE lab exam that are effectively covered in Cisco's CCNA and CCNP certification programs. We also identified those skills that are tested several times within the current exam. Content was evaluated based upon the objective of ensuring that we were sufficiently covering all relevant topics. Where appropriate, we shifted some of the lab's more fundamental, but still necessary, questions into a new and expanded qualification exam. The objective here is to do a better job of screening out candidates who would have passed the current written qualification test with no realistic hope of passing the lab exam. After strengthening the written qualification exam, eliminating duplication and lower level tasks, we discovered that adding an additional hour of lab time would allow us to deliver a higher quality CCIE lab exam in one expanded day. The overall testing process is reduced by far less than a day yet there is no longer a need for customers to invest in a second travel day. There is no single consideration more important then the quality and efficiency of this new exam so we have engaged several highly respected industry notables in our beta testing process. It's too early for me to announce the outcome of that process but I will say that the initial signs look very good. We hope for and expect to get their constructive criticism and plan to implement changes where necessary. If all goes well we will be in a position to move forward with this improved format in August. In review, our new testing format is a vast departure from our traditional approach in that it takes into account the existence of Cisco's CCNP and CCNA certification programs. There is no longer a need for the CCIE exam to certify a customer's proficiency in the area of intermediate networking skills. Our charter is to certify at the expert level and we now assume that, if the customer has passed our enhanced written qualification exam, their fundamental skills exist. By designing this recognition into our lab exam, we can eliminate time consuming questions that test and give points for demonstrating lower level skills. If the customer does not have those skills, they will simply fail the lab due to their inability to deal with the pace and complexity of the enhanced CCIE lab exam. Solid trouble shooting skills are also a required part of the customer's ability to master the enhanced lab exam so there is no longer the need to devote an entire section to trouble shooting. An individual who knows what they are doing will find our enhanced lab exam quite challenging. Someone who has yet to fully develop their skills will find it impossible. The net result of this format is greater efficiency in testing coupled with greater respect for our customer's time and resources. We see that as a win for everybody. Most people who are worried about the new CCIE lab exam format are concerned about the ongoing integrity of our program. Rest assured that no one cares more about the integrity of the CCIE program than we do. This new CCIE lab exam embodies the best of what we have learned over the nine years this program has been in existence and, from that perspective alone, it's the best of the breed. Importantly however, this new format also positions us to do some innovative things going forward that would not be possible without these changes. The revised and improved format will position us to handle the kind of exponential growth the CCIE program is seeing
Re: CCIE Written [7:9091]
I think you will be fine. The CCIE written does cover a great deal of material. But nothing you have not had yet throughout your studies. I would definitely hit anything with security related issues. When I took mine I did not find it at all difficult however I do believe that the questions can be very misleading at times. Read everything carefully and dont be afraid to put as an answer none of the above. I passed mine on the first try and had gone through the CCNA, NP, DP track. Good luck. Raul - Original Message - From: Ken Browne To: Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 1:09 PM Subject: CCIE Written [7:9091] Hello. I'm getting ready for my CCIE written examination on the 26th of June. I've recently gotten my NP and DP, and I'm studying for the CCIE written by reading the entire book of All-In-One CCIE Study guide by Roosevelt Giles. After I read the book, I'm going to take Boson tests and any other test or questions I can to prepare. Any other suggestions? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9101t=9091 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What is the Lab 'like'? [7:8366]
Go to www.cciebootcamp.com . They have pretty good write up. I know of 2 guys that just took itand I dont know but they both said they were going to smoke ityet they both never got invited back on the second day. Perhaps they undersetimated the amount of material and the little hidden mines along the way that this exam is famous for. The only thing I disagree with is the statement that one of the guys made. He did not really care that he failed but that he had seen it and now knew what to do. I think its this kind of attitude which will cause him more problems. If he tends to assume that the exam he took is the only blue print he will set himself up again to fail. Anyway, these guys work with me and said the exam was truly a monster. Raul - Original Message - From: NetEng Phx To: Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 1:14 PM Subject: What is the Lab 'like'? [7:8366] All, I am looking forward to a run at my CCIE next year and I am trying to visualize what the Lab test