Re: RFCs [7:71276]
"Major" in what sense? A great deal depends on the topic at hand. IP vs TCP/UDP, vs MPLS, vs addressing, etc. I personally use the RFC Editor pages' search function and get creative with keywords: http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcsearch.html Annlee ""rbx10 Defcom"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Anyone has a list of the major RFCs.. > I'm just trying to make sure I covered them > thanks > -rbx10 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71291&t=71276 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFCs [7:71276]
Don't know what major is to you but here you will find them: http://www.cis.ohio-state.edu/cs/Services/rfc/index.html Dave rbx10 Defcom wrote: > Anyone has a list of the major RFCs.. > I'm just trying to make sure I covered them > thanks > -rbx10 -- David Madland CCIE# 2016 Sr. Network Engineer Qwest Communications 612-664-3367 "Government can do something for the people only in proportion as it can do something to the people." -- Thomas Jefferson Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71294&t=71276 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RFCs [7:71276]
rbx10 Defcom wrote: > > Anyone has a list of the major RFCs.. > I'm just trying to make sure I covered them > thanks > -rbx10 I'm glad you asked that. :-) I did in fact recently compile a list of "must-read" RFCs. It is here: http://www.troubleshootingnetworks.com/rfcs.html Priscilla Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71308&t=71276 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFCs [7:71276]
""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message ... > I'm glad you asked that. :-) I did in fact recently compile a list of > "must-read" RFCs. It is here: I keep a private-list like this as well. I like to group them by functional importance to my line of work... e.g. NOC/Contact-related, IP/ASN-related, DNS-related, ISP-Backbone, BGP, Security, NAT, IPSec, NMS, Testing, etc... if you are interested in a particular category, let me know. I also include relevant internet-drafts (both expired and current) along with the RFC's. I find the internet-drafts to have the most historical and timely value, especially along with the STD, BCP, and FYI RFC's. This tool has been tremendously useful when acquiring this sort of information: http://www.dewn.com/rfc/ I believe there are other similar tools (e.g. rfcget) that accomplish the same. -dre Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71309&t=71276 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFCs [7:71276]
I like this one-- ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc3514.txt --note the date, and author. Annlee ""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > rbx10 Defcom wrote: > > > > Anyone has a list of the major RFCs.. > > I'm just trying to make sure I covered them > > thanks > > -rbx10 > > I'm glad you asked that. :-) I did in fact recently compile a list of > "must-read" RFCs. It is here: > > http://www.troubleshootingnetworks.com/rfcs.html > > Priscilla Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71311&t=71276 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFCs [7:71276]
Thank you all !!! I really appreciated. Annlee, I meant "major" which relate to the important ones for the ccie written. -rbx10 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71344&t=71276 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFCs [7:71276]
rbx10 Defcom wrote: > > Thank you all !!! > I really appreciated. > Annlee, I meant "major" which relate to the important ones for > the ccie written. You don't have to know any RFCs for CCIE!? I've talked to quite a few CCIEs who don't even know how TCP works. Afterall it's just payload in a packet that a router forwards. I liked dre's comment about grouping them by category. My list is focused on understanding protocol behavior for the fundamental protocols found on enterprise networks. There are many other categories. Hey, what other subject can we beat to death today! :-) I know I for one have been procrastinating due to a horrid project I'm working on. :-) How far away is the 4th of July, next day off??? Priscilla > > -rbx10 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71362&t=71276 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFCs [7:71276]
At 5:01 PM + 6/25/03, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: >rbx10 Defcom wrote: >> >> Thank you all !!! >> I really appreciated. >> Annlee, I meant "major" which relate to the important ones for >> the ccie written. > >You don't have to know any RFCs for CCIE!? I've talked to quite a few CCIEs >who don't even know how TCP works. Afterall it's just payload in a packet >that a router forwards. But if you start getting into NAT and load balancers, it's essential knowledge. > >I liked dre's comment about grouping them by category. My list is focused on >understanding protocol behavior for the fundamental protocols found on >enterprise networks. There are many other categories. One natural way to characterize the ones that aren't fully stable is to review the drafts and RFCs by the IETF Working Group: http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/wg-dir.html Now, you won't find old and stable things there like basic IPv4. You may also find exceptionally valuable drafts. For example, the current draft 20 of the revision to the BGP specification, RFC 1771, is a far better picture of real-world BGP than is 1771. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71368&t=71276 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]