RE: content service switch 11500? [7:21112]
This would be possible, but the only catch is that you'd have to be running RIP, OSPF, or using static routing (since those are the only routing options with the CSS platform). BJ -Original Message- From: steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 3:45 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: content service switch 11500? [7:21112] i want to use 2 web switches 11500 to load-balance 2 pixs , how could i design it ? Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=21122&t=21112 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT:Teaching Lessons [7:20265]
Actually, I'm glad he posted it - pretty much sums up my feelings about the whole thing. (By the way, Harry Browne isn't an "overnight" expert on foreign relations. He's *been* one for a while now.) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 9:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: OT:Teaching Lessons [7:20265] And your point in sending this to the list was?? Trolling at this point is my only guess Interesting how many people become foreign policy experts overnight.. "Raynold D Cruz" cc: Sent by:Subject: OT:Teaching Lessons [7:20265] nobody@groupstud y.com 09/18/2001 09:09 AM Please respond to "Raynold D Cruz" > > > by Harry Browne > > > September 12, 2001 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=20270&t=20265 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: route summarisation question [7:19970]
Yeah, and good luck sneaking this thing into any Cisco cert test or the Lab. :-) (Now I've got this mental image of someone swallowing a condom with a rolled-up slip of paper in it... ;-) -Original Message- From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 2:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: route summarisation question [7:19970] Your correct, here is the table and the URL to a neat little subnet calcuator http://www.cisco.com/techtools/ip_addr.html - IP Class: B IP Address: 172.21.134.0 Mask Bits: 5 Subnet Mask: 255.255.248.0 Subnets:30+1IP Major Net:172.21.0.0 Hosts/Subnet: 2046Major Net Bcast: 172.21.255.255 Subnets for Fixed Length Subnet Masking . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No. Subnet HostsHostsBroadcast Address From To Address 0 172.21.0.0 172.21.0.1 172.21.7.254 172.21.7.255 1 172.21.8.0 172.21.8.1 172.21.15.254 172.21.15.255 2 172.21.16.0 172.21.16.1 172.21.23.254 172.21.23.255 3 172.21.24.0 172.21.24.1 172.21.31.254 172.21.31.255 4 172.21.32.0 172.21.32.1 172.21.39.254 172.21.39.255 5 172.21.40.0 172.21.40.1 172.21.47.254 172.21.47.255 6 172.21.48.0 172.21.48.1 172.21.55.254 172.21.55.255 7 172.21.56.0 172.21.56.1 172.21.63.254 172.21.63.255 8 172.21.64.0 172.21.64.1 172.21.71.254 172.21.71.255 9 172.21.72.0 172.21.72.1 172.21.79.254 172.21.79.255 10 172.21.80.0 172.21.80.1 172.21.87.254 172.21.87.255 11 172.21.88.0 172.21.88.1 172.21.95.254 172.21.95.255 12 172.21.96.0 172.21.96.1 172.21.103.254 172.21.103.255 13 172.21.104.0 172.21.104.1 172.21.111.254 172.21.111.255 14 172.21.112.0 172.21.112.1 172.21.119.254 172.21.119.255 15 172.21.120.0 172.21.120.1 172.21.127.254 172.21.127.255 16 172.21.128.0 172.21.128.1 172.21.135.254 172.21.135.255 17 172.21.136.0 172.21.136.1 172.21.143.254 172.21.143.255 18 172.21.144.0 172.21.144.1 172.21.151.254 172.21.151.255 19 172.21.152.0 172.21.152.1 172.21.159.254 172.21.159.255 20 172.21.160.0 172.21.160.1 172.21.167.254 172.21.167.255 21 172.21.168.0 172.21.168.1 172.21.175.254 172.21.175.255 22 172.21.176.0 172.21.176.1 172.21.183.254 172.21.183.255 23 172.21.184.0 172.21.184.1 172.21.191.254 172.21.191.255 24 172.21.192.0 172.21.192.1 172.21.199.254 172.21.199.255 25 172.21.200.0 172.21.200.1 172.21.207.254 172.21.207.255 26 172.21.208.0 172.21.208.1 172.21.215.254 172.21.215.255 27 172.21.216.0 172.21.216.1 172.21.223.254 172.21.223.255 28 172.21.224.0 172.21.224.1 172.21.231.254 172.21.231.255 29 172.21.232.0 172.21.232.1 172.21.239.254 172.21.239.255 30 172.21.240.0 172.21.240.1 172.21.247.254 172.21.247.255 31 172.21.248.0 172.21.248.1 172.21.255.254 172.21.255.255 The New Guy wrote: > > A buddy and I are currently preparing for the BSCN exam. > One of the review questions involving route summarization is as follows: > > 172.21.136.0/24 and 172.21.143.0/24 can be summarized as: ?? > > We both came to the same conclusion: > > ^ > 172.21.136.0 -> 10101100.00010101.10001000. > 172.21.143.0 -> 10101100.00010101.1000. > ^ > > Both addresses have the first 20 bits in common so the summarized address > would > be: > 172.21.136.0/21 > > However, Cisco says the answer is 172.21.134.0/21 > Can someone please confirm we summarized this route right. I think the test > from Cisco is wrong, typo or something > > Dyland -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19990&t=19970 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: traceroute [7:19963]
So would the "missing hop" syndrome be caused by a router or firewall which is filtering any and all UDP packets (which a good portion of them are)? -Original Message- From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 1:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: traceroute [7:19963] At 01:14 PM 9/14/01, Wilson, Bradley wrote: >What you're seeing isn't a problem related to timeouts. Essentially, all a >"trace" is is a series of regular ICMP pings with incremening TTL fields. Agreed, but just wanted to add that Cisco and Unix send a UDP packet when doing traceroute, not a ping. Microsoft sends an ICMP ping. >If a particular router (say, the last hop when your TTL is set to 4) is >configured to not respond to pings, you'll get a timeout. Only the last device would respond to the ping anyway. But the router could be rate limiting TTL exceeded messages or configured not to send them. Priscilla >However, the >routers on either side of it (the ones you hit when your TTL is set to 3 or >5, respectively) may respond to pings normally. Really nothing you can do >about the one that timed out if it's not under your administrative control. > >BJ > > > >-Original Message- >From: khramov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 12:06 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: traceroute [7:19963] > > >sometimes when I do a traceroute it skeeps some routers. Is there any >way to adjusst time out or something to get traceroute to show all the >routers that packet is going through? > >Regards, >Alex > >[GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name >of khramov.vcf] Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19988&t=19963 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: traceroute [7:19963]
What you're seeing isn't a problem related to timeouts. Essentially, all a "trace" is is a series of regular ICMP pings with incremening TTL fields. If a particular router (say, the last hop when your TTL is set to 4) is configured to not respond to pings, you'll get a timeout. However, the routers on either side of it (the ones you hit when your TTL is set to 3 or 5, respectively) may respond to pings normally. Really nothing you can do about the one that timed out if it's not under your administrative control. BJ -Original Message- From: khramov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 12:06 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: traceroute [7:19963] sometimes when I do a traceroute it skeeps some routers. Is there any way to adjusst time out or something to get traceroute to show all the routers that packet is going through? Regards, Alex [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of khramov.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19979&t=19963 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 5505 [7:19754]
This is just a guess, but doesn't the switch have an sc0 interface, even if it does have an RSM installed? If so, does the sc0 have an IP address and default gateway (probably the RSM) set? BJ -Original Message- From: khramov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 9:47 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 5505 [7:19754] I've got a 5505 and I can not telnet into the switch portion of it from my work station. To get into it I have ot telnet into RSM module first and from there I telnet into the switch intself. I check 5505 it does not have an ip permit list configured on it. So why I can not telnet into the switch. Regards, Alex Khramov [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of khramov.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19762&t=19754 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Land Locked Networking Projects [7:19653]
Two things which come to mind right off the top of my head...
