Re: Routing protocol
You can redistribute static routes, which protocol do static routes use Duck - Original Message - From: lawrence sculark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2000 3:08 PM Subject: Re: Routing protocol > look up "redistribution"..it will set you on the right path...lawrence > > > >From: "Donald B Johnson Jr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: "Donald B Johnson Jr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Subject: Routing protocol > >Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2000 17:28:38 -0800 > >MIME-Version: 1.0 > >Received: from [208.32.175.78] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id > >MHotMailBBD3226D000AD820F3D2D020AF4E054A24; Wed Nov 08 14:47:10 2000 > >Received: from localhost (mail@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) > >with SMTP id RAA03962;Wed, 8 Nov 2000 17:43:24 -0500 > >Received: by groupstudy.com (bulk_mailer v1.12); Wed, 8 Nov 2000 17:36:22 > >-0500 > >Received: (from listserver@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id > >RAA01319GroupStudy Mailer; Wed, 8 Nov 2000 17:36:21 -0500 > >Received: from smtprelay3.abs.adelphia.net (smtprelay.abs.adelphia.net > >[64.8.20.11])by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id > >RAA01291GroupStudy Mailer; Wed, 8 Nov 2000 17:36:20 -0500 > >Received: from duck1 ([24.48.157.224]) by > >smtprelay3.abs.adelphia.net (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with > >SMTP id G3Q99500.J4L; Wed, 8 Nov 2000 17:31:53 -0500 > >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 08 14:48:01 2000 > >Message-ID: <02c801c04ab5$8f85f1f0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >X-Priority: 3 > >X-MSMail-Priority: Normal > >X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 > >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 > >Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Precedence: bulk > > > >I don't think this make sense. > >Routing protocols are used to maintain routing tables. > >Routed protocols are used for addressing and accessing stations on a > >network. > >The process of routing is the ability of a router being able to receive a > >packet, check the destination in the packet, look for a destination network > >in the route table and switch the packet to the appropriate interface that > >can reach the destination network. > >So routing is the process of: > >1. declaring a destination > >2. finding the destinaton > >3. switching the packet to an interface on the path to the destination. > >Many protocols are involved in this process from ARP to BGP or anything in > >between. > >Duck > > AVI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Can anyone tell me, Which is the only routing protocol to route other > >protocols > > Is it EIGRP or BGP > > Thanks > > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription > >info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and > >Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > > Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at > http://profiles.msn.com. > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Routing protocol
I dont think the original question made any sense. Duck - Original Message - From: Priscilla Oppenheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: lawrence sculark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2000 4:37 PM Subject: Re: Routing protocol > A bunch of different concepts are getting mixed up in this discussion. > Here's a quick note to clear the air. > > A routing protocol learns the path(s) to remote networks. Examples are > OSPF, RIP, EIGRP, BGP, RTMP, AURP, Novell RIP and NLSP, etc. > > EIGRP is a routing protocol that can handle routing for IP, AppleTalk, and > IPX. That makes it unique. It has a routing engine that can be used by each > of these protocol suites, as well as separate mechanisms to deal with > unique issues for each suite. > > This multiprotocol feature of EIGRP has nothing to do with redistribution. > Redistribution is the process whereby a routing protocol can learn routes > from some other routing protocol. For example, you can redistribute RIP > routes into OSPF. > > I don't know if this is what the responder had in mind, but by default, the > Cisco IOS software redistributes AppleTalk RTMP routes into AppleTalk > EIGRP, and vice versa. By default, the Cisco IOS software redistributes IPX > RIP routes into EIGRP, and vice versa. These are nice features for > companies that still run RTMP and IPX RIP on their LANs but have migrated > to the more efficient EIGRP on WANs. > > Cisco made up the silly term "routed protocol," and they use it somewhat > inconsistently. But in general, it means the network-layer protocol that > carries the payload that gets routed through the network. Examples include > IP, DDP, IPX, etc. > > A router has two jobs: > > 1) Participating in a routing protocol to learn paths > 2) Forwarding routed traffic (This is sometimes called switching, just to > confuse matters) > > OK, that's enough