Re: [Cooker] still no go on hd.img (another recent rsync)
lol, i've got roughly 20 gb of data on it. ..unless i can borrow an extra 20gb drive from somebody??? lol no i did not have to use that s/w. matter of fact all newer hdd's do not require that (or cannot even use it). most of the hdd's or already preformat anyways. when partitioning, i just use partition magic. never had this problem before. i'm guessing (sigh, again) that it's probabely just because it's with the hd.imgprobabely something missing between it and the cdrom install iso. (missing driver.not able to find the proper module settings etc...). *remember! this is a newer model hdd! all of my older hdd's are able to use the hd.img diskette. go figure. On Fri, 18 Feb 2000, you wrote: Hi Roger I need to ask you how you partitioned your hard drive. Because if you partitioned your hard drive through the western digital software, it is unlikely your unix based operating system (Linux) will be able to see. My advice is to see whether you can reformat it with DOS. Let me know if this helps. If this was not the case, then I am sorry I will not be able to help you. Terry From: Roger [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Cooker] still no go on hd.img (another recent rsync) Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2000 05:07:20 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: from [216.71.84.35] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id MHotMailBA7690D200B5D82197A9D8475423286E0; Fri Feb 18 05:14:59 2000 Received: (from sympa@localhost)by mandrakesoft.mandrakesoft.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id HAA15796for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 07:02:29 -0600 Received: from mail.rdc1.sdca.home.com (ha1.rdc1.sdca.home.com [24.0.3.66]) by mandrakesoft.mandrakesoft.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id GAA14724 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 06:58:18 -0600 Received: from cx640487-b ([24.13.20.26]) by mail.rdc1.sdca.home.com (InterMail v4.01.01.00 201-229-111) with SMTP id 2218131045.PCMT25101.mail.rdc1.sdca.home.com@cx640487-b for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 05:10:45 -0800 From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 18 05:19:12 2000 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.28] Message-Id: 00021805120500.12439@cx640487-b X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Sequence: 1255 Precedence: list i tried...and failed again... Can i use the "scsi" option (button), choose ide probe (or other ide option) to enter some specifics on my ide hdd (it's not scsi but did see some options on "ide" specific drives after pressing the scsi button on hd.img)? it's one of the new western digitals. maybe it's not finding it?? but the install from iso or net.img works fine. any other options to getting this hd.img to find my partitions? __ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com -- Sent from: Lattitude (deg):32.7130 Longitude (deg):-117.1530 Altitude (ft): 410.0 GMT to Local (hrs): -8.0 (daylight savings enabled) Created with Linux-Mandrake 7.0! http://www.linux-mandrake.com/ Currently Beta Testing Mandrake Ver 7.0
[Cooker] unsubscribe
unsubscribe
Re: [Cooker] unsubscribe
unsubcribe -Original Message-From: Richard McCranie [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: Monday, February 21, 2000 5:16 AMSubject: [Cooker] unsubscribe unsubscribe
RE: [Cooker] Nobody can figure out why sndconfig hangs up on me
Just as a note, in Red Hat/Mandrake systems, /etc/modules.conf is actually /etc/conf.modules. Also, the ESS 1868 is not neccessarily an Ensonique card. The ESS 1868 is made by the people at http://www.esstech.com/. ESS Technology != Ensonique. Good luck! Don Head Linux Mentor Wave Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED] [AIM - Don Wave][ICQ - 18804935] [IRC - EFnet, #WaveTech, Don-Wave] -Original Message- From: CE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2000 7:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Cooker] Nobody can figure out why sndconfig hangs up on me James Helferty wrote: Hi everyone. The lpr rpm in Mandrake 7.0 is buggy; no one but root may print!! (Note that this same rpm is in the current Mandrake Cooker release, so I'm not totally off-topic here. ;) In case anyone's interested in the error message (and hasn't read the