Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27589] - MultiThreadedConnectionManager should provide a shutdown

2004-03-29 Thread Michael Becke 
Message sent.

Mike

On Mar 29, 2004, at 4:26 PM, Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:

Mike,
I believe the only way to find this out is to approach the
infrastructure folks ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Oleg

On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 15:30, Michael Becke wrote:
Yes, unfortunately the nightly builds are from HEAD.  I'm not sure if
we can create both 2.0 and HEAD nightly builds.  Anyone know more 
about
this?

Mike

On Mar 29, 2004, at 4:27 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27589

MultiThreadedConnectionManager should provide a shutdown





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-03-29 
09:27
---
Thanks.

It seems that the nightly builds are done on the HEAD only, so I 
guess
I have
to retrieve the source from CVS and build myself.

Or is there any plan to have nightly builds for 2.0 support also?

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27589] - MultiThreadedConnectionManager should provide a shutdown

2004-03-29 Thread Oleg Kalnichevski 
Mike,
I believe the only way to find this out is to approach the
infrastructure folks ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Oleg

On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 15:30, Michael Becke wrote:
> Yes, unfortunately the nightly builds are from HEAD.  I'm not sure if 
> we can create both 2.0 and HEAD nightly builds.  Anyone know more about 
> this?
> 
> Mike
> 
> 
> On Mar 29, 2004, at 4:27 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> > DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
> > RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
> > .
> > ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
> > INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
> >
> > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27589
> >
> > MultiThreadedConnectionManager should provide a shutdown
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-03-29 09:27 
> > ---
> > Thanks.
> >
> > It seems that the nightly builds are done on the HEAD only, so I guess 
> > I have
> > to retrieve the source from CVS and build myself.
> >
> > Or is there any plan to have nightly builds for 2.0 support also?
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27589] - MultiThreadedConnectionManager should provide a shutdown

2004-03-29 Thread Michael Becke 
Yes, unfortunately the nightly builds are from HEAD.  I'm not sure if 
we can create both 2.0 and HEAD nightly builds.  Anyone know more about 
this?

Mike

On Mar 29, 2004, at 4:27 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27589

MultiThreadedConnectionManager should provide a shutdown





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-03-29 09:27 
---
Thanks.

It seems that the nightly builds are done on the HEAD only, so I guess 
I have
to retrieve the source from CVS and build myself.

Or is there any plan to have nightly builds for 2.0 support also?

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27589] - MultiThreadedConnectionManager should provide a shutdown

2004-03-17 Thread Michael Becke 
No worries.  I just wanted to make sure it didn't fall through the  
cracks.

Thanks,

Mike

On Mar 17, 2004, at 4:02 AM, Kalnichevski, Oleg wrote:

Sorry, Mike. Things are quite rough at work right now. I'll do my best  
to review the pending patches tonight and give you some feedback. +1  
to include this one into 2.0 code base

Oleg

-Original Message-
From: Michael Becke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 3:59
To: Commons HttpClient Project
Subject: Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27589] - MultiThreadedConnectionManager
should provide a shutdown
Any comments on this one?  I'd like to work this patch, and the one for
idle connection timeout, into 2.0.  How does everyone feel about that?
Mike

On Mar 15, 2004, at 6:27 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27589>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27589

MultiThreadedConnectionManager should provide a shutdown





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-03-15 11:27
---
Hi Mike,
Thanks for this patch, I just reviewed the code and it does meet our
requirements, it would be great if it could be part of 2.0 code base
especially as your implementation is safe because it should have no
side
effect for applications not using this new feature.
Gael

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:  
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:  
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

*** 

The information in this email is confidential and may be legally  
privileged.  Access to this email by anyone other than the intended  
addressee is unauthorized.  If you are not the intended recipient of  
this message, any review, disclosure, copying, distribution,  
retention, or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on  
it is prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you are not the intended  
recipient, please reply to or forward a copy of this message to the  
sender and delete the message, any attachments, and any copies thereof  
from your system.
*** 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:  
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:  
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27589] - MultiThreadedConnectionManager should provide a shutdown

2004-03-17 Thread Kalnichevski, Oleg 

Sorry, Mike. Things are quite rough at work right now. I'll do my best to review the 
pending patches tonight and give you some feedback. +1 to include this one into 2.0 
code base

Oleg

-Original Message-
From: Michael Becke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 3:59
To: Commons HttpClient Project
Subject: Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27589] - MultiThreadedConnectionManager
should provide a shutdown


Any comments on this one?  I'd like to work this patch, and the one for
idle connection timeout, into 2.0.  How does everyone feel about that?

Mike

On Mar 15, 2004, at 6:27 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
> RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
> <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27589>.
> ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
> INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
>
> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27589
>
> MultiThreadedConnectionManager should provide a shutdown
>
>
>
>
>
> --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-03-15 11:27
> ---
> Hi Mike,
>
> Thanks for this patch, I just reviewed the code and it does meet our
> requirements, it would be great if it could be part of 2.0 code base
> especially as your implementation is safe because it should have no
> side
> effect for applications not using this new feature.
>
> Gael
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


***
The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.  Access 
to this email by anyone other than the intended addressee is unauthorized.  If you are 
not the intended recipient of this message, any review, disclosure, copying, 
distribution, retention, or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it 
is prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you are not the intended recipient, please 
reply to or forward a copy of this message to the sender and delete the message, any 
attachments, and any copies thereof from your system.
***

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27589] - MultiThreadedConnectionManager should provide a shutdown

2004-03-16 Thread Michael Becke 
Any comments on this one?  I'd like to work this patch, and the one for 
idle connection timeout, into 2.0.  How does everyone feel about that?

Mike

On Mar 15, 2004, at 6:27 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27589

MultiThreadedConnectionManager should provide a shutdown





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-03-15 11:27 
---
Hi Mike,

Thanks for this patch, I just reviewed the code and it does meet our
requirements, it would be great if it could be part of 2.0 code base
especially as your implementation is safe because it should have no 
side
effect for applications not using this new feature.

Gael

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]