Re: Open source code coverage tool
That looks very nice. I look forward to trying it. At 03:53 AM 29/05/2004, you wrote: They just published (it seems is their) first public release last week... http://emma.sourceforge.net/ I'd be curious for anyone who uses Clover regularly (or whatever other code coverage tool might be out there) what they thought of this. None of my code comes close to having full junit coverage, so I don't have much ability to compare this to what's out there. -- Serge Knystautas President Lokitech >> software . strategy . design >> http://www.lokitech.com p. 301.656.5501 e. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Glen Stampoultzis [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.avalonseaview.com/
Re: Long and/or non-Apache posts on planetapache.org, is that ok?
Fine with me. At 08:54 PM 16/01/2004, you wrote: Thanks Thom and team for planetapache.org! Due to popular demand (one guy;-) my weblog is setup to send the whole text of posts over RSS, and I just posted a loong text which I'm afraid will take a lot of real estate on the http://www.planetapache.org/ page. Is this a problem for anyone, and if yes how to best handle this? I don't want to change my weblog config, should planet show only the first X chars of entries? Also, should we all setup our blogs so that only Apache-related stuff is aggregated? I'm happy with the current situation, I don't mind seeing other people's long posts and/or posts which are not directly related to Apache, but I'd hate to offend people with mine, so please speak up if this is the case ;-) Ciao, -Bertrand -- Bertrand Delacretaz independent consultant, Lausanne, Switzerland http://cvs.apache.org/~bdelacretaz/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Glen Stampoultzis [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.iinet.net.au/~gstamp/glen/
Re: Inappropriate use of announce@
At 12:41 PM 20/10/2003, you wrote: On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Tetsuya Kitahata wrote: > Nope. I have to resign. Well, thanks for your contribution Tetsuya. I think it is a worthwhile project, and I hope you reconsider or someone picks it up. I do believe that there have been some people getting a little too picky about "policies". In general in the Apache world, and especially in the case of the documentation, he who does the work should get to make the decisions. Suggesting that the newsletter be distributed in a particular format is perfectly acceptable. Insisting on it goes too far, unless there is a serious infrastructure concern. (Actually, I do agree that it would be better to simply send the link by email. But if Tetsuya thinks it is important to send the whole thing, I see no problem in letting him make that decision.) Joshua. Exactly. Well said.
Re: WORA Considered Evil ;-)
At 01:21 AM 27/06/2003, you wrote: BTW, Glen, HTTPd is written in C and it's *by far* more portable than any java program out there. I'll buy that. At the same time, the amount of work done to allow this portability is impressive, while, compiling for a JVM, gets you instant portability and almost no cost. This was basically what I was referring to in my original post. Ease of portability not that Java was more portable. Glen Stampoultzis [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.iinet.net.au/~gstamp/glen/
Re: WORA Considered Evil ;-)
At 04:03 PM 26/06/2003, you wrote: True, Java is not a systems programming language. But without WORA, I do not believe that Java would have the success that it has on the server. Yes. As dogmatic as Sun has been about "pure" Java it's still a success factor in the adoption of Java. There's still no other platform out there that makes it as easy as Java to write for multiple platforms. A little JNI in the right places certainly isn't evil though. Regards, Glen Stampoultzis [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.iinet.net.au/~gstamp/glen/
Re: Clover licenses
Well I already requested (and got) one for Poi so it's starting to sound like a done deal. Regards, Glen Stampoultzis At 07:47 AM 20/06/2003, you wrote: It looks like that's the way everyone does it and noone seems to have any objections. I've now put in a request for a license for HttpClient. If anyone has objections they should speak up very loudly now. :) Adrian Sutton. On Thursday, June 19, 2003, at 06:27 PM, Thomas Mahler wrote: Hi, For OJB we choose to use option 1. It took only a few hours to receive the license. We had no problems with this approach so far. cheers, Thomas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Glen Stampoultzis [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.iinet.net.au/~gstamp/glen/
Re: Common documents across the ASF
At 01:09 PM 19/06/2003, you wrote: Why NOT have shared documents? I've heard it said that the CVS organization is the barrier. OK, so why not look at what reasonable steps could relieve that barrier? What would happen if we had an Incubator module open to all ASF Committers? Would that lower the barrier and increase reuse? The reason why it hasn't been done is simple... because no one has actually stepped up to find all the redundant information and send patches to the various projects to fix it up. CVS access isn't the problem. Finding someone with the itch, time and motivation is. Glen Stampoultzis [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.iinet.net.au/~gstamp/glen/
Re: apache.org vs. mozilla.org
At 07:17 AM 6/04/2003, you wrote: I *hate* bugzilla a lot. +1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apache.org vs. mozilla.org
At 11:15 PM 5/04/2003, you wrote: Recently, I've started to dive into mozilla with a developer eye. *very slowly* since my c++ skills are almost non-existant (and my c skills are, h, rusted and ruined by the java garbage collector :-) Anyway, the cultural differences between their style of development and ours are striking. Have you talked to them about this. The comparison could be very interesting/useful to them. Regards, Glen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apache.org vs. mozilla.org
At 11:15 PM 5/04/2003, you wrote: Now, I'm asking: what if the ASF provides its own news server that wraps around all our current mail lists setup and make them available to all news-archiving services and news-reading clients? Of course, it should be transparent and allow to redirect back a newsgroup post to the mail list, which will then be handled by the ezmlm manager, like done today. So, you get the best of both worlds. I really think this is the only thing we can learn from the mozilla.org community so far. But it might be a good thing. What do you think? If you still have access to the mailing lists it would be okay. One important point to consider is that not everyone can get access to newsgroups through their corporate firewall. Regards, Glen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: idiot.html
there is one particular flame war that i remember. someone asked a tomcat question. i quite politely offered a possible solution but told them to ask on the tomcat list since that's where all the experts hang out. this descended quickly into a hideous flame war. Since moving general@ down to the bottom of the list we get much fewer postings from people asking about tomcat. Small changes can make a big difference. Regards, Glen
