[Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] mkcd-3.7.0-1mdk

2003-11-18 Thread David Walser
You trampled Stefan's fix.

Warly wrote:
 Name: mkcd Relocations: (not relocateable)
 Version : 3.7.0 Vendor: MandrakeSoft
 Release : 1mdk  Build Date: Tue Nov 18 10:20:42 2003
 -=-=-=-
 Warly [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3.7.0-1mdk
 
 - new noprovide option for fixed dir
 - various fixes for the verbose side effect problem
 - fix Optimization side-effect if the process fails
 - new sort feature
 - fix sequential mode
 
 -=-=-=-
 mkcd.spec changed
 --- mkcd-3.6.3-2mdk.src.rpm/mkcd.spec 2003-11-18 15:22:33.0 +0100
 +++ mkcd-3.7.0-1mdk.src.rpm/mkcd.spec 2003-11-18 15:22:33.0 +0100
 @@ -18,8 +18,7 @@
  Prefix: %{_prefix}
  Requires: perl-File-NCopy perl-Image-Size perl-URPM
  BuildArch: noarch
 -BuildRequires:   libxslt-proc
 -BuildRequires:   docbook-style-xsl
 +BuildRequires: libxslt-proc
  
  %description
  mkcd script eases the packages repartition over CDs, 
  %changelog
 -* Fri Oct 24 2003 Stefan van der Eijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3.6.3-2mdk
 -- BuildRequires
 +* Sat Oct 25 2003 Warly [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3.7.0-1mdk
 +- new noprovide option for fixed dir
 +- various fixes for the verbose side effect problem
 +- fix Optimization side-effect if the process fails
 +- new sort feature
 +- fix sequential mode
 +
 +* Wed Oct 22 2003 Warly [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3.6.4-1mdk
 +- fix hdlist based CD creation
  
  * Tue Sep 23 2003 Warly [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3.6.3-1mdk
  - small fix in addRPMToList
 
 




[Cooker] Re: always the same files, please do something

2003-11-15 Thread David Walser
The same thing is happening with rsync and a bunch of files in contrib.

Quel Qun wrote:
 I'll be the loud mouth. Please fix the mirror problems. fmirror is
 always downloading the same files.




[Cooker] Configuration problems with KDE 3.1.93

2003-11-08 Thread David Siska
Hi folks,

I've recently downloaded KDE 3.1.93 packages and everything seems to be just 
great but: 
1, when  I run kconfigure I don't see most of the config options (there seem 
to be only the old 3.1.3 there

2, in the menu-Configuration, there there two KDE entries, one containing 
probably the new 3.1.93 entries, the other probably the old 3.1.3 entries.

3, when I try to acces my bookmarks from the desktop menu, it KDE does not 
know that it should open them, despite the fact that I have 
/etc/alternatives/webclient-kde - /usr/bin/konqueror.

Any ideas? Should I file it as a bug? Or is there some simple trick I don't 
know about?

David

P.S. kbuildsycoca is complaining when it's run:
kbuildsycoca: Recreating ksycoca file (/var/tmp/kdecache-david/ksycoca, 
version 70)
kbuildsycoca: VFolderMenu::mergeFile: /etc/xdg/menus/mdk-configure-kde.menu
kbuildsycoca: Menu applications-kmenuedit.menu not found.
kbuildsycoca: VFolderMenu::mergeFile:
kbuildsycoca: Processing KDE Legacy dirs for KDE
kbuildsycoca: processKDELegacyDirs()
kbuildsycoca: Looking up applications under /usr/share/applications/
kbuildsycoca: Looking up applications under /usr/share/applications/kde/
kbuildsycoca: Looking up applications under /usr/share/applications/mdk/
kbuildsycoca: WARNING: 'Multimedia/Video/Gxine.desktop' specifies undefined 
mimetype/servicetype 'video/x-avi'
kbuildsycoca: WARNING: 'kmixctrl_restore.desktop' specifies undefined 
mimetype/servicetype 'Daemon'
kbuildsycoca: WARNING: '/usr/share/applications/kde/noatun.desktop' specifies 
undefined mimetype/servicetype 'audio/x-mp2'
kbuildsycoca: WARNING: 'nsplugin.desktop' specifies undefined 
mimetype/servicetype 'application/x-mplayer2'
kbuildsycoca: WARNING: 'Multimedia/Graphics/The GIMP.desktop' specifies 
undefined mimetype/servicetype 'image/bmp'
kbuildsycoca: WARNING: 'Multimedia/Graphics/The GIMP.desktop' specifies 
undefined mimetype/servicetype 'image/fits'
kbuildsycoca: WARNING: 'Multimedia/Graphics/The GIMP.desktop' specifies 
undefined mimetype/servicetype 'image/pcx'
kbuildsycoca: WARNING: 'Multimedia/Graphics/The GIMP.desktop' specifies 
undefined mimetype/servicetype 'image/pix'
kbuildsycoca: WARNING: 'Multimedia/Graphics/The GIMP.desktop' specifies 
undefined mimetype/servicetype 'image/pnm'
kbuildsycoca: WARNING: 'kxkb.desktop' specifies undefined mimetype/servicetype 
'Daemon'
kbuildsycoca: WARNING: '/usr/share/applications/kde/kaboodle.desktop' 
specifies undefined mimetype/servicetype 'audio/x-mp2'
kbuildsycoca: WARNING: '/usr/share/applications/mdk/kuickshow.desktop' 
specifies undefined mimetype/servicetype 'image/bmp'
kbuildsycoca: WARNING: '/usr/share/applications/mdk/kuickshow.desktop' 
specifies undefined mimetype/servicetype 'image/x-png'
kbuildsycoca: WARNING: '/usr/share/applications/mdk/kuickshow.desktop' 
specifies undefined mimetype/servicetype 'image/x-eim'
kbuildsycoca: WARNING: 'Multimedia/Video/Xine.desktop' specifies undefined 
mimetype/servicetype 'video/x-avi'
kbuildsycoca: WARNING: 'kcertpart.desktop' specifies undefined 
mimetype/servicetype 'application/binary-certificate'
kbuildsycoca: WARNING: 'Multimedia/Sound/Xmms.desktop' specifies undefined 
mimetype/servicetype 'audio/x-ogg'
kbuildsycoca: WARNING: '/usr/share/applications/kde/kmid.desktop' specifies 
undefined mimetype/servicetype 'audio/midi'
kbuildsycoca: WARNING: 'kaboodleengine.desktop' specifies undefined 
mimetype/servicetype 'audio/x-mp2'
kbuildsycoca: WARNING: 'mdk/Use office tools/Create a text document.desktop' 
specifies undefined mimetype/servicetype 'application/x-doc'
kbuildsycoca: WARNING: 'mdk/View, modify, or create graphics/Manipulate 
pictures.desktop' specifies undefined mimetype/servicetype 'image/bmp'
kbuildsycoca: WARNING: 'mdk/View, modify, or create graphics/Manipulate 
pictures.desktop' specifies undefined mimetype/servicetype 'image/fits'
kbuildsycoca: WARNING: 'mdk/View, modify, or create graphics/Manipulate 
pictures.desktop' specifies undefined mimetype/servicetype 'image/pcx'
kbuildsycoca: WARNING: 'mdk/View, modify, or create graphics/Manipulate 
pictures.desktop' specifies undefined mimetype/servicetype 'image/pix'
kbuildsycoca: WARNING: 'mdk/View, modify, or create graphics/Manipulate 
pictures.desktop' specifies undefined mimetype/servicetype 'image/pnm'
kbuildsycoca: WARNING: 'mdk/View, modify, or create graphics/Manipulate 
pictures.desktop' specifies undefined mimetype/servicetype ''
kbuildsycoca: WARNING: 'katepart.desktop' specifies undefined 
mimetype/servicetype 'text/x-csharp-src'
kbuildsycoca: WARNING: 'katepart.desktop' specifies undefined 
mimetype/servicetype 'text/x-csharp-hde'
kbuildsycoca: WARNING: 'katepart.desktop' specifies undefined 
mimetype/servicetype 'text/x-eiffel-src'
kbuildsycoca: WARNING: 'katepart.desktop' specifies undefined 
mimetype/servicetype 'text/x-ferite-src'
kbuildsycoca: WARNING: 'katepart.desktop' specifies undefined 
mimetype/servicetype 'text/x-ilerpg-src'
kbuildsycoca: WARNING: 'katepart.desktop

Re: [Cooker] two point six

2003-11-05 Thread David Coe
Austin wrote:

Okay, I know everyone has been itching for a really bad song, written in
ten minutes, and recorded in less than twenty, about the new kernel, so
here it is:
http://groundstate.ca/twopointsix.ogg
Bravo ... encore ...

--
David Coe



[Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] nss_ldap-211-3mdk

2003-11-05 Thread David Walser
You just trampled on Vincent's fixes...

Luca Berra wrote:
 Name: nss_ldap Relocations: (not relocateable)
 Version : 211   Vendor: Luca Berra [EMAIL 
 PROTECTED]
 Release : 3mdk  Build Date: Sat Nov  1 13:57:21 2003
 -=-=-=-
 Luca Berra [EMAIL PROTECTED] 211-3mdk
 
 - fixed db4
 - changed ldap2-static-devel buildrequires to ldap2-devel
 - don't buildrequire gdbm-devel
 - 211-2mdk has been lost in a time warp
 
 -=-=-=-
 -%configure --with-ldap-lib=openldap --libdir=/%_lib
 +%configure --with-ldap-lib=openldap --libdir=/lib
  %__make
  popd
  
 @@ -85,16 +88,16 @@
  rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
  
  install -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}
 -install -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%_lib/security
 +install -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/lib/security
  
  # Install the nsswitch module.
  %make install DESTDIR=${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} INST_UID=`id -u` INST_GID=`id -g` \
 - libdir=/%_lib
 + libdir=/lib
  
  
  # Install the module for PAM.
  pushd pam_ldap-%{pam_ldap_version}
 -%make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT libdir=/%_lib
 +%make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT libdir=/lib
  popd
  echo secret  $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_sysconfdir}/ldap.secret
  
 @@ -124,16 +127,23 @@
  %doc nsswitch.ldap certutil ldap.conf
  %attr (600,root,root) %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/ldap.secret
  %attr (644,root,root) %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/ldap.conf
 -/%_lib/*so*
 +/lib/*so*
  
  %files -n pam_ldap 
  %defattr(-,root,root)
  %doc 
 pam_ldap-%{pam_ldap_version}/{AUTHORS,NEWS,COPYING,COPYING.LIB,README,ChangeLog,pam.d,chsh,chfn,ldap.conf}
 -/%_lib/security/*so*
 +/lib/security/*so*
  
  %changelog
 -* Fri Oct 17 2003 Vincent Danen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 207-4mdk
 -- use /%%_lib not /lib so libs are installed in the right place for amd64
 +* Sat Nov 01 2003 Luca Berra [EMAIL PROTECTED] 211-3mdk
 +- fixed db4
 +- changed ldap2-static-devel buildrequires to ldap2-devel
 +- don't buildrequire gdbm-devel
 +- 211-2mdk has been lost in a time warp
 +
 +* Fri Oct 17 2003 Florin [EMAIL PROTECTED] 211-1mdk
 +- nss_ldap 211
 +- pam_ldap 165
  




[Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gaim-0.72-1mdk

2003-11-05 Thread David Walser
You trampled Gwenole's fixes...

Laurent Culioli wrote:
 Name: gaim Relocations: (not relocateable)
 Version : 0.72  Vendor: MandrakeSoft
 Release : 1mdk  Build Date: Wed Nov  5 11:14:37 2003
 
 -=-=-=-
 Laurent Culioli [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0.72-1mdk
 
 - gaim 0.72
 - gaim-encryption 2.16
 
 -=-=-=-
 gaim.spec changed
 --- gaim-0.68-2mdk.src.rpm/gaim.spec  2003-11-05 11:59:11.0 +0100
 +++ gaim-0.72-1mdk.src.rpm/gaim.spec  2003-11-05 11:59:11.0 +0100
 @@ -19,8 +22,7 @@
  Source:  http://download.sourceforge.net/gaim/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2
  Source1: %{name}_icons.tar.bz2
  Source2: %{name}-encryption-%{encrypt_version}.tar.bz2
 -Patch0:  %{name}-0.60-smiley-2.patch.bz2
 -Patch1:  gaim-0.68-64bit-fixes.patch.bz2
 +Patch0:  %{name}-0.71-smiley.patch.bz2
  
  BuildRequires:   autoconf2.5
  BuildRequires:   automake1.7
 @@ -81,8 +83,7 @@
  %prep
  
  %setup -q
 -%patch0 -p1 -b .smiley
 -%patch1 -p1 -b .64bit-fixes
 +%patch0 -b .smiley
  
  tar --bzip2 -xf %{SOURCE1}
  tar --bzip2 -xf %{SOURCE2}
 @@ -139,7 +140,6 @@
  
  # remove files not bundled
  rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/gaim/*.la
 -rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_prefix}/lib/perl5/

  %changelog
 -* Tue Oct 21 2003 Gwenole Beauchesne [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0.68-2mdk
 -- 64-bit  deps fixes
 -- nuke unpackaged files
 +* Wed Nov 05 2003 Laurent Culioli [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0.72-1mdk
 +- gaim 0.72
 +- gaim-encryption 2.16
 +
 +* Thu Oct 16 2003 Laurent Culioli [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0.71-1mdk
 +- gaim 0.71 
 +- gaim-encryption 2.15
 +- regenerate smiley patch
  
  * Wed Sep 03 2003 Laurent Culioli [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0.68-1mdk
 +- fix encryption compilation
 +- add some perl files
  - gaim 0.68
  - gaim-encryption 2.10
  
 
 




[Cooker] Re: Users on do we need 2.6 in Mandrake

2003-11-04 Thread David Walser
We should use 2.6 if it's stable.  Right now, it can't handle low memory situations to 
save its life.

Andrey Borzenkov  wrote:
 Just hit the following on a.o.l.m:
 
 8.2 was one of the most rock-solid Linux distros ever.  Unless you feel
 you need some program or functionality you can't get in 8.2, I'd stay
 with it instead of upgrading until the 10.0 release with the 2.6 kernel

 is released in about 6 months.
 
 oh, well ... :)




[Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] kdeedu-3.1.93-2mdk

2003-11-04 Thread David Walser
With the opening of Cooker I've seen this with at least one other package too, we need 
to be careful not to trample changes that have been made since 9.2 was first cut.

Laurent MONTEL wrote:
 -=-=-=-
 Name: kdeedu   Relocations: (not relocateable)
 Version : 3.1.93Vendor: MandrakeSoft
 Release : 2mdk  Build Date: Sat Nov  1 21:20:05 2003

[...]

  %changelog
 -* Fri Oct 31 2003 Jean-Michel Dault [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3.1.3-10mdk
 -- add png icons for kvoctrain
 -- menu entries require only x11 since many schools use icewm but
 -  still want to run these kde apps
 +* Mon Nov 03 2003 Laurent MONTEL [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3.1.93-2mdk
 +- Port to Vfolder



[Cooker] Mozilla-1.5-0.92mdk Stability

2003-11-03 Thread David Coe
I mentioned in an earlier thread that I was having problems with the
Mozilla-1.5-0.92mdk placed in the MandrakeClub archive, in particular,
that pressing the Mail icon on the Browser Status Bar (down at the
bottom left-hand corner) quite often resulted in an unceremonious
closedown of all Mozilla windows.
This bug had been *very* noticeable with Chip Cuccio's first offering of
Mozilla-1.5 on his NORLUG archive (I can't speak for the second), was
sporadically present with Buchan Milne / Fred Crozat's MandrakeClub RPM
and was absent (as far as I can tell) from Scott Bolander's XFT-enabled
tarball.
About:buildconfig shows all the variants to have really quite different
compiler and configuration switches and, as a non-Mozzy guru, it's a
little difficult for me to pin down whether this is an error/feature in
Mozilla or its build environment. A first local rebuild on a clean MDK
9.2 with current updates produced identical behaviour. So far, so good!
However, in looking for likely clues in Buchan's configuration, my eye
was caught by the pthread stuff: the presence of -pthread in the
compiler option list, and presence of --without-system-nspr and absence
of --with-pthreads in the configure arguments. Hmmm ... thinks ...
popped the --with-pthreads into the spec file ... set the rebuild going
... went to bed.
Today (OK, OK, it's not the fastest of Athlons), the bunch of RPMS were
waiting for me, a quick rpm -Fvh and bingo - it now seems stable. Could 
you give the addition a whirl next time you rebuild (for mandrakeclub or 
cooker). Perhaps the list can comment if the bad bits pop up elsewhere!

On a minor issue, I did notice that the mozilla-irc rpm doesn't put a 
Mozilla Chat item in the menu. Is this deliberate?

Many thanks good people!

David




[Cooker] Re: New mailing list for server topics

2003-11-03 Thread David Walser
Is the new list going to be available through gmane (I know you don't control this) ?

Warly wrote:
 
 http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/twiki/bin/view/Main/MailingListHowTo
 





[Cooker] Re: TUX?

2003-11-03 Thread David Walser
That was khttpd, and it didn't suck, it just wasn't being maintained in 2.5.

Diego Iastrubni wrote:
 if i am not mistaking, it was removed in 2.6 since it sux ass so much.
 
 why would you need that? http in user mode is good enough.
 
  ?, 2 ??? 2003, 18:03,  ?? ??? Oden Eriksson:
 Hi.

 I asked to have TUX included before but it was decided not to use the patch
 because security considerations. But now there's new times with zillions of
 kernels laying around. So, maybe Thomas or some one else would consider
 implementing TUX into a new server oriented kernel?

 http://freshmeat.net/branches/45229/

 I tried to use the update 9.2 kernel but got rejects, this is simply too
 time consuming for me.

 So whatcha say?
 
 
 





Re: [Cooker] Mozilla-1.5-0.92mdk Stability

2003-11-03 Thread David Coe
Frederic Crozat wrote:
On Mon, 03 Nov 2003 08:34:50 +, David Coe wrote:


I mentioned in an earlier thread that I was having problems with the
Mozilla-1.5-0.92mdk placed in the MandrakeClub archive, in particular,
that pressing the Mail icon on the Browser Status Bar (down at the
bottom left-hand corner) quite often resulted in an unceremonious
closedown of all Mozilla windows.
This bug had been *very* noticeable with Chip Cuccio's first offering of
Mozilla-1.5 on his NORLUG archive (I can't speak for the second), was
sporadically present with Buchan Milne / Fred Crozat's MandrakeClub RPM
and was absent (as far as I can tell) from Scott Bolander's XFT-enabled
tarball.


I'm going to be a little rude but let's explain this clearly : I DON'T
maintain Mandrake Club RPMs (I didn't upload nor check them) and I DON'T
want to hear from them, specially on cooker mailing list.. I NEVER did
those packages. The only package I maintain are on cooker. 
That's fine, Frederik. I have assumed your interest as your name 
features extremely prominently (as apparent maintainer) in the rpm 
changelog.

I appear to have strayed (by accident) into some internal Mandrake 
politics. My apologies!

David Coe




Re: [Cooker] Mozilla-1.5-0.92mdk Stability

2003-11-03 Thread David Coe
Buchan Milne wrote:

David, do you get the same problem when you use CTRL-2 or
Window-MailNewsgroups ?
The same problem which ever way is used to launch Mail.

BTW, on my cooker box (which has been running 1.5-0.92mdk for a week), I
start mozilla with the mail component first, and usually use the
keyboard shortcuts for the window I want to open, instead of the icons.
But it has been extremely stable (only one crash and that was testing
the mail icon).
It is indeed sporadic - so much so that I can not yet be fully sure that 
--with-pthreads has corrected the problem. Nonetheless, 1 in 20 requires 
caution and evasive action from the user.

I have been running 1.5-0.91mdk on my 9.1 box at home for almost 2 weeks
now, also with no problems.
Can't comment, although Mozilla's own tarball was also fine.

David




Re: [Cooker] Mozilla-1.5-0.92mdk Stability

2003-11-03 Thread David Coe
Brook Humphrey wrote:

You know I run [EMAIL PROTECTED] clients on some machines and we had a similar 
problem. What we found was that some very specific sse optimizations would 
cause issues on only some athlons. Mostly the thourobred b's and bartons. I'm 
not sure the reason you are seeing this and it only occurred when pushing the 
cpu's very hard. 
Ah .. the [EMAIL PROTECTED] that was (or still is).

I also know since i have started rebuilding the mandrake rpm's with some 
extreme optimizations that I do not see this behavior at all on my mandrake 
boxen. However I have had issues with the mandrake builds of mozilla for 
about 2 years now they just randomly lock up, completely crash, or the one 
that really bugs me is that after a while of use it gets so that you can not 
select text in the address bar. You have to shut it down to fix this. Because 
of this I almost never use the mandrake rpm's for mozilla. 
I did wonder about athlons and the degree of optimization. I recall the 
same scenario at MDK 9.1 release time. Buchan's early-bird Mozilla 1.3 
migrated to cooker AFAIR mainly with -O3 moved back to -O2 and what felt 
like a drop in stability. The abrupt closure I see, the lock-up rather 
rarely and the loss of text selection not at all.

My regular usage is to have 1 or 2 mozilla windows open with maybe 10 or 15 
tabs per window. This I have running for possibly weeks. With the mandrake 
builds I get maybe 3 or 4 days max.
That sounds like you're dispensing with xft and/or using Mozilla's own 
binaries. Fortunately (like OO.o) installation is very easy :-).

David






Re: [Cooker] Mozilla-1.5-0.92mdk Stability

2003-11-03 Thread David Coe
Brook Humphrey wrote:

well here are the flags I'm playing with now.

optflags: athlon -O3 -funroll-loops -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe 
-march=athlon-xp -ffast-math -fno-strength-reduce  -fforce-addr -m3dnow -msse 
-mfpmath=sse,387 -mmmx -frerun-cse-after-loop -frerun-loop-opt 
-falign-functions=4 -maccumulate-outgoing-args -fprefetch-loop-arrays

out of those the -O3 and --march=athlon-xp will give the biggest boost. and 
these can not be used for everything. glibc had to be backed off some bug gcc 
compiled fine. xfree had to be backed off some also but qt compiles fine with 
these. It is much snappier on my athlon machine I'm slowly working on more 
things. KDE is next and possibly the kernel but i dont really feel like 
playing with the kernel rpm much.
Many thanks - I'll try feeding a subset of those into rpmrc. Sometimes I 
do wonder how many days of optimising rebuild == an adm64. Still, that 
route will have other problems in tow. Sigh ...

My regular usage is to have 1 or 2 mozilla windows open with maybe 10 or
15 tabs per window. This I have running for possibly weeks. With the
mandrake builds I get maybe 3 or 4 days max.
That sounds like you're dispensing with xft and/or using Mozilla's own
binaries. Fortunately (like OO.o) installation is very easy :-).


yes I am and I tell you what I miss xft very much. Jaggy mozilla is no fun. I 
have also been playing with the custom builds of thunderbird and firebird 
from mozillazine. These are done by others in the community. They run very 
nice.
Yes, and come out very quickly.

David




Re: [Cooker] Mozilla-1.5-0.92mdk Stability

2003-11-03 Thread David Coe
Rolf Pedersen wrote:

Anytime I get a crash with the mail component of mozilla, I delete 
XUL.mfasl from my .mozilla profile.  Wonder if this is related. 
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=168516
I think I remember this one from Mozilla 1.1 days - AFAIR a crash in 
Mail followed by failure to restart unless XUL.mfasl was deleted. My 
feeling is it's something different, but I'll keep it in mind.

