Re: Cisco Vs. Low cost switches -Whats the Diff ? [7:74987]
Options like enhanced security, Enhanced QoS, protocol and technology support. neil Steven Aiello wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Ok, So I know there is a big difference in the cost and performance of Cisco (even lower end models) and let say a netgear switch. But where do the difference lay? I know that there are memory issues and back plain differences in these 2 classes of switches. But how do I find out what a lower cost switch will perform like. I was doing some bench marking on a NetGear 100Mb switch, between a large file transfer off a Win2k Server and a client. The through put was only a few Meg a best. The NIC in the server is a Gbit NIC and shouldn't be over whelmed by a simple file transfer. (I was running this while every one else was out of office so I know that's not an issue). I know that with Ethernet there is collisions and the like so I may not get true 100Mb performance but the results were horrible. What should I look for even in lower cost switches to be sure I get at least decent performance out of them? Even if you ramble on in this point, GREAT! The more you know the better I say. Thanks all, Steve **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74990t=74987 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
NM-1CT1 or WIC-1DSU-T1 [7:74741]
Can somebody explain when I can use WIC-1DSU-T1 over NM-1CT1 or what exactly are the difference except that WIC-1DSU-T1 has a built-in DSU/CSU where as NM-1CT1 is a T1 Module. Thanks in advance. neil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74741t=74741 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Catalyst 6500 Architecture [7:74460]
Folks, The Catalyst 6500 uses a Shared bus Architecture and to increase the Backplane capacity you have to have Switch fabric module (SFM) with fabric Enabled modules to make it work. Is there a vendor which has a better architecture or a better solution. Thanks, neil K. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74460t=74460 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Books for CCM and Unity [7:73358]
Folks, Any books you would recommend for Cisco CallMager and Unity and Cisco IP Telephony Design. Thanks, Sunil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73358t=73358 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com
Re: Ethernet Interface Collisions Incresing rapidly [7:71176]
The Cisco bridge operates in Half-duplex and that is why half-duplex. The Router is a Cisco 1751 with WIC-1ENET, which is connected to the Wireless Bridge. I checked with the output Interpreter on CCO and it said the collisions are more than 0.53 much higher than 0.1 normal rate. Here's the output of sh interfaces e 0/0 Ethernet0/0 is up, line protocol is up Hardware is PQUICC Ethernet, address is 0004.dd0d.5502 (bia 0004.dd0d.5502) Internet address is 172.20.1.2/24 MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1 Kbit, DLY 1000 usec, reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255 Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set Keepalive set (10 sec) Half-duplex, 10BaseT ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00 Last input 00:00:00, output 00:00:00, output hang never Last clearing of show interface counters 3d20h Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0 Queueing strategy: weighted fair Output queue: 0/1000/64/0 (size/max total/threshold/drops) Conversations 0/5/256 (active/max active/max total) Reserved Conversations 0/0 (allocated/max allocated) Available Bandwidth 7200 kilobits/sec 5 minute input rate 53000 bits/sec, 13 packets/sec 5 minute output rate 8000 bits/sec, 13 packets/sec 4528216 packets input, 642790340 bytes, 0 no buffer Received 176451 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles 0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored 0 input packets with dribble condition detected 6314935 packets output, 279254727 bytes, 0 underruns 59281 output errors, 86548 collisions, 0 interface resets 0 babbles, 0 late collision, 0 deferred 0 lost carrier, 0 no carrier 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out Thanks, neil Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Collisions go up normally with load. What is the load? Could something else (an attack or trojan horse or just excitement about your terrific content) have caused the load to go way up? Cisco says that no more than 0.1 percent of frames should experience collisions. How many frames have there been in the time that the collisions went up? How does that compare to your baseline? By the way, why do you have the interfaces set to half duplex? Why don't you set them them to full since it's a point-to-point link? Priscilla neil K wrote: One of my Cisco router's Ethernet interface connected to a Cisco Wireless Bridges has the interface collisions counter increasing rapidly. Over a period of 48 hrs the collision counter was 60,000 and the output error counter was more than 4. Both the Ethernet interface on the router and the Cisco Wireless bridge are set to 10/Half-duplex. There is nothing in between the bridge and the Router Ethernet, connected by a cross-over cable. What could be causing this. Any comments, neil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=71254t=71176 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ethernet Interface Collisions Incresing rapidl [7:71176]
