RE: keepalive set in frame-relay circuit?

2000-10-12 Thread Stull, Cory

I'm not sure what setting the frame-relay keepalive to 0 would do.  If your
router wasn't receiving LMI to begin with than you are probably getting a
false line protocol up reading.  LMI is needed so that the frame-switch can
tell the router the status of the pvc's and dlci's on that circuit.  If the
switch and router aren't talking then the router probably doesn't know about
the PVCs it has to get to remote locations...

Hope I didn't get off track I just skimmed your question.

Cory

-Original Message-
From: Yee, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 1:57 AM
To: 'Flem'; cisco@groupstudy. com (E-mail)
Subject: RE: keepalive set in frame-relay circuit?


can't catch what you are trying to say 
Jason

-Original Message-
From: Flem [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 2:48 PM
To: Yee, Jason; cisco@groupstudy. com (E-mail)
Subject: Re: keepalive set in frame-relay circuit?


Yee ,

inline .

--- "Yee, Jason" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 hi anyone 
 
 knows why after having set my keepalive to be zero
 my frame-relay circuit
 straight away went up ie line protocol is up
 
 I believe there is no need to set keepalive as the
 LMI is taking care of it
 right?

Keep-alives on a frame-relay interface implements LMI 
on that interface .
( do sh int ser#/# and look for the LMI settings )

flem

 
 Correct me if I am wrong
 
 thanks
 
 Jason
 
 **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more
 information go to
 http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
 _
 UPDATED Posting Guidelines:
 http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
 http://www.groupstudy.com
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Photos - 35mm Quality Prints, Now Get 15 Free!
http://photos.yahoo.com/

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: keepalive set in frame-relay circuit?

2000-10-12 Thread Yee, Jason

thanks

-Original Message-
From: Stull, Cory [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2000 11:05 PM
To: Yee, Jason; 'Flem'; cisco@groupstudy. com (E-mail)
Subject: RE: keepalive set in frame-relay circuit?


I'm not sure what setting the frame-relay keepalive to 0 would do.  If your
router wasn't receiving LMI to begin with than you are probably getting a
false line protocol up reading.  LMI is needed so that the frame-switch can
tell the router the status of the pvc's and dlci's on that circuit.  If the
switch and router aren't talking then the router probably doesn't know about
the PVCs it has to get to remote locations...

Hope I didn't get off track I just skimmed your question.

Cory

-Original Message-
From: Yee, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 1:57 AM
To: 'Flem'; cisco@groupstudy. com (E-mail)
Subject: RE: keepalive set in frame-relay circuit?


can't catch what you are trying to say 
Jason

-Original Message-
From: Flem [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 2:48 PM
To: Yee, Jason; cisco@groupstudy. com (E-mail)
Subject: Re: keepalive set in frame-relay circuit?


Yee ,

inline .

--- "Yee, Jason" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 hi anyone 
 
 knows why after having set my keepalive to be zero
 my frame-relay circuit
 straight away went up ie line protocol is up
 
 I believe there is no need to set keepalive as the
 LMI is taking care of it
 right?

Keep-alives on a frame-relay interface implements LMI 
on that interface .
( do sh int ser#/# and look for the LMI settings )

flem

 
 Correct me if I am wrong
 
 thanks
 
 Jason
 
 **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more
 information go to
 http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
 _
 UPDATED Posting Guidelines:
 http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
 http://www.groupstudy.com
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Photos - 35mm Quality Prints, Now Get 15 Free!
http://photos.yahoo.com/

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: keepalive set in frame-relay circuit?

2000-10-10 Thread Yee, Jason

it's a receive-only dish 

the customer has a terrestrial link for the return path

Jason

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Jay Hennigan
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 11:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: keepalive set in frame-relay circuit?


On 9 Oct 2000 22:50:50 -0400, Yee, Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:this interface is connected to a comstream modem (satellite modem) then out
:as a satellite link to frame-relay switch

Check with Comstream.  Do they specify frame-relay encapsulation? 