1) word of mouth ("Hey, I know a guy in Boston who might be able to help us
out...")
2) local headhunters
Any others? I'm thinking most companies will just wait it out, though, due
to mistrust of allowing in too many "outsiders" into their projects.
BJ
-Original Message-
From: Michael Snyder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 3:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OT: Land Locked Networking Projects [7:19653]
Due to the airlines being shutdown, I just had a mental image of networking
companies faced with choice of very long road trips or not finishing
important projects.
Anyone know how to link up local companies and the now long distance
networking projects?
Wish all the Cisco partners had a single mailing list or forum.
I don't mean to disregard the last two days, just that we need to start
moving the ball foward.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19657&t=19653
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: US Stock [7:19433]
I thought you said earlier he was an atheist. Which is it? -Original Message- From: Allen May [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 2:51 PM To: Wilson, Bradley Subject: Re: US Stock [7:19433] Hitler was a Jew. - Original Message - From: "Wilson, Bradley" To: Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 11:42 AM Subject: RE: US Stock [7:19433] > Hitler was Catholic, and claims in "Mein Kampf" that "my conduct is in > accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator." > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Allen May [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 12:11 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: US Stock [7:19433] > > > Wy off topic, but since the atheists got their say: > > Unbelievable the responses that came from this post. I agree. Amazing how > many said not to push religion by pushing atheism right after you mentioned > this. In a Christian society is is usually the atheists or Satanic cults > that commit the most horrible crimes, not the Christians. (Timothy McVaugh, > Hitler, most mass murderers of history, etc). It goes against everything > Christians believe in to do such a thing. And, I believe the Holy War is > about the only one I can think of in the name of their God. All others were > over oil, land, expanding an empire, etc. Saying "May God be with us" > during war doesn't make it for God. It's a plea by the soldiers forced into > the conflict by government to save their souls when they are pushed into > commiting acts of murder for their country/government. Christians have > always had to fight for their right to practice due to others pushing their > beliefs on them & trying to take their freedom of religion away. All the > while, saying it's bad to push beliefs...hmmm. > > My thoughts and prayers go out to those affected. Clearly most of the world > realizes this was an unspeakable act. When terrorist leaders condemn the > act, it's bad. > > > - Original Message - > From: "Puckett, Larry (TIFPC)" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 5:27 PM > Subject: RE: US Stock [7:19433] > > > > Funny how it's always "Pushing religion is unacceptable" but never ' > Pushing > > atheism is unacceptable' . > > -Original Message- > > From: Symon Thurlow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 4:15 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: US Stock [7:19433] > > > > pushing religion is pushing the limits of acceptable OT converstaion IMHO > > > > My deepest sympathy to those affected by this series of atrocities. A few > > weeks ago, a car bomb went off just up the road from my place (West > London), > > and I thought that was a wake up call the scale of this disaster is > just > > incomprehensible. > > > > Symon > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > > Craig Richardson > > Sent: 11 September 2001 21:08 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: US Stock [7:19433] > > > > > > I know this is off-topic and long, but I'll give it a shot anyway... > > > > Hello all, and much respect to everyone on this list. > > This is my first time writing to this list (as far as I can remember), > > although > > I have observed it for awhile. Most topics seem to be out of my Cisco > > range, > > but I do enjoy the information that crosses the list and I do respect > > everyone's > > opinion as their own. Terrible tragedies have been suffered today, and > many > > lives are now changed forever. As Priscilla mentioned, the damage to > > families > > is irreparable. However, to think that "if God existed, this incredible > > loss of life > > wouldn't have occurred in the first place", is to say that that the devil > > does not > > exist. God is very real and He does exist. Unfortunately, the devil is > > very real also, > > and he does exist. Many people think that the devil is a mythical figure > > that has > > nothing to do with current events, so they equate God with all of the good > > and the bad > > things. The fact is, that God does love us all, and it is not his desire > > that anyone of us > > should perish, but we all have an enemy, and that is the devil. Every > > opportunity he gets, > > he seeks to devour. God works through his people and He is patient. > > Tragedies do > > occur, but the blame should go t
RE: US Stock [7:19433]
Hitler was Catholic, and claims in "Mein Kampf" that "my conduct is in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator." -Original Message- From: Allen May [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 12:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: US Stock [7:19433] Wy off topic, but since the atheists got their say: Unbelievable the responses that came from this post. I agree. Amazing how many said not to push religion by pushing atheism right after you mentioned this. In a Christian society is is usually the atheists or Satanic cults that commit the most horrible crimes, not the Christians. (Timothy McVaugh, Hitler, most mass murderers of history, etc). It goes against everything Christians believe in to do such a thing. And, I believe the Holy War is about the only one I can think of in the name of their God. All others were over oil, land, expanding an empire, etc. Saying "May God be with us" during war doesn't make it for God. It's a plea by the soldiers forced into the conflict by government to save their souls when they are pushed into commiting acts of murder for their country/government. Christians have always had to fight for their right to practice due to others pushing their beliefs on them & trying to take their freedom of religion away. All the while, saying it's bad to push beliefs...hmmm. My thoughts and prayers go out to those affected. Clearly most of the world realizes this was an unspeakable act. When terrorist leaders condemn the act, it's bad. - Original Message - From: "Puckett, Larry (TIFPC)" To: Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 5:27 PM Subject: RE: US Stock [7:19433] > Funny how it's always "Pushing religion is unacceptable" but never ' Pushing > atheism is unacceptable' . > -Original Message- > From: Symon Thurlow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 4:15 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: US Stock [7:19433] > > pushing religion is pushing the limits of acceptable OT converstaion IMHO > > My deepest sympathy to those affected by this series of atrocities. A few > weeks ago, a car bomb went off just up the road from my place (West London), > and I thought that was a wake up call the scale of this disaster is just > incomprehensible. > > Symon > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Craig Richardson > Sent: 11 September 2001 21:08 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: US Stock [7:19433] > > > I know this is off-topic and long, but I'll give it a shot anyway... > > Hello all, and much respect to everyone on this list. > This is my first time writing to this list (as far as I can remember), > although > I have observed it for awhile. Most topics seem to be out of my Cisco > range, > but I