will be 'like'. I have read Cisco's material and searched around a bit, but that info falls short of what I am looking for here. I understand the lab consist of essentially two parts; build out and troubleshooting. How are the Problems/requirements presented? For example, are you given very high level requirements such as build a scalable network and you make all the design decisions, or are you likely to get more specific requirements such as; plan and addressing scheme to conserve IP space and router resources, or even more specific like: select and OSPF network type to use in your network? In the troubleshooting section, do they insert faults that you have to discover, or do they provide you with at least some clue of which high level functionality may or may not be working? Real world troubleshooting is usually in response to observed problem, or issue. Is it fair game to have something tweaked in the configs that is not expressed in any level of functionality, or lack there-of, on the test pod? Are the problems presented in writing, orally by the proctor, or both? Do you deliver to the proctor diagrams, and notes, or just the configs and cableing on the routers. Are you required to orally defend your design? I am not interested in info that violates the agreement with Cisco, just any input that can help me visualize what it will be like. Thanks! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=8377t=8366 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ISDN Simulator [7:8132]
I recommend the Teltone demonstrator for the a lab setup. Thats the one I use. I got it for 1685.00 Raul - Original Message - From: Tariq Azad To: Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 8:17 AM Subject: ISDN Simulator [7:8132] Hello Group ! Which ISDN simulator is an affordable and cheap for preparation of CCIE Lab. Thanks TARIQ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=8141t=8132 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Back to back Serial for Cisco 2621 [7:6497]
Try www.PacificCable.com Raul - Original Message - From: Joe Cremer To: Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 3:39 PM Subject: Back to back Serial for Cisco 2621 [7:6497] Does any one know a cable supplier for a dce/dte cable to connect two cisco 2621 routers with dual serial modules (wic-2t, with smart jack). I looked through the archives and found alot od 2500 cables but nothing for the new connector. Thanks Joe FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=6507t=6497 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ISDN demonstrator [7:3842]
I was able to pick 2 NT1s on e-bay for less than 50 bucks a piece and I got the demonstrator for 1685.00. Its significantly less than the 2685 price I was quoted for the ILS-2000. The demostrator works fine and the documentation is easy to read and get it up and running. Raul - Original Message - From: Daniel Cotts To: Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 1:05 PM Subject: RE: ISDN demonstrator [7:3842] The difference in price between the Demonstrator and ILS2000 makes a Demonstrator with two NT-1s less costly. Consider the Emutel simulators from Arca Technologies. -Original Message- From: Omer Ehsan Dar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 11:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ISDN demonstrator [7:3842] Hi all, Someone asked me what ISDN demonstartor would be needed to connect to a 2503 router. Teltone markets two the ISDn demonstrattor or the ILS2000. The ISDN demonstrator would require an NT1 while the ILS2000 would not. any comments are welcome. Omer FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=3852t=3842 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Scheduled reload [7:3869]
Yes you can type relaod at Raul - Original Message - From: Larry Ogun-Banjo To: Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 2:57 PM Subject: Scheduled reload [7:3869] Does anyone know if there is a command to boot/reload a router on a future date ie some type of scheduler? FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=3876t=3869 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2511 between cable modem and network [7:3465]
Alex, Yes you are correct all you need to do is set up the DCE end with the clock rate command and a valid ip and you should be ready to go. Raul - Original Message - From: To: Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 10:37 AM Subject: Re: 2511 between cable modem and network Mr. Fernandez, Yes ! That is it -- using the serial port on the 2511 to connect to the serial port of another router. I guess I'll have to set the serial port on the other router as DCE and to provide 'clockrate' for the serial connection ? Many thanks for sharing your experience. Alex Lee Rieter Corporation Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Raul F. Fernandez-IGLTo: OU cc: ou.com network 05/07/2001 10:00 AM Security Level:? Internal Alex, Basically you need to plan for what security needs you may have. What I like about nat overloading off the interface is that it is a routable ip and I can telnet to the interface and use the routers. Just use common sense and you should be ok. But NAT and enable secret should be enough to keep all your systems ok behind the router. I know some may think not, but I have never had a problem. I did have a friend try John the Ripper to try to force break the enable secret and that took almost 3 weeks based on the password I used. Make sure you use the enable secret and access-list. Also NAT by itself is a wonderful deterrent to getting your systems hacked. Basically you will need 1 extra routers (the way I do it) so that you can use the serial interface from the 2511 connect to another router whose ethernet interface goes to a hub or a switch. This is the way I did it. Now my home lab contains 7 routers and a few switches. Once you get it running it is a worth while exercise in the setup of NAT. Not to mention all the systems that can gain access to the internet from behind ye old router. Good Luck, Raul Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=3465t=3465 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: NEED CCIE in the WEST VIRGINIA AREA [7:2919]