When you say "modem", is it a regular RS-232 modem?  Is the satellite 
two-way to you?  Is it a VSAT and you're transmitting to the bird, or
is it a receive-only dish and you're using dial-up for the return path? 

Is it an asynchronous modem?

Have you tried "encapsulation frame-relay IETF" on the interface?  

It sounds as if you really need to get some specifics from the satellite
carrier as to exactly what interface configuration they expect.

:On 9 Oct 2000 20:58:12 -0400, Yee, Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
::if that is the case setting keepalives to what value is optimal?
::
::10 , I tried setting it to 10 but it went down 
:
:To what, if anything, is this interface physically connected? 

-- 
Jay Hennigan  -  Network Administration  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
NetLojix Communications, Inc.  NASDAQ: NETX  -  http://www.netlojix.com/
WestNet:  Connecting you to the planet.  805 884-6323 

**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
_
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
_
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: keepalive set in frame-relay circuit?

2000-10-10 Thread Yee, Jason

thank you very much your explanation is crystal clear

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 1:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: keepalive set in frame-relay circuit?




10 seconds is the default, and should generally be fine.  Your circuit is
probably down for some other reason.

Is this a test setup, with the routers connected back-to back (or with
another
cisco as a switch), or is the frame relay circuit a 'real' circuit from a
telco?
Assuming it's a real circuit, try the 'show frame lmi' command.  Your 'num
status enq. sent' and 'num status msgs recv' values should be the same (or
very
similar), and non-zero.  If they aren't the same, clear the counters, wait a
minute or so, and check again.
If you are not receiving any LMI messages, then you're not talking to the
frame
relay switch.  This is not a good thing.  Either your router config is wrong
(wrong encapsulation?  wrong lmi type? could be a few things) or the telco
service is broken (or dud hardware, potentially).
If the LMI looks OK, try the command 'show frame pvc', or turn on term mon
and
do a 'debug frame lmi' (it's a fairly safe debug to do even in a production
environment, unless your routers are very overloaded or you have zillions of
PVCs.  But I take no responsibility if it breaks your network :-).  See what
PVCs are defined, and which ones the telco knows about.  See if they match
what
you think they should be.
With the debug frame lmi command, you will see (hopefully) LMI messages
coming
from the switch.  Check that they're coming in every ten seconds.  If not,
change your keepalive to match.  Every now and again (every minute on mine,
YMMV) the LMI message will include the status of all the PVCs the switch
knows
about, and their status (I believe the exact format of the messages varies
between frame switch types.  On mine, an active PVC has status 0x2, and an
inactive one has status 0x0).

Even if you force the interface up/up by fiddling with the keepalives, it
won't
pass any data if the circuit's broken.

JMcL


-- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 10/10/2000
04:33 pm
---


"Yee, Jason" [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 10/10/2000 11:49:45 am

Please respond to "Yee, Jason" [EMAIL PROTECTED]


To:   "'Jay Hennigan'" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:    (bcc: JENNY MCLEOD/NSO/CSDA)
Subject:  RE: keepalive set in frame-relay circuit?



if that is the case setting keepalives to what value is optimal?

10 , I tried setting it to 10 but it went down

Jason

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Jay Hennigan
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 5:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: keepalive set in frame-relay circuit?


On 9 Oct 2000 01:54:14 -0400, Yee, Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:hi anyone
:
:knows why after having set my keepalive to be zero my frame-relay circuit
:straight away went up ie line protocol is up

The keepalive setting on a frame-relay interface determines the LMI
interval.
Turning it off stops the router from sending or expecting LMI.

:I believe there is no need to set keepalive as the LMI is taking care of it
:right?

The keepalive of an interface with frame-relay encapsulation _is_ LMI.

:Correct me if I am wrong

Can you pass traffic over the interface with no keepalive?  No keepalive
is a means of forcing an interface into an up-up state from the router's
viewpoint even if the interface may in fact be disconnected.  While this
is useful for test purposes, it doesn't carry any traffic.  While the
interface shows "line protocol is up" with or without anything plugged in
it isn't going to move data from point A to point B.

If it _is_ connected, and the other end also is set to "no keepalive",
then in most cases you can use it to pass data.  However, this is not
usually a good idea because the routers will have no means of detecting
a link failure (other than timeouts on a dynamic routing protocol).

If this frame-relay interface is connected to a real carrier's frame
switch, then the "no keepalive" will cause the router to stop sending
LMI, which will cause the carrier's switch to show the link as inactive.

You may be able to make it work in a lab situation with no keepalive
on a router configured as a frame switch, but it isn't a good idea.

As a rule, keepalives are a good thing on an active interface passing
real-world traffic, and turning them off should not be necessary to
bring the line protocol up.

--
Jay Hennigan  -  Network Administration  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NetLojix Communications, Inc.  NASDAQ: NETX  -  http://www.netlojix.com/
WestNet:  Connecting you to the planet.  805 884-6323

**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.h

RE: keepalive set in frame-relay circuit?

2000-10-09 Thread Yee, Jason

can't catch what you are trying to say 
Jason

-Original Message-
From: Flem [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 2:48 PM
To: Yee, Jason; cisco@groupstudy. com (E-mail)
Subject: Re: keepalive set in frame-relay circuit?


Yee ,

inline .

--- "Yee, Jason" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 hi anyone 
 
 knows why after having set my keepalive to be zero
 my frame-relay circuit
 straight away went up ie line protocol is up
 
 I believe there is no need to set keepalive as the
 LMI is taking care of it
 right?

Keep-alives on a frame-relay interface implements LMI 
on that interface .
( do sh int ser#/# and look for the LMI settings )

flem

 
 Correct me if I am wrong
 
 thanks
 
 Jason
 
 **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more
 information go to
 http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
 _
 UPDATED Posting Guidelines:
 http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
 http://www.groupstudy.com
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Photos - 35mm Quality Prints, Now Get 15 Free!
http://photos.yahoo.com/

**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
_
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [keepalive set in frame-relay circuit?]

2000-10-09 Thread fathar

Yeahh,,

Thats 100 % Right

Faisal.

"Yee, Jason" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi anyone 

knows why after having set my keepalive to be zero my frame-relay circuit
straight away went up ie line protocol is up

I believe there is no need to set keepalive as the LMI is taking care of it
right?

Correct me if I am wrong

thanks

Jason

**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
_
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1

**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
_
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: keepalive set in frame-relay circuit?

2000-10-09 Thread Flem

Yee ,

inline .

--- "Yee, Jason" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 hi anyone 
 
 knows why after having set my keepalive to be zero
 my frame-relay circuit
 straight away went up ie line protocol is up
 
 I believe there is no need to set keepalive as the
 LMI is taking care of it
 right?

Keep-alives on a frame-relay interface implements LMI 
on that interface .
( do sh int ser#/# and look for the LMI settings )

flem

 
 Correct me if I am wrong
 
 thanks
 
 Jason
 
 **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more
 information go to
 http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
 _
 UPDATED Posting Guidelines:
 http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
 http://www.groupstudy.com
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Photos - 35mm Quality Prints, Now Get 15 Free!
http://photos.yahoo.com/

**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
_
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: keepalive set in frame-relay circuit?

2000-10-09 Thread Jay Hennigan

On 9 Oct 2000 01:54:14 -0400, Yee, Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:hi anyone 
:
:knows why after having set my keepalive to be zero my frame-relay circuit
:straight away went up ie line protocol is up

The keepalive setting on a frame-relay interface determines the LMI interval.
Turning it off stops the router from sending or expecting LMI.

:I believe there is no need to set keepalive as the LMI is taking care of it
:right?

The keepalive of an interface with frame-relay encapsulation _is_ LMI.  

