Re: [Cooker] 9.1 Beta 2

2003-01-21 Thread Sander Jonkers aka Surfer
On Tue, 2003-01-21 at 14:13, Austin Acton wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-01-21 at 03:49, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 22:26, Sander Jonkers aka Surfer wrote:
> > > Do we have to vote for something small and essential as IceWM? I can't
> > > use my 400Mhz/64MB laptop without it.
> > 
> > I use my 400Mhz/128MB laptop with GNOME, but maybe I'm just a masochist
> 
> My PII/300MHz/128MB laptop runs GNOME just fine.  As long as I don't

Wow, 128 MB?! That must twice as capable as my machine. ;-(

> open Mozilla or OpenOffice, it's not that bad.  I find the slowest part
> of the system is the hard drive anyway.  Besides, when I used blackbox,

My hard drive must be slow also: as soon as swap (on the hard drive) is
needed, the slow down is enormours.

> Mozilla and OpenOffice didn't open any faster anyway.

I run IceWM, knode and evolution locally. Running Galeon on top of that
is horribly slow, so I do a 'ssh' to my BigMachine upstairs (0.75Ghz,
0.75GB RAM) and run Galeon from there.

Sander






Re: [Cooker] 9.1 Beta 2

2003-01-20 Thread Sander Jonkers aka Surfer
On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 10:14, Warly wrote:

> IceWM 25 

Do we have to vote for something small and essential as IceWM? I can't
use my 400Mhz/64MB laptop without it.

Sander







Re: [Cooker] [Bug 710] [initscripts] mix-up bug ininitscripts-6.91-18mdk.i586.rpm: old style test_ipv6 and new styleipv6_test mixed up

2002-12-31 Thread Sander Jonkers aka Surfer
On Tue, 2002-12-31 at 10:35, Warly wrote:
> Sander Jonkers aka Surfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:



> > Whoa, that's interesting: there is NO mixup of test_ipv6 and
ipv6_test
> > anymore (which is good), BUT all has 'migrated' to the old style
> > 'test_ipv6' instead of to the new style 'ipv6_test' (introduced by
> > Bieringer since November 2001).
> > Is this what you wanted to do? 
> 
> Yes, that is what I wanted to do.
> 
> > If so, why are you avoiding Bieringer's > new style?
> 
> We based our initscripts on redhat one, to keep good compatibility,
> and try not to break everything which make the merge impossible.

I don't know if I understand you correctly, but I checked and RedHat
8.0's initscripts-6.95-1.i386.rpm has scripts based on the NEW style
Bieringer files. Proof:

Old style (non existing):
[sander@flappie90 network-scripts]$ grep "test_ipv6 " * |wc
  0   0   0

New Style:
[sander@flappie90 network-scripts]$ grep "ipv6_test " * |wc
 30 1651481

> If needed I will used new Bieringer files.

I think it's much more handy to go 1) with Bieringer and 2) with RedHat,
and thus migrate to the new style ipv6_test/ipv6_*.

Sander






Re: [Cooker] [Bug 710] [initscripts] mix-up bug ininitscripts-6.91-18mdk.i586.rpm: old style test_ipv6 and new styleipv6_test mixed up

2002-12-31 Thread Sander Jonkers aka Surfer
First results:

My machine serving as IPv6-tunnel-machine, is a pure Mandrake 9.0 (so
not Cooker).

Testing Result 1: trying to install the Cooker-rpm on Mandrake 9.0:

[root@sander90 root]# rpm -ivh initscripts-6.91-19mdk.i586.rpm
error: failed dependencies:
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)   is needed by initscripts-6.91-19mdk
[root@sander90 root]#

--> Should I try a forced install, or is that going to break my machine?


Testing Result 2: I unpacked the Cooker-RPM, mv-ed all files in
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/* into a seperate directory, and copied
all files from the RPM into /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ again. Then
I rebooted. BIG problem: ifconfig showed lo and eth0, but eth0 had not
it's original 10.0.0.2 address. So I had to do a rollback.


