JW, be more specific about your network topology. Where are the users in reference to
the server? What type of network hardware are you using (hubs, switches, etc.) and with
is the type and speed of your WAN links if any?? If you network does not have the
adequate horse power and bandwidth to  handle the load needed to access the server,
summarization will not help much. Granted it helps in optimizing routing but if 600
users are trying to access a server on a hub, you are still going to suffer.

jeongwoo park wrote:

> Hi all
> My file server is on 140.222.20.1/24
> Clients are on these four subnets.
> 140.222.150.0/24
> 140.222.181.0/24
> 140.222.237.0/24
> 140.222.200.0/24
>
> There is such a slow data transfer rate going from any
> of these 4 subnets to the subnet where the server is.
> All clients get DHCP ip addresses
> As a suggestion, someone told me to supernet.
> As far as I know, in order to supernet, subnet ip
> addresses should be contiguous, and I think the idea
> of supernetting is to include multiple subnets into
> one supernetted subnet. So we can transfer data within
> one subnet instead of transferring through router for
> subnet-to-subnet transfer.
> However, these five subnet ip addresses are not
> contiguous.
> How can I supernet non-contiguous subnet ip addresses?
> By following Cisco book instruction on supernetting, I
> got this address: 140.222.0.0/16 Is this correct?
> If this was correctly supernetted, what should I do
> next?
> Should I go to each individual stations (about 600
> stations) for new TCP/IP setup? I am sure there should
> be better way to handle this.
>
> I have only several months of network experience. I am
> still newbie.
> I will appreciate your help
> Thanks in adv.
>
> jw
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> From homework help to love advice, Yahoo! Experts has your answer.
> http://experts.yahoo.com/
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
Willie Bell
CCIE# 6075, CCDP
email [EMAIL PROTECTED]


_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to