[CGUYS] new web site about MD. computer service tax

2008-01-27 Thread Gayley Knight
The Maryland Technology Council has built a website to inform us 
about the

recently passed 6% sales tax on computer services, including website
development, website maintenance, and programming.

http://www.FightTheTechTax.com/index.cfm

/gayley
--
--
Gayley Knight
Mother Geek Productions MotherGeek.com
By, For  About Women Radio bfawomenRadio.com
Join the conversation at http://businessherway.blogspot.com/

American Women in Radio and Television-NCAC, Board
Business and Professional Women/MC, Board
National Assn. of Women Business Owners-Nation's Capital Chapter, Board



* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive from 1/1/2000 is on the MARC http://marc.info/?l=computerguys-l
* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] Suddenly a disk drive is not formatted in Windows XP

2008-01-27 Thread John DeCarlo
On Jan 26, 2008 7:16 PM, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Now trying to access the drive F, I get this message from Windows:  The
 disk drive in F is not formatted.  Do you want to format it now?

 I recommend going to grc.com and buying SpinRite - you can just download
it and run it.   You may well find that it recovers the drive for you
completely.

-- 
John DeCarlo, My Views Are My Own



* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive from 1/1/2000 is on the MARC http://marc.info/?l=computerguys-l
* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] Suddenly a disk drive is not formatted in Windows X

2008-01-27 Thread Tom Piwowar
However, in my experience, this has never been the case with external
drives, which a lot of his seem to be (I don't remember if this one
was). This was a BIOS limitation only evident on EIDE internal drives.

It depends on the disk controller that is in the case.

You make a good point that the first thing to try is to move the drive to 
an external case whose disk controller is known to be working.



* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive from 1/1/2000 is on the MARC http://marc.info/?l=computerguys-l
* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] Suddenly a disk drive is not formatted in Windows X

2008-01-27 Thread Tom Piwowar
I recommend going to grc.com and buying SpinRite - you can just download
it and run it.   You may well find that it recovers the drive for you
completely.

Without a general idea of what needs to be fixed it is not a good idea to 
run any repair utility. If it is a hardware problem, the data on the disk 
could be fine now and could get scrambled by the repair utility.



* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive from 1/1/2000 is on the MARC http://marc.info/?l=computerguys-l
* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] Suddenly a disk drive is not formatted in Windows XP

2008-01-27 Thread Robert
Followup on a suddenly unformatted drive.  I have decided that the 
internal hard drive F: that Windows reports as being unformatted is 
reported by BelArc advisor as this one:


Maxtor 6Y120M0 [Hard drive] (122.94 GB) -- drive 2, s/n Y3KTK99E, rev 
YAR51EW0, SMART http://www.belarc.com/smart.html Status: Healthy


Why is it reported as healthy?  Originally it was formatted as 
compressed drive.  It appears in Device Manager as working properly.


I have a backup of this drive from November 2007.  I am concerned about 
loosing stuff after that date, altho it probably isn't very much.  I was 
using this drive mostly as a backup of drive C:


Before reformatting, I want to know if there is a problem with Windows 
instead of the drive.




* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive from 1/1/2000 is on the MARC http://marc.info/?l=computerguys-l
* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



[CGUYS] Telephone companies and privacy

2008-01-27 Thread Steve Rigby
  In the news these days are stories about how our current  
administration is desperately trying to protect telephone companies  
from lawsuits that may be or are being filed as a result of their  
illegal participation in monitoring and wiretapping activities.


  I just paid my phone bill online with Verizon and was struck by  
this little bit of verbiage as I viewed the log out screen: As  
always, the privacy and security of your personal information is our  
#1 priority and is backed by our Internet Privacy Policy.


  It was the As always part that got to me the most.  Pure horse  
manure.


  Steve



* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive from 1/1/2000 is on the MARC http://marc.info/?l=computerguys-l
* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] Suddenly a disk drive is not formatted in Windows XP

2008-01-27 Thread mike
Right click my computer and select manage.
Select disk management.
See if the drive shows up.  If it does right click it and see if it gives
you any options like convert foreign disk or convert to dynamic...anything
but format unless you want to lose your data.  Sometimes when I connect
internal sata drives from other systems to retrieve files the disks need to
be converted from a 'foreign disk'

Mike

On Jan 26, 2008 5:16 PM, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 A week or more ago, I noticed that the desktop icon for internal drive F
 was missing.  I reinstalled the shortcut using My Computer (Windows XP
 SP 2).

