Re: Aeronet Comparisons

2000-11-27 Thread Michael Snyder

Check out the Lucent RG1000.  It's a mini-AP with a mini-price.  Comes with
a 56K modem that dials out and does NAT.  Comes with 40bit encryption if you
use the Lucent Silver PCMCIA card.  Cheaper than cisco PC card anyway.

I take the RG1000 with me onsite, it's fits in my laptop carrying case.
Plug it in, any I get wireless internet in about a 150' radius.

Also has a ethernet port, and can be used as a transparent AP also.


""Kevin Wigle"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
009d01c05719$7ef10ee0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:009d01c05719$7ef10ee0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 snip

 I'm thinking about buying a Linksys AP to have at home when I have to give
 the Cisco AP back.  Only $252 at buy.com, compared to Cisco's $700+ cost
(I
 know, I lose encryption, but this is at my house and I could care less,
plus
 I use SSH for everything except generic web access anyway).

 --
 Jason Roysdon, CCNA, MCSE, CNA, Network+, A+
 List email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Homepage: http://jason.artoo.net/
 Cisco resources: http://r2cisco.artoo.net/

 snip

 Jason,

 I'm also looking at the Linksys for home and I'm wondering why you said
that
 you would lose encryption?  I don't know squat about wireless but here is
a
 snippet from the Linksys website:

 Features

 - High-Speed Transfer Rate of Up to 11 Mbps
 - Interoperable with IEEE 802.11b (DSSS) 2.4GHz-compliant Equipment
 - Provides Roaming, Best Access Point Selection, Load Balancing, and
Network
 Traffic Filtering
 - Supports up to 32 users/nodes
 - Long Operating Range Supports 120m (indoor) and 300m (outdoor)
 - Advanced Power Management Features Conserve Valuable Battery Life
 - Hardware Wireless Encryption Protocol
 - Compatible with Windows 95, 98, 2000, NT v.4 and Millennium

 They said that it is interoperable with 802.11b

 and they say it has Hardware Wireless Encryption Protocol.

 Here's where I got the info, the device is the WAP11 Instant Wireless
 Network Access Point.

 http://www.linksys.com/products/product.asp?prid=157grid=19

 Are we talking about the same thing/device?

 Kevin Wigle


 _
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Aeronet Comparisons

2000-11-25 Thread Paul Schultz



Cisco Aironet stuff works quite well, but you have to be very careful with
it.  Aironet uses direct sequence spread spectrum technology which doesn't
scale well at all.. There's 11 possible channels to use, but only 3 of
them are non-overlapping.. so basically in one given rooftop or so you're
limited to only having 3 DS access points.

If you need to have more coverage with more antennas you should probably
look at some frequency hopping spread spectrum wireless lan gear such as
breezecom.



On 22 Nov 2000, Charles Nunie wrote:

 Hello Everyone,
 
 We are gearing up to launch the Aeronet in our local market.
 
 Can anyone tell em how well the Aeronet compare with other Wireless LAN
 equipment on the market.
 
 Dzilo
 
 
 Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1
 

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Aeronet Comparisons

2000-11-25 Thread Kevin Wigle

snip

I'm thinking about buying a Linksys AP to have at home when I have to give
the Cisco AP back.  Only $252 at buy.com, compared to Cisco's $700+ cost (I
know, I lose encryption, but this is at my house and I could care less, plus
I use SSH for everything except generic web access anyway).

--
Jason Roysdon, CCNA, MCSE, CNA, Network+, A+
List email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage: http://jason.artoo.net/
Cisco resources: http://r2cisco.artoo.net/

snip

Jason,

I'm also looking at the Linksys for home and I'm wondering why you said that
you would lose encryption?  I don't know squat about wireless but here is a
snippet from the Linksys website:

Features

- High-Speed Transfer Rate of Up to 11 Mbps
- Interoperable with IEEE 802.11b (DSSS) 2.4GHz-compliant Equipment
- Provides Roaming, Best Access Point Selection, Load Balancing, and Network
Traffic Filtering
- Supports up to 32 users/nodes
- Long Operating Range Supports 120m (indoor) and 300m (outdoor)
- Advanced Power Management Features Conserve Valuable Battery Life
- Hardware Wireless Encryption Protocol
- Compatible with Windows 95, 98, 2000, NT v.4 and Millennium

They said that it is interoperable with 802.11b

and they say it has Hardware Wireless Encryption Protocol.

Here's where I got the info, the device is the WAP11 Instant Wireless
Network Access Point.

http://www.linksys.com/products/product.asp?prid=157grid=19

Are we talking about the same thing/device?

Kevin Wigle


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Aeronet Comparisons

2000-11-25 Thread Jason Roysdon

Oh, you're correct, I really hadn't looked into much detail on the Linksys
just yet.  However, it does only support 40bit encyption (vs. 128bit on the
Cisco), but some is better than none.

--
Jason Roysdon, CCNA, MCSE, CNA, Network+, A+
List email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage: http://jason.artoo.net/
Cisco resources: http://r2cisco.artoo.net/


""Kevin Wigle"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
009d01c05719$7ef10ee0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:009d01c05719$7ef10ee0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 snip

 I'm thinking about buying a Linksys AP to have at home when I have to give
 the Cisco AP back.  Only $252 at buy.com, compared to Cisco's $700+ cost
(I
 know, I lose encryption, but this is at my house and I could care less,
plus
 I use SSH for everything except generic web access anyway).

 --
 Jason Roysdon, CCNA, MCSE, CNA, Network+, A+
 List email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Homepage: http://jason.artoo.net/
 Cisco resources: http://r2cisco.artoo.net/

 snip

 Jason,

 I'm also looking at the Linksys for home and I'm wondering why you said
that
 you would lose encryption?  I don't know squat about wireless but here is
a
 snippet from the Linksys website:

 Features

 - High-Speed Transfer Rate of Up to 11 Mbps
 - Interoperable with IEEE 802.11b (DSSS) 2.4GHz-compliant Equipment
 - Provides Roaming, Best Access Point Selection, Load Balancing, and
Network
 Traffic Filtering
 - Supports up to 32 users/nodes
 - Long Operating Range Supports 120m (indoor) and 300m (outdoor)
 - Advanced Power Management Features Conserve Valuable Battery Life
 - Hardware Wireless Encryption Protocol
 - Compatible with Windows 95, 98, 2000, NT v.4 and Millennium

 They said that it is interoperable with 802.11b

 and they say it has Hardware Wireless Encryption Protocol.

 Here's where I got the info, the device is the WAP11 Instant Wireless
 Network Access Point.

 http://www.linksys.com/products/product.asp?prid=157grid=19

 Are we talking about the same thing/device?

 Kevin Wigle


 _
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Aeronet Comparisons

2000-11-25 Thread Kevin Wigle

snip

Oh, you're correct, I really hadn't looked into much detail on the Linksys
just yet.  However, it does only support 40bit encryption (vs. 128bit on the
Cisco), but some is better than none.

snip

ok, cool.

I wouldn't want to use it if it had no encryption.  Might only be at home
but no need to broadcast my income tax form to the neighbors!

Again, I'm not up on just what 802.11b entails - does this protocol have the
limitation of only 40bit?  I didn't see any mention of encryption strength
on their web site (including the pdf file)so I gather the encryption
strength is a characteristic on the 802.11b protocol?

Just wondering.

Kevin Wigle

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Aeronet Comparisons

2000-11-24 Thread Jason Roysdon

Win98SE driver installs much more cleanly for the Aeronet than the 3Com
stuff.  I was evaluating both for a bit and was constantly having problems
with the 3Com side.  Both worked fine in Windows 2000 Pro.

Both Access Points (APs) work great, and work fine with either card.  I
think the Cisco interface is a bit more friendly than the 3Com.  Also, it
supports 100mbit to the network, vs. the 3Com was only 10mbit.  The cards
are of course 11mbit, but you can't possibly get that if the network
connection is only 10mbit.  I don't know how much overhead the wireless
protocol has, but it seems to fly with either card/AP(of course, I only
tested with my sole laptop).

I'm thinking about buying a Linksys AP to have at home when I have to give
the Cisco AP back.  Only $252 at buy.com, compared to Cisco's $700+ cost (I
know, I lose encryption, but this is at my house and I could care less, plus
I use SSH for everything except generic web access anyway).

--
Jason Roysdon, CCNA, MCSE, CNA, Network+, A+
List email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage: http://jason.artoo.net/
Cisco resources: http://r2cisco.artoo.net/


"Charles Nunie" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hello Everyone,

We are gearing up to launch the Aeronet in our local market.

Can anyone tell em how well the Aeronet compare with other Wireless LAN
equipment on the market.

Dzilo


Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1



_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Aeronet Comparisons

2000-11-22 Thread Charles Nunie

Hello Everyone,

We are gearing up to launch the Aeronet in our local market.

Can anyone tell em how well the Aeronet compare with other Wireless LAN
equipment on the market.

Dzilo


Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1



Hi everyone,

we have implemented both a radio and a dial-up link
   from a branch office to the head office of a firm.

   since the branch office has no router but rather a
   switch, we have set up each workstation/equipment on
   the lan to see the radio as its primary gateway and
   the branch dial-up access server as the secondary
   gateway.

   how do we get the cisco4500 router at the head office
   to accept information through the dial up when the
   radio link goes down. better still how do we get the
   cisco4500 to dynamically route between the two links 


Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1