Re: [c-nsp] Multicast Issue
You may be running out of bandwidth (or other resources) in the point where your traffic is being replicated. Diogo On 6/3/12, Tony td_mi...@yahoo.com wrote: Badly configured QoS perhaps ? What about limitation on how much of the link can be used for multicast ? Can you try adding incremental streams in smaller amounts to find at what point you have too much traffic ? Have you graphed the usage on the link to verify that the amount of bandwidth being used is indeed what you think it might be ? There are about 101 different reasons it could be performing badly, we're sort of just throwing suggestions out there. regards, Tony. From: Mohammad Khalil eng_m...@hotmail.com To: m...@mcadory.info Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Sunday, 3 June 2012 3:22 PM Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Multicast Issue Hi , the issue seems not BW issue as according to the specifications , each TV is supposed to consume 5M So any ideas? BR, Mohammad Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 23:44:31 -0500 Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Multicast Issue From: m...@mcadory.info To: eng_m...@hotmail.com CC: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net http://www.cardinalpeak.com/blog/?p=1054 is a good explanation of bit rate measurement process using WS. Use that to validate your expected 8Mbps stream rate. Also validate with your DSLAM operator that the 24Mbps you quote isn't total video and IPTV, but dedicated to video (or at least dedicated when video is flowing) to get your ~3 streams worth. Matt On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Mohammad Khalil eng_m...@hotmail.com wrote: The downstream is configured to be 24 M but the upstream is configured to be 4M this is the current setup , so it is for sure bandwidth issue ? From: mark.ti...@seacom.mu To: eng_m...@hotmail.com Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Multicast Issue Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 08:18:57 +0200 CC: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net On Wednesday, May 30, 2012 08:14:20 AM Mohammad Khalil wrote: Actually its supposed for each stream to consume 8M should i try to increase the speed limits configured ? As this is VDSL, are you sure you're actually getting 24Mbps into the house? We tested IPTv on VDSL using new copper across 50m - it was a disaster. If you can, try increasing bandwidth and see if that helps. But it definitely sounds like when you request a 2nd stream and the picture develops block noise, you're starving the link of bandwidth. Mark. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ -- Sent from my mobile device ./diogo -montagner JNCIE-M 0x41A ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Freeware management software
I have heard good feedback from people who used Zabbix. I never used it but it appear to be a good software. The same guys who used it also tried nagios and they told me that Zabbix is better. http://www.zabbix.com/ ./diogo -montagner On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 4:36 PM, char...@thewybles.com wrote: I use nagios (which underpins opsview) to monitor 1000 plus servers deployed througout the united states. Works like a champ. Several sites use nagios to handle multi thousand nodes with dozens of checks per node. Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile -Original Message- From: Rubens Kuhl rube...@gmail.com Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 16:27:38 To: Royr.engehau...@gmail.com Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.netcisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Freeware management software How well does Opsview scale to, for instance, 10 thousand devices and 20 thousand data sources ? Rubens On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Roy r.engehau...@gmail.com wrote: Opsview??? http://www.opsview.org Arne Larsen / Region Nordjylland wrote: Hi Folks. Can someone give me a hint, I’m looking for freeware management software like NMIS. Software that can provide reachability, availablility an health scores. NMIS Dashboard doesn’t seem to scale in large network. I like the dashboard off NMIS, it’s easy for anyone to understand the red green function.. But it can’t discover devices, it’s a static configuration imnplementing NMIS. Does anyone know off freeware software ala HP Openview. /Arne ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Help with multilink ppp, routing not working correctly..
