Re: Failover distance between two PIXes [7:11468]
Without the serial cable, there is no way to keep the configs updated on both machines. The ethernet cables are actualy what control failover. In theory, you could run ip to and from a termserver on either end and connect to a local serial port from that term server to the pix. IE. PIX1serial to TS1--ethernet-TS2---serial to pix2 Remember for failover to take place though you still have to have an ethernet connection between the two, and for stateful failover it must be full duplex. -Patrick RB Jsn Eggert Gupmundsson 07/09/01 11:18AM Is there any way to create failover between PIXes over longer distance than the max limit of the failover cable (modified RS-232). I am thinking of connecting two houses. The distanse between them is around 2 kilometers. There is an Gb Ethernet optical cable between them that I can use if the PIX supports it. I have looked on the CCO but have not seen any article about this. Regards Jon Eggert Gudmundsson Network Administrator Icelandic Banks Data Center Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=11472t=11468 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Failover distance between two PIXes [7:11468]
Hehe...if you figure it out let me know. Are you going to have the inside outside line running parallel in both houses or are you talking about using a different outside line for the failover unit? You could have both active just use something to route/split traffic where both are live...but maybe that doesn't fit the scenario you're trying to resolve. Having both live leaves you with the problem of incoming traffic not using both. I'm not 100% sure...maybe more like 95%...but I don't think the failover cable would work unless there's some kind of repeater that could be used for that. Allen - Original Message - From: RB Jsn Eggert Gupmundsson To: Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 10:18 AM Subject: Failover distance between two PIXes [7:11468] Is there any way to create failover between PIXes over longer distance than the max limit of the failover cable (modified RS-232). I am thinking of connecting two houses. The distanse between them is around 2 kilometers. There is an Gb Ethernet optical cable between them that I can use if the PIX supports it. I have looked on the CCO but have not seen any article about this. Regards Jon Eggert Gudmundsson Network Administrator Icelandic Banks Data Center Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=11474t=11468 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Failover distance between two PIXes [7:11468]
quite simply, you need to upgrade the positronic quasitator on the motherboard of your packet-dropping device. this will allow the electron flows to migrate from the electro-channeling device over the flex-capacitor to a lambda on the quanta-channeling circuit. -Peter Slow -Original Message- From: Patrick Ramsey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 11:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Failover distance between two PIXes [7:11468] Without the serial cable, there is no way to keep the configs updated on both machines. The ethernet cables are actualy what control failover. In theory, you could run ip to and from a termserver on either end and connect to a local serial port from that term server to the pix. IE. PIX1serial to TS1--ethernet-TS2---serial to pix2 Remember for failover to take place though you still have to have an ethernet connection between the two, and for stateful failover it must be full duplex. -Patrick RB Jsn Eggert Gupmundsson 07/09/01 11:18AM Is there any way to create failover between PIXes over longer distance than the max limit of the failover cable (modified RS-232). I am thinking of connecting two houses. The distanse between them is around 2 kilometers. There is an Gb Ethernet optical cable between them that I can use if the PIX supports it. I have looked on the CCO but have not seen any article about this. Regards Jon Eggert Gudmundsson Network Administrator Icelandic Banks Data Center Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=11482t=11468 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Failover distance between two PIXes [7:11468]
What planet are you from PIX flux capacitors have had anti negative-induction protection since 4.47 (and who can't remember the fabled matter-anti-matter bug of 4.45)... Sheesh.. -Original Message- From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 9:29 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Failover distance between two PIXes [7:11468] But beware...if you upgrade using a non-Cisco positronic quasitator, you run the risk of creating a negative induction through the flux capacitor which will result in inverted backpressure toward the source. This has the effect of cancelling out the signal or at least reducing it to the point where you can never achieve failover. Besides, it voids your warranty. regards, John (who must not have enough work to do!) Peter Slow 7/9/01 10:09:31 AM quite simply, you need to upgrade the positronic quasitator on the motherboard of your packet-dropping device. this will allow the electron flows to migrate from the electro-channeling device over the flex-capacitor to a lambda on the quanta-channeling circuit. -Peter Slow -Original Message- From: Patrick Ramsey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 11:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Failover distance between two PIXes [7:11468] Without the serial cable, there is no way to keep the configs updated on both machines. The ethernet cables are actualy what control failover. In theory, you could run ip to and from a termserver on either end and connect to a local serial port from that term server to the pix. IE. PIX1serial to TS1--ethernet-TS2---serial to pix2 Remember for failover to take place though you still have to have an ethernet connection between the two, and for stateful failover it must be full duplex. -Patrick RB Jsn Eggert Gupmundsson 07/09/01 11:18AM Is there any way to create failover between PIXes over longer distance than the max limit of the failover cable (modified RS-232). I am thinking of connecting two houses. The distanse between them is around 2 kilometers. There is an Gb Ethernet optical cable between them that I can use if the PIX supports it. I have looked on the CCO but have not seen any article about this. Regards Jon Eggert Gudmundsson Network Administrator Icelandic Banks Data Center Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=11501t=11468 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Failover distance between two PIXes [7:11468]
Put more water in it and drink it slower chaps! After all you would not want to be mistaken for Klingons would you! Has the silly season arrived early in the US! K - Original Message - From: Bob Johnson To: Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 5:57 PM Subject: RE: Failover distance between two PIXes [7:11468] What planet are you from PIX flux capacitors have had anti negative-induction protection since 4.47 (and who can't remember the fabled matter-anti-matter bug of 4.45)... Sheesh.. -Original Message- From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 9:29 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Failover distance between two PIXes [7:11468] But beware...if you upgrade using a non-Cisco positronic quasitator, you run the risk of creating a negative induction through the flux capacitor which will result in inverted backpressure toward the source. This has the effect of cancelling out the signal or at least reducing it to the point where you can never achieve failover. Besides, it voids your warranty. regards, John (who must not have enough work to do!) Peter Slow 7/9/01 10:09:31 AM quite simply, you need to upgrade the positronic quasitator on the motherboard of your packet-dropping device. this will allow the electron flows to migrate from the electro-channeling device over the flex-capacitor to a lambda on the quanta-channeling circuit. -Peter Slow -Original Message- From: Patrick Ramsey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 11:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Failover distance between two PIXes [7:11468] Without the serial cable, there is no way to keep the configs updated on both machines. The ethernet cables are actualy what control failover. In theory, you could run ip to and from a termserver on either end and connect to a local serial port from that term server to the pix. IE. PIX1serial to TS1--ethernet-TS2---serial to pix2 Remember for failover to take place though you still have to have an ethernet connection between the two, and for stateful failover it must be full duplex. -Patrick RB Jsn Eggert Gupmundsson 07/09/01 11:18AM Is there any way to create failover between PIXes over longer distance than the max limit of the failover cable (modified RS-232). I am thinking of connecting two houses. The distanse between them is around 2 kilometers. There is an Gb Ethernet optical cable between them that I can use if the PIX supports it. I have looked on the CCO but have not seen any article about this. Regards Jon Eggert Gudmundsson Network Administrator Icelandic Banks Data Center Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=11504t=11468 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Failover distance between two PIXes [7:11468]
NO NO NO! everyone knows you look beside the brush protectors and plug it in the multi-amp SEL-2701 ethernet processor so that it can handle the 1.2 Gigawatts or current. Man, buy em books, send em to school.: -Original Message- From: Allen May [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 1:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Failover distance between two PIXes [7:11468] Guys I ripped my PIX apart and CANNOT find the flux capacitor. I hooked up a lightning rod to it just in case. Does it go into the power supply or do I hook straight into the motherboard? Allen - Original Message - From: Bob Johnson To: Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 11:57 AM Subject: RE: Failover distance between two PIXes [7:11468] What planet are you from PIX flux capacitors have had anti negative-induction protection since 4.47 (and who can't remember the fabled matter-anti-matter bug of 4.45)... Sheesh.. -Original Message- From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 9:29 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Failover distance between two PIXes [7:11468] But beware...if you upgrade using a non-Cisco positronic quasitator, you run the risk of creating a negative induction through the flux capacitor which will result in inverted backpressure toward the source. This has the effect of cancelling out the signal or at least reducing it to the point where you can never achieve failover. Besides, it voids your warranty. regards, John (who must not have enough work to do!) Peter Slow 7/9/01 10:09:31 AM quite simply, you need to upgrade the positronic quasitator on the motherboard of your packet-dropping device. this will allow the electron flows to migrate from the electro-channeling device over the flex-capacitor to a lambda on the quanta-channeling circuit. -Peter Slow -Original Message- From: Patrick Ramsey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 11:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Failover distance between two PIXes [7:11468] Without the serial cable, there is no way to keep the configs updated on both machines. The ethernet cables are actualy what control failover. In theory, you could run ip to and from a termserver on either end and connect to a local serial port from that term server to the pix. IE. PIX1serial to TS1--ethernet-TS2---serial to pix2 Remember for failover to take place though you still have to have an ethernet connection between the two, and for stateful failover it must be full duplex. -Patrick RB Jsn Eggert Gupmundsson 07/09/01 11:18AM Is there any way to create failover between PIXes over longer distance than the max limit of the failover cable (modified RS-232). I am thinking of connecting two houses. The distanse between them is around 2 kilometers. There is an Gb Ethernet optical cable between them that I can use if the PIX supports it. I have looked on the CCO but have not seen any article about this. Regards Jon Eggert Gudmundsson Network Administrator Icelandic Banks Data Center Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=11553t=11468 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
