Cisco works 2000 cd one 5th Edition [7:63023]
I am trying to upgrade to CW2000 5th edition but am having some problems. When attempting to suspend all jobs using: cwjava -cw install_directory com.cisco.nm.cmf.jrm.DisableJobs I recieve the following message: "unable to launch JVM" Has anyone else run into this problem? Many thanks in advance Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=63023&t=63023 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Catalyst Port Counters [7:64355]
Does anyone know why the Giant counter below shows "-" as opposed to a numerical counter? Cisco Works is showing the trunk as suffering from a high number of oversize errors but the port counters don't back this up. I've tried a clear counters but this has made no difference. Sessions_A (enable) sh po 1/1 Port Name Status Vlan Level Duplex Speed Type - -- -- -- -- -- - - --- 1/1 to_cab_AA connected trunk normal full 1000 1000BaseSX Port Trap IfIndex - --- 1/1 disabled 3 Port Broadcast-Limit Broadcast-Drop --- -- 1/1 65.00 % 0 Port Send FlowControlReceive FlowControl RxPause TxPause Unsupported adminoper adminoper opcodes - --- --- --- 1/1 on on on on 0 0 0 Port Align-Err FCS-ErrXmit-Err Rcv-ErrUnderSize - -- -- -- -- - 1/1 0 0 0 0 0 Port Single-Col Multi-Coll Late-Coll Excess-Col Carri-Sen Runts Giants - -- -- -- -- - - -- --- 1/1 0 0 0 0 0 0 - Many thanks in advance. Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=64355&t=64355 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2511 Reverse Telnet [7:65819]
Help please! I have just bought a 2511 and am attempting to use it for reverse telnet. I have connected each of the octal cable RJ-45 cables into a console port. I initiate a reverse telnet session and can recieve data, i.e. when I power on the target router I recieve boot loader etc messages up until "press return to start". The problem is I can't send anything, pressing return doesn't work. I am reseanably confident that I have entered all the right commands. Can anyone shed any light on this? Many thanks in advance. Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=65819&t=65819 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IGRP Metric calculation [7:66062]
When calculating the metric of an IGRP route (with non-default 'K' values) which load and reliability values does one use? Do you use the highest, lowest or average value for the entire route? Also if anyone could point me to a document on the above it would be appreciated. Many thanks in advance. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66062&t=66062 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IGRP Metric calculation [7:66062]
When calculating the metric of an IGRP route (with non-default 'K' values) which load and reliability values does one use? Do you use the highest, lowest or average value for the entire route? Also if anyone could point me to a document on the above it would be appreciated. Many thanks in advance. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66181&t=66062 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
R&S CCIE Written Question [7:66619]
Does the R&S written exam include any questions on EIGRP being used for IPX or Appletalk? Many thanks Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66619&t=66619 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco 2511 Hardware Issue [7:66662]
Has anyone experienced, or heard of, the following problem: I recently bought a 2nd hand 2511 but only async interfaces 9-16 work. 1-8 receive data but do not transmit. Could it possibly be due to one of the numerous jumper settings? many thanks in advance. Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2&t=2 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: so how does IGRP unequal load-balancing work anyway? [7:66667]
I can't remember the exact terminology but an IGRP router is aware of a neighbors metric to a destination as well as its own metric to the same destination. The router will only consider routes to be valid if the upstream router's metric to the destination is lower than its own metric to the same destination. This prevents the problems you mentioned below. You may want to get a second opinion on this! Tim ""nwo"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > It occurs to me that I do not understand how IGRP unequal load balancing > works. > > Yes, I understand what the commands are, and I am well aware of the > intricacies involved in fast-switching and CEF. So please don't respond by > telling me to configure 'variance' or stuff like that. I already know all > that. > > What I don't understand is this. A fundamental part of EIGRP unequal load > balancing is the concept of the feasible successor, where routes of unequal > metric to a particular destination will be considered only if the > corresponding neighbor is a feasible successor for the destination in > question. This is in order to prevent the problem of packets being sent to > to a router that is actually further away from the destination than the > sending router is to that destination. > > Yet, I am aware of no such safeguards in IGRP. IGRP has no such concept of > a topology table with neighbor's advertised distances and whatnot. > Therefore it seems that packets could easily be forwarded away from the > destination. Furthermore, it would seem to me that packets could actually > bounce back and forth between 2 routers for awhile. > > Please say it ain't so. Yet I am unaware of any construct within IGRP that > would prevent it from being so. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=7&t=7 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
UK based CCIE training [7:66825]
Can anyone recommend a UK based CCIE training company, i.e. one which provide mentoring, training material etc? Has anyone got any general views on this approach to CCIE studies? Thanks in advance. Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66825&t=66825 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Many-to-one NAT on 2611XM [7:70193]
We are going to be NATing up to 12 Internet Proxies behind a single registered IP address on a Cisco 2611XM. Has anyone tried anything similar or is anyone aware of any performance implications of this configuration? Many thanks in advance Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70193&t=70193 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Catalyst 3550 [7:70449]
Does anyone know of a command which will show the flavour of GBIC in a particular slot of a 3550? Many thanks in advance. Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70449&t=70449 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Route Metrics [7:70958]
I have a situation whereby I want to perform load balancing across 2 links. The problem is that the router which will have to perform the load balancing learns one route via EIGRP and the other from a static route. I know how to alter the administrative distance of the static route but I'm not sure on how to tweak the metric. I guess I need to either increase the metric of the static route of reduce the metric of the EIGRP route. Any suggestions would be appreciated. Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70958&t=70958 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IOS Documentation [7:41577]
I have recently been asked to document the various IOS images used within our network to be used as a baseline. Has anyone had experience in putting together this kind of document? Many thanks in advance Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41577&t=41577 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ISDN & MICA Modems [7:42516]
We are currently using a 3640 with PRI and MICA modems (all dial in users are authenticated via a TACACS server). For each user who dials in using an ISDN modem we configure a dialer interface with the users name in the "dialer remote-name" command. Is there anyway of avoiding this configuration task as more and more users are wanting to use ISDN modems as opposed to analogue modems? Thanks in advance. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42516&t=42516 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco Secure Access Control Server [7:44328]
With regards to the TACACS+ accounting logs produced by ACS, does anyone know what "nas port re-used" means? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=44328&t=44328 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PIX Firewall [7:46423]
Does anyone know of a way to clear or tear-down individual connections on a PIX Firewall? By using the "show conn" command I can see the connections I want to clear but don't now how to. Thanks in advance. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=46423&t=46423 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Book Recommendation [7:55805]
Can anyone recommend a good book covering Ethernet. Would such a book be useful for CCIE studies? Thanks in advance. Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55805&t=55805 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HDLC STAC Compression [7:56073]
Is anyone out there using STAC compression on HDLC links in a live network? If so what is the maximum speed link you would apply it to and has it brought significant benefits. Many thanks in advance Tim Champion Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56073&t=56073 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GBIC Types [7:56468]
Does anyone know of a show command on a Catalyst 5k which will show the type of GBIC installed, SH, LX/LH etc? Many thanks Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56468&t=56468 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco Works 2000 problem [7:56601]
I have a problem with Cisco Works 2000 whereby the ANI server has the busy flag set. This is effecting many of the services. I have tried all of the suggestions on CCO but it has made no difference. Has anyone else seen this before? Cheers Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56601&t=56601 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hyperterminal [7:56796]
Does anyone know which setting needs changing to get HyperTerminal to paste configs into a Cisco device without stuttering? Thanks Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56796&t=56796 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCIE Lab Kit [7:57099]
Can anyone point me in the direction of a definitive kit list for a CCIE study lab? many thanks Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57099&t=57099 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Confused from London [7:57780]
We beat the Ozzies at rugby and we'll do the same at soccer in Febuary. As for the cricket, well its not over yet.. ""Peter Kingston"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > 5 games of cricket Between Australia and England have just commenced... > Australia won the first game very convincingly > > Australia should go a clean sweep > > -- > Regards, > > Peter Kingston > Telstra BigPond Direct > Freecall 1800 066 594 > ""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Well you better explain this to us Yankees. Our baseball season is over > > unfortunatley, and now all we have is football (ugh). Well we have hockey > > and basketball too, I guess, and they're a litte better! :-) > > > > Priscilla > > > > Peter Kingston wrote: > > > > > > I just as a little bit of friendly rivalry, > > > > > > I believe there is more than yourself confused in London, > > > naming your > > > cricketers 5 zips looks like a fair chance > > > > > > -- > > > Regards, > > > > > > Peter Kingston > > > Telstra BigPond Direct > > > Freecall 1800 066 594 > > > wrote in message > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > Someone asked me a question which confused me:- > > > > If i ping a network broadcast from a host on a different > > > network, which > > > > passes through a cisco router why do i get replies from > > > certain devices. > > > > > > > > The router has directed broadcast forwarding disabled. > > > > I thought the router would therefore drop the packet > > > > > > > > Any thoughts > > > > Thanks > > > > -P Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57876&t=57780 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PA-VXA [7:50109]
