Re: [Cooker] 9.1 final

2003-03-19 Thread Robert Fox
On Tue, 2003-03-18 at 23:02, Frederic Lepied wrote:
> 9.1 is gone to production. In the name of MandrakeSoft engineering
> team, I would like to thank all the cookers for the great help you
> provided to build this release. Thank you very much !

May the source be with you!  As usual - great work!!  All the best for
this release and the bright future to come!  Kudos . .

R.Fox




Re: [Cooker] 9.1 final

2003-03-19 Thread Pascal Cavy

Ouiii bravo à toute l'equipe mandrake et à tous les developpeurs/testeurs 
de cooker :)  Jamais le bureau sous  linux n'avait ete aussi net et propre  
:)

yeah bravo to all members of Mandrake and cooker hackers/testers.
The linux desktop has never been so clean and shiny ;)

-- 
Pascal Cavy - VMF
__
Running 2 days,  1:48,  8 users,  load average: 0.27, 0.26, 0.25
(gcc version 3.2.2 (Mandrake Linux 9.1 3.2.2-3mdk))
Kernel Linux version 2.4.21-0.13mdkenterprise




Re: [Cooker] 9.1 final

2003-03-19 Thread Eric Fernandez
Frederic Lepied wrote:

9.1 is gone to production. In the name of MandrakeSoft engineering
team, I would like to thank all the cookers for the great help you
provided to build this release. Thank you very much !
 

Congratulations again !
This is really great. Best wishes for the future, I hope you will go out 
of your financial problems.

Eric





Re: [Cooker] 9.1 final

2003-03-19 Thread Clive Dove
On Tuesday 18 March 2003 21:55, HoytDuff wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 March 2003 09:43 pm, Greg Meyer wrote:
> > And what do I do if I don't have an "old" kernel installed?  Punt?
>
> How about using mc to extract the kernel from the correct kernel rpm
> and install it manually?

You will have to force the install. 

And what about other elements of the system bearing date March 18, 2003 
that might also not have changed numbers.

My guess is that the only safe way would be to re-install the frpm the 
original disks and then set up your mirror again and then update.

Or wait for the final set of iso images to arrive then do a new install.





Re: [Cooker] 9.1 final

2003-03-19 Thread Michael Scherer
Entête en cours de reécriture, merci de patienter en lisant la réponse au mail 
de Till Kamppeter, à Mercredi 19 Mars 2003 01:44
> Michael Scherer wrote:
> > Can you please tell to me that the security hole discovered this morning
> > is closed ?
>
> Check your Cooker mirror whether it already caught up kernel
> 2.4.21-0.13mdk. This is the fixed one. The Cooker on our compilation
> cluster is exactly 9.1 now, including this kernel. So update as soon as
> you r mirror gets the new kernel.

ok, i guess I need to get the habits of having hole disclosed after the fix, 
but, this is great.

Good work for the 9.1

-- 

Mickaël Scherer




Re: [Cooker] 9.1 final

2003-03-18 Thread Francisco Alcaraz Ariza
Great!

I tryed to update cooker yesterday but I had lots of problem and errors in the 
cds created, probably due to the last update packages. I can't wait to see 
the isos on the mirrors.

Anyway, there has been a great experience help testing this distribution; for 
the first time I used cooker in the last moment (lather than RC2). So I know 
9.1 is a great distribution. 

I hope Mandrake will survive to this financial problems and we will have the 
oportunity to following testing future releases.

Congratulations and thanks for the experience!


El Miércoles, 19 de Marzo de 2003 00:02, Frederic Lepied escribió:
> 9.1 is gone to production. In the name of MandrakeSoft engineering
> team, I would like to thank all the cookers for the great help you
> provided to build this release. Thank you very much !

-- 
Francisco Alcaraz Ariza
Departamento de Biología Vegetal
Universidad de Murcia
E-30100 Murcia
España (Spain)



Re: [Cooker] 9.1 final

2003-03-18 Thread Hoyt Duff
On Tuesday 18 March 2003 09:57 pm, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
> > > And what do I do if I don't have an "old" kernel installed?  Punt?
> >
> > How about using mc to extract the kernel from the correct kernel rpm and
> > install it manually?
>
> rpm -Uvh --force?

I would do rpm -ivh --force, but it probably won't make any substantial 
difference. You could also probably rename the existing kernel binary and do 
a rpm -F and rpm would replace the missing kernel.

Linux -- so many ways to do the same things. I'm sure that emacs has a feature 
to accomplish this as well. 8)

-- 
Hoyt Duff
http://www.maximumhoyt.com/




Re: [Cooker] 9.1 final

2003-03-18 Thread Vincent Meyer, MD
btw - have iso's hit any mirrors yet? and if so where?

V.




Re: [Cooker] 9.1 final

2003-03-18 Thread Vincent Meyer, MD
Congradulations!  and thanks to everybody for their hard work creating an 
awsome distro!

Regards,

Vincent Meyer

On Tuesday 18 March 2003 06:02 pm, Frederic Lepied wrote:
> 9.1 is gone to production. In the name of MandrakeSoft engineering
> team, I would like to thank all the cookers for the great help you
> provided to build this release. Thank you very much !




Re: [Cooker] 9.1 final

2003-03-18 Thread Per Øyvind Karlsen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 19 March 2003 03:55, HoytDuff wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 March 2003 09:43 pm, Greg Meyer wrote:
> > And what do I do if I don't have an "old" kernel installed?  Punt?
>
> How about using mc to extract the kernel from the correct kernel rpm and
> install it manually?

rpm -Uvh --force?
- -- 
Regards,
Per Øyvind Karlsen
Sintrax Solutions
http://www.sintrax.net - +47 41681061
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+d9ytv8F7V9JOSuURAoImAJ9pWF0MQeI4OUfBks896M/sgGyGegCg0ViQ
9UmsVYAahsXoOFfDAa+wqDg=
=+/1H
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] 9.1 final

2003-03-18 Thread HoytDuff
On Tuesday 18 March 2003 09:43 pm, Greg Meyer wrote:
> And what do I do if I don't have an "old" kernel installed?  Punt?

How about using mc to extract the kernel from the correct kernel rpm and 
install it manually?

-- 
Hoyt
http://www.maximumhoyt.com

Run with scissors. Remove mattress tags. Top post. Be a rebel.



Re: [Cooker] 9.1 final

2003-03-18 Thread Greg Meyer
On Tuesday 18 March 2003 08:28 pm, Charles A Edwards wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Mar 2003 18:39:18 -0600
>
> Texstar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It appears to be a new kernel but rebuilt with the same number because
> > the byte count is different from the one I manually downloaded last
> > week and the new on on the cooker mirrors.  hmmm.
>
> And the Only rational and safe manner in which to install the 'new' -13
> kernel is to boot to an old kernel
> rpm -e kernel-source kernel-doc kernel-2.4.21.0.13mdk-1-1mdk
> and then install the 'new' -13 kernel pkgs.
>
> How is the DrakX going to handle this if the user has the 'old' -13
> kernel and the user is running the 9.1 installation as an upgrade?
>
And what do I do if I don't have an "old" kernel installed?  Punt?

-- 
Greg



Re: [Cooker] 9.1 final

2003-03-18 Thread Leon Brooks
On Wednesday 19 March 2003 07:58 am, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Erm, kernel 13mdk was originally released on 7th March, how can it have
> fixed a vuln discovered this morning?

Discovered? Or first widely announced?

Cheers; Leon




Re: [Cooker] 9.1 final

2003-03-18 Thread Clive Dove
On Tuesday 18 March 2003 20:28, Charles A Edwards wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Mar 2003 18:39:18 -0600
>
> Texstar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It appears to be a new kernel but rebuilt with the same number
> > because the byte count is different from the one I manually
> > downloaded last week and the new on on the cooker mirrors. 
> > hmmm.
>
> And the Only rational and safe manner in which to install the 'new'
> -13 kernel is to boot to an old kernel
> rpm -e kernel-source kernel-doc kernel-2.4.21.0.13mdk-1-1mdk
> and then install the 'new' -13 kernel pkgs.
>
> How is the DrakX going to handle this if the user has the 'old' -13
> kernel and the user is running the 9.1 installation as an upgrade?
>
>
> Charles

Reinstall the iso disks then upgrade?




Re: [Cooker] 9.1 final

2003-03-18 Thread Charles A Edwards
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003 18:39:18 -0600
Texstar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> It appears to be a new kernel but rebuilt with the same number because
> the byte count is different from the one I manually downloaded last
> week and the new on on the cooker mirrors.  hmmm.

And the Only rational and safe manner in which to install the 'new' -13
kernel is to boot to an old kernel
rpm -e kernel-source kernel-doc kernel-2.4.21.0.13mdk-1-1mdk
and then install the 'new' -13 kernel pkgs.

How is the DrakX going to handle this if the user has the 'old' -13
kernel and the user is running the 9.1 installation as an upgrade?


Charles

-- 
Corruption is not the #1 priority of the Police Commissioner.  His job
is to enforce the law and fight crime.
-- P.B.A. President E. J. Kiernan
-
Mandrake Linux 9.1 on PurpleDragon
Kernel- 2.4.21-0.13mdk
-


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [Cooker] 9.1 final

2003-03-18 Thread Texstar
On Tuesday 18 March 2003 06:23 pm, Adam Williamson wrote:
> My original message:
> > > Erm, kernel 13mdk was originally released on 7th March, how can it have
> > > fixed a vuln discovered this morning?
>
> ---
>
> Aurelien's reply:
>
> Because it was not discovered this morning. It was discovered days ago. But
> for security reasons, the vuln was not public until the major distributors
> had prepared and tested updates.
>
> Aurelien
>
> ---
>
> Jason's reply:
>
> It's 13.1-1, that's how. BUT, it seemed to break lots in my cooker, hope
> it doesn't on the release system.
>
> Cheers
>
> Jason
>
> ---
>
> Well, that's two entirely different explanations. Any more candidates?
> Hopefully from someone who actually *knows*? :)


It appears to be a new kernel but rebuilt with the same number because the 
byte count is different from the one I manually downloaded last week and the 
new on on the cooker mirrors.  hmmm.




Re: [Cooker] 9.1 final

2003-03-18 Thread Adam Williamson
My original message:

> > Erm, kernel 13mdk was originally released on 7th March, how can it have
> > fixed a vuln discovered this morning?

---

Aurelien's reply:

Because it was not discovered this morning. It was discovered days ago. But 
for security reasons, the vuln was not public until the major distributors 
had prepared and tested updates.

Aurelien

---

Jason's reply:

It's 13.1-1, that's how. BUT, it seemed to break lots in my cooker, hope
it doesn't