Hi Howard, If your configuration is all here then you need a static route in B router pointing to C. Regards, ./diogo -montagner On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 8:18 PM, Howard Leadmon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can't believe this one isn't working, I am sure I am looking over something stupid. I needed to mux up 3x T1's between a location. Information is as follows: (relevant bits) Location-A: Cisco 1720 ! interface Serial0 description To Location-B ip address 38.103.8.238 255.255.255.252 ! ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 38.103.8.237 ! Location-B: Cat5500 RSM ! interface Multilink1 description T1 MultiLink PPP Bundle to Location-C ip address 192.168.98.29 255.255.255.252 ppp multilink multilink-group 1 ! interface Serial1/2:1 description To Location-A ip address 38.103.8.237 255.255.255.252 ! interface Serial1/5:1 description T1 3 of 3 (MultiLink) no ip address encapsulation ppp ppp multilink multilink-group 1 ! interface Serial1/6:1 description T1 2 of 3 (MultiLink) no ip address encapsulation ppp ppp multilink multilink-group 1 ! interface Serial1/7:1 description T1 1 of 3 (MultiLink) no ip address encapsulation ppp no fair-queue ppp multilink multilink-group 1 ! ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 to global internet gateway! Location-C: Cisco 6509 Sup2 w/FlexWan ! interface Multilink1 description T1 Bundle to Corporate ip address 192.168.98.30 255.255.255.252 ppp multilink multilink-group 1 ! interface Serial3/0/0:0 description T1 1 of 3 no ip address encapsulation ppp no fair-queue ppp multilink multilink-group 1 ! interface Serial3/0/1:0 description T1 2 of 3 no ip address encapsulation ppp ppp multilink multilink-group 1 ! interface Serial3/0/2:0 description T1 3 of 3 no ip address encapsulation ppp ppp multilink multilink-group 1 ! ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.98.29 ! The interfaces are up and running, the multilink bundle looks good, and if I ping or trace from A to B, or B to A life is good. If I try and go from B to C or C to B, again life is good. If I try and go from A to the internet via B, or from C via B to the internet all is good. So it looks like all is working. Where I get bit, is if I try and go from A to C, or C to A. I can not ping, and if I trace it dies on router B. So it looks like single hop is good, and if I go to another location out off of B (other networks) all is good, but if I try and cross any other internal interface on the router and cross the MLPPP link it dies. I was just going to use CEF to handle the link with per-packet load sharing with a dynamic routing protocol, but apparently the FlexWan controller doesn't support it, or it barked about an unknown command. Anyway trying to debunk this I stripped it back to the above, just static routes between A-to-B-to-C, and still it will not route. This is part of a larger network, and none of the other remote enpoints will cross that multilink line, and I can't pin down why. I am open to any suggestions, as I rarely use MLPPP, and am sure I am missing something, but damn I would think two simple hops with static routes should just go. Thanks to any that can offer assistance on debunking this one.. P.S. - Yes I know I have some routable, and some unroutable IP's, but this is all behind a firewall, and gateways out, I just haven't gotten them to pull the old public IP's out, granted that shouldn't matter for an internal (in essence) isolated network. --- Howard Leadmon ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Expression to match 1, 2, or 3 AS paths
Thanks for all! Regards, ./diogo -montagner On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 7:04 AM, Tim Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, June 14, 2008 5:08 am, Diogo Montagner wrote: Some days ago I was trying to identify prepends using regular expressions without knowing the AS. You can do this with regexp back-references. ([0-9]+)(_\1)+ will match any AS that's prepended at least once, and ([0-9]+)(_\1)* will match the same AS any number of times. You could use explicit repetitions of '_\1' if you want to match a specific number of prepends. Regards, Tim. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Expression to match 1, 2, or 3 AS paths
Great! And how I could match prepends, ie, how I could identify AS paths which has prepends ? Regards, ./diogo -montagner On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 7:21 PM, Deepak Jain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And since you can't have non-numeric AS numbers... you can always use . like ^.+$ DJ Daniel Faubel wrote: I like to use this: ^[0-9]+$ ^[0-9]+_[0-9]+$ ^[0-9]+_[0-9]+_[0-9]+$ -Daniel -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of james edwards Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 1:41 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] Expression to match 1, 2, or 3 AS paths What have i done wrong here, I used to use this to match 1,2 and 3 AS path, for filtering down a full table: ^[0-9]*$ ^[0-9]*_[0-9]*$ ^[0-9]*_[0-9]*_[0-9]*$ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Expression to match 1, 2, or 3 AS paths