for now. > > Priscilla > > > At 03:08 PM 11/8/00, lawrence sculark wrote: > >look up "redistribution"..it will set you on the right path...lawrence > > > > > >>From: "Donald B Johnson Jr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>Reply-To: "Donald B Johnson Jr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>Subject: Routing protocol > >> > >>I don't think this make sense. > >>Routing protocols are used to maintain routing tables. > >>Routed protocols are used for addressing and accessing stations on a network. > >>The process of routing is the ability of a router being able to receive a > >>packet, check the destination in the packet, look for a destination > >>network in the route table and switch the packet to the appropriate > >>interface that can reach the destination network. > >>So routing is the process of: > >>1. declaring a destination > >>2. finding the destinaton > >>3. switching the packet to an interface on the path to the destination. > >>Many protocols are involved in this process from ARP to BGP or anything > >>in between. > >>Duck > >> AVI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > >> Can anyone tell me, Which is the only routing protocol to route other > >> protocols > >> Is it EIGRP or BGP > >> Thanks > >> _ FAQ, list archives, and > >> subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report > >> misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Priscilla Oppenheimer > http://www.priscilla.com > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Routing protocol
A bunch of different concepts are getting mixed up in this discussion. Here's a quick note to clear the air. A routing protocol learns the path(s) to remote networks. Examples are OSPF, RIP, EIGRP, BGP, RTMP, AURP, Novell RIP and NLSP, etc. EIGRP is a routing protocol that can handle routing for IP, AppleTalk, and IPX. That makes it unique. It has a routing engine that can be used by each of these protocol suites, as well as separate mechanisms to deal with unique issues for each suite. This multiprotocol feature of EIGRP has nothing to do with redistribution. Redistribution is the process whereby a routing protocol can learn routes from some other routing protocol. For example, you can redistribute RIP routes into OSPF. I don't know if this is what the responder had in mind, but by default, the Cisco IOS software redistributes AppleTalk RTMP routes into AppleTalk EIGRP, and vice versa. By default, the Cisco IOS software redistributes IPX RIP routes into EIGRP, and vice versa. These are nice features for companies that still run RTMP and IPX RIP on their LANs but have migrated to the more efficient EIGRP on WANs. Cisco made up the silly term "routed protocol," and they use it somewhat inconsistently. But in general, it means the network-layer protocol that carries the payload that gets routed through the network. Examples include IP, DDP, IPX, etc. A router has two jobs: 1) Participating in a routing protocol to learn paths 2) Forwarding routed traffic (This is sometimes called switching, just to confuse matters) OK, that's enough for now. Priscilla At 03:08 PM 11/8/00, lawrence sculark wrote: >look up "redistribution"..it will set you on the right path...lawrence > > >>From: "Donald B Johnson Jr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Reply-To: "Donald B Johnson Jr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Subject: Routing protocol >> >>I don't think this make sense. >>Routing protocols are used to maintain routing tables. >>Routed protocols are used for addressing and accessing stations on a network. >>The process of routing is the ability of a router being able to receive a >>packet, check the destination in the packet, look for a destination >>network in the route table and switch the packet to the appropriate >>interface that can reach the destination network. >>So routing is the process of: >>1. declaring a destination >>2. finding the destinaton >>3. switching the packet to an interface on the path to the destination. >>Many protocols are involved in this process from ARP to BGP or anything >>in between. >>Duck >> AVI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... >> Can anyone tell me, Which is the only routing protocol to route other >> protocols >> Is it EIGRP or BGP >> Thanks >> _ FAQ, list archives, and >> subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report >> misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Routing protocol
Actually EIGRP routes IP/IPX and AT. Or at least you can turn on EIGRP for each protocol using 3 different types of EIGRP. Further Multiprotocol BGP can route protocols outside of the IP domain as well though standard BGPv4 is purely an IP protocol. Even further, IS-IS will route both CLNP and IP *** REPLY SEPARATOR ***On 11/9/2000 at 5:28 PM Donald B Johnson Jr wrote: I don't think this make sense. Routing protocols are used to maintain routing tables. Routed protocols are used for addressing and accessing stations on a network. The process of routing is the ability of a router being able to receive a packet, check the destination in the packet, look for a destination network in the route table and switch the packet to the appropriate interface that can reach the destination network. So routing is the process of: 1. declaring a destination 2. finding the destinaton 3. switching the packet to an interface on the path to the destination. Many protocols are involved in this process from ARP to BGP or anything in between. Duck AVI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...Can anyone tell me, Which is the only routing protocol to route other protocols Is it EIGRP or BGP Thanks _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Routing protocol
look up "redistribution"..it will set you on the right path...lawrence >From: "Donald B Johnson Jr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "Donald B Johnson Jr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Routing protocol >Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2000 17:28:38 -0800 >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Received: from [208.32.175.78] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id >MHotMailBBD3226D000AD820F3D2D020AF4E054A24; Wed Nov 08 14:47:10 2000 >Received: from localhost (mail@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) >with SMTP id RAA03962;Wed, 8 Nov 2000 17:43:24 -0500 >Received: by groupstudy.com (bulk_mailer v1.12); Wed, 8 Nov 2000 17:36:22 >-0500 >Received: (from listserver@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id >RAA01319GroupStudy Mailer; Wed, 8 Nov 2000 17:36:21 -0500 >Received: from smtprelay3.abs.adelphia.net (smtprelay.abs.adelphia.net >[64.8.20.11])by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id >RAA01291GroupStudy Mailer; Wed, 8 Nov 2000 17:36:20 -0500 >Received: from duck1 ([24.48.157.224]) by >smtprelay3.abs.adelphia.net (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with >SMTP id G3Q99500.J4L; Wed, 8 Nov 2000 17:31:53 -0500 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 08 14:48:01 2000 >Message-ID: <02c801c04ab5$8f85f1f0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >X-Priority: 3 >X-MSMail-Priority: Normal >X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 >Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Precedence: bulk > >I don't think this make sense. >Routing protocols are used to maintain routing tables. >Routed protocols are used for addressing and accessing stations on a >network. >The process of routing is the ability of a router being able to receive a >packet, check the destination in the packet, look for a destination network >in the route table and switch the packet to the appropriate interface that >can reach the destination network. >So routing is the process of: >1. declaring a destination >2. finding the destinaton >3. switching the packet to an interface on the path to the destination. >Many protocols are involved in this process from ARP to BGP or anything in >between. >Duck > AVI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Can anyone tell me, Which is the only routing protocol to route other >protocols > Is it EIGRP or BGP > Thanks > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription >info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and >Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Routing Protocol
On Wed, 8 Nov 2000, Chris Lemagie wrote: > EIGRP will redistribute other routing protocols such as Novell IPX and > AppleTalk. BGP will not. ~~~ You mean "routed" protocols. -brian > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of AVI > Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2000 5:14 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Routing Protocol > > Can anyone tell me, Which is the only routing protocol to route other > protocols > Is it EIGRP or BGP > Thanks > > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and > Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --- Brian Feeny, CCNP, CCDP [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881) _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Routing Protocol
EIGRP will redistribute other routing protocols such as Novell IPX and AppleTalk. BGP will not. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of AVI Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2000 5:14 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Routing Protocol Can anyone tell me, Which is the only routing protocol to route other protocols Is it EIGRP or BGP Thanks _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Routing protocol timers
www.cisco.com - Original Message - From: . <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2000 4:35 PM Subject: Routing protocol timers > Hello Friends > > Could someone explain to me what happens when the invalid timer expires. > And what happens to the route between the invalid timer and flush time. > For eg in IGRP what happens to the route between 270 and 630 seconds > Thanks > > SV > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Routing Protocol Load-Sharing
Evan, at some point you might want to look beyond single circuits. An alternative might be to aggregate your bandwidth by having your carrier terminate it as ATM, and populate your routers with IMA cards to give you bandwidth. Fractional DS3 should be a lot less expensive and gives you a lot more room to grow. As you have now discovered, adding T-1s to solve bandwidth problems has its limits. The fact that you have 12 point to points between two sites tells me 1) that it's past time to look at this with fresh eyes, 2) your company must have too much money, and 3) your telco really loves you :-> OSPF is 4 equal cost paths. EIRP is 6, and the paths can be of unequal cost. Where are you located? Contact me off line. Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Evan You Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2000 6:49 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Routing Protocol Load-Sharing What is the maximum number of equal-path equal-cost load sharing / balancing will OSPF or EIGRP do? Basically, I have 12 T1 circuits that I am thinking of load-sharing between two Data Centers. I am either thinking of using a Larscom Orion 4000 IMUX to bundle the T1 into two groups and out into HSSI interfaces of the 7000 routers, or just simply hook-up all 12 T1 directly to the routers and have them load-share the links via routing protocols. But I am not certain if the second option will work. I know that the routers will be taxed more and the network overall will have several more routes to handle, but the advantage is that each link is completely redundant from each other. But more than anything, I am not sure if any routing protocols will handle 12 equal-path/equal-cost load-sharing and balancing. Thanks, Evan You - CCNA ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Routing Protocol Load-Sharing
I believe the no# is 6 Duck - Original Message - From: Evan You <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2000 6:48 AM Subject: Routing Protocol Load-Sharing > What is the maximum number of equal-path equal-cost load sharing / balancing > will OSPF or EIGRP do? > > Basically, I have 12 T1 circuits that I am thinking of load-sharing between > two Data Centers. I am either thinking of using a Larscom Orion 4000 IMUX to > bundle the T1 into two groups and out into HSSI interfaces of the 7000 > routers, or just simply hook-up all 12 T1 directly to the routers and have > them load-share the links via routing protocols. But I am not certain if the > second option will work. I know that the routers will be taxed more and the > network overall will have several more routes to handle, but the advantage > is that each link is completely redundant from each other. But more than > anything, I am not sure if any routing protocols will handle 12 > equal-path/equal-cost load-sharing and balancing. > > Thanks, > > Evan You - CCNA > > > > ___ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Routing Protocol Load-Sharing
Chuck, Thanks for the input. I agree with your logic. But part of the problem is that these are International circuits going from one country to another. And believe it or not, most of the time it's much cheaper to bundle several E1s or T1s together instead of getting a fractional T3 or E3 internationally (I know, I work for WorldCom). - Evan -Original Message- From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2000 11:02 AM To: Cisco Mail List; Evan You Subject: RE: Routing Protocol Load-Sharing Evan, at some point you might want to look beyond single circuits. An alternative might be to aggregate your bandwidth by having your carrier terminate it as ATM, and populate your routers with IMA cards to give you bandwidth. Fractional DS3 should be a lot less expensive and gives you a lot more room to grow. As you have now discovered, adding T-1s to solve bandwidth problems has its limits. The fact that you have 12 point to points between two sites tells me 1) that it's past time to look at this with fresh eyes, 2) your company must have too much money, and 3) your telco really loves you :-> OSPF is 4 equal cost paths. EIRP is 6, and the paths can be of unequal cost. Where are you located? Contact me off line. Chuck ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Routing Protocol Load-Sharing
On Wed, 26 Jul 2000, Evan You wrote: > What is the maximum number of equal-path equal-cost load sharing / balancing > will OSPF or EIGRP do? 6 i believe, and I believe 4 is the default. Brian > > Basically, I have 12 T1 circuits that I am thinking of load-sharing between > two Data Centers. I am either thinking of using a Larscom Orion 4000 IMUX to > bundle the T1 into two groups and out into HSSI interfaces of the 7000 > routers, or just simply hook-up all 12 T1 directly to the routers and have > them load-share the links via routing protocols. But I am not certain if the > second option will work. I know that the routers will be taxed more and the > network overall will have several more routes to handle, but the advantage > is that each link is completely redundant from each other. But more than > anything, I am not sure if any routing protocols will handle 12 > equal-path/equal-cost load-sharing and balancing. > > Thanks, > > Evan You - CCNA > > > > ___ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- - Brian Feeny, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] 318-222-2638 x 109 http://www.shreve.net/~signal Network Administrator ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881) ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Routing Protocol Load-Sharing
Hi Evan, Ospf is like 6 equal cost paths and EIGRP is like 4 equal or unequal cost paths. EIGRP is more flexible to have unequal load balancing. Cu Geert Hampe CCNP+Voice+ATM CCDP Evan You <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 001001bff708$38afaf20$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:001001bff708$38afaf20$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > What is the maximum number of equal-path equal-cost load sharing / balancing > will OSPF or EIGRP do? > > Basically, I have 12 T1 circuits that I am thinking of load-sharing between > two Data Centers. I am either thinking of using a Larscom Orion 4000 IMUX to > bundle the T1 into two groups and out into HSSI interfaces of the 7000 > routers, or just simply hook-up all 12 T1 directly to the routers and have > them load-share the links via routing protocols. But I am not certain if the > second option will work. I know that the routers will be taxed more and the > network overall will have several more routes to handle, but the advantage > is that each link is completely redundant from each other. But more than > anything, I am not sure if any routing protocols will handle 12 > equal-path/equal-cost load-sharing and balancing. > > Thanks, > > Evan You - CCNA > > > > ___ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --- ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: routing protocol
fanj - in a short summary: Name Protocol Number Port BGP 6(TCP)179 IGRP9 n/a (it _is_ prot 9) RIP 17(UDP) 520 EIGRP 88 n/a (it _is_ prot 88) OSPF 89 n/a (it _is_ prot 89) hth Buddy Venne -Original Message- From: Jorge Rodriguez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2000 8:24 PM To: fanj; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: routing protocol Try www.netsys.com <http://www.netsys.com> go to technical library . You can find TCP/UDP port numbers by protocol Jorge Rodriguez /CCNA Network Services Analyst R&S Networks Inc 1112 Boylston Street #222 Boston, MA 02115 1-781-614-1294 http://www.netwire.n3.net/ <http://www.netwire.n3.net/> http://www.learncisco.n3.net/ <http://www.learncisco.n3.net/> - Original Message - From: fanj <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2000 10:18 PM Subject: routing protocol can someone tell me which port the routing protocols are using ? where can I get the details of all the protocols ? Thanks in advance ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: routing protocol
Try www.netsys.com go to technical library . You can find TCP/UDP port numbers by protocol Jorge Rodriguez /CCNANetwork Services AnalystR&S Networks Inc1112 Boylston Street #222Boston, MA 021151-781-614-1294http://www.netwire.n3.net/http://www.learncisco.n3.net/ - Original Message - From: fanj To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2000 10:18 PM Subject: routing protocol can someone tell me which port the routing protocols are using ? where can I get the details of all the protocols ? Thanks in advance
Re: routing protocol
Some routing protocols run right on top of IP, some on top of UDP, some on top of TCP, and IS-IS runs directly over the data-link layer, so researching the answer is a bit difficult. Your best bet is to go to the RFC for the protocol of interest or RFC 1700, the Assigned Numbers RFC, as Chuck L. said. Also, check out books by Doyle, Berkowitz, etc. Also, get yourself a Sniffer! ;-) With that said, here's what I recall: BGP uses TCP port 179 RIP uses UDP port 520 IGRP uses IP protocol type 88 OSPF uses IP protocol type 89 IS-IS uses SAP FE Priscilla At 10:18 AM 5/28/2000 +0800, fanj wrote: > > can someone tell me which port the routing protocols are using ? where can I > get the details of all the protocols ? Thanks in advance __ Priscilla Oppenheimer Phone 541-482-5685 Fax 541-488-1708 Web http://www.priscilla.com ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: routing protocol
RFC 1700 is a good place to start ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc1700.txt you might want to bookmark the following link. you will be referring to it often during your studies going forward. http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html HTH Chuck -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of fanjSent: Saturday, May 27, 2000 7:19 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: routing protocol can someone tell me which port the routing protocols are using ? where can I get the details of all the protocols ? Thanks in advance