 Now trying to access the drive F, I get this message from Windows:  The
 disk drive in F is not formatted.  Do you want to format it now?

 I have 5 hard drives: 2 internal (including F), three external.  Here's
 what Belarc Advisor says:

  DMI WD5000AAKB-0_UKA IEEE 1394 SBP2 Device [Hard drive] (500.11 GB) --
  drive 0
  Maxtor 6 L200P0 USB Device [Hard drive] (203.92 GB) -- drive 3
  Maxtor 6Y120M0 [Hard drive] (122.94 GB) -- drive 2, s/n Y3KTK99E, rev
  YAR51EW0, SMART http://www.belarc.com/smart.html Status: Healthy
  WD 4000YS External USB Device [Hard drive] (400.09 GB) -- drive 4
  WDC WD1200JD-75FYB0 [Hard drive] (120.00 GB) -- drive 1
 The amounts of GBs doesn't seem right to me in the above.  Here's what I
 think that I have:

 drive C  (boot drive, internal):  120 GB
 drive F:  can't remember, probably 160 GB (My Computer reports 0 bytes,
 internal)
 drive X:  500 GB
 drive Y:  400 GB
 drive Z:  thought it was 400 GB, but My Computer reports it as 200 GB.

 Is all my data on drive F destroyed?  I have a backup of drive F but it
 is from 2007 November.  I can't remember what data is on drive F.
 Should I reformat and restore the backup?  Or is it possible that drive
 F is being reported as unformatted when it really is not?  What to do?


 
 * == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
 * == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
 * Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
 * Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
 * Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
 * New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
 * Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 * List archive from 1/1/2000 is on the MARC
 http://marc.info/?l=computerguys-l
 * List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
 * RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
 * Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived
 




* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive from 1/1/2000 is on the MARC http://marc.info/?l=computerguys-l
* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] Telephone companies and privacy

2008-01-27 Thread Rev. Stewart Marshall

Whoa there hoss.

You are mistaking two different sets of privacy.

1.)  The privacy of your information as a customer and your financial 
information you share with them.  (As just evidenced as you made you 
payment on your phone bill using a financial instrument.)


2.)  You extrapolate this privacy to the privacy you enjoy or wish to 
enjoy on your use of the public airwaves and infrastructure of phone 
or wireless usage.


There comments are to 1) only not to any thing else.

I cannot speak to the administration and their need or want of 
looking into usage of phones.  That is another subject.


But you must understand I am in a profession that enjoys very little 
privacy.  I am on display all the time and everyone critiques what I 
do, so I really could care less if anyone is listening in to my phone 
calls.  Someone needs some sleep so whoever listens in to my calls 
gets tons of it.


Stewart


At 06:32 PM 1/27/2008, you wrote:

  In the news these days are stories about how our current
administration is desperately trying to protect telephone companies
from lawsuits that may be or are being filed as a result of their
illegal participation in monitoring and wiretapping activities.

  I just paid my phone bill online with Verizon and was struck by
this little bit of verbiage as I viewed the log out screen: As
always, the privacy and security of your personal information is our
#1 priority and is backed by our Internet Privacy Policy.

  It was the As always part that got to me the most.  Pure horse
manure.

  Steve


Rev. Stewart A. Marshall
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Prince of Peace
Ozark, AL  SL 82



* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive from 1/1/2000 is on the MARC http://marc.info/?l=computerguys-l
* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] Telephone companies and privacy

2008-01-27 Thread Eric S. Sande
It was the As always part that got to me the most.  Pure horse  
manure.


Verizon is committed to the privacy of communications.

In the absence of a court order we will not divulge subscriber
information or traffic details.

That is how our front line forces are trained to operate.



* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive from 1/1/2000 is on the MARC http://marc.info/?l=computerguys-l
* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] Telephone companies and privacy

2008-01-27 Thread Fred Holmes
Privacy has gone the way of the dodo. Technology rules. Get over it.

Fred Holmes

At 07:32 PM 1/27/2008, Steve Rigby wrote:
  In the news these days are stories about how our current  
administration is desperately trying to protect telephone companies  
from lawsuits that may be or are being filed as a result of their  
illegal participation in monitoring and wiretapping activities.