Will a CCNA do? Raul - Original Message - From: Claudette Graham To: Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 2:02 PM Subject: NEED CCIE in the WEST VIRGINIA AREA [7:2919] The following is a job description I recently received from my client which needs to be filled immediately. We are looking for a Cisco Certified CCIE, living and working in West Virginia. Please send resume and rates as soon as possible. CCIE DURATION: 1 YEAR (CONTRACT) START DATE: 7/1/01 - 6/30/02 LOCATION: WEST VIRGINIA NEED TO FILL NO LATER THAN FRIDAY, MAY 4TH 2001 DESCRIPTION OF WORK ASSIGNMENT: The vendor and/or his protigies should be authorized to ser vice 3Com, Nortel Networks, and Enterasys/Cabletron equipment currently installed in State agencies. The vendor should provide proof from the manufacturer confirming this authorization to service the equipment and a list of the products covered. PROJECT / ENVIRONMENT DESCRIPTION: What type of work is being done? * Custom Application Development * Application Management Outsourcing * Package Integration * Application Enabling Design * Solutions Consulting Integration * Other network hardware installation LOCALS PLEASE PLEASE FORWARD A COPY OF YOUR RESUME AND CALL ME IMMEDIATELY...Thanks (:) ) Claudette * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Claudette Graham Technical Recruiter American Employment Solutions, Inc Phone: 800-995-6858 Fax: 888-995-8788 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Website: www.amesinc.org * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=2934t=2919 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Question about Teltone ISDN demonstrator [7:2687]
Anyone have some NT1s for sale cheap. I see that all my BRIs are S/t interfaces. Thank you, Raul - Original Message - From: Daniel Cotts To: Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 11:04 AM Subject: RE: Question about Teltone ISDN demonstrator [7:2687] The Demonstrator has U interfaces only. The other model can be either. Check out www.teltone.com -Original Message- From: Tommy Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 6:28 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Question about Teltone ISDN demonstrator [7:2687] Raul F. Fernandez wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I have 2523,2521,2504..if I get a demonstrator(Teltone) will I need external NT1s ? No. It comes with both S/T and U interfaces. Tommy FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=2759t=2687 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DLSW+ Problem [7:2599]
Have you checked your logs to see if the DLCIs where dropping? Service interruptions? This would cuase your dlsw peers to go down. - Original Message - From: Fawad Alam To: Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 3:14 PM Subject: DLSW+ Problem [7:2599] Hi I am having some performance problem with DLSW+. The peers are 2621 with IOS Version 12.0(3)T3 and at the other end I have Cisco 2612 with version 11.3(9)T. Our testing setup with obviously less load worked fine but when we moved to production the sessions started dropping. I have checked circuit load and it looks fine. Probably some DLSW+ parametes with some timing features or problem with IOS is causing this problem. Or may be its related to 2600 routers. Is there anyone who experienced same kinda issues in past. Any comments. Thanks... Peter _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=2604t=2599 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Question regarding OSPF [7:1599]
It should as long as you have the broadcast parameter on on the dialer map you will define for the aux port. Raul - Original Message - From: Rizzo Damian To: Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 10:50 AM Subject: Question regarding OSPF [7:1599] If I have 2 routers connected back-to-back via their AUX ports and I decided to implement OSPF, solely for the purposes of training...will OSPF function and update properly over the AUX ports? Thanks! -Rizzo FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=1618t=1599 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: HSRP [7:903]
Wesson, I have run into this before. I take it that you have the fastethernet interfaces on auto negotiate. Take them off auto negotiate ie duplex full, speed 100. This worked for me before especially running these T code IOSs on the 2600. Raul - Original Message - From: "SH Wesson" To: Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 10:02 AM Subject: HSRP [7:903] There are two routers: Rtr-A and Rtr-B. HSRP is running between these two groups with RTR-A set with a priority of 100 and RTR-B set with a priority of 150. Currently, RTR-A is the active router. However RTR-B shows that it's in a state of INIT. When I do a "show int fa0/0", it shows that the line is up but the protocol is down. The configuration looks fine and HSRP is tracking the serial interface. Any suggestion as to why RTR-B is not in standby state and how to resolve the problem to get it out of INIT state. If RTR-A goes down now, RTR-B will not pick up and become active as it stands now. Any assistance would be appreciated. Thanks. _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=905t=903 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Flash Question [7:214]