Hi Darryl, many thanks. This was exactly my doubt. Some days ago I was trying to identify prepends using regular expressions without knowing the AS. Regards, ./diogo -montagner On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 11:47 PM, Darryl Dunkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You would have to specify the AS, as using wildcard digits won't identify repetition. If you had 500 500 500 400, or 500 500 400 400, where 500 was connected to you: ^500(_500)*(_400)*$ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Diogo Montagner Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 18:54 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Expression to match 1, 2, or 3 AS paths Great! And how I could match prepends, ie, how I could identify AS paths which has prepends ? Regards, ./diogo -montagner On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 7:21 PM, Deepak Jain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And since you can't have non-numeric AS numbers... you can always use . like ^.+$ DJ Daniel Faubel wrote: I like to use this: ^[0-9]+$ ^[0-9]+_[0-9]+$ ^[0-9]+_[0-9]+_[0-9]+$ -Daniel -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of james edwards Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 1:41 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] Expression to match 1, 2, or 3 AS paths What have i done wrong here, I used to use this to match 1,2 and 3 AS path, for filtering down a full table: ^[0-9]*$ ^[0-9]*_[0-9]*$ ^[0-9]*_[0-9]*_[0-9]*$ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Forcing routes
Hi Gary, you can use bgp always-compare-med. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk365/technologies_tech_note09186a0080094925.shtml Regards, Diogo On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 1:35 PM, Gary Roberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a customer who is multihomed to my network. He has RouterX. I have R1 and R2 connected to his RouterX. My R1 is in AS1 and my R2 is in AS2. I want to sent him a BGP advertisement in such a way that he always prefers to use R1. I cannot use MEDs as the AS numbers of my R1 and R2 are different. I cannot use local preference as I am not allowed to change anything on his route (don't ask just take it as a given). My path lengths are the same. How can I force his router to always choose my R1 path as the best one? Once I have done this I then want to be able to turn this on or off based on a Tunnel on R1 being up (which I guess will be object tracking) but until I know how to solve the first part - I can't tackle the second part. Thanks, Gary ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ -- ./diogo -montagner ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] BootVars Keep Erasing Themselves
Hi Ronen, check the bugs for your rommon version. I experienced some problems like you under rommon version 8.1.3 using SUP720. Regards, Diogo On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 8:28 PM, Ronen Isaac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello All, I have run into a baffling wall and after 4 days or tinkering and reading online I am turning to you hoping that you might be of assistance. I have a Cat6509 w/ SUP2/MSFC2 that I converted from Hybrid mode to Native mode following these instructions to the letter: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps708/products_tech_note 09186a008015bfa6.shtmlhttp://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps708/products_tech_note09186a008015bfa6.shtml I reloaded the switch a couple of times and even turned off/on the power briefly to make sure all settings took. Everything seemed to work great. I then turned it off for a day and when I turned it back on it booted through the SP OK but when starting to boot the RP I get this, Warning: Rommon NVRAM area is corrupted and it goes to ROMMON mode. I then added the bootvars again and made sure the register was at 0x2102 and reset the switch. It loaded through... While in IOS I went ahead and did and erase nvram to format and start over. I then redid the bootvars, did a remote command switch show boot to ensure the SP bootvars were OK and reloaded the switch. It loaded all the way through and the bootvars were intact. So I turn it off and let it sit for 10 min, fire it up and again I get the same error, Warning: Rommon NVRAM area is corrupted and it goes to ROMMON mode. I do this for about 2 days. I then proceeded to upgrade the image and the ROMMON, redid the config, turned off the switch, waited 10 min and it still didn't take. If you have any thoughts I would greatly appreciate hearing them. Thanks so much for your time and have a great weekend! Image: 12.2(18)SXF14 ROMMON: 12.2(17r)S5 P.S. There is only one SUP in the chassis and this happens on 2 separate sup engines. Kind Regards, Ronen Isaac Continental Computers 920 N. Nash St. Bldg B El Segundo, CA 90245 310/416-1200:voice 310/350-8456:cell 310/416-1443:fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.conticomp.com www.wlanmall.com http://www.wlanmall.com/ www.webuycisco.com AOL IM: ccro02 **Your trusted partner for DEC, CISCO, COMPAQ, JUNIPER, MOTOROLA CANOPY, AIRAYA, PROXIM, AXIS IP Cameras, MILESTONE Surveillance Software and more for over 20 years! ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ -- ./diogo -montagner ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Interruptions when enabling mls qos
Hi Peter, just like Ruben, I never saw interruption in service during the activation of 'mls qos' command. Regards, Diogo On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 7:17 AM, Ruben Montes (Europe) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I enabled this command in the core of a living network (4x 6500) during working hours and there wasn't any impact in the network, or it was negligible. Regards, Ruben ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ -- ./diogo -montagner ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] Getting BGP peer route information using SNMP
Hi All, I was asking me if is there a way to get routes information from a BGP peer using SNMP ? In other words, I would like to get the output of command: show ip bgp neighbor x.y.z.w advertised-routes using a snmpwalk. I checked the BGP MIBv1 and MIBv2 of Cisco but I couldn't find the information about routes that are being advertised by the BGP peer. The only information that I can get is the information about the peer state, local and remote port or remote AS and others. The IOS version is 12.0.32S8 and the router is a Cisco 12k. My first choice to do this was a perl script to execute this command and save the output into a file. But if is possible, I prefer to do this using SNMP. If there is no way to do this using SNMP, I will use the perl script. Thanks in advance, ./diogo -montagner ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] changing from ospf to eigrp
I suggest to you the article Understanding Redistribution http://blog.internetworkexpert.com/2008/02/09/understanding-redistribution-part-i/ This article didn't explain the process of migration from OSPF to EIGRP but it give to you many tips about redistribution scenary. This tips could be very useful during your migration. Best regards, ./diogo -montagner On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 2:39 PM, Hank Nussbacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would like to change our layer 3 switches from ospf to eirgrp. Is there a way I can accomplish this on a live system without causing problems? Can I run both at the same time? You realize that if you ever want to run MPLS you need OSPF and not EIGRP. Also, if you ever want to buy a non-Cisco router for your network, you can't since you now run EIGRP. But I'm sure you knew that already. -Hank ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ -- ./diogo -montagner ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] MPLS VPN EIGRP tag/route redistribution ideas at PE
Hi Ben, Did you tried to use the Site of Origin feature ? http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_3t/12_3t8/feature/guide/gtmvesoo.html Best regards, Diogo On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 2:28 AM, Ben Steele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Scenario: cluster of PE's terminating DSL CE's running EIGRP between CE and PE in MPLS VPN's, so the CE's could terminate on any one of the PE's. Problem: would like to identify EIGRP routes from certain neighbors for BGP redistribution to use set extcommunity cost pre-bestpath x x for weighting within the vrf, unfortunately when you are talking about multiple CE's on the same PE it becomes hard to distinguish the routes from one to another in BGP eyes as the origin is incomplete. Solution: I would like the solution to be independent of the CE if possible, so far I have thought about a route-map that would contain the prefixes I am interested in configured on each PE that would set the pre-bestpath based on the route-map prefixes so that way it doesn't matter where the CE lands the prefixes get the appropriate setting. This is a little bit of an administrative over hang should the C decide to change their prefixes at any stage, what I would like is some sort of tag I can put on within the eigrp vrf that will carry through to the BGP vrf to match on, so I can match purely based on the EIGRP neighbor on the EIGRP side of things then just have BGP match on a tag/value, any ideas? Cheers Ben ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ -- ./diogo -montagner ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] WS-X6148-RJ-21 performance check
Hi all, how I can check if a C6513/WS-X6148-RJ-21 module reached the maximum forward capacity (in this case 15 Mpps) ? Best regards, Diogo -- ./diogo -montagner ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] WS-X6148-RJ-21 performance check
Thanks for all replies. Diogo On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 2:32 PM, Sukumar Subburayan (sukumars) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Since, the 6148 linecard does not have a DFC, and relies on central forwarding from the EARL on the sup, you could check the current forwarding rates of the Central EARL using either: sup-720#show mls statistics Statistics for Earl in Module 6 L2 Forwarding Engine Total packets Switched: 85667923 --- L3 Forwarding Engine Total packets L3 Switched : 77712372 @ 20 pps or 2-13-mid-720#show platform hardware capacity forwarding snip Forwarding engine load: Module pps peak-pps peak-time 5 20 2882 23:35:31 UTC Sun Nov 30 2008 6 22 2791 23:35:17 UTC Sun Nov 30 2008 sukumar -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Diogo Montagner Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 7:00 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] WS-X6148-RJ-21 performance check Hi all, how I can check if a C6513/WS-X6148-RJ-21 module reached the maximum forward capacity (in this case 15 Mpps) ? Best regards, Diogo -- ./diogo -montagner ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ -- ./diogo -montagner ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Ping packet 1400byte on cisco consume 2Mbps of bandwith
Hi Aaron, verify if the connection between the switches is loop-free. Regards, ./diogo -montagner On 9/27/07, Aaron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Supply router and card types. On 9/27/07, Aladi Saputra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear all, i have a network like this : ISP Metro Ethernet link Cisco Router A = Catalyst 2900 = Catalyst == Cisco Router B Condition : 1. ISP Link is 1,5Mbps 2. All off Interconection link using UTP Cat5 Problem : If Router A ping to Router B with 1400byte or Router B Ping with 1400byte to Router A , it's take more than 2Mbps of Bandwith. It is Normally or maybe somebody can give me an explanation for this . Thank's Regards, Putra mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ indomail - Your everyday mail - http://indomail.indo.net.id ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] PBR Strange behavior
Hi Omar, verify the source address of your packets. Your configuration is correct. Is possible that your packets didn't have a source address from 172.20.0.48/30 subnet. Try change the 'match ip address 160' by the following command: 'match interface FastEthernet0/0.73' This will match all packets coming from interface FastEthernet0/0.73. Another way is to rebuild your ACL 160 with the correct source address of your packets. Regards, Diogo On 7/2/07, omar parihuana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi List, I've configured an policy routing, however the packets don't match the policy. I re-checked the configuration and all seems fine, I don't know why that configuration don't work!!! (the packets traverse by default route and not by Next-hop configured into route-map. I've paste my configuration: ! interface FastEthernet0/0.73 encapsulation dot1Q 73 ip address 172.20.0.49 255.255.255.252 no ip redirects no ip proxy-arp ip policy route-map NEXT-HOP no cdp enable arp timeout 300 end ! ! route-map NEXT-HOP permit 10 match ip address 160 set interface Serial1/0:0 set ip next-hop 172.16.1.134 ! ! access-list 160 permit ip 172.20.0.48 0.0.0.3 any ! Thanks *The router is a Cisco 3640 with CEF Enabled that works like MPLS-PE router. -- Omar E.P.T - Certified Networking Professionals make better Connections! ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] Strange behavior in sh ip bgp neighbors x.y.z.w advertised-routes
Hello all, considering the scenario: router-AS1 -- router-AS2 In this AS1 bgp neighbor configuration I have a outbound policy that modify the attributes of routes. In this route-map OUT, I have a instance where I insert a route prepend. When I search for this route using the AS2 looking glass I can see the prepend, but when I issue the sh ip bgp neighbor x.y.z.w advertised-routes in router-AS1 I cannot find this prepend. This same behavior is observed in others BGP attributes like metric, local preference, etc. Our support said that the command sh ip bgp neighbors x.y.z.w adv show the routes before it cross the outbound policer. But the weird thing is, if in this outbound policy I put a deny instance for don't advertise the route to AS2, the route disappear from the output of command sh ip bgp nei x.y.z.w adv. Is there a command that shows the routes after it crosses the outbound policer ? Regards, Diogo ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