If I should up a Cooker-machine with IPv6-tunneling, testing will take
quite some time, I'm afraid.

Sander




On Tue, 2002-12-31 at 10:35, Warly wrote:
> Sander Jonkers aka Surfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> > 
> >
> > On Mon, 2002-12-30 at 14:25, Warly wrote:
> >
> >> Does
> > https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/~warly/doc/rpm/initscripts-6.91-19mdk.i586.rpm
> >> fix your problem ?
> >
> > I unpacked that file into a working directory (not into the real
> > directory) and did a first test:
> >
> > [sander@sander90 network-scripts]$ grep "test_ipv6 " * |wc
> >  26 1311159
> > [sander@sander90 network-scripts]$ grep "ipv6_test " * |wc
> >   0   0   0
> >
> > Whoa, that's interesting: there is NO mixup of test_ipv6 and ipv6_test
> > anymore (which is good), BUT all has 'migrated' to the old style
> > 'test_ipv6' instead of to the new style 'ipv6_test' (introduced by
> > Bieringer since November 2001).
> > Is this what you wanted to do? 
> 
> Yes, that is what I wanted to do.
> 
> > If so, why are you avoiding Bieringer's > new style?
> 
> We based our initscripts on redhat one, to keep good compatibility,
> and try not to break everything which make the merge impossible.
> 
> If needed I will used new Bieringer files.
> 
> -- 
> Warly
> 
> 







Re: [Cooker] [Bug 710] [initscripts] mix-up bug ininitscripts-6.91-18mdk.i586.rpm: old style test_ipv6 and new styleipv6_test mixed up

2002-12-30 Thread Sander Jonkers aka Surfer


On Mon, 2002-12-30 at 14:25, Warly wrote:

> Does
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/~warly/doc/rpm/initscripts-6.91-19mdk.i586.rpm
> fix your problem ?

I unpacked that file into a working directory (not into the real
directory) and did a first test:

[sander@sander90 network-scripts]$ grep "test_ipv6 " * |wc
 26 1311159
[sander@sander90 network-scripts]$ grep "ipv6_test " * |wc
  0   0   0

Whoa, that's interesting: there is NO mixup of test_ipv6 and ipv6_test
anymore (which is good), BUT all has 'migrated' to the old style
'test_ipv6' instead of to the new style 'ipv6_test' (introduced by
Bieringer since November 2001).
Is this what you wanted to do? If so, why are you avoiding Bieringer's
new style?

Sander


On Mon, 2002-12-30 at 14:25, Warly wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> 
> >> Yes I was in the process of uploading a new version, but the user which
> >> was
> >> making test for me to confirm does not answer back. I think I will upload
> >> anyway.
> >
> > I look forward to testing, so please upload the new RPM. FYI I won't have
> > access to my computer during 2 - 9 january, so testing will be before or
> > after that period.
> 
> Does https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/~warly/doc/rpm/initscripts-6.91-19mdk.i586.rpm
> fix your problem ?
> 
> -- 
> Warly
> 
> 







Re: [Cooker] [Bug 710] [initscripts] mix-up bug ininitscripts-6.91-18mdk.i586.rpm: old style test_ipv6 and new styleipv6_test mixed up

2002-12-30 Thread Sander Jonkers aka Surfer
On Mon, 2002-12-30 at 14:25, Warly wrote:

> Does
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/~warly/doc/rpm/initscripts-6.91-19mdk.i586.rpm
> fix your problem ?

I unpacked that file into a working directory (not into the real
directory) and did a first test:

[sander@sander90 network-scripts]$ grep "test_ipv6 " * |wc
 26 1311159
[sander@sander90 network-scripts]$ grep "ipv6_test " * |wc
  0   0   0

Whoa, that's interesting: there is NO mixup of test_ipv6 and ipv6_test
anymore (which is good), BUT all has 'migrated' to the old style
'test_ipv6' instead of to the new style 'ipv6_test' (introduced by
Bieringer since November 2001).

Is this what you wanted to do? If so, why are you avoiding Bieringer's
new style?

Sander


On Mon, 2002-12-30 at 14:25, Warly wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> 
> >> Yes I was in the process of uploading a new version, but the user which
> >> was
> >> making test for me to confirm does not answer back. I think I will upload
> >> anyway.
> >
> > I look forward to testing, so please upload the new RPM. FYI I won't have
> > access to my computer during 2 - 9 january, so testing will be before or
> > after that period.
> 
> Does https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/~warly/doc/rpm/initscripts-6.91-19mdk.i586.rpm
> fix your problem ?
> 
> -- 
> Warly
> 
> 







Re: [Cooker] [Bug 710] [initscripts] mix-up bug ininitscripts-6.91-18mdk.i586.rpm: old style test_ipv6 and new styleipv6_test mixed up

2002-12-30 Thread surfer
> Yes I was in the process of uploading a new version, but the user which
> was
> making test for me to confirm does not answer back. I think I will upload
> anyway.

I look forward to testing, so please upload the new RPM. FYI I won't have
access to my computer during 2 - 9 january, so testing will be before or
after that period.

Sander aka Surfer



> "[Bug 710]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
>>
>>What|Removed |Added
>> 
>>  AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>>
>> --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2002-12-28 23:00
>> ---
>> Short: the ipv6 files in initscripts-6.91-18mdk.i586.rpm should be made
>> up-to-date to Bieringer's files (dated after November 2001). Now the RPM
>> is a mixup of old and new style files and functions which do not work
>> together.
>>
>> Long:
>>
>> To be complete: I solved this bug in the initscripts-6.91-18mdk.i586.rpm
>> with IPv6 functions by copying in two files from Bieringer's site
>> ftp://ftp.bieringer.de/pub/linux/IPv6/initscripts/stable/
>>
>> The result: old, incorrect files using old style function definitions
>> 'test_ipv6' renamed to .ORG, the correct files with function 'ipv6_test'
>> in place, which enabled my IPv6 tunnel setup:
>>
>> $ ll | egrep "init.ipv6-global|network-functions-ipv6"
>> -rwxr-xr-x1 root root 9575 Jan 25  2002
>> init.ipv6-global*
>> -rwxr-xr-x1 root root 4752 Nov 19 15:59
>> init.ipv6-global.ORG*
>> -rw-r--r--1 root root82217 Dec  3 21:09
>> network-functions-ipv6
>> -rw-r--r--1 root root24055 Nov 19 15:59
>> network-functions-ipv6.ORG
>> [sander@sander90 network-scripts]$
>>
>> Apparantly Bieringer has done the renaming in November 2001:
>>
>> QOUTE
>> 2001-11-24: Peter Bieringer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>   big renaming was done in network-functions-ipv6, now all functions
>> start
>> with ipv6_. Replacement list:
>> OLD NEW
>> test_ipv6   ipv6_test
>> testipv6_valid  ipv6_test_ipv6_addr_valid
>> testipv4_valid  ipv6_test_ipv4_addr_valid
>> 
>> /QUOTE
>>
>> Mandrake 8.2 was OK: it only used the all style functions.
>> Mandrake 9.0 and current Cooker are not OK: they use old style in
>> init.ipv6-global and network-functions-ipv6, but new style in other
>> scripts in that directory.
>> Testing is easy: if both 'ipv6_test' and 'test_ipv6' occur in the files
>> in the directory /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts, things are _not_ OK
>>
>> Copying in the two mentioned files worked for me, but probably bringing
>> all Bieringer's ipv6 related files in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts
>> up-to-date would be better.
>>
>
> [...]
>
> Yes I was in the process of uploading a new version, but the user which
> was
> making test for me to confirm does not answer back. I think I will upload
> anyway.
>
> --
> Warly
>
>





Re: [Cooker] [Bug 710] [initscripts] New: mix-up bug ininitscripts-6.91-18mdk.i586.rpm: old style test_ipv6 and new styleipv6_test mixed up

2002-12-28 Thread Sander Jonkers aka Surfer
Short: the ipv6 files in initscripts-6.91-18mdk.i586.rpm should be made
up-to-date to Bieringer's files (dated after November 2001). Now the RPM
is a mixup of old and new style files and functions which do not work
together.

Long:

To be complete: I solved this bug in the initscripts-6.91-18mdk.i586.rpm
with IPv6 functions by copying in two files from Bieringer's site
ftp://ftp.bieringer.de/pub/linux/IPv6/initscripts/stable/

The result: old, incorrect files using old style function definitions
'test_ipv6' renamed to .ORG, the correct files with function 'ipv6_test'
in place, which enabled my IPv6 tunnel setup:

$ ll | egrep "init.ipv6-global|network-functions-ipv6"
-rwxr-xr-x1 root root 9575 Jan 25  2002
init.ipv6-global*
-rwxr-xr-x1 root root 4752 Nov 19 15:59
init.ipv6-global.ORG*
-rw-r--r--1 root root82217 Dec  3 21:09
network-functions-ipv6
-rw-r--r--1 root root24055 Nov 19 15:59
network-functions-ipv6.ORG
[sander@sander90 network-scripts]$ 

Apparantly Bieringer has done the renaming in November 2001:

QOUTE
2001-11-24: Peter Bieringer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  big renaming was done in network-functions-ipv6, now all functions
start
with ipv6_. Replacement list:
OLD NEW
test_ipv6   ipv6_test
testipv6_valid  ipv6_test_ipv6_addr_valid
testipv4_valid  ipv6_test_ipv4_addr_valid

/QUOTE

Mandrake 8.2 was OK: it only used the all style functions.
Mandrake 9.0 and current Cooker are not OK: they use old style in
init.ipv6-global and network-functions-ipv6, but new style in other
scripts in that directory.
Testing is easy: if both 'ipv6_test' and 'test_ipv6' occur in the files
in the directory /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts, things are _not_ OK

Copying in the two mentioned files worked for me, but probably bringing
all Bieringer's ipv6 related files in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts
up-to-date would be better.

Sander




On Fri, 2002-12-27 at 23:42, [Bug 710] wrote:
> https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710
> 
>Product: initscripts
>  Component: program
>Summary: mix-up bug in initscripts-6.91-18mdk.i586.rpm: old style
> test_ipv6 and new style ipv6_test mixed up
>Version: 6.91-18mdk
>   Platform: PC
> OS/Version: All
> Status: UNCONFIRMED
>   Severity: normal
>   Priority: P2
> AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> Regarding initscripts-6.91-18mdk.i586.rpm (current cooker file), I'm quite sure
> I have found a bug in that RPM (and in the older RPM
> initscripts-6.91-10mdk.i586.rpm from Mandrake 9.0), which is easily solved by
> getting all the up-to-date scripts from Bieringer's site:
> 
> Some scripts in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ use the old style test_ipv6,
> other scripts use the new style ipv6_test. For example, a problem is that
> calling script 'ifup-sit' uses the function ipv6_test, whereas the function
> provider script 'network-functions-ipv6' is still on test_ipv6. This is a mix-up
> which causes that you can't use IPv6 tunnels on Mandrake 9.0 / Cooker.
> 
> The explanation is easy: somewhere in the past Bieringer switched his functions
> from _ipv6 to ipv6_. Of course you should switch in one time,
> which apparantly has not happened.
> 
> I've posted my experiences and the solution (updating the scripts from
> Bieringer's site) in the newsgroup:
> 
>http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&threadm=24dfc763.0212030244.67acff6d%40posting.google.com&rnum=1&prev=/groups%3Fq%3Dkameel%2Bipv6%2Bbieringer%2Bmandrake%26meta%3Dsite%253Dgroups
> 
> I hope this can be solved.
> 
> 
> 
> --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
> You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
> 
>