PPP over Frame-Relay
Hi I am trying to make this PPP over Frame-Relay with two Cisco 2501 running 12.0.5(T) see below. For some reason this does not work? can someone please help me to get this to work, I have ran the debug commands and it seems like its working but I can not ping each other for some reason. I have both my config's below... Current configuration: ! version 12.0 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption service udp-small-servers service tcp-small-servers ! hostname DCE ! enable password brian ! username brian password 0 brian ! ! ! ! ip subnet-zero ! virtual-profile virtual-template 1 frame-relay switching cns event-service server ! ! ! interface Ethernet0 ip address 64.32.168.37 255.255.255.224 no ip directed-broadcast ! interface Virtual-Template1 ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast no peer default ip address ppp authentication chap pap ! interface Serial0 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast encapsulation frame-relay clockrate 64000 frame-relay lmi-type ansi frame-relay intf-type dce ! interface Serial0.1 point-to-point no ip directed-broadcast frame-relay interface-dlci 32 ppp Virtual-Template1 ! interface Serial1 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast shutdown ! interface TokenRing0 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast shutdown ! no ip classless ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Virtual-Template1 no ip http server ! access-list 1 permit 10.1.1.1 ! ! line con 0 transport input none line aux 0 line vty 0 4 password pp login ! end DCE#sho ver Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) 2500 Software (C2500-JS-L), Version 12.0(7)T, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2) Copyright (c) 1986-1999 by cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled Mon 06-Dec-99 17:10 by phanguye Image text-base: 0x0306C4E0, data-base: 0x1000 ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 5.2(8a), RELEASE SOFTWARE BOOTFLASH: 3000 Bootstrap Software (IGS-RXBOOT), Version 10.2(8a), RELEASE SOFTW ARE (fc1) DCE uptime is 5 minutes System returned to ROM by power-on System image file is "flash:c2500-120T.bin" cisco 2500 (68030) processor (revision E) with 8192K/2048K bytes of memory. Processor board ID 03897480, with hardware revision Bridging software. X.25 software, Version 3.0.0. SuperLAT software (copyright 1990 by Meridian Technology Corp). TN3270 Emulation software. 1 Ethernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s) 1 Token Ring/IEEE 802.5 interface(s) 2 Serial network interface(s) 32K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory. 16384K bytes of processor board System flash (Read ONLY) Configuration register is 0x2102 DCE# DTE#sho run Building configuration... Current configuration: ! version 12.0 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption service udp-small-servers service tcp-small-servers ! hostname DTE ! enable password pp ! username brian password 0 brian ! ! ! ! ip subnet-zero ! virtual-profile virtual-template 1 cns event-service server ! ! ! interface Ethernet0 ip address 64.32.168.37 255.255.255.224 no ip directed-broadcast ! interface Virtual-Template1 ip address 10.1.1.2 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast ppp authentication chap pap ! interface Serial0 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast encapsulation frame-relay frame-relay lmi-type ansi ! interface Serial0.1 point-to-point no ip directed-broadcast frame-relay interface-dlci 32 ppp Virtual-Template1 ! interface Serial1 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast shutdown ! interface TokenRing0 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast shutdown ! no ip classless ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Virtual-Template1 no ip http server ! access-list 1 permit 10.1.1.2 ! ! line con 0 transport input none line aux 0 line vty 0 4 password pp login ! end DTE#ping 10.1.1.1 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.1.1.1, timeout is 2 seconds: .. Success rate is 0 percent (0/2) DTE#sho ip int brief Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status Prot ocol Ethernet0 64.32.168.37YES NVRAM up down Serial0unassigned YES NVRAM upup Serial0.1 unassigned YES unset upup Serial1unassigned YES NVRAM administratively down down TokenRing0 unassigned YES NVRAM administratively down down Virtual-Access110.1.1.2YES TFTP up down Virtual-Template1 10.1.1.2YES NVRAM down down DTE#sho ver Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) 2500 Software (C2500-JS-L), Version 12.0(7)T, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2) Copyright (c) 1986-1999 by cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled Mon 06-Dec-99 17:10 by phanguye Image text-base: 0x0306C4E0, data-base: 0x1000 ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 5.2(8a), RELEASE SOFTWARE BOOTFLASH: 3000 Boo
Re: PPP over Frame-Relay
can you attach debug ppp packet & debug vtemplate rahul. - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 8:54 AM Subject: PPP over Frame-Relay > >Hi > > I am trying to make this PPP over Frame-Relay with two Cisco 2501 > running 12.0.5(T) see below. For some reason this does not work? can someone > please help me to get this to work, I have ran the debug commands and it > seems like its working but I can not ping each other for some reason. > > I have both my config's below... > > > > > > Current configuration: > ! > version 12.0 > service timestamps debug uptime > service timestamps log uptime > no service password-encryption > service udp-small-servers > service tcp-small-servers > ! > hostname DCE > ! > enable password brian > ! > username brian password 0 brian > ! > ! > ! > ! > ip subnet-zero > ! > virtual-profile virtual-template 1 > frame-relay switching > cns event-service server > ! > ! > ! > interface Ethernet0 > ip address 64.32.168.37 255.255.255.224 > no ip directed-broadcast > ! > interface Virtual-Template1 > ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 > no ip directed-broadcast > no peer default ip address > ppp authentication chap pap > ! > interface Serial0 > no ip address > no ip directed-broadcast > encapsulation frame-relay > clockrate 64000 > frame-relay lmi-type ansi > frame-relay intf-type dce > ! > interface Serial0.1 point-to-point > no ip directed-broadcast > frame-relay interface-dlci 32 ppp Virtual-Template1 > ! > interface Serial1 > no ip address > no ip directed-broadcast > shutdown > ! > interface TokenRing0 > no ip address > no ip directed-broadcast > shutdown > ! > no ip classless > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Virtual-Template1 > no ip http server > ! > access-list 1 permit 10.1.1.1 > ! > ! > line con 0 > transport input none > line aux 0 > line vty 0 4 > password pp > login > ! > end > > DCE#sho ver > Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software > IOS (tm) 2500 Software (C2500-JS-L), Version 12.0(7)T, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2) > Copyright (c) 1986-1999 by cisco Systems, Inc. > Compiled Mon 06-Dec-99 17:10 by phanguye > Image text-base: 0x0306C4E0, data-base: 0x1000 > > ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 5.2(8a), RELEASE SOFTWARE > BOOTFLASH: 3000 Bootstrap Software (IGS-RXBOOT), Version 10.2(8a), RELEASE > SOFTW > ARE (fc1) > > DCE uptime is 5 minutes > System returned to ROM by power-on > System image file is "flash:c2500-120T.bin" > > cisco 2500 (68030) processor (revision E) with 8192K/2048K bytes of memory. > Processor board ID 03897480, with hardware revision > Bridging software. > X.25 software, Version 3.0.0. > SuperLAT software (copyright 1990 by Meridian Technology Corp). > TN3270 Emulation software. > 1 Ethernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s) > 1 Token Ring/IEEE 802.5 interface(s) > 2 Serial network interface(s) > 32K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory. > 16384K bytes of processor board System flash (Read ONLY) > > Configuration register is 0x2102 > > DCE# > > > > > > > DTE#sho run > Building configuration... > > Current configuration: > ! > version 12.0 > service timestamps debug uptime > service timestamps log uptime > no service password-encryption > service udp-small-servers > service tcp-small-servers > ! > hostname DTE > ! > enable password pp > ! > username brian password 0 brian > ! > ! > ! > ! > ip subnet-zero > ! > virtual-profile virtual-template 1 > cns event-service server > ! > ! > ! > interface Ethernet0 > ip address 64.32.168.37 255.255.255.224 > no ip directed-broadcast > ! > interface Virtual-Template1 > ip address 10.1.1.2 255.255.255.0 > no ip directed-broadcast > ppp authentication chap pap > ! > interface Serial0 > no ip address > no ip directed-broadcast > encapsulation frame-relay > frame-relay lmi-type ansi > ! > interface Serial0.1 point-to-point > no ip directed-broadcast > frame-relay interface-dlci 32 ppp Virtual-Template1 > ! > interface Serial1 > no ip address > no ip directed-broadcast > shutdown > ! > interface TokenRing0 > no ip address > no ip directed-broadcast > shutdown > ! > no ip classless > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Virtual-Template1 > no ip http server > ! > access-list 1 permit 10.1.1.2 > ! > ! > line con 0 > transport input none > line aux 0 > line vty 0 4 > password pp &
Re: PPP over Frame-Relay
I got it to work, all I needed to do was to remove the =A0 ppp authenticatio= n=20 chap pap and it I could ping each other. Thanks Brian _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PPP over Frame Relay [7:36300]
I believe someone might have mentioned this recently but since I'm studying it right now I thought I'd ask again... What the heck would be a real-world application of PPP over Frame Relay? If you want it for the authentication this is a lot of work! You need to setup a subinterface *and* a virtual template for every PVC! What a pain Then again, if you're using multipoint interfaces you'd simply use ip unnumbered and a single virtual template. Hmm what might we actually do with this? Interestingly, I just combined two features that I've never configured before: PPPoFR and FREEK. It makes my config look fairly odd. :-) John Get your own "800" number Voicemail, fax, email, and a lot more http://www.ureach.com/reg/tag Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36300&t=36300 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PPP over Frame Relay [7:36300]
John, PPPoFR solution is to maintain leased line PPP end to end over SP's FR backbone..Following is the sample topology : CPE--PPP/LL--SP--FR+PPP--SP--PPP/LL--CPE But later started using in Broadband environment with following topology : CPE--PPPoFR/xDSL--DSLAM--PPPoFR--SP--PPPoFR--ISP/Wholesale provider But now you will find PPPoE, oEoA, oA & oEoVLAN, as you can see several L2 tech. is used but the goal is to maintain PPP end-to-end due to its feature for AAA purpose.. thanks, rahul. ""John Neiberger"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I believe someone might have mentioned this recently but since > I'm studying it right now I thought I'd ask again... > > What the heck would be a real-world application of PPP over > Frame Relay? If you want it for the authentication this is a > lot of work! > > You need to setup a subinterface *and* a virtual template for > every PVC! What a pain Then again, if you're using > multipoint interfaces you'd simply use ip unnumbered and a > single virtual template. > > Hmm what might we actually do with this? Interestingly, I > just combined two features that I've never configured before: > PPPoFR and FREEK. It makes my config look fairly odd. :-) > > John > > > Get your own "800" number > Voicemail, fax, email, and a lot more > http://www.ureach.com/reg/tag Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36320&t=36300 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PPP over Frame Relay [7:36300]
The real purpose is just to make life more complicated. Seriously, I cannot even think of a single reason why I would ever want to use PPPoFR in real life. ""Rahul Kachalia"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > John, > > PPPoFR solution is to maintain leased line PPP end to end over SP's FR > backbone..Following is the sample topology : > > CPE--PPP/LL--SP--FR+PPP--SP--PPP/LL--CPE > > But later started using in Broadband environment with following topology > : > > CPE--PPPoFR/xDSL--DSLAM--PPPoFR--SP--PPPoFR--ISP/Wholesale provider > > But now you will find PPPoE, oEoA, oA & oEoVLAN, as you can see several > L2 tech. is used but the goal is to maintain PPP end-to-end due to its > feature for AAA purpose.. > > thanks, > rahul. > > > ""John Neiberger"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > I believe someone might have mentioned this recently but since > > I'm studying it right now I thought I'd ask again... > > > > What the heck would be a real-world application of PPP over > > Frame Relay? If you want it for the authentication this is a > > lot of work! > > > > You need to setup a subinterface *and* a virtual template for > > every PVC! What a pain Then again, if you're using > > multipoint interfaces you'd simply use ip unnumbered and a > > single virtual template. > > > > Hmm what might we actually do with this? Interestingly, I > > just combined two features that I've never configured before: > > PPPoFR and FREEK. It makes my config look fairly odd. :-) > > > > John > > > > > > Get your own "800" number > > Voicemail, fax, email, and a lot more > > http://www.ureach.com/reg/tag Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36337&t=36300 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PPP over Frame Relay [7:36300]
>The real purpose is just to make life more complicated. > >Seriously, I cannot even think of a single reason why I would ever want to >use PPPoFR in real life. Rahul is perfectly correct. In the SP world, regulatory concerns may enter. For example, in the US, an ILEC can't terminate IP as part of its basic service. It can use IP in its infrastructure, as, for example, putting an L2TP proxy client in one of its POPs, extracting the PPP, and then sending the PPP to the ultimate server at the ISP. If the transport for that last leg happened to be FR, PPPoFR might be an alternative, although I tend to prefer L2TP. > > > > > > >""Rahul Kachalia"" wrote in message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... >> John, >> >> PPPoFR solution is to maintain leased line PPP end to end over SP's FR >> backbone..Following is the sample topology : >> >> CPE--PPP/LL--SP--FR+PPP--SP--PPP/LL--CPE >> >> But later started using in Broadband environment with following >topology >> : >> >> CPE--PPPoFR/xDSL--DSLAM--PPPoFR--SP--PPPoFR--ISP/Wholesale provider >> >> But now you will find PPPoE, oEoA, oA & oEoVLAN, as you can see >several >> L2 tech. is used but the goal is to maintain PPP end-to-end due to its >> feature for AAA purpose.. >> >> thanks, >> rahul. >> >> >> ""John Neiberger"" wrote in message >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... >> > I believe someone might have mentioned this recently but since >> > I'm studying it right now I thought I'd ask again... >> > >> > What the heck would be a real-world application of PPP over >> > Frame Relay? If you want it for the authentication this is a >> > lot of work! >> > >> > You need to setup a subinterface *and* a virtual template for >> > every PVC! What a pain Then again, if you're using >> > multipoint interfaces you'd simply use ip unnumbered and a >> > single virtual template. >> > >> > Hmm what might we actually do with this? Interestingly, I >> > just combined two features that I've never configured before: >> > PPPoFR and FREEK. It makes my config look fairly odd. :-) >> > > > > John -- "What Problem are you trying to solve?" ***send Cisco questions to the list, so all can benefit -- not directly to me*** Howard C. Berkowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chief Technology Officer, GettLab/Gett Communications Technical Director, CertificationZone.com "retired" Certified Cisco Systems Instructor (CID) #93005 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36342&t=36300 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