Anyway, so far so good with --with-pthreads (but I don't understand it).

David




Re: [Cooker] When can we finally get X to fall back to XFdrake??

2003-10-30 Thread David Sansome
On Tuesday 21 Oct 2003 7:42 pm, Buchan Milne wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 A long time ago, X used to fall back to running a configuration tool.
 This may have been long ago, when XFdrake wstill had a link for
 XF86configure (or whatever Redhat used to call their tool).

I think the best option here would be to do something similar with the display 
drivers as is done with the resoultions - ie. specify 3 or 4 in XF86Config-4, 
and get X to try them in order.  So for an nvidia card you could have...

Driver nvidia nv vesa

It would try the non-free driver first, then the 2D one, and fall back to vesa 
if neither are available.

Obviously this would require a patch to X...

David Sansome




Re: [Cooker] New ISO with updates

2003-10-29 Thread David Coe
Emmanuel Moll wrote:
I'm using chrips' from http://norlug.org/~chipster/index.pxml?rpms

Manu
I have noticed the norlug mozilla-1.5-1 bombs reliably on 9.2 when mail 
is called from the browser status bar. I'd better let chipster know :-).




Re: [Cooker] New ISO with updates

2003-10-29 Thread David Coe
Buchan Milne wrote:
David Coe wrote:

Emmanuel Moll wrote:


I'm using chrips' from http://norlug.org/~chipster/index.pxml?rpms

Manu
I have noticed the norlug mozilla-1.5-1 bombs reliably on 9.2 when mail
is called from the browser status bar. I'd better let chipster know :-).


Works fine in 1.5-0.92mdk:

http://mandrake.redbox.cz/Mandrake-devel/unsupported/MandrakeClub/9.2/i586/

Regards,
Buchan
So it does. I'd wondered where the ranger stuff had gone :-). Many thanks!




Re: [Cooker] New ISO with updates

2003-10-29 Thread David Coe
David Coe wrote:
Buchan Milne wrote:

David Coe wrote:

Emmanuel Moll wrote:


I'm using chrips' from http://norlug.org/~chipster/index.pxml?rpms

Manu


I have noticed the norlug mozilla-1.5-1 bombs reliably on 9.2 when mail
is called from the browser status bar. I'd better let chipster know :-).


Works fine in 1.5-0.92mdk:

http://mandrake.redbox.cz/Mandrake-devel/unsupported/MandrakeClub/9.2/i586/ 

Regards,
Buchan


So it does. I'd wondered where the ranger stuff had gone :-). Many thanks!
Oops .. I spoke too soon :-(. Mozilla 1.5-0.92mdk also bombs as above; 
not every time, but often enough to discourage accessing it via the mail 
button on the browser status bar. I'll try one of the Xft-enabled binary 
tar bundles and check the bugzilla reports.

Best wishes
David



[Cooker] Re: Duplicate packages in current cooker tree

2003-10-27 Thread David Walser
And now you can add these to the (contrib) list:
OpenGroupware.org-1.0-2mdk.noarch.rpm
OpenGroupware.org-1.0-5mdk.noarch.rpm

David Walser wrote:
 There are some packages that have more than one
 version sitting on the mirrors right now:
 
 in contrib:
 bugzilla-2.16.3-4mdk.noarch.rpm
 bugzilla-2.16.3-5mdk.noarch.rpm
 PHP-nuke-6.0-4mdk.noarch.rpm
 PHP-nuke-6.9-1mdk.noarch.rpm
 horde-2.2.4-1mdk.noarch.rpm
 horde2-2.2.3-2mdk.noarch.rpm
 
 in main:
 draksync-9.0-3mdk.noarch.rpm
 draksync-9.0-4mdk.noarch.rpm
 terminal-server-1.5-11mdk.noarch.rpm
 terminal-server-1.5-12mdk.noarch.rpm
 
 
 __
 Do you Yahoo!?
 Exclusive Video Premiere - Britney Spears
 http://launch.yahoo.com/promos/britneyspears/
 
 





[Cooker] Duplicate packages in current cooker tree

2003-10-25 Thread David Walser
There are some packages that have more than one
version sitting on the mirrors right now:

in contrib:
bugzilla-2.16.3-4mdk.noarch.rpm
bugzilla-2.16.3-5mdk.noarch.rpm
PHP-nuke-6.0-4mdk.noarch.rpm
PHP-nuke-6.9-1mdk.noarch.rpm
horde-2.2.4-1mdk.noarch.rpm
horde2-2.2.3-2mdk.noarch.rpm

in main:
draksync-9.0-3mdk.noarch.rpm
draksync-9.0-4mdk.noarch.rpm
terminal-server-1.5-11mdk.noarch.rpm
terminal-server-1.5-12mdk.noarch.rpm


__
Do you Yahoo!?
Exclusive Video Premiere - Britney Spears
http://launch.yahoo.com/promos/britneyspears/



[Cooker] Re: LG Drives

2003-10-25 Thread David Walser
Juan Quintela wrote:
 marc == Marc Guise [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 marc I read the post about Mdk 9.2 and LG on mandrakeusers.org. I have cd-rw drive, 
 marc model HL-DT-ST GCE 8400b and I have Mdk 9.2rc2 running. There are no problems 
 marc with my LG drive
 
 21mdk just updated (vdanen should be doing the official update) fixes
 that problem.  Only LG plain CD-ROMS are affected.
 
 Later, Juan.

A friend of mine asked to ask if the 2.6 kernel is affected by this.




Re: [Cooker] Huge List of Updates

2003-10-23 Thread David Coe
Brad Felmey wrote:
On Wed, 2003-10-22 at 20:03, Galileo wrote:

Another proof that Mandrake releases unfinished products.
http://www.mandrakesecure.net/en/advisories/advisory.php?name=MDKA-2003:020
More that 250 MB of updates excluding SRPMS. How the hell did this
happen ?
It looks like x.2 doesn't mean a thing anymore. 7.2 and 8.2 were
perfect. Why isn't so with 9.2 ?


You, my fine feathered friend, are full of foo.
He's making a very valid point. If MS did it, the press would (rightly) 
give stick.

7.2 and 8.2 were decent, but not perfect. 9.2 even needing the updates
is a heck of a lot better than either 7.2 or 8.2. I know - I've used
every Mandrake since 5/6 and run cooker since 7.1.
Quite true. The components (the community) and the package integration 
(Mandrake developers) are getting more and more attractive.

They could always be like SuSE or RedHat and consider non-security
bugfixes and updates to be next point release. Mandrake is bending over
backwards. Schedules have to be kept, but they didn't quit working when
it was cut - they kept at it to make a good product even better.
Getting the balance right between QA and the release schedule is the 
name of the game. Stray too far either way and you're history.

Why on earth are you complaining, then?
If I had just installed a site-full of Mandrake 9.2 workstations, I 
would be less than impressed to have this size of update to do so soon 
after.




[Cooker] Re: Terminal button doesn't work in ICEWM

2003-10-23 Thread David Walser
Vincent Meyer, MD wrote:
 Since KDE is broken, am temporarily using ICEWM.  At the bottom of the screen 
 is the menu button, Terminal button, and Mozilla button.  Terminal button 
 doesn't bring up a terminal window, although there is some disk activity.
 
 V.

What does your xvt alternative point to?  If it's konsole, it could be the same KDE 
problem chasing you around.

Another good reason konsole shouldn't take precedence in the alternatives above rxvt.




[Cooker] Re: Mandrake uses Photoshop... What a pity!

2003-10-22 Thread David Walser
Mike wrote:
 The main things that I find bad about gimp (just my opinion, maybe im
 mad/doing it wrong)
 [...]
 3) In photoshop, if you need the zoom tool, you just press 'Z' crop is
 another one key shortcut.  In gimp the same operation involves several
 clicks to cycle through each window (click main window, click zoom,
 click brush options, click 'allow to resize window', then you can use
 the tool)

That's not true.  I'm working from memory here, but I think zoom in and out are = and -




Re: [Cooker] Broken KDE in Cooker

2003-10-22 Thread David Kobler
Can't we just set a simple standard to TEST YOUR PACKAGES before uploading
them.  It seems that simple things are constantly ignored by those who
maintain the cooker RPMS.   How hard would it be to test your rpms on a
recently installed cooker box before uploading them?  This would allow
people to test cooker for system specific bugs instead of distribution
specific bugs that exist because people do not do BASIC testing.

 I'd just like to confirm that this works

 I couldn't get 3.2 to work at all :(

 Mike

 FACORAT Fabrice wrote:

Le mer 22/10/2003 à 11:22, Robert Fox a écrit :


On Wed, 2003-10-22 at 15:18, FACORAT Fabrice wrote:


Le mer 22/10/2003 à 10:23, Michael Lothian a écrit :


I'm my fustration I've decided to switch to kde3.2 alpha 2 from

http://peoples.mandrakesoft.com/~lmontel/kde-3.2-alpha2/
 http://peoples.mandrakesoft.com/%7Elmontel/kde-3.2-alpha2/

I think it at least works a bit, which wouldbe an improvement of it
 not working at all


or he can grab qt 3.2 from there



Won't that break something else?



sure ... don't know, should give this a try ...

---
Quand la loi et le devoir ne font qu'un sans la religion, nul n'est plus
vraiment un moins qu'un individu. Frank Herbert, Dune.









Re: [Cooker] Broken KDE in Cooker

2003-10-22 Thread David Kobler
Can't we just set a simple standard to TEST YOUR PACKAGES before uploading
them.  It seems that simple things are constantly ignored by those who
maintain the cooker RPMS.   How hard would it be to test your rpms on a
recently installed cooker box before uploading them?  This would allow
people to test cooker for system specific bugs instead of distribution
specific bugs that exist because people do not do BASIC testing.

 I'd just like to confirm that this works

 I couldn't get 3.2 to work at all :(

 Mike

 FACORAT Fabrice wrote:

Le mer 22/10/2003 à 11:22, Robert Fox a écrit :


On Wed, 2003-10-22 at 15:18, FACORAT Fabrice wrote:


Le mer 22/10/2003 à 10:23, Michael Lothian a écrit :


I'm my fustration I've decided to switch to kde3.2 alpha 2 from

http://peoples.mandrakesoft.com/~lmontel/kde-3.2-alpha2/
 http://peoples.mandrakesoft.com/%7Elmontel/kde-3.2-alpha2/

I think it at least works a bit, which wouldbe an improvement of it
 not working at all


or he can grab qt 3.2 from there



Won't that break something else?



sure ... don't know, should give this a try ...

---
Quand la loi et le devoir ne font qu'un sans la religion, nul n'est plus
vraiment un moins qu'un individu. Frank Herbert, Dune.









Re: [Cooker] Mozilla Thunderbird not on cooker

2003-10-21 Thread David Coe
Buchan Milne wrote:

BTW, I also have mozilla-1.5 packages built for Mandrake Club for 9.2,
which are just waiting for the admin to get the permissions right on the
upload server for 9.2, the 9.1 packages are in testing.
I did notice the mozilla-1.5 packages up on ranger but alas without the 
corresponding lib files. You couldn't put them up and/or the spec file?

Best wishes

David




Re: [Cooker] DRI and MDK

2003-10-20 Thread David Coe
guran wrote:

This is from a mail on expert, 
http://archives.mandrakelinux.com/expert/2003-10/msg01537.php

When I look at Slackware 9.1 and /etc/X11/XF86Config I have:
...
# This loads the GLX module
Load   glx
# This loads the DRI module
Load   dri

Why do Mdk have DRI excluded?
I'm not sure they do. Out of the box 9.1 placed this in XF86Config for 
my Athlon + ATI Rage Pro. It seems to run as expected. Did you ask for 
3D acceleration during display configuration?

Section Module
Load dbe # Double-Buffering Extension
Load extmod
Load type1
Load freetype
Load glx # 3D layer
Load dri # direct rendering
EndSection
Section DRI
Mode 0666
EndSection




[Cooker] Re: Re: 9.2 disasters list (continuing)

2003-10-20 Thread David Walser
Brook Humphrey wrote:
 On Sunday 19 October 2003 01:29 am, David Walser wrote:
 Brook Humphrey wrote:
  Ouch. What's taking so much space?
 
  stupid emacs and xemacs and all the assorted packages. No real users use
  these

 Well you can't not have emacs, but I agree we could ditch xemacs.  The only
 reason for ever having it was syntax highlighting in the nice GUI, and
 regular emacs has had syntax highlight support even in the console since
 21.1, so there's no reason to even use a GUI now.

  out there it is more of a developer odity (as not all developers use this
  thing either). Not only that but truly useful packages such as midnight
  commander (when I select console tools) and gvim are not even installed.
  I'm

 LOL, those are the oddities.  I guarantee those have significantly fewer
 users.

  not sure if they are even on the cd's as I havn't even managed to get
  them downloaded yet and am still using my custom cd's from cooker after
  it was frozen for the cd's. These two are only about 5 or 6 megs together
  at the most compared to probably close to 100 megs for emacs including
  all it's assorted packages.
 
  I am not a vim versus emacs person really but I do have a few 150 meg
  text files I open and read at times and vim is the only thing under linux
  that even manages to open the file relatively well. Everything else gets
  dicy at about 80megs. Emacs wont even begin to touch the thing. The only
  other program i have found to open it with is a little windows text
  editor that is not free. I think it was texedit.

 Did you try the MS-DOS Editor?
 
 
 you are very sadly mistaken here. The majority or regular windows converts 
 could care less about about emacs. Much less would they be able to figure out 

Sorry Brook, you're way off.  I was a Windows convert many years ago, and emacs was 
the only text editor that I 1) cared about and 2) could figure out.  Without emacs I 
would have missed the MS-DOS Editor way too much.

 how to use the thing properly.  AS for mc every sysadmin I show it to uses 
 it. It is way more useful in the real world than emacs. Especially for system 
 recovery. It is kind of like an all in one tool for when things go bad. I 
 even use it allot under normal conditions to install rpm's. Especially when 
 the system is hosed and there is not other way to install them. Emacs will 
 not do that for me.

That's your fault, not its.  And we're comparing a text editor to a file manager 
anyway?




[Cooker] Re: Re: 9.2 disasters list (continuing)

2003-10-20 Thread David Walser
Robert L Martin wrote:

 On Sunday 19 October 2003 12:23 pm, Götz Waschk wrote:
 Who's more important, the stupid windows convert, or the developer? If
 you remove emacs from the CD, you'll scare of the developers. No
 developers means no new software. BTW it's not emacs that is growing
 and growing and taking away the CD space but the new generations of
 GUI software, especially KDE.
 
 
 Oh i would say the stupid Windows converts as far as The Big I$$ue goes
 besides most developers if they found something missing they would 
 1 compile it from source
 2 have an older version lying about
 3 download the package from an ftp server

4 - switch to Gentoo

But one thing you all are losing in this discussion...emacs isn't only used by 
developers.  It's also used by sysadmins!  Every system needs a sysadmin.




[Cooker] Re: 9.2 disasters list (continuing)

2003-10-19 Thread David Walser
Brook Humphrey wrote:
 Ouch. What's taking so much space?
 
 stupid emacs and xemacs and all the assorted packages. No real users use these 

Well you can't not have emacs, but I agree we could ditch xemacs.  The only reason for 
ever having it was syntax highlighting in the nice GUI, and regular emacs has had 
syntax highlight support even in the console since 21.1, so there's no reason to even 
use a GUI now.

 out there it is more of a developer odity (as not all developers use this 
 thing either). Not only that but truly useful packages such as midnight 
 commander (when I select console tools) and gvim are not even installed. I'm 

LOL, those are the oddities.  I guarantee those have significantly fewer users.

 not sure if they are even on the cd's as I havn't even managed to get them 
 downloaded yet and am still using my custom cd's from cooker after it was 
 frozen for the cd's. These two are only about 5 or 6 megs together at the 
 most compared to probably close to 100 megs for emacs including all it's 
 assorted packages.
 
 I am not a vim versus emacs person really but I do have a few 150 meg text 
 files I open and read at times and vim is the only thing under linux that 
 even manages to open the file relatively well. Everything else gets dicy at 
 about 80megs. Emacs wont even begin to touch the thing. The only other 
 program i have found to open it with is a little windows text editor that is 
 not free. I think it was texedit.

Did you try the MS-DOS Editor?




[Cooker] [Bug 6165] [rhythmbox] Freeze when adding after delete all

2003-10-19 Thread [david]
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6165





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-19-10 18:36 ---
My system is a 9.1 updated to cooker three weeks ago and to 9.2 this week. 

To reproduce the bug:
1) Add some files.
2) Select All in Artist and All in Albums. Select all with ctrl+a.
3) Delete it.
4) Add some directory.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


--- Reminder: ---
assigned_to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
status: NEEDINFO
creation_date: 
description: 
When delete all songs in the Library, and try to add another source of songs,
the application freeze when click on the ok button of the file dialog. 

In the console it's put:

** (rhythmbox:7559): WARNING **: FIXME: guard from double entry



[Cooker] [Bug 6165] [rhythmbox] Freeze when adding after delete all

2003-10-19 Thread [david]
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6165


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
 Resolution||INVALID




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-19-10 22:29 ---
I have installed some libs that the update failed (pcre, libdha and
libpostproc0) and the bug seems to go away... :?

set it as invalid.

Thanks

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


--- Reminder: ---
assigned_to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
status: RESOLVED
creation_date: 
description: 
When delete all songs in the Library, and try to add another source of songs,
the application freeze when click on the ok button of the file dialog. 

In the console it's put:

** (rhythmbox:7559): WARNING **: FIXME: guard from double entry



[Cooker] [Bug 6165] [rhythmbox] New: Freeze when adding after delete all

2003-10-18 Thread [david]
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6165

   Product: rhythmbox
 Component: rhythmbox
   Summary: Freeze when adding after delete all
   Product: rhythmbox
   Version: 0.5.3-1mdk
  Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: major
  Priority: P2
 Component: rhythmbox
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


When delete all songs in the Library, and try to add another source of songs,
the application freeze when click on the ok button of the file dialog. 

In the console it's put:

** (rhythmbox:7559): WARNING **: FIXME: guard from double entry

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



[Cooker] megaraid driver

2003-10-16 Thread David Kobler
I am having some trouble with my dell poweredge 1600sc.  I have a megaraid
controller in it.  After installing mandrake 9.1 and mandrake 9.2 I have
periodic lock-ups.  After using the 2.6 test kernel all seems to be well. 
For some reason it seems that the default 9.x kernels use the old v1
megaraid drivers and the 2.6 test kernels use the v2 driver.

How can I switch over to the megaraid 2 drivers using the 2.4.22 kernels
or can someone upgrade the driver so the default megaraid driver in the
2.4.22 kernel is the latest v2 driver



[Cooker] Re: 9.2 - disaster already? Older server scsi problems

2003-10-16 Thread David Walser
Brook Humphrey wrote:
 On Thursday 16 October 2003 08:37 am, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
 Ron Stodden [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  Oddly, installing all the 9.2 updates solved all problems
  (although there is no apparent reason why in the explains of the
  RPMs involved).

 There seems there is still an odd locking problem when we
 launch update-menus from within %post scriptlet of an RPM
 (problems arises from the fact update-menus do itself an rpm
 call, rpm -qa), flepied spent a large amount of time trying to
 fix that before 9.2, actually had some success with some
 scenarios, thought he caught all of them, but apparently not
 really all, the problem being that it's very rare here and
 absolutely not reproductible :/.

 If *anyone* can reproduce it, please post here the steps to
 reproduce it, I'm sure we can come up with a fix quickly. But
 without it, it's a hell to debug.

 A workaround is to launch update-menus as root.
 
 
 I'll see what I can do maybe you guys dont use kde. but in at least 3 or 4 
 fresh installs when ever you install any package with a menu for kde this 
 happens. It does fine if you get them all during install but if you install 
 any kde apps after the os is installed this happens as well as all the icons 
 missing off kicker. It is rather annoying.

Aha, maybe that's just the problem!  KDE caches the menu; I believe 60 seconds by 
default.  So you have to not look at the menu for 60 seconds, or log out and in and 
the menu should appear OK again.




[Cooker] Re: Demo site OLD

2003-10-14 Thread David Walser
I agree that would be nice, but that would require MDK to re-hire the guy that made 
the Demo section, which would require money...

Robert Fox wrote:
 Congratulations on the official release of 9.2 - the best distro
 available to date!
 
 Could someone please eventually update the demo site from the main
 Mandrake website . . . it's rather embarrassing when it says:
 
 
 Welcome to the Demo and Tutorial Center.
 
 Sept. 25, 2002 -- Mandrake Linux 9.0 released!
 Take a graphical tour of Mandrake 9.0 in the Demo section; try several
 beginner's lessons in the Tutorial area; and check the Spotlight
 section for in-depth reviews of some special applications.
 
 
 I wish Mandrake the best of success with this new flagship product!!
 
 R.Fox
 





[Cooker] Re: Mirror dope

2003-10-13 Thread David Walser
Olivier Thauvin wrote:
 The main problem is that I never really know if I am really in sync.
 Please no advice about rsync or timefuzz.
 
 Learn how to use rsync:

Why?  rsync is confusing and hard to learn.  Part of the problem is that every person 
that posts and example use uses different options.

Just use rpmsync.  It does even more for you than rsync itself, and you don't have to 
worry about how to use rsync.

 rsync -aqH --bwlimit=SPEED_kB --no-whole-file server::share/ /my_mirror/
 look --exclude option too.
 
 I really don't think fmirror is better than rsync, because is able to check 
 more things about files which need to be sync. Moreover, if a file need to be 
 resync, rsync will download only difference by looking md5sums.
 





[Cooker] Re: Re: Mirror dope

2003-10-13 Thread David Walser
Olivier Thauvin wrote:
 Le Lundi 13 Octobre 2003 11:08, David Walser a écrit :
 Olivier Thauvin wrote:
  The main problem is that I never really know if I am really in sync.
  Please no advice about rsync or timefuzz.
 
  Learn how to use rsync:

 Why?  rsync is confusing and hard to learn.  Part of the problem is that
 every person that posts and example use uses different options.
 
 I will loose my time by using rpmsync, I need to mirror ppc/sparc/i586. I 
 never seen a script on this list which take care of hard link, and mirror all 
 archs.

rpmsync can mirror all arches, I made sure of that.

If rsync needs the -H option to work where you're using it, just add it to the 
$rsync_short_args variable definition (line 155).

 rsync is not hard to use:
 
 -a make a full mirror
 -q quiet
 -H preserve hard link
 --no-whole-file take identical part of file from local disk.
 
 What is hard in those options ?

Nothing by themselves, just that it's a different set everytime someone says on this 
list how to use rsync.

 Just use rpmsync.  It does even more for you than rsync itself, and you
 don't have to worry about how to use rsync.




[Cooker] Re: perl automatic provides again

2003-10-05 Thread David Walser
Luca Berra wrote:
 On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 04:54:07PM +0200, Luca Berra wrote:
hi,
today i found two packages that provide half of perl.

psad-1.2.3-1mdl from contrib and
wml-2.0.9 from MAIN  
 
 A fix for this kind of problems could be having perl autoprovides
 generated only for files in default @INC, but it would create
 problems for packages that require modules in other places.
 also modifying the autorequire script not to issue requires for modules
 that are provided by files anywhere in the package
 
 i still believe that psad and wml are broken, they should not include
 perl modules that are provided in their own package.

Yes, and sitescooper (from contrib) was similarly broken (providing perl modules it 
shouldn't have been).  I can't remember if it was fixed or not.




[Cooker] Re: And next ?

2003-09-30 Thread David Walser
Laurent Montel wrote:
 And splitting a single application (kopete and others) into 3-4 seperate
 rpms just doesnt make sense.
 
 Why ?
 Do you know libification ?

Is it necessary when nothing besides that single app is ever going to use the library?




[Cooker] SUB cooker

2003-09-30 Thread David





[Cooker] Re: Re: And next ?

2003-09-30 Thread David Walser
Marcel Pol wrote:
 On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 06:07:50 -0400
 David Walser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Laurent Montel wrote:
  And splitting a single application (kopete and others) into 3-4 seperate
  rpms just doesnt make sense.
  
  Why ?
  Do you know libification ?
 
 Is it necessary when nothing besides that single app is ever going to use
 the library?
 
 I think yes. On amd-64 the library packages will be named different
 (libkopete1 vs something like libkopete1-64), and the file locations will be
 different as well (/usr/lib vs /usr/lib64), so splitting the libraries and
 binaries (/usr/bin) is a good thing.

Why?  Is somebody going to want to install 32-bit and 64-bit versions of the kopete 
library on their machine?




[Cooker] Re: YEAH ITS THE FUNNIEST DAMN THING SINCE THIS SIDE OF THE STATES EH?

2003-09-30 Thread David Walser
Jason M. Randle wrote:
 HAHA JOHN ALLEN YOU THINK?? NOW YOU GET A COOKIE 
 
 John Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:On Tuesday 30 September 2003 04:12, Jason M. 
 Randle wrote:
 TYPCIAL ASSHOLES!

 
 Yes you are aren't you.
 --
 The thing about the good old days is that you seldom recognize them when   you are 
 in them. They are most clearly seen in hindsight. Most clearly seen after they are 
 gone

Hmm, I guess he'll miss this list once he finally gets removed from it.





[Cooker] Re: And next ?

2003-09-29 Thread David Walser
Vox wrote:
   Tho, since we are talking about the mailing listscould we
   *please* get rid of sympa and start using mailman or any other
   *decent* mailing list software? Sympa has proved over and over and
   over again that it can't deal with the mandrake mailing lists and
   that it should be shot.
 
   So...can we please get a good mailing list software managing the
   lists?

Can Mailman be configured to correctly set the reply-to to the list?  I hate being on 
mailman lists, they're such a pain.

What about majordomo?




[Cooker] Re: And next ?

2003-09-28 Thread David Walser
Warly wrote:
 It may be a good idea, before cooker opens again, to take these days to
 have some brainstorm.
 
 May you give your opinion on :
 
 - What was wrong in 9.2 development process?

the mirror situation, of course

Also, a lot of MDK developers got heavy into bugfixing the last couple weeks before 
release, and they weren't done when we cut the release.

They should have started earlier.

 - We though a bit late in the 9.2 developement process to split cooker ml, we
 should do it now.

As long as each sublist is available as a newsgroup (be it gmane or whatever).

 - What could we do to improve 9.3/10.0 development.

I think for 9.3 we need to focus on bugfixing and polishing.  The only major change 
should be the switch to the freedesktop.org menu system.  Other than that, there 
shouldn't be any major innovations, or overhauls (yet again) of DrakX.

One release cycle focusing on just making sure things work could go a long way to 
improve our image.

 - What should we do to improve the Wiki.

good question

 - Should we have cooker snapshot ISOs?

If they were only distributed with bittorrent, they wouldn't hurt anything.  I 
wouldn't have a need for them, but if others could use them, go for it.  I just 
wouldn't want too much additional load on the mirrors.  One nice thing about doing it 
is it would for you to keep mkcd working ;o)

 - What could we do, as a community, to increase the acceptance of mandrakelinux?

make it so things just work.

 - How to have more contributors?

Better docs, and reaching out to the fedora people for some collaboration.

 And anything related to the mandrakelinux distro.

Harness the power of the community to increase the visibility and support of contrib.




[Cooker] Re: Re: autoconf2.5.x problem

2003-09-25 Thread David Walser
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
 David Walser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 lamikr_mdk wrote:
  That helped.
  Do you know is there similar kind of environment variables for selecting 
  appropriate version of aclocal and automake?
 
 Well, for example, to compile giFT, I have to do this:
 
 WANT_AUTOCONF_2_5=1 AUTOMAKE=automake-1.7 AUTOHEADER=autoheader-2.5x 
 ACLOCAL=aclocal-1.7 ./autogen.sh
 ^^
 
 grmbl! don't call autoconf stuff by version name!

Don't yell at me, that's what I *had* to do to get giFT to work.




[Cooker] Re: bind-9.2.3-0.rc4.1mdk

2003-09-23 Thread David Walser
Oden Eriksson wrote:
 BIND 9.2.3rc4 is now available.
 [...]
 1509.   [bug]   Hint zones should accept delegation-only.  Forward
 zone should not accept delegation-only.
 
 1508.   [bug]   Don't apply delegation-only checks to answers from
 forwarders.

Does this mean that if I used forward only, and use my ISP's DNS servers as 
forwarders, none of this root-delegation-only stuff will work for me?




[Cooker] Re: Openoffice 1.1rc5

2003-09-23 Thread David Walser
Emmanuel wrote:
 Hello there,
 
 http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/packages/openoffice/stable/1.1rc5/
 
 Any chance of getting a quick compilation and making it into 9.2??? I 
 believe rc5 will be renamed 1.1 once it's propagated onto the mirrors 
 (based on the fact that SO7 is already out).
 
 Emmanuel

Quick compilation?  OO.o?  LOL!




[Cooker] Re: Re: bind-9.2.3-0.rc4.1mdk

2003-09-23 Thread David Walser
Oden Eriksson wrote:
 tisdagen den 23 september 2003 12.21 skrev David Walser:
 Oden Eriksson wrote:
  BIND 9.2.3rc4 is now available.
  [...]
  1509.   [bug]   Hint zones should accept delegation-only. 
  Forward zone should not accept delegation-only.
 
  1508.   [bug]   Don't apply delegation-only checks to answers
  from forwarders.

 Does this mean that if I used forward only, and use my ISP's DNS servers as
 forwarders, none of this root-delegation-only stuff will work for me?
 
 Ummm, I don't know, good question. I know that using forwarders the 
 delegation-only checks didn't work with rc3 (why would it?).

?  Why wouldn't it?




[Cooker] Re: autoconf2.5.x problem

2003-09-23 Thread David Walser
lamikr_mdk wrote:
 That helped.
 Do you know is there similar kind of environment variables for selecting 
 appropriate version of aclocal and automake?

Well, for example, to compile giFT, I have to do this:

WANT_AUTOCONF_2_5=1 AUTOMAKE=automake-1.7 AUTOHEADER=autoheader-2.5x 
ACLOCAL=aclocal-1.7 ./autogen.sh




[Cooker] Re: So, which is broken?

2003-09-22 Thread David Walser
Adam Williamson wrote:
 On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 20:52, Felix Miata wrote:
  
 Yes, I got that answer from irc://freenode/mandrake after someone there
 read my post here. It fixed it. But, it begs the question, why would the
 rpm db be corrupted on a week old install?
 
 One thing I've noticed that can cause it is ctrl-C'ing out of an urpmi
 at an inopportune moment. Have you aborted any urpm* / rpm operations in
 that week?

Maybe urpmi should trap that signal and make sure it cleans up properly before exiting.




[Cooker] Cooperation with RedHat Linux project?

2003-09-21 Thread David Walser
http://rhl.redhat.com/

From reading this, it sounds like the possibility of some cooperation between Cooker 
and the new RHL project is even more possible.

One possible goal could be making packages source compatible.  Differences in macros 
should be easy to smooth out, and the menu system shouldn't be an issue anymore once 
we all move to the freedesktop.org menu system.

Has anybody looked into this or tried contacting anybody at RHL?




[Cooker] Re: Cooperation with RedHat Linux project?

2003-09-21 Thread David Walser
Pierre Jarillon wrote:
 Le Dimanche 21 Septembre 2003 16:41, David Walser a écrit :
 http://rhl.redhat.com/

 From reading this, it sounds like the possibility of some cooperation
 between Cooker and the new RHL project is even more possible.
 
 RedHat said: We are excited to announce that we are working on an alliance 
 with another well-known provider of Red-Hat compatible packages. 
 
 I try  to guess who is this well-known provider of Red-Hat compatible 
 packages. IMHO, not so many !

freshrpms?




[Cooker] Re: Re: Draksync question / mirror for members

2003-09-18 Thread David Walser
John Keller wrote:

 David Walser wrote:
 Buchan Milne wrote:
  Vincent Meyer, MD wrote:
 
   Also, the server's built, the line is in, and would be nice to get
 this
  server up and available for use of fellow cookers here in North
  America.  If
  a graphic tool like Draksync won't do it, does anyone have a favorite
  mirroring script?
 
  # urpmi rpmsync
  ?

 Yes, please people, use the rpmsync package that's in contrib.  People are
 still grabbing cooksync off my webserver because the link is still in the
 wiki.  It should be referring to the rpmsync package now.
 
 I've removed the reference that I found and replaced it with a note about
 rpmsync:
 http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/twiki/bin/view/Main/CookerHowTo#From_a_Local_Mirror

good

 I'm afraid I don't know anything about this utility, or even if it's
 mentioned in the right spot on the page. If you or anyone else would like to
 add anything particular about it (instructions, whatever), just let me know.

What did it used to say?  rpmsync is just cooksync (the old link) with command-line 
argument support.

It shouldn't say Use fmirror or rsync to create a local mirror and keep it up to 
date.  Certainly it doesn't make a difference how you create the mirror (although 
rpmsync can handle that too), but definitely rpmsync should be used to keep it up to 
date.  The default settings in the script have it set to sync from uninett, and 
there's a README that comes with the package explaning how to set it up for Cooker (in 
which case you'd only need to change the remote mirror possibly and the local path).




[Cooker] Re: rxvt menu entry?

2003-09-17 Thread David Walser
Guillaume Rousse wrote:
 Ainsi parlait [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
  I plead for some sanity, please put the menu entry back in. Let the user
   that doesn't want a terminal remove the entry (it would give them an
  excuse to learn menudrake), and don't make the 99.99% of us who do want
  it have to load up menudrake just so we can gain access to a terminal.

yes

 How about a compromise? Put it in the Configuration menu (where it
 belongs). User terminals (gnome-terminal, konsole etc etc, can go in
 Terminals, but rxvt should only be needed for configuration work so that's
 where it belongs).

Well, I don't care so much, long as it's in the menu, but rxvt is a terminal like any 
other.  It's not just for configuration and it really makes no sense to segregate it 
from the others.

 And what about clearly labeling packages for which it is useless to ask 
 anything to maintainers, as they know better than anyone else what is good 
 for users, and they don't give a fuck about contributers ?

Seems that way sometimes.

 A new private section, similar to main and contrib, could host all those 
 packages, safe from hostile remarks and angry comments.

The more time I spend in the Cooker family, the more I see a need for this.




[Cooker] [Bug 2097] [drakxtools] NTFS partition is not recognized properly

2003-09-16 Thread [david]
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-16-09 14:42 ---
It's still valid. The bug is still there.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


--- Reminder: ---
assigned_to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
status: RESOLVED
creation_date: 
description: 
When installing RC1, and after completing the installation, diskdrake thought that 
/dev/hda1 was 
Hidden IFS (e.g. HPFS), and generated a fstab that would not allow the partition to 
be 
mounted.  By selecting NTFS in the fstab, the partition would mount and work properly. 
 
There was some discussion about NTFS being detected as HPFS before on the cooker list. 
 
This appaears to be neither detecting as NTFS or HPFS, but as some variant of HPFS.  
Since 
Windows XP generated the partition in question, this may be an issue for many first 
time users.



[Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] xmms-arts-0.6.0-1mdk

2003-09-16 Thread David Walser
So is the URL still correct, or no?

Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
 Name: xmms-artsRelocations: (not relocateable)
 Version : 0.6.0 Vendor: MandrakeSoft
 Release : 1mdk  Build Date: Sat Sep 13 22:24:36 2003
 -=-=-=-
 Guillaume Cottenceau [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0.6.0-1mdk
 
 - use Havard Kvalen's arts output plugin, should work better
 
 -=-=-=-
 xmms-arts.spec changed
 --- xmms-arts-0.5-2mdk.src.rpm/xmms-arts.spec 2003-09-14 22:49:15.0 +0200
 +++ xmms-arts-0.6.0-1mdk.src.rpm/xmms-arts.spec   2003-09-14 22:49:15.0 
 +0200
 @@ -9,7 +10,7 @@
  License: GPL
  Group: Sound
  URL: http://cmb.is-a-geek.org/xmms-arts/
 -Source:  xmms-arts-%{version}.tar.bz2
 +Source:  
 http://havardk.xmms.org/plugins/arts_output/%{theirname}-%{version}.tar.bz2
  BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-buildroot
  Requires: xmms libarts2
  BuildRequires: gtk+-devel xmms-devel kdelibs-devel arts arts-devel




[Cooker] Re: Re: [CHRPM] openssh-3.6.1p2-7mdk

2003-09-16 Thread David Walser
Hi Vincent, I don't want to bother you too long, I just would like clarification on 
one point:

Vincent Danen wrote:
 Right.  Mandrake Linux 9.2 is not a specialized server product.  It's a
 desktop product.  It has 18mos life.  The 2 years is for MNF, SNF, etc.
 Corporate Server has 3 years.

I thought the deal was that server-related packages would see updates for 2 years, and 
others (workstation/desktop packages basically) would only see updates for 18 months.

What is the deal exactly?




Re: [Cooker] anal buildrequires

2003-09-15 Thread David Coe
It's been a long hot summer!




[Cooker] Re: Draksync question / mirror for members

2003-09-15 Thread David Walser
Buchan Milne wrote:
 Vincent Meyer, MD wrote:
 
  Also, the server's built, the line is in, and would be nice to get this
 server up and available for use of fellow cookers here in North
 America.  If
 a graphic tool like Draksync won't do it, does anyone have a favorite
 mirroring script?
 
 # urpmi rpmsync
 ?

Yes, please people, use the rpmsync package that's in contrib.  People are still 
grabbing cooksync off my webserver because the link is still in the wiki.  It should 
be referring to the rpmsync package now.




[Cooker] Re: Re: Draksync question / mirror for members

2003-09-15 Thread David Walser
Austin wrote:
 On 09/15/2003 08:48:50 PM, David Walser wrote:
 Yes, please people, use the rpmsync package that's in contrib.  People are
 still grabbing cooksync off my webserver because the link is still in the
 wiki.  It should be referring to the rpmsync package now.
 
 So why not replace the reference with a link to the rpmsync RPM?  It installs  
 on any recent version of mandrake, even 9.0 (I tried).

Exactly, someone with wiki access should do that.

Do heed the warning in the README though, if you want to use rpmsync as a full rsync 
drop-in replacement, including giving rpmsync options that are rsync options but not 
rpmsync options, you'll need the newest Getopt::Long or it won't work as expected.




[Cooker] XFree86 and kernel-secure

2003-09-12 Thread David Kobler
Is anybody else having problems with the combination of XFree86 and the
latest kernel-secure.  I can not start x windows with the latest
kernel-secure.  Every other kernel works(kernel, kernel-smp,
kernel-enterprise).

Thanks.



[Cooker] Re: Re: [Contrib-Rpm] sgrotum-1.2.6-1mdk

2003-09-12 Thread David Walser
Olivier Thauvin wrote:
 Le Vendredi 12 Septembre 2003 12:07, Thierry Vignaud a écrit :
 Han Boetes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  Name: sgrotum  Relocations: (not
  relocateable) Version : 1.2.6 Vendor:
  MandrakeSoft Release : 1mdk  Build Date: Fri
  Sep 12 02:35:12 2003 Install Date: (not installed)   Build
  Host: klama.mandrake.org Group   : Networking/Mail  
  Source RPM: (none)
  Size: 59978License: GPL
  Signature   : (none)
  Packager: Han Boetes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  URL : http://homepages.ihug.co.nz/~trmusson/programs.html
  Summary : Email/news SiGnature ROTUMbulator
  Description :
  An email/news SiGnature ROTUMbulator. As well as the rotation and
  randomization of signatures, it'll optionally insert random
  quotations, taking care of length, word-wrap and justification.
  Like this:
 
 
  --
   __   Men often believe -- or pretend -- that the Law
.,-;-;-,. /'_\  is something sacred, or at least a science -- an
  _/_/_/_|_\_\) /   unfounded assumption very convenient to
'-=/\ governments.
  jgs `/_//_/-'\_\


 is this really needed in package description ?
 
 Sure, it's need !

But there's a turtle in his sgrotum.  I hope it's not one of those snapping turtles.




[Cooker] Re: Enlarge your bash completion experience

2003-09-10 Thread David Walser
Frederic Crozat wrote:
 BTW, could you fix bash-completion so :
 
 gendiff foobar-x.y | bzip2 -c  [TAB] will allow TAB to use ANY (or at
 least .bz2) file for this redirection.
 
 Thanks :)

Well if he's gonna do some more hacking/bugfixing on bash-completion, here's another 
one that doesn't complete currently:
mpg321 -@ foo.m3u
ogg123 -@ foo.m3u




[Cooker] Re: Re: Re: [Contrib-Rpm] imp3-3.2.2-1mdk

2003-09-10 Thread David Walser
Guillaume Rousse wrote:
 Ainsi parlait David Walser :
 Guillaume Rousse wrote:
  Ainsi parlait David Walser :
  Guillaume Rousse wrote:
   [Contrib-RPM]
   Name: imp3 Relocations: (not
   relocateable) Version : 3.2.2 Vendor:
   MandrakeSoft Release : 1mdk  Build Date:
   Mon 08 Sep 2003 10:46:41 PM CEST -=-=-=-
   - drop ugly configuration scripts, perl rulez
 
  Well that's fine, but part of the point before was, the script was
  included with the package, so if the user changed their hostname later
  on, they could run the script again and have their config be right
  again.  Do the same with your perl script.
 
  All the script was doing was to replace localhost.localdomain by the
  correct values in a config file, using two scripts, a shell one and a awk
  one. It tooks me almost 10 minutes to understand it, whereas a single
  one-liner in perl could do in one single place. Moreover, i don't see the
  point of adding aditional code, meaning potential security and
  maintainance issues, for such a trivial task, especially for what is
  supposed to be a server. Either you write a complete configuration
  wizard, and install it elsewhere in the filesystem, either you just takes
  cares of it in post-install configuration step.

 Security and Maintainance issues?  That's absolutely ridiculous.
 Wasting ten minutes to figure that something included was quite useless is an 
 issue. I hate this.

Well that has nothing to do with what you said before.  And maybe more people know 
Perl, so maybe your script might make be easier for more people to figure out.  and 
how many times must I explain why it *was* useful?

 Yes your line of code takes care of it in the post-install configuration
 step, but let me re-iterate, what if the user changes their hostname *after
 the package is installed.*  They will need to run that line of code again. 
 Install it as a script like was done before.
 Someone changing hist hostname will have more than imp to reconfigure IMHO. 

Yes, that's true, but so what?  Why shouldn't we make it as easy as possible to at 
least fix the imp configuration when they do?  Especially considering they didn't even 
have to configure it in the first place, we did it automatically for them.

 Are you proposing we add two script to each of those applications just for 

to each?  They were only in one of the packages.  And if you did it fully in Perl it'd 
just be one script.

 this ? Or that we add x others scripts to help clueless user to change x 
 others settings in imp configuration ?

Not for other things, just for hostname since we already did it automatically for them 
in the RPM.

 My point remain the same: either you provide a full configuration wizard, you 
 document it as mdk-specific, and you install it elsewhere as under the 
 webroot. Or you just do minor post-install configuration.
 
 BTW, this is a server, not a joe-user multimedia application. Admins are 
 supposed to be able to configure what they install.

That's no good reason not to make it easier when possible.  Especially when we halfway 
do it in the RPM.  The package seems half finished now.




[Cooker] Re: Re: Re: [Contrib-Rpm] imp3-3.2.2-1mdk

2003-09-10 Thread David Walser
Guillaume Rousse wrote:
 Ainsi parlait Michael Lothian :
 Everthough of having a file somewhere that has the hostname is?  And
 then referencing everything to that file so if something changes
 everything us updated with out reconfiguring anything?
 hostname is in /etc/sysconfig/network.

Not for imp.

 Technically, what you're proposing is doable. However, i still don't 
 understand why so much attention for this topic. Are you really changing your 
 _servers_ hostname everyday, to need such a toy ? It is clearly a waste of 
 resources for me.

No!  You've already expent the resources to write the script (in the spec file).  All 
I'm saying is put it in a file and include it with the package like before!

  Moreover, as sysadmin, I hate black magic changing sensible  
 config stuff behind my back.

It's not black magic, and it's not changing anything behind your back.  The one in the 
spec file makes the package work out of the box, and if you included the script with 
the package, the user would have to explicitly run it.  And if they changed their 
hostname they would not have a sensible config, it would need to be changed.




[Cooker] Re: Re: WindowMaker-Terminal now konsole??

2003-09-10 Thread David Walser
andre wrote:
 On Wednesday 10 September 2003 03:48, David Walser wrote:
 I agree, this is caused by a recent change to kdebase-konsole that makes
 its xvt alternatives value take precedence over rxvt.  I'm not sure I agree
 with that.  I think users should have to change the alternative if they
 want konsole to be the xvt.
 
 If you don't have a menu entry for rxvt than it is a bit stupid to make rxvt 
 precede over term's that have a menu entry.

What's stupid is that rxvt doesn't have a menu entry.  Just because one stupid thing 
has been done doesn't mean we should follow it up with more stupid things.

 alternative has a problem that it doesn't handle gnome and kde well because 
 they have a lot of associated programs you would want to use with them and 
 not under an other wm




[Cooker] Re: perms on /dev/rtc device

2003-09-09 Thread David Walser
But if pam_console makes the locally logged-in user own /dev/rtc and be the only one 
able to read and write from it, doesn't your concern become moot?

Juan Quintela wrote:
 guillaume == Guillaume Rousse [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 guillaume Ainsi parlait Juan Quintela :
  olivier == Olivier Blin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  # RTC resolution
  dev.rtc.max-user-freq = 1024
 
  Could this setting be added in default sysctl.conf ?
 
 olivier Thanks, but shouldn't this be the default in default security
 level ? olivier RTC works fine, but sysctl.conf need to be tweaked.
 olivier IMHO, the user shouldn't have to do that.
 
 Problem is that in a multiuser system, if you allow the value 1024,
 you can create a DOS if several users use that.
 guillaume I guess most multimedia applications are only usable by local user, not a 
 guillaume remote one, which means only one at a time. This should reduce DOS risks, 
 no?
 
 No.  any user can do a very small script/c program an use the whole
 number of timers.  Machine is on its knees :(
 
 guillaume What about adding this setting only through mplayer, tvtime
 guillaume and other packages requiring it %post/%postun facilities ?
 
 Really it is too agresive to set it _unconditionally_.
 
 
 Default value of 64 should be enough except for single-user machines
 running an _almost_ real time application.  And yes, for today
 machines, mplayer is still real-time like application.
 guillaume Not sure to understand what you mean there.
 
 That the value only make sense for single user machines, or for
 machines when you trust all the users will not do something
 dumb/trying to crash your server.
 
 Only way to handle it automagically is having a option in the
 installer/MCC telling something like:
 
 - this is a mono-user system/I trust all the users
 
 Only other easy thing that I can think is teaching msec to set it at
 the most unsecure level.  And I am not sure that people will be
 using that level at all :(
 
 Later, Juan.
 





[Cooker] Rusty's brain broke

2003-09-09 Thread David Kobler
Is anybody getting this message after upgrading to the latest kernel?
kernel: MASQUERADE: No route: Rusty's brain broke!

I am using nat/masquerading to share the internet.  To enable internet
sharing  I must revert back to 2.4.21.

Hope to see this get fixed soon.



[Cooker] Re: Advanced configuration tools

2003-09-09 Thread David Walser
Oden Eriksson wrote:
 Ahh, familiarity breeds contempt? But it does mean less retraining for
 the Mouse Consultants and Solitaire Experts ;-).
 
 Mouse Consultants, ha ha ha ha , never heard that one before, really 
 funny!

Me neither, it's usually Minesweeper Consultants and Solitaire Experts, which makes 
more sense since both refer to games automatically installed with Windows.

I suppose something like Mouse Consultant and Scanner Expert would make sense (?)




[Cooker] Re: Re: [Contrib-Rpm] imp3-3.2.2-1mdk

2003-09-09 Thread David Walser
Guillaume Rousse wrote:

 Ainsi parlait David Walser :
 Guillaume Rousse wrote:
  [Contrib-RPM]
  Name: imp3 Relocations: (not
  relocateable) Version : 3.2.2 Vendor:
  MandrakeSoft Release : 1mdk  Build Date: Mon
  08 Sep 2003 10:46:41 PM CEST -=-=-=-
  - drop ugly configuration scripts, perl rulez

 Well that's fine, but part of the point before was, the script was included
 with the package, so if the user changed their hostname later on, they
 could run the script again and have their config be right again.  Do the
 same with your perl script.
 All the script was doing was to replace localhost.localdomain by the correct 
 values in a config file, using two scripts, a shell one and a awk one. It 
 tooks me almost 10 minutes to understand it, whereas a single one-liner in 
 perl could do in one single place. Moreover, i don't see the point of adding 
 aditional code, meaning potential security and maintainance issues,
 for such a trivial task, especially for what is supposed to be a server. 
 Either you write a complete configuration wizard, and install it elsewhere in 
 the filesystem, either you just takes cares of it in post-install 
 configuration step.

Security and Maintainance issues?  That's absolutely ridiculous.

Yes your line of code takes care of it in the post-install configuration step, but let 
me re-iterate, what if the user changes their hostname *after the package is 
installed.*  They will need to run that line of code again.  Install it as a script 
like was done before.




[Cooker] Re: WindowMaker-Terminal now konsole??

2003-09-09 Thread David Walser
Udo Rader wrote:
 Am Tue, 09 Sep 2003 13:50:50 + schrieb Buchan Milne:
 Udo Rader wrote:
 hi,

 the last cooker update changed the terminal application used by the
 WM-Terminal from xterm to konsole ...

 The deeper reason for this is that xvt is now mapped to konsole per
 default  in /etc/alternatives ... is this really intended? Not only
 does it take quite a long time to start up initially when kde is not
 running, it also requires tons of kde installed on the system.
 
 1)
 # update-alternatives --config xvt
 
 2)
 # urpme kdebase-konsole
 (or which ever package actually now owns konsole)
 
 Well, deleting it is always an option. But what I'm questioning is 
 the _default_ setting for xvt. Does that really have to be konsole? 
 I mean, if I have multiple terminal emus installed, why does konsole
 have to be the default? why not gnome-terminal (or any other)?
 
 Shouldn't this be as lightweight as possible per default?
 
 happy hacking
 
 udo

I agree, this is caused by a recent change to kdebase-konsole that makes its xvt 
alternatives value take precedence over rxvt.  I'm not sure I agree with that.  I 
think users should have to change the alternative if they want konsole to be the xvt.




[Cooker] Re: Horde suite

2003-09-09 Thread David Walser
Yes, but this is an issue that's caused by the horde2/imp3 naming, so we should just 
get rid of it.

There's going to have to be a rename anyway, when horde3 and imp4 come out, we might 
as well make sane and stable names now.

If the newly renamed packages have a provides/obsoletes on the old names, I think 
upgrades will be OK.

magic wrote:
 I believe this was discussed a few months back, and was decided that the 
 packages should remain horde2/imp3 for compatability purposes.
 
If they change to horde/imp will that not create issues for pre 9.2 
 users that already have the horde suite configured  installed? (Not to 
 mention making things much more confusing.)
 
Thanks,
 
S
 
 Guillaume Rousse wrote:
 
I just rewieved the whole horde suite:
- horde2
- imp3
- turba
- chora

It seems old imp 1 or 2 are no longer around, while there is still old 
horde-nag 1. Could we nuke it, and turn horde2 to horde and imp3 to imp ?

BTW, i found the ADVX macros very useful. Why are those macros in 
/usr/share/ADVX, and not integrated among standard rpm macros ?

I also found most private directories are both protected by the in apache 
config file, and by a local .htaccess in the directory. Isn't this a bit 
redundant.

Finally, all those sensible files (apache config file, .htaccess files) are 
owned by apache groupe, with 640 perms, which make rpmlint scream. Time for 
some new rpmlint exception/check ?
  

 
 
 
 





[Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] mandrake_theme-0.0.8-1mdk

2003-09-08 Thread David Walser
Warly wrote:
 Name: mandrake_theme   Relocations: (not relocateable)
 Version : 0.0.8 Vendor: MandrakeSoft
 Release : 1mdk  Build Date: Tue 09 Sep 2003 01:56:42 AM 
 CEST
 -if [ `readlink %mdk_bg/root/default.png` == Discovery-root.png ]; then rm -f 
 %mdk_bg/root/default.png;fi
 +if [ `readlink %mdk_bg/root/default.png` == Discovqery-root.png ]; then rm -f 
 %mdk_bg/root/default.png;fi

o_O  Say what?



[Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] imp3-3.2.2-1mdk

2003-09-08 Thread David Walser
Guillaume Rousse wrote:
 [Contrib-RPM]
 Name: imp3 Relocations: (not relocateable)
 Version : 3.2.2 Vendor: MandrakeSoft
 Release : 1mdk  Build Date: Mon 08 Sep 2003 10:46:41 PM 
 CEST
 -=-=-=-
 Guillaume Rousse [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3.2.2-1mdk
 
 - 3.2.2
 - speac cleanup

You call that a cleanup?  Geez, I'd hate to see your room.

 - remove useless files from webroot (.dist, doc files, .po)
 - properly tag localisation files
 - drop apache1 integration
 - drop ugly configuration scripts, perl rulez

Well that's fine, but part of the point before was, the script was included with the 
package, so if the user changed their hostname later on, they could run the script 
again and have their config be right again.  Do the same with your perl script.

(and BTW, awk is beautiful :P   )

 - fixed URL
 - removed implicit dependencies



[Cooker] Re: Re: What happened to am-utils?

2003-09-08 Thread David Walser
Buchan Milne wrote:
 BTW, if you choose LDAP auth during install, you should now get autofs
 installed, and if you have LDAP automount maps setup well, they should
 work out-the-box (I still need to test this though ...).
 
 Maybe David Walser can comment on some of these actions would be
 worthwhile for NIS also (although it may be too late).
 
 Regards,
 Buchan

For most setups, I'm sure that would be useful.  For the lab I used to run it wouldn't 
have been because I had a mixed Solaris/Linux network, and the automounter maps used 
cachefs which is only available on Solaris, so I didn't want the Linux boxes seeing 
the NIS automounter maps.  Most people probably would just forget the cachefs and have 
a portable NIS automounter map.




[Cooker] Re: Re: [CHRPM] OpenOffice.org-1.1-0.rc3.2mdk

2003-09-08 Thread David Walser
Buchan Milne wrote:
 The OOo team wishes a perfect product. I have the same wish for Mdk 9.2 !
 
 If it were perfect, what would we do after 9.2 release? Close cooker ? ;-)

1) Party

2) Sleep

3) Go everywhere installing MDK 9.2 on every system we can find.




[Cooker] Re: Horde suite

2003-09-08 Thread David Walser
Guillaume Rousse wrote:
 I just rewieved the whole horde suite:
 - horde2
 - imp3
 - turba
 - chora
 
 It seems old imp 1 or 2 are no longer around, while there is still old 
 horde-nag 1. Could we nuke it, and turn horde2 to horde and imp3 to imp ?

Please do.




[Cooker] Re: Re: [Contrib-Rpm] imp3-3.2.2-1mdk

2003-09-08 Thread David Walser
Michael Lothian wrote:
 My uni uses imp
 
 MAy try and plau arrond imp where is this awk btw? I like pretty things
 
 Mike

I had written an awk script that was run when the package was installed.  It would fix 
your imp configuration to properly reflect your hostname (so when users sent e-mails 
they wouldn't say from [EMAIL PROTECTED]).  I also had that awk script installed with 
the package so the administrator could run it again if they ever changed the hostname.

He converted my awk script to a perl script, but failed to install a copy of it with 
the package.

awk is a text-processing language (mini-programming language), it is beautifully 
concise and expressive.  Read awk's manpage to learn it.




[Cooker] Re: Re: [Contrib-Rpm] kernel-2.6-2.6.0-0.test4.3mdk

2003-09-07 Thread David Walser
Olivier Blin wrote:
 Has someone tried to build test4 without any patch and to boot it
 successfully ?

I'm not using the RPM, just the stock code, and it works fine.  Compiled with:
gcc version 3.3.1 (Mandrake Linux 9.2 3.3.1-0.7mdk)




[Cooker] Re: Re: Re: [CHRPM] rxvt-2.7.10-3mdk

2003-09-06 Thread David Walser
Thierry Vignaud wrote:
 at first, i strongly disagree with dadou violation of the packaging policy.
 
 but now i think that dadou thoughs is that we'll quite always install
 rxvt since it's required by drakconf, even if user has not asked for
 terminals.

Meanwhile the users that actually *want* rxvt are screwed.

 the long-term solution would be to have a perl binding for the vte
 widget that would enable us to get rid of the rxvt dependancy on
 drakconf.




[Cooker] Re: Re: Re: Re: [CHRPM] rxvt-2.7.10-3mdk

2003-09-06 Thread David Walser
Thierry Vignaud wrote:
 David Walser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  at first, i strongly disagree with dadou violation of the
  packaging policy.
  
  but now i think that dadou thoughs is that we'll quite always
  install rxvt since it's required by drakconf, even if user has not
  asked for terminals.
 
 Meanwhile the users that actually *want* rxvt are screwed.
 
 agreed but i've no fix :-(

Well the fix is to put the menu entry back.




[Cooker] Re: XFree86-libs - pb finding.

2003-09-05 Thread David Walser
Buchan Milne wrote:
 Well, it actually means the package has been libified, to follow the
 distribution policy. Anyway, you will see:
 
 $ rpm -q --whatprovides XFree86-devel
 libxfree86-devel-4.3-20mdk
 $ urpmq -p XFree86-devel
 libxfree86-devel

Well that was the attempt anyway.  I'm sure using 86 as the major number isn't right 
though.  Man I really hope that never needs to be incremented :/




[Cooker] Re: drakxtools and printer troubles

2003-09-05 Thread David Walser
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
 this is overwhelmingly[1] strange. tvignaud will try to have a
 look..
 
 Ref: 
 [1] excuse my broken english

I don't see anything wrong with it




[Cooker] Re: What happened to am-utils?

2003-09-05 Thread David Walser
Bryan Whitehead wrote:
 Bryan Whitehead wrote:
 am-utils is a very much-needed package for Linux to integrate into big 
 UNIX shops.
 
 NASA/JPL (at least in my section) is a big UNIX Shop. Wiothout 
 am-utils we are pretty screwed... is there a reason this package was 
 removed from 9.2 ? Has it just been renamed?
 
 
 BTW, this package was removed from 9.1 also. I made my own RPM from the 
 only in 9.0, but it's still a hassle.
 
 When I reccomend Mandrake to other admins the first thing they ask is 
 Where fsck is am-utils? I then send them some RPM's... But it would be 
 nice if it was shipped standard...

And you are using it instead of autofs because...?




Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] rxvt-2.7.10-3mdk

2003-09-04 Thread David Baudens
 Am Donnerstag, 4. September 2003 02:48 schrieb David Baudens:
  Am Donnerstag, 4. September 2003 02:21 schrieb David Baudens:
   Why?
 
  To not have several terminal emulators in applications menu. Rxvt
 is always installed (used by MCC) and will be duplicated with other
 terminals.
 
  Thats good :) However, we need to ensure that kde-konsole is
  installed per default

 It is when you choose Console tools (or something like that, I don't
 have files to check here) during installation. I uploaded a new
 rpmsrate today (which probably needed to be enhanced, I need to do
 more tests to be sure).

 What i wanted say is that kde-konsole should be installed if
 kde-workstation is choosen. How am i supposed to urpmi without it ? ;)

Using rpmdrake or using console (ctrlr-alt-f1)?



 Just my humble opinion

Problem is that a terminal emulator is not needed for an
office/multimedia/internet/ect. workstation. So, if people who install
computer don't explictly say he want to use a terminal, there is no reason
to install it. It is why Konsole is not installed when KDE is installed.

Act as that seems to me reasonable





[Cooker] Re: Re: [CHRPM] rxvt-2.7.10-3mdk

2003-09-04 Thread David Walser
andre wrote:
 On Thursday 04 September 2003 02:21, David Baudens wrote:
  Why?

 To not have several terminal emulators in applications menu. Rxvt is
 always installed (used by MCC) and will be duplicated with other
 terminals.
 I still don't understand why rxvt shouldn't have a menu entry. How else would 
 i start rxvt 

Exactly.  Especially considering I use khotkeys to start Rxvt, and that requires it 
have a menu entry.




Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] rxvt-2.7.10-3mdk

2003-09-04 Thread David Baudens
On Thursday 04 September 2003 13:30, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
 David Baudens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  Problem is that a terminal emulator is not needed for an
  office/multimedia/internet/ect. workstation. So, if people who install
  computer don't explictly say he want to use a terminal, there is no
  reason to install it. It is why Konsole is not installed when KDE is
  installed.
 
  Act as that seems to me reasonable

 I humbly think that's not good.

 Just as a side note, in Windows XP, only solution to do a real
 check of the disk is to open a Command Prompt (that's how it's
 called, and it's installed by default) and to use chkdsk from
 there. Just to show that even users of XP (the easy OS) need
 sometimes to do things in Command Prompt - and we even encourage
 them to do a chkdsk from there before installing Mandrake.

 Now, there is another reason, maybe even more important: Linux
 is, as Windows, still too complicated for most users, who tend to
 ask their friends for support when they have a request. And these
 friends will surely often ask them to open a console or a
 terminal and launch whatever command from there. Hitting
 Ctrl-Alt-F1 is more complicated (and won't work if they want to
 launch an XFree app). Thus, a terminal program should be
 installed and easily accessible from the Menu, in my humble
 opinion (even if one is accessible from MCC, because if the
 friend is a Debian fan he won't know that).

?

I don't understand why people want always install a terminal. Most of users 
don't need it. If you need one, simply choose Consoles tools category when 
you can choose which packages should be installed. And if you need one 
after installation, simply launch rpmdrake and install a terminal.

I can understand that most of people using Cooker need a terminal. But you 
also need to understand that we don't develop a product only for Cooker 
users. Most of our users simply don't need a terminal.

-- 
David Baudens
MandrakeSoft - http://www.mandrakesoft.com




Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] rxvt-2.7.10-3mdk

2003-09-04 Thread David Baudens
On Thursday 04 September 2003 11:26, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
 Steffen Barszus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why?
  
   To not have several terminal emulators in applications menu. Rxvt is
   always installed (used by MCC) and will be duplicated with other
   terminals.
 
  Thats good :) However, we need to ensure that kde-konsole is installed
  per default then, as on my testinstall of RC1 rxvt was the only
  terminal application installed. I guess something for Laurent ;)

 dadou, update rpmsrate so that kdebase-konsole get installed too

It was commited.

-- 
David Baudens
MandrakeSoft - http://www.mandrakesoft.com




Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] rxvt-2.7.10-3mdk

2003-09-04 Thread David Baudens
On Thursday 04 September 2003 14:11, Frederic Crozat wrote:
 On Thu, 04 Sep 2003 14:09:00 +0200, David Baudens wrote:
  On Thursday 04 September 2003 13:30, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
  David Baudens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
   Problem is that a terminal emulator is not needed for an
   office/multimedia/internet/ect. workstation. So, if people who
   install computer don't explictly say he want to use a terminal,
   there is no reason to install it. It is why Konsole is not
   installed when KDE is installed.
  
   Act as that seems to me reasonable
 
  I humbly think that's not good.
 
  Just as a side note, in Windows XP, only solution to do a real
  check of the disk is to open a Command Prompt (that's how it's
  called, and it's installed by default) and to use chkdsk from
  there. Just to show that even users of XP (the easy OS) need
  sometimes to do things in Command Prompt - and we even encourage
  them to do a chkdsk from there before installing Mandrake.
 
  Now, there is another reason, maybe even more important: Linux
  is, as Windows, still too complicated for most users, who tend to
  ask their friends for support when they have a request. And these
  friends will surely often ask them to open a console or a
  terminal and launch whatever command from there. Hitting
  Ctrl-Alt-F1 is more complicated (and won't work if they want to
  launch an XFree app). Thus, a terminal program should be
  installed and easily accessible from the Menu, in my humble
  opinion (even if one is accessible from MCC, because if the
  friend is a Debian fan he won't know that).
 
  ?
 
  I don't understand why people want always install a terminal. Most of
  users don't need it. If you need one, simply choose Consoles tools
  category when you can choose which packages should be installed. And
  if you need one after installation, simply launch rpmdrake and install
  a terminal.
 
  I can understand that most of people using Cooker need a terminal. But
  you also need to understand that we don't develop a product only for
  Cooker users. Most of our users simply don't need a terminal.

 Then we should move Terminal menu entry from main menu to a subsection
 (Applications is probably the best choice).

I agree. But is too late for 9.2.



 Moreover, for people not using GNOME/KDE default install (ie without
 gnome-terminal/konsole installed), rxvt won't appear in menu, even if it
 is available.. I think it is wrong, since our menu used to display all
 available graphical applications installed on the system..

xterm is installed if KDE or GNOME are not installed.

-- 
David Baudens
MandrakeSoft - http://www.mandrakesoft.com




[Cooker] Re: Re: [CHRPM] rxvt-2.7.10-3mdk

2003-09-04 Thread David Walser
David Baudens wrote:
 I don't understand why people want always install a terminal. Most of users 
 don't need it. If you need one, simply choose Consoles tools category when 
 you can choose which packages should be installed. And if you need one 
 after installation, simply launch rpmdrake and install a terminal.
 
 I can understand that most of people using Cooker need a terminal. But you 
 also need to understand that we don't develop a product only for Cooker 
 users. Most of our users simply don't need a terminal.

That's all fine.  But if someone *does* install a terminal, it should be in the 
freakin' menu!!!




[Cooker] Re: Re: [CHRPM] rxvt-2.7.10-3mdk

2003-09-04 Thread David Walser
David Baudens wrote:
 xterm is installed if KDE or GNOME are not installed.

So?  xterm != rxvt.  Anyway, xterm sucks.

Like someone else said, why don't we remove Koffice and Mozilla's menu entries?  Why, 
OO.o and Konq are already in the menu!  No, that makes no sense.  Policy is all 
graphical apps installed go in the menu.  You violated that policy.




[Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] rxvt-2.7.10-3mdk

2003-09-03 Thread David Walser
Why?

David Baudens wrote:
 -=-=-=-
 Name: rxvt Relocations: (not relocateable)
 Version : 2.7.10Vendor: MandrakeSoft
 Release : 3mdk  Build Date: Wed Sep  3 21:14:33 2003
 -=-=-=-
 David Baudens [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2.7.10-3mdk
 
 - Remove menu entry for rxvt package (but keep it for CJK package)



Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] rxvt-2.7.10-3mdk

2003-09-03 Thread David Baudens
 Why?

To not have several terminal emulators in applications menu. Rxvt is
always installed (used by MCC) and will be duplicated with other
terminals.



 David Baudens wrote:
 -=-=-=-
 Name: rxvt Relocations: (not
 relocateable) Version : 2.7.10Vendor:
 MandrakeSoft Release : 3mdk  Build Date:
 Wed Sep  3 21:14:33 2003 -=-=-=-
 David Baudens [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2.7.10-3mdk

 - Remove menu entry for rxvt package (but keep it for CJK package)





Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] rxvt-2.7.10-3mdk

2003-09-03 Thread David Baudens
 Am Donnerstag, 4. September 2003 02:21 schrieb David Baudens:
  Why?

 To not have several terminal emulators in applications menu. Rxvt is
 always installed (used by MCC) and will be duplicated with other
 terminals.

 Thats good :) However, we need to ensure that kde-konsole is installed
 per default

It is when you choose Console tools (or something like that, I don't have
files to check here) during installation. I uploaded a new rpmsrate today
(which probably needed to be enhanced, I need to do more tests to be
sure).







[Cooker] Re: Re: [CHRPM] rxvt-2.7.10-3mdk

2003-09-03 Thread David Walser
David Baudens wrote:
 Why?
 
 To not have several terminal emulators in applications menu. Rxvt is
 always installed (used by MCC) and will be duplicated with other
 terminals.

But they aren't in the applications menu, they're in the Terminals menu.

Why shouldn't each terminal emulator package that's installed have an entry in the 
menu like any other app?

 David Baudens wrote:
 -=-=-=-
 Name: rxvt Relocations: (not
 relocateable) Version : 2.7.10Vendor:
 MandrakeSoft Release : 3mdk  Build Date:
 Wed Sep  3 21:14:33 2003 -=-=-=-
 David Baudens [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2.7.10-3mdk

 - Remove menu entry for rxvt package (but keep it for CJK package)
 
 
 
 





[Cooker] Re: Re: Re: Re: wiki update (9.2 schedule / CREDITS)

2003-08-31 Thread David Walser
Levi Ramsey wrote:
 On Sat Aug 30 18:56 -0400, David Walser wrote:
 Well, when libao goes to pick an output plugin, it starts testing them all to see 
 if they work (each implements a test function).  When it finds one that works, it 
 keeps looping, and only tests further ones if they have a priority than the one 
 that already worked.  They way the list they looped over was created before, they 
 had no control over the order the different plugins were in.
 
 I changed it so the list is sorted in order of plugin priority (highest to lowest), 
 so as soon as it finds a plugin that works, it breaks out of the loop.  It's 
 basically an optimization to the autodetection (of whether to use arts, esd, oss, 
 alsa, etc output) code, it should make it faster.
 
 Excellent.  Now that pesky arts bug won't cause segfaults when other
 output plugins end up being used...

I doubt it's an arts bug, because it used to work, and then I upgraded some of my 
Cooker *without* upgrading arts and then it broke.  Maybe it's glibc.

But you're right, the crash happens during the arts plugin's test function, and that 
won't even be run if *any* higher priority plugins work.




  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >