[Cooker] [Bug 3538] [Installation] mandrake-9.1 installer freezes

2003-03-25 Thread ndeb
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3538





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-03-26 08:26 ---
Both mdk-9.1rc1 and 9.1rc2 installed successfully on the same machine using 
the same install method. 



--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



--- Reminder: ---
assigned_to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
status: UNCONFIRMED
creation_date: 
description: 
I am trying to install mandrake-9.1 as follows:
- installation from iso (located on hard-drive)
- graphical mode used 
- install partition is ext2 (formatted and checked for bad blocks)

The installer always freezes at the point where I begin selection/deselection
of the individual packages. When I expand the tree list and unselect a
package, the mouse cursor starts flickering and then X freezes so that reboot
is the only way out.   

On the same machine, mandrake-9.0 can be installed smoothly using the exact
same method.
   
This bug is almost same as bug 2765 and may be related to bug 2014.



[Cooker] [Bug 3539] [Installation] New: mandrake-9.1 installer freezes

2003-03-25 Thread ndeb
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3539

   Product: Installation
 Component: Installation
   Summary: mandrake-9.1 installer freezes
   Version: 1.809
  Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


I am trying to install mandrake-9.1 as follows:
- installation from iso (located on hard-drive)
- graphical mode used 
- install partition is ext2 (formatted and checked for bad blocks)

The installer always freezes at the point where I begin selection/deselection
of the individual packages. When I expand the tree list and unselect a
package, the mouse cursor starts flickering and then X freezes so that reboot
is the only way out.   

On the same machine, mandrake-9.0 can be installed smoothly using the exact
same method.
   
This bug is almost same as bug 2765 and may be related to bug 2014.



--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



[Cooker] [Bug 3152] [mozilla] Fonts

2003-03-25 Thread d97mabo
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3152





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-03-26 07:57 ---
Yeah, clearly there is a problem with Mozilla. If this bug was allready present
in 1.2.1. It's kinda strange though, that they haven't fixed it in 1.3



--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



--- Reminder: ---
assigned_to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
status: UNCONFIRMED
creation_date: 
description: 
Fonts look good on most sites, but on some sites like cnn.com, c/net.com and
uk.yahoo.com news, the tops are missing on several characters which make it
difficult to read.



[Cooker] [Bug 3538] [Installation] New: mandrake-9.1 installer freezes

2003-03-25 Thread ndeb
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3538

   Product: Installation
 Component: Installation
   Summary: mandrake-9.1 installer freezes
   Version: 1.809
  Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


I am trying to install mandrake-9.1 as follows:
- installation from iso (located on hard-drive)
- graphical mode used 
- install partition is ext2 (formatted and checked for bad blocks)

The installer always freezes at the point where I begin selection/deselection
of the individual packages. When I expand the tree list and unselect a
package, the mouse cursor starts flickering and then X freezes so that reboot
is the only way out.   

On the same machine, mandrake-9.0 can be installed smoothly using the exact
same method.
   
This bug is almost same as bug 2765 and may be related to bug 2014.



--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



Re: [Cooker] Re: where is xev gone?

2003-03-25 Thread Bernd Niederberger
Am Mittwoch, 26. März 2003 00:38 schrieb David Walser:
> It's in the X11R6-contrib package.

OK, I found it.




[Cooker] harddrake's menu item brings up logdrake?

2003-03-25 Thread Vincent Meyer, MD
Hi,

Loaded 9.1 release today, and while playing tried launching harddrake from 
the menu in KDE.  After getting the password from me for root access, it 
launched logdrake instead!

I didn't see this in a quick bugzilla search, and would file a bug report, 
but is it a harddrake packageing bug or a logdrake packageing bug?

BTW - 9.1 rocks.

V.



[Cooker] [Bug 1702] [lilo] Lilo does not load successfully

2003-03-25 Thread wjl
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1702





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-03-26 06:06 ---
I've seen a similar problem with LILO, except instead of 99's I get 40's (i.e. L40 40 
40 40 40 40... 
for several lines). I've seen this on several different computers that are completely 
different 
architectures (AMD's and Intels of various ages). Usually loading up the CD rescue 
disk and 
reinstalling the bootloader makes it work; sometimes I have to do that twice before it 
does.  
 
The only suspicious hardware that any of those computers share in common is a PCI 
UDMA/66 
controller that comes with Maxtor 80G HD's, although I also have computers with that 
controller 
in it that have never had any lilo problems. With out lilo or anything, windows, of 
course, never 
has any problems booting---but I don't really care if windows boots. ;) 
 
Anyway, I've seen this off and on since around the Mandrake 8.2 time frame. I've also 
had (on 
the same computers) GRUB occasionally fail in a similar way (it writes "GRUB" then 
nothing, 
and hangs). 



--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



--- Reminder: ---
assigned_to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
status: UNCONFIRMED
creation_date: 
description: 
Hardware
Motherboard: Asus A7N8X Deluxe (w/ SATA) and nVIDIA geForce2 chipset

Error:
I was able to get through a complete install of linux-mandrake 9.1 beta 3. 
However, when I reboot my system and Lilo is attempting to load, all I see on 
the screen is the letter "L" and a pattern like this:

L99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99... etc

It repeats the 9's for like 5 or 6 lines. Any clues?

P.S. - virus protection on board is turned off.



Re: [Cooker] tightvnc-server, no desktop or window manager started

2003-03-25 Thread Bob Brickey
The fix below worked fine with 9.1RC2, but it doen't work with the 9.1 
release version.  vncserver is unusable with KDE.  I haven't tried gnome 
yet.

 -Bob

From: Greg Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Cooker] GNOME 2.2.1 Desktop
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 21:04:30 -0500
On Tuesday 18 March 2003 08:54 pm, Greg Meyer wrote:

> > Greg,
> >
> >If you want I can send these rpms to you for verification.
>
> I just rebuilt qt with the 3.1.1-12 spec file from cvs and the problem 
is
> gone.  Laurent applied a patch for -13 that turned on AA by default.  
See
> my other posting for the contents of the patch.  I am very sorry that 
this
> did not get done in time for 9.1  I am not sure that the AA on
> functionality would have been given up to enable this anyway.  It would
> seem to me that the WoW factor of the font rendering might be worth this
> bug if it means good reviews.  At least I have a qt that works and can 
now
> happily upgrade.

For anyone that wants to test, I have posted the libqt3.1.1-12mdk rpms that 
I
rebuilt here:

http://cybercfo.gkmweb.com/RPMS

They should finish uploading at about 2:30 AM UCT (9:30 EST for the time 
zone
challenged in the US)

Because these are hastily built on my cooker box, I did not apply the patch 
to
eliminate the libGLcore.so depends caused by my nVidia drivers, so you will
have to install these with

"rpm -Uvh libqt3* --nodeps --oldpackage"

--
Greg
_
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail




[Cooker] [Bug 1702] [lilo] Lilo does not load successfully

2003-03-25 Thread bakersoft_corp
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1702





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-03-26 05:31 ---
Created an attachment (id=398)
 --> (http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/attachment.cgi?id=398&action=view)
LIL Boot problem




--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



--- Reminder: ---
assigned_to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
status: UNCONFIRMED
creation_date: 
description: 
Hardware
Motherboard: Asus A7N8X Deluxe (w/ SATA) and nVIDIA geForce2 chipset

Error:
I was able to get through a complete install of linux-mandrake 9.1 beta 3. 
However, when I reboot my system and Lilo is attempting to load, all I see on 
the screen is the letter "L" and a pattern like this:

L99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99... etc

It repeats the 9's for like 5 or 6 lines. Any clues?

P.S. - virus protection on board is turned off.



[Cooker] [Bug 2070] [lilo] Graphical lilo changes back to text before graphical boot

2003-03-25 Thread bakersoft_corp
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2070





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-03-26 05:28 ---
Created an attachment (id=397)
 --> (http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/attachment.cgi?id=397&action=view)
Problem with LILO booting from hard drive




--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



--- Reminder: ---
assigned_to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
status: NEW
creation_date: 
description: 
When using the graphical lilo menu AND using the graphical boot (800x600) for
displaying the boot messages in the nice white Mandrake window (looks like the
same window as the graphical lilo menu), just after hitting "linux" in the menu,
the screen changes to text stating Loading Linux .  and after a few moments
switches to the graphical boot messages.

This was also present in the early 9.0 betas and RCs, but was fixed by the 9.0
release.  It seems to have re-surfaced and while it doesn't stop anything from
booting, it does look bad.

If the graphical boot is selected, then the screen should revert back to text
before showing the graphical image.



[Cooker] [Bug 1702] [lilo] Lilo does not load successfully

2003-03-25 Thread bakersoft_corp
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1702





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-03-26 05:25 ---
Alright, I finally got back to this. After downloading Mandrake 9.1 rc2, I 
discovered I still have the same problem with the 9's all over the screen when 
it tries to load from my drive. So I created a boot disk during setup, and I 
have your bug file now! Hooray! So hopefully this can provide some useful 
feedback and clear this issue up for me.



--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



--- Reminder: ---
assigned_to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
status: UNCONFIRMED
creation_date: 
description: 
Hardware
Motherboard: Asus A7N8X Deluxe (w/ SATA) and nVIDIA geForce2 chipset

Error:
I was able to get through a complete install of linux-mandrake 9.1 beta 3. 
However, when I reboot my system and Lilo is attempting to load, all I see on 
the screen is the letter "L" and a pattern like this:

L99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99... etc

It repeats the 9's for like 5 or 6 lines. Any clues?

P.S. - virus protection on board is turned off.



[Cooker] [Bug 117] [kernel] xawtv crashes system (Zoltrix TV MAX) LM9.0beta3

2003-03-25 Thread bmail10
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=117

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-03-26 05:00 ---
FYI

I have found in the past that I have trouble with
xawtv if I don't have a .xawtv file for it to read. 
So after re-installing LM9.1rc2, I ran scantv (NTSC,
US-CABLE) and made a .xawtv file from its output. 
Scantv seemed to work fine and detected all the
channels it should have.

I tried xawtv -remote (I have found in the past that
the -remote option will work, whereas if I just run
xawtv, the system will crash).  xawtv displayed a
black screen, but the audio was fine.  I could switch
channels and the audio would switch, but still no
picture.

Then I tried xawtv -noxv as you asked.  For a nano
second, I saw a picture and heard sound, and then the
system crashed and locked up with a bunch of blue and
white vertical bars on the CRT.

After rebooting and fixing the root partition during
bootup, I tried xawtv -remote -noxv (not knowing if
this even makes sense).  Again I saw a black screen
and heard audio.  Then when I tried to change
channels, the system crashed and locked up again.

What next?


swap.


__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop!
http://platinum.yahoo.com




--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



--- Reminder: ---
assigned_to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
status: ASSIGNED
creation_date: 
description: 
I did an expert install of Mandrake-Linux 9.0 beta3 after downloading the 
iso's, verifying the md5sums, and burning them on 700MB CD-RW's.  I've tried 
autodetect for the card and tuner.  I've tried selecting Zoltrix TV MAX from 
the list.  I've tried Temic type NTSC (4032 FY5) (which is what I think my 
tuner is (type=6 option to module tuner))and type Temic (4036 FY5).  (I'm 
positive my tuner is a Temic NTSC model.)  First of all the scan for channels 
finds nothing, and then after xawtv starts within less than a minute the screen 
either goes all white, or has white and blue vertical bars and the system is 
locked up and I have to reboot.  Before the system locks, the xawtv display is 
mostly black with with some horizontal white traces running through it (i.e. it 
looks like static)  I must say, I have gotten xawtv to run on a variety of
distributions, Caldera, Mandrake 7.0. Redhat 6.2 so I believe my hardware
is good.  It works fine under Windows 98.  I must also say, my results
with xawtv have varied from time to time too.  Sometimes I've had the
same problem with the above mentioned distributions.

This is my system:

Motherboard:FIC VA-503+
Processor:  K6-2 500MHz
RAM:256MB PC133 RAM @ 100MHz FSB
HardDrive:  IBM-DJNA-371350 13.7GB 7200RPM
Video Card: AOpen PG975 AGP 4MB (Trident PG975 AGP)
Sound:  Pine 3D Wavetable Sound (Uses Crystal 4235 ISA Sound)
TV Card:Zoltrix TVMAX
CD-RW#1:Mitsumi 48X9TE CD-RW 24x10x40
CD-RW#2:HP CD Writer Plus 4x4x24
USB Device: INTEL Pro Share Web Camera
Network Card:   3COM 3C905B
Monitor:Samsung SyncMaster 700IFT
Printer:HP600C
Mouse:  PS2 Wheel type clone
Other Boards:   Generic Brand ISA I/O 2-8250 Serial, 
1 Parallel Used, HDD and floppy
disabled.

4 Partitions on the hard drive:  hda1 - 6.2 GB Windows 98,
 hda2 - 45.6 MB linux ext3 /boot,
 hda3 - 5.8 GB linux ext3 /,
 hda4 - 512 MB linux swap.



Re: [Cooker] SUB cooker

2003-03-25 Thread James Sparenberg




















Not sure but I think someone is having a problem with their e-mail
client :) (ps the lines above are to let you know I'm bottom posting not
top posting.)

James





Re: [Cooker] Is 9.1 finished?

2003-03-25 Thread James Sparenberg
On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 18:30, Damian Gatabria wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 de March 2003 22:42, Levi Ramsey wrote:
> > On Tue Mar 25 22:18 -0300, Damian Gatabria wrote:
> > > > What is the official position?
> > >
> > > Missionary. Boy on top.
> >
> > Anything else is illegal in some places...
> 
> Yes, yes, compatibility comes to mind when you have to 
> choose your position.. Of course you don't want to 
> try to make everyone happy... it can be dangerous... you
> can get portscanned and your socket compromised..
> 
> Damian

ROTFLMAO
> 




[Cooker] [Bug 3537] [kernel] New: APCI fails on MSI 6547 system board

2003-03-25 Thread deryk
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3537

   Product: kernel
 Component: booting
   Summary: APCI fails on MSI 6547 system board
   Version: 2.4.21-0.13mdk
  Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Problem: 
Using the 2.4.21-0.13mdk kernel leads to apparent interrupt conflicts between devices 
installed 
on this system using the MSi 6547 system board.  These symptoms exist when setting the 
BIOS to APIC revision 1.1 or 1.4.  The first signs of trouble during boot are seen 
when the 
Advansys SCSI module attempts to probe the bus for devices followed later on during 
the boot 
process by the ethernet adapter, bt878 device, and USB subsystem. 
 
Solution: 
Disable APIC in the BIOS or pass "pci=noapci" via the bootloader config or the 
commandline. 
 
Information: 
lspci -vvv output can be obtained here: 
http://fragfest.homelinux.net:81/test/lspciout.txt 
dmesg output can be obtained here: 
http://fragfest.homelinux.net:81/test/dmesgout.txt 
 
This problem has existed and required the bootloader option since after kernel 
2.4.18.8.2mdk-1-3mdk.  I had just hoped things would get sorted out sooner or later as 
there 
had been quite a few bugs related to this subsystem.



--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



Re: [Cooker] Is 9.1 finished?

