Re: Switch port failure on 3548 [7:15089]

2001-08-07 Thread Mike Mandulak

The only way I can think that it would be a cable problem is if there was a
short in the wire somewhere. Unplug the CAT5 from the suspect port, do a
shut/no shut do you get the same result? Better still plug a PC into the
port, does it stay up/up? Then plug a PC in another port with an FTP server
on it and do some file transfers, then check for errors.

MikeM

- Original Message -
From: "Hans Stout" 
To: 
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 7:51 AM
Subject: Switch port failure on 3548 [7:15089]


> Hello colleagues,
>
> I have a Cisco 3548 switch and I suspect that one of the switch ports is
not
> working. All 48 ports have a CAT5 cable connection, and all ports are
> patched to the respective wall outlets, there are no active users yet, so
> all the ports are down/down. When I do a shut/no shut on all the ports, I
> can see in the log that all ports except one show that the port goes up
and
> then down. To my best knowledge, the fact that the port goes up/down after
a
> shut/no shut shows that the port is ok. The port that doesn't work goes
down
> right away. My question is: does this mean that the actual physical switch
> port is defective, or that the CAT5 cable attached to the switch isn't
> working, or that something on the path from the switch port to the wall
> outlet isn't working ?
> Thanks for your help in advance !
>
> Regards,
> Hans
>
> _
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=15094&t=15089
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Switch port failure on 3548 [7:15089]

2001-08-07 Thread Hans Stout

Mike,

thanks for your reply. The problem is that the switch is physically very far 
away; I just want know if a shut/no shut that is not followed by an up/down 
of the port inidcates that there is some sort of the problem with the switch 
port or the cabling.
Thanks again in advance for your help.

Regards,
Hans


>From: Mike Mandulak 
>To: Hans Stout , [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Switch port failure on 3548 [7:15089]
>Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2001 07:44:33 -0400
>
>The only way I can think that it would be a cable problem is if there was a
>short in the wire somewhere. Unplug the CAT5 from the suspect port, do a
>shut/no shut do you get the same result? Better still plug a PC into the
>port, does it stay up/up? Then plug a PC in another port with an FTP server
>on it and do some file transfers, then check for errors.
>
>MikeM
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Hans Stout" 
>To: 
>Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 7:51 AM
>Subject: Switch port failure on 3548 [7:15089]
>
>
> > Hello colleagues,
> >
> > I have a Cisco 3548 switch and I suspect that one of the switch ports is
>not
> > working. All 48 ports have a CAT5 cable connection, and all ports are
> > patched to the respective wall outlets, there are no active users yet, 
>so
> > all the ports are down/down. When I do a shut/no shut on all the ports, 
>I
> > can see in the log that all ports except one show that the port goes up
>and
> > then down. To my best knowledge, the fact that the port goes up/down 
>after
>a
> > shut/no shut shows that the port is ok. The port that doesn't work goes
>down
> > right away. My question is: does this mean that the actual physical 
>switch
> > port is defective, or that the CAT5 cable attached to the switch isn't
> > working, or that something on the path from the switch port to the wall
> > outlet isn't working ?
> > Thanks for your help in advance !
> >
> > Regards,
> > Hans
> >
> > _
> > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at 
>http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=15098&t=15089
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Switch port failure on 3548 [7:15089]

2001-08-07 Thread Michael

Herr Stout,
 
Another easy way of determining if the problem is with the port or the
cable would be to plug both ends of the cat 5 cable(s) into a cable
tester.  The manner Mike proposes is legit but I would want to
positively know that all pairs are 100%. Once you certify the cable as
being good, then the port would probably be the problem.  Hopefully it
will be the cable...helluva lot cheaper!
 
-Michael Vaughan
Senior Network Engineer
Predator-Hunter.com Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

-Original Message- 
From: Mike Mandulak 
Sent: Tue 8/7/2001 8:52 AM 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Cc: 
Subject: Re: Switch port failure on 3548 [7:15089]



The only way I can think that it would be a cable problem is if
there was a
short in the wire somewhere. Unplug the CAT5 from the suspect
port, do a
shut/no shut do you get the same result? Better still plug a PC
into the
port, does it stay up/up? Then plug a PC in another port with an
FTP server
on it and do some file transfers, then check for errors.

MikeM

- Original Message -
From: "Hans Stout"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 7:51 AM
Subject: Switch port failure on 3548 [7:15089]


> Hello colleagues,
>
> I have a Cisco 3548 switch and I suspect that one of the
switch ports is
not
> working. All 48 ports have a CAT5 cable connection, and all
ports are
> patched to the respective wall outlets, there are no active
users yet, so
> all the ports are down/down. When I do a shut/no shut on all
the ports, I
> can see in the log that all ports except one show that the
port goes up
and
> then down. To my best knowledge, the fact that the port goes
up/down after
a
> shut/no shut shows that the port is ok. The port that doesn't
work goes
down
> right away. My question is: does this mean that the actual
physical switch
> port is defective, or that the CAT5 cable attached to the
switch isn't
> working, or that something on the path from the switch port to
the wall
> outlet isn't working ?
> Thanks for your help in advance !
>
> Regards,
> Hans
>
>
_
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=15100&t=15089
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Switch port failure on 3548 [7:15089]

2001-08-07 Thread Mike Mandulak

Agreed, that would be the best method but as Hans said in a later message
the switch is physicaly very far away. Hans if you can get someone who is
onsite to unplug the CAT5 and do a shut/no shut you can see if the behavior
changes. Otherwise it sounds like a road trip is in order.

- Original Message -
From: "Michael" 
To: "Mike Mandulak" ; 
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 9:19 AM
Subject: RE: Switch port failure on 3548 [7:15089]


> Herr Stout,
>
> Another easy way of determining if the problem is with the port or the
> cable would be to plug both ends of the cat 5 cable(s) into a cable
> tester.  The manner Mike proposes is legit but I would want to
> positively know that all pairs are 100%. Once you certify the cable as
> being good, then the port would probably be the problem.  Hopefully it
> will be the cable...helluva lot cheaper!
>
> -Michael Vaughan
> Senior Network Engineer
> Predator-Hunter.com Inc.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Mandulak
> Sent: Tue 8/7/2001 8:52 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: Switch port failure on 3548 [7:15089]
>
>
>
> The only way I can think that it would be a cable problem is if
> there was a
> short in the wire somewhere. Unplug the CAT5 from the suspect
> port, do a
> shut/no shut do you get the same result? Better still plug a PC
> into the
> port, does it stay up/up? Then plug a PC in another port with an
> FTP server
> on it and do some file transfers, then check for errors.
>
> MikeM
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Hans Stout"
> To:
> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 7:51 AM
> Subject: Switch port failure on 3548 [7:15089]
>
>
> > Hello colleagues,
> >
> > I have a Cisco 3548 switch and I suspect that one of the
> switch ports is
> not
> > working. All 48 ports have a CAT5 cable connection, and all
> ports are
> > patched to the respective wall outlets, there are no active
> users yet, so
> > all the ports are down/down. When I do a shut/no shut on all
> the ports, I
> > can see in the log that all ports except one show that the
> port goes up
> and
> > then down. To my best knowledge, the fact that the port goes
> up/down after
> a
> > shut/no shut shows that the port is ok. The port that doesn't
> work goes
> down
> > right away. My question is: does this mean that the actual
> physical switch
> > port is defective, or that the CAT5 cable attached to the
> switch isn't
> > working, or that something on the path from the switch port to
> the wall
> > outlet isn't working ?
> > Thanks for your help in advance !
> >
> > Regards,
> > Hans
> >
> >
> _
> > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
> http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=15101&t=15089
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Switch port failure on 3548 [7:15089]

2001-08-07 Thread Hans Stout

Hi Mike,

thanks for your answer. Does that mean that if a shut/no shut doesn't result 
in an up/down, there definitely IS a problem with either the cabling OR the 
switch port ? For now that is all I need to know...
Thanks for your help in advance.

