Stus-List 34+ transom thru-hulls

2015-06-15 Thread Jean-Francois J Rivard via CnC-List
Hi David, 

Congrats on getting the 34+. I've owned mine for 3 years and still think I 
could not have possibly gotten a better boat for what we do.  The promise 
is that is gives you plentiful room and comfort at the marina / anchor and 
runs like a bat out of he$$ around the cans..   It does just that. 

All your questions are really straightforward. 

Exhaust hose:  I replaced mine last year, it's not that bad. Your idea of 
connecting the old one to the new one is excellent.  I just wrestled my 
old one out and taped a fiberglass wiring rod to the new one to pull some 
/ guide it.  The trick is to remove all the aft stateroom cushions then 
remove the fuel tank access panel and the wooden blocks that are screwed / 
wedged-in securing the fuel tank and find a way to jack-up tank to 
facilitate threading the new hose in under it ( I used 2 x 2's) . 

The challenge to thread the new hose is to line it up between the exposed 
strut bolts.  Stick to the original hose construction / diameter and 
you'll be fine.  It's a bit of a sweaty wrestling match but you and 1 
other guy should be able to knock it out in less than 1 hour. 

Through-Hulls 

None of what you mentioned is below the waterline at rest. They get 
dipped-in some when motoring or sailing in excess of 5 or so knots but 
that's nothing that the standard siphon loops can't handle. The 34+ is the 
last of the Canadian CC's and after 35 + odd years of designing racer 
cruisers they had it down.. Rob Ball knew what he was doing. 

FYI, all through hulls on mine are Marelon.  I close them all everytime I 
leave the boat and they works well, 

Also, there are no cockpit or deck scuppers on the boat.  All cockpit 
/deck water simply flows out the stern / swim platform area in a modern 
open stern / sport boat style.  On my boat there's a drain for the propane 
locker, also well designed.  No need to seal / mess with it as propane is 
heavier than air and flows down the drain like water with its exit above 
the waterline at rest  There's no quadrant well.  On my boat The rudder 
shaft goes up to the quadrant that is mounted on top and flush with the 
cockpit sub-floor.  All that is easily accessible by simply removing the 
triangular fiberglass cover. 

Feel free to PM me for more details on how to tune the boat  / other 
questions of you want. 


-Francois Rivard
1990 34+ Take Five
Lake Lanier, GA

 





Subject: Re: Stus-List 34+ transom thru-hulls
Message-ID: snt152-w7315fc52d9f459dde543fda0...@phx.gbl
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

I said appear to be below the waterline because the boat's not in the 
water, isn't going in the water anytime soon, and I've never actually 
seen one of these in the water :)  All four thru-hulls are under the 
transom counter and below the boot stripe as well as below the waterline
 as defined by the existing bottom paint, so I have to assume they are 
submerged with the boat floating level.  Given their location in the 
bowels of the stern lazarettes, I know accessing them is a pain but I'm 
paranoid enough that I'd close them when I'm leaving the boat on her 
mooring and not returning for a span of days at a time.  On second 
though, I'd have to leave the two small ones open because those are 
scuppers, so no sense in valves on them at all.

Here's a pic of the two port side thru hulls, big one is the exhaust.  2 
more on the stbd side in the same configuration.

So I'm the proud new owner of a '90 34+, and the first project I bit off 
was replacement of the exhaust hose from the muffer back, including the 
thru-hull.

First off, this is not going to be fun because the hose runs under the 
fuel tank and span of the cockpit under the water heater where it is 
completely inaccessible.  I'm hoping I'll be able to pull the new hose 
through by clamping it to the old hose with a double-ended barb, but it 
seems like it's an awful tight fit under the tank.  If anyone else has 
done this job and has any suggestions, I'm all ears.

Second, the thru-hulls themselves.  There are 4 thru-hulls just under the 
transom - the exhaust, the two drains for the propane tank  steering 
quadrant well, and the bilge pump.  All 4 are plastic mushroom-head 
thru-hulls, and I want to replace at least the exhaust thru-hull with a 
new marelon one.  Question:  none of these thru-hulls have seacocks on 
them, which seems odd (and unwise) to me because they appear to be below 
the waterline.  What are your thoughts on putting a marelon ball valve on 
the new thru hull while I'm at it?  I'm tempted to replace all 4 of them 
with new thru-hull and valves.  Am I just being paranoid?

Thanks all.  I'm thrilled to have this boat and I'm sure I'll be pestering 
the heck out of this board!

-Dave
 1990 CC 34+ Faith Anne



___

Email address:
CnC-List@cnc-list.com
To change your list preferences, including unsubscribing -- go to the bottom of 
page at:
http://cnc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/cnc

Re: Stus-List 34+ transom thru-hulls

2015-06-15 Thread davepulaski via CnC-List
Thanks for all the info François!   Yes I've come to accept that those stern 
thru-hulls are in fact above DWL, regardless of what the painted waterline 
says.  I'm leaning towards not going to seacocks now, probably will at least 
replace the old thru-hull though with a new marelon one while I'm in there.  
Thanks for the tip on jacking up the fuel tank!

You're correct - the 2 small lines are for draining the propane tank 
compartment under the quadrant panel.  I like that the cockpit doesn't need 
scuppers!

While I have you - what are your thoughts on the rod rigging on these boats?  
AFAIK, she has all her original standing rigging.   Yes she's been only in 
fresh water so far, but the age still gives me pause.   Have you rerigged yet?

