RE: Updated: Cable modems & two 2501s [7:13649]
Hey Frank, I'm trying to hook up a Cisco 1750 ethernet port & a Linksys router to my Roadrunner cable modem. The 2nd ethernet port on the 1750 will have lab routers connected to it, the Linksys router (4-port switch) will have a few computers connected to it. I want all to have access to the Internet this way...do you think it will work? Thanx Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=34241&t=13649 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
San Diego.. [7:40498]
Does anyone know of any instructor led CCIE Security level training available in the San Diego area? I'm not necessarily talking about "boot camps", but a class longer than a week or so. Also, are there any members here in the San Diego area with the CCIE Security lab as a goal? Thanx for any reply. I can be contacted at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40498&t=40498 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Config [7:20759]
I need help w/ a little config info... RtrA (s0 192.1.1.4)& RtrB (s0 192.1.1.3) connected via serial cable. They can each ping each other. RtrB has a PC (ip address 192.168.1.1)connected to its' e0 int (192.168.1.10) through a hub. How can I ping from RtrA (s0 192.1.1.4)to the PC attached to RtrB(e0 192.168.1.10)? Do I need a static route on RtrB from the s0 interface to the e0 interface? TIA. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=20759&t=20759 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Config [7:20759]
Hey Paul, I'm not getting any communication between s0(192.1.1.3) & e0 (192.168.1.10) on RtrB using an extended ping with e0 as the destination and s0 as the source. I entered "ip route 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 e0" and it doesn't show up in the route table. I entered "ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 e0" and it shows up in the route table as "Gateway of last resort is 0.0.0.0 to network 0.0.0.0 and it still doesn't work. I know this is a simple thing to do, but it's not working out for me. What am I not doing Thanx Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=20797&t=20759 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Config [7:20759]
That's what I'm having a problem with. RtrB can ping the PC & RtrA can ping the RtrB e0 interface, but won't ping the PC. It was mentioned to make the default gateway on the PC the RtrB e0 address. I'll try that & see what happens... thanx to all your help. That was exactly the answer I needed. Big THANX to whom ever said make the e0 interface the default gateway of the PC. I'm not sure if I really clearly understand why the PC would respond to RtrB's pings and not RtrA's. anyway. Another example of the benefits to joining a group such as this... hope I can return the favor in the future !!! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=21101&t=20759 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Security for router connected to Cable Service [7:43322]
Hello, have you come up w/ a solution to allow connections into your network, say to an ftp server from the outside, through a router using the IOS Firewall Feature Set? I could use some input or any ideas on how to configure that. Thanx for any suggestions Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=53597&t=43322 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ftp access... [7:53677]
I'm trying to provide access from the internet through a router to an ftp server on a private network... this is part of the config I have so far: ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.6.2 21 interface Ethernet0 21 Ethernet0 has the global address and 192.168.6.2 is the ftp server on the private side. I also have the following; ip nat inside source list 5 pool global overload ! Tells which addresses to "nat" using pool named "global" for outbound connections Am I creating problems having 2 'ip nat' statments? Do I need to apply access lists as well? I need some help, TIA... Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=53677&t=53677 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ftp access... [7:53677]
Thank you for your response Pricilla, I'm on my way to your page now. This is just a project for myself to have access to certain files when I'm away from home, not a public access ftp server. My private network is currently behind a 1750 w/ IOS Firewall Feature Set until I can get a PIX. I have a syslog server running & get a message that my access list permitted tcp (1 packet) from my session attempt. I am trying to ftp via browser using dial-up & Win 98se. I'll keep trying Thanx again for your response ! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=53775&t=53677 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