do enjoy the information that crosses the list and I do respect > everyone's > opinion as their own. Terrible tragedies have been suffered today, and many > lives are now changed forever. As Priscilla mentioned, the damage to > families > is irreparable. However, to think that "if God existed, this incredible > loss of life > wouldn't have occurred in the first place", is to say that that the devil > does not > exist. God is very real and He does exist. Unfortunately, the devil is > very real also, > and he does exist. Many people think that the devil is a mythical figure > that has > nothing to do with current events, so they equate God with all of the good > and the bad > things. The fact is, that God does love us all, and it is not his desire > that anyone of us > should perish, but we all have an enemy, and that is the devil. Every > opportunity he gets, > he seeks to devour. God works through his people and He is patient. > Tragedies do > occur, but the blame should go to the devil, not God. When we pray, our > prayers do make > a difference as God hears our prayers. The "we" that I'm talking about is > those that believe > on His son, Jesus Christ. There is a spiritual war going on that must not > be overlooked. > Todays events are part of this war. The bible says it all. These are the > "end times" that we > are in. It is my hope that these tragedies will lead the rest of us to > realize that we do need a > saviour, and He is Jesus Christ. Please check Romans 14:10, 12/Ephesians > 2:8,9/ > Romans 3:23/Romans 6:23/ and Romans 10:9,10. Also, the book of Revelations > tells much > about the end times (which we've been in for quite some time). Prayer, > along with using all > available opportunities to help (like donating blood), goes a long way. > Thank you. > > Craig. > > - Original Message - > From: B.J. Wilson > To: > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 2:27 PM > Subject: Re: US Stock [7:19433] > > > > Well, since we're off-topic anyway...maybe if God existed, this incredible > > loss of life wouldn't have occurred in the first place. Part of > rebuilding > > our society involves rebuilding o
RE: Apology RE: US Stock [7:19433]
Unfortunately, I can't offer the same apology that John does. My response was meant to (and did) indicate that blaming this tragedy on "sin in the world" is almost worse than diminishing its magnitude through impudence. Indeed, put yourself or your child or your spouse on that plane or in one of those buildings, and tell them that there is an all-powerful and all-loving God that could stop this, but didn't. Talk about adding insult to injury. And now back to our regularly scheduled mail list. -Original Message- From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 11:53 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Apology RE: US Stock [7:19433] If you've perceived my comments that way then I apologize wholeheartedly. I was in *no way* trying to make light of these recent events and it actually bothers me that you'd think that. However, I can easily understand how you might think that so--again--I apologize. In a strange way, I was attempting to get the types of posts on the list a little more on-topic. I feel that posts regarding this attack are fine since they greatly affect us all on a number of levels. However, I didn't feel it was appropriate to start a religious discussion on the list. My attempt at humor was an absurd way to demonstrate that a discussion of God, sin, and consequences of sin on a list such as this would be fruitless, pointless, and most likely inflammatory considering the diverse makeup of the list. Perhaps because religious discussions are one of my "hot buttons" I wasn't able to restrain myself from making such an absurd post, but please do not take it in the wrong way. I agree that this list is made up of quite a few professionals and it's precisely that that makes religious discussion inappropriate. However, in hindsight I regret posting that publicly and I'll try to show more restraint in the future. Sincerely, John >>> NP-BASS LEON 9/12/01 9:15:30 AM >>> I've noticed all the comments being made, but please take five seconds and place your wife or your child in one of those planes or buildings, and I assure you your comments and thoughts would not be the same. I work a block from the Pentagon and I find NO amusement in your comments. Could it be because it didn't directly effect you or your family. I almost a very close friend and I didn't think that was amusing at all, when I did find her, she was covered with smoke and ash, but at least she was alive. I consider this page one of highly intelligent professionals, lets keep it that way. -Original Message- From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 10:45 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: US Stock [7:19433] Man, that's going to haunt you forever. I stole some gum from a store when I was nine and the world hasn't been the same since! >>> "Wilson, Bradley" 9/12/01 8:20:01 AM >>> Damn, I *knew* I shouldn't have stolen that Matchbox car from the toy store when I was five. Sorry people of NYC...my bad. -Original Message- From: Robert Perez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 9:49 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: US Stock [7:19433] Well, since you guys bring it up, coming from this net engineer who is a christian evangelist as well God is real and these instances happen because of sin in the world! You cannot expect to live in a society where sin and rebellion abounds so much and not expect some drastic consequences... But what a great loss especially to all the little children who lost mommies and daddies!!! To all those lost our hearts and prayers go out to them!! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19623&t=19433 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: US Stock [7:19433]
Damn, I *knew* I shouldn't have stolen that Matchbox car from the toy store when I was five. Sorry people of NYC...my bad. -Original Message- From: Robert Perez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 9:49 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: US Stock [7:19433] Well, since you guys bring it up, coming from this net engineer who is a christian evangelist as well God is real and these instances happen because of sin in the world! You cannot expect to live in a society where sin and rebellion abounds so much and not expect some drastic consequences... But what a great loss especially to all the little children who lost mommies and daddies!!! To all those lost our hearts and prayers go out to them!! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19574&t=19433 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCBOOTCAMP lab question [7:19175]
Why not just do them anyway? :-) -Original Message- From: Arun Upadhyay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 12:40 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCBOOTCAMP lab question [7:19175] Hi Group I have subscribe ccbootcamp practice labs for for my CCIE lab preparation. But their labs still has VINES, DECNET, APPLETALK, ATM LANE...Which are not part of CCIE lab any more. Can somebody suggest me who did or doing these labs that how should I attemp those particular labs which has these topics for configuration. Thanks. Arun __ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19253&t=19175 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Interesting NAT/PAT scenario [7:18418]