Dave
1990 34+ Faith Anne

Sent from my T-Mobile Galaxy Note 2

 Original message 
From: Jean-Francois J Rivard jfriv...@us.ibm.com 
Date: 06/15/2015  10:45  (GMT-05:00) 
To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com 
Cc: davepula...@hotmail.com 
Subject: Stus-List 34+ transom thru-hulls 
 
Hi David, 

Congrats on getting the 34+. I've owned mine for 3 years and still think I 
could not have possibly gotten a better boat for what we do.  The promise is 
that is gives you plentiful room and comfort at the marina / anchor and runs 
like a bat out of he$$ around the cans..   It does just that.   

All your questions are really straightforward. 

Exhaust hose:  I replaced mine last year, it's not that bad. Your idea of 
connecting the old one to the new one is excellent.  I just wrestled my old one 
out and taped a fiberglass wiring rod to the new one to pull some / guide it.  
The trick is to remove all the aft stateroom cushions then remove the fuel tank 
access panel and the wooden blocks that are screwed / wedged-in securing the 
fuel tank and find a way to jack-up tank to facilitate threading the new hose 
in under it ( I used 2 x 2's) .  

The challenge to thread the new hose is to line it up between the exposed strut 
bolts.  Stick to the original hose construction / diameter and you'll be fine.  
It's a bit of a sweaty wrestling match but you and 1 other guy should be able 
to knock it out in less than 1 hour. 

Through-Hulls  

None of what you mentioned is below the waterline at rest. They get dipped-in 
some when motoring or sailing in excess of 5 or so knots but that's nothing 
that the standard siphon loops can't handle. The 34+ is the last of the 
Canadian CC's and after 35 + odd years of designing racer cruisers they had it 
down.. Rob Ball knew what he was doing. 

FYI, all through hulls on mine are Marelon.  I close them all everytime I leave 
the boat and they works well, 

Also, there are no cockpit or deck scuppers on the boat.  All cockpit /deck 
water simply flows out the stern / swim platform area in a modern open stern / 
sport boat style.  On my boat there's a drain for the propane locker, also well 
designed.  No need to seal / mess with it as propane is heavier than air and 
flows down the drain like water with its exit above the waterline at rest  
There's no quadrant well.  On my boat The rudder shaft goes up to the quadrant 
that is mounted on top and flush with the cockpit sub-floor.  All that is 
easily accessible by simply removing the triangular fiberglass cover.  

Feel free to PM me for more details on how to tune the boat  / other questions 
of you want. 


-Francois Rivard
1990 34+ Take Five
Lake Lanier, GA

 





Subject: Re: Stus-List 34+ transom thru-hulls
Message-ID: snt152-w7315fc52d9f459dde543fda0...@phx.gbl
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

I said appear to be below the waterline because the boat's not in the 
water, isn't going in the water anytime soon, and I've never actually 
seen one of these in the water :)  All four thru-hulls are under the 
transom counter and below the boot stripe as well as below the waterline
 as defined by the existing bottom paint, so I have to assume they are 
submerged with the boat floating level.  Given their location in the 
bowels of the stern lazarettes, I know accessing them is a pain but I'm 
paranoid enough that I'd close them when I'm leaving the boat on her 
mooring and not returning for a span of days at a time.  On second 
though, I'd have to leave the two small ones open because those are 
scuppers, so no sense in valves on them at all.

Here's a pic of the two port side thru hulls, big one is the exhaust.  2 more 
on the stbd side in the same configuration.

So I'm the proud new owner of a '90 34+, and the first project I bit off was 
replacement of the exhaust hose from the muffer back, including the thru-hull.

First off, this is not going to be fun because the hose runs under the fuel 
tank and span of the cockpit under the water heater where it is completely 
inaccessible.  I'm hoping I'll be able to pull the new hose through by clamping 
it to the old hose with a double-ended barb, but it seems like it's an awful 
tight fit under the tank.  If anyone else has done

Re: Stus-List 34+ transom thru-hulls

2015-06-15 Thread Jean-Francois J Rivard via CnC-List
Rod Rigging.  Mine is also original and the boat has been freshwater for 
all its life except for 4 years.  I discussed the rig with one of the few 
(And be most accounts: the best) factory certified Navtec guys in the 
southeast  (Rick Zern) and his advice was: Have your local guy take a look 
at it (While it's down if possible) or you can look at it yourself. Here's 
what you look for:  No kinks, make sure the tangs (mast attachment ball / 
socket joints) are not deformed, can rotate smoothly, and are free of 
rust.  Same with the eyes / toggles / turnbuckles: free of rust, smooth 
turning. If that passes muster, don't worry about it. 

As you know, rod riggings are extremely stout and don't really stretch 
much at all.  If it has been abused, mistreated, or over-stressed in a 
storm, the aluminum mast structure around the tang area will deform,  same 
for the threads on the turnbuckles: They will get distorted long before 
the rods or heads get damaged. 

Rick told me that being a certfied Navtec rigger he decided to remove his 
and have it lab tested.  Keep in mind his boat (J-boat) had been raced 
hard in salt water for  15-20+ years / his rod rigging was original. 
Results after the dye and destructive tests done: Nothing wrong.  In his 
words:  It was a waste of money and efforts. 

His words (Again) if you're about to embark on extended ocean crossing 
passages then by all means spend the money to get work done as insurance. 
For the rest of us lake and coastal cruisers:  Keep sailing and taking 
reasonable care of your rig. 