:Correct me if I am wrong

Can you pass traffic over the interface with no keepalive?  No keepalive 
is a means of forcing an interface into an up-up state from the router's 
viewpoint even if the interface may in fact be disconnected.  While this
is useful for test purposes, it doesn't carry any traffic.  While the 
interface shows "line protocol is up" with or without anything plugged in 
it isn't going to move data from point A to point B.  

If it _is_ connected, and the other end also is set to "no keepalive", 
then in most cases you can use it to pass data.  However, this is not 
usually a good idea because the routers will have no means of detecting
a link failure (other than timeouts on a dynamic routing protocol). 

If this frame-relay interface is connected to a real carrier's frame 
switch, then the "no keepalive" will cause the router to stop sending 
LMI, which will cause the carrier's switch to show the link as inactive. 

You may be able to make it work in a lab situation with no keepalive 
on a router configured as a frame switch, but it isn't a good idea. 

As a rule, keepalives are a good thing on an active interface passing 
real-world traffic, and turning them off should not be necessary to
bring the line protocol up. 

-- 
Jay Hennigan  -  Network Administration  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
NetLojix Communications, Inc.  NASDAQ: NETX  -  http://www.netlojix.com/
WestNet:  Connecting you to the planet.  805 884-6323 

**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
_
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: keepalive set in frame-relay circuit?

2000-10-09 Thread Yee, Jason

if that is the case setting keepalives to what value is optimal?

10 , I tried setting it to 10 but it went down 

Jason

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Jay Hennigan
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 5:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: keepalive set in frame-relay circuit?


On 9 Oct 2000 01:54:14 -0400, Yee, Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:hi anyone 
:
:knows why after having set my keepalive to be zero my frame-relay circuit
:straight away went up ie line protocol is up

The keepalive setting on a frame-relay interface determines the LMI
interval.
Turning it off stops the router from sending or expecting LMI.

:I believe there is no need to set keepalive as the LMI is taking care of it
:right?

The keepalive of an interface with frame-relay encapsulation _is_ LMI.  

:Correct me if I am wrong

Can you pass traffic over the interface with no keepalive?  No keepalive 
is a means of forcing an interface into an up-up state from the router's 
viewpoint even if the interface may in fact be disconnected.  While this
is useful for test purposes, it doesn't carry any traffic.  While the 
interface shows "line protocol is up" with or without anything plugged in 
it isn't going to move data from point A to point B.  

If it _is_ connected, and the other end also is set to "no keepalive", 
then in most cases you can use it to pass data.  However, this is not 
usually a good idea because the routers will have no means of detecting
a link failure (other than timeouts on a dynamic routing protocol). 

If this frame-relay interface is connected to a real carrier's frame 
switch, then the "no keepalive" will cause the router to stop sending 
LMI, which will cause the carrier's switch to show the link as inactive. 

You may be able to make it work in a lab situation with no keepalive 
on a router configured as a frame switch, but it isn't a good idea. 

As a rule, keepalives are a good thing on an active interface passing 
real-world traffic, and turning them off should not be necessary to
bring the line protocol up. 

-- 
Jay Hennigan  -  Network Administration  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
NetLojix Communications, Inc.  NASDAQ: NETX  -  http://www.netlojix.com/
WestNet:  Connecting you to the planet.  805 884-6323 

**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
_
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
_
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: keepalive set in frame-relay circuit?

2000-10-09 Thread Yee, Jason

this interface is connected to a comstream modem (satellite modem) then out
as a satellite link to frame-relay switch

Jason

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Jay Hennigan
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 10:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: keepalive set in frame-relay circuit?


On 9 Oct 2000 20:58:12 -0400, Yee, Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:if that is the case setting keepalives to what value is optimal?
:
:10 , I tried setting it to 10 but it went down 

To what, if anything, is this interface physically connected? 

-- 
Jay Hennigan  -  Network Administration  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
NetLojix Communications, Inc.  NASDAQ: NETX  -  http://www.netlojix.com/
WestNet:  Connecting you to the planet.  805 884-6323 

**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
_
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
_
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]