Re: Re: Tacacs [7:17110]
See this is what I am talking about here is a snipit from that page. __ Download xtacacsd v4.1 for Cisco terminal servers. Does Skey, PH databases, accounting and more _ Note: this software is not being developed any more because of the advent of better protocols such as radius and tac_plus. _ So why don't you just roll that one out since you're busy, then when a bug locks everybody out don't call them for support. You'll be researching how to do a lot of good old fashion console work without the boss finding out. - Original Message - From: "Ramesh K" To: Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 2:14 AM Subject: Re: Re: Tacacs [7:17110] > Hi stephen, > > You can use tacacs if you want to authenticate > the users accessing your routers .You can get the log also.You can download > the same from www.navya.com > I don't have idea about kerboros ... > In my setup tacacs is working fine > > thanks > ramesh > > On Fri, 24 Aug 2001 Stephen Skinner wrote : > >Hello, > > > >i don`t mean to be rude but i think the reason the > >gentleman replyed the > >way he did was because way you posed your question was > >to say > > > >" i`m to busy ...you lot do it for me" > > > >now i personal believe that that is not the case and > >you were simply asking > >(as i do all the time) for some assistance in this > >subject matter. > > > >unfortunatly i don`t have an answer to your question > >but also require info > >on tacacs+so please don`t be afraid to pass on what > >you may learn > > > > > >Kindest Regards > > > > > >steve > > > > > >>From: "khramov" > >>Reply-To: "khramov" > >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Subject: Re: Tacacs [7:17110] > >>Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 10:58:12 -0400 > >> > >>As far as I know this is Cisco newsgroup and it should > >be used for > >>technical > >>discussions > >>not for personal insults. If you think that you are > >smarter than me or > >>have > >>better work > >>habits that is fine, I am not going to argue with > >that. Otherwise I would > >>be asking > >>questions. > >> > >>Donald B Johnson jr wrote: > >> > >> > After someone gives you an answer, are you going to > >have time to > >>research > >>if > >> > it is a good solution for you or are you going to > >just implement it. > >> > It sure must warm the cockles of your supervisors > >heart if he could see > >>you > >> > now. > >> > actually the only two things that would make me to > >busy that I couldn't > >> > research an access solution would be; > >> > A raging blaze > >> > A Seinfeld rerun > >> > don > >> > > >> > - Original Message - > >> > From: "khramov" > >> > To: > >> > Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 6:17 AM > >> > Subject: Tacacs [7:17110] > >> > > >> > > Hi, > >> > > Just like everyone else sometimes I do not have > >enough time to do the > >> > > research myself and I post questions here. Here > >is what I am trying > >>to > >> > > do: I am trying to set up some sort of security > >server on my network > >>to > >> > > > >> > > authorize user access on routers and switches. > >First of all what > >>should > >> > > > >> > > I use Tacacs (extended or +), Radius, Kerberos, > >which one seem to work > >> > > better. Second where can I buy/download the > >software or can I just > >> > > configure a router as a Tacacs server. Just give > >me some ideas on > >>this. > >> > > > >> > > Thanks a lot, > >> > > alex > >- > >_ > >Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at > >http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp > >110 > >-- > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=17454&t=17110 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Re: Tacacs [7:17110]
Hi stephen, You can use tacacs if you want to authenticate the users accessing your routers .You can get the log also.You can download the same from www.navya.com I don't have idea about kerboros ... In my setup tacacs is working fine thanks ramesh On Fri, 24 Aug 2001 Stephen Skinner wrote : >Hello, > >i don`t mean to be rude but i think the reason the >gentleman replyed the >way he did was because way you posed your question was >to say > >" i`m to busy ...you lot do it for me" > >now i personal believe that that is not the case and >you were simply asking >(as i do all the time) for some assistance in this >subject matter. > >unfortunatly i don`t have an answer to your question >but also require info >on tacacs+so please don`t be afraid to pass on what >you may learn > > >Kindest Regards > > >steve > > >>From: "khramov" >>Reply-To: "khramov" >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: Re: Tacacs [7:17110] >>Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 10:58:12 -0400 >> >>As far as I know this is Cisco newsgroup and it should >be used for >>technical >>discussions >>not for personal insults. If you think that you are >smarter than me or >>have >>better work >>habits that is fine, I am not going to argue with >that. Otherwise I would >>be asking >>questions. >> >>Donald B Johnson jr wrote: >> >> > After someone gives you an answer, are you going to >have time to >>research >>if >> > it is a good solution for you or are you going to >just implement it. >> > It sure must warm the cockles of your supervisors >heart if he could see >>you >> > now. >> > actually the only two things that would make me to >busy that I couldn't >> > research an access solution would be; >> > A raging blaze >> > A Seinfeld rerun >> > don >> > >> > - Original Message - >> > From: "khramov" >> > To: >> > Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 6:17 AM >> > Subject: Tacacs [7:17110] >> > >> > > Hi, >> > > Just like everyone else sometimes I do not have >enough time to do the >> > > research myself and I post questions here. Here >is what I am trying >>to >> > > do: I am trying to set up some sort of security >server on my network >>to >> > > >> > > authorize user access on routers and switches. >First of all what >>should >> > > >> > > I use Tacacs (extended or +), Radius, Kerberos, >which one seem to work >> > > better. Second where can I buy/download the >software or can I just >> > > configure a router as a Tacacs server. Just give >me some ideas on >>this. >> > > >> > > Thanks a lot, >> > > alex >- >_ >Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at >http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp >110 >-- >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to >[EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=17369&t=17110 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tacacs [7:17110]
No that is not it Steve, my therapist says if I'm good all week I can have a relapse or two on friday. P>) - Original Message - From: "Stephen Skinner" To: Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 9:00 AM Subject: Re: Tacacs [7:17110] > Hello, > > i don`t mean to be rude but i think the reason the gentleman replyed the > way he did was because way you posed your question was to say > > " i`m to busy ...you lot do it for me" > > now i personal believe that that is not the case and you were simply asking > (as i do all the time) for some assistance in this subject matter. > > unfortunatly i don`t have an answer to your question but also require info > on tacacs+so please don`t be afraid to pass on what you may learn > > > Kindest Regards > > > steve > > > >From: "khramov" > >Reply-To: "khramov" > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Re: Tacacs [7:17110] > >Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 10:58:12 -0400 > > > >As far as I know this is Cisco newsgroup and it should be used for > >technical > >discussions > >not for personal insults. If you think that you are smarter than me or > >have > >better work > >habits that is fine, I am not going to argue with that. Otherwise I would > >be asking > >questions. > > > >Donald B Johnson jr wrote: > > > > > After someone gives you an answer, are you going to have time to > >research > >if > > > it is a good solution for you or are you going to just implement it. > > > It sure must warm the cockles of your supervisors heart if he could see > >you > > > now. > > > actually the only two things that would make me to busy that I couldn't > > > research an access solution would be; > > > A raging blaze > > > A Seinfeld rerun > > > don > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > From: "khramov" > > > To: > > > Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 6:17 AM > > > Subject: Tacacs [7:17110] > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > Just like everyone else sometimes I do not have enough time to do the > > > > research myself and I post questions here. Here is what I am trying > >to > > > > do: I am trying to set up some sort of security server on my network > >to > > > > > > > > authorize user access on routers and switches. First of all what > >should > > > > > > > > I use Tacacs (extended or +), Radius, Kerberos, which one seem to work > > > > better. Second where can I buy/download the software or can I just > > > > configure a router as a Tacacs server. Just give me some ideas on > >this. > > > > > > > > Thanks a lot, > > > > alex > _ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=17161&t=17110 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tacacs [7:17110]
Hello, i don`t mean to be rude but i think the reason the gentleman replyed the way he did was because way you posed your question was to say " i`m to busy ...you lot do it for me" now i personal believe that that is not the case and you were simply asking (as i do all the time) for some assistance in this subject matter. unfortunatly i don`t have an answer to your question but also require info on tacacs+so please don`t be afraid to pass on what you may learn Kindest Regards steve >From: "khramov" >Reply-To: "khramov" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Tacacs [7:17110] >Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 10:58:12 -0400 > >As far as I know this is Cisco newsgroup and it should be used for >technical >discussions >not for personal insults. If you think that you are smarter than me or >have >better work >habits that is fine, I am not going to argue with that. Otherwise I would >be asking >questions. > >Donald B Johnson jr wrote: > > > After someone gives you an answer, are you going to have time to >research >if > > it is a good solution for you or are you going to just implement it. > > It sure must warm the cockles of your supervisors heart if he could see >you > > now. > > actually the only two things that would make me to busy that I couldn't > > research an access solution would be; > > A raging blaze > > A Seinfeld rerun > > don > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "khramov" > > To: > > Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 6:17 AM > > Subject: Tacacs [7:17110] > > > > > Hi, > > > Just like everyone else sometimes I do not have enough time to do the > > > research myself and I post questions here. Here is what I am trying >to > > > do: I am trying to set up some sort of security server on my network >to > > > > > > authorize user access on routers and switches. First of all what >should > > > > > > I use Tacacs (extended or +), Radius, Kerberos, which one seem to work > > > better. Second where can I buy/download the software or can I just > > > configure a router as a Tacacs server. Just give me some ideas on >this. > > > > > > Thanks a lot, > > > alex _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=17140&t=17110 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tacacs [7:17110]