Does anyone know the maximum cable distance that can be used between a PA-VXA-1TE1 and a PBX (with the PA configured for E1)? Thanks in advance Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=50109&t=50109 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: why my input error and CRC always same [7:54516]
I would suggest that "input errors" is a general counter for all input errors and that these are then split down in to more sepcific error types, in this case CRC. Can anyone confirm this? ""Larry Letterman"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Packet Errors > If you have a large amount of alignment errors, FCS errors, or late > collisions, this may indicate: > > > Duplex mismatch > > Bad NICs > > Cable problems (causing mangled packets, flapping ports, and so on) > > For more information on duplex mismatch errors, see Configuring and > Troubleshooting Ethernet 10/100Mb Half/Full Duplex Auto-Negotiation. The > most common issue with speed/duplex is that customers manually set the > speed/duplex on the switch, but not on the workstation/server. Auto > speed/duplex on one side and 100/Full-duplex on the other side is a > misconfiguration and will result in a duplex mismtach. > > Larry Letterman > Cisco Systems > > > Sim, CT (Chee Tong) wrote: > > >Hi.. Some users complaint to me that their application getting > >disconnection. I have fixed the speed and duplex of their switch port at > >both sides and changed the cable but still the same. And the strange thing > >is that all the problem ports are all having the same error pattern-same > >number of input errors and CRC. The rest of errors are all zero-as shown > >below.Those other ports that have different number input errors and CRC > >are not having disconnection problem. Any idea what can I do on those > >ports that having disconnection problem? > > > > > > > > > > > >SW4>sh int fas0/21 > > > >FastEthernet0/21 is up, line protocol is up > > > > Hardware is Fast Ethernet, address is 00d0.790c.d315 (bia 00d0.790c.d315) > > > > MTU 1500 bytes, BW 10 Kbit, DLY 100 usec, > > > > reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255 > > > > Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set > > > > Keepalive not set > > > > Full-duplex, 100Mb/s, 100BaseTX/FX > > > > ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00 > > > > Last input never, output 00:00:00, output hang never > > > > Last clearing of "show interface" counters 5d21h > > > > Queueing strategy: fifo > > > > Output queue 0/40, 0 drops; input queue 0/75, 0 drops > > > > 5 minute input rate 2000 bits/sec, 5 packets/sec > > > > 5 minute output rate 52000 bits/sec, 23 packets/sec > > > > 2859951 packets input, 283856132 bytes > > > > Received 213447 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles > > > > 152 input errors, 152 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored > > > > 0 watchdog, 0 multicast > > > > 0 input packets with dribble condition detected > > > > 8585472 packets output, 2364752071 bytes, 0 underruns > > > > 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 0 interface resets > > > > 0 babbles, 0 late collision, 0 deferred > > > > 0 lost carrier, 0 no carrier > > > > 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out > > > >Cat29-L7-4> > > > > > >== > >De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en > >is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht > >onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en > >de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. > >== > >The information contained in this message may be confidential > >and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you > >receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents > >herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail. > > > > > >== > -- > > Larry Letterman > Network Engineer > Cisco Systems Inc. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54539&t=54516 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCIE Practical exam question [7:54783]
Does anyone know if the CCIE practical exam is 'regional specific', i.e. will I need in-depth knowledge of T-1 & T-3 services despite living and working in the UK? Many thanks in advance Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54783&t=54783 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GRE Tunnel & EIGRP [7:72093]
I am planning on using a GRE tunnel across a MPLS VPN in order to create an EIGRP neighbour relationship across the cloud. The VPN link will be running at 8Mbps. The routers terminating the tunnel will be a 3640 and RSM. Does anyone know if this will adversely impact the processors and/or throughput of the link. Many thanks Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=72093&t=72093 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CEF & Per-packet load sharing [7:72232]
Does anyone know of any performance limitations relating to the use of per-packet load sharing in conjunction with CEF & EIGRP? I only want to use it on 2 VLAN interfaces so is it possible to configure on a per-interface basis or just globally? Many thanks Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=72232&t=72232 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Per-destination load balancing [7:72944]
