RE: SuperNetting [7:54403]
Are each of these a class c subnet? -Original Message- From: JohnZ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 28 September 2002 04:01 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: SuperNetting [7:54403] Can someone correct if I am wrong here 191.72.1.0 191.72.2.0 191.72.4.0 191.72.12.0 191.72.21.0 Am I correct in supernetting this to 191.72.0.0 /19 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=54414t=54403 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SuperNetting [7:54403]
not quite john.. using your example, a correct example would be something like: 191.72.0.0 /24 (0 = ) 191.72.1.0 /24 191.72.2.0 /24 191.72.3.0 /24 :: :: all combinations /24 networks :: 191.72.221.0 /24 191.72.222.0 /24 191.72.223.0 /24 (223 = 0001) you can than summarise the above to 192.72.0.0 /19 this of course does not have to be /24 networks.. but its probably easier to see it as a /24 example. you could of course have combinations of /20 to /32 networks that are contiguous within 191.72.0.0 to 191.72.223.0 that enable you to summarise as a /19. remember to be able to summarise you require all your networks to be contiguous. hth, mark. -Original Message- From: Symon Thurlow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, 28 September 2002 18:03 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: SuperNetting [7:54403] Are each of these a class c subnet? -Original Message- From: JohnZ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 28 September 2002 04:01 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: SuperNetting [7:54403] Can someone correct if I am wrong here 191.72.1.0 191.72.2.0 191.72.4.0 191.72.12.0 191.72.21.0 Am I correct in supernetting this to 191.72.0.0 /19 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=54415t=54403 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SuperNetting [7:54403]
191.72.223.0 /24 (223 = 0001) Whoa! 223 does not equal 0001. 223 equals 1101. JohnZ was correct in his original post, that his list of subnets can be summarized 191.72.0.0/19, and Chuck's addendum (that he'll also be summarizing additional subnets other than the ones he mentioned) is also true. BJ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=54416t=54403 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SuperNetting [7:54403]
191.72.223.0 /24 (223 = 0001) well yes just a typo :-) and it is true in chuck's addendum. however it might give the impression to the orignal poster that this is ok to do all the time ;-) Mark. -Original Message- From: B.J. Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, 28 September 2002 21:53 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: SuperNetting [7:54403] 191.72.223.0 /24 (223 = 0001) Whoa! 223 does not equal 0001. 223 equals 1101. JohnZ was correct in his original post, that his list of subnets can be summarized 191.72.0.0/19, and Chuck's addendum (that he'll also be summarizing additional subnets other than the ones he mentioned) is also true. BJ Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=54418t=54403 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SuperNetting [7:54403]
Thanks again guys, I think I should have put all the subnets 191.72.1.0 thru 191.72.31.0 to be summarized to 191.72.0.0/19. If I am wrong let me know. Vicuna, Mark wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... 191.72.223.0 /24 (223 = 0001) well yes just a typo :-) and it is true in chuck's addendum. however it might give the impression to the orignal poster that this is ok to do all the time ;-) Mark. -Original Message- From: B.J. Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, 28 September 2002 21:53 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: SuperNetting [7:54403] 191.72.223.0 /24 (223 = 0001) Whoa! 223 does not equal 0001. 223 equals 1101. JohnZ was correct in his original post, that his list of subnets can be summarized 191.72.0.0/19, and Chuck's addendum (that he'll also be summarizing additional subnets other than the ones he mentioned) is also true. BJ Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=54452t=54403 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SuperNetting [7:54403]
Can someone correct if I am wrong here 191.72.1.0 191.72.2.0 191.72.4.0 191.72.12.0 191.72.21.0 Am I correct in supernetting this to 191.72.0.0 /19 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=54403t=54403 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SuperNetting [7:54403]
The configuration you posted will result in a network that looks like the information below. SubnetMask Subnet Size Host Range Broadcast 191.72.0.0 255.255.224.0 8190 191.72.0.1 to 191.72.31.254 191.72.31.255 JohnZ wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Can someone correct if I am wrong here 191.72.1.0 191.72.2.0 191.72.4.0 191.72.12.0 191.72.21.0 Am I correct in supernetting this to 191.72.0.0 /19 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=54404t=54403 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SuperNetting [7:54403]
Short answer: Yes you are correct. Tom -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of JohnZ Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 11:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: SuperNetting [7:54403] Can someone correct if I am wrong here 191.72.1.0 191.72.2.0 191.72.4.0 191.72.12.0 191.72.21.0 Am I correct in supernetting this to 191.72.0.0 /19 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=54405t=54403 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SuperNetting [7:54403]
-- www.chuckslongroad.info like my web site? take the survey! JohnZ wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Can someone correct if I am wrong here 191.72.1.0 x.x.0001.0 191.72.2.0 x.x.0010.0 191.72.4.0 x.x.0100.0 191.72.12.0 x.x.1100.0 191.72.21.0 x.x.00010101.0 Am I correct in supernetting this to 191.72.0.0 /19 255.255.1110.0 first three leftmost bits in the third octet are the only ones common to all the subnets you mention yes, you have supernetted the subnets in question, plus a few more you didn't mention Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=54406t=54403 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SuperNetting [7:54403]
Thanks guys, this answers my question. Chuck I heard you are writing an article on CertZone about 3550. Is that correct if so I look forward to reading it. it's very timely. Chuck's Long Road wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... -- www.chuckslongroad.info like my web site? take the survey! JohnZ wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Can someone correct if I am wrong here 191.72.1.0 x.x.0001.0 191.72.2.0 x.x.0010.0 191.72.4.0 x.x.0100.0 191.72.12.0 x.x.1100.0 191.72.21.0 x.x.00010101.0 Am I correct in supernetting this to 191.72.0.0 /19 255.255.1110.0 first three leftmost bits in the third octet are the only ones common to all the subnets you mention yes, you have supernetted the subnets in question, plus a few more you didn't mention Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=54408t=54403 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
