Which one is correct?
Hi all. I need your help. Which one do you think is correct in frame-relay network? A. subinterface(central site): local DLCI number=1:1 B. a PVC:local DLCI number=1:1 I am trying to understand a concept in Frame relay network. Answering these questions would be greatly helpful to me. I hope it is clear question. jw __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Calendar - Get organized for the holidays! http://calendar.yahoo.com/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Which one is correct?
It is quite an unclear question. first, at least one pvc will need to be setup, no matter how you look at it; subinterface or not. at any type of central site, i reccomend using subinterfaces, this way you when you go to expand, you dont wind up with an inconsistent config. everything will be on subinterfaces, and when you type show run, you rconfig will be prettier. from your "description", it is not apparent if you need point-to-multipont or point-to-point subinterfaces. jeongwoo park wrote: > Hi all. > I need your help. > Which one do you think is correct in frame-relay > network? > A. subinterface(central site): local DLCI number=1:1 > B. a PVC:local DLCI number=1:1 > > I am trying to understand a concept in Frame relay > network. > Answering these questions would be greatly helpful to > me. > I hope it is clear question. > > jw > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Calendar - Get organized for the holidays! > http://calendar.yahoo.com/ > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Which one is correct?
It is quite an unclear question. first, at least one pvc will need to be setup, no matter how you look at it; subinterface or not. at any type of central site, i reccomend using subinterfaces, this way you when you go to expand, you dont wind up with an inconsistent config. everything will be on subinterfaces, and when you type show run, you rconfig will be prettier. from your "description", it is not apparent if you need point-to-multipont or point-to-point subinterfaces. jeongwoo park wrote: > Hi all. > I need your help. > Which one do you think is correct in frame-relay > network? > A. subinterface(central site): local DLCI number=1:1 > B. a PVC:local DLCI number=1:1 > > I am trying to understand a concept in Frame relay > network. > Answering these questions would be greatly helpful to > me. > I hope it is clear question. > > jw > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Calendar - Get organized for the holidays! > http://calendar.yahoo.com/ > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Which one is correct?
Sorry for the unclear question. What I was trying to ask was the FR configured with Multipoint. When multiple PVCs are configured in a subinterface of the central site router, I was wondering how many local DLCI numbers are needed. There are three branch offices, and each branch office has two PVCs going to central site router. Then there will be totally 6 PVCs in this whole structure. From the view of central site, its router has three subinterfaces, and each subinterface has two PVCs. Now, how many DLCI numbers do I need totally at central site router? Would it be 6 because there are six PVCs? or Would it be 3 because there are three subinterfaces? I hope this question is clearer. --- "Peter I. Slow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It is quite an unclear question. > first, at least one pvc will need to be setup, no > matter how you look at it; > subinterface or not. > at any type of central site, i reccomend using > subinterfaces, this way you when you go > to expand, you dont wind up with an inconsistent > config. everything will be on > subinterfaces, and when you type show run, you > rconfig will be prettier. from your > "description", it is not apparent if you need > point-to-multipont or point-to-point > subinterfaces. > > > jeongwoo park wrote: > > > Hi all. > > I need your help. > > Which one do you think is correct in frame-relay > > network? > > A. subinterface(central site): local DLCI > number=1:1 > > B. a PVC:local DLCI number=1:1 > > > > I am trying to understand a concept in Frame > relay > > network. > > Answering these questions would be greatly > helpful to > > me. > > I hope it is clear question. > > > > jw > > > > __ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Yahoo! Calendar - Get organized for the holidays! > > http://calendar.yahoo.com/ > > > > _ > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Calendar - Get organized for the holidays! http://calendar.yahoo.com/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Which one is correct?
On Sat, 11 Nov 2000, jeongwoo park wrote: > Sorry for the unclear question. > > What I was trying to ask was the FR configured with > Multipoint. > When multiple PVCs are configured in a subinterface of > the central site router, I was wondering how many > local DLCI numbers are needed. There are three branch > offices, and each branch office has two PVCs going to > central site router. Then there will be totally 6 PVCs > in this whole structure. From the view of central > site, its router has three subinterfaces, and each > subinterface has two PVCs. > Now, how many DLCI numbers do I need totally at > central site router? > Would it be 6 because there are six PVCs? > or > Would it be 3 because there are three subinterfaces? 3 because their are 3 sub-interfaces. Brian > > I hope this question is clearer. > > --- Brian Feeny, CCNP, CCDP [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881) _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Which one is correct?