Here's a puzzler for you: "Their" 192.168.10.0/24 Network | "Their" Default gateway | "Their" VPN 3030 Concentrator running PAT w/ external interface 2.2.2.2 (Reference Point A) | Another default gateway leading to... | The Internet | "My" gateway router | "My" VPN box | "My" internal router possibly running NAT (Reference Point B) | "My" 172.16.0.0/14 network The VPN boxes are up and running and have a tunnel established. Okay, so at Ref. Point A, we're running PAT on the VPN box to hide the 192.168.10/24 network. Fine and dandy. For some reason, management has said that all source addresses coming into "my" network must be 172-based addresses rather than the 2.2.2.2 address. So they want to know if at Ref. Point B if I can run another NAT session which translates the 2.2.2.2:Port addresses into 172.16.0.0/14 addresses. I would think this wouldn't be possible, because I know of no NAT command which allows you to specify the outside local addresses as being PATted addresses. Is there such a command? Thanks. BJ P.S. Someday, "their" 192.168.10/24 network will be renumbered. This is just an interim configuration. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=18418&t=18418 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: one day lab will send ccie to the hell [7:18373]
Billy goat, billy goat, get off my root bridge... -Original Message- From: Dennis H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 8:54 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: one day lab will send ccie to the hell [7:18373] Please don't feed the troll ""tu tu"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > ccie will be useless, take juniper cert. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=18406&t=18373 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: True story about console port access problem [7:17860]
Danny Vermin (Joe Piscopo) was Johnny Dangerously's enemy. Roman Moroni was Jocko Dundee's enemy. Can you tell I've seen this film too many times? ;-) -Original Message- From: Ole Drews Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 10:03 AM To: 'Wilson, Bradley'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: True story about console port access problem [7:17860] Okay, so who's Danny Vermin? Ole ~~~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ http://www.RouterChief.com ~~~ NEED A JOB ??? http://www.oledrews.com/job ~~~ -----Original Message- From: Wilson, Bradley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 9:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: True story about console port access problem [7:17860] Oh no, that was Roman Moroni, who got deported to Sweden although he claimed he wasn't from there. Fargin sneaky bastages. -Original Message- From: Ole Drews Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 9:34 AM To: 'Wilson, Bradley' Subject: RE: True story about console port access problem [7:17860] Is that the same guy who said "You fargin eishole" ? Ole ~~~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ http://www.RouterChief.com ~~~ NEED A JOB ??? http://www.oledrews.com/job ~~~~~~~ -Original Message- From: Wilson, Bradley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 8:37 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: True story about console port access problem [7:17860] To paraphrase Danny Vermin... "I had that same problem once. ONCE." ;-) -Original Message- From: Ole Drews Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 9:19 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: True story about console port access problem [7:17860] Let me tell you a little story this rainy Thursday morning in Texas. I thought I had seen most problems with console port access - the flow control that is set to hardware instead of none, the cable being wrong, etc. But, I was wrong! I was trying to get access to a 2924, but could only see output. It would not react to anything I typed. I was using the standard Hyper Terminal that comes with NT. Okay, my first thought was that the PC I was using was just weird (which it is btw), so I tried a different PC - same problem. Then I tried another cable - same problem. Then I tried another cable with another terminal adapter (rj45 to db9) - same problem. Then I tried another cisco device that I had telnet access to also - same problem. Then I telnettet into the cisco device to verify the 9600/N/8/1 - no problem. Then I tried a cisco device that I just pulled out of the box, so I was sure that there was no restrictions or anything on it - same problem. After an hour of playing around with cables, adapters, settings and all, I happened to look at the keyboard, and I noticed that Scroll Lock was on. The keyboard is connected to a keyboard/mouse/monitor switch where you get the menu by clicking the scroll lock. After I turned scroll lock off, everything worked just fine. The reason for this e-mail is to save you guys out there time, and prevent you from start throwing around with the equipment because of frustration. Simply check the scroll lock, and you have found or ruled out one cause. Hope you found this a good little lesson to add in your trouble shooting book. Have a great day, Ole ~~~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ http://www.RouterChief.com ~~~ NEED A JOB ??? http://www.oledrews.com/job ~~~ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=17873&t=17860 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: True story about console port access problem [7:17860]
Oh no, that was Roman Moroni, who got deported to Sweden although he claimed he wasn't from there. Fargin sneaky bastages. -Original Message- From: Ole Drews Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 9:34 AM To: 'Wilson, Bradley' Subject: RE: True story about console port access problem [7:17860] Is that the same guy who said "You fargin eishole" ? Ole ~~~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ http://www.RouterChief.com ~~~ NEED A JOB ??? http://www.oledrews.com/job ~~~ -Original Message----- From: Wilson, Bradley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 8:37 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: True story about console port access problem [7:17860] To paraphrase Danny Vermin... "I had that same problem once. ONCE." ;-) -Original Message- From: Ole Drews Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 9:19 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: True story about console port access problem [7:17860] Let me tell you a little story this rainy Thursday morning in Texas. I thought I had seen most problems with console port access - the flow control that is set to hardware instead of none, the cable being wrong, etc. But, I was wrong! I was trying to get access to a 2924, but could only see output. It would not react to anything I typed. I was using the standard Hyper Terminal that comes with NT. Okay, my first thought was that the PC I was using was just weird (which it is btw), so I tried a different PC - same problem. Then I tried another cable - same problem. Then I tried another cable with another terminal adapter (rj45 to db9) - same problem. Then I tried another cisco device that I had telnet access to also - same problem. Then I telnettet into the cisco device to verify the 9600/N/8/1 - no problem. Then I tried a cisco device that I just pulled out of the box, so I was sure that there was no restrictions or anything on it - same problem. After an hour of playing around with cables, adapters, settings and all, I happened to look at the keyboard, and I noticed that Scroll Lock was on. The keyboard is connected to a keyboard/mouse/monitor switch where you get the menu by clicking the scroll lock. After I turned scroll lock off, everything worked just fine. The reason for this e-mail is to save you guys out there time, and prevent you from start throwing around with the equipment because of frustration. Simply check the scroll lock, and you have found or ruled out one cause. Hope you found this a good little lesson to add in your trouble shooting book. Have a great day, Ole ~~~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ http://www.RouterChief.com ~~~ NEED A JOB ??? http://www.oledrews.com/job ~~~ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=17867&t=17860 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: VIP [7:17775]
The term "VIP" is also used on the Content Server Switch. It's one of those context things - if you're talking hardware, it's a Versatile Interface Processor. If you're talking addressing, it's Virtual IP Address. -Original Message- From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 9:37 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: VIP [7:17775] In my experience VIP has always been, in Cisco parlance, Versitile Interface Processor, virtual ip most likely is refering to an HSRP address. Dave "Hyde, Lori" wrote: > Hi All, > I've seen this acromym described as a "Versatile Interface Processor" and > as a "Virtual IP". What is it "really"? > And when and where is it used? > > Thanks!! > Lori -- David Madland CCIE# 2016 Senior Network Engineer Qwest Communications 612-664-3367 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=17865&t=17775 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: True story about console port access problem [7:17860]
To paraphrase Danny Vermin... "I had that same problem once. ONCE." ;-) -Original Message- From: Ole Drews Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 9:19 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: True story about console port access problem [7:17860] Let me tell you a little story this rainy Thursday morning in Texas. I thought I had seen most problems with console port access - the flow control that is set to hardware instead of none, the cable being wrong, etc. But, I was wrong! I was trying to get access to a 2924, but could only see output. It would not react to anything I typed. I was using the standard Hyper Terminal that comes with NT. Okay, my first thought was that the PC I was using was just weird (which it is btw), so I tried a different PC - same problem. Then I tried another cable - same problem. Then I tried another cable with another terminal adapter (rj45 to db9) - same problem. Then I tried another cisco device that I had telnet access to also - same problem. Then I telnettet into the cisco device to verify the 9600/N/8/1 - no problem. Then I tried a cisco device that I just pulled out of the box, so I was sure that there was no restrictions or anything on it - same problem. After an hour of playing around with cables, adapters, settings and all, I happened to look at the keyboard, and I noticed that Scroll Lock was on. The keyboard is connected to a keyboard/mouse/monitor switch where you get the menu by clicking the scroll lock. After I turned scroll lock off, everything worked just fine. The reason for this e-mail is to save you guys out there time, and prevent you from start throwing around with the equipment because of frustration. Simply check the scroll lock, and you have found or ruled out one cause. Hope you found this a good little lesson to add in your trouble shooting book. Have a great day, Ole ~~~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ http://www.RouterChief.com ~~~ NEED A JOB ??? http://www.oledrews.com/job ~~~ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=17861&t=17860 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Work-related ACL problem [7:17695]
Okay gang, this one's work-related so don't feel obligated to help. ;-) I think it's an interesting thought problem though: The Problem I'm Trying To Solve: allow access to a particular website (2.2.2.2) from users on a particular subnet. Do NOT allow them to access any *other* website. Allow them to access other resources within your internal network (172.0.0.0). Here's the ACL I came up with: access-list 101 permit ip any host 167.216.138.4 access-list 101 deny tcp any eq www any access-list 101 permit ip any 172.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 access-list 101 permit ip any any This list was created on an MSFC card running in a 6509 chassis, and has been applied to interface Vlan1 inbound (I tried outbound as well just for kicks). The (unintended) result is that users can access both the target website, as well as other websites on the Internet. Any ideas? Bradley J. Wilson CCNP CCDP MCSE NNCSS CNX MCT CTT EDS/Boston Scientific Account (508) 650-8739 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=17695&t=17695 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: rommon [7:17244]
This is reminding me of that song "James K. Polk" by They Might Be Giants...it's basically a history lesson on the election of 1844. Anyone else interested in forming a band with me? All our songs can be lessons from the CCIE lab blueprint. ;-) -Original Message- From: Howard C. Berkowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2001 6:36 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: rommon [7:17244] >Wow howard, I didn't know you had an artistic side >to you :). now can you do us something in Haiku? >I'd really like to see that :) > >Brian Weathering storms in the lab Proctor is a black cloud My CCIE now is but a dream Initializing routers compete All priority 1 Only the fastest is DR The seven layered mountain majestic Still does not describe all Cherry blossoms bloom with other models Multihomed to two ISPs Inbound and outbound preferences Very different attributes > > >On Sat, 25 Aug 2001, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote: > >> This was the noblest rommon of them all, >> All the configurators, save only it, >> Did that they did in envy of great Cisco >> He only, in a general-honest thought >> And common good to all, made erase of them. >> His life had parity, and the elements >> So mix'd in him that IOS might stand up > > And say to all the world, "This was a boot!" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=17271&t=17244 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: THEY ARE NOT PORTS THEY ARE INTERFACES! [7:16843]
Here's how I like to deal with questions like this: Will knowing the answer ever help you troubleshoot a problem? "Oh, geez, I know what I've been doing wrong - I've been calling it a *port* when it's really an *interface*!! I'll have it up in a few seconds, sorry about that" ;-) -Original Message- From: Peter Van Oene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 2:56 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: THEY ARE NOT PORTS THEY ARE INTERFACES! [7:16843] What would you consider interface s0.100 to be? Seems pretty logical to me. I think you'll find that both the terms interface and port have context sensitive meanings. If you've ever configured a 3Com netbuilder you'll be even more convinced of this. I missed the rest of the thread, but I don't see how using a term one way or another makes one a dork even though I believe strongly in technical accuracy. Nor do I see how inferring that people are spineless dorks contributes positively to the learning process. Pete *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 8/22/2001 at 1:08 PM Peter Slow wrote: >an INTERFACE a thing, such as an ethernet or loopback interface. >a port is a logical device, and NO a loopback does not count. >i meant like tcp ports, usp ports, and the like. > >Stop being d0rks and copying everyone else who does it >wrong, and dont be afraid to tell people to speak correctly! > >c3660#conf t >Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z. >c3660(config)#port fastethernet 0/0 >^ >% Invalid input detected at '^' marker. > >c3660(config)#interface fastethernet 0/0 >c3660(config-if)#^Z >c3660#SEE!? >% Unrecognized command >c3660#SEE! >-humboldt Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=16872&t=16843 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Best Materials For CCIE Written and Lab Exams [7:16196]
I love the Lab Practice Kit - the price-per-lab ratio is low, and it's a great stepping stone towards the larger lab collections (ccbootcamp, etc.). There are a lot of mistakes, but it's kind of fun to figure out what they're *really* trying to say. There are also a few oddities - in the solutions, the authors left the "no ip classless" command in place. They did their labs with IOS 11.2, and no ip classless is the default, but there's no explanation as to why you would or why you would not leave that command in place - something to work out in your practice lab! BJ -Original Message- From: George Murphy CCNP, CCDP [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 12:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Best Materials For CCIE Written and Lab Exams [7:16196] Hi Folks, I am seeking advice on materials for the CCIE written and lab exams. I have been considering the McGraw Hill "All-In-One" CCIE study guide as well as their CCIE "Lab Practice Kit". I have been watching the published dates of these and considering that as a factor but would appreciate any suggestions or feedback from anyone who has found any of the resources available out there to be the best (CCPrep, Boson etc, etc). I have also read reviews on each one but value responses from this list more. Thanks for any assistance. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=16199&t=16196 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OSPF Distance Vector in the backbone? [7:16120]