Regards,

Hans


>From: "Michael" 
>Reply-To: "Michael" 
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: Switch port failure on 3548 [7:15089]
>Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2001 09:27:36 -0400
>
>Herr Stout,
>
>Another easy way of determining if the problem is with the port or the
>cable would be to plug both ends of the cat 5 cable(s) into a cable
>tester.  The manner Mike proposes is legit but I would want to
>positively know that all pairs are 100%. Once you certify the cable as
>being good, then the port would probably be the problem.  Hopefully it
>will be the cable...helluva lot cheaper!
>
>-Michael Vaughan
>Senior Network Engineer
>Predator-Hunter.com Inc.
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>   -Original Message-
>   From: Mike Mandulak
>   Sent: Tue 8/7/2001 8:52 AM
>   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   Cc:
>   Subject: Re: Switch port failure on 3548 [7:15089]
>
>
>
>   The only way I can think that it would be a cable problem is if
>there was a
>   short in the wire somewhere. Unplug the CAT5 from the suspect
>port, do a
>   shut/no shut do you get the same result? Better still plug a PC
>into the
>   port, does it stay up/up? Then plug a PC in another port with an
>FTP server
>   on it and do some file transfers, then check for errors.
>
>   MikeM
>
>   - Original Message -
>   From: "Hans Stout"
>   To:
>   Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 7:51 AM
>   Subject: Switch port failure on 3548 [7:15089]
>
>
>   > Hello colleagues,
>   >
>   > I have a Cisco 3548 switch and I suspect that one of the
>switch ports is
>   not
>   > working. All 48 ports have a CAT5 cable connection, and all
>ports are
>   > patched to the respective wall outlets, there are no active
>users yet, so
>   > all the ports are down/down. When I do a shut/no shut on all
>the ports, I
>   > can see in the log that all ports except one show that the
>port goes up
>   and
>   > then down. To my best knowledge, the fact that the port goes
>up/down after
>   a
>   > shut/no shut shows that the port is ok. The port that doesn't
>work goes
>   down
>   > right away. My question is: does this mean that the actual
>physical switch
>   > port is defective, or that the CAT5 cable attached to the
>switch isn't
>   > working, or that something on the path from the switch port to
>the wall
>   > outlet isn't working ?
>   > Thanks for your help in advance !
>   >
>   > Regards,
>   > Hans
>   >
>   >
>_
>   > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
>http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=15106&t=15089
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Switch port failure on 3548 [7:15089]

2001-08-07 Thread Thad Gaston

Hans,

The easiest way to troubleshoot this is issue is by connecting a "Known
Good" laptop/desktop directly into the switch port. I would also suggest
enabling portfast on the switch ports connecting to host stations (ie
workstation, servers, and printers). 

Regards

-Original Message-
From: Hans Stout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 7:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Switch port failure on 3548 [7:15089]


Hello colleagues,

I have a Cisco 3548 switch and I suspect that one of the switch ports is
not 
working. All 48 ports have a CAT5 cable connection, and all ports are 
patched to the respective wall outlets, there are no active users yet,
so 
all the ports are down/down. When I do a shut/no shut on all the ports,
I 
can see in the log that all ports except one show that the port goes up
and 
then down. To my best knowledge, the fact that the port goes up/down
after a 
shut/no shut shows that the port is ok. The port that doesn't work goes
down 
right away. My question is: does this mean that the actual physical
switch 
port is defective, or that the CAT5 cable attached to the switch isn't 
working, or that something on the path from the switch port to the wall 
outlet isn't working ?
Thanks for your help in advance !

Regards,
Hans

_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=15114&t=15089
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]