Re: [clamav-users] Debian packaging
Hi there, On Tue, 31 Mar 2015, Torge Husfeldt wrote: I had to emergency-disable archive-scanning more than a month ago and still have no solution. Is there some reason that you can't compile ClamAV yourself? For a number of packages I prefer to do that rather than use the configurations supplied by Debian. Looks like, if I want to continue to protect ~10M domains in Shared Hosting using clamav I will have to ask my employer to provide a debian-lts-maintainer for it ... I hardly think that's necessary, but as presumably your employer operates for a profit, perhaps that entity would consider supporting Open Source in some way. Of course that wouldn't make it any more likely that I'd accept mail from its servers. :) -- 73, Ged. ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
Re: [clamav-users] Debian packaging
On Monday, March 30, 2015 06:37:52 PM Torge Husfeldt wrote: > Hi, > > sorry to warm up this _really_old_ topic. > > Am 11.02.2014 um 17:23 schrieb Jim Popovitch: > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Andrew Kelly wrote: > >> Nearly mid February 2014 now. 0.98.1 has been available for a > >> month already, and Debian is still stuck at 0.97.8. > > And one more year and one more security-related fix later still no solution. > > Welcome to Debian. ;-) If you want bleeding edge, don't use Debian > > Stable (use Debian Testing) > > In this light, it looks like "LTS" is a joke, too. > > I had to emergency-disable archive-scanning more than a month ago and > still have no solution. > Looks like, if I want to continue to protect ~10M domains in Shared > Hosting using clamav I will have to ask my employer to provide a > debian-lts-maintainer for it ... The Debian LTS is mostly managed by a small subset of Debian people that have decided to focus on it. They have published clamav updates, but are no doubt looking for help. See https://wiki.debian.org/LTS/Development . For releases supported by the Debian project, here's what's available right now: clamav | 0.98.5+dfsg-0+deb7u2 | wheezy clamav | 0.98.6+dfsg-0+deb7u1 | wheezy-p-u clamav | 0.98.6+dfsg-0+deb7u1 | wheezy-updates clamav | 0.98.6+dfsg-1| jessie clamav | 0.98.6+dfsg-1| sid (for those not up to speed on Debian specifics, what that means is the most current clamav release is available for all supported Debian releases) Scott K ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
Re: [clamav-users] Debian packaging
Hi, sorry to warm up this _really_old_ topic. Am 11.02.2014 um 17:23 schrieb Jim Popovitch: > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Andrew Kelly wrote: >> >> Nearly mid February 2014 now. 0.98.1 has been available for a >> month already, and Debian is still stuck at 0.97.8. And one more year and one more security-related fix later still no solution. > > Welcome to Debian. ;-) If you want bleeding edge, don't use Debian > Stable (use Debian Testing) In this light, it looks like "LTS" is a joke, too. I had to emergency-disable archive-scanning more than a month ago and still have no solution. Looks like, if I want to continue to protect ~10M domains in Shared Hosting using clamav I will have to ask my employer to provide a debian-lts-maintainer for it ... > >> Is there any kind of formal statement from the package maintainer, >> or is this simply an orphaned project? > > The Debian ClamAV Team *is* working on testing/packaging. The process > generally involves first solving Debian specific issues, as they > relate to ClamAV, in Debian Unstable and Testing. > > You can see that 0.98.1 is already in Testing and UnStable here: > http://packages.qa.debian.org/c/clamav.html > > On that page, you can view "todo" at the top middle to see the current > outstanding build/packaging issues. > > hth, > > -Jim P. > ___ > Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: > https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq > http://www.clamav.net/support/ml > Sorry for my rambling. -- Torge Husfeldt Senior Anti-Abuse Engineer Abuse-Department 1&1 International 1&1 Internet Service GmbH | Brauerstraße 50 | 76135 Karlsruhe | Germany Phone: +49 721 91374-4795 E-Mail: torge.husfe...@1und1.de | Web: www.1und1.de Hauptsitz Montabaur, Amtsgericht Montabaur, HRB 20141 Geschäftsführer: Frank Einhellinger, Uwe Lamnek, Jan Oetjen Member of United Internet Diese E-Mail kann vertrauliche und/oder gesetzlich geschützte Informationen enthalten. Wenn Sie nicht der bestimmungsgemäße Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten haben, unterrichten Sie bitte den Absender und vernichten Sie diese E-Mail. Anderen als dem bestimmungsgemäßen Adressaten ist untersagt, diese E-Mail zu speichern, weiterzuleiten oder ihren Inhalt auf welche Weise auch immer zu verwenden. This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that saving, distribution or use of the content of this e-mail in any way is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and delete the e-mail. ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
Re: [clamav-users] Debian packaging
Tried to spare the list another thank you, but I wasn't able to mail you directly. Sorry list. Dennis, in light of the value you've explicitly placed upon your time, thank you once again for all the explanation and for your efforts. Very much appreciated. >> dp - Unix wonk since 1980 Nice. Can't claim anything pre 90's, myself. Andy ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
Re: [clamav-users] Debian packaging
On 2/12/14, 6:29 AM, Andrew Kelly wrote: On Tue, 2014-02-11 at 21:28 -0800, Dennis Peterson wrote: On 2/11/14, 8:06 AM, Andrew Kelly wrote: So. So. Andy - You do know that this is the wrong list for complaints about Debian support, right? You might have better luck here: Thanks for the guidance, Dennis, much appreciated. I'm curious, though... I've seen half a dozen or more threads in the last few weeks that have precious little to do with the core business of this list. Why is it that you picked my mail (very much on topic in an existent thread, by the way) to play hall monitor? Is it just because you're seeing my name for the first time, or have you just not been reading everything posted to this list? At any rate, I'm running a farm of "stable" and "old-stable" deployments, the dep nightmare of pulling something from testing isn't really going to serve my customer base very well. And the 20 minutes.. well, were it that painless I'm sure half a dozen daily readers of this list would have already back-ported things months and months ago. Hope I haven't upset you, that's really not what I intended, and as I said, I'm quite grateful for your response. Andy I'm not upset - I'm retired. Time is important to me because there's just not as much left as there once was. In fact there never was, so I do what I can to manage time better. That means I don't wait for support people to do for me what I can do for myself. I've always built ClamAV from source in every environment I've installed it. Sometimes that is just "configure;make;make install", sometimes it is by editing a spec file and building the RPM. When I'm done it is fully integrated with my OS versions, file system layout, mailer, milters, logger, log rotator, startup scripts, and password/group files. It is a reliable and repeatable process. Educating, or informing you is not at all the same thing as picking on you. I've not picked on you at all, of course. I may not have educated you, either, but not from a lack of trying. In the case of the Debian package availability I'm helping you save time. Nobody here is responsible for Debian packages. ClamAV is a Cisco company. Debian is an SPI company. They can help you or at least inform you regarding deployment schedules. Anything you get here is going to be second hand. Secondly, by advising you that you, yes you, can build these packages to get you through a crisis is good advice. I'll get to what is a crisis shortly. Here's the page you need to see to build Debian packages - read the first section carefully: http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/index.en.html Here's a piece of it: -- 1.1. Social dynamics of Debian Here are some observations of Debian's social dynamics, presented in the hope that it will prepare you for interactions with Debian. We all are volunteers. You cannot impose on others what to do. You should be motivated to do things by yourself. --- You inherit that when you choose Debian. So why would you want to have this skill? Because sometimes there is a crisis and you should be able to deal with it in a timely, disciplined manner. I will tell you though that the change from 9.8 to 9.8.1 is definitely not a crisis and it is hoped that some sense of perspective will be imparted. That being there's no hurry. Read the Changelog before going into crisis mode. If there really is a crisis it is your responsibility to manage it. The volunteers will likely up the priority to get the build ready because they likely are also customers. But never forget they are volunteers and are not responsible for solving your crisis. More links: http://packages.debian.org/stable/clamav This will show you who your volunteers are and even how to get in touch with them. http://packages.debian.org/stable/allpackages This is the list of stable packages you can use today http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages This is the top of the package tree where you can find everything you need to know about Debian packages. dp - Unix wonk since 1980 ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
Re: [clamav-users] Debian packaging
Greg Folkert wrote: > Debian Stable is that. If you must have 0.98.1, you should also be using > "backports"... at least I used to until I just used Sid for everything. > Backports help extend Stable's longevity and "freshness" a bit... but it > is no guarantee 0.98.1 will be there. Actually it should filter down once it's gone through some testing. "Stable" means different things to different packages - and AFAIK policy hasn't changed much in terms of updating "volatile" security related packages like ClamAV. Matthew Newton wrote: > Debian's policy is to ensure that stable means stable - so they > only generally apply security patches. There was a "volatile" > repository once as they realised that software like ClamAV needs > updating more but conflicted with normal policy; it looks like > it's been replaced, but I don't know if they still maintain the > ClamAV package there. It is still there, just under a different name - should be covered by the /updates (eg wheezy/updates) source. http://www.debian.org/security/ As for installing the update, as pointed out there are several options. If you have wheezy/updates in your apt-sources list then it should appear (eventually) after passing through Debian's quality processes. If you want it sooner, then pull it from testing - something I've done with a few packages from time to time. I've found that mostly things are "fairly reliable" by the time they reach testing - but it's worth a scan of the bugs list first. Or if you want bleeding edge - either install from upstream source, or install from unstable. Unstable can be, well, unstable - so you roll your dice and take your chances. Personally, I try to avoid installing from source. Not because I can't do it (I have done it when I've had no option), but I have to consider maintainability - especially if I've moved on and the system gets inherited by someone with "limited" Linux/FOSS skills. YMMV - what you do on a home system (only you to consider) or in an environment where there are plenty of experienced Linux/FOSS admins is one thing; what you do when there's no such people around is another. ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
Re: [clamav-users] Debian packaging
Hi Andy, On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 03:29:28PM +0100, Andrew Kelly wrote: > At any rate, I'm running a farm of "stable" and "old-stable" > deployments, the dep nightmare of pulling something from testing > isn't really going to serve my customer base very well. And > the 20 minutes.. well, were it that painless I'm sure half a > dozen daily readers of this list would have already back-ported > things months and months ago. Yeah, we did :-p We run Debian stable for our mail systems. I just build local packages for the volatile stuff like ClamAV and SpamAssassin. I guess I have to rebuild twice a year or so, and it's pretty trivial when you've done it once - copy the debian/ directory over, update the changelog and rebuild. There are very occasionally a few things that need tweaking to get it to build with the new version. Debian's policy is to ensure that stable means stable - so they only generally apply security patches. There was a "volatile" repository once as they realised that software like ClamAV needs updating more but conflicted with normal policy; it looks like it's been replaced, but I don't know if they still maintain the ClamAV package there. Cheers, Matthew -- Matthew Newton, Ph.D. Systems Specialist, Infrastructure Services, I.T. Services, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, United Kingdom For IT help contact helpdesk extn. 2253, ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
Re: [clamav-users] Debian packaging
On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 15:29 +0100, Andrew Kelly wrote: > On Tue, 2014-02-11 at 21:28 -0800, Dennis Peterson wrote: > > On 2/11/14, 8:06 AM, Andrew Kelly wrote: > > > > > So. > > > So. Andy - You do know that this is the wrong list for complaints about > > Debian support, right? You might have better luck here: > > > Thanks for the guidance, Dennis, much appreciated. > > I'm curious, though... I've seen half a dozen or more threads > in the last few weeks that have precious little to do with > the core business of this list. Why is it that you picked my > mail (very much on topic in an existent thread, by the way) > to play hall monitor? > Is it just because you're seeing my name for the first time, > or have you just not been reading everything posted to this > list? > > At any rate, I'm running a farm of "stable" and "old-stable" > deployments, the dep nightmare of pulling something from testing > isn't really going to serve my customer base very well. And > the 20 minutes.. well, were it that painless I'm sure half a > dozen daily readers of this list would have already back-ported > things months and months ago. > > Hope I haven't upset you, that's really not what I intended, > and as I said, I'm quite grateful for your response. > > Andy The reason he pointed it out and "picked" on it... it is a resolved issue with regards to this list. The Debian Maintainer has release 0.98.1 into Sid and Testing. This Bug is closed. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=727027 Debian Stable is that. If you must have 0.98.1, you should also be using "backports"... at least I used to until I just used Sid for everything. Backports help extend Stable's longevity and "freshness" a bit... but it is no guarantee 0.98.1 will be there. This thread you happen to pickup on, was indeed resolved by the upload to incoming for Sid of 0.98.1... dunno there isn't much more to say than you need to light a fire under the Debian side of things to get it into stable. -- greg folkert - systems administration and support web:donor.com email: g...@donor.com phone: 877-751-3300 x416 direct: 616-328-6449 (direct dial and fax) "We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars." -- Oscar Wilde ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
Re: [clamav-users] Debian packaging
On Tue, 2014-02-11 at 21:28 -0800, Dennis Peterson wrote: > On 2/11/14, 8:06 AM, Andrew Kelly wrote: > > > So. > So. Andy - You do know that this is the wrong list for complaints about > Debian support, right? You might have better luck here: Thanks for the guidance, Dennis, much appreciated. I'm curious, though... I've seen half a dozen or more threads in the last few weeks that have precious little to do with the core business of this list. Why is it that you picked my mail (very much on topic in an existent thread, by the way) to play hall monitor? Is it just because you're seeing my name for the first time, or have you just not been reading everything posted to this list? At any rate, I'm running a farm of "stable" and "old-stable" deployments, the dep nightmare of pulling something from testing isn't really going to serve my customer base very well. And the 20 minutes.. well, were it that painless I'm sure half a dozen daily readers of this list would have already back-ported things months and months ago. Hope I haven't upset you, that's really not what I intended, and as I said, I'm quite grateful for your response. Andy ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
Re: [clamav-users] Debian packaging
On 2/11/14, 8:06 AM, Andrew Kelly wrote: So. Nearly mid February 2014 now. 0.98.1 has been available for a month already, and Debian is still stuck at 0.97.8. Is there any kind of formal statement from the package maintainer, or is this simply an orphaned project? Andy So. Andy - You do know that this is the wrong list for complaints about Debian support, right? You might have better luck here: http://www.debian.org/support#maintainers but the easiest way to get new packages early is to be a package maintainer even if you are the only customer. It is less than 20 minutes work to build a package from source. A little longer than that to learn how, but the ability to do so pays off. dp ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
Re: [clamav-users] Debian packaging
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Andrew Kelly wrote: > > Nearly mid February 2014 now. 0.98.1 has been available for a > month already, and Debian is still stuck at 0.97.8. Welcome to Debian. ;-) If you want bleeding edge, don't use Debian Stable (use Debian Testing) > Is there any kind of formal statement from the package maintainer, > or is this simply an orphaned project? The Debian ClamAV Team *is* working on testing/packaging. The process generally involves first solving Debian specific issues, as they relate to ClamAV, in Debian Unstable and Testing. You can see that 0.98.1 is already in Testing and UnStable here: http://packages.qa.debian.org/c/clamav.html On that page, you can view "todo" at the top middle to see the current outstanding build/packaging issues. hth, -Jim P. ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
Re: [clamav-users] Debian packaging
On Wed, 2014-01-08 at 10:55 -0500, Greg Folkert wrote: > On Mon, 2013-12-16 at 10:22 +, Simon Hobson wrote: > > Does anyone know what the situation is with Debian packages ? > > It's been something like 2 months now and 0.98 still doesn't appear to have > > made it to unstable, let alone testing. > > > > I'm assuming this also affects Debian derived distros like Mint and Ubuntu. > > I've also submitted "extra information" to this bug. > > I see that there was some update last month, after this post. Scott > Kitterman apparently is unable to fix a patching problem for use with > Debian. http://kitterman.com/debian/ look at the "last_operation.log" > > No progress since Nov 15th, 2013. I'm disappointed. Richard Cognot > offered some advice from the evidence in the log. > > Hoping we can get some more traction. Perhaps, I'll re-subscribe to > Debian-Devel and make a bit of an inquiry/noise on the package there... > or the dreaded Debian-User. So. Nearly mid February 2014 now. 0.98.1 has been available for a month already, and Debian is still stuck at 0.97.8. Is there any kind of formal statement from the package maintainer, or is this simply an orphaned project? Andy ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
Re: [clamav-users] Debian packaging
On Mon, 2013-12-16 at 10:22 +, Simon Hobson wrote: > Does anyone know what the situation is with Debian packages ? > It's been something like 2 months now and 0.98 still doesn't appear to have > made it to unstable, let alone testing. > > I'm assuming this also affects Debian derived distros like Mint and Ubuntu. I've also submitted "extra information" to this bug. I see that there was some update last month, after this post. Scott Kitterman apparently is unable to fix a patching problem for use with Debian. http://kitterman.com/debian/ look at the "last_operation.log" No progress since Nov 15th, 2013. I'm disappointed. Richard Cognot offered some advice from the evidence in the log. Hoping we can get some more traction. Perhaps, I'll re-subscribe to Debian-Devel and make a bit of an inquiry/noise on the package there... or the dreaded Debian-User. -- greg folkert - systems administration and support web:donor.com email: g...@donor.com phone: 877-751-3300 x416 direct: 616-328-6449 (direct dial and fax) "While we are postponing, life speeds by." -- Lucius Annaeus Seneca ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
Re: [clamav-users] Debian packaging
On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 03:11:47AM +, Joel Esler (jesler) wrote: > > > On Dec 17, 2013, at 5:28, "Simon Hobson" wrote: > > > > Well since no-one's come back with something like "the package maintainer's > > gone AWOL" or similar, I'll keep bumping that bug ticket. Does seem > > strange, I don't recall such a long delay in the past. > > Updating from source isn't really an option since I need to leave these > > systems maintainable by people who need the simplicity of "apt-get upgrade". > > > I haven't had any contact with the package maintainer. That doesn't mean a > thing though. I haven't went through and collected the names of the package > maintainers like I did for our other projects here at Sourcefire. > > I'll out that on my to do list. > > In fact, if you want to help me out, if you are a package maintainer for > ClamAV, write me an email off list, and I'll start collecting the names. > > Joel I'm not a Debian Developer nor current maintainer, but I would be happy to help maintaining ClamAV packages. Please contact me off list if my help is needed. --- Henri Salo ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
Re: [clamav-users] Debian packaging
> On Dec 17, 2013, at 5:28, "Simon Hobson" wrote: > > Well since no-one's come back with something like "the package maintainer's > gone AWOL" or similar, I'll keep bumping that bug ticket. Does seem strange, > I don't recall such a long delay in the past. > Updating from source isn't really an option since I need to leave these > systems maintainable by people who need the simplicity of "apt-get upgrade". I haven't had any contact with the package maintainer. That doesn't mean a thing though. I haven't went through and collected the names of the package maintainers like I did for our other projects here at Sourcefire. I'll out that on my to do list. In fact, if you want to help me out, if you are a package maintainer for ClamAV, write me an email off list, and I'll start collecting the names. Joel ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
Re: [clamav-users] Debian packaging
Greg Folkert wrote: >Simon, >Why not open a Bug, or look to see if there is one. Oh wait: >In Pending Upload bugs for >http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=727027 > >Just gotta look. Rending since Oct 2013 Yes indeed. >And lookit that, some "Simon Hobson" > >Commented on it Fri, 15 Nov 2013 9:54:48 +. And look what a positive response it's had so far ! >Make noise on the list or continue to bomb the bug(s)... This place >ain't gonna be helpful in this regard. Well since no-one's come back with something like "the package maintainer's gone AWOL" or similar, I'll keep bumping that bug ticket. Does seem strange, I don't recall such a long delay in the past. Updating from source isn't really an option since I need to leave these systems maintainable by people who need the simplicity of "apt-get upgrade". ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
Re: [clamav-users] Debian packaging
On Mon, 2013-12-16 at 21:03 +0700, k...@crypto.my.id wrote: > On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 08:51:16 -0500 > Greg Folkert wrote: > > > Koko > > Ubuntu is not Debian. Most packages that are "Daemon" > > are failing to work because of "upstart"... and library > > differences. > > > sorry for the noise.. alternative build from source. Wasn't a reprimand, just a clarification. -- greg folkert - systems administration and support web:donor.com email: g...@donor.com phone: 877-751-3300 x416 direct: 616-328-6449 (direct dial and fax) "Life is an adventure in forgiveness." -- Norman Cousins ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
Re: [clamav-users] Debian packaging
On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 08:51:16 -0500 Greg Folkert wrote: > Koko > Ubuntu is not Debian. Most packages that are "Daemon" > are failing to work because of "upstart"... and library > differences. > sorry for the noise.. alternative build from source. ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
Re: [clamav-users] Debian packaging
On Mon, 2013-12-16 at 18:05 +0700, k...@crypto.my.id wrote: > On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 10:22:25 + > "Simon Hobson" wrote: > > > Does anyone know what the situation is with Debian packages ? > > It's been something like 2 months now and 0.98 still doesn't appear to have > > made it to unstable, let alone testing. > > > > I'm assuming this also affects Debian derived distros like Mint and Ubuntu. > > > for ubuntu available here: Koko Ubuntu is not Debian. Most packages that are "Daemon" are failing to work because of "upstart"... and library differences. Now many debian packages can go into Ubuntu... just not lightly that other way. Simon, Why not open a Bug, or look to see if there is one. Oh wait: In Pending Upload bugs for http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=727027 Just gotta look. Rending since Oct 2013 And lookit that, some "Simon Hobson" Commented on it Fri, 15 Nov 2013 9:54:48 +. Make noise on the list or continue to bomb the bug(s)... This place ain't gonna be helpful in this regard. -- greg folkert - systems administration and support web:donor.com email: g...@donor.com phone: 877-751-3300 x416 direct: 616-328-6449 (direct dial and fax) "Life is an adventure in forgiveness." -- Norman Cousins ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
Re: [clamav-users] Debian packaging
Hi there, On Mon, 16 Dec 2013, Simon Hobson wrote: Does anyone know what the situation is with Debian packages ? http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=pkg-clamav-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org -- 73, Ged. ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
Re: [clamav-users] Debian packaging
On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 10:22:25 + "Simon Hobson" wrote: > Does anyone know what the situation is with Debian packages ? > It's been something like 2 months now and 0.98 still doesn't appear to have > made it to unstable, let alone testing. > > I'm assuming this also affects Debian derived distros like Mint and Ubuntu. > for ubuntu available here: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-clamav/+archive/ppa https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ClamAV -- WUP ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
[clamav-users] Debian packaging
Does anyone know what the situation is with Debian packages ? It's been something like 2 months now and 0.98 still doesn't appear to have made it to unstable, let alone testing. I'm assuming this also affects Debian derived distros like Mint and Ubuntu. ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