  I just paid my phone bill online with Verizon and was struck by  
this little bit of verbiage as I viewed the log out screen: As  
always, the privacy and security of your personal information is our  
#1 priority and is backed by our Internet Privacy Policy.

  It was the As always part that got to me the most.  Pure horse  
manure.

  Steve



* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive from 1/1/2000 is on the MARC http://marc.info/?l=computerguys-l
* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] Telephone companies and privacy

2008-01-27 Thread Steve Rigby

On Jan 27, 2008, at 8:20 PM, Rev. Stewart Marshall wrote:


Whoa there hoss.

You are mistaking two different sets of privacy.


  I do not think I am mistaking two different sets of privacy.   
Privacy guarantees as pertaining to my personal information is  
exactly what could have been violated by Verizon in their collusion  
with the NSA.  I'll probably never know if my own personal  
information that was in the hands of Verizon was handed over to the  
feds, but such information on others was.


  The verbiage I saw on the log out page did not specify that only  
personal information as related to my online financial transactions  
was guaranteed to be held in private.  That verbiage appeared to  
state the overall position that Verizon takes with its customers in  
general, and with myself specifically.


  As always, the privacy and security of your personal information  
is our #1 priority and is backed by our Internet Privacy Policy.


  At any rate, the basic privacy guarantees that Verizon has with  
all of their customers is and has been spelled out on their website  
and in other documentation for years.  That most certainly was  
violated, thus the scrambling to find a way to get the administration  
to push for a law to place Verizon beyond the laws that existed at  
the time that the violations took place.


  Steve


 




* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive from 1/1/2000 is on the MARC http://marc.info/?l=computerguys-l
* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] Security suite recommendations

2008-01-27 Thread John Duncan Yoyo
eeye's Blink does it all as well.  http://www.eeye.com  You can get
a free copy to review for a year.

On Jan 25, 2008 7:11 PM, db [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 If you google all the security suite reviews, you will see that Zone
 Alarm Internet Security Suite gets the best overall reviews.  I have
 used it for some time and am very pleased.
 http://www.zonealarm.com/store/content/catalog/products/sku_list.jsp

 db


 Richard P. wrote:
  I'm looking for security suite recommendations for average PC users.
  While I still believe in AVG, Zone Alarm and Spy Sweeper, recommending
  them doesn't go over too well with some people who feel that dealing
  with three separate programs and their individual prompts/updates is
  more than they want to keep track of.
 
  What all-in-one PC security suite (real world), recommendations would
  you suggest (firewall, anti-virus, and anti-spyware), which are user
  friendly and get the job done?
 
  Thanks in advance,
 
  Richard P.
 
 
  
  * == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
  * == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
  * Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
  * Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
  * Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
  * New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L
  YourNewAddress
  * Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  * List archive from 1/1/2000 is on the MARC
  http://marc.info/?l=computerguys-l
  * List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
  * RSS at
  www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
  * Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived
  
 


 
 * == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
 * == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
 * Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
 * Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
 * Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
 * New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
 * Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 * List archive from 1/1/2000 is on the MARC http://marc.info/?l=computerguys-l
 * List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
 * RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
 * Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived
 




-- 
John Duncan Yoyo
---o)



* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive from 1/1/2000 is on the MARC http://marc.info/?l=computerguys-l
* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] Telephone companies and privacy

2008-01-27 Thread chad evans wyatt
I was unaware that Verizon had resisted executive
orders (sidestepping the relevant court required under
FISA) to allow wiretaps on US citizens.



  

Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs



* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive from 1/1/2000 is on the MARC http://marc.info/?l=computerguys-l
* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] Telephone companies and privacy

2008-01-27 Thread Rev. Stewart Marshall

Whatever you want to believe.

It has always amazed me that people want privacy but leave it all 
hang out (so to speak) In this day of technology you leave so many 
digital footprints out there.  Kind of reminds me of the Head of 
google getting all bent out of shape when Cnet googled his info and 
let everyone know it.


As I said in my occupation I have very little privacy.  My pay is 
discussed by a board and voted on by all the congregation (By the way 
I do not know their financial information or salaries but they all 
know mine.)  I have no say in it except to walk out the door if I am 
unhappy.  My spending is watched over by everyone.  Every slip up is 
discussed in public!