2003-03-25 Thread Levi Ramsey
On Tue Mar 25 23:30 -0300, Damian Gatabria wrote:
> > Anything else is illegal in some places...
> 
> Yes, yes, compatibility comes to mind when you have to 
> choose your position.. Of course you don't want to 
> try to make everyone happy... it can be dangerous... you
> can get portscanned and your socket compromised..

I suggest using a latex-based firewall, to avoid viruses and child
processes...

-- 
Levi Ramsey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The food of love is Mandrake root.
GPG Fingerprint: 354C 7A02 77C5 9EE7 8538  4E8D DCD9 B4B0 DC35 67CD
Currently playing: Scott Williams - Nothing Else Matters
Linux 2.4.21-0.13mdk
 22:10:00 up 2 days,  2:29, 10 users,  load average: 0.59, 0.69, 0.73



[Cooker] [Bug 2851] [kernel] lircd does not create /dev/lirc/0

2003-03-25 Thread deryk
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2851





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-03-26 04:06 ---
Yes, this is still valid.  Tested with the latest kernel release available on cooker 
as of 
26.Mar.03 



--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



--- Reminder: ---
assigned_to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
status: NEW
creation_date: 
description: 
With the latest cooker update from 6th of March, lircd does not create /dev/lirc/0.  I 
am taking 
a stab in the dark and assuming that because I run a system with devfs that the module 
is not 
creating the devfs entry. 
 
Changing /etc/sysconfig/lircd from: 
 
(this results in lircmd and crew not being able to communicate with the kernel space 
portion of 
this and hence all the problems that arrise from that) 
 
# The device node that communicates with the IR device. 
 
# with devfs enabled 
DEVICE=/dev/lirc/0 
 
# without devfs 
#DEVICE=/dev/lirc 
 
To: 
 
# The device node that communicates with the IR device. 
 
# with devfs enabled 
#DEVICE=/dev/lirc/0 
 
# without devfs 
DEVICE=/dev/lirc 
 
Fixes the problem and all other remaining mdk packages work as expected (tested with 
irw 
and xawtv).  I've banged my head about this one for a month or so now since getting my 
new 
PV951 tuner card and just decided to have another dig at it.  Hopefully this will get 
fixed for the 
final release.



Re: [Cooker] Is 9.1 finished?

2003-03-25 Thread Damian Gatabria
On Tuesday 25 de March 2003 22:42, Levi Ramsey wrote:
> On Tue Mar 25 22:18 -0300, Damian Gatabria wrote:
> > > What is the official position?
> >
> > Missionary. Boy on top.
>
> Anything else is illegal in some places...

Yes, yes, compatibility comes to mind when you have to 
choose your position.. Of course you don't want to 
try to make everyone happy... it can be dangerous... you
can get portscanned and your socket compromised..

Damian



Re: [Cooker] Is 9.1 finished?

2003-03-25 Thread Damian Gatabria
On Tuesday 25 de March 2003 22:17, James Sparenberg wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 17:18, Damian Gatabria wrote:
> > > What is the official position?
> >
> > Missionary. Boy on top.
>
> Boys are fine for you maybe but I had in mind something with a bit
> different architecture. *grin*

Umm.. why was I included in "the official position"? I don't
know who the boy is or what is he doing to what.  :oP




[Cooker] [Bug 3536] [kdebase] New: can't get acess from remote X-Server

2003-03-25 Thread david
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3536

   Product: kdebase
 Component: kdebase
   Summary: can't get acess from remote X-Server
   Version: 3.1-83mdk
  Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: major
  Priority: P2
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Since 9.1RC2 I can't get access from a remote X-Server (RC1 is OK). This 
problem is still present in RC3. In /var/log/messages there is a messgae about 
the greater aborting.

This may be a problem with msec.



--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



[Cooker] [Bug 3535] [drakxtools] New: changes in settings don't persist

2003-03-25 Thread david
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3535

   Product: drakxtools
 Component: DrakSec
   Summary: changes in settings don't persist
   Version: 9.1-26mdk
  Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: major
  Priority: P2
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Starting with 9.1RC2, I can no longer access the system from a remote X server. 
This problem exists in RC3. While this may be a problem with XDMCP or KDM, I 
noticed that if I make changes under draksec, they don't persist. That is, if 
change the settings of list_tcp, from default to ALL, then restart draksec, 
then all settings have reverted to default again.



--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



Re: [Cooker] Is 9.1 finished?

2003-03-25 Thread Levi Ramsey
On Tue Mar 25 22:18 -0300, Damian Gatabria wrote:
> >
> > What is the official position?
> 
> Missionary. Boy on top.

Anything else is illegal in some places...

-- 
Levi Ramsey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The food of love is Mandrake root.
GPG Fingerprint: 354C 7A02 77C5 9EE7 8538  4E8D DCD9 B4B0 DC35 67CD
Currently playing: Rush - Subdivisions
Linux 2.4.21-0.13mdk
 20:40:00 up 2 days, 59 min,  8 users,  load average: 0.35, 0.38, 0.32



[Cooker] SUB cooker

2003-03-25 Thread Sitsofe Wheeler




Re: [Cooker] Re: Re: Re: Requires & Provides on -devel packages (Continued)

2003-03-25 Thread Per Øyvind Karlsen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 26 March 2003 02:12, David Walser wrote:
> Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Wednesday 26 March 2003 00:28, David Walser wrote:
> >> Buchan Milne wrote:
> >> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >> > Hash: SHA1
> >> >
> >> > Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
> >> >> On Topic:
> >> >> Is there a way to exclude files from a %files list? Quite some of
> >> >> these duplicate because for instance the files for the icewm-light
> >> >> theme is also included in icewm. Would be nice if these files can
> >> >> excluded from a job.
> >> >>
> >> >> %files -n package1
> >> >> %{_bindir}/* !%{_binddir}/dont_want_this_here
> >> >>
> >> >> %files -n package1
> >> >> %{_binddir}/dont_want_this_here
> >> >>
> >> >> to avoid duplication = save ISO space.
> >> >
> >> > %exclude?
> >> > %files -n package1
> >> > %{_bindir}/*
> >> > %exclude %{_binddir}/dont_want_this_here
> >> >
> >> > Regards,
> >> > Buchan
> >>
> >> Is that just how you'd want the syntax to look, or is that an actual
> >> currently working possibility?
> >>
> >> If there was some such functionality, I could add one more popular
> >> plugin to my SquirrelMail package.
> >
> > I did something like this which where partially working in the dsniff
> > package..
> >
> > %defattr(-,root,root)
> > %doc CHANGES README TODO
> > %dir %{_sysconfdir}/%{name}
> > %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/%{name}/*
> > %{_sbindir}/*[!webspy]
> > #have to manually add these two to the list, don't ask me *why*, but if
> > not, it won't be included
> > %{_sbindir}/tcpnice
> > %{_sbindir}/sshow
> > %{_mandir}/man8/*[!webspy]
>
> Doesn't that mean anything that doesn't end in the letters w, e, b, s, p,
> or y?
hmm, it does? might be, just a result of me playing around..
>
> > %files webspy
> > %defattr(-,root,root)
> > %{_sbindir}/webspy
> > %{_mandir}/man8/webspy.8*
> >
> > - --
> > Regards,
> > Per Øyvind Karlsen
> > Sintrax Solutions
> > http://www.sintrax.net - +47 41681061
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> > Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
> >
> > iD8DBQE+gP3iv8F7V9JOSuURAoOGAJ4uxZM/NL8vszCYy0rHcYX5EhMwogCfc0Lb
> > 4d8GF0EYEixSlqbnHG21Cnc=
> > =3drS
> > -END PGP SIGNATURE-

- -- 
Regards,
Per Øyvind Karlsen
Sintrax Solutions
http://www.sintrax.net - +47 41681061
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+gQMTv8F7V9JOSuURAl9KAJ46uwJkBLt2Zuf7PgkEi5ivSaqWiACfTJEU
LSU/VeJyeM+ziuFJ9huECyQ=
=qdwX
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] Is 9.1 finished?

2003-03-25 Thread James Sparenberg
On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 17:18, Damian Gatabria wrote:
> >
> > What is the official position?
> 
> Missionary. Boy on top.

Boys are fine for you maybe but I had in mind something with a bit
different architecture. *grin*
 
> 
> Damian
> 
> 
> 




Re: [Cooker] Is 9.1 finished?

2003-03-25 Thread paul mccarthy
The missionary is on the bottom

- Original Message - 
From: "Damian Gatabria" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 5:18 PM
Subject: Re: [Cooker] Is 9.1 finished?


> >
> > What is the official position?
> 
> Missionary. Boy on top.
> 
> Damian
> 
> 
> 
> 



Re: [Cooker] Is 9.1 finished?

2003-03-25 Thread Damian Gatabria
>
> What is the official position?

Missionary. Boy on top.

Damian





[Cooker] Re: Re: Re: Requires & Provides on -devel packages (Continued)

2003-03-25 Thread David Walser
Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:

> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On Wednesday 26 March 2003 00:28, David Walser wrote:
>> Buchan Milne wrote:
>> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> > Hash: SHA1
>> >
>> > Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
>> >> On Topic:
>> >> Is there a way to exclude files from a %files list? Quite some of these
>> >> duplicate because for instance the files for the icewm-light theme is
>> >> also included in icewm. Would be nice if these files can excluded from a
>> >> job.
>> >>
>> >> %files -n package1
>> >> %{_bindir}/* !%{_binddir}/dont_want_this_here
>> >>
>> >> %files -n package1
>> >> %{_binddir}/dont_want_this_here
>> >>
>> >> to avoid duplication = save ISO space.
>> >
>> > %exclude?
>> > %files -n package1
>> > %{_bindir}/*
>> > %exclude %{_binddir}/dont_want_this_here
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Buchan
>>
>> Is that just how you'd want the syntax to look, or is that an actual
>> currently working possibility?
>>
>> If there was some such functionality, I could add one more popular plugin
>> to my SquirrelMail package.
> I did something like this which where partially working in the dsniff 
> package..
> 
> %defattr(-,root,root)
> %doc CHANGES README TODO
> %dir %{_sysconfdir}/%{name}
> %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/%{name}/*
> %{_sbindir}/*[!webspy]
> #have to manually add these two to the list, don't ask me *why*, but if not, 
> it won't be included
> %{_sbindir}/tcpnice
> %{_sbindir}/sshow
> %{_mandir}/man8/*[!webspy]

Doesn't that mean anything that doesn't end in the letters w, e, b, s, p, or y?

> %files webspy
> %defattr(-,root,root)
> %{_sbindir}/webspy
> %{_mandir}/man8/webspy.8*
> 
> - -- 
> Regards,
> Per Øyvind Karlsen
> Sintrax Solutions
> http://www.sintrax.net - +47 41681061
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iD8DBQE+gP3iv8F7V9JOSuURAoOGAJ4uxZM/NL8vszCYy0rHcYX5EhMwogCfc0Lb
> 4d8GF0EYEixSlqbnHG21Cnc=
> =3drS
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
> 
> 
> 





Re: [Cooker] Re: Re: Requires & Provides on -devel packages (Continued)

2003-03-25 Thread Per Øyvind Karlsen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 26 March 2003 00:28, David Walser wrote:
> Buchan Milne wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
> >> On Topic:
> >> Is there a way to exclude files from a %files list? Quite some of these
> >> duplicate because for instance the files for the icewm-light theme is
> >> also included in icewm. Would be nice if these files can excluded from a
> >> job.
> >>
> >> %files -n package1
> >> %{_bindir}/* !%{_binddir}/dont_want_this_here
> >>
> >> %files -n package1
> >> %{_binddir}/dont_want_this_here
> >>
> >> to avoid duplication = save ISO space.
> >
> > %exclude?
> > %files -n package1
> > %{_bindir}/*
> > %exclude %{_binddir}/dont_want_this_here
> >
> > Regards,
> > Buchan
>
> Is that just how you'd want the syntax to look, or is that an actual
> currently working possibility?
>
> If there was some such functionality, I could add one more popular plugin
> to my SquirrelMail package.
I did something like this which where partially working in the dsniff 
package..

%defattr(-,root,root)
%doc CHANGES README TODO
%dir %{_sysconfdir}/%{name}
%config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/%{name}/*
%{_sbindir}/*[!webspy]
#have to manually add these two to the list, don't ask me *why*, but if not, 
it won't be included
%{_sbindir}/tcpnice
%{_sbindir}/sshow
%{_mandir}/man8/*[!webspy]

%files webspy
%defattr(-,root,root)
%{_sbindir}/webspy
%{_mandir}/man8/webspy.8*

- -- 
Regards,
Per Øyvind Karlsen
Sintrax Solutions
http://www.sintrax.net - +47 41681061
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+gP3iv8F7V9JOSuURAoOGAJ4uxZM/NL8vszCYy0rHcYX5EhMwogCfc0Lb
4d8GF0EYEixSlqbnHG21Cnc=
=3drS
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




[Cooker] [Bug 2097] [drakxtools] NTFS partition is not recognized properly

2003-03-25 Thread david
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-03-26 02:07 ---
*** This bug has been confirmed by popular vote. ***



--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



--- Reminder: ---
assigned_to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
status: NEW
creation_date: 
description: 
When installing RC1, and after completing the installation, diskdrake thought that 
/dev/hda1 was 
"Hidden IFS (e.g. HPFS)", and generated a fstab that would not allow the partition to 
be 
mounted.  By selecting NTFS in the fstab, the partition would mount and work properly. 
 
There was some discussion about NTFS being detected as HPFS before on the cooker list. 
 
This appaears to be neither detecting as NTFS or HPFS, but as some variant of HPFS.  
Since 
Windows XP generated the partition in question, this may be an issue for many first 
time users.



[Cooker] [Bug 1349] [Hardware] orinoco pcmcia

2003-03-25 Thread g.rousse
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1349





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-03-26 01:42 ---
Please update drivers to version 0.13c, it solves this issue, and avoid lock when 
removing the 
card? 



--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



--- Reminder: ---
assigned_to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
status: RESOLVED
creation_date: 
description: 
mandrake 9.1b3 fail to install my orinoco pcmcia but 9.1b2 is ok



Re: [Cooker] Problems with the xserver

2003-03-25 Thread James Sparenberg
On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 15:17, James Sparenberg wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 14:49, Richard Ketchersid wrote:
> > Very often now when running xemacs and mozilla simultaneously the 
> > following situation arrises. (This is with latest cooker, but has been 
> > happening for a couple of months now.)
> > 
> >  o I cannot type in mozilla, i.e. text entry fields stop working.
> > 
> > I can fix this by
> >  o Switching to a terminal and typing some random characters. When I 
> >return to mozilla I can type again. 
> 
> I can verify that this has nothing to do with xemacs... I've got a
> mozilla that does this as well.  I'm using the driver for the Rage
> Mobility chip (Mach 64 I believe) here It happens randomly.  I however
> haven't been able to get it to unlock and have found that the only thing
> useful is xkill to get rid of the window and kill -9
> /usr/lib/mozilla1-3/mozilla-bin to get rid of all the processes. Since I
> had been having all kinds of fun do to trying to use an orinoco_cs
> wireless card (it digitized a number of files) I thought I might have
> caused it. Perhaps not.
> 
> James

Seems to be a problem with Mozilla... How to proceed should one of us
submit to them or should one of the people for MDK do it?  

James

> 
> > 
> >  o At the same time xemacs looses contact with the server and spits out a 
> >bunch of messages like the following:
> > 
> > ==
> > 
> > xemacs: X Error of failed request:  BadWindow (invalid Window parameter)
> >   Major opcode of failed request:  25 (X_SendEvent)
> >   Resource id in failed request:  0x2600399
> >   Serial number of failed request:  437549
> >   Current serial number in output stream:  437550
> > Xlib: unexpected async reply (sequence 0x6ad2e)!
> > 
> > xemacs: X Error of failed request:  BadWindow (invalid Window parameter)
> >   Major opcode of failed request:  18 (X_ChangeProperty)
> >   Resource id in failed request:  0x2600399
> >   Serial number of failed request:  437548
> >   Current serial number in output stream:  437550
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > The really bad thing is that xemacs does not autosave when this happens 
> > and I am repeatedly loosing work. I sure would be nice if someone knew how 
> > to fix this.
> 
> 




Re: [Cooker] Problems with the xserver

2003-03-25 Thread Brook Humphrey
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Tuesday 25 March 2003 02:49 pm, Richard Ketchersid wrote:
> Very often now when running xemacs and mozilla simultaneously the
> following situation arrises. (This is with latest cooker, but has been
> happening for a couple of months now.)
>
>  o I cannot type in mozilla, i.e. text entry fields stop working.
I can verify this also. In my case it definitely is only mozila. To solve it I 
downloaded the latest nightly build of mozilla and run that instead. Maybe 
not the most elegant way to do it but it works for me

>
> I can fix this by
>  o Switching to a terminal and typing some random characters. When I
>return to mozilla I can type again.
>
>  o At the same time xemacs looses contact with the server and spits out a
>bunch of messages like the following:
>
> ==
>
> xemacs: X Error of failed request:  BadWindow (invalid Window parameter)
>   Major opcode of failed request:  25 (X_SendEvent)
>   Resource id in failed request:  0x2600399
>   Serial number of failed request:  437549
>   Current serial number in output stream:  437550
> Xlib: unexpected async reply (sequence 0x6ad2e)!
>
> xemacs: X Error of failed request:  BadWindow (invalid Window parameter)
>   Major opcode of failed request:  18 (X_ChangeProperty)
>   Resource id in failed request:  0x2600399
>   Serial number of failed request:  437548
>   Current serial number in output stream:  437550
>
> 
>
> The really bad thing is that xemacs does not autosave when this happens
> and I am repeatedly loosing work. I sure would be nice if someone knew how
> to fix this.

- -- 
 -~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-
  Brook Humphrey   
Mobile PC Medic, 420 1st, Cheney, WA 99004, 509-235-9107
http://www.webmedic.net, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]   
 Holiness unto the Lord
 -~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+gOhynT1TkA6FgPgRAjDZAJ9bke8toZ7l8h94R7zLinYFm99uuwCdHV/D
oiOnbEQX09QvRf1CMHCE9XI=
=N0kg
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




[Cooker] Re: where is xev gone?

2003-03-25 Thread David Walser
It's in the X11R6-contrib package.

Bernd Niederberger wrote:
> Hi everybody,
> 
> I 've installed Mandrake 9.1-rc3 and I am missing xev.
> Has anybody an idea where it is?
> 
> Regards
>  Bernd




Re: [Cooker] Problems with the xserver

2003-03-25 Thread James Sparenberg
On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 14:49, Richard Ketchersid wrote:
> Very often now when running xemacs and mozilla simultaneously the 
> following situation arrises. (This is with latest cooker, but has been 
> happening for a couple of months now.)
> 
>  o I cannot type in mozilla, i.e. text entry fields stop working.
> 
> I can fix this by
>  o Switching to a terminal and typing some random characters. When I 
>return to mozilla I can type again. 

I can verify that this has nothing to do with xemacs... I've got a
mozilla that does this as well.  I'm using the driver for the Rage
Mobility chip (Mach 64 I believe) here It happens randomly.  I however
haven't been able to get it to unlock and have found that the only thing
useful is xkill to get rid of the window and kill -9
/usr/lib/mozilla1-3/mozilla-bin to get rid of all the processes. Since I
had been having all kinds of fun do to trying to use an orinoco_cs
wireless card (it digitized a number of files) I thought I might have
caused it. Perhaps not.

James

> 
>  o At the same time xemacs looses contact with the server and spits out a 
>bunch of messages like the following:
> 
> ==
> 
> xemacs: X Error of failed request:  BadWindow (invalid Window parameter)
>   Major opcode of failed request:  25 (X_SendEvent)
>   Resource id in failed request:  0x2600399
>   Serial number of failed request:  437549
>   Current serial number in output stream:  437550
> Xlib: unexpected async reply (sequence 0x6ad2e)!
> 
> xemacs: X Error of failed request:  BadWindow (invalid Window parameter)
>   Major opcode of failed request:  18 (X_ChangeProperty)
>   Resource id in failed request:  0x2600399
>   Serial number of failed request:  437548
>   Current serial number in output stream:  437550
> 
> 
> 
> The really bad thing is that xemacs does not autosave when this happens 
> and I am repeatedly loosing work. I sure would be nice if someone knew how 
> to fix this.




[Cooker] Re: Re: Requires & Provides on -devel packages (Continued)

2003-03-25 Thread David Walser
Buchan Milne wrote:

> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
> 
>> On Topic:
>> Is there a way to exclude files from a %files list? Quite some of these
>> duplicate because for instance the files for the icewm-light theme is also
>> included in icewm. Would be nice if these files can excluded from a job.
>>
>> %files -n package1
>> %{_bindir}/* !%{_binddir}/dont_want_this_here
>>
>> %files -n package1
>> %{_binddir}/dont_want_this_here
>>
>> to avoid duplication = save ISO space.
>>
> 
> %exclude?
> %files -n package1
> %{_bindir}/*
> %exclude %{_binddir}/dont_want_this_here
> 
> Regards,
> Buchan

Is that just how you'd want the syntax to look, or is that an actual currently working 
possibility?

If there was some such functionality, I could add one more popular plugin to my 
SquirrelMail package.




Re: [Cooker] Problems with the xserver

2003-03-25 Thread Crispin Boylan
hi
this happens to me too, its very strange, I thought it was due to me 
having a recompiled mozill with gcc 3.2, but the problem exists with the 
normal cooker mozilla too
- its only recently started happening for me though.

Cheers
cris.
Richard Ketchersid wrote:

Very often now when running xemacs and mozilla simultaneously the 
following situation arrises. (This is with latest cooker, but has been 
happening for a couple of months now.)

o I cannot type in mozilla, i.e. text entry fields stop working.

I can fix this by
o Switching to a terminal and typing some random characters. When I 
  return to mozilla I can type again. 

o At the same time xemacs looses contact with the server and spits out a 
  bunch of messages like the following:

==

xemacs: X Error of failed request:  BadWindow (invalid Window parameter)
 Major opcode of failed request:  25 (X_SendEvent)
 Resource id in failed request:  0x2600399
 Serial number of failed request:  437549
 Current serial number in output stream:  437550
Xlib: unexpected async reply (sequence 0x6ad2e)!
   
xemacs: X Error of failed request:  BadWindow (invalid Window parameter)
 Major opcode of failed request:  18 (X_ChangeProperty)
 Resource id in failed request:  0x2600399
 Serial number of failed request:  437548
 Current serial number in output stream:  437550



The really bad thing is that xemacs does not autosave when this happens 
and I am repeatedly loosing work. I sure would be nice if someone knew how 
to fix this.

 






Re: [Cooker] RC3, 3 CD's over 650MB??

2003-03-25 Thread James Sparenberg
On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 03:11, Buchan Milne wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> James Sparenberg wrote:
> > On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 13:02, Pierre Jarillon wrote:
> >
> >>Le Lundi 24 Mars 2003 21:51, Jason Greenwood a écrit :
> >>
> >>>Didn't Mandrake decide to keep the ISO's under 650MB??
> >>
> >>Nowadays, all the CD are 700M except some RW.
> >>A their cost is about 0.5¤, I don't see for which reason it would be
> >>better to keep the ISO's under 650MB
> >
> > Despite the fact that a large amount of media is 700mb a large number of
> > CDR drives out there won't do 700mb due to age. (they aren't really that
> > old either. Last time I saw one for sale was about 3 months ago.)
> >
> 
> More importantly, there is a much larger installed base of CD-ROM
> drives, and many machines that are capable of running Mandrake may
> potentially have such a drive.
> 
> Buchan

True enough... I've got about 4 or 5 of em in the parts bin(really
gotta hit a flea market with some of the this stuff... nah..)

James

> 
> - --
> |--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
> Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
> Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x121
> Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
> GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
> 1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> 
> iD8DBQE+gDlhrJK6UGDSBKcRApgfAJ9mMVxk6GVDI1MBOgqBwCgLBaQZ0QCgw8in
> t2PzksEbZG0+OlKCq6EJVCc=
> =n3y6
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
> 
> 




[Cooker] Problems with the xserver

2003-03-25 Thread Richard Ketchersid

Very often now when running xemacs and mozilla simultaneously the 
following situation arrises. (This is with latest cooker, but has been 
happening for a couple of months now.)

 o I cannot type in mozilla, i.e. text entry fields stop working.

I can fix this by
 o Switching to a terminal and typing some random characters. When I 
   return to mozilla I can type again. 

 o At the same time xemacs looses contact with the server and spits out a 
   bunch of messages like the following:

==

xemacs: X Error of failed request:  BadWindow (invalid Window parameter)
  Major opcode of failed request:  25 (X_SendEvent)
  Resource id in failed request:  0x2600399
  Serial number of failed request:  437549
  Current serial number in output stream:  437550
Xlib: unexpected async reply (sequence 0x6ad2e)!

xemacs: X Error of failed request:  BadWindow (invalid Window parameter)
  Major opcode of failed request:  18 (X_ChangeProperty)
  Resource id in failed request:  0x2600399
  Serial number of failed request:  437548
  Current serial number in output stream:  437550



The really bad thing is that xemacs does not autosave when this happens 
and I am repeatedly loosing work. I sure would be nice if someone knew how 
to fix this.

-- 
Best,
  Richard Ketchersid



[Cooker] [Bug 749] [msec] hosts.deny updating by msec

2003-03-25 Thread langles
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=749





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-03-25 23:25 ---
I encountered this as well in Mandrake 9.1 that I installed from scratch today.
 This is on a MSI 6368L Motherboard (with integrated video, audio, and ethernet).



--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



--- Reminder: ---
assigned_to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
status: UNCONFIRMED
creation_date: 
description: 
After setting msec to level 4 we notice that : 
Jan  7 07:00:21 spirit msec: Disabling non local services 
Jan  7 07:00:21 spirit msec: appended in /etc/hosts.deny the line: 
Jan  7 07:00:21 spirit msec: ALL:ALL EXCEPT 127.0.0.1:DENY 
 
fam is registered and portmap is running : 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# rpcinfo -p localhost 
   program vers proto   port 
102   tcp111  portmapper 
102   udp111  portmapper 
3910022   tcp  42967  sgi_fam 
 
BUT programs cannot use fam since in the syslog we see : 
Jan  7 07:13:09 spirit xinetd[23147]: warning: can't get client address: Transport 
endpoint is not 
connected 
Jan  7 07:13:09 spirit xinetd[23147]: libwrap refused connection to sgi_fam from  
Jan  7 07:13:09 spirit xinetd[23148]: warning: can't get client address: Transport 
endpoint is not 
connected 
Jan  7 07:13:09 spirit xinetd[23148]: libwrap refused connection to sgi_fam from  
Jan  7 07:13:09 spirit xinetd[23149]: warning: can't get client address: Transport 
endpoint is not 
connected 
Jan  7 07:13:09 spirit xinetd[23149]: libwrap refused connection to sgi_fam from  
Jan  7 07:13:09 spirit xinetd[23150]: warning: can't get client address: Transport 
endpoint is not 
connected 
Jan  7 07:13:09 spirit xinetd[23150]: libwrap refused connection to sgi_fam from  
Jan  7 07:13:09 spirit xinetd[23151]: warning: can't get client address: Transport 
endpoint is not 
connected 
Jan  7 07:13:09 spirit xinetd[23151]: libwrap refused connection to sgi_fam from  
Jan  7 07:13:09 spirit xinetd[23152]: warning: can't get client address: Transport 
endpoint is not 
connected 
Jan  7 07:13:09 spirit xinetd[23152]: libwrap refused connection to sgi_fam from  
Jan  7 07:13:09 spirit xinetd[23153]: warning: can't get client address: Transport 
endpoint is not 
connected 
Jan  7 07:13:09 spirit xinetd[23153]: libwrap refused connection to sgi_fam from  
Jan  7 07:13:09 spirit xinetd[23154]: warning: can't get client address: Transport 
endpoint is not 
connected 
Jan  7 07:13:09 spirit xinetd[23154]: libwrap refused connection to sgi_fam from  
Jan  7 07:13:09 spirit xinetd[23155]: warning: can't get client address: Transport 
endpoint is not 
connected 
Jan  7 07:13:09 spirit xinetd[23155]: libwrap refused connection to sgi_fam from  
Jan  7 07:13:09 spirit xinetd[23156]: warning: can't get client address: Transport 
endpoint is not 
connected 
Jan  7 07:13:09 spirit xinetd[23156]: libwrap refused connection to sgi_fam from  
Jan  7 07:13:09 spirit xinetd[23157]: warning: can't get client address: Transport 
endpoint is not 
connected 
Jan  7 07:13:09 spirit xinetd[23157]: libwrap refused connection to sgi_fam from  
Jan  7 07:13:09 spirit xinetd[23158]: warning: can't get client address: Transport 
endpoint is not 
connected 
Jan  7 07:13:09 spirit xinetd[23158]: libwrap refused connection to sgi_fam from  
Jan  7 07:13:09 spirit xinetd[23159]: warning: can't get client address: Transport 
endpoint is not 
connected 
Jan  7 07:13:09 spirit xinetd[23159]: libwrap refused connection to sgi_fam from  
Jan  7 07:13:09 spirit xinetd[23160]: warning: can't get client address: Transport 
endpoint is not 
connected 
Jan  7 07:13:09 spirit xinetd[23160]: libwrap refused connection to sgi_fam from  
Jan  7 07:13:09 spirit xinetd[23161]: warning: can't get client address: Transport 
endpoint is not 
connected 
Jan  7 07:13:09 spirit xinetd[23161]: libwrap refused connection to sgi_fam from  
Jan  7 07:13:09 spirit xinetd[23162]: warning: can't get client address: Transport 
endpoint is not 
connected 
Jan  7 07:13:09 spirit xinetd[23162]: libwrap refused connection to sgi_fam from  
Jan  7 07:13:09 spirit xinetd[23163]: warning: can't get client address: Transport 
endpoint is not 
connected 
Jan  7 07:13:09 spirit xinetd[23163]: libwrap refused connection to sgi_fam from  
Jan  7 07:13:09 spirit xinetd[23164]: warning: can't get client address: Transport 
endpoint is not 
connected 
Jan  7 07:13:09 spirit xinetd[23164]: libwrap refused connection to sgi_fam from  
Jan  7 07:13:09 spirit xinetd[23165]: warning: can't get client address: Transport 
endpoint is not 
connected 
Jan  7 07:13:09 spirit xinetd[23165]: libwrap refused connection to sgi_fam from  
Jan  7 07:13:09 spirit xinetd[23166]: warning: can't get client address: Transport 
endpoint is not 
connected 
Jan  7 07:13:09 spirit xinetd[23166]: libwrap refused connection to sgi_fam from  
Jan  7 07:13:09 spirit xinetd[231

[Cooker] [Bug 2685] [drakxtools] Epson Perfection 1650 USB scanner not in scanner database

2003-03-25 Thread robert.pollak
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2685

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-03-25 22:42 ---
This is a duplicate of bug 2683.



--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



--- Reminder: ---
assigned_to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
status: UNCONFIRMED
creation_date: 
description: 
Release candidate 2

The scanner Epson 1650 is recognised in the Mandrake Control Center. However, trying 
to install says that the driver/scanner is not in the databse.
Starting XSane gives the message: no drivers available
The Sane website list this scanner as supported



[Cooker] Typo on 9.1 download page

2003-03-25 Thread Elijah P Newren
Hi,

I'm sorry if this is the wrong place to email this (I'm not a member of
the list), but I wasn't sure where to send this info.  I thought that
either this email list would be the right place, or someone on this list
could send it on to the right place for me.

Anyway, at
  http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/ftp.php3#iso

the md5 checksum section has an error.  It lists
   Mandrake91-cd2-exte.i586.iso
instead of
   Mandrake91-cd2-ext.i586.iso

(note the extra e after ext).  That gave me a slight scare when running
diff on the md5sums from what I downloaded and the md5sums from that
webpage.  (Also, there was another problem.  md5sum *.iso apparently
places two spaces between the md5sum and the filename, so it might be
advantageous to stick in some extra spaces on the webpage for simpler
cutting, pasting, and diff'ing)


Hope this helps,
Elijah

-- 
-
Elijah Newren
Internet: http://www.math.utah.edu/~newren   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tired of pop-up webpages when surfing the internet?  Look at
   http://www.math.utah.edu/~newren/noPopUps.html
for how to get rid of them without spending a penny.
-



[Cooker] [Bug 2855] [drakxtools] scanner drake does not allow manual addition of scanner

2003-03-25 Thread robert.pollak
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2855

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-03-25 22:38 ---
I see this with 9.1 rc2.
(I have no scanner installed and just wanted to look at the list of supported
scanners before buying one, since the list of
http://www.linux-mandrake.com/de/fhard.php3 is not up to date.)



--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



--- Reminder: ---
assigned_to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
status: UNCONFIRMED
creation_date: 
description: 
1. bring up the mandrake control center.
2. select hardware.
3. select scanner.
4. Scanner drake searches for scanner and then I get message "is not in the
database, configure it manually?" I select Yes and scanner drake exits back to
the hardware dialog box of the mandrake control center.



Re: [Cooker] RC3, 3 CD's over 650MB??

2003-03-25 Thread andre
On Monday 24 March 2003 21:51, Jason Greenwood wrote:
> Didn't Mandrake decide to keep the ISO's under 650MB??
>
> Cheers
>
> Jason
Talking about 650MB ISO's. What is the decision for hamer and itanic. Will 
they also have 650 ISO's or 700 ISO's. I think 700 ISO would be normal for 
them



Re: [Cooker] 9.1 iso hit the mirrors at last. Just downloaded the 3 CD set

2003-03-25 Thread jokerman64
On Tuesday 25 March 2003 2:14 pm, Lea Gris wrote:
> 9.1 iso hit the mirrors at last.
>
> I just downloaded the 3 CD set.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] iso]$ ll
> total 1999064
> -rw---1 lea  lea  682164224 mar 24 14:17
> Mandrake91-cd1-inst.i586.iso
> -rw---1 lea  lea  681279488 mar 24 14:19
> Mandrake91-cd2-ext.i586.iso
> -rw---1 lea  lea  681574400 mar 24 14:22
> Mandrake91-cd3-i18n.i586.iso
> -rw---1 lea  lea   188 mar 25 19:57 md5sums.91
> -rw---1 lea  lea  2050 mai 11  2001 README
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] iso]$ ncftp
> ftp://ftp-stud.fht-esslingen.de/pub/Mirrors/Mandrake/iso/
>
> ncftp /pub/.2/Mandrake/iso > mget *
> Mandrake91-cd2-ext.i586.iso:   649,72 MB3,20
> MB/s
> Mandrake91-cd3-i18n.i586.iso:  650,00 MB3,42
> MB/s
> README:  2,00 kB  119,46
> kB/s
> md5sums.90:188,00 B  164,07
> kB/s
>
> Had to get MD5 sums from mandrakelinux.com web site though ant put them
> in an md5sums.91 file because it wasn't on FTP mirror.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] iso]$ cat md5sums.91
> 6f1581974e12420fef87868ed6caa31f  Mandrake91-cd1-inst.i586.iso
> 87afe11ddef6b619866322aa0797e45f  Mandrake91-cd2-ext.i586.iso
> ff187c7a552722f42790b5726fdb62b3  Mandrake91-cd3-i18n.i586.iso
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] iso]$ md5sum -c md5sums.91
> Mandrake91-cd1-inst.i586.iso: OK
> Mandrake91-cd2-ext.i586.iso: OK
> Mandrake91-cd3-i18n.i586.iso: OK
>
> I'will try this tonight.
>
> Thank for the great job from developpers and testers.
>
> Regards.
rsyncing rc3 from secsup as I write. hope I don't see kfmclient errors once I 
upgrade
-- 
A bird in hand is less painful than two in the bush.



Re: [Cooker] 9.1 iso hit the mirrors at last. Just downloaded the3 CD set

2003-03-25 Thread Helge Hielscher
Lea Gris wrote:

9.1 iso hit the mirrors at last. 
The ISO-images are also shared in file exchange networks, like edonkey, 
gnutella or directconnect.

The edonkey/mldonkey links are:
ed2k://|file|Mandrake91-cd1-inst.i586.iso|682164224|7422d9374a1bd9187254de638f47c7d3| 
 

ed2k://|file|Mandrake91-cd2-ext.i586.iso|681279488|9bc5687f06ecf26e1f767623dc8f6421| 
 

ed2k://|file|Mandrake91-cd3-i18n.i586.iso|681574400|82530029d63b3624020fcc40aa9ad625| 


To spread the load it might be a good idea to participate in file sharing.

Regards,
Helge Hielscher





[Cooker] 9.1 iso hit the mirrors at last. Just downloaded the 3 CD set

2003-03-25 Thread Lea Gris
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
9.1 iso hit the mirrors at last.

I just downloaded the 3 CD set.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] iso]$ ll
total 1999064
- -rw---1 lea  lea  682164224 mar 24 14:17
Mandrake91-cd1-inst.i586.iso
- -rw---1 lea  lea  681279488 mar 24 14:19
Mandrake91-cd2-ext.i586.iso
- -rw---1 lea  lea  681574400 mar 24 14:22
Mandrake91-cd3-i18n.i586.iso
- -rw---1 lea  lea   188 mar 25 19:57 md5sums.91
- -rw---1 lea  lea  2050 mai 11  2001 README
[EMAIL PROTECTED] iso]$ ncftp
ftp://ftp-stud.fht-esslingen.de/pub/Mirrors/Mandrake/iso/
ncftp /pub/.2/Mandrake/iso > mget *
Mandrake91-cd2-ext.i586.iso:   649,72 MB3,20
MB/s
Mandrake91-cd3-i18n.i586.iso:  650,00 MB3,42
MB/s
README:  2,00 kB  119,46
kB/s
md5sums.90:188,00 B  164,07 kB/s
Had to get MD5 sums from mandrakelinux.com web site though ant put them
in an md5sums.91 file because it wasn't on FTP mirror.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] iso]$ cat md5sums.91
6f1581974e12420fef87868ed6caa31f  Mandrake91-cd1-inst.i586.iso
87afe11ddef6b619866322aa0797e45f  Mandrake91-cd2-ext.i586.iso
ff187c7a552722f42790b5726fdb62b3  Mandrake91-cd3-i18n.i586.iso
[EMAIL PROTECTED] iso]$ md5sum -c md5sums.91
Mandrake91-cd1-inst.i586.iso: OK
Mandrake91-cd2-ext.i586.iso: OK
Mandrake91-cd3-i18n.i586.iso: OK
I'will try this tonight.

Thank for the great job from developpers and testers.

Regards.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+gKqOiNTO/wgn58kRAuxUAKDKpTWmr75NlNyazUlByT957ffLoACeIX/6
lqI179Mq8xiM3yrG9gguSno=
=Pd0k
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



[Cooker] [Bug 3231] [Installation] Installation fails on IBM 300PL

2003-03-25 Thread drfickle
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3231





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-03-25 20:13 ---
I can confirm that this is a FTP-only bug. Using the RC3 (aka final) ISOs, the
installation works.



--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



--- Reminder: ---
assigned_to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
status: UNCONFIRMED
creation_date: 
description: 
I have an IBM 300PL (PIII-450 MHz) with a S3 Trio3D video chipset. As soon as it
enters the second stage of the install it dies with the message:

Error using auto_install
SCALAR(0x88d26bc)
error :(

Is there a log somewhere I can send? /root doesn't even exist at this point so I
can't grab the normal log.



[Cooker] [Bug 3473] [perl-ldap] missing perl-ASN1-Convert Requires

2003-03-25 Thread drfickle
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3473





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-03-25 20:12 ---
I think I mixed the package name up. It should be perl-Convert-ASN1, not
perl-ASN1-Convert.



--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



--- Reminder: ---
assigned_to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
status: UNCONFIRMED
creation_date: 
description: 
perl-ldap requires perl-ASN1-Convert but does not have that dependency set.
Also, perl-ASN1-Convert is in contribs, but perl-ldap is in main. I would
propose that the Requires be added to perl-ldap. Also that either
perl-ASN1-Convert be added to main or perl-ldap be moved to contrib.

Thanks.



Re: [Cooker] urpmi features

2003-03-25 Thread Benjamin Pflugmann
On Tue 2003-03-25 at 10:24:23 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
> > Of course, doing it all in a nicely scrolling Konsole window works fine for 
> > me, here, but if we are going to have a GUI, we might as well make it a 
> > decently functional one, usable by power users as well as newbies, and 
> > continuing to support new back-end options, even without new versions of the 
> > GUI every time the back-end changes.
> 
> One request for the gui here... a select all updates button. when doing
> a new install 3 months after release it can be real time consuming to
> check each and every update one by one by one by one  (you get the
> idea) 

I am not sure if you are talking about rpmdrake, but if you do, you
can simply click on the checkbox right of the "> Upgradable" headline
(well, after selecting "all packages by update availability", of
course).

HTH,

Benjamin.



pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Cooker] installing makedev loops

2003-03-25 Thread Alan Schmitt
Hello,

I wanted to install recent coreutils (in case it might solve some
strange things with latest urpmi have weird option for cp when doing
urpmi.update -a), but to do that I needed to upgrade makedev. When I
urpmi it (or rpm the cache), it gets stuck in the "preparing" stage,
taking 100 % cpu. I tried to strace it, and it seems to be looping: I
get a lot of:

stat64("/dev/cciss", 0xbfffe060)= -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
stat64("/dev/ida", 0xbfffe060)  = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
stat64("/dev/cciss", 0xbfffe060)= -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
stat64("/dev/ida", 0xbfffe060)  = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
stat64("/dev/cciss", 0xbfffe060)= -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
stat64("/dev/ida", 0xbfffe060)  = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
stat64("/dev/cciss", 0xbfffe060)= -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
stat64("/dev/ida", 0xbfffe060)  = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
stat64("/dev/cciss", 0xbfffe060)= -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
stat64("/dev/ida", 0xbfffe060)  = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
stat64("/dev/cciss", 0xbfffe060)= -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
stat64("/dev/ida", 0xbfffe060)  = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
stat64("/dev/cciss", 0xbfffe060)= -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
stat64("/dev/ida", 0xbfffe060)  = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
stat64("/dev/cciss", 0xbfffe060)= -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
stat64("/dev/ida", 0xbfffe060)  = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
stat64("/dev/cciss", 0xbfffe060)= -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
stat64("/dev/ida", 0xbfffe060)  = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
stat64("/dev/cciss", 0xbfffe060)= -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)

Am I doing something wrong ? Should I not try to install makedev ? Or is
this a bug ?

Thanks,

Alan Schmitt

PS: please CC me as I am not subscribed to the list.

-- 
The hacker: someone who figured things out and made something cool happen.



[Cooker] [Bug 1471] [kdebase] Clicking on Removable media produces "KDEInit could not launch 'kfmclient'" error message.

2003-03-25 Thread spluess
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-03-25 19:53 ---
Bug still persists  when creating a new directory on the desktop and opening the 
trash. 



--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



--- Reminder: ---
assigned_to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
status: RESOLVED
creation_date: 
description: 
Clicking on Removable media produces "KDEInit could not launch 'kfmclient'" 
error message. 
 
Also Supermount not working however issuing "supermount -i enable" fixes 
problem of supermount on reboot.  Error message continues but CD may be 
accessed via /mnt/cdrom in shell or normal window.



Re: [Cooker] 9.1final == 9.1rc3

2003-03-25 Thread Benjamin Pflugmann
Hi.

On Tue 2003-03-25 at 15:13:46 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I agree!
> I hate to say it - but someone from Mandrake really should make this clear.

Well, they do this for a purpose and announcing it would defeat that
purpose, wouldn't it?

> I'm also d/loading them and wonder what I'll find, when I install!

Jupp. Why worry at all? If they really had chosen to release a RC3,
wouldn't it be a good idea to download it for final round of testing?
So why worry, just download it. Everyone will find out soon enough.

Bye,

Benjamin.


PS: Already installed it and yet have to find something that doesn't
work for me. Kudos to the Mandrake Team!

> I'm currently downloading 9.1rc3...
> Is it the same as final release ? I mean, is it just renamed ISOs of final
> release ?


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Cooker] [Bug 768] [kdebase] knoqueror crash when accessing /mnt

2003-03-25 Thread 111mandrake
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-03-25 19:42 ---
On a fresh install of 9.1RC3

Opening home in KDE, clicking on /mnt in the folders tree on the left, watching
KDE hang. impossible to close. Xkill takes forever

All this on a Dell Latitude CSx with a Intel Mobile 440 BX PCIset



--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



--- Reminder: ---
assigned_to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
status: RESOLVED
creation_date: 
description: 
Config: 2 CD-ROM using supermount and the kernel of beta 1
when clicking on /mnt in knoqueror it freezes.
This seems not to be kernel related as I can access /mnt and subdirectory in 
the CL mode



Re: [Cooker] Mandrake 9.1 rc3?????

2003-03-25 Thread Ingo Bauer

It seems to be the same trick . Just finished the download.

On Mon, 24 Mar 2003, andre wrote:

> On Monday 24 March 2003 19:48, Francisco Alcaraz Ariza wrote:
> > Some of the servers are downloading new files instead of the rc2 and, at
> > the moment, they are named rc3!!!
> >
> > Is a rc3 comming???
> >
> > Regards
>
> Didn't they use this trick with 9.0. Wasn't rc3==9.0gold
>




Re: [Cooker] urpmi features

2003-03-25 Thread James Sparenberg
On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 04:08, Duncan wrote:
> On Tue 25 Mar 2003 03:05, Guillaume Rousse posted as excerpted below:
> > Ainsi parlait eddie :
> > > 
> > > 
> >
> > Please use standard text for email.
> 
> No kidding!
> 
> > > Then you should talk to Texstar @ Pclinuxonline. He had a great system
> > > with apt-get and Synaptic that worked with a Gui and worked wonderful,
> > > although he doesn't have the time to maintain two update mirrors. If
> > > one guy can maintain a program like that, why can't Mandrake?
> >
> > Nobody told this wasn't possible. Just that isn't a priority. Developping
> > GUI is heavy and costly, especially compared to adding a switch in CLI. If
> > you want advanced options, you're supposed to be an advanced user, meaning
> > able to read the doc and a shell prompt...
> 
> What I'd like to see is a solution I've seen elsewhere..
> 
> 1)  After adding any usual GUI-ified options as thought appropriate, have a 
> text box (or a page of text boxes for a multi-function app that calls 
> multiple other tools and/or calls a single tool in multiple contexts) where 
> the user can add additional command line switches and params as so desired.  
> The only support needed is to provide the text boxes, one per context, and 
> ensure that their contents gets passed when the specified tool is called 
> within that specified context.
> 
> One example of the above that I've been working with lately is K3B, the KDE 
> CD/DVD image burning software front-end to the various ripping/burning/isofs 
> tools.  In it's prefs dialog, it has an entire page/tab listing the various 
> back end tools, with a text box beside each, in which you can add advanced 
> switches as appropriate.  Those that don't know about the additional switches 
> and/or don't want/need to bother with them  (like me, for the most part) can 
> just leave them blank, but the several of the back end tools it invokes have 
> all sorts of corner-case command line options unneeded by most folks, and 
> having those text boxes, for additional switches to be added at invocation, 
> means a lot of folks can use the GUI, that would otherwise have to use the 
> command line, or a different front end that provided such options.
> 
> 2)  A (perhaps optional) popup, that lists the progress details and any 
> errors, as the process progresses.  One of the big reasons (besides the lack 
> of advanced options in the GUI) I use URPMI rather than the various GUI 
> utils, is that the command line version lists the stuff as it downloads, and 
> I can see where something stalls, if it does.  When I'm updating multiple 
> source lists, and I see the internet activity stop for to long a time, 
> without returning a success or failure dialog, on the graphical tools, I have 
> no way of knowing where the hold-up is.  With the command line, I can 
> immediately see what mirror isn't responding, or whatever other problem may 
> be occuring.  In addition, I like seeing the scrolling status, as the 
> individual components are d/led.  A popup window with the same info scrolled 
> in its display on the GUI version would be very nice...
> 
> An example of this is what KPackage does, when installing an RPM.  It pops up 
> a status window, with the various commands and results as they would normally 
> be output on the command line, if one were to invoke rpm from there.  Now, in 
> KPackage, it isn't normally such a big deal, because the process isn't so 
> long, with so many steps, as a multi-mirror update, and then an urpmi 
> --auto-select is, but giving GURPMI or Software Installer or whatever the 
> graphical title of the month is now, the same sort of update progress window, 
> would be very useful.  (The optional part of it could be handled with a 
> simple checkbox, either as a global option in some settings dialog, or on a 
> per-task basis, right before clicking the "go" button.)
> 
> Of course, doing it all in a nicely scrolling Konsole window works fine for 
> me, here, but if we are going to have a GUI, we might as well make it a 
> decently functional one, usable by power users as well as newbies, and 
> continuing to support new back-end options, even without new versions of the 
> GUI every time the back-end changes.

One request for the gui here... a select all updates button. when doing
a new install 3 months after release it can be real time consuming to
check each and every update one by one by one by one  (you get the
idea) 

James





[Cooker] [Bug 3534] [kdebase] New: KDE window streaked on laptop

2003-03-25 Thread 111mandrake
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3534

   Product: kdebase
 Component: kdebase
   Summary: KDE window streaked on laptop
   Version: 3.1-83mdk
  Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: critical
  Priority: P2
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Booting from a Dell Latitude CSx with a NeoMagic MagicMedia 256 ZX graphic chipset

The top of every window in KDE is kind of scrambled. There are lots of vertical
streaks. The logout trick does nothing.

Note:This does not happen with Gnome



--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



[Cooker] [Bug 3152] [mozilla] Fonts

2003-03-25 Thread ghibo
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3152

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEEDINFO|UNCONFIRMED



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-03-25 19:28 ---
Sorry but are you referring to the missed line of pixel in
text? If so, it should be bug #198675 in bugzilla/mozilla. I noticed that
also in 1.2.1.



--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



--- Reminder: ---
assigned_to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
status: UNCONFIRMED
creation_date: 
description: 
Fonts look good on most sites, but on some sites like cnn.com, c/net.com and
uk.yahoo.com news, the tops are missing on several characters which make it
difficult to read.



[Cooker] [Bug 3458] [Installation] mdk91.rc2 : dd if=./images/hd.img of=/dev/fd0 erase hd.img!!

2003-03-25 Thread tateopfr
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3458





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-03-25 19:20 ---
At first I supposed my mistake
then I try with a second file and it happen again
with the right sintax
dd if=hd.img of=/dev/fd0


On Tuesday 25 March 2003 12:20 pm, gc wrote:




--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



--- Reminder: ---
assigned_to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
status: UNCONFIRMED
creation_date: 
description: 
My system hang ( compaq presario 705EA ) and It's not possible to start 
the system ask me root password to go in repair mode 
I enter as root 
I mount a clean partition where is a copy of  all  mdk91.rc2 files 
I want to reinstall everything 
dd if=/mnt/images/hd.img of=/dev/fd0 
does not do anything 
and my hd.img now as 0 bytes size



[Cooker] [Bug 2928] [kdebase] Wrong title of Help center

2003-03-25 Thread kde
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2928

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution||WONTFIX



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-03-25 19:07 ---
 Send a bug report to bugs.kde.org 
Problem with kde french team translation 
Regards 



--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



--- Reminder: ---
assigned_to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
status: RESOLVED
creation_date: 
description: 
RC2 - French

Manule de l'utilisateur
isntead of
Manuel de l'utilisateur



Re: [Cooker] Is 9.1 finished?

2003-03-25 Thread Thorsten von Plotho-Kettner
Am Dienstag, 25. März 2003 11:54 schrieb Guillaume Cottenceau:
> John Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > First modifications on Cooker seem to come to a halt,
> > indicating that 9.1 is finished; then it appears that an RC3
> > has been released, and now my overnight rsync has produced an
> > updates/9.1 directory.
> >
> > What is the official position?
>
> We are about to announce the 9.1.

March 25th, 2003 - Mandrake Linux 9.1 (Bamboo) is available! - We 
are very proud to bring you this exceptional release of Mandrake 
Linux. It's beautiful, fast, more powerful than ever. We hope 
you're going to love it as much as we loved to build it. A press 
release about this new release is available here. You can discover 
all Mandrake 9.1 features and what it looks like on this page, 
download it here. Don't delay to pre-order your pack, be among the 
first to receive a full Mandrake 9.1 box! Subscribe to the club and 
get many benefits such as an extended list of FTP mirrors and 
rebates on 9.1 pre-orders! [www.mandrake.com]


-- 
Thorsten von Plotho-Kettner Fon/SMS 0163-2886981
Linuxuser  #275535   -   Linux Machine   #168717
Freie Autoren schreiben:  http://www.aus-satz.de
Freie Texte im Netz: http://aussatz.antville.org

   



[Cooker] [Bug 1627] [initscripts] Initscripts does not initialize-configure eth1 while Drakeconnect does it

2003-03-25 Thread pidoux
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1627

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEEDINFO|UNCONFIRMED



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-03-25 18:30 ---
flepied wrote:


Please find attached the requested files.

I hope it can help.



Dr Bernard Pidoux
Federation de Neurophysiologie Clinique
Groupe Hospitalier Pitie-Salpetriere - Paris.
tel faculte +33(0)140 77 97 76 ou via ligne hopital 82 ~ 9776
Site Laboratoire http://www.physio.chups.jussieu.fr/

DEVICE=eth0
BOOTPROTO=static
IPADDR=134.157.199.230
NETMASK=255.255.255.224
NETWORK=134.157.199.224
BROADCAST=134.157.199.255
ONBOOT=yes
DEVICE=eth1
BOOTPROTO=static
IPADDR=192.168.1.1
NETMASK=255.255.255.0
NETWORK=192.168.1.0
BROADCAST=192.168.1.255
ONBOOT=yes
Mar 25 18:00:18 synapse exiting on signal 15
Mar 25 18:02:59 synapse syslogd 1.4.1: restart.
Mar 25 18:03:00 synapse kernel: klogd 1.4.1, log source = /proc/kmsg started.
Mar 25 18:03:00 synapse kernel: Inspecting /boot/System.map-2.4.21-0.13mdk
Mar 25 18:03:00 synapse partmon: Checking if partitions have enough free diskspace:
Mar 25 18:03:00 synapse kernel: Loaded 19672 symbols from 
/boot/System.map-2.4.21-0.13mdk.
Mar 25 18:03:00 synapse kernel: Symbols match kernel version 2.4.21.
Mar 25 18:03:00 synapse kernel: Loaded 345 symbols from 15 modules.
Mar 25 18:03:00 synapse kernel: Linux version 2.4.21-0.13mdk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc 
version 3.2.2 (Mandrake Linux 9.1 3.2.2-3mdk)) #1 Fri Mar 7 06:31:12 CET 2003
Mar 25 18:03:00 synapse kernel: BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
Mar 25 18:03:00 synapse kernel:  BIOS-e820:  - 0009fc00 
(usable)
Mar 25 18:03:00 synapse kernel:  BIOS-e820: 0009fc00 - 000a 
(reserved)
Mar 25 18:03:00 synapse kernel:  BIOS-e820: 000f - 0010 
(reserved)
Mar 25 18:03:00 synapse kernel:  BIOS-e820: 0010 - 0fffc000 
(usable)
Mar 25 18:03:00 synapse kernel:  BIOS-e820: 0fffc000 - 0000 (ACPI 
data)
Mar 25 18:03:00 synapse kernel:  BIOS-e820: 0000 - 1000 (ACPI 
NVS)
Mar 25 18:03:00 synapse kernel:  BIOS-e820:  - 0001 
(reserved)
Mar 25 18:03:00 synapse kernel: 255MB LOWMEM available.
Mar 25 18:03:00 synapse kernel: ACPI: have wakeup address 0xc0001000
Mar 25 18:03:00 synapse kernel: On node 0 totalpages: 65532
Mar 25 18:03:00 synapse kernel: zone(0): 4096 pages.
Mar 25 18:03:00 synapse kernel: zone(1): 61436 pages.
Mar 25 18:03:00 synapse kernel: zone(2): 0 pages.
Mar 25 18:03:00 synapse kernel: ACPI: RSDP (v000 ASUS   ) @ 
0x000f5a60
Mar 25 18:03:00 synapse kernel: ACPI: RSDT (v001 ASUS   P3B_F12336.12337) @ 
0x0fffc000
Mar 25 18:03:00 synapse kernel: ACPI: FADT (v001 ASUS   P3B_F12336.12337) @ 
0x0fffc080
Mar 25 18:03:00 synapse kernel: ACPI: BOOT (v001 ASUS   P3B_F12336.12337) @ 
0x0fffc040
Mar 25 18:03:00 synapse kernel: ACPI: DSDT (v001   ASUS P3B_F0.04096) @ 
0x
Mar 25 18:03:00 synapse kernel: ACPI: BIOS passes blacklist
Mar 25 18:03:00 synapse kernel: ACPI: MADT not present
Mar 25 18:03:00 synapse kernel: Kernel command line: BOOT_IMAGE=2421-13 ro root=301 
devfs=mount hdd=ide-scsi quiet
Mar 25 18:03:00 synapse kernel: ide_setup: hdd=ide-scsi
Mar 25 18:03:00 synapse kernel: Local APIC disabled by BIOS -- reenabling.
Mar 25 18:03:00 synapse kernel: Found and enabled local APIC!
Mar 25 18:03:00 synapse kernel: Initializing CPU#0
Mar 25 18:03:00 synapse kernel: Detected 451.026 MHz processor.
Mar 25 18:03:00 synapse kernel: Console: colour dummy device 80x25
Mar 25 18:03:00 synapse kernel: Calibrating delay loop... 897.84 BogoMIPS
Mar 25 18:03:00 synapse kernel: Memory: 255824k/262128k available (1410k kernel code, 
5916k reserved, 1118k data, 136k init, 0k highmem)
Mar 25 18:03:00 synapse kernel: Dentry cache hash table entries: 32768 (order: 6, 
262144 bytes)
Mar 25 18:03:00 synapse kernel: Inode cache hash table entries: 16384 (order: 5, 
131072 bytes)
Mar 25 18:03:00 synapse kernel: Mount cache hash table entries: 512 (order: 0, 4096 
bytes)
Mar 25 18:03:00 synapse kernel: Buffer-cache hash table entries: 16384 (order: 4, 
65536 bytes)
Mar 25 18:03:00 synapse kernel: Page-cache hash table entries: 65536 (order: 6, 262144 
bytes)
Mar 25 18:03:00 synapse kernel: CPU: L1 I cache: 16K, L1 D cache: 16K
Mar 25 18:03:00 synapse kernel: CPU: L2 cache: 512K
Mar 25 18:03:00 synapse kernel: Intel machine check architecture supported.
Mar 25 18:03:00 synapse kernel: Intel machine check reporting enabled on CPU#0.
Mar 25 18:03:00 synapse kernel: CPU: After generic, caps: 0383fbff  
 
Mar 25 18:03:00 synapse kernel: CPU: Common caps: 0383fbff  
 
Mar 25 18:03:00 synapse kernel: CPU: Intel Pentium III (Katmai) stepping 03
Mar 25 

RE: [Cooker] 9.1final == 9.1rc3

2003-03-25 Thread Ribeiro Fernando
Oups!
Sorry for the read receipt request



-Original Message-
From: Ribeiro Fernando 
Sent: terça-feira, 25 de Março de 2003 18:03
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [Cooker] 9.1final == 9.1rc3

ftp://sunsite.uio.no/linux/Mandrake/Mandrake/iso/:
03/24/2003 01:17682,164,224 Mandrake91-cd1-inst.i586.iso
03/24/2003 01:19681,279,488 Mandrake91-cd2-ext.i586.iso
03/24/2003 01:22681,574,400 Mandrake91-cd3-i18n.i586.iso
05/11/2001 12:00  2,050 README


-Original Message-
From: Vlastimil Holer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: terça-feira, 25 de Março de 2003 17:35
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Cooker] 9.1final == 9.1rc3

On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 03:13:46PM -, Mike Diack wrote:
| I agree!
| I hate to say it - but someone from Mandrake really should make this
clear.

We received this mail right now:
--

Dear Mandrake Mirror,

If you don't have any time just leave this message.
The mirroring will be done automatically.

The new Mandrake 9.1 is available now.

It's would be great if you could speed up the availability of the 9.1 isos.

In order to make the ISO available now you just need to copy the rc3 from
+Mandrake-iso directory to Mandrake/iso:

cp -a Mandrake-iso/i586/MandrakeLinux-9.1-rc3-CD1.i586.iso
+Mandrake/iso/Mandrake91-cd1-inst.i586.iso

cp -a Mandrake-iso/i586/MandrakeLinux-9.1-rc3-CD2.i586.iso
+Mandrake/iso/Mandrake91-cd2-ext.i586.iso

cp -a Mandrake-iso/i586/MandrakeLinux-9.1-rc3-CD3.i586.iso
+Mandrake/iso/Mandrake91-cd3-i18n.i586.iso

Thank you!

Jacques


 Faculty of Informatics e-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Masaryk University Brnowww: www.fi.muni.cz/~xholer
 Czech Republic   




[Cooker] [Bug 3533] [gdm] New: gdm and configuration refresh

2003-03-25 Thread qateam
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3533

   Product: gdm
 Component: program
   Summary: gdm and configuration refresh
   Version: 2.4.1.3-5mdk
  Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Run gdm, click on system, then close the system window.
The window do not close properly, it is not refreshed.



--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



[Cooker] [Bug 3152] [mozilla] Fonts

2003-03-25 Thread fcrozat
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3152





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-03-25 17:33 ---
Could you try removing your Windows fonts (ie using only fonts provided by
MandrakeSoft) ?





--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



--- Reminder: ---
assigned_to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
status: NEEDINFO
creation_date: 
description: 
Fonts look good on most sites, but on some sites like cnn.com, c/net.com and
uk.yahoo.com news, the tops are missing on several characters which make it
difficult to read.



RE: [Cooker] 9.1final == 9.1rc3

2003-03-25 Thread Ribeiro Fernando
ftp://sunsite.uio.no/linux/Mandrake/Mandrake/iso/:
03/24/2003 01:17682,164,224 Mandrake91-cd1-inst.i586.iso
03/24/2003 01:19681,279,488 Mandrake91-cd2-ext.i586.iso
03/24/2003 01:22681,574,400 Mandrake91-cd3-i18n.i586.iso
05/11/2001 12:00  2,050 README


-Original Message-
From: Vlastimil Holer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: terça-feira, 25 de Março de 2003 17:35
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Cooker] 9.1final == 9.1rc3

On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 03:13:46PM -, Mike Diack wrote:
| I agree!
| I hate to say it - but someone from Mandrake really should make this
clear.

We received this mail right now:
--

Dear Mandrake Mirror,

If you don't have any time just leave this message.
The mirroring will be done automatically.

The new Mandrake 9.1 is available now.

It's would be great if you could speed up the availability of the 9.1 isos.

In order to make the ISO available now you just need to copy the rc3 from
+Mandrake-iso directory to Mandrake/iso:

cp -a Mandrake-iso/i586/MandrakeLinux-9.1-rc3-CD1.i586.iso
+Mandrake/iso/Mandrake91-cd1-inst.i586.iso

cp -a Mandrake-iso/i586/MandrakeLinux-9.1-rc3-CD2.i586.iso
+Mandrake/iso/Mandrake91-cd2-ext.i586.iso

cp -a Mandrake-iso/i586/MandrakeLinux-9.1-rc3-CD3.i586.iso
+Mandrake/iso/Mandrake91-cd3-i18n.i586.iso

Thank you!

Jacques


 Faculty of Informatics e-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Masaryk University Brnowww: www.fi.muni.cz/~xholer
 Czech Republic




Re: [Cooker] where is xev gone?

2003-03-25 Thread Pascal Terjan
Bernd Niederberger wrote:
Hi everybody,

I 've installed Mandrake 9.1-rc3 and I am missing xev.
Has anybody an idea where it is?
Looks like X11R6-contrib is not on CDs. You can get it from a cooker mirror.




Re: [Cooker] 9.1final == 9.1rc3

2003-03-25 Thread Mike Diack
Thanks for clarifying
- Original Message -
From: "Vlastimil Holer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 4:35 PM
Subject: Re: [Cooker] 9.1final == 9.1rc3


> On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 03:13:46PM -, Mike Diack wrote:
> | I agree!
> | I hate to say it - but someone from Mandrake really should make this
clear.
>
> We received this mail right now:
> --
>
> Dear Mandrake Mirror,
>
> If you don't have any time just leave this message.
> The mirroring will be done automatically.
>
> The new Mandrake 9.1 is available now.
>
> It's would be great if you could speed up the availability of the 9.1
isos.
>
> In order to make the ISO available now you just need to copy the rc3 from
> +Mandrake-iso directory to Mandrake/iso:
>
> cp -a Mandrake-iso/i586/MandrakeLinux-9.1-rc3-CD1.i586.iso
> +Mandrake/iso/Mandrake91-cd1-inst.i586.iso
>
> cp -a Mandrake-iso/i586/MandrakeLinux-9.1-rc3-CD2.i586.iso
> +Mandrake/iso/Mandrake91-cd2-ext.i586.iso
>
> cp -a Mandrake-iso/i586/MandrakeLinux-9.1-rc3-CD3.i586.iso
> +Mandrake/iso/Mandrake91-cd3-i18n.i586.iso
>
> Thank you!
>
> Jacques
>
> 
>  Faculty of Informatics e-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  Masaryk University Brnowww: www.fi.muni.cz/~xholer
>  Czech Republic
> 
>
>



[Cooker] [Bug 3152] [mozilla] Fonts

2003-03-25 Thread d97mabo
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3152





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-03-25 17:54 ---
Created an attachment (id=396)
 --> (http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/attachment.cgi?id=396&action=view)
another screenshot

The problem is still present, to a lesser degree maybe but still there.



--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



--- Reminder: ---
assigned_to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
status: NEEDINFO
creation_date: 
description: 
Fonts look good on most sites, but on some sites like cnn.com, c/net.com and
uk.yahoo.com news, the tops are missing on several characters which make it
difficult to read.



Re: [Cooker] 9.1final == 9.1rc3

2003-03-25 Thread Vlastimil Holer
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 03:13:46PM -, Mike Diack wrote:
| I agree!
| I hate to say it - but someone from Mandrake really should make this clear.

We received this mail right now:
--

Dear Mandrake Mirror,

If you don't have any time just leave this message.
The mirroring will be done automatically.

The new Mandrake 9.1 is available now.

It's would be great if you could speed up the availability of the 9.1 isos.

In order to make the ISO available now you just need to copy the rc3 from
+Mandrake-iso directory to Mandrake/iso:

cp -a Mandrake-iso/i586/MandrakeLinux-9.1-rc3-CD1.i586.iso
+Mandrake/iso/Mandrake91-cd1-inst.i586.iso

cp -a Mandrake-iso/i586/MandrakeLinux-9.1-rc3-CD2.i586.iso
+Mandrake/iso/Mandrake91-cd2-ext.i586.iso

cp -a Mandrake-iso/i586/MandrakeLinux-9.1-rc3-CD3.i586.iso
+Mandrake/iso/Mandrake91-cd3-i18n.i586.iso

Thank you!

Jacques


 Faculty of Informatics e-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Masaryk University Brnowww: www.fi.muni.cz/~xholer
 Czech Republic 




[Cooker] where is xev gone?

2003-03-25 Thread Bernd Niederberger
Hi everybody,

I 've installed Mandrake 9.1-rc3 and I am missing xev.
Has anybody an idea where it is?

Regards
 Bernd



[Cooker] [Bug 3152] [mozilla] Fonts

2003-03-25 Thread d97mabo
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3152





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-03-25 17:06 ---
Created an attachment (id=395)
 --> (http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/attachment.cgi?id=395&action=view)
Roughly the same page in Gnome

Here is a screenshot from Gnome

I am using Mozilla-1.3-1mdk

With regard to the fonts.conf file, I have no such file not in ~ or /etc
Maybe because I imported the fonts manually from WindowsXP (due to the ntfs
problem present in rc2) using the instructions on XFree86:s site.



--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



--- Reminder: ---
assigned_to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
status: NEEDINFO
creation_date: 
description: 
Fonts look good on most sites, but on some sites like cnn.com, c/net.com and
uk.yahoo.com news, the tops are missing on several characters which make it
difficult to read.



[Cooker] [Bug 3532] [Bugzilla] New: i18n component showed as documentation

2003-03-25 Thread reinout
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3532

   Product: Bugzilla
 Component: Bugzilla
   Summary: i18n component showed as documentation
   Version: 2.17
  Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: minor
  Priority: P2
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Bug 2769 was reported with component 'i18n' but shows component 'documentation'
instead. I tried to change this again but Bugzilla keeps showing the wrong
component.

Expected:

The correct component is shown in the bug summary page.



--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



[Cooker] [Bug 2769] [mdkkdm] mdkkdm only partly localized

2003-03-25 Thread reinout
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2769





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-03-25 16:41 ---
wrong component...



--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



--- Reminder: ---
assigned_to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
status: NEW
creation_date: 
description: 
Posting this as a bug for lack of any official reaction on cooker-i18n :-(

See URL for problem description - mdkkdm apparently isn't localized in a number
of languages. The translators would like to correct this but the gettext
catalogs for mdkkdm are nowhere to be found. 

Releasing 9.1 with a halfway localized default desktop manager would not only
look bad but would also devaluate all the hard work of the volunteer translators.



Re: [Cooker] Important remaining bugs

2003-03-25 Thread Reinout van Schouwen
Hello Daouda,

> AFAIR, i received mail from some cooker volunteers to help with this.

Yes, I was one of them. Many translators don't follow the cooker list though.

> None of this volunteers have reported bad issues, in fact there were
> no report. No news, good news.

W.r.t. the mdkkdm issue, this was raised on the cooker-i18n list weeks
ago, as well as put into bugzilla (bug 2769). No response whatsoever.

> Next time raise your hand before it's too late.

Oh please. If you're serious about this, the least you could have done was
to send a heads-up mail to the volunteers who applied and the cooker-i18n
list before going gold.

That said, I have to say I believe 9.1 has less critical l10n issues than
9.0 did.

regards,

-- 
Reinout van SchouwenArtificial Intelligence student
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]mobile phone: +31-6-44360778
GPG public key http://www.cs.vu.nl/~reinout/reinout.asc
MandrakeClub member



[Cooker] [Bug 2896] [drakconf] Important Keyboard Problem

2003-03-25 Thread kazmakurek
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2896

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-03-25 16:31 ---
The problem solved thanks for your attention :)

I can now use the CTRL-key 
Thanks.



--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



--- Reminder: ---
assigned_to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
status: RESOLVED
creation_date: 
description: 
When you set Turkish Q Keyboard , Ctrl key doesn't work on RC1 and RC2



Re: [Cooker] 9.1final == 9.1rc3

2003-03-25 Thread Eric Fernandez

> I agree!
> I hate to say it - but someone from Mandrake really should make this
clear.
> I'm also d/loading them and wonder what I'll find, when I install!
>
> Mike

If they do that, it is to avoid their server to be saturated. Thus we can
have more mirrors with the final.
BTW, club members will have some "secret mirrors" for downloading it.

Eric




Re: [Cooker] 9.1final == 9.1rc3

2003-03-25 Thread Mike Diack
I agree!
I hate to say it - but someone from Mandrake really should make this clear.
I'm also d/loading them and wonder what I'll find, when I install!

Mike

- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 2:36 PM
Subject: [Cooker] 9.1final == 9.1rc3



I'm currently downloading 9.1rc3...
Is it the same as final release ? I mean, is it just renamed ISOs of final
release ?

Alexander Tereschenko
Administrator of http://www.tvs.tv/
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web-site: http://www.tereschenko.com/




Re: [Cooker] 9.1final == 9.1rc3

2003-03-25 Thread Duncan
On Tue 25 Mar 2003 07:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted as excerpted below:
> I'm currently downloading 9.1rc3...
> Is it the same as final release ? I mean, is it just renamed ISOs of final
> release ?

According to the other threads on this list, probably so...  That's what they 
did for 9.0, and they already said 9.1 is complete, so rc3 would indeed 
appear to be the gold release, to be renamed as such soon.  Of course, who 
knows for sure whether there might be one or two final changes @ the rename, 
but that''s about as conclusive as it's gotten.

-- 
Duncan
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little
temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." --
Benjamin Franklin




[Cooker] Re: Requires & Provides on -devel packages (Continued)

2003-03-25 Thread Stefan van der Eijk
>> On Topic:
>> Is there a way to exclude files from a %files list? Quite some of
>> these duplicate because for instance the files for the icewm-light
>> theme is also included in icewm. Would be nice if these files can
>> excluded from a job.
>
> How about %exclude ?
That one is new to me.

> And wouldn't the packages conflict if they have the same files ? I think
> I  haven't seen this behaviour.

With the "icewm" example the files are identical. so when you install
icewm over icewm-light then rpm doesn't complain.

I only noticed that the same files were in both packages after running the
script.

Stefan





[Cooker] Diskdrake munching fstab comments [Was: How to get rid of "KDEInit could not launch 'kfmclient'" message?]

2003-03-25 Thread Duncan
On Mon 24 Mar 2003 09:34, Duncan posted as excerpted below:
> On Mon 24 Mar 2003 06:56, Pixel posted as excerpted below:
> > Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > ..  I was pretty disgusted with DiskDrake as well, after I'd put a
> > > bunch of comments in detialing the various mount options, ran
> > > DiskDrake, and not only had it delete or mix up the comments and order,
> > > but actually uncomment a bunch of stuff, so that when I rebooted, I had
> > > a bunch of root mount points like /this /option /is /pretty /useful,
> > > etc!
> >
> > please send the non-screwed fstab
>
> That was an entiremajor Mdk release ago now (8.1).  I'm hoping something
> like that isn't still around, altho like I said I haven't tried it lately.
>
> I'll try it again, tho, and post if a similar problem still exists..  Thx.

OK.  Tried it.  It isn't uncommenting stuff and creating weird root 
mountpoints with them, any more.  However, it still reorganizes things, 
removing comments I've put in there.

The original fstab is attached as fstab.jed.  (JED are my initials.  I often 
use that for a backup, when I'm afraid something might overwrite a .bak 
backup.)  The comments should be self explanatory.  Note that I use the long 
/dev/ide/host... paths as an urpmi upgrade at one point left devfs 
unworkable, and all my /dev/hdX partitions unmounted!  Using the longer 
native paths might not look so neat, but it works better in the event devfs 
doesn't.

I then used diskdrake to create a new partition out of some free space on 
/dev/hdb, made it ReiserFS, and set the mount point as /test, for this test.  
The resulting fstab is attached as fstab.munched.  Not only are all those 
notes about options gone, but so is my nice ordering by function.  Everything 
is tossed about pretty much randomly, or so it looks to me, with the 
categorizing comments still there, but no longer applicable to what's under 
them.  Furthermore, all my devfs-failure-safe paths have disappeared, to be 
replaced by totally nonfunctional paths, should devfs fail to load, for 
whatever reason.

What I EXPECT to happen, is that diskdrake ONLY makes changes to entries I've 
made changes to, in this case, appending a single new entry at the end of the 
file, leaving everything else as it was.

Should I file a bug report on this. or is this expectation to fancy, and it 
would just get marked WONTFIX or similar (or will this posting get it looked 
into)?

While I'm at it, last time I checked, XFdrake did something similar..  I run 
three monitors off of two video cards, so my XF86Config file is 
understandably a bit to complex for most automated tools to parse very well.  
However, making it so it didn't entirely foobar things if I did run it, would 
be nice.  Is something like that worth pursuing, or is that again a WONTFIX?

In both cases, saving the existing file to a backup of some sort, with a 
screen telling folks exactly what command to use to reverse the damage, if 
something went wrong, would be quite useful, IMO.  (Perhaps it already does 
this, which is why I used the .jed extension for my manual backup, as I also 
keep a .bak copy, but I can't tell if that's my .bak copy or diskdrake's, and 
there were no instructions telling me about it and how to reverse the damage 
in the event something went wrong, in any case.)

-- 
Duncan
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little
temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." --
Benjamin Franklin
# fstab file.
##
# Common MntOpts
# (no- prefix negates atime, auto, dev, exec, suid, user)
# (a)sync   (async default)
# atime update access times (default)
# auto  mount at boot and with -a option
# defaults  auto, async, dev, exec, rw, suid, nouser
# dev   interpret char/block special devs on fs
# exec  permit execution of binaries
# _netdev   net-access req'd to mount
# ro/rw read-only/read-writeable(rw default)
# suid  allow suid/sgid bits to take effect (default)
# user(s)   user may mount, impl. no- exec suid dev (default nouser)
#   (unless overridden) -s allows any unmount, else only mounting user
##
# Dev/Part, MntPnt, Type, MntOpt, Dump, FSCK
##

# /, /boot /swap
/dev/ide/host0/bus1/target0/lun0/part5 / reiserfs noatime 1 1
/dev/ide/host0/bus1/target0/lun0/part1 /boot reiserfs noatime 1 2
/dev/ide/host0/bus1/target0/lun0/part7 swap swap defaults 0 0

# removable
/dev/fd0 /mnt/floppy auto user,sync,exec,noauto 0 0
/dev/cdroms/cdrom0 /cd auto user,ro,noauto 0 0
/dev/cdroms/cdrom0 /cdx auto user,ro,exec,noauto 0 0
/dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/cd /cd auto ro,noauto,user,exec 0 0

# special
none /dev/shm tm

[Cooker] [Bug 2989] [sane-backends] Epson Perfection 1660 displayed as GT-8300

2003-03-25 Thread till
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2989

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever Confirmed||1



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-03-25 16:03 ---
GT-8300 is the name under which your scanner is sold in Japan. As the hardware
of the scanner is exactly the same all over the world, it tells always its
japanese name. Looks a little bit ugly on my test machine (typical office
configuration with 6 scanners on USB hub) when there are "GT-..." entries in the
XSane menu for all Epson Perfection scanners, but they scan.



--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



--- Reminder: ---
assigned_to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
status: NEW
creation_date: 
description: 
Just bought a new scanner - Epson Perfection 1660

1  Scannerdrake couldn't automatically detect and install it.
2  Using manual setup, I chose the model from the list and usb port.
3  Scannerdrake confirms by saying "The following scanner: GT-8300 flatbed
scanner is available on your system"

XSane also lists it as the GT-8300.  It works just fine.  Not sure where it
comes from since I couldn't find the number 8300 anywhere in ScannerDB or on the
SANE homepage.



Re: [Cooker] Re: Requires & Provides on -devel packages (Continued)

2003-03-25 Thread Stefan van der Eijk
>> Need to setup a SF project for the scripts...
> May i suggest joining youri project instead (see http://youri.zarb.org),
> and  make automatic and safe package building one of the objectives of
> the project  ?
Good one. I will.

I subscribed to the mailing list. Continue the slbd related discussion there?

Stefan





[Cooker] [Bug 3531] [Bugzilla] New: Wrong component: "libsasl-plug-ntlm"

2003-03-25 Thread till
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3531

   Product: Bugzilla
 Component: Bugzilla
   Summary: Wrong component: "libsasl-plug-ntlm"
   Version: 2.17
  Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


I have seen some bugs on Bugzilla, which are assigned to an arbitrary "Product"
and the "Component" is "libsasl2-plug-ntlm" even if the producty does not have a
comp[onent named "libsasl2-plug-ntlm". See for example bug #3520. It was also
the case in bug #3494 where I corrected it manually.



--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



[Cooker] 9.1final == 9.1rc3

2003-03-25 Thread webmaster

I'm currently downloading 9.1rc3...
Is it the same as final release ? I mean, is it just renamed ISOs of final release ?

Alexander Tereschenko
Administrator of http://www.tvs.tv/
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web-site: http://www.tereschenko.com/



Re: [Cooker] Re: Requires & Provides on -devel packages (Continued)

2003-03-25 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Stefan van der Eijk wrote:

> On Topic:
> Is there a way to exclude files from a %files list? Quite some of these
> duplicate because for instance the files for the icewm-light theme is also
> included in icewm. Would be nice if these files can excluded from a job.
>
> %files -n package1
> %{_bindir}/* !%{_binddir}/dont_want_this_here
>
> %files -n package1
> %{_binddir}/dont_want_this_here
>
> to avoid duplication = save ISO space.
>

%exclude?
%files -n package1
%{_bindir}/*
%exclude %{_binddir}/dont_want_this_here

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x121
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE+gGuCrJK6UGDSBKcRArDVAJwMs5noPhe/ythVd2SjBBD75FN8bwCgx1Dx
xTBFBpB6/QeX5quvcMjbcww=
=Gszr
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] Re: Requires & Provides on -devel packages (Continued)

2003-03-25 Thread Guillaume Rousse
Ainsi parlait Stefan van der Eijk :
> >> I'm using a dedicated machine (in a VMware) to do this at the moment.
> >> A normal user performs the rebuilding, so damage to the system should
> >> be limited.
> >>
> >> When Jeff Garzik was still employed at Mandrakesoft we discussed using
> >> a chroot() environment to build packages. The idea was to install a
> >> stripped system (basesystem + rpm-build + BuildRequires) for every
> >> package to be rebuilt in a chroot environment. In the end we didn't go
> >> through with the idea.
> >
> > Creating a slim clean build environment for each package seems to be
> > overkill (to me). I simply don't have the resources. I have one fat
> > clean build environment for each distribution.
>
> Let me rephraise that. The script will create a build environment, build
> the package, remove the build environment, and restarts. Keeping the build
> environment intact after rebuilding for each package is insane.
>
> > Building as a user helps you not to pollute your build environment, but
> > for each violation the build is halted. Compare this to rpmbuild telling
> > you only the first file from %files it cannot find ;)
>
> Yes. My scripts (mentioned in a earlier post --> can be found at:
> http://eijk.homelinux.org/~stefan/slbd.html) do this. After each build a
> cleanup is done (temp & build directories are emptied, BuildRequires are
> de-installed).
>
> Need to setup a SF project for the scripts...
May i suggest joining youri project instead (see http://youri.zarb.org), and 
make automatic and safe package building one of the objectives of the project 
?

I've been in touch with Matthias, the guy maintaining freshrpm.net, at FOSDEM, 
he would be very interested by such topic. He already started such project 
two years ago on sf.net, without interesting anyone else as him.
-- 
All components become obsolete. 
-- Murphy's Computer Laws n°8




[Cooker] Re: Requires & Provides on -devel packages (Continued)

2003-03-25 Thread Stefan van der Eijk
>> Before something like this is implemented, the current FUNDEMENTAL
>> breakage in the dependancies of the -devel packages needs to be
>> resolved. My experience with finding the right BuildRequires is that
>> due to the fact that the dependancies for -devel packages are not
>> automatically found it's difficult (if not impossible) to maintain.
>
> I see large potential in Dag's method. He is currently using it to
> see/avoid writes outside the buildroot, but it could be used to also
> register all the reads and to deduce the BuildRequires packages from
> that. Possibly one would get too many dependencies, as configure
> sometimes `overchecks' the environment, but it would give the packager a
> maximum set to choose from.

One thing you shouldn't forget is that many files and DIRECTORIES (the
directories are the worst --> rpmlint doesn't bork about them) exist in
multiple files. These packages will show up in the list, eventhough the
file wasn't installed.

This has everything todo with developper discipline.

On a urpmi enabled system this script will lookup all duplicate files &
directories:


#!/usr/bin/perl

my %count;
my %packages;
open F, "parsehdlist --files --quiet /var/lib/urpmi/hdlist.* |";
while () {
/([^:]*):(\S*)/ or next;
$count{$2} = $count{$2} + 1;
$package{$2} = "${1}" . " " . "$package{$2}";
}

foreach $a (sort keys %count) {
if ( $count{$a} >= 2 ) {
print "$a $package{$a}\n";
}
}

Off Topic: I don't know perl, but I'd like the script to accept a media
switch (like urpmi) so you can choose which urpmi media you want to check
against. Right now it just takes everything it can find
--> /var/lib/urpmi/hdlist.*

for Mandrake cooker, Mandrake contrib and PLF this adds up to 8670
duplicate files currently.


On Topic:
Is there a way to exclude files from a %files list? Quite some of these
duplicate because for instance the files for the icewm-light theme is also
included in icewm. Would be nice if these files can excluded from a job.

%files -n package1
%{_bindir}/* !%{_binddir}/dont_want_this_here

%files -n package1
%{_binddir}/dont_want_this_here

to avoid duplication = save ISO space.

with kind regards,

Stefan van der Eijk





[Cooker] Re: Requires & Provides on -devel packages (Continued)

2003-03-25 Thread Stefan van der Eijk
>> I'm using a dedicated machine (in a VMware) to do this at the moment.
>> A normal user performs the rebuilding, so damage to the system should
>> be limited.

>> When Jeff Garzik was still employed at Mandrakesoft we discussed using
>> a chroot() environment to build packages. The idea was to install a
>> stripped system (basesystem + rpm-build + BuildRequires) for every
>> package to be rebuilt in a chroot environment. In the end we didn't go
>> through with the idea.

> Creating a slim clean build environment for each package seems to be
> overkill (to me). I simply don't have the resources. I have one fat
> clean build environment for each distribution.

Let me rephraise that. The script will create a build environment, build
the package, remove the build environment, and restarts. Keeping the build
environment intact after rebuilding for each package is insane.

> Building as a user helps you not to pollute your build environment, but
> for each violation the build is halted. Compare this to rpmbuild telling
> you only the first file from %files it cannot find ;)

Yes. My scripts (mentioned in a earlier post --> can be found at:
http://eijk.homelinux.org/~stefan/slbd.html) do this. After each build a
cleanup is done (temp & build directories are emptied, BuildRequires are
de-installed).

Need to setup a SF project for the scripts...

>> > I'd like to help get this thing inside rpmbuild (and in debugging it
>> more). As far as I can see, what rpmbuild needs is easier for
>> collecting build requirements, than what I'm doing in Soapbox. But
>> reality bites...

>> It would be cool if rpmbuild would be able to build in a clean
>> environment, but do you think this should be mandatory for rpmbuild,
>> or should such a mode be turned on by an option?

> Hmmm, Soapbox is not about creating a clean environment for building.
> IMO rpmbuild should never have to write outside its builddir and
> buildroot. You could use Soapbox to do this.
OK, but isn't this what happens when you let the rpm's be rebuilt as user
(not root)?

>> Before something like this is implemented, the current FUNDEMENTAL
>> breakage in the dependancies of the -devel packages needs to be
>> resolved. My experience with finding the right BuildRequires is that
>> due to the fact that the dependancies for -devel packages are not
>> automatically found it's difficult (if not impossible) to maintain.

> Well, you could use the same techniques (overloading open()) to make a
> list of all the requirements a build-process has. And list them for
> inclusion or add them to the source-package automatically.

The strace mode of slbd.sh does this...

OK. With this you will have a list of all the files that were needed for
rebuilding the package. Translating that to packages is a peice of cake.
But that list of packages is quite exhausting. For the BuildRequires you
only need to "top" packages in the rpm hierarchy.

When libpng3-devel is required, there is no need to list libpng3 and zlib1
--> these are redundant (Build)Requires.

> And that was the original intent of my mail ;)
Please try out slbd. It might suite your needs quite well. Perhaps only
the chroot() part needs to be added.

with kind regards,

Stefan

> «Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors»

cool .sig!





[Cooker] [Bug 3524] [drakxtools] Running drakconf periodically makes the kernel lose the mouse

2003-03-25 Thread scherer.michael
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3524





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-03-25 14:40 ---
Created an attachment (id=394)
 --> (http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/attachment.cgi?id=394&action=view)
lspcidrake -v output




--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



--- Reminder: ---
assigned_to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
status: NEW
creation_date: 
description: 
I have a USB Microsoft Intellimouse connected to a VIA686A motherboard's USB
port.  Often (nine of ten times) when I run drakconf, during the initialization
screen, the mouse will stop responding, and its device entry dissapears from
USB.  The only way to get the mouse back is to reboot, or to "rmmod usb-uhci;
insmod usb-uhci", which sometimes causes a kernel OOPS.  This is with the
multimedia kernel, and XF4.2 with the ATI Radeon driver.



[Cooker] [Bug 3524] [drakxtools] Running drakconf periodically makes the kernel lose the mouse

2003-03-25 Thread scherer.michael
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3524

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEEDINFO|NEW



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-03-25 14:36 ---
tried a new kernel, the error still occur.  
  
It come from /usr/lib/libDrakX/detect_device.pm, procedure usb_probe  
The call to c::usb_probe is the one which block from time to time.  
  
I was not able to debug more, since it was not perl.  
  
But the error can be reproduce by running lspcidrake a few time.  
It block just after detecting the video card, and just before trying to detect a usb 
hub.  
  
  



--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



--- Reminder: ---
assigned_to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
status: NEW
creation_date: 
description: 
I have a USB Microsoft Intellimouse connected to a VIA686A motherboard's USB
port.  Often (nine of ten times) when I run drakconf, during the initialization
screen, the mouse will stop responding, and its device entry dissapears from
USB.  The only way to get the mouse back is to reboot, or to "rmmod usb-uhci;
insmod usb-uhci", which sometimes causes a kernel OOPS.  This is with the
multimedia kernel, and XF4.2 with the ATI Radeon driver.



Re: [Cooker] problems making kde 3.1.1 rpms

2003-03-25 Thread AAW
On Monday, March 24, 2003 06:50 pm, Mario Vazquez wrote:
> /home/me/rpm/tmp/rpm-tmp.54272: line 38: unexpected EOF while looking for
> matching ``'

You have a syntax error in script /home/me/rpm/tmp/rpm-tmp.54272 (missing 
single quote or backtick). Identify the problem in the script then correct it 
in the spec file.

Arn




Re: [Cooker] Fwd: mpeg2enc timing results [narfi@cs.wisc.edu]

2003-03-25 Thread w9ya
Giuseppe;

Actually my remarks were (mostly) meant for Adam. Sorry about that., I think I 
am agreeing with you, at least in part. The RPM building option you mention 
is interesting.

Hmmm...well, can I get your input on an article on freshmeat? The URL is 

http://freshmeat.net/articles/view/730/

I would be especially interested in any comments concerning some of the later 
comments on the article.