No they cannot. Raul - Original Message - From: "Vincent" To: Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 10:02 AM Subject: Flash Question [7:214] Hi; Does the 2500 flash can be used in 2600 series? Thanks Vincent FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=216t=214 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Job Opening Senior Network Engineer
I thought there was no advertising on this board? Raul - Original Message - From: "NP-BASS LEON" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "'Bradley J. Wilson'" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; "cisco" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 8:53 AM Subject: RE: Job Opening Senior Network Engineer DIDN'T REALIZE JC WAS UNEMPLOYED. -Original Message- From: Bradley J. Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 6:37 PM To: cisco Subject: Re: Job Opening Senior Network Engineer I think we're looking at yet *another* example of management's belief that technology can work miracles. Jesus Christ, CCIE # - Original Message - From: Butler, Gary To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 6:15 PM Subject: RE: Job Opening Senior Network Engineer 200K ;-) - Even at that money I would wager they will have a hard time filling that position. Do I have my head where the sun don't shine or do they? ;-) Gary Butler -Original Message- From: Lisa Marie Belong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 5:40 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Job Opening Senior Network Engineer Hello, We are a company located in Pleasanton, CA. (near Silicon Valley). We have an opening for Senior Network Engineer. Please see the following job description. If you are interested please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] Position: Senior Network Engineer Position Description: Provide engineering services and support for Federal, State, and Commercial customers, engineering and designing network migrations, upgrades that include complex routing, and intranet extranet security designs. Job Requirements: * Must have CCIE Cisco Certification * BA or BS degree preferred * Ability to document and provide in-depth reporting and analysis * 5 years of industry experience * 50-75% travel * Ability to work with a varied range of customer skill levels and knowledge Projects - Scope/Task * Assist with resolution of design issues and document accordingly * Assist with implementation plan * Identify risks and issues of conversion from existing design to new production design and document accordingly * Provide migration assistance to minimize or alleviate risks, where applicable * Identify the required maintenance testing and monitoring plan tools required to adequately monitor and maintain the implemented configuration * Assist in the disaster recovery design issues, as identified * Assist in implementing Core production enhancement * Assist with network diagrams and appropriate documentation identifying the physical and logical network paths and connections * Assist with technical network equipment design and implementation as necessary * Hands-on experience with IP, SNA, EGIP, RIP, BGP4 * Hands-on experience with e-business, high availability design * Proficient with VOIP, FOIP, and ATM Leadership/Supervision/ Project Management * Team leader-engineering programs recognized as one of the two top in country * Ability to Supervise and direct as necessary * Enterprise Management project * Network Reconfiguration * Create successful team relationships Network and Computer Skills Proficient in Software programming * Sun Net Manager, HP overview and other enterprise software * HP/ Network General Sniffer Skills and other network analysis * Programming experience with C++, PERL, KSH, Bourne Shell, PerlCGI, and others * Cisco IOS/PIX Firewalls /Cisco Switch IOS * Ability to setup and Maintain Cisco Secure, Cisco Works 2000, and Cisco Registrar * Extensive experience with ATM, FDDI, Gigabit, and Fast Ethernet networks including platforms: 7500 series, 4000 series, 2500/2600 series, 6509, 8510, LS1010, 5500, AS5300, PIX Firewall, Check Point Firewall, IP Chains Firewall Network Security Skills, Desired * VPN Configuration CISCO PIX, Check point VPN, Sonic Wall, Altiga (Now Cisco), Linux (Swan Tunnelv) or similar firewall products configurations * Syslong realtime and historical analysis using custom Perl Scripts * SPAM and Virus Control * Frequently used SSH, NMAP, SNORT, and other freeware tools * Ability to write authentication programs that use the Blowfish algorithms * Experience with Apache, openSSI, Certificates * Experienced with Netscape Proxy and Netscape Web servers including NSAPI * Ability to develop and implement Network Policy plan and Adherence Measure Stealth Network Communications offers state-of -the -art communication solutions for both government and commercial customers like the Library of Congress and the Oakland Raiders. Since our founding in 1994, we have designed, implemented and managed integrated voice data systems and networks for call-center, LAN/WAN, and security applications. Our experience with today's products, combined with our knowledge of emerging technologies, allows Stealth Network Communications to help our customers meet their strategic
Re: Token Ring interfaces in a UP/UP state?
See if you can find an Andrew MAU unit. These take RJ 45 and are very good. I picked up 2 on e-bay myself. Very good piece of equipment. And cheap. Raul - Original Message - From: "Niraj Palikhey" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 2:05 PM Subject: Re: Token Ring interfaces in a UP/UP state? OK, I went to Ebay and found a bunch of hubs for sale but I am not sure as to which type of hub would I need to connect 2 2502TR routers. I see an IBM 8226, 8228 and also other brands. I just need something simple and cost-effective. Thanks!! From: "Niraj Palikhey" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Token Ring interfaces in a UP/UP state? Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 13:45:49 -0500 What?? A mere $1.00. I am going to grab one right away!! Thanks!! From: Drew Simonis [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Niraj Palikhey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Token Ring interfaces in a UP/UP state? Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 10:02:26 -0500 Niraj Palikhey wrote: htmlDIVHi,/DIV DIVIs it possible to setup a Token Ring interface (2502 router), in a UP/UP state WITHOUT connecting it to a MAU, similiar to setting up an Ethernet int. with the #no keep command?? I gave a #no keep and #ring-speed 16 commandsnbsp;but this does not work? Is there any other I saw several people selling MAU's for $1 on e-bay... they are dirt cheap _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OSPF
Well it seems to me that you can use different process ids to simulate areas and reditrubute as needed so that would give EIGRP an OSPF area flavor. We do this at work quiet a bit for our European customer. Raul - Original Message - From: "Scott Jensen" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Brant Stevens" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: "'David Cooper'" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; "'Howard C. Berkowitz'" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 9:41 AM Subject: Re: OSPF While I see what you are saying. EIGRP is still advertised as a flat routing protocol by Cisco, while OSPF is advertised as being an "area-based hierarchical system" with features found in that type of protocol. Scalabiliby being a very important feature at that. Scott Brant Stevens wrote: The use of IP address summarization creates FS query boundaries, and gives you a sense of hierarchy, but, you are correct in that there is not an area-based hierarchical system... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott Jensen Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 12:58 PM To: David Cooper Cc: Howard C. Berkowitz; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: OSPF also note in your reading that EIGRP is Flat where OSPF is hierarchical similar to BGP. Scott David Cooper wrote: just what I was looking for :) Thanks, Dave On Wednesday 14 March 2001 23:34, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote: Hey all, I've been reading into BSCN here lately with Cisco press books. In the book there is a fairly detailed discussion of OSPF. I'm not in the least opposed to learning it. One thing I would like to understand is why an organization would use it. Is this used in ISP's? What are the advantages of it over say, EIGRP? I always see it compared to RIPv1 but I find it silly for advanced routing protocols to be compared with ripV1. I'll preface my remarks with the observation that all three advanced IGPs: OSPF, EIGRP, and ISIS, all work well. ISIS is more a niche protocol for ISPs. There are pros and cons for each one. OSPF and ISIS require structured network topology from the very beginning, while EIGRP is much more tolerant -- up to a point. For me, the definitive comment came over a few beers shared with a distinguished Cisco engineer. He observed, "to build a really big network, you absolutely have to have clue." He burped loudly, and then went on. "EIGRP has the advantage of letting you stay clueless for longer." The biggest argument against EIGRP is that it is Cisco proprietary. Being proprietary has implications beyond the multivendor question. Because some of the EIGRP mechanisms have not been published by Cisco, there isn't the external knowledge base about EIGRP that there is about OSPF and ISIS. Protocol and network architects have a very deep understanding how OSPF and ISIS will behave and what their strengths and weaknesses are, but no one who hasn't been a Cisco employee can have the same sort of insight. For similar topologies, EIGRP generally needs less processing than OSPF. On the other hand, with ever-faster processors, this may not be a significant constraint. In a fair test, with equivalent timers set to equivalent values, both converge very fast, and convergence time should not be an issue with any protocol (assuming reasonable network topology). EIGRP may be able to find an alternate path faster when that path goes through a neighbor, but OSPF is faster if the alternate path might be several hops away. If you run Appletalk or IPX routing, there is a definite advantage to using EIGRP. EIGRP also can bring incremental updating to a Netware 3.x environment that can't be upgraded. A few things to consider. Please forgive me if this is shortsighted of me. Thanks in advance, Dave _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
Re: Cisco share in downfall
Yes, I see the end is near.I wonder if this would work: Mac-Mac---Mac--Mac Look folks, so what if CISCO is going down and Juniper is better in some respectslearn something from Microsoft. Its hard to kill somthing that is so entrenched in the industry or for that matter is the industry. Anywayone day CISCO will just buy Juniper and if you are good you will always have a job. - Original Message - From: "Mask Of Zorro" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 1:07 PM Subject: Re: Cisco share in downfall Campbell's soup cans are a proprietary solution. I prefer a more open solution, like the soup cans from Progresso. Besides, Progresso offers a turnkey soup solution, no need to turn to add water or anything [=`) Z From: "Lance Hubbard" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: "Lance Hubbard" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Cisco share in downfall Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 09:30:22 -0800 Sure, My Manager told me to stop work on all new network projects, and implement the following solution for full-mesh, Point-to-Point network connectivity. Campbell soup can-String-Campbell soup can Pow! instant solution!!!...and what a savings! Cheers, Lance From: "ahmadbilal" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: "ahmadbilal" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco share in downfall Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 09:32:02 +0500 Dear all, i would like to know your comments and suggestions,as we all know IT is in shaky ground these days the hype surrounding it is fizzling out.We the network engineers are facing more and more competion and the openings once prjected seem far,what should we do ?should we continue our quest should we keep at networking or shift towards system(unix,sun,etc) or should we wait . the situation maynot be that gloomy as ive projected but we need a serious rethinking to survive ,any suggestions. Regards, _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: upgrade bootstrap
No worries you are fine. - Original Message - From: "Thomas" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 6:40 AM Subject: upgrade bootstrap Hi Group - I just upgraded the bootstrap for my 2501. Whenever I bootup or reload the router, I got a warnning message: %Sys-4-New-Config: IOS 12.0 or later may not be correctly understood (something like that) I wonder if this is OK or there's something wrong? BTW I am running IOS version 12.0(15). Thanks All. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OK. I feel dumb but asking anyway
Natasha, I love that name...anyway here is the definition: Throttle - Number of times the receiver on the port was disabled, possibly due to buffer or processor overload. Take care, Raul - Original Message - From: "Natasha" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "CCIE Group study list" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 11:41 PM Subject: OK. I feel dumb but asking anyway When doing a (show int) on a 2500 part of the output says "shinterface" I hope that's show interface! Would hate to see what a "shinterface" looks like. lol It also says something about runts, giants, and throttles. What the heck are throttles? -- Natasha Flazynski http://www.ciscobot.com My Cisco information site. http://www.botbuilders.com Artificial Intelligence and Linux development A bus station is where a bus stops. A train station is where a train stops. On my desk, I have a work station... _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