Could someone please confirm the following to be true (taken from CCO): "Per-destination load balancing allows the router to distribute packets based on the destination address, and uses multiple paths to achieve load sharing. Packets for a given source-destination host pair are guaranteed to take the same path, even if multiple paths are available. For example, given two paths to the same network, all packets for destination1 on that network go over the first path, all packets for destination2 on that network go over the second path, and so on. Per-destination load balancing is enabled by default when you start the router, and is the preferred load balancing for most situations." It was my understanding that per-destination load balancing was based on the destination address only and not on the source/destination pair. If someone could clarify it would be much appreciated. Cheers Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=72944&t=72944 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Per-destination load balancing [7:72944]
Thank you for your replies, think I've got it now. ""Tim Champion"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Could someone please confirm the following to be true (taken from CCO): > > "Per-destination load balancing allows the router to distribute packets > based on the destination address, and uses multiple paths to achieve load > sharing. Packets for a given source-destination host pair are guaranteed to > take the same path, even if multiple paths are available. For example, given > two paths to the same network, all packets for destination1 on that network > go over the first path, all packets for destination2 on that network go over > the second path, and so on. Per-destination load balancing is enabled by > default when you start the router, and is the preferred load balancing for > most situations." > > It was my understanding that per-destination load balancing was based on the > destination address only and not on the source/destination pair. > > > > If someone could clarify it would be much appreciated. > > > > Cheers > > > > Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73009&t=72944 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HSRP + ARP Problem [7:73098]
Bit of a strange one this. We have 2 7206 routers running HSRP that are support by our telecoms provider. The fast ethernet interface of each is connected into our 2950 along with a firewall. >From the switch, or firewall, I can ping either of the 'real' ip addresses but not the virtual address. I have used debug arp and seen the arp request go out for the virtual address (the telco has done the same and see's the request come in) but there is no reply. If we configure a static arp entry it all works fine. Anyone ever experienced anything like this??? Many thanks Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73098&t=73098 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can 802.1q & isl co-exist on same network?? [7:73511]
They can run on the same network but a pair of directly connected switches must be using the same trunking protocol. Tim ""dj"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Have a production campus LAN network primarily running with 3508Gs and > 3524XL data switches with gigabit fiber uplinks. All switches are > currently running ISL Vlan trunking between the uplink ports. There's > also a 2620 router running ISL fastethernet subinterfaces configured > with encapsulation ISL. > > I have some non-cisco network devices that only support 802.1q vlan > trunking. I already know the 802.1q trunking on non-cisco equipment > works ok with cisco devices running 802.1q trunking. > > However, when I deploy the non-cisco equipment in the production campus > LAN, can I have some trunk ports running 802.1q trunking and other trunk > ports running ISL. Bottom line: Can ISL and 802.1q co-exist or do I > have to migrate entire LAN to 802.1q vlan trunking?? > > regards, > dj > **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: > http://shop.groupstudy.com > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73513&t=73511 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: Studying Switching [7:75030]
All the info relating to this book is good and I'm going to buy on the back of these reviews but... what makes people write switching related poems? ""Nakul Malik"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Hi all, > I started off studying routing and found it to be a topic that interested me > a lot. I just couldn't get enough of halabi Doyle and the rest. I studied a > lot, practiced a lot and was thrilled when I passed the exam in beta. > > Next I started studying for switching. That didn't turn out as well as I > thought it would. I couldn't just work up the same level of interest. I have > been analyzing the reasons and have come up with the following: > 1. I've never worked with switches much, so I don't know too much about > them, as opposed to routers. > 2. Study materials. > > I've been wondering, has anyone else faced similar problems in their quest > for CCNP. > > Also, could someone recommend some good materials/resources for switching > other than the official Cisco book? > > Any/all answers would be appreciated. > Thanks. > -N > > -- > Nakul Malik > > H-342 > New Rajendra Nagar > New Delhi - 110060 > > Mobile: +91-9811424477 > Ph: +91-11- 2582 3488 > +91-11- 2585 0155 > Fax:: +91-11- 2575 2904 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: > http://shop.groupstudy.com > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=75165&t=75030 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