The problem is that we are doing VoIP over the link using Cisco FXO and FXS ports and People are complaining about Voice breaking up, like a bad cell phone call. I heard it myself, it sounds good but sometimes breaks up.The routers are running g.729 and use the Wireless link. I have looked into the Configuration side on the Routers, and have done QoS as well on Routers, but still these issues. I did a MOS score calculation and it was 4.03 which is Acceptable which means that the call quality should be good, but, it is not. Then I checked the Ethernet Interface counters, and saw collisions increasing rapidly, and hence the question. Thanks, neil Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] neil K wrote: The Cisco bridge operates in Half-duplex and that is why half-duplex. The Router is a Cisco 1751 with WIC-1ENET, which is connected to the Wireless Bridge. I checked with the output Interpreter on CCO and it said the collisions are more than 0.53 much higher than 0.1 normal rate. That doesn't sound like a serious problem. Here's the output of sh interfaces e 0/0 Ethernet0/0 is up, line protocol is up Hardware is PQUICC Ethernet, address is 0004.dd0d.5502 (bia 0004.dd0d.5502) Internet address is 172.20.1.2/24 MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1 Kbit, DLY 1000 usec, reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255 Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set Keepalive set (10 sec) Half-duplex, 10BaseT ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00 Last input 00:00:00, output 00:00:00, output hang never Last clearing of show interface counters 3d20h Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0 Queueing strategy: weighted fair Output queue: 0/1000/64/0 (size/max total/threshold/drops) Conversations 0/5/256 (active/max active/max total) Reserved Conversations 0/0 (allocated/max allocated) Available Bandwidth 7200 kilobits/sec 5 minute input rate 53000 bits/sec, 13 packets/sec 5 minute output rate 8000 bits/sec, 13 packets/sec 4528216 packets input, 642790340 bytes, 0 no buffer Received 176451 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles 0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored 0 input packets with dribble condition detected 6314935 packets output, 279254727 bytes, 0 underruns 59281 output errors, 86548 collisions, 0 interface resets 86548 divided by 6314935 is about 1%. That's not a big deal. I know Cisco says that the threshold is 0.1%, but they just made that number up. There's no exact number where you have to be concerned, and most experts have said for years that Cisco's 0.1% is extremely low. They just want to sell you switches! :-) Collisions are a normal part of Ethernet's media access control method. They go up with load as 2 or more stations try to send simultaneously. You aren't seeing a high load now, but the load statistic is for the last five minutes. If you want to try to correlate load with collisions, you should clear the counters and keep an eye on the statistics. The nefarious 59281 output errors are curious. It's supposed to be a total of all the other output errors and I would think it would count the collisions, but Cisco isn't very clear about this. Why wouldn't they count all the collisions? Or maybe the output errors are different from the collisions, but I don't know what else they would be. Cisco just says that output errors are a cumulation of the other errors and that they may not add up to the others because a frame could have more than one error, which doesn't apply to your situation. 0 babbles, 0 late collision, 0 deferred 0 deferred is a good sign, as are all those other 0 error counts. I don't think you really have a problem. What gave you concern? I guess the collisions went up. But that would be normal if they went up at the same time as both ends of the interface were trying to send a lot of traffic. By the way, what does the other end say about errors? (i.e. the wireless bridge interface, can it show you some statistics?) What else did Cisco's Output Interpreter have to say about the statistics? Can you copy and paste its report? It could help us help you. Are users complaining? If not, I would say just to use the data you have gathered as baseline data, but not as data that causes any troubleshooting action. If users are complaining, then use the troubleshooting method called swap 'til you drop. Change the cable, the interfaces, etc. But my guess is that nothing is wrong. Your interface looks extremely healthy. Priscilla 0 lost carrier, 0 no carrier 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out Thanks, neil Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Collisions go up normally with load. What is the load? Could something else (an attack or trojan horse or just excitement
Ethernet Interface Collisions Incresing rapidly [7:71176]
One of my Cisco router's Ethernet interface connected to a Cisco Wireless Bridges has the interface collisions counter increasing rapidly. Over a period of 48 hrs the collision counter was 60,000 and the output error counter was more than 4. Both the Ethernet interface on the router and the Cisco Wireless bridge are set to 10/Half-duplex. There is nothing in between the bridge and the Router Ethernet, connected by a cross-over cable. What could be causing this. Any comments, neil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=71176t=71176 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Traffic generator for Testing QoS features [7:70864]
I want to test QoS features on a router, and am looking for a good traffic generator which can generate different kinds of traffic. Any recommendations? Thanks, neil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70864t=70864 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VPN and VoIP [7:70640]
Hi, Cisco IP phones can be used as remote extensions in which case you can have a Cisco IP phone at home and have the same extension as you have in the office. Can this be done with the following setup. DSL modem at home connected to a small switch. The home PC and the IP phone connect to the Switch which connects to the DSL modem. The PC has Cisco VPN client installed and can connect to the Head-office where the VPN concentrator is. Now for the IP Phone, how will it connect,. It will have a private IP address but , doesn't have a VPN client like the PC has. What is the solution for this type of application. Comments? thanks, neil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70640t=70640 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FXO cfg. [7:70403]
Guys, In a FXO gateway scenario can we use a destination-pattern of .T under the FXO port on the gateway which uses FXO ports to connect to Telco, so that we can call phone numbers less than 10 digits or more. THE configuration is like this Cisco 2600 (FXO) Cisco 2600 ( FXS) | | | | Telco PBX I have a Telco line coming into Cisco 2600 with FXO and want the dial tone at the other 2600 with FXS ports.I have seen the CCO documentation of the application but the problem is calling phone numbers which are less than 10 or more than 10 digits. Any comments, neil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70403t=70403 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.T destination pattern [7:70271]
Guys, In a FXO gateway scenario can we use a destination-pattern of .T under the FXO port on the gateway so that we can call phone numbers less than 10 digits or more. THE configuration is like this Cisco 2600 (FXO) Cisco 2600 ( FXS) | | | | Telco PBX I have a Telco line coming into Cisco 2600 with FXO and want the dial tone at the other 2600 with FXS ports.I have seen the CCO documentation of the application but the problem is calling phone numbers which are less than 10 or more than 10 digits. Any comments, neil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70271t=70271 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
LLQ on Ethernet subinterfaces [7:70020]
Can somebody tell me how to configure LLQ on Ethernet subinterfaces connected to two VLAN's. Will appreciate it. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70020t=70020 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FXO to FXS gateway ........... [7:67352]
Hi, I have two 1751 to configure for toll bypass purpose as shown below. R1with (FXS) .IP network.R2(With FXO) = PSTN I want the dial-tone of R2 PSTN at R1 location. I have configured the routers as follows but I can't do long distance. I have tried different dial-patterns, I want to be able to dial 10 digit and 11 digit numbers from the R1 location, the same way as I do in R2, meaning dial 1 for long distance and local code for local calling. Right now I can make and receive calls but I can dial just 10 digit numbers. Please help, Configurations : R2 hostname r2 interface Ethernet0/0 ip address 172.20.1.2 255.255.255.0 half-duplex ! interface FastEthernet0/0 ip address 192.168.100.2 255.255.255.0 speed auto ! ip classless no ip http server ip pim bidir-enable ! ! ! call rsvp-sync ! voice-port 2/0 timeouts call-disconnect 3 connection plar opx 4081234567 ! voice-port 2/1 connection plar opx 4081234567 ! dial-peer cor custom ! ! ! dial-peer voice 1 pots preference 1 destination-pattern .. port 2/0 ! dial-peer voice 100 voip destination-pattern 4081234567 session target ipv4:192.168.100.1 dtmf-relay h245-signal ip qos dscp ef media ! dial-peer voice 2 pots preference 2 destination-pattern .. port 2/1 ! - R1 cfg interface Ethernet0/0 ip address 172.20.1.254 255.255.255.0 half-duplex ! interface FastEthernet0/0 ip address 192.168.100.1 255.255.255.0 speed auto ! ip classless no ip http server ip pim bidir-enable ! ! ! call rsvp-sync ! voice-port 2/0 ! voice-port 2/1 ! dial-peer cor custom ! ! ! dial-peer voice 1 pots preference 1 destination-pattern 4081234567 port 2/0 ! dial-peer voice 100 voip destination-pattern .. session target ipv4:192.168.100.2 dtmf-relay h245-signal ip qos dscp ef media ! dial-peer voice 2 pots preference 2 destination-pattern 4081234567 port 2/1 ! alias exec c conf t alias exec sir sh ip route alias exec siib sh ip int brief alias exec sr sh runn alias exec svp sh voice po neil K Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=67352t=67352 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VPN CONCENTRATOR Parallel FW [7:66819]
Joseph, In this scenario all you had to do is specify the TUNNEL DEFAULT Gateway on the Concentrator, Is that right. Also In site to site VPN case, the remote site can get the DHCP addresses from the servers if we define helper address on the remote site VPN router...right ? Thanks, neil Joseph Brunner wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You need a router when running them parrallel. The router will determine internet traffic goes to the pix, remote vpn lan's etc go to the vpn 3000. Mine is like VPN 3000 PIX 10.0.0.210.0.0.10 10.0.0.0/24 10.0.0.1 RTR 192.168.0.1 SERVERS 192.168.0.0/24 This way no servers need route commands to know where to route what. And you guessed it, my vpn clients get addresses on the subnet between router and vpn (10.0.0.0/24) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=66852t=66819 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VPN CONCENTRATOR Parallel FW [7:66819]
All, I am planning to put a VPN concentrator parallel with a Firewall.The problem I am concerned about is the default gateway on the servers and other workstations. Since the concentrator is sitting parallel to the FW, The servers have a router which is on the same subnet as the Firewall inside interface and VPN Concentrator inside,defined as the default gateway. So for the servers to send the traffic back,I think we have to add a static route with the regular route command under windows.. Is that the only solution or the Tunnel Default Gateway option in the Concentrator will help to fix this issue. Any help will be highly appreciated. Thanks, Neil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=66819t=66819 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1720 crashing every week [7:66080]
Hi Folks, I got two 1720's connected with a two bri's. I am running PPP multilink on them, it is basic ISDN setup with PPP Multilink,Also I have set up a very high idle-timer on the dialer interface just to keep them up indefinitely, but the routers crash every week and I have to manually reset them and, then they work fine for a week.Any help will be highly appreciated. Thanks, neil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=66143t=66080 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1720 crashing every week [7:66080]
Hi Folks, I got two 1720's connected with a two bri's. I am running PPP multilink on them, it is basic ISDN setup with PPP Multilink,Also I have set up a very high idle-timer on the dialer interface just to keep them up indefinitely, but the routers crash every week and I have to manually reset them and, then they work fine for a week.Any help will be highly appreciated. Thanks, neil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=66080t=66080 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
can u summarize area 0 [7:63365]
Folks, Can area 0 be summarized in OSPF ? Thanks, Neil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63365t=63365 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PIM Sparse-dense-mode configuration [7:63146]
Folks, I am having problem configuring IP PIM SPARSE_DENSE MODE over a Frame Relay network.The network looks like R1(s0)--FR--(S1)R4(S0)--FR---(S0)R6(e0) igmp group join(224.4.4.4) R6 has two dlci's configured on physical interface one pointing to R4 and the Other to R2. I configured a static RP on R1, R4 and R6 with the loopback of R6 acting as RP.I can't ping the 224.4.4.4 address from R4 or from R1. Any suggestions. Highly appreciate any help. Neil. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63146t=63146 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BGP question. [7:62519]
Rajesh, Check the next hop for the BGP routes and see if it is reachable. If not you can use next-hop-self command to fix the issue or have IGP reach that next hop address. Hope this helps. Sunil Soporie Rajesh Kumar wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi all, I come across some situations where I could see some routes in the BGP table, but those routes aren't there in the regular routing table. The configuration has no sync configured and couldn't guess how to go about it. Can somebody help me out here? thanks, r Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=62522t=62519 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
difference between Connection trunk, Connection Tie-Line [7:62355]
Hi Folks, Can anyone please explain the difference between using Connection Trunk and Connection Tie-Line as applied to a FXO to FXS connection between two routers.Any good Cisco Links explaining the differences will be great. Thanks, Neil I. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=62355t=62355 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Connection Trunk, Tie-line [7:62291]
Hello Guys, 1) Could you please explain, when the connection type Trunk should be used, and when the connection type Tie-line. 2) Also what happens if I configure the connection Trunk for linking FXO and FXS on two routers. 3) The connection Trunk command has string parameter also, what is this number. I have seen this number corresponds to the phone number on the other side of the trunk, but what happens if I want to call many phone/extensions using the same FXO / FXS trunk configuration. I will appreciate your help. Thanks, neil K. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=62291t=62291 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NAT and VoIP [7:62053]
Anyone heard about having problems with NAT and running VoIP. I want run VoIP across a DSL link with NAT. Thanks in advance. neil K. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=62053t=62053 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCNP Recertification [7:62055]
Anybody passed CCNP recertification test recently. Any suggestions, what to look for and what books to refer. Thanks, neil K. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=62055t=62055 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PBX knowledge for VoIP [7:61958]
Hi Guys, Need your help. How much PBX knowledge / Voice networking knowledge is necessary to be a good VoIP Engineer. Any suggestions on books to go through or any web sites. Thanks, neil K. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=61958t=61958 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice Over Internet [7:61467]
Hi Guys, I have a few questions regarding implementing VoIP. 1) Can I have different remote offices run VoIP if they have (DSL access of Cable modem access) to the Internet, I mean running VoiP over internet as there wouldn't be any QoS.I am not sure about the Quality of Voice in that case.Also can the service provider of DSL or Cable provide us with some kind of QoS so that the Voice quality can be improved. 2)Will implementing a VPN solution help in running VoIP and how and what are the different solutions and what vendors should I be looking at. 3) Does Cisco have a solution for this. Thanks in advance. Neil. K. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=61467t=61467 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Voice Over Internet [7:61467]
Is it supported by Cisco and I am taking about connecting office's with 4 - 10 phones. Does yr Service Provider provide any kind of QoS. Thanks, Neil neil K. wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi Guys, I have a few questions regarding implementing VoIP. 1) Can I have different remote offices run VoIP if they have (DSL access of Cable modem access) to the Internet, I mean running VoiP over internet as there wouldn't be any QoS.I am not sure about the Quality of Voice in that case.Also can the service provider of DSL or Cable provide us with some kind of QoS so that the Voice quality can be improved. 2)Will implementing a VPN solution help in running VoIP and how and what are the different solutions and what vendors should I be looking at. 3) Does Cisco have a solution for this. Thanks in advance. Neil. K. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=61472t=61467 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Voice Over Internet [7:61467]
I have a couple of questions more. 1) The IP addressing. The Ip address is assigned dynamically by Service Provider and also the running NAT on the router, will it be an issue. 2) In that case VPN would be a better choice or not. Neil Bruce Enders wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Neil, In broad brushstrokes the answers are sort of: 1. Variable delay is the worst enemy of Voice QoS. Queuing delays are sometimes very common in ISP-to-ISP connections. Putting Voice traffic on the Internet is a risky proposition if you have significant concerns regarding Voice quality. Making sure that each remote has significant bandwidth for the VOIP traffic is the first step. ISPs may be capable of providing some levels of QoS, but may be reluctant to do so. Most ISPs have significantly less queuing delay within their network than they do across connections to other ISPs. (VOIP across the same ISP backbone usually results in better than acceptable voice quality). It is usually the links that connect different ISPs that create the most problems. I have seen large VOIP implementations that achieved very good voice quality over a very large geographic area that was all served by one ISP. (Choose your ISP wisely). 2. VPN could hurt voice quality as some concentrators inject delay into the audio streams. Check the delay specs on any VPN concentrator you are thinking about using to see how much delay you can expect to have to deal with. 3. Solution? Most new Cisco routers and switches support QoS configurations that enhance the probability of achieving good voice quality within a network. I do not know the specs on their VPN concentrators off the top of my head. HTH Bruce neil K. wrote: Hi Guys, I have a few questions regarding implementing VoIP. 1) Can I have different remote offices run VoIP if they have (DSL access of Cable modem access) to the Internet, I mean running VoiP over internet as there wouldn't be any QoS.I am not sure about the Quality of Voice in that case.Also can the service provider of DSL or Cable provide us with some kind of QoS so that the Voice quality can be improved. 2)Will implementing a VPN solution help in running VoIP and how and what are the different solutions and what vendors should I be looking at. 3) Does Cisco have a solution for this. Thanks in advance. Neil. K. -- Bruce Enders Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chesapeake NetCraftsmeno:(410)-280-6927, c:(443)-994-0678 1290 Bay Dale Drive, Suite 312 WWW: http://www.netcraftsmen.net Arnold, MD 21012-2325 Cisco CCSI# 96047 Efax 443-331-0651 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=61484t=61467 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OSPF DEMAND-CIRCUIT, not stopping the link UPDOWN [7:60719]
I have configured the peer neighbor, also checked the ospf cost which is more than the Ethernet and also point to point configured on BRi. I checked the ospf database but it was not showing the DNA bit was set. Any suggestions. Thanks, neil Eisert, James A (Jad) % wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Have you done a debug interesting packets to see exactly what is causing your dialer to dial? James A Eisert (Jad) HP Managed Services at Agere Systems Agere Operations Center 610-712-5700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: neil K. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 12:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OSPF DEMAND-CIRCUIT, not stopping the link UPDOWN [7:60719] Guys, The ISDN back between two of my routers keeps on dialling. I am running ospf over the ISDN which is a backup for frame relay link. I have configured the ISDN bri with ip ospf demand-circuit and still it keeps dialling.I have even used no peer-neighbor command on the interface. Please help. Thanks in Advance. neil k. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=60847t=60719 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OSPF DEMAND-CIRCUIT, not stopping the link UPDOWN [7:60719]
Guys, The ISDN back between two of my routers keeps on dialling. I am running ospf over the ISDN which is a backup for frame relay link. I have configured the ISDN bri with ip ospf demand-circuit and still it keeps dialling.I have even used no peer-neighbor command on the interface. Please help. Thanks in Advance. neil k. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=60719t=60719 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OSPF DEMAND-CIRCUIT, not stopping the link UPDOWN [7:60719]
I mean sh dialer. PPP multilink is enabled on the circuit. also no peer neighbor-route is defined. Still having problems. neil neil K. wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Guys, The ISDN back between two of my routers keeps on dialling. I am running ospf over the ISDN which is a backup for frame relay link. I have configured the ISDN bri with ip ospf demand-circuit and still it keeps dialling.I have even used no peer-neighbor command on the interface. Please help. Thanks in Advance. neil k. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=60791t=60719 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Virtual-link and area range command [7:60408]
Guys, How do I summarize a virtual link using area range command so that I can see the routes in RIP domain. Thanks, neil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=60408t=60408 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VPN Concetrator #3030 [7:58982]
Hi All, Few questions regarding the VPN Concentrator 1. what do I do for Redundancy, ( VPN Redundant Bundle) 2. Load balancing 3. Where to put the Concentrator ( prefer putting the VPN Concetrator behind Firewall).What are issues I will have to consider if I put the concentrator behind Firewall. Thanks, Sunil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=58982t=58982 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
extended access-list in/ out [7:58750]
guys, Please explain, how to apply extended access-list so as to permit inbound and outbound telnet access. I want to apply the access list to same interface in and out. Thanks, neil. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=58750t=58750 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FXO ports to connect two PBX's [7:58410]
Hi All, Can we use FXO ports in routers to connect two locations with PBX's. I have PBX at locaton A, and a PBX and location B. I want to run VoIP between the two locations over Frame Relay link. Can I use FXO cards in the Router on Location A and FXO on the router at location B and have VoIP run between the sites. The setup would look like this PBX to FXO --Frame Relay FXO to PBX. Any help will be highly appreciated. Thanks, Neil K. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=58410t=58410 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE written [7:58400]
It is very difficult, although the passing score is low ( less than 60 %) but you got to work really hard to pass it. neil saj wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi, Just want to know whether anyone has attempted CCIE theory and lab recently.Whether there are any changes.How hard is the CCIE written? Thanks. Saj __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=58411t=58400 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VoIP Testing :MOS Vs PQSM [7:58061]
Guys, VoIP Testing, do you go by MOS or PQSM. I mean when testing VoIP will perform on a network before implementing it. There are many tools that give a MOS score and many other tools give a PSQM report. What do you recommend? Thanks, Neil K. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=58061t=58061 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2950 EMI [7:57499]
NO. neil Arni V. Skarphedinsson wrote in message news:200211151017.KAA25359;groupstudy.com... I have a simple question, can the Catalyst 2950 switch with a EMI Software Image Route i.e. does it become a L3 swithc when the EMI images is loaded, like the 3550 can with the EMI Image. Best regards, Arni Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=57520t=57499 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FXS to key-system connection [7:57522]
Hi All, How can you interface the FXS to the key system.I mean FXS provides dial-tone so I was thinking only a phone or fax can be interfaced to an FXS port. Can anyone explain. Thanks in advance for your help. neil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=57522t=57522 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FR V/S Leased line [7:56764]
Checkout the definition of the Leased line and Frame-Relay, I am pretty sure that it will give you an idea about the advantages and disadvantages. Neil Hitesh Pathak R wrote in message news:200211030552.FAA27439;groupstudy.com... Dear Group, Does anybody know a url on the web which gives comparison or advantages between FrameRelay and Leased Line. Many thanks in Advance Hitesh DISCLAIMER: Information contained and transmitted by this E-MAIL is proprietary to Wipro Limited and is intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If this is a forwarded message, the content of this E-MAIL may not have been sent with the authority of the Company. If you are not the intended recipient, an agent of the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering the information to the named recipient, you are notified that any use, distribution, transmission, printing, copying or dissemination of this information in any way or in any manner is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please delete this mail notify us immediately at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=57057t=56764 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
frame-relay traffic shaping [7:55432]
Hi Group, Can someone please explain to me the difference between cir and mincir.Any help is highly appreciated. Regards, neil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55432t=55432 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CIR / minCIR [7:55284]
Hi Group, Can someone please explain to me the difference between cir and mincir.Any help is highly appreciated. Regards, neil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55284t=55284 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mincir/Cir [7:55223]
Hi Group, Can someone please explain to me the difference between cir and mincir.Any help is highly appreciated. Regards, neil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55223t=55223 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FXS and Key System connection [7:52288]
Hi Group, Could anyone please tell me is there a way to connect FXS to Key system, I was thinking that it can only be used to connect to an Analog phone or Fax, but I have heard there is a way to connect it to Key system, I guess in that case some programming might be needed in Key System. Please help, neil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52288t=52288 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dial out solution [7:51230]
Hi All, Guys I am currently using a Shiva modem pool for dial out, Is there a Cisco solution for this.The Shiva is not working upto our expectations. Will the Cisco Access Servers or a cisco 3640 with modem card be able to do the same. Any help will be highly apprecisted. Thanks, neiL Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=51230t=51230 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dial out solution [7:51231]
Hi All, Guys I am currently using a Shiva modem pool for dial out, Is there a Cisco solution for this.The Shiva is not working upto our expectations. Will the Cisco Access Servers or a cisco 3640 with modem card be able to do the same. Any help will be highly apprecisted. Thanks, neiL Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=51231t=51231 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
aironet wireless lan [7:50153]
Hi All, Recently Installed Aironet 1200 series based wireless LAN,with cisco LEAP authentication.Now the network works for a couple of days and then doesn't until I reboot the Access Points or the Cisco 3524-PWR-XL series switch from which the access points are powered. Has anybody faced problem like this. Any help will be highly appreciated. Neil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=50153t=50153 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VoIP Bandwidth Calculation you wil have to consider two VoIP [7:49381]
Hi All, Using the standard formulas, I see for a bandwidth required for a g.729 call is 24kbps without RTP compression.I used to do the same when using other codecs. Recently I came across some VoIP documentation which said that you will have to consider two RTP flows to simulate a call, and hence the requirement for Bandwidth doubles.say g729 24 kbps becomes almost 48kbps if u consider two RTP flows. Any help will be highly appreciated. Thanks, Neil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49381t=49381 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VoIP Bandwidth Calculation you wil have to consider two [7:49404]
Steve, It makes sense to consider two RTP flows as a conversation consists of full-duplex transmission. both people speak at the same time in a normal conversation, so that is why. please let me know if you have any thoughts on this neil Steven A. Ridder wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I'm not sure the context the document was written in, but it's only 24K (give or take depending on the L2 encap) that you need to plan for. Steve neil K. wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi All, Using the standard formulas, I see for a bandwidth required for a g.729 call is 24kbps without RTP compression.I used to do the same when using other codecs. Recently I came across some VoIP documentation which said that you will have to consider two RTP flows to simulate a call, and hence the requirement for Bandwidth doubles.say g729 24 kbps becomes almost 48kbps if u consider two RTP flows. Any help will be highly appreciated. Thanks, Neil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49404t=49404 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Implementiong QoS [7:49183]
Hi All, Please recommend a QoS technique for implementing on Cisco 2600's connected by Wireless links ( Aironet Wireless) which does not support any Qos. I mean I am planning to implement QoS on the Router's and the send the traffic to Bridges on to sides. I was planning to implement CBWFQ on the ethernet interfaces on the 2600. Any help will be highly appreciated. Sunil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49183t=49183 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE Written passed - Boson [7:45535]
Hi Alex, Congratulations. I am also planning to take the CCIE written next month.I don't have any material from Boson or from anybody else. Could you please tell me which book to follow for the QoS / performance, and how much of this stuff is asked in the exam. Also is the will Boson Material help a lot? Thanks, Neil Pierre-Alex Guanel wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I took the CCIE written yesterday afternoon and passed (80%) I was expecting more, but I flunked the performance/QoS section of the exam, which I neglected somewhat during preparation. I used both Boson #1 and Boson #3. Those 2 tests are complementary and are NOT substitute for each other. Boson #3 focuses on SNA issues where as Boson #1 focuses on the other networking topics. If you can, you should purchase both tests. For preparation I did a pre-test on Boson #3 and discovered how little SNA and ATM I knew. For 3 weeks, I studied SNA and ATM using CCO + hands-on until the whole thing felt natural. Then, on the 4th week of preparation I repeated the same strategy with Boson #1. I dicovered 3 areas of networking where I had some weaknesses. I only had time to work on 2 of them thoroughly before the test. Thank you to Bernard and Dennis for excellent test materials and to all those who gracefully took the time to answer my questions. I particularly want to thank Priscilla and Leigh Anne who both put me back on track several times during the last two years and Daniel Cotts for squeezing some time out of his busy schedule to spend some time discussing Cisco with me. Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=45543t=45535 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VPN Design [7:44953]
Hi All, 1. Could anyone please tell me what needs to be done on the PIX firewall if the Cisco VPN concentrator is placed in such a way as the public interface is in the DMZ and private interface on the inside network. 2. This design of placing the Concentraor in the DMZ is a little complex as compared to keeping the Concentrator Parallel to Firewall, which has security risks.Also in the case of Parallel design concentrator public address has to be in the IP subnet as the Firewall and the External Router( If I am not wrong) can this be overcome by placing the Concentrator in the DMZ. 3. Does the firewall need some routing capability so that it can route Encrypted packets to go thru concentrator or can it be done by adding routes to the servers pointing to concentrator. 4. What will have to be done if there are some AS-400 servers and we are planning to use IPsec. Any help will be highly appreciated. Thanks, Neil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=44953t=44953 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DEC VAX Nework and IP Network [7:39404]
Hi All, What must be done so that the IP network on Ethernet can talk to VAX Servers.? Also what do the DECserver 250 boxes do ? Any help will be appreciated. Neil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=39404t=39404 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE written -Query [7:37247]
You are right, No going back and they don't specify choose 3 or 4 they say choose all that apply. neil Chhetri Naresh wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi Gurus, Need some info about the written exam, is the written exam like other cisco exams where u cant go back and i have heard that for multiple questions unlike other cisco exams where they say choose 3 out of 6, for ccie written they just say select the correct ones from the option in other words they dont say that u have to select 3 or any number from the possible options listed. Could all of you pls enlighten me. Thanks in advance. Cheers Naresh Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37466t=37247 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Stupid 2500 confreg question [7:37287]
Reseat the Flash and the memory. This solved my PIX issue. neil Craig Columbus wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]; The cable is good and scroll lock isn't on. Same PC setup and cable work fine on other 2500 series. I haven't run into this particular issue before. Craig At 11:50 AM 3/5/2002 -0500, you wrote: Have you tried a different cable? - Original Message - From: Craig Columbus To: Cc: Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 11:18 AM Subject: Stupid 2500 confreg question Has anyone run into an issue where a 2500 series router won't respond to console input? Here's the deal: The PC is running 9600-8-N-1 and is connected to the 2500 console port. The router has had nvram erased and is being booted for the first time. Upon boot, the normal boot process is seen on the monitor screen. When prompted to enter configuration dialogue, it's not possible to input anything on the router. Typing does nothing and there is no response from the router. If Ctrl-F6-Break is pressed during boot, the router goes to the prompt, but after that, the router still won't accept any input from the console port. Has anyone experienced this issue? Is this a config register problem? If so, is there a fix other than experimenting with different settings on the PC side? If not, does anyone have an answer? Could it be bad boot ROM? Thanks, Craig _ Commercial lab list: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/commercial.html Please discuss commercial lab solutions on this list. _ Commercial lab list: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/commercial.html Please discuss commercial lab solutions on this list. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37289t=37287 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ISDN [7:37123]
ebay.com. mindiani mindiani wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Where can I buy an ISDN simulator for my home LAB ?. Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: Click Here Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37169t=37123 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debug ISDN q921 or debug isdn q931 [7:36837]
Hi All, I want Troubleshoot a ISDN connection to my 3600 series router, The Router has just one ISDN connection and rest are ATM PVC's.My question is , will the use of debug ISDN q921 and q931 be the right option or will it be so severe to bring down the router considering the router is in production. Thanks, neil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=36837t=36837 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Will the ccie writtn exams aailable from different [7:34998]
Hi All, I am preparing for CCIE written.Practice exams are available frommany website, could anyone please tell me, do these help and if so which website would you recommend. Thanks in advance, Neil K. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=34998t=34998 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