You're talking about 2 PVC's going to the same site from one site? Like Site A's connection to Site B's connection has 2 PVCs? I believe if that's the case, you'll need 2 DLCIs since you need 1 DLCI per PVC. For 3 subinterfaces, you'll have a total of 6 if I understood your question right. It's quite strange to have 2 PVCs going to the same site though... Kenneth jeongwoo park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Sorry for the unclear question. > > What I was trying to ask was the FR configured with > Multipoint. > When multiple PVCs are configured in a subinterface of > the central site router, I was wondering how many > local DLCI numbers are needed. There are three branch > offices, and each branch office has two PVCs going to > central site router. Then there will be totally 6 PVCs > in this whole structure. From the view of central > site, its router has three subinterfaces, and each > subinterface has two PVCs. > Now, how many DLCI numbers do I need totally at > central site router? > Would it be 6 because there are six PVCs? > or > Would it be 3 because there are three subinterfaces? > > I hope this question is clearer. > > --- "Peter I. Slow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It is quite an unclear question. > > first, at least one pvc will need to be setup, no > > matter how you look at it; > > subinterface or not. > > at any type of central site, i reccomend using > > subinterfaces, this way you when you go > > to expand, you dont wind up with an inconsistent > > config. everything will be on > > subinterfaces, and when you type show run, you > > rconfig will be prettier. from your > > "description", it is not apparent if you need > > point-to-multipont or point-to-point > > subinterfaces. > > > > > > jeongwoo park wrote: > > > > > Hi all. > > > I need your help. > > > Which one do you think is correct in frame-relay > > > network? > > > A. subinterface(central site): local DLCI > > number=1:1 > > > B. a PVC:local DLCI number=1:1 > > > > > > I am trying to understand a concept in Frame > > relay > > > network. > > > Answering these questions would be greatly > > helpful to > > > me. > > > I hope it is clear question. > > > > > > jw > > > > > > __ > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > Yahoo! Calendar - Get organized for the holidays! > > > http://calendar.yahoo.com/ > > > > > > _ > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Calendar - Get organized for the holidays! > http://calendar.yahoo.com/ > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Which one is correct?
I am assuming you have two PVCs at each branch office for either a doubly-large CIR, or because you have two physical interfaces. either way, unless some weird frame-switching is being done, and im not sure if this is possible ( though it prolly is ) each branch office pvc is going to require a corresponding pvc at the CO. you will need to use six frame-relay map commands on the point-to-multipoint at the CO. (i think) -Peter On Sat, 11 Nov 2000, jeongwoo park wrote: > Sorry for the unclear question. > > What I was trying to ask was the FR configured with > Multipoint. > When multiple PVCs are configured in a subinterface of > the central site router, I was wondering how many > local DLCI numbers are needed. There are three branch > offices, and each branch office has two PVCs going to > central site router. Then there will be totally 6 PVCs > in this whole structure. From the view of central > site, its router has three subinterfaces, and each > subinterface has two PVCs. > Now, how many DLCI numbers do I need totally at > central site router? > Would it be 6 because there are six PVCs? > or > Would it be 3 because there are three subinterfaces? > > I hope this question is clearer. > > --- "Peter I. Slow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It is quite an unclear question. > > first, at least one pvc will need to be setup, no > > matter how you look at it; > > subinterface or not. > > at any type of central site, i reccomend using > > subinterfaces, this way you when you go > > to expand, you dont wind up with an inconsistent > > config. everything will be on > > subinterfaces, and when you type show run, you > > rconfig will be prettier. from your > > "description", it is not apparent if you need > > point-to-multipont or point-to-point > > subinterfaces. > > > > > > jeongwoo park wrote: > > > > > Hi all. > > > I need your help. > > > Which one do you think is correct in frame-relay > > > network? > > > A. subinterface(central site): local DLCI > > number=1:1 > > > B. a PVC:local DLCI number=1:1 > > > > > > I am trying to understand a concept in Frame > > relay > > > network. > > > Answering these questions would be greatly > > helpful to > > > me. > > > I hope it is clear question. > > > > > > jw > > > > > > __ > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > Yahoo! Calendar - Get organized for the holidays! > > > http://calendar.yahoo.com/ > > > > > > _ > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Calendar - Get organized for the holidays! > http://calendar.yahoo.com/ > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
