Re: Cisco 700 series in Remote Access exam (640-505) [7:26975]
Wow how timely, I got a call from a customer yesterday that sounds very similiar. Data works fine, outgoing faxes no problem but can't get incoming faxes to work. I'm no Combinet fan, I have on;y configed a couple of the things quite a while ago but if I find something I'll pass it along and please do the same!! Thanks Dave Dean Martin wrote: > I'm wondering if anyone can help me with this problem. I am no router > expert by any means but have inherited the configuration duties for a Cisco > 776 for a non-profit organization I am part of. > > I have the network set up, IP address and DHCP configured and working > nicely, however, the POTS line in to a fax machine will not take incoming > calls. Incoming priority is set to ALWAYS but (with the telnet screen open) > the router does not appear to even see the call coming in. > > This has to be something incredibly simple - can anyone point me in the > right direction? > > Thanks, > Dean Martin -- David Madland CCIE# 2016 Senior Network Engineer Qwest Communications 612-664-3367 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=29649&t=26975 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco 700 series in Remote Access exam (640-505) [7:26975]
I'm wondering if anyone can help me with this problem. I am no router expert by any means but have inherited the configuration duties for a Cisco 776 for a non-profit organization I am part of. I have the network set up, IP address and DHCP configured and working nicely, however, the POTS line in to a fax machine will not take incoming calls. Incoming priority is set to ALWAYS but (with the telnet screen open) the router does not appear to even see the call coming in. This has to be something incredibly simple - can anyone point me in the right direction? Thanks, Dean Martin Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=29630&t=26975 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco 700 series in Remote Access exam (640-505) [7:26975]
The 1st router I ever set up was the Cisco 765. At that time (3 years ago) it did *not* run the CISCO IOS. I guess it still does not run the IOS. It runs/ran a quirky version of the IOS. So any questions they would ask you about the 7xx series would have to take that into account (I guess). Hope this helps -Anil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 23, 2001 12:38 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Cisco 700 series in Remote Access exam (640-505) [7:26975] Hai, I just taken BCRAN 20/11/01, on my exam there was no Cisco 700. Even when I took the BCRAN tranning from cisco tranning center, they skip the subject. > -- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED][SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 4:29 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Cisco 700 series in Remote Access exam (640-505) [7:26975] > > Hello, > > (This is my first post in this wonderful newsgroup) > > > Will the said content (700 series router) still tested on the real > test? > I'll take the test on next week. > > And it still occupied one chapter in the book "CCNP remote access > exam > certification Guide", but not on the exam topics published by Cisco.. > > Any folks taken the exam recently can share the experiences? > > Thanks a lot :> > > > Regards, > c.h.Ip > > > > ps. Any people in Hong Kong here? want to find one or more study > parthers~ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27185&t=26975 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco 700 series in Remote Access exam (640-505) [7:26975]
Hai, I just taken BCRAN 20/11/01, on my exam there was no Cisco 700. Even when I took the BCRAN tranning from cisco tranning center, they skip the subject. > -- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED][SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 4:29 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Cisco 700 series in Remote Access exam (640-505) [7:26975] > > Hello, > > (This is my first post in this wonderful newsgroup) > > > Will the said content (700 series router) still tested on the real > test? > I'll take the test on next week. > > And it still occupied one chapter in the book "CCNP remote access > exam > certification Guide", but not on the exam topics published by Cisco.. > > Any folks taken the exam recently can share the experiences? > > Thanks a lot :> > > > Regards, > c.h.Ip > > > > ps. Any people in Hong Kong here? want to find one or more study > parthers~ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27160&t=26975 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco 700 series in Remote Access exam (640-505) [7:26975]
There was one question I think. Can't remember what it was though. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 12:29 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco 700 series in Remote Access exam (640-505) [7:26975] Hello, (This is my first post in this wonderful newsgroup) Will the said content (700 series router) still tested on the real test? I'll take the test on next week. And it still occupied one chapter in the book "CCNP remote access exam certification Guide", but not on the exam topics published by Cisco.. Any folks taken the exam recently can share the experiences? Thanks a lot :> Regards, c.h.Ip ps. Any people in Hong Kong here? want to find one or more study parthers~ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26980&t=26975 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