newsgroup alt.os.linux.mandrake recently) it's: lpr: cannot open printer description file ..when you type "lpr" on the commandline. I have high security-level turned on, but I don't think this should be a problem. (And if it is, why isn't it documented..?!?) I'm running Mandrake 7.0, the only distribution which will let me on the internet, but it joins all the other RH and Manrake distros after 5.2 in not configuring my ESS 1868 sound card. As far as I get is when It tells me what it is. If I'm in an xterm window, it just shuts off after I hit OK. If I'm at the consol, it gives me a blue screen and hangs there forever. As referenced above, RH 5.2 did configure this same sound card with no problems on the same machine. Here's the details: CTX Pentium MMX 233/64 DSL connection which works Audio Card is Ensoniqe ESS 1868 I tried suggestions from Linuxcare which didn't do anythng. Here's some of the stuff I was told that didn't do anything You can also try using the following command to install the sound module. #/sbin/modprobe sb I am not sure that the normal soundblaster setting will work, or at least they didn't with my ESS 18XX chipset. If that doesn't work try this. add the following line to /etc/modules.conf : options sb io=0x220 irq=5 dma=0 mpu_io=0x330 then do a: /sbin/modprobe -r sb I didn't find anything that was exactly /etc/modules.conf I look in the /etc from the xterm and even from pico, it isn't there. Why is this not working? Would it make a difference if I installed an "authentic" Soundblaster 16 sounc card? What can I do? Thanks CE
[Cooker] New version of nessus
Nessus 0.99.5: http://www.nessus.org/posix.html
[Cooker] fetchmail with ssl
Hi Chmouel,
The fetchmail-5.2.6-1mdk.src.rpm didn't support ssl, I modified spec
file.
--- fetchmail.spec.orig Sun Feb 6 18:39:39 2000
+++ fetchmail.spec Tue Feb 22 01:30:37 2000
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
Summary: A remote mail retrieval and forwarding utility.
Name: fetchmail
Version: 5.2.6
-Release: 1mdk
+Release: 2mdk
Requires: smtpdaemon
Source: ftp://locke.ccil.org/pub/esr/fetchmail/fetchmail-%{version}.tar.bz2
Copyright: freely redistributable
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
%setup -q
%build
-CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" ./configure --prefix=/usr
+CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS -I/usr/include/openssl" ./configure --prefix=/usr --with-ssl
make
%install
Andrew Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MandrakeCLE ftp://mdk.linux.org.tw/pub/Mandrake-CLE/
[Cooker] Contrib: xjokes specfile diff
Hi, Here's a diff to fix the xjokes .spec file... Stefan --- ../RPM/SPECS/xjokes-1.0-2.spec Sun Mar 15 21:24:42 1998 +++ xjokes-1.0-2.spec Mon Feb 21 19:00:13 2000 @@ -1,13 +1,13 @@ Summary: X ¾å¤Î¥¸¥ç¡¼¥¯¥½¥Õ¥È Name: xjokes Version: 1.0 -Release: 3 +Release: 4 Group: X11/Amusements Source: ftp://ftp.lab.kdd.co.jp/Usenet/fj.sources/1992/jul/xjokes.tar.z Source1: ftp://ftp.lab.kdd.co.jp/Usenet/fj.sources/1992/jul/xjokes2.tar.z Source2: ftp://ftp.lab.kdd.co.jp/Usenet/fj.sources/1992/jul/xjokes3.tar.z Source3: ftp://ftp.lab.kdd.co.jp/Usenet/fj.sources/1992/jul/xjokes4.tar.z -Copyright: +Copyright: ? #Packager: FURUSAWA,Kazuhisa [EMAIL PROTECTED] #Distribution: Japanese RPM (JRPM) #Vendor: Linux Japanese RPM Project @@ -57,3 +57,7 @@ %doc README README-* /usr/X11R6/bin/* %doc README + +%changelog +* Mon Feb 21 2000 Stefan van der Eijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] +- CopyRight tag was empty: added a question mark.
Re: [Cooker] Contrib: xjokes specfile diff
Here's a diff to fix the xjokes .spec file... i don't think lenny has a account to chello.nl, Reccing. Very true... Maybe we should organize that for him... ;-) I noticed the mistake and resent it to him. Stefan PS: any idea if he's been in today? I've loaded his mailbox a bit with contrib fixes...
[Cooker] Contrib: translit SRPM
Hi, I re-did the translit .spec file compressed the sources. the src.rpm is in /incoming... Stefan
Re: [Cooker] Re: kernel RPMS are not providing kernel
On Mon, 21 Feb 2000, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
from the quill of Pablo Saratxaga [EMAIL PROTECTED] on scroll
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The problem is that the versions don't work with provides given by
Provides: line (that is they only work for package names).
H. That seems like a shortsight.
You know however the it is a correct version; so you can use --nodeps;
you have no choice indeed.
This is ugly.
The *.spec file of kernel building is wrong; all "Provide:
kernel=%{version}"
must be changed to "Provide: kernel", no versioning can be used on
the Provide: line
OK. Is this going to be fixed in the Mandrake kernel RPM then?
To chmou: I think the right way to handle that will be to have those
packages
just provide "kernel" (as they should) then patch rpm so for any
"provides"
it takes the version number of the package, when checking version
numbers.
That sounds like a good idea.
Because they don't provide kernel = 2.2.5, they provide a strange
thing
called "kernel=2.2.14"
OK, I think I get this. The =, =, etc. operators are not really
operators on a Provides: line. They are just more characters in the
opaque string "kernel=2.2.14" feature that the package provides. That
sucks. :-)
As you have no package that provides "kernel" then any package
requiring
it will fail.
Even worse, I have no package that provides the opaque feature "kernel
= 2.2.5" so packages that are written to Require: kernel = 2.2.5 will
not work. This seems very unworkable. I don't think we should be
putting single version specific strings like "= 2.2.5" in Requires:
attributes.
Comments?
b.
it's a spec bug, it reads
Provides: kernel=%{version} module-info kernel-fb
it should read.
Provides: kernel = %{version} , module-info, kernel-fb
Shouldn't it?
--
MandrakeSoft http://www.mandrakesoft.com/
--Axalon
[Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] libgtop-1.1.5-0.1mdk
from the quill of Axalon Bloodstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] on scroll [EMAIL PROTECTED] --=-=-= Name: libgtop Distribution: Mandrake Version : 1.1.5 Vendor: MandrakeSoft Release : 0.1mdkBuild Date: Sun Feb 20 09:27:52 2000 When trying to upgrade my Cooker system to this package I get the following dependancy errors: error: failed dependencies: libgtop_sysdeps-1.1.so.5 is needed by libgtop-1.1.5-0.1mdk libgtop-1.1.so.3 is needed by gnome-utils-1.0.50-1mdk libgtop-1.1.so.3 is needed by gtop-1.0.6-1mdk libgtop-1.1.so.3 is needed by gnome-core-1.0.55-2mdk libgtop_common-1.1.so.3 is needed by gnome-utils-1.0.50-1mdk libgtop_common-1.1.so.3 is needed by gtop-1.0.6-1mdk libgtop_common-1.1.so.3 is needed by gnome-core-1.0.55-2mdk libgtop_names-1.1.so.3 is needed by gnome-utils-1.0.50-1mdk libgtop_sysdeps-1.1.so.3 is needed by gnome-utils-1.0.50-1mdk libgtop_sysdeps-1.1.so.3 is needed by gtop-1.0.6-1mdk libgtop_sysdeps-1.1.so.3 is needed by gnome-core-1.0.55-2mdk Is it the intention that I should use --nodeps with this package or is this a problem with packaging that should be resolved? There will be trouble on my box if I do this upgrade. Right now I have the following libraries installed: /usr/lib/libgtop-1.1.so.3@ /usr/lib/libgtop-1.1.so.3.0.0* /usr/lib/libgtop_common-1.1.so.3@ /usr/lib/libgtop_common-1.1.so.3.0.0* /usr/lib/libgtop_names-1.1.so.3@ /usr/lib/libgtop_names-1.1.so.3.0.0* /usr/lib/libgtop_suid_common-1.1.so.3@ /usr/lib/libgtop_suid_common-1.1.so.3.0.0* /usr/lib/libgtop_sysdeps-1.1.so.3@ /usr/lib/libgtop_sysdeps-1.1.so.3.0.0* and the new package will give me: /usr/lib/libgtop-1.1.so.5 /usr/lib/libgtop-1.1.so.5.0.0 /usr/lib/libgtop_common-1.1.so.5 /usr/lib/libgtop_common-1.1.so.5.0.0 /usr/lib/libgtop_names-1.1.so.5 /usr/lib/libgtop_names-1.1.so.5.0.0 /usr/lib/libgtop_suid_common-1.1.so.5 /usr/lib/libgtop_suid_common-1.1.so.5.0.0 I think anything that is using the libgtop shared libraries is going to break. If we take "gtop" as an example, it has the following libgtop requirements: libgtop-1.1.so.3 = /usr/lib/libgtop-1.1.so.3 (0x403eb000) libgtop_sysdeps-1.1.so.3 = /usr/lib/libgtop_sysdeps-1.1.so.3 (0x403f2000) libgtop_common-1.1.so.3 = /usr/lib/libgtop_common-1.1.so.3 (0x403fc000) Note that gtop is compiled to want libgtop-1.1.so.3 not libgtop-1.1.so so when I _replace_ my libgtop*-1.1.so.3 libraries with libgtop*-1.1.so.5 libraries gtop will break no? I am thinking that one cannot really upgrade libgtop without also upgrading gnome-utils, gtop and gnome-core. Thots? b. -- Brian J. Murrell InterLinx Support Services, Inc. North Vancouver, B.C. 604 983 UNIX Platform and Brand Independent UNIX Support - R3.2 - R4 - BSD
Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] libgtop-1.1.5-0.1mdk
On Mon, 21 Feb 2000, Brian J. Murrell wrote: from the quill of Axalon Bloodstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] on scroll [EMAIL PROTECTED] --=-=-= Name: libgtop Distribution: Mandrake Version : 1.1.5 Vendor: MandrakeSoft Release : 0.1mdkBuild Date: Sun Feb 20 09:27:52 2000 [..] I am thinking that one cannot really upgrade libgtop without also upgrading gnome-utils, gtop and gnome-core. Thots? b. Yep. it's time for the month long rebuilding of gnome, goes from David to pablo to me and back and forth between me and pablo for the rest, takes awhile to get it all rebuilt. In the mean time either don't use -U (use -i), or don't pay attention to gnome stuff for a couple weeks :) -- MandrakeSoft http://www.mandrakesoft.com/ --Axalon
RE: [Cooker] Nobody can figure out why sndconfig hangs up on me
On Mon, 21 Feb 2000, Don Head wrote: Just as a note, in Red Hat/Mandrake systems, /etc/modules.conf is actually /etc/conf.modules. This will change, in the mean time just set a link between the two Also, the ESS 1868 is not neccessarily an Ensonique card. The ESS 1868 is made by the people at http://www.esstech.com/. ESS Technology != Ensonique. Good luck! Don Head Linux Mentor Wave Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED] [AIM - Don Wave][ICQ - 18804935] [IRC - EFnet, #WaveTech, Don-Wave]
Re: [Cooker] File not found:/var/tmp/a2ps-root/usr/share/locale/*/LC_MESSAGES/
Stefan van der Eijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: How do I get my intel sys to install catalogs? do you have the RPM_LINGUAS variable (or something like this (pablo ?)) -- MandrakeSoft http://www.mandrakesoft.com/ --Chmouel
Re: [Cooker] glibc pre4
"geoffrey lee" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: hi, this si the new glibc spec and glibc pre4 patch that i made against glibc-2.1.3 0.1mdk. sorry, but i dunno who is the maintainer for glibc... it's me i do the upgrade. -- MandrakeSoft http://www.mandrakesoft.com/ --Chmouel
Re: [Cooker] File notfound:/var/tmp/a2ps-root/usr/share/locale/*/LC_MESSAGES/
How do I get my intel sys to install catalogs? do you have the RPM_LINGUAS variable (or something like this (pablo ?)) not in the list that "set" gives me...
Re: [Cooker] glibc pre4
"geoffrey lee" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: hi, this si the new glibc spec and glibc pre4 patch that i made against glibc-2.1.3 0.1mdk. sorry, but i dunno who is the maintainer for glibc... humm sound like the version cvs was already a pre4. -- MandrakeSoft http://www.mandrakesoft.com/ --Chmouel
Re: [Cooker] still no go on hd.img (another recent rsync)
On Mon, 21 Feb 2000, Roger wrote: lol, i've got roughly 20 gb of data on it. ..unless i can borrow an extra 20gb drive from somebody??? lol no i did not have to use that s/w. matter of fact all newer hdd's do not require that (or cannot even use it). most of the hdd's or already preformat It isn't the drive but the bios that has the problems, that would require translation software. And _all_ maxtors come unformated and unpartitioned, btw. anyways. when partitioning, i just use partition magic. never had this Thats the answer to your problem partition magic is hideing the partition most likely :) problem before. i'm guessing (sigh, again) that it's probabely just because it's with the hd.imgprobabely something missing between it and the cdrom install iso. (missing driver.not able to find the proper module settings etc...). *remember! this is a newer model hdd! all of my older hdd's are able to use the hd.img diskette. go figure. try finding the "cylinder limit" jumper and enableing it also
[Cooker] Re[2]: kernel RPMS are not providing kernel
from the quill of Axalon Bloodstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] on scroll
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 21 Feb 2000, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
it's a spec bug, it reads
Provides: kernel=%{version} module-info kernel-fb
it should read.
Provides: kernel = %{version} , module-info, kernel-fb
Shouldn't it?
I dunno the impression I got from Pablo Saratxaga was that versions are
not recognized at all in Provides: lines and the whole string, "=" and
all is taken as an opaque value which will match any requires of the
exact same string. Maybe I got the message wrong.
b.
--
Brian J. Murrell InterLinx Support Services, Inc.
North Vancouver, B.C. 604 983 UNIX
Platform and Brand Independent UNIX Support - R3.2 - R4 - BSD
[Cooker] ntpd instead of xntpd
Hi! Currently the Air ships with xntpd (ntpd version 3). The newest version of ntpd is called ntpd and is version 4. Why not ship ntpd instead of xntpd? -- Sincerely Jørgen Hermanrud Fjeld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Cooker] Re[2]: kernel RPMS are not providing kernel
On Mon, 21 Feb 2000, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
from the quill of Axalon Bloodstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] on scroll
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 21 Feb 2000, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
it's a spec bug, it reads
Provides: kernel=%{version} module-info kernel-fb
it should read.
Provides: kernel = %{version} , module-info, kernel-fb
Shouldn't it?
I dunno the impression I got from Pablo Saratxaga was that versions are
not recognized at all in Provides: lines and the whole string, "=" and
all is taken as an opaque value which will match any requires of the
exact same string. Maybe I got the message wrong.
b.
Give me another two hours and i will have a full explination.
But it does accept 'Provides: kernel = %{version},' I'm checking
'Provides: kernel,' now. It should read the package version but I'd like
to be sure
--
MandrakeSoft http://www.mandrakesoft.com/
--Axalon
Re: [Cooker] Re: libgtop-1.1.5-0.1mdk
from the quill of Axalon Bloodstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] on scroll [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yep. it's time for the month long rebuilding of gnome, goes from David to pablo to me and back and forth between me and pablo for the rest, takes awhile to get it all rebuilt. OK. Should any RPMs get cut until it is all ready to go then? I mean if somebody were to burn a CD from Cooker today they would have troubles. In the mean time either don't use -U (use -i), or don't pay attention to gnome stuff for a couple weeks :) Well the only choice really is the latter, no? The issue of using -i and not using -U is only one of getting the package to actually install. Once you do install it (using -i --nodeps), you will break everything that wants libgtop won't you? Or will the two versions of the libraries live together on the box, while all of the common files (like share, doc, etc.) will get overwritten by the new version? What happens if you force 1.1.5 on and then remove 1.1.3? Does any file that is the same name in both packages get removed with the 1.1.3 removal or is RPM smart enough to know that a given file, that was in 1.1.3 and then overwritten by 1.1.5 should not be removed when 1.1.3 is removed (with rpm -e)? b. -- Brian J. Murrell InterLinx Support Services, Inc. North Vancouver, B.C. 604 983 UNIX Platform and Brand Independent UNIX Support - R3.2 - R4 - BSD
Re: [Cooker] Re[2]: kernel RPMS are not providing kernel
Axalon Bloodstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Give me another two hours and i will have a full explination.
But it does accept 'Provides: kernel = %{version},' I'm checking
'Provides: kernel,' now. It should read the package version but I'd like
to be sure
let me know i currently work on the kernel rpm.
--
MandrakeSoft http://www.mandrakesoft.com/
--Chmouel
[Cooker]
10q __ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Re: [Cooker] Re: libgtop-1.1.5-0.1mdk
On Mon, 21 Feb 2000, Brian J. Murrell wrote: from the quill of Axalon Bloodstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] on scroll [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yep. it's time for the month long rebuilding of gnome, goes from David to pablo to me and back and forth between me and pablo for the rest, takes awhile to get it all rebuilt. OK. Should any RPMs get cut until it is all ready to go then? I mean if somebody were to burn a CD from Cooker today they would have troubles. well yeah libgtop won't install.. In the mean time either don't use -U (use -i), or don't pay attention to gnome stuff for a couple weeks :) Well the only choice really is the latter, no? The issue of using -i and not using -U is only one of getting the package to actually install. Once you do install it (using -i --nodeps), you will break everything that wants libgtop won't you? Or will the two versions of the libraries live together on the box, while all of the common files (like share, doc, etc.) will get overwritten by the new version? No. First off I never said to use nodeps. You want to install it along side of the older version, breaking as little as posible in the mean time. If you use nodeps you do not get told about the missing file (tracking it down now) in libgtop-1.1.5-0.1mdk (libgtop_sysdeps-1.1.so.5), it would be pretty much useless What happens if you force 1.1.5 on and then remove 1.1.3? Does any file that is the same name in both packages get removed with the 1.1.3 removal or is RPM smart enough to know that a given file, that was in 1.1.3 and then overwritten by 1.1.5 should not be removed when 1.1.3 is removed (with rpm -e)? b. You shouldn't have to force it, you would issue rpm --test -ivv --replace-files libgtop-1.1.5-0.2mdk.i586.rpm # install 1.1.5 overwriteing any common files rpm --test -Uvv libgtop-devel-1.1.5-0.2mdk.i586.rpm # replace the old devel with the new Once all the files linked to older libs are updated, you issue rpm --test -evv libgtop-1.1.3-Xmdk # Remove the obsolete libs Rpm will skip over the "common/newer" files when you erase the older rpm. Bon? -- MandrakeSoft http://www.mandrakesoft.com/ --Axalon
Re: [Cooker] ouch! my eardrums
On Sun, 20 Feb 2000, Roger wrote:
Well, booting up my linux today and as it was scrolling thru the dmesg stuff,
the speaker spoke with a loud SQQQEAAALLL!
Unfortunately, my ear's are still ringing. Also am surprised that the speakers
didn't "blow"for which i would be greatful if they had because my ears
would be ringing as bad then.ouch!
using an sblive and do have a mic attached. wondering if there is a spot in
the programming where we can "manually" set to where we want to set the volume
at or if we wanted to "permanenly" mute the mic such as by "gmix" or something
(which of course is only temp until reboot)(lol...if one ever
reboots...lol...of course, gotta have my sim games!!!).
:-) You updated emu10k1 from cvs again I see, strange it removed the
modifications though. on or about line 619 of mixer.c change
{ SOUND_MIXER_MIX, 0xWhatever },
to
{ SOUND_MIXER_MIX, 0x },
The default record source is line 652
Re: [Cooker] still no go on hd.img (another recent rsync)
not really cause i got the drakx finding all partitions. (that was teh bug in the partitioner prg in drakex - or whatever). i've always, consistantly tried using the hd.img quite often..it's just being a pain in the butt program. mmm...never had a maxtor. mmm...i'll try that. On Mon, 21 Feb 2000, you wrote: On Mon, 21 Feb 2000, Roger wrote: lol, i've got roughly 20 gb of data on it. ..unless i can borrow an extra 20gb drive from somebody??? lol no i did not have to use that s/w. matter of fact all newer hdd's do not require that (or cannot even use it). most of the hdd's or already preformat It isn't the drive but the bios that has the problems, that would require translation software. And _all_ maxtors come unformated and unpartitioned, btw. anyways. when partitioning, i just use partition magic. never had this Thats the answer to your problem partition magic is hideing the partition most likely :) problem before. i'm guessing (sigh, again) that it's probabely just because it's with the hd.imgprobabely something missing between it and the cdrom install iso. (missing driver.not able to find the proper module settings etc...). *remember! this is a newer model hdd! all of my older hdd's are able to use the hd.img diskette. go figure. try finding the "cylinder limit" jumper and enableing it also -- Sent from: Lattitude (deg):32.7130 Longitude (deg):-117.1530 Altitude (ft): 410.0 GMT to Local (hrs): -8.0 (daylight savings enabled) Created with Linux-Mandrake 7.0! http://www.linux-mandrake.com/ Currently Beta Testing Mandrake Ver 7.0
Re: [Cooker] ouch! my eardrums
eh, dunno. i stopped compiling the source since mdk air and now have 7.0
running on everything. :)
have been doing an rsync freqently on this system.
On Mon, 21 Feb 2000, you wrote:
On Sun, 20 Feb 2000, Roger wrote:
Well, booting up my linux today and as it was scrolling thru the dmesg stuff,
the speaker spoke with a loud SQQQEAAALLL!
Unfortunately, my ear's are still ringing. Also am surprised that the speakers
didn't "blow"for which i would be greatful if they had because my ears
would be ringing as bad then.ouch!
using an sblive and do have a mic attached. wondering if there is a spot in
the programming where we can "manually" set to where we want to set the volume
at or if we wanted to "permanenly" mute the mic such as by "gmix" or something
(which of course is only temp until reboot)(lol...if one ever
reboots...lol...of course, gotta have my sim games!!!).
:-) You updated emu10k1 from cvs again I see, strange it removed the
modifications though. on or about line 619 of mixer.c change
{ SOUND_MIXER_MIX, 0xWhatever },
to
{ SOUND_MIXER_MIX, 0x },
The default record source is line 652
--
Sent from:
Lattitude (deg):32.7130
Longitude (deg):-117.1530
Altitude (ft): 410.0
GMT to Local (hrs): -8.0 (daylight savings enabled)
Created with Linux-Mandrake 7.0!
http://www.linux-mandrake.com/
Currently Beta Testing Mandrake Ver 7.0
[Cooker] Re: Gnome sound not working
from the quill of Axalon Bloodstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] on scroll [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Sun, 20 Feb 2000, Brian J. Murrell wrote: Probably but your the first to report it on a mdk system, theres an option to put in the esd.conf don't remeber it right now that fixes a spawning problem But I don't think this to be an "esd" problem though. That was the purpose of testing things like esdplay and xmms and finding them to be working even though gnome sound did not work. Any other ideas though? b. -- Brian J. Murrell InterLinx Support Services, Inc. North Vancouver, B.C. 604 983 UNIX Platform and Brand Independent UNIX Support - R3.2 - R4 - BSD
[Cooker] Re[2]: libgtop-1.1.5-0.1mdk
from the quill of Axalon Bloodstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] on scroll [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Mon, 21 Feb 2000, Brian J. Murrell wrote: well yeah libgtop won't install.. And things that need libgtop won't work because 1.1.3 will not be installed either. No. First off I never said to use nodeps. No you didn't. Somebody else did though. Did not mean to infer you did, sorry. You want to install it along side of the older version, breaking as little as posible in the mean time. Why even bother though? Why not wait for the rest (i.e. the dependant) of the packages to catch up? If you use nodeps you do not get told about the missing file (tracking it down now) in libgtop-1.1.5-0.1mdk (libgtop_sysdeps-1.1.so.5), it would be pretty much useless OK, another problem with it. :-) What happens if you force 1.1.5 on and then remove 1.1.3? Does any file that is the same name in both packages get removed with the 1.1.3 removal or is RPM smart enough to know that a given file, that was in 1.1.3 and then overwritten by 1.1.5 should not be removed when 1.1.3 is removed (with rpm -e)? b. You shouldn't have to force it, you would issue [ snip ] Once all the files linked to older libs are updated, you issue rpm --test -evv libgtop-1.1.3-Xmdk # Remove the obsolete libs Rpm will skip over the "common/newer" files when you erase the older rpm. Really? Holy smackers RPM is good! Bon? Oui! Tres bon! Merci beaucoup! b. -- Brian J. Murrell InterLinx Support Services, Inc. North Vancouver, B.C. 604 983 UNIX Platform and Brand Independent UNIX Support - R3.2 - R4 - BSD