Regards, 

-Francois
1990 34+ Take Five
Lake Lanier, GA



















 




From:   davepulaski davepula...@hotmail.com
To: Jean-Francois J Rivard/Atlanta/IBM@IBMUS, cnc-list@cnc-list.com
Date:   06/15/2015 11:26 AM
Subject:RE: Stus-List 34+ transom thru-hulls



Thanks for all the info François!   Yes I've come to accept that those 
stern thru-hulls are in fact above DWL, regardless of what the painted 
waterline says.  I'm leaning towards not going to seacocks now, probably 
will at least replace the old thru-hull though with a new marelon one 
while I'm in there.  Thanks for the tip on jacking up the fuel tank!

You're correct - the 2 small lines are for draining the propane tank 
compartment under the quadrant panel.  I like that the cockpit doesn't 
need scuppers!

While I have you - what are your thoughts on the rod rigging on these 
boats?  AFAIK, she has all her original standing rigging.   Yes she's been 
only in fresh water so far, but the age still gives me pause.   Have you 
rerigged yet?

Dave
1990 34+ Faith Anne

Sent from my T-Mobile Galaxy Note 2


 Original message 
From: Jean-Francois J Rivard jfriv...@us.ibm.com 
Date: 06/15/2015 10:45 (GMT-05:00) 
To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com 
Cc: davepula...@hotmail.com 
Subject: Stus-List 34+ transom thru-hulls 


Hi David, 

Congrats on getting the 34+. I've owned mine for 3 years and still think I 
could not have possibly gotten a better boat for what we do.  The promise 
is that is gives you plentiful room and comfort at the marina / anchor and 
runs like a bat out of he$$ around the cans..   It does just that.   

All your questions are really straightforward. 

Exhaust hose:  I replaced mine last year, it's not that bad. Your idea of 
connecting the old one to the new one is excellent.  I just wrestled my 
old one out and taped a fiberglass wiring rod to the new one to pull some 
/ guide it.  The trick is to remove all the aft stateroom cushions then 
remove the fuel tank access panel and the wooden blocks that are screwed / 
wedged-in securing the fuel tank and find a way to jack-up tank to 
facilitate threading the new hose in under it ( I used 2 x 2's) .  

The challenge to thread the new hose is to line it up between the exposed 
strut bolts.  Stick to the original hose construction / diameter and 
you'll be fine.  It's a bit of a sweaty wrestling match but you and 1 
other guy should be able to knock it out in less than 1 hour. 

Through-Hulls  

None of what you mentioned is below the waterline at rest. They get 
dipped-in some when motoring or sailing in excess of 5 or so knots but 
that's nothing that the standard siphon loops can't handle. The 34+ is the 
last of the Canadian CC's and after 35 + odd years of designing racer 
cruisers they had it down.. Rob Ball knew what he was doing. 

FYI, all through hulls on mine are Marelon.  I close them all everytime I 
leave the boat and they works well, 

Also, there are no cockpit or deck scuppers on the boat.  All cockpit 
/deck water simply flows out the stern / swim platform area in a modern 
open stern / sport boat style.  On my boat there's a drain for the propane 
locker, also well designed.  No need to seal / mess with it as propane is 
heavier than air and flows down the drain like water with its exit above 
the waterline at rest  There's no quadrant well.  On my boat The rudder 
shaft goes up to the quadrant that is mounted

Re: Stus-List 34+ transom thru-hulls

2015-06-15 Thread Joel Aronson via CnC-List
FWIW, Navtec recommends re-heading every 10 years or 10,000 miles.

Joel
35/3
The Office

On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Jean-Francois J Rivard via CnC-List 
cnc-list@cnc-list.com wrote:

 Rod Rigging.  Mine is also original and the boat has been freshwater for
 all its life except for 4 years.  I discussed the rig with one of the few
 (And be most accounts: the best) factory certified Navtec guys in the
 southeast  (Rick Zern) and his advice was: Have your local guy take a look
 at it (While it's down if possible) or you can look at it yourself.  Here's
 what you look for:  No kinks, make sure the tangs (mast attachment ball /
 socket joints) are not deformed, can rotate smoothly, and are free of
 rust.  Same with the eyes / toggles / turnbuckles: free of rust, smooth
 turning. If that passes muster, don't worry about it.

 As you know, rod riggings are extremely stout and don't really stretch
 much at all.  If it has been abused, mistreated, or over-stressed in a
 storm, the aluminum mast structure around the tang area will deform,  same
 for the threads on the turnbuckles: They will get distorted long before the
 rods or heads get damaged.

 Rick told me that being a certfied Navtec rigger he decided to remove his
 and have it lab tested.  Keep in mind his boat (J-boat) had been raced hard
 in salt water for  15-20+ years / his rod rigging was original.  Results
 after the dye and destructive tests done: Nothing wrong.  In his words:  It
 was a waste of money and efforts.

 His words (Again) if you're about to embark on extended ocean crossing
 passages then by all means spend the money to get work done as insurance.
 For the rest of us lake and coastal cruisers:  Keep sailing and taking
 reasonable care of your rig.

 Regards,

 -Francois
 1990 34+ Take Five
 Lake Lanier, GA





 From:davepulaski davepula...@hotmail.com
 To:Jean-Francois J Rivard/Atlanta/IBM@IBMUS, cnc-list@cnc-list.com
 Date:06/15/2015 11:26 AM
 Subject:RE: Stus-List 34+ transom thru-hulls
 --



 Thanks for all the info François!   Yes I've come to accept that those
 stern thru-hulls are in fact above DWL, regardless of what the painted
 waterline says.  I'm leaning towards not going to seacocks now, probably
 will at least replace the old thru-hull though with a new marelon one while
 I'm in there.  Thanks for the tip on jacking up the fuel tank!

 You're correct - the 2 small lines are for draining the propane tank
 compartment under the quadrant panel.  I like that the cockpit doesn't need
 scuppers!

