Re: Port Assignment with Static IP
What are you refering to? If you want to assign the same IP address to multiple interfaces on the same router, then you must disable routing and configure bridging. The only way to get a clearer picture of what you want to accomplish is to have more detail. -- Willie Bell CCIE,CCDP,CNE email [EMAIL PROTECTED] Adele Galus wrote: > Need the professionals here: > > Why is it, that you can not assign more than one Static IP Address to > the same > port number??? I have to configure this router on Monday. Thank you. > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FastEthernet
If you are using a switch and using ISL or DOT1Q trunking, a network can be added to a FE sub-interface and belong in a different area. "Stull, Cory" wrote: > Kevin, > > Just looked at the Cisco OSPF design guide.. Neighbor negotiation applies > to the primary address only. Secondary addresses can be configured on an > interface with a restriction that they have to belong to the same area as > the primary address. > > Still not sure this applies to sub-interfaces but would have to assume so > judging by what your seeing. > > Cory > > -Original Message- > From: Kevin Wigle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 9:17 AM > To: cisco > Subject: FastEthernet > > Can't get to a router with a fe interface at the moment > > Can a FE use sub-interfaces? > > A problem we encountered is that we tried to bring up a new cct. > > The FE already had on OSPF area on it - say area 2 > > We added a secondary address and put that network into area 3 > > All hell broke loose. > > Can I add a sub-interface and put the ip address there with the new OSPF > area? > > Kevin Wigle > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PAT
PAT can be used when there is a limited number of IP addresses available for a NAT pool or when the NAT pool becomes exhausted and an over flow method is needed. Keep in mind that when using PAT, some applications do not operate well or some fail to operate. Austin wrote: > When does one need to configure PAT on the PIX? > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Willie Bell CCIE# 6075, CCDP email [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ONE or TWO PIXs
It depends on what you want to accomplish. Do you want redundacy, do you want ease of administration, etc. You must ask yourself how criticial the internet is to your business and if the internet plays a major role in the way your company conducts business. Having two PIX boxes can eliminate at least one single point of failure. Willie Bell CCIE-6075, CCDP, CNE fmxiao wrote: > All kindly guys, I need some help or suggestion > > Our company has two lines connecting to Internet, one is only 64K for DNS or > mail server, > the other is for WWW service. We have two PC servers with NT 4.0 + MS Proxy > 2.0 as a firewall > Now we want to buy PIX instead of the two PCs. > DO WE NEED ONE or TWO PIXs for this situation? > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Willie Bell CCIE# 6075, CCDP email [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ATM & VTP
Robert, from my experience with bridging VLAN traffic between two LANE modules, the entire VLAN database is not bridged over a PVC, only the individual VLAN that is bound to it. If you want all of the VLANs to be accessable by the remote switch, then you will need a PVC per VLAN. Willie Bell CCIE# 6075, CCDP email [EMAIL PROTECTED] "McCallum, Robert" wrote: > Hi , > > Scenario is 2 cat 5509's connected together with an STM-1. Both are in the > same VTP domain but will not speak to each other. Configs are pasted below. > I DO NOT want to have management traffic (vlan 1) traversing across this > link. This link is working just VTP is not traversing. First question is > Does LANE trunking allow VTP to cross? > > CAT 1 > > set vtp domain BSKYB > set vtp mode server > set vtp v2 disable > set vtp pruning enable > #spantree > #uplinkfast groups > set spantree uplinkfast enable rate 15 all-protocols off > #backbonefast > set spantree backbonefast enable > set spantree enable all > #module 9 : 2-port SM OC-3 Dual-Phy ATM > set module name9 > set port level 9/1 normal > set port name 9/1-2 > set cdp enable 9/1 > set cdp interval 9/1 60 > set trunk 9/1 on lane 1-1005 > set spantree portcost9/1 3014 > set spantree portpri 9/1 32 > set spantree portvlanpri 9/1 0 > set spantree portvlancost 9/1 cost 3013 > > on the atm card > > sess 9 > > interface ATM0 > atm preferred phy A > atm pvc 1 2 50 aal5snap > atm pvc 2 2 60 aal5snap > atm bind pvc vlan 1 10 > atm bind pvc vlan 2 2 > > CAT 2 > > set vtp domain BSKYB > set vtp mode server > set vtp v2 disable > set vtp pruning enable > #spantree > #uplinkfast groups > set spantree uplinkfast enable rate 15 all-protocols off > #backbonefast > set spantree backbonefast enable > set spantree enable all > #module 9 : 2-port SM OC-3 Dual-Phy ATM > set module name9 > set port level 9/1 normal > set port name 9/1-2 > set cdp enable 9/1 > set cdp interval 9/1 60 > set trunk 9/1 on lane 1-1005 > set spantree portcost9/1 3014 > set spantree portpri 9/1 32 > set spantree portvlanpri 9/1 0 > set spantree portvlancost 9/1 cost 3013 > > interface ATM0 > atm preferred phy A > atm sonet stm-1 > atm uni-version 3.1 > atm pvc 1 2 50 aal5snap > atm pvc 2 2 60 aal5snap > atm pvc 3 0 5 qsaal > atm pvc 4 0 16 ilmi > atm bind pvc vlan 1 10 > atm bind pvc vlan 2 2 > > Any help much appreciated. > > P.S. cdp IS working over this ATM link. > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Speed performance!!
JW, be more specific about your network topology. Where are the users in reference to the server? What type of network hardware are you using (hubs, switches, etc.) and with is the type and speed of your WAN links if any?? If you network does not have the adequate horse power and bandwidth to handle the load needed to access the server, summarization will not help much. Granted it helps in optimizing routing but if 600 users are trying to access a server on a hub, you are still going to suffer. jeongwoo park wrote: > Hi all > My file server is on 140.222.20.1/24 > Clients are on these four subnets. > 140.222.150.0/24 > 140.222.181.0/24 > 140.222.237.0/24 > 140.222.200.0/24 > > There is such a slow data transfer rate going from any > of these 4 subnets to the subnet where the server is. > All clients get DHCP ip addresses > As a suggestion, someone told me to supernet. > As far as I know, in order to supernet, subnet ip > addresses should be contiguous, and I think the idea > of supernetting is to include multiple subnets into > one supernetted subnet. So we can transfer data within > one subnet instead of transferring through router for > subnet-to-subnet transfer. > However, these five subnet ip addresses are not > contiguous. > How can I supernet non-contiguous subnet ip addresses? > By following Cisco book instruction on supernetting, I > got this address: 140.222.0.0/16 Is this correct? > If this was correctly supernetted, what should I do > next? > Should I go to each individual stations (about 600 > stations) for new TCP/IP setup? I am sure there should > be better way to handle this. > > I have only several months of network experience. I am > still newbie. > I will appreciate your help > Thanks in adv. > > jw > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > From homework help to love advice, Yahoo! Experts has your answer. > http://experts.yahoo.com/ > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Willie Bell CCIE# 6075, CCDP email [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