The question that's on my mind is where you have an area which has multiple ABRs. Do the internal routers simply compare the metrics to the respective ABRs and make their routing decision based on that comparison? BJ -Original Message- From: Howard C. Berkowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 9:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: OSPF Distance Vector in the backbone? [7:16120] While I agree completely with Peter's statements, I think there may be two issues being mingled. Area 0.0.0.0, especially when there are no backbone-only routers, uses a DV-like algorithm to propagate inter-area and exterior routes. There's no use for a Dijkstra. Inside a nonzero area, the Dijkstra algorithm only computes intra-area routes, with a computational workload on the order of the square of the number of routes plus the logarithm of the number of routers. Inter-area and external routes are added to the routing table of that area as a second step, the workload for which is linear with the number of non-intra-area routes. At 08:55 AM 8/15/2001 -0400, you wrote: >Hey Ralph, > >This statement is quite true. Is there an area you wish to break down more >fully? > >For support, see the draft-ietf-ospf-abr-alt-04.txt which includes the >following text: > >In OSPF domains the area topology is restricted so that there must be >a backbone area (area 0) and all other areas must have either >physical or virtual connections to the backbone. The reason for this >star-like topology is that OSPF inter-area routing uses the >distance-vector approach and a strict area hierarchy permits >avoidance of the "counting to infinity" problem. OSPF prevents >inter-area routing loops by implementing a split-horizon mechanism, >allowing ABRs to inject into the backbone only Summary-LSAs derived >from the intra-area routes, and limiting ABRs' SPF calculation to >consider only Summary-LSAs in the backbone area's link-state >database. > > >*** REPLY SEPARATOR *** > >On 8/15/2001 at 12:12 AM Ralph Fudamak wrote: > > >Question about OSPF and LSA type 3 behavior. Doyle in Routing TCP/IP vol > >1: > > > >"When another router receives a Network Summary LSA from an ABR, it > >does > >not run the SPF algorithm. Rather it simply adds the cost of the route to > >the ABR and the cost included in the LSA. A route to the advertised > >destination, via the ABR, is entered into the route table along with the > >calculated cost. This behavior - depending on an intermediate router > >instead of determining the full route to the destination - is distance > >vector behavior. So, while OSPF is a link state protocol within an area, > >it > >uses a distance vector algorithm to find inter-area routes." (pg 474,475) > > > >Please enlighten me. > > > >TIA, > >Ralph Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=16185&t=16120 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: css (arrowpoint products) [7:16153]
The closest command I could find is "show chassis slot ," but that only gives you the base MAC address for the entire box. BJ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 7:29 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: css (arrowpoint products) [7:16153] hi. i need help about css products. is there a command that shows mac address of any interface on css? thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=16162&t=16153 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ccna question [7:15958]
Probably will contain as much technobabble as that *other* Next Generation... ;-) -Original Message- From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 2:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: ccna question [7:15958] I can hardly wait to see the next generation of test questions ;-> -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Priscilla Oppenheimer Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 9:54 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: ccna question [7:15958] 70/30? Who made that one up!?! ;-) There's no exact number of course, but folk wisdom was always 80/20. 80% of traffic stays local and 20% goes to a different part of the network. This really got blown out of the water in the last 4-5 years because of Intranets with corporate servers located centrally in server farms, a huge amount of traffic heading out the door to the Internet, VPN and remote-access traffic flowing back in the other way, a lot of AppleTalk and Novell departmental servers being outlawed, etc. Some people have gone so far as to say the equation has switched. 20% is local now and 80% is non-local. You would have to check traffic flows and volume on your own network for a number you could really use. I have never seen 70/30. Is that really what Cisco expects you to learn now? And which do they say is local and which is non-local? Priscilla At 12:42 AM 8/14/01, you wrote: >is that 80 local 20 non-local? with Cisco revising the number to 70 local >and 30 non-local? > >I refer to Priscilla Oppenheimer's Top Down Network Design ( don't argue >design without it :-> ) pp 20-21, the CID book written by Robert Padjen, pp >26-27, and Howard Berkowitz's Designing routing and Switching Architecture > wow! ), pages 35 and 575. > >Yes by all means learn the Cisco answer for the tests. Just remember that >Cisco tests in certain respects are not particularly reflective of the real >world, as at least three eminent real world experts indicate. > >Chuck > > > >-Original Message- >From: Albert Y. Pak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 9:03 PM >To: Chuck Larrieu; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: ccna question [7:15958] > > >The current theory is 80/20. However, to pass CCNA exam, the answer is >70/30. ;-) >HTH >Albert > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >Chuck Larrieu >Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 11:31 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: ccna question [7:15958] > > >much as I hate to pass this one, because every response will hit the >moderator's queue (x is a forbidden word), I thought this an honest >question and that you were entitled to an answer. > >80/20 or 70/30 what? > >are you referring to the old "80 percent of your LAN traffic should be >local, and 20 percent should be non-local" rule of good design? > >I haven't seen the recent Cisco study materials, but from other reading, I >believe that current theory is that you can't go by this rule any longer. >Internet access, shared services, centralized server farms, intranets, all >have kinda blown all this local traffic versus non-local traffic percentages >by the wayside. > >to transform a phrase of Brian Eno's - the one Scott McNealy probably stole. >I know I sure did - the world is now the LAN. > >Chuck > >Eno: the recording studio is my synthesizer ( circa 1980 ) >McNealy: the network is the computer ( circa 1996 ) >Me: the telco network is the central office ( circa 1990 ) > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >Manjunath Shivaramaiah >Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 7:46 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: ccna question [7:15958] > > >hi >i have a doubt regarding lan design in ciscoIt is 80/20 or70/30 ..in >x and 604-407 books it says it is 70/30...pl help me in this >regard... >I'm taking ccna exam shortly > >thanks > >manjunath.s Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=16064&t=15958 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Static routes [7:15851]
Sure, except that you might defeat the purpose of having a loopback address by doing this. Say you've got a scenario where you have two routers connected by three separate connections: /-\ O---O \_/ If you specify the next hop of the loopback to be just *one* of the interfaces on the other router, then the loopback will be inaccessable if that one interface on the other router goes down. If you're using static routes, be sure to include all the different paths you can take to get to the other router - which may be complex enough to warrant just going to RIP or OSPF. ;-) BJ -Original Message- From: Hawthorne, Mike MM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 8:09 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Static routes [7:15851] Can anyone tell me if you are able to use a loopback address in a static route. For example ip route x.x.x.x y.y.y.y 196.8.87.17 x.x.x.x y.y.y.y being the loopback address. Thanks Mike Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=15852&t=15851 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Limiting Bandwidth per switch port? [7:15606]
Hey folks - Is it possible to reduce the amount of available bandwidth on a Catalyst (6509) switch port? I found a link on CCO which talks about "traffic policing," but it only shows how to configure it using some GUI, and I have a feeling it's not what I'm looking for. Before anyone asks WPAYTTS: We've got a couple of hubs which we're going to convert to VLANs on a 6509. There are proxy servers on these hubs, but they're sort of old and are due to be upgraded eventually. Since they're used to having less-than-10Mb connections, we don't want to "shock" them by suddenly moving them to 10Mb ports on the 6509. So I'd like to reduce the amount of throughput on just those ports that the proxies plug into. Once the proxies have been upgraded, we'll let them run at the normal 10Mb. Any suggestions? Thanks in advance. BJ Bradley J. Wilson CCNP CCDP MCSE NNCSS CNX MCT CTT EDS/Boston Scientific Account (508) 650-8739 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=15606&t=15606 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE written study question [7:15514]
> 3. Read the Doyle Episode 1 "Episode 1"? LOL... Yeah, I thought it was pretty sub-par compared to Eps. 4, 5 and 6. And I *really* wanted to kill that annoying IS-IS Binks character... ;-) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=15594&t=15514 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: binary [7:15544]
Priscilla brings up an important point - it doesn't really make a difference which method you use - as long as you get the right answer, and aren't dependent on any external devices! BJ I do use decimal. ;-) Just like someone else said, I do make a list such as: 128, 192, 224, 240, 248, 252, 254, 255. I don't get the tricks I've seen people do where they subtract from 256 (or something like that. Since I don't get them, I can't remember them!) Priscilla Bradley J. Wilson CCNP CCDP MCSE NNCSS CNX MCT CTT EDS/Boston Scientific Account (508) 650-8739 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=15544&t=15544 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BGP Filtering [7:15450]
(i.e. What problem are you trying to solve? Why would you want to limit the number of prefixes you receive? Do you want to limit them to the first 500 it receives, or a *specific* set of prefixes?) BJ -Original Message- From: Saleem Nathoo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 7:58 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: BGP Filtering [7:15450] I wanted to know the bgp commands to allow only a minimum 100 and maximum 500 routes in the routing table from my EBGP neighbor. Not using prefix lists or access lists. These routes that are coming into my topology are from different networks and subnets. Thanks in advance. Thanks, Saleem Nathoo Network Administrator Marketguide a division of Multex.com, Inc. www.marketguide.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=15534&t=15450 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Bay Password Recovery? [7:15480]
Unfortunately, Bay has made password recovery extremely difficult for their low-end routers. You'll need to contact the Bay TAC and get a certain executable from them, and then boot your router with it instead of its usual image. You can then go in, change (or delete) your password, then re-boot again with the right image. -Original Message- From: Ngo Van Dzung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 12:04 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Password Recovery? [7:15425] Hi All, Someone know how to do password recovery for Bay ARN (Advance Remote Node) Router? Please help me. Cheeres, Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=15480&t=15480 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MCSE need help [7:15235]
Hey, wait...wasn't that the Unabomber's technique?? ;-) -Original Message- From: Dennis Bailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 10:17 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: MCSE need help [7:15235] Oh my god! Not fatal error 1925! Place the computer in a box and send it to: Bill Gates Redmond WA ""parky chan"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Dear all > My office applicate is Easy Clear but when i use this > function to print out > document , > it prompt > "OLE error code 0x80040154 class not registered OLE object is being > ignored Record > number :4 " > > then prompt fatal error " Error number is 1925 " > How to solve this problem Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=15481&t=15235 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: What to buy for CCIE written Poll [7:15318]
Careful what you wish for... ;-) -Original Message- From: Wright, Jeremy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 5:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: What to buy for CCIE written Poll [7:15318] Hell, I would trade my girlfriend in for some ATM, ISDN, and Voice equipment -Original Message- From: Donald B Johnson jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 4:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: What to buy for CCIE written Poll [7:15318] I would buy both just to wear down the wife. Wait till you have to put some ATM, ISDN or Voice in your life. That is when you need the fancy dance. - Original Message - From: "Bolton, Travis" To: Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 10:17 AM Subject: What to buy for CCIE written Poll [7:15318] > Team, > > If you had a choice between getting a 6 month subscription to > Certificationzone.com or buying all three of the Boson Exams which would you > do if you had to choose one? I'll have to try to convince the boss (wife) > one or the other to purchase :-) Thanks. > > Regards, > > Travis Bolton > Network Engineer II > CCNP [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=15482&t=15318 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Why Should the Binary Math Method Be Used to Subnet [7:15314]
Are you allowed to take a subnet calculator into *any* certification test? If your network is crashing and (for some reason) you need to do some quick binary math to solve the problem, do you really have time to wait to run back to your desk and launch (or perhaps even download first) a subnet calculator program? Will subnet calculators know enough to ask the questions that you don't know to ask regarding a given situation? In my opinion, the only calculator one should depend on for everyday binary math problems in networking should be the one located between one's ears. With a little bit of practice, it's dependable, reliable, and takes an amazingly short time to boot up. ;-) BJ -Original Message- From: Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 12:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Why Should the Binary Math Method Be Used to Subnet [7:15306] This is a study group so I have a question for which I need some education. I am not looking for a flame war, just education. The question I have is of what use is the binary math method of subnetting as compared to just using a program that does subnetting? If the point to the exercise is to produce a plan for subnetting that can then be entered into each device on the network or into a DHCP server setup, what else is achieved by doing this manually? It seems to me that the point is not the journey, but the arrival at the destination. Indeed arrival as quickly as possible, with the least source of error. As Cisco even says; "The purpose of this tool is to provide a way to calculate IP subnetting which is fast, easy, and error free. Doing such calculations manually is time consuming and susceptible to common mathematical mistakes, especially in conversions between binary and decimal numbers." So what is it I am not understanding? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=15314&t=15314 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cat 6.5K error messages [7:15257]