 While I have you - what are your thoughts on the rod rigging on these
 boats?  AFAIK, she has all her original standing rigging.   Yes she's been
 only in fresh water so far, but the age still gives me pause.   Have you
 rerigged yet?

 Dave
 1990 34+ Faith Anne

 Sent from my T-Mobile Galaxy Note 2


  Original message 
 From: Jean-Francois J Rivard jfriv...@us.ibm.com
 Date: 06/15/2015 10:45 (GMT-05:00)
 To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
 Cc: davepula...@hotmail.com
 Subject: Stus-List 34+ transom thru-hulls


 Hi David,

 Congrats on getting the 34+. I've owned mine for 3 years and still think I
 could not have possibly gotten a better boat for what we do.  The promise
 is that is gives you plentiful room and comfort at the marina / anchor and
 runs like a bat out of he$$ around the cans..   It does just that.

 All your questions are really straightforward.

 Exhaust hose:  I replaced mine last year, it's not that bad. Your idea of
 connecting the old one to the new one is excellent.  I just wrestled my old
 one out and taped a fiberglass wiring rod to the new one to pull some /
 guide it.  The trick is to remove all the aft stateroom cushions then
 remove the fuel tank access panel and the wooden blocks that are screwed /
 wedged-in securing the fuel tank and find a way to jack-up tank to
 facilitate threading the new hose in under it ( I used 2 x 2's) .

 The challenge to thread the new hose is to line it up between the exposed
 strut bolts.  Stick to the original hose construction / diameter and you'll
 be fine.  It's a bit of a sweaty wrestling match but you and 1 other guy
 should be able to knock it out in less than 1 hour.

 Through-Hulls

 None of what you mentioned is below the waterline at rest. They get
 dipped-in some when motoring or sailing in excess of 5 or so knots but
 that's nothing that the standard siphon loops can't handle. The 34+ is the
 last of the Canadian CC's and after 35 + odd years of designing racer
 cruisers they had it down.. Rob Ball knew what he was doing.

 FYI, all through hulls on mine are Marelon.  I close them all everytime I
 leave the boat and they works well,

 Also, there are no cockpit or deck scuppers on the boat.  All cockpit
 /deck water simply flows out the stern / swim platform area in a modern
 open stern / sport boat style.  On my boat there's a drain for the propane
 locker, also well designed.  No need

Stus-List 34+ transom thru-hulls

2015-06-15 Thread Jean-Francois J Rivard via CnC-List
I have seen that, which is the lawyer approved, blanket cover, we're in 
the business of selling you more new stuff statement. 

I did ask Rick about that he said:  It depends where the boat is used / 
how it's used / what conditions it sails or stays in. 

If in doubt, have it looked at by a qualified rigger (I did) 


Regards, 

-Francois Rivard
1990 34+ Take five
Lake Lanier, GA


Message: 2
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 12:22:13 -0400
From: Joel Aronson joel.aron...@gmail.com
To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com cnc-list@cnc-list.com
Subject: Re: Stus-List 34+ transom thru-hulls
Message-ID:
 cael16p88jc+oczwqqva+m7p3u-iddjjzusmj_qbdyd6k5k-...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

FWIW, Navtec recommends re-heading every 10 years or 10,000 miles.

Joel
35/3
The Office
Regards



___

Email address:
CnC-List@cnc-list.com
To change your list preferences, including unsubscribing -- go to the bottom of 
page at:
http://cnc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/cnc-list_cnc-list.com



Re: Stus-List 34+ transom thru-hulls

2015-06-15 Thread Rick Brass via CnC-List
Stainless steel would be a much better choice than Marlon if you do decide to 
replace the exhaust through hull. And a proper exhaust through hull will have a 
flap built into it that will keep a following sea from entering the exhaust 
hose (and a loop at least 18” above the waterline between the muffler and the 
through hull to ensure that water does not get into the muffler and engine).

 

When I replaced the transom exhaust on Imzadi in 2010 (the OEM fitting was 1 ½” 
and pointed up at about 20-30 degrees, and sprayed a rooster tail out the back 
of the boat), I bought a 2” exhaust through hull on EBay for a bit over $50. 
Here is an example that is on EBay right now, though it is probably too large 
in diameter for your boat: 
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Sea-Dog-Corp-Exhaust-Thru-Hull-2-1-2-SS-521125-/141686562677?hash=item20fd2d5f75
 
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Sea-Dog-Corp-Exhaust-Thru-Hull-2-1-2-SS-521125-/141686562677?hash=item20fd2d5f75vxp=mtr
 vxp=mtr

 

 

Rick Brass

Imzadi  CC 38 mk 2

la Belle Aurore CC 25 mk1

Washington, NC

 

 

 

 

From: CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On Behalf Of davepulaski 
via CnC-List
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 11:26 AM
To: Jean-Francois J Rivard; cnc-list@cnc-list.com
Cc: davepulaski
Subject: Re: Stus-List 34+ transom thru-hulls

 

Thanks for all the info François!   Yes I've come to accept that those stern 
thru-hulls are in fact above DWL, regardless of what the painted waterline 
says.  I'm leaning towards not going to seacocks now, probably will at least 
replace the old thru-hull though with a new marelon one while I'm in there.  
Thanks for the tip on jacking up the fuel tank!

 

You're correct - the 2 small lines are for draining the propane tank 
compartment under the quadrant panel.  I like that the cockpit doesn't need 
scuppers!

 

While I have you - what are your thoughts on the rod rigging on these boats?  
AFAIK, she has all her original standing rigging.   Yes she's been only in 
fresh water so far, but the age still gives me pause.   Have you rerigged yet?

 

Dave

1990 34+ Faith Anne

 

Sent from my T-Mobile Galaxy Note 2


 Original message 
From: Jean-Francois J Rivard jfriv...@us.ibm.com mailto:jfriv...@us.ibm.com 
 
Date: 06/15/2015 10:45 (GMT-05:00) 
To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com mailto:cnc-list@cnc-list.com  
Cc: davepula...@hotmail.com mailto:davepula...@hotmail.com  
Subject: Stus-List 34+ transom thru-hulls 


Hi David, 

Congrats on getting the 34+. I've owned mine for 3 years and still think I 
could not have possibly gotten a better boat for what we do.  The promise is 
that is gives you plentiful room and comfort at the marina / anchor and runs 
like a bat out of he$$ around the cans..   It does just that.   

All your questions are really straightforward. 

Exhaust hose:  I replaced mine last year, it's not that bad. Your idea of 
connecting the old one to the new one is excellent.  I just wrestled my old one 
out and taped a fiberglass wiring rod to the new one to pull some / guide it.  
The trick is to remove all the aft stateroom cushions then remove the fuel tank 
access panel and the wooden blocks that are screwed / wedged-in securing the 
fuel tank and find a way to jack-up tank to facilitate threading the new hose 
in under it ( I used 2 x 2's) .  

The challenge to thread the new hose is to line it up between the exposed strut 
bolts.  Stick to the original hose construction / diameter and you'll be fine.  
It's a bit of a sweaty wrestling match but you and 1 other guy should be able 
to knock it out in less than 1 hour. 

Through-Hulls  

None of what you mentioned is below the waterline at rest. They get dipped-in 
some when motoring or sailing in excess of 5 or so knots but that's nothing 
that the standard siphon loops can't handle. The 34+ is the last of the 
Canadian CC's and after 35 + odd years of designing racer cruisers they had it 
down.. Rob Ball knew what he was doing. 

FYI, all through hulls on mine are Marelon.  I close them all everytime I leave 
the boat and they works well, 

Also, there are no cockpit or deck scuppers on the boat.  All cockpit /deck 
water simply flows out the stern / swim platform area in a modern open stern / 
sport boat style.  On my boat there's a drain for the propane locker, also well 
designed.  No need to seal / mess with it as propane is heavier than air and 
flows down the drain like water with its exit above the waterline at rest  
There's no quadrant well.  On my boat The rudder shaft goes up to the quadrant 
that is mounted on top and flush with the cockpit sub-floor.  All that is 
easily accessible by simply removing the triangular fiberglass cover.  

Feel free to PM me for more details on how to tune the boat  / other questions 
of you want. 


-Francois Rivard
1990 34+ Take Five
Lake Lanier, GA

 





Subject: Re: Stus-List 34+ transom thru-hulls
Message-ID: snt152-w7315fc52d9f459dde543fda0...@phx.gbl 
mailto:snt152

Stus-List 34+ transom thru-hulls

2015-06-14 Thread David Pulaski via CnC-List
So I'm the proud new owner of a '90 34+, and the first project I bit off was 
replacement of the exhaust hose from the muffer back, including the thru-hull.

First off, this is not going to be fun because the hose runs under the fuel 
tank and span of the cockpit under the water heater where it is completely 
inaccessible.  I'm hoping I'll be able to pull the new hose through by clamping 
it to the old hose with a double-ended barb, but it seems like it's an awful 
tight fit under the tank.  If anyone else has done this job and has any 
suggestions, I'm all ears.

Second, the thru-hulls themselves.  There are 4 thru-hulls just under the 
transom - the exhaust, the two drains for the propane tank  steering quadrant 
well, and the bilge pump.  All 4 are plastic mushroom-head thru-hulls, and I 
want to replace at least the exhaust thru-hull with a new marelon one.  
Question:  none of these thru-hulls have seacocks on them, which seems odd (and 
unwise) to me because they appear to be below the waterline.  What are your 
thoughts on putting a marelon ball valve on the new thru hull while I'm at it?  
I'm tempted to replace all 4 of them with new thru-hull and valves.  Am I just 
being paranoid?

Thanks all.  I'm thrilled to have this boat and I'm sure I'll be pestering the 
heck out of this board!

-Dave
 1990 CC 34+ Faith Anne



  ___

Email address:
CnC-List@cnc-list.com
To change your list preferences, including unsubscribing -- go to the bottom of 
page at:
http://cnc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/cnc-list_cnc-list.com



Re: Stus-List 34+ transom thru-hulls

2015-06-14 Thread Patrick Davin via CnC-List
[Resending to list with your image removed since it exceeded msg size
limits]

Oh, yeah those look below waterline, I would want seacocks on them. I was
thinking your transom extended further back + up, but those are below the
bootstripe and close to the rudder.

You could also combine the two scuppers into one outlet and then plug or
remove a thruhull so you have one fewer. I assume those are deck scuppers
and not cockpit scuppers. That's how my deck scuppers are setup, and they
don't need rapid self bailing like the cockpit does.


On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 10:22 AM, David Pulaski davepula...@hotmail.com
wrote:

 I said appear to be below the waterline because the boat's not in the
 water, isn't going in the water anytime soon, and I've never actually seen
 one of these in the water :)  All four thru-hulls are under the transom
 counter and below the boot stripe as well as below the waterline as defined
 by the existing bottom paint, so I have to assume they are submerged with
 the boat floating level.  Given their location in the bowels of the stern
 lazarettes, I know accessing them is a pain but I'm paranoid enough that
 I'd close them when I'm leaving the boat on her mooring and not returning
 for a span of days at a time.  On second though, I'd have to leave the two
 small ones open because those are scuppers, so no sense in valves on them
 at all.