In Europe it is never expected to have the kind of privacy folks 
think they have here in America.  I do not expect privacy.  If I am 
doing wrong I expect to be caught.  I do not expect anyone to cover 
my tracks. (Even if I am paying them, it is not their job to cover 
for my criminal activity.)


But I do believe you are wrong.  What Verizon was assuring you was in 
conjunction with what they are required to do with your private data 
resulting from a transaction.  It is what any respectable merchant 
will do when purchasing or divulging any financial data to them, 
assure you that they will keep this data private.


Collusion with NSA?  If the feds come up to me and say we need this, 
my first reaction, when and how soon!  They are the government and I 
am responsible to them.  (Remember Verizon operates under the 
privilege of the Federal government to use the airwaves and the phone lines.)


Maybe it is because I have such a low expectation of privacy, but it 
did not disturb me one bit that someone might listen into my 
conversations.   As I said before I have nothing to worry about in that regard.


Stewart


At 07:59 PM 1/27/2008, you wrote:
  I do not think I am mistaking two different sets of privacy.

Privacy guarantees as pertaining to my personal information is
exactly what could have been violated by Verizon in their collusion
with the NSA.  I'll probably never know if my own personal
information that was in the hands of Verizon was handed over to the
feds, but such information on others was.

  The verbiage I saw on the log out page did not specify that only
personal information as related to my online financial transactions
was guaranteed to be held in private.  That verbiage appeared to
state the overall position that Verizon takes with its customers in
general, and with myself specifically.

  As always, the privacy and security of your personal information
is our #1 priority and is backed by our Internet Privacy Policy.

  At any rate, the basic privacy guarantees that Verizon has with
all of their customers is and has been spelled out on their website
and in other documentation for years.  That most certainly was
violated, thus the scrambling to find a way to get the administration
to push for a law to place Verizon beyond the laws that existed at
the time that the violations took place.

  Steve


Rev. Stewart A. Marshall
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Prince of Peace
Ozark, AL  SL 82



* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive from 1/1/2000 is on the MARC http://marc.info/?l=computerguys-l
* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] Suddenly a disk drive is not formatted in Windows X

2008-01-27 Thread Tom Piwowar
 Without a general idea of what needs to be fixed it is not a good idea to
 run any repair utility. If it is a hardware problem, the data on the disk
 could be fine now and could get scrambled by the repair utility.


That happens not to be the case for SpinRite.  Could be for other utilities.

And what makes SpinRite so specially blessed? Can you elaborate?

I use a utility on Mac disks that rebuilds drive indexes in RAM, never 
writing anything to the disk until its work can be tested and approved. 
Does SpinRite work like that?



* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive from 1/1/2000 is on the MARC http://marc.info/?l=computerguys-l
* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] Telephone companies and privacy

2008-01-27 Thread Steve Rigby

On Jan 27, 2008, at 9:30 PM, Rev. Stewart Marshall wrote:

Collusion with NSA?  If the feds come up to me and say we need  
this, my first reaction, when and how soon!  They are the  
government and I am responsible to them.


  I think the opposite.  I, and you, are the most dominant and  
important portion of government.  A government of the people, by the  
people, and for the people.  Those who we chose to represent us in  
Washington are responsible for carrying out the laws that we, through  
our representatives, have enacted.  If the feds approach me and say  
we need this, my first reaction, why?  Especially when their request  
is illegal.



Maybe it is because I have such a low expectation of privacy, but  
it did not disturb me one bit that someone might listen into my  
conversations.   As I said before I have nothing to worry about in  
that regard.


  Really?  Even to your most intimate and perhaps revealing of  
conversations?


  Steve



* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive from 1/1/2000 is on the MARC http://marc.info/?l=computerguys-l
* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] Telephone companies and privacy

2008-01-27 Thread Steve Rigby

On Jan 27, 2008, at 9:40 PM, Tom Piwowar wrote:

I grew up being taught that ex post facto laws were prohibited by  
the

Constitution (Article I, section 9). Or is this just another of those
inconvenient truths?


  Some would say that you grew up in a different generation, that  
things are different now, and to just get over it.