Okay, I see where you're coming from. Are the switch port and server NIC hard-coded at a certain speed and duplex? -Original Message- From: Patrick Donlon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 8:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Cat 6.5K error messages [7:15250] It's a server in the port, and the messages are occurring fairly frequently in succession. I can see other devices joining and leaving occasionally, I thought this interface may be flapping, cheers ""Wilson, Bradley"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I thought these messages appeared whenever a station joins or leaves the > switch - are you sure someone isn't just rebooting their PC? > > > -Original Message- > From: Patrick Donlon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 7:33 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Cat 6.5K error messages [7:15241] > > > I have a cat' that is giving me these messages on the console: > > 06:02:18 MET +02:00 %PAGP-5-PORTFROMSTP:Port 8/48 left bridge port 8/48 > > 06:02:35 MET +02:00 %PAGP-5-PORTTOSTP:Port 8/48 joined bridge port 8/48. > > From the CCO I've read that it could be a duplex mis-match, faulty NIC, > cable or mis-configuration. > How can I find out from the switch stat's which is most likely? > > cheers Pat Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=15257&t=15257 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Dedicated T1 to Japan [7:15256]
Agreed. I have no problem with questions like this. Being a good engineer has a lot to do with things which are *not* on the CCIE Lab checklist, and it never hurts to color outside the lines now and then. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 8:29 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Dedicated T1 to Japan [7:15253] lighten up Andrew Lennon wrote: > @!#$ OFF > > This has sod all to do with passing the CCIE exam! > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > Kenny Sallee > Sent: 08 August 2001 00:03 > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: Dedicated T1 to Japan > > Does anyone here know the approximate cost of a dedicated T1 from the > west > coast to Japan. Doesn't need to be exact I just need rough numbers. I > apologize for being off subject. > **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html > _ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=15256&t=15256 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cat 6.5K error messages [7:15250]
I thought these messages appeared whenever a station joins or leaves the switch - are you sure someone isn't just rebooting their PC? -Original Message- From: Patrick Donlon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 7:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cat 6.5K error messages [7:15241] I have a cat' that is giving me these messages on the console: 06:02:18 MET +02:00 %PAGP-5-PORTFROMSTP:Port 8/48 left bridge port 8/48 06:02:35 MET +02:00 %PAGP-5-PORTTOSTP:Port 8/48 joined bridge port 8/48. >From the CCO I've read that it could be a duplex mis-match, faulty NIC, cable or mis-configuration. How can I find out from the switch stat's which is most likely? cheers Pat Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=15250&t=15250 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Access-list [7:14755]
Wouldn't you want to put the tcp/udp permits before the ip denys? access-list 101 permit udp host eq 53 any gt 1023 access-list 101 permit udp host eq 53 any gt 1023 access-list 101 permit tcp any eq www any established access-list 101 deny ip 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 any access-list 101 deny ip 172.16.0.0 0.15.255.255 any access-list 101 deny ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 any access-list 101 deny ip any Otherwise, I think the "deny ip any" would deny any higher-layer traffic from getting through. -Original Message- From: Kent Hundley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 1:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Access-list [7:14755] The most basic config is: access-list 101 deny ip 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 any access-list 101 deny ip 172.16.0.0 0.15.255.255 any access-list 101 deny ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 any access-list 101 deny ip any (these block bogus packets, you should always have these for Internet facing routers) access-list 101 permit udp host eq 53 any gt 1023 access-list 101 permit udp host eq 53 any gt 1023 access-list 101 permit tcp any eq www any established and then: interface serial 0 (or whatever is your Internet facing interface) ip access-group 101 in You'll need to permit additional things if you want your users to be able to ping and traceroute. There's also certain ICMP packets that you should probably allow in as well. You might also want to consider using the Firewall Feature Set (FFS) to get stateful inspection capability on the router. I would recommend looking at the security docs on the Cisco site or getting a good book on access-lists. I happen to think that "Cisco Access Lists Field Guide" is pretty good, but then I'm biased since I'm co-author. :-) HTH, Kent -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Thomas Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2001 11:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Access-list [7:14755] Hi All, On my internet router, I would like to deny everything but allow HTTP traffic to get to the outside world and return to the host inside the LAN. I really have difficulty with the access list. Could you please help me out. BTW, I am running PAT (port address translation) on this router. Thanks All in advance! Thomas Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=15041&t=14755 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OSPF Link State [7:15008]
Slight correction, if I may: it's not that OSPF will declare a link dead after it fails to receive four packets. It will declare the link dead after it has not received any hello packets for the duration of the configured dead timer. By default the dead timer on a broadcast medium is equal to four times the hello interval, so this would indeed work out to four packets. But you could set the dead timer to 11 seconds if you really wanted to, and OSPF would declare the link dead after 11 seconds had passed without hearing a hello packet. BJ ss wrote: Hi!! OSPF uses hello packets as keepalive message.This is exchanged periodically at regular intervals between the neighbors to check if the link is alive.Suppose if the link goes down then the neighbor will not receive hello packets which means there is some problem in the link.If the neighbor does not receive 4 consecutive hello packets at the intervals defined ,then the neighbor is considere dead. After sometime if the neighbor again comes up,the router has to again establish the neighbor relationship. Hope this helps you Cheers ss Bradley J. Wilson CCNP CCDP MCSE NNCSS CNX MCT CTT EDS/Boston Scientific Account (508) 650-8739 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=15008&t=15008 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