Bob


On Monday 24 March 2003 03:22 pm, Giuseppe Ghibò wrote:
> w9ya wrote:
> >Again, some of the flags are being used wrong:
> >
> >Giuseppe please check the gcc docs, as some (most) flags are redundant
> > with -02 and almost all are with -03. Things have changed radically in
> > this area with the upgrade to 3.x
> >
> >Bob Finch
>
> Which flags are you talking about? I wasn't discussing neither about the
> flags used in
> the compilation example below nor in the %optflags,
> i.e. whether -mcpu and -march could coexists. The docs says they can,
> and with
> -march=i586 -mcpu=pentiumpro in i586 %optflags the behaviour should be
> to get optimization
> for pentiumpro architectures and the -march=i586 would let to restrict
> the instructions set used
> only to i586 set. Anyway you can try also with:
>
> rpm -ba --target i686-mandrake-linux --with mmx mjpegtools.spec
>
> which will use only one of -march/-mcpu, and the performance
> are more or less the same as of with --target i586-mandrake-linux.
>
> >On Monday 24 March 2003 12:24 pm, Giuseppe Ghibò wrote:
> >>w9ya wrote:
> >>>As I understand the gcc docs, using both -march and -mcpu is odd. You
> >>>should probably be running these tests with just -march or just -mcpu.
> >>>There may be some other issues as well, but this is as good a place to
> >>>start as any.
> >>>
> >>>Bob Finch
> >>>
> >>>On Wednesday 19 March 2003 03:12 pm, Austin wrote:
> Here's a simple benchmark from Narfi.
> 
> Athlon XP 2100.
> Asus A7N8X motherboard (NForce2)
> 512 MB memory, PC2700 2-2-2
> Mandrake 9.0
> 
> ###
> # Compiling for athlon-xp
> export CFLAGS="-march=athlon-xp -mcpu=athlon-xp -O3
>  -finline-limit=1 -ffast-math -fomit-frame-pointer"; export
>  CXXFLAGS=$CFLAGS; make clean; ./configure  --disable-assert
>  --enable-cmov-extension
> --enable-simd-accel; make
> 
> ###
> # Compiling for i586
> export CFLAGS="-march=i586 -mcpu=i586 -O3"; export CXXFLAGS=$CFLAGS;
>  make clean; ./configure  --disable-assert --enable-cmov-extension
> --enable-simd-accel; make
> 
> ###
> # Compiling for i586, no MMX used
> export CFLAGS="-march=i586 -mcpu=i586 -O3"; export CXXFLAGS=$CFLAGS;
>  make clean; ./configure  --disable-assert --disable-cmov-extension
> --disable-simd-accel; make
> 
> He ran these 3 versions of mpeg2enc one after the other, each 3
> times and I picked the best time for each version. The file encoded was
> only 127MB so it fit into RAM.
> 
> The best times of the 4 were:
> athlon-xp:12.16
> i586: 13.24
> i586, no mmx: 57.65
> 
> [ start quote ]
> 
> In short: There are >>some<< packages which >>need to<< have mmx
>  enabled. These numbers should show that beyond any doubt!
> 
> How we do it is a different question.
> 
> My opinion is that going all the way and allowing the user to recompile
> all packages is a potential support nightmare that Mandrake cannot risk
> and that we should do the minimal: Only do this for a small number of
> select packages where one can prove there is a significant benefit.
> 
> If somebody recompiles OOo for athlon-xp and can show that the startup
> time after a reboot can be cut by 50% when compared to the i586
>  version, I am all for it. Otherwise, I don't think it's worth the
>  risk.
> 
> Narfi
> 
> [ end quote ]
> 
> So you see,  4.4 times faster by enabling MMX, and 4.7 times faster by
> also enabling fast-math athlon XP.  Thus it looks like your average app
> will see very little increase in performance by recompiling for XP or
>  P4 or whatever, but as it stands now, our video apps are almost
>  unuseably slow.
> 
> Austin
> >>
> >>I get a 3.5 times faster on PIII. Honestly I never found yet a package
> >>that will increase
> >>performance of even 10% just changing the compiler flags. Generally
> >>the best achievement from current %optflags to best one or even forcing
> >>-ffast-math and/or -fpmath=sse -march=..., is negligible, from 2-3% to
> >>5%. Effectively in package
> >>mjpegtools this performance increase is severe tue to mmx usage; you can
> >>try, compiling this one:
> >>
> >>http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~ghibo/mjpegtools-1.6.1-2mdk.src.rpm
> >>
> >>using
> >>
> >> rpm -ba --with mmx mjpegtools.spec
> >>
> >>note how the performance increase is almost ZERO removing -ffast-math
> >>from CFLAGS, and or
> 

[Cooker] [Bug 509] [kernel] Intel ICH4 based Motherboards-- sound and IDE DMA do not work

2003-03-25 Thread mija
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-03-25 13:58 ---
I have got, the same or equal problem with the Intel audion on ICH4 Mainboard 
(MSI) with 9.1RC2, I found out, that by defoult it try to start alsa and oss 
driver at the same time, I changed with harddrake the default driver to oss and 
Alsa desablet, since that it runs fine...




--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



--- Reminder: ---
assigned_to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
status: NEW
creation_date: 
description: 
The intel motherboards with the ICH4 controller have severe problems with kernel
2.4.19.16mdk.
a) On boot up, the message
PCI: Device 00:1f.1 not available because of resource collisions

The relevant sections from dmesg are

The first reference to 00:1f.1


PCI: PCI BIOS revision 2.10 entry at 0xf0031, last bus=2
PCI: Using configuration type 1
PCI: Probing PCI hardware
PCI: Using IRQ router PIIX [8086/24c0] at 00:1f.0
PCI: Found IRQ 9 for device 00:1f.1
PCI: Sharing IRQ 9 with 00:1d.2
.Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver Revision: 7.00alpha2
ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; override with idebus=xx
ICH4: IDE controller on PCI bus 00 dev f9
PCI: Device 00:1f.1 not available because of resource collisions
ICH4: (ide_setup_pci_device:) Could not enable device.
hda: Maxtor 91531U3, ATA DISK drive
hdb: ST340016A, ATA DISK drive
hdc: HL-DT-ST CD-ROM GCR-8520B, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive
hdd: HITACHI DVD-ROM GD-2000, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive
ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14
ide1 at 0x170-0x177,0x376 on irq 15

lspci gives
...
00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 24c0 (rev 01)
00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82801DB ICH4 IDE (rev 01)
00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 24c3 (rev 01)
...

b) trying to start up dma does not work.
hdparm /dev/hda

/dev/hda:
 multcount= 16 (on)
 IO_support   =  0 (default 16-bit)
 unmaskirq=  0 (off)
 using_dma=  0 (off)
 keepsettings =  0 (off)
 readonly =  0 (off)
 readahead=  8 (on)
 geometry = 1868/255/63, sectors = 30015216, start = 0

]>hdparm -d1 /dev/hda

/dev/hda:
 setting using_dma to 1 (on)
 HDIO_SET_DMA failed: Operation not permitted
 using_dma=  0 (off)

The disks are very slow.

c) Sound does not work. The standare oss drivers do not load at all. -- error
that the codec cannot be intialised. The alsa drivers load fine, but again
no sound. (again using the onboard sound ICH4 sound card)



[Cooker] [Bug 3385] [MySQL] mysql does not start

2003-03-25 Thread mija
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3385





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-03-25 13:51 ---
I did found, that by default install mysql user does not exist at the install 
time. I have created one and uninstalled mysql. After second installation of 
mysql it worked everything fine. At firstime it sad mysql user not found, 
aftercreation it sad, mysql allready running, cannot start. Deinstall and 
deletion of /var/lib/mysql/* and then install did helped finaly



--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



--- Reminder: ---
assigned_to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
status: UNCONFIRMED
creation_date: 
description: 
/etc/init.d/mysql start  
  
MySQL can not start ... even through there is no other mysql-server running.  
Actually it says [OK] after running "mysql start" but in the logfile you see that  
it didn´t. 
  
/log/lib/mysql/"mymaschine".err  
===  
030316 23:48:36  mysqld started  
030316 23:48:37  Can't start server : Bind on unix socket: Permission denied  
030316 23:48:37  Do you already have another mysqld server running on socket:  
/var/lib/mysql/mysql.sock ?  
030316 23:48:37  Aborting  
  
030316 23:48:37  /usr/sbin/mysqld: Shutdown Complete  
  
030316 23:48:37  mysqld ended



Re: [Cooker] urpmi features

2003-03-25 Thread Duncan
On Tue 25 Mar 2003 03:05, Guillaume Rousse posted as excerpted below:
> Ainsi parlait eddie :
> > 
> > 
>
> Please use standard text for email.

No kidding!

> > Then you should talk to Texstar @ Pclinuxonline. He had a great system
> > with apt-get and Synaptic that worked with a Gui and worked wonderful,
> > although he doesn't have the time to maintain two update mirrors. If
> > one guy can maintain a program like that, why can't Mandrake?
>
> Nobody told this wasn't possible. Just that isn't a priority. Developping
> GUI is heavy and costly, especially compared to adding a switch in CLI. If
> you want advanced options, you're supposed to be an advanced user, meaning
> able to read the doc and a shell prompt...

What I'd like to see is a solution I've seen elsewhere..

1)  After adding any usual GUI-ified options as thought appropriate, have a 
text box (or a page of text boxes for a multi-function app that calls 
multiple other tools and/or calls a single tool in multiple contexts) where 
the user can add additional command line switches and params as so desired.  
The only support needed is to provide the text boxes, one per context, and 
ensure that their contents gets passed when the specified tool is called 
within that specified context.

One example of the above that I've been working with lately is K3B, the KDE 
CD/DVD image burning software front-end to the various ripping/burning/isofs 
tools.  In it's prefs dialog, it has an entire page/tab listing the various 
back end tools, with a text box beside each, in which you can add advanced 
switches as appropriate.  Those that don't know about the additional switches 
and/or don't want/need to bother with them  (like me, for the most part) can 
just leave them blank, but the several of the back end tools it invokes have 
all sorts of corner-case command line options unneeded by most folks, and 
having those text boxes, for additional switches to be added at invocation, 
means a lot of folks can use the GUI, that would otherwise have to use the 
command line, or a different front end that provided such options.

2)  A (perhaps optional) popup, that lists the progress details and any 
errors, as the process progresses.  One of the big reasons (besides the lack 
of advanced options in the GUI) I use URPMI rather than the various GUI 
utils, is that the command line version lists the stuff as it downloads, and 
I can see where something stalls, if it does.  When I'm updating multiple 
source lists, and I see the internet activity stop for to long a time, 
without returning a success or failure dialog, on the graphical tools, I have 
no way of knowing where the hold-up is.  With the command line, I can 
immediately see what mirror isn't responding, or whatever other problem may 
be occuring.  In addition, I like seeing the scrolling status, as the 
individual components are d/led.  A popup window with the same info scrolled 
in its display on the GUI version would be very nice...

An example of this is what KPackage does, when installing an RPM.  It pops up 
a status window, with the various commands and results as they would normally 
be output on the command line, if one were to invoke rpm from there.  Now, in 
KPackage, it isn't normally such a big deal, because the process isn't so 
long, with so many steps, as a multi-mirror update, and then an urpmi 
--auto-select is, but giving GURPMI or Software Installer or whatever the 
graphical title of the month is now, the same sort of update progress window, 
would be very useful.  (The optional part of it could be handled with a 
simple checkbox, either as a global option in some settings dialog, or on a 
per-task basis, right before clicking the "go" button.)

Of course, doing it all in a nicely scrolling Konsole window works fine for 
me, here, but if we are going to have a GUI, we might as well make it a 
decently functional one, usable by power users as well as newbies, and 
continuing to support new back-end options, even without new versions of the 
GUI every time the back-end changes.

-- 
Duncan
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little
temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." --
Benjamin Franklin




[Cooker] [Bug 3510] [evolution] Contact lists no longer work

2003-03-25 Thread richtl
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3510





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-03-25 13:10 ---
Thanks Frederic,

I should have checked the Evolution bugzilla before I logged this to
Mandrake.

Rich

On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 03:31, fcrozat wrote:





  
  


Thanks Frederic,

I should have checked the Evolution bugzilla before I logged this to Mandrake.

Rich

On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 03:31, fcrozat wrote:

http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3510";>http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3510

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever Confirmed||1



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-03-25 09:31 ---
Correction, this is Ximian bug 37854..



--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.



--- Reminder: ---
assigned_to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
status: NEW
creation_date: 
description: 
As of 1.2.2, when I try to send email to a contact list, I get a popup with the
following message:

"Must specify recipients in order to send this message."

I tried creating a new contact list and get the same error when I try to send to
it. This problem occurs on 1.2.2-1 through 1.2.2-3, but did not exist before 
1.2.2.




-- 
ars Cognita   The Art of Knowledge
  -
  Richard Tango-Lowy
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  www.arscognita.com










--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



--- Reminder: ---
assigned_to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
status: NEW
creation_date: 
description: 
As of 1.2.2, when I try to send email to a contact list, I get a popup with the
following message:

"Must specify recipients in order to send this message."

I tried creating a new contact list and get the same error when I try to send to
it. This problem occurs on 1.2.2-1 through 1.2.2-3, but did not exist before 1.2.2.



[Cooker] [Bug 3530] [kdebase] New: some fonts in Russian locale are missing

2003-03-25 Thread sergei
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3530

   Product: kdebase
 Component: i18n
   Summary: some fonts in Russian locale are missing
   Version: 3.1-83mdk
  Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


That's it: in konquerror, for instance, no fonts on buttons are shown. Typing this 
text 
now I am just guessing what these 2 buttons below this "Description" window could 
mean. Hope I'll press the right one ;-) 
 
Another problem: Ctrl-key is disabled in ru-winkeys layout. So I can switch from US to 
RU by pressing Ctrl+Alt+K, but not back.



--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



Re: [Cooker] Unpackaged rpms

2003-03-25 Thread Warly
Texstar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Is there a list of packages in cooker that will not appear on the mdk 9.1 CDs? 
> I know the OO help files and kdeartwork won't but are there any other ones?

Depends if you include the contrib inside or not.

>From contribs only 680 packages out of 2500 were selected by lenny.

-- 
Warly



Re: [Cooker] cyrus sasl source packages

2003-03-25 Thread Martin Fahrendorf
Am Dienstag, 25. März 2003 12:30 schrieb Stefan van der Eijk:
> > Is there any reason, why the sasl packages version 1.5.28 and 2.1.12 are
> > stored together in one source rpm?
>
> 1/ RedHat also does it

Hm

> 2/ All packages (still) require sasl7

Ok, that is a reason to install libsasl7 but to bundle the source rpm with the 
2.1.12 version?

> 3/ sasl2 needs to be in the distro

OK, I don't want to say not to use sasl2, but why is it need to stick 
together? I usualy need to patch the libsasl7 package (I need ldap support in 
sasl) and it is easyer to use the rpm way. but now I have to change the whole 
sasl2.1.12 package (and need to compile all the stuff afterwards).

>
> Stefan

Martin
-- 

H E L I X Gesellschaft für Software & Engineering mbH

Hanauer Landstrasse 52  Telefon (069) 4789 35-30
60314 Frankfurt am Main Telefax (069) 4789 35-44

http://www.helix-gmbh.net[EMAIL PROTECTED]



pgp0.pgp
Description: signature


  1   2   >