If you are familiar with Unix, contact me off-line and I will assist you with installing and configuring TACACS on Unix platform. I can also help you with configuring routers and switches as well. >From: "khramov" >Reply-To: "khramov" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Tacacs [7:17110] >Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 10:58:12 -0400 > >As far as I know this is Cisco newsgroup and it should be used for technical >discussions >not for personal insults. If you think that you are smarter than me or have >better work >habits that is fine, I am not going to argue with that. Otherwise I would >be asking >questions. > >Donald B Johnson jr wrote: > > > After someone gives you an answer, are you going to have time to research >if > > it is a good solution for you or are you going to just implement it. > > It sure must warm the cockles of your supervisors heart if he could see you > > now. > > actually the only two things that would make me to busy that I couldn't > > research an access solution would be; > > A raging blaze > > A Seinfeld rerun > > don > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "khramov" > > To: > > Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 6:17 AM > > Subject: Tacacs [7:17110] > > > > > Hi, > > > Just like everyone else sometimes I do not have enough time to do the > > > research myself and I post questions here. Here is what I am trying to > > > do: I am trying to set up some sort of security server on my network to > > > > > > authorize user access on routers and switches. First of all what should > > > > > > I use Tacacs (extended or +), Radius, Kerberos, which one seem to work > > > better. Second where can I buy/download the software or can I just > > > configure a router as a Tacacs server. Just give me some ideas on this. > > > > > > Thanks a lot, misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=17136&t=17110 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tacacs [7:17110]
As far as I know this is Cisco newsgroup and it should be used for technical discussions not for personal insults. If you think that you are smarter than me or have better work habits that is fine, I am not going to argue with that. Otherwise I would be asking questions. Donald B Johnson jr wrote: > After someone gives you an answer, are you going to have time to research if > it is a good solution for you or are you going to just implement it. > It sure must warm the cockles of your supervisors heart if he could see you > now. > actually the only two things that would make me to busy that I couldn't > research an access solution would be; > A raging blaze > A Seinfeld rerun > don > > - Original Message - > From: "khramov" > To: > Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 6:17 AM > Subject: Tacacs [7:17110] > > > Hi, > > Just like everyone else sometimes I do not have enough time to do the > > research myself and I post questions here. Here is what I am trying to > > do: I am trying to set up some sort of security server on my network to > > > > authorize user access on routers and switches. First of all what should > > > > I use Tacacs (extended or +), Radius, Kerberos, which one seem to work > > better. Second where can I buy/download the software or can I just > > configure a router as a Tacacs server. Just give me some ideas on this. > > > > Thanks a lot, > > alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=17126&t=17110 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tacacs [7:17110]
After someone gives you an answer, are you going to have time to research if it is a good solution for you or are you going to just implement it. It sure must warm the cockles of your supervisors heart if he could see you now. actually the only two things that would make me to busy that I couldn't research an access solution would be; A raging blaze A Seinfeld rerun don - Original Message - From: "khramov" To: Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 6:17 AM Subject: Tacacs [7:17110] > Hi, > Just like everyone else sometimes I do not have enough time to do the > research myself and I post questions here. Here is what I am trying to > do: I am trying to set up some sort of security server on my network to > > authorize user access on routers and switches. First of all what should > > I use Tacacs (extended or +), Radius, Kerberos, which one seem to work > better. Second where can I buy/download the software or can I just > configure a router as a Tacacs server. Just give me some ideas on this. > > Thanks a lot, > alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=17119&t=17110 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tacacs [7:17110]
Hi, Just like everyone else sometimes I do not have enough time to do the research myself and I post questions here. Here is what I am trying to do: I am trying to set up some sort of security server on my network to authorize user access on routers and switches. First of all what should I use Tacacs (extended or +), Radius, Kerberos, which one seem to work better. Second where can I buy/download the software or can I just configure a router as a Tacacs server. Just give me some ideas on this. Thanks a lot, alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=17110&t=17110 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