 Here's a pic of the two port side thru hulls, big one is the exhaust.  2
 more on the stbd side in the same configuration.




 -Dave
  1990 CC 34+ Faith Anne


___

Email address:
CnC-List@cnc-list.com
To change your list preferences, including unsubscribing -- go to the bottom of 
page at:
http://cnc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/cnc-list_cnc-list.com



Re: Stus-List 34+ transom thru-hulls

2015-06-14 Thread John Pennie via CnC-List
We had this issue on both our 34+ and 51.  Yes, the original design was without 
seacocks as they are just above the waterline and hide neatly under the transom 
skirt.  Heeled and under power is a different story and they will be under 
water.  it came up on a few surveys and rightfully so.  We never did add 
seacocks to either boat but it was always an area we kept an eye on.  Insurance 
carriers today may not be as forgiving.  

BTW - the 34+ is an incredible boat.  We raced ours on Wednesday nights, 
weekended on her and ultimately took her offshore to the caribbean.

Just my $.02

John

 On Jun 14, 2015, at 2:37 PM, Kevin Driscoll via CnC-List 
 cnc-list@cnc-list.com wrote:
 
 Assuming your boat sits on the lines it was designed for, those through hulls 
 should be just above the waterline and I'd typical for the Rob Ball designs 
 of late 80s early 90s. It will only be a couple of inches above WL but they 
 were very smartly designed to remain so (at anchor) and they keep the transom 
 uncluttered and clean. I consider it a one of the more refined design moves 
 that separates earlier cncs from the Ball era, my 2 cents.  Sounds like PO 
 could have raised boot and bottom paint, but hard to tell w/o a picture.
 
 The 34+ seems like a great boat and I hope to have one in the future...
 
 On Sun, Jun 14, 2015, 10:45 AM Patrick Davin via CnC-List 
 cnc-list@cnc-list.com mailto:cnc-list@cnc-list.com wrote:
 [Resending to list with your image removed since it exceeded msg size limits]
 
 Oh, yeah those look below waterline, I would want seacocks on them. I was 
 thinking your transom extended further back + up, but those are below the 
 bootstripe and close to the rudder. 
 
 You could also combine the two scuppers into one outlet and then plug or 
 remove a thruhull so you have one fewer. I assume those are deck scuppers and 
 not cockpit scuppers. That's how my deck scuppers are setup, and they don't 
 need rapid self bailing like the cockpit does. 
 
 
 On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 10:22 AM, David Pulaski davepula...@hotmail.com 
 mailto:davepula...@hotmail.com wrote:
 I said appear to be below the waterline because the boat's not in the 
 water, isn't going in the water anytime soon, and I've never actually seen 
 one of these in the water :)  All four thru-hulls are under the transom 
 counter and below the boot stripe as well as below the waterline as defined 
 by the existing bottom paint, so I have to assume they are submerged with the 
 boat floating level.  Given their location in the bowels of the stern 
 lazarettes, I know accessing them is a pain but I'm paranoid enough that I'd 
 close them when I'm leaving the boat on her mooring and not returning for a 
 span of days at a time.  On second though, I'd have to leave the two small 
 ones open because those are scuppers, so no sense in valves on them at all.
 
 Here's a pic of the two port side thru hulls, big one is the exhaust.  2 more 
 on the stbd side in the same configuration.
 
 
 -Dave
  1990 CC 34+ Faith Anne
 
 ___
 
 Email address:
 CnC-List@cnc-list.com mailto:CnC-List@cnc-list.com
 To change your list preferences, including unsubscribing -- go to the bottom 
 of page at:
 http://cnc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/cnc-list_cnc-list.com 
 http://cnc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/cnc-list_cnc-list.com
 
 ___
 
 Email address:
 CnC-List@cnc-list.com
 To change your list preferences, including unsubscribing -- go to the bottom 
 of page at:
 http://cnc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/cnc-list_cnc-list.com
 

___

Email address:
CnC-List@cnc-list.com
To change your list preferences, including unsubscribing -- go to the bottom of 
page at:
http://cnc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/cnc-list_cnc-list.com



Re: Stus-List 34+ transom thru-hulls

2015-06-14 Thread Kevin Driscoll via CnC-List
Assuming your boat sits on the lines it was designed for, those through
hulls should be just above the waterline and I'd typical for the Rob Ball
designs of late 80s early 90s. It will only be a couple of inches above WL
but they were very smartly designed to remain so (at anchor) and they keep
the transom uncluttered and clean. I consider it a one of the more refined
design moves that separates earlier cncs from the Ball era, my 2 cents.
Sounds like PO could have raised boot and bottom paint, but hard to tell
w/o a picture.

The 34+ seems like a great boat and I hope to have one in the future...

On Sun, Jun 14, 2015, 10:45 AM Patrick Davin via CnC-List 
cnc-list@cnc-list.com wrote:

 [Resending to list with your image removed since it exceeded msg size
 limits]

 Oh, yeah those look below waterline, I would want seacocks on them. I was
 thinking your transom extended further back + up, but those are below the
 bootstripe and close to the rudder.

 You could also combine the two scuppers into one outlet and then plug or
 remove a thruhull so you have one fewer. I assume those are deck scuppers
 and not cockpit scuppers. That's how my deck scuppers are setup, and they
 don't need rapid self bailing like the cockpit does.


 On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 10:22 AM, David Pulaski davepula...@hotmail.com
 wrote:

 I said appear to be below the waterline because the boat's not in the
 water, isn't going in the water anytime soon, and I've never actually seen
 one of these in the water :)  All four thru-hulls are under the transom
 counter and below the boot stripe as well as below the waterline as defined
 by the existing bottom paint, so I have to assume they are submerged with
 the boat floating level.  Given their location in the bowels of the stern
 lazarettes, I know accessing them is a pain but I'm paranoid enough that
 I'd close them when I'm leaving the boat on her mooring and not returning
 for a span of days at a time.  On second though, I'd have to leave the two
 small ones open because those are scuppers, so no sense in valves on them
 at all.

 Here's a pic of the two port side thru hulls, big one is the exhaust.  2
 more on the stbd side in the same configuration.



 -Dave
  1990 CC 34+ Faith Anne

 ___

 Email address:
 CnC-List@cnc-list.com
 To change your list preferences, including unsubscribing -- go to the
 bottom of page at:
 http://cnc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/cnc-list_cnc-list.com


___

Email address:
CnC-List@cnc-list.com
To change your list preferences, including unsubscribing -- go to the bottom of 
page at:
http://cnc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/cnc-list_cnc-list.com



Re: Stus-List 34+ transom thru-hulls

2015-06-14 Thread Patrick Davin via CnC-List
Regarding seacocks on transom thruhulls - what do you mean by they appear
to be below the waterline?  Either they are or they aren't, and it should
be pretty easy to determine this (are they submerged or not when the boat
is at the dock?). I'm not familiar with the 34+ but looking at some
pictures on Google Images it looks like the transom is similar to the LF38,
which would mean the exhaust thruhull and others are above waterline, but
can be submerged when you're pitching a lot in a wavy sea state.

The recommendation for seacocks is have them on every thruhull that is
below the heeled waterline. Whether you consider transom thruhulls that are
6-12 above waterline as being below the heeled waterline is probably
debateable. What I've heard is most people don't bother with them
(especially since access to them is usually a giant pain, so the seacock
would rarely be closed) - *unless* you plan to go offshore a bunch.
Although even offshore if a hose pulled off you could probably just stick a
wooden plug in (or potato or any of the other thruhull plugging devices).

So it's a matter of personal preference / your own paranoia level. I'm
pretty paranoid about below waterline thruhulls but for the transom ones
I've decided there are bigger risks to fry first.

-Patrick
CC LF38
Seattle, WA

On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 9:00 AM, cnc-list-requ...@cnc-list.com wrote:

 From: David Pulaski davepula...@hotmail.com
 To: CnC-List@cnc-list.com cnc-list@cnc-list.com
 Cc:
 Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2015 11:16:14 -0400
 Subject: Stus-List 34+ transom thru-hulls
 So I'm the proud new owner of a '90 34+, and the first project I bit off
 was replacement of the exhaust hose from the muffer back, including the
 thru-hull.

 First off, this is not going to be fun because the hose runs under the
 fuel tank and span of the cockpit under the water heater where it is
 completely inaccessible.  I'm hoping I'll be able to pull the new hose
 through by clamping it to the old hose with a double-ended barb, but it
 seems like it's an awful tight fit under the tank.  If anyone else has done
 this job and has any suggestions, I'm all ears.

 Second, the thru-hulls themselves.  There are 4 thru-hulls just under the
 transom - the exhaust, the two drains for the propane tank  steering
 quadrant well, and the bilge pump.  All 4 are plastic mushroom-head
 thru-hulls, and I want to replace at least the exhaust thru-hull with a new
 marelon one.  Question:  none of these thru-hulls have seacocks on them,
 which seems odd (and unwise) to me because they appear to be below the
 waterline.  What are your thoughts on putting a marelon ball valve on the
 new thru hull while I'm at it?  I'm tempted to replace all 4 of them with
 new thru-hull and valves.  Am I just being paranoid?

 Thanks all.  I'm thrilled to have this boat and I'm sure I'll be pestering
 the heck out of this board!

 -Dave
  1990 CC 34+ Faith Anne

___

Email address:
CnC-List@cnc-list.com
To change your list preferences, including unsubscribing -- go to the bottom of 
page at:
http://cnc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/cnc-list_cnc-list.com



Re: Stus-List 34+ transom thru-hulls

2015-06-14 Thread David Pulaski via CnC-List
I said appear to be below the waterline because the boat's not in the 
water, isn't going in the water anytime soon, and I've never actually 
seen one of these in the water :)  All four thru-hulls are under the 
transom counter and below the boot stripe as well as below the waterline
 as defined by the existing bottom paint, so I have to assume they are 
submerged with the boat floating level.  Given their location in the 
bowels of the stern lazarettes, I know accessing them is a pain but I'm 
paranoid enough that I'd close them when I'm leaving the boat on her 
mooring and not returning for a span of days at a time.  On second 
though, I'd have to leave the two small ones open because those are 
scuppers, so no sense in valves on them at all.

Here's a pic of the two port side thru hulls, big one is the exhaust.  2 more 
on the stbd side in the same configuration.

  

-Dave
 1990 CC 34+ Faith Anne

From: jda...@gmail.com
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2015 09:57:14 -0700
Subject: Re: 34+ transom thru-hulls
To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com; davepula...@hotmail.com

Regarding seacocks on transom thruhulls - what do you mean by they appear to 
be below the waterline?  Either they are or they aren't, and it should be 
pretty easy to determine this (are they submerged or not when the boat is at 
the dock?). I'm not familiar with the 34+ but looking at some pictures on 
Google Images it looks like the transom is similar to the LF38, which would 
mean the exhaust thruhull and others are above waterline, but can be submerged 
when you're pitching a lot in a wavy sea state. 
The recommendation for seacocks is have them on every thruhull that is below 
the heeled waterline. Whether you consider transom thruhulls that are 6-12 
above waterline as being below the heeled waterline is probably debateable. 
What I've heard is most people don't bother with them (especially since access 
to them is usually a giant pain, so the seacock would rarely be closed) - 
*unless* you plan to go offshore a bunch. Although even offshore if a hose 
pulled off you could probably just stick a wooden plug in (or potato or any of 
the other thruhull plugging devices). 
So it's a matter of personal preference / your own paranoia level. I'm pretty 
paranoid about below waterline thruhulls but for the transom ones I've decided 
there are bigger risks to fry first. 
-PatrickCC LF38Seattle, WA
  ___

Email address:
CnC-List@cnc-list.com
To change your list preferences, including unsubscribing -- go to the bottom of 
page at:
http://cnc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/cnc-list_cnc-list.com



Re: Stus-List 34+ transom thru-hulls

2015-06-14 Thread Chuck S via CnC-List
The thruhulls are above water at rest but must be under a few inches of water 
when sailing or when motoring at speed. I wouldn't be too concerned about the 
drains, but might add a shutoff valve to the engine exhaust? I don't have one, 
but I've seen it mentioned in most books for offshore safety. It protects the 
engine from getting seawater driven into the engine possible under very rare 
circumstances. 

The exhaust hose is meant to have a large loop high up inside the lazarette by 
design, so the engine has to build up exhaust pressure to lift the water up 
inside the muffler, and blow it out the hose. 


Chuck 
Resolute 
1990 CC 34R 
Broad Creek, Magothy River, Md 

- Original Message -

From: John Pennie via CnC-List cnc-list@cnc-list.com 
To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com 
Cc: John Pennie j...@svpaws.net 
Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2015 2:57:31 PM 
Subject: Re: Stus-List 34+ transom thru-hulls 

We had this issue on both our 34+ and 51. Yes, the original design was without 
seacocks as they are just above the waterline and hide neatly under the transom 
skirt. Heeled and under power is a different story and they will be under 
water. it came up on a few surveys and rightfully so. We never did add seacocks 
to either boat but it was always an area we kept an eye on. Insurance carriers 
today may not be as forgiving. 

BTW - the 34+ is an incredible boat. We raced ours on Wednesday nights, 
weekended on her and ultimately took her offshore to the caribbean. 

Just my $.02 

John 




On Jun 14, 2015, at 2:37 PM, Kevin Driscoll via CnC-List  
cnc-list@cnc-list.com  wrote: 



Assuming your boat sits on the lines it was designed for, those through hulls 
should be just above the waterline and I'd typical for the Rob Ball designs of 
late 80s early 90s. It will only be a couple of inches above WL but they were 
very smartly designed to remain so (at anchor) and they keep the transom 
uncluttered and clean. I consider it a one of the more refined design moves 
that separates earlier cncs from the Ball era, my 2 cents. Sounds like PO could 
have raised boot and bottom paint, but hard to tell w/o a picture. 

The 34+ seems like a great boat and I hope to have one in the future... 

On Sun, Jun 14, 2015, 10:45 AM Patrick Davin via CnC-List  
cnc-list@cnc-list.com  wrote: 

blockquote

[Resending to list with your image removed since it exceeded msg size limits] 

Oh, yeah those look below waterline, I would want seacocks on them. I was 
thinking your transom extended further back + up, but those are below the 
bootstripe and close to the rudder. 

You could also combine the two scuppers into one outlet and then plug or remove 
a thruhull so you have one fewer. I assume those are deck scuppers and not 
cockpit scuppers. That's how my deck scuppers are setup, and they don't need 
rapid self bailing like the cockpit does. 


On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 10:22 AM, David Pulaski  davepula...@hotmail.com  
wrote: 

blockquote

I said appear to be below the waterline because the boat's not in the water, 
isn't going in the water anytime soon, and I've never actually seen one of 
these in the water :) All four thru-hulls are under the transom counter and 
below the boot stripe as well as below the waterline as defined by the existing 
bottom paint, so I have to assume they are submerged with the boat floating 
level. Given their location in the bowels of the stern lazarettes, I know 
accessing them is a pain but I'm paranoid enough that I'd close them when I'm 
leaving the boat on her mooring and not returning for a span of days at a time. 
On second though, I'd have to leave the two small ones open because those are 
scuppers, so no sense in valves on them at all. 

Here's a pic of the two port side thru hulls, big one is the exhaust. 2 more on 
the stbd side in the same configuration. 





blockquote

-Dave 
1990 CC 34+ Faith Anne 


/blockquote

___ 

Email address: 
CnC-List@cnc-list.com 
To change your list preferences, including unsubscribing -- go to the bottom of 
page at: 
http://cnc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/cnc-list_cnc-list.com 


/blockquote

___ 

Email address: 
CnC-List@cnc-list.com 
To change your list preferences, including unsubscribing -- go to the bottom of 
page at: 
http://cnc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/cnc-list_cnc-list.com 


/blockquote



___ 

Email address: 
CnC-List@cnc-list.com 
To change your list preferences, including unsubscribing -- go to the bottom of 
page at: 
http://cnc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/cnc-list_cnc-list.com 


___

Email address:
CnC-List@cnc-list.com
To change your list preferences, including unsubscribing -- go to the bottom of 
page at:
http://cnc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/cnc-list_cnc-list.com