  Steve



* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive from 1/1/2000 is on the MARC http://marc.info/?l=computerguys-l
* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] Telephone companies and privacy

2008-01-27 Thread Tom Piwowar
In the news these days are stories about how our current  
administration is desperately trying to protect telephone companies  
from lawsuits that may be or are being filed as a result of their  
illegal participation in monitoring and wiretapping activities.

I grew up being taught that ex post facto laws were prohibited by the 
Constitution (Article I, section 9). Or is this just another of those 
inconvenient truths?

Generally speaking, ex post facto laws are seen as a violation of the 
rule of law as it applies in a free and democratic society. Most common 
law jurisdictions do not permit retrospective legislation... in a nation 
with an entrenched bill of rights or a written constitution, ex post 
facto legislation may be prohibited. 
(en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ex_post_facto_law)

But I suppose Bush could just issue them all pardons.



* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive from 1/1/2000 is on the MARC http://marc.info/?l=computerguys-l
* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] Telephone companies and privacy

2008-01-27 Thread Steve Rigby

On Jan 27, 2008, at 8:07 PM, Fred Holmes wrote:


Privacy has gone the way of the dodo. Technology rules. Get over it.


  Yeah, well, I'm pickin' my nose right now, but you still can't see  
me do it, can you?


  Steve



* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive from 1/1/2000 is on the MARC http://marc.info/?l=computerguys-l
* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] Telephone companies and privacy

2008-01-27 Thread Rev. Stewart Marshall

I have been married for 27 years.  No longer a reason to worry.  :-)

Stewart


At 09:21 PM 1/27/2008, you wrote:

  Really?  Even to your most intimate and perhaps revealing of
conversations?

  Steve


Rev. Stewart A. Marshall
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Prince of Peace
Ozark, AL  SL 82



* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive from 1/1/2000 is on the MARC http://marc.info/?l=computerguys-l
* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] Now...what is this?...

2008-01-27 Thread Marcio V. Pinheiro

Many thanks Richard. It worked!

Marcio



At 11:38 26/1/2008, Richard P. wrote:

Did you try defragging in the safe mode?

Richard P.



Computers are forever surprising me...

Now I am trying to defragment my C: drive and guess what shows in 
the lower bar?


PROGRAM (C:) Paused for Volume Shadow Copy

And...it seems that it will stay there...

Any help?

Thanks

Marcio




* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive from 1/1/2000 is on the MARC http://marc.info/?l=computerguys-l
* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] Telephone companies and privacy

2008-01-27 Thread Steve Rigby

On Jan 27, 2008, at 8:42 PM, Eric S. Sande wrote:



Verizon is committed to the privacy of communications.

In the absence of a court order we will not divulge subscriber
information or traffic details.

That is how our front line forces are trained to operate.


  But, it was not the front line forces who violated those  
principles, was it?


  Steve



* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive from 1/1/2000 is on the MARC http://marc.info/?l=computerguys-l
* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] Telephone companies and privacy

2008-01-27 Thread Eric S. Sande
I do not think I am mistaking two different sets of privacy.   
Privacy guarantees as pertaining to my personal information is  
exactly what could have been violated by Verizon in their collusion  
with the NSA.


Could have?  That's a weak argument as far as evidence that
Verizon colluded with the NSA.  The NSA doesn't need Verizon
to get in your shorts.

Demonizing a perfectly good telco is probably a bad strategy.

At Verizon, I've had the opportunity to work with a very diverse
community of very professional people.  We take the whole privacy
issue very seriously.

So seriously that there are requred courses on this.  For all management
people.

I don't think I'm excessively stupid, some may disagree. 




* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive from 1/1/2000 is on the MARC http://marc.info/?l=computerguys-l
* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] Telephone companies and privacy

2008-01-27 Thread Steve Rigby

On Jan 27, 2008, at 10:17 PM, Eric S. Sande wrote:

I do not think I am mistaking two different sets of privacy.
Privacy guarantees as pertaining to my personal information is   
exactly what could have been violated by Verizon in their  
collusion  with the NSA.


Could have?  That's a weak argument as far as evidence that
Verizon colluded with the NSA.  The NSA doesn't need Verizon
to get in your shorts.


  Well, sir, all I can say is that you need to investigate the  
goings on within the very company that you apparently work for.


  Steve



* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive from 1/1/2000 is on the MARC http://marc.info/?l=computerguys-l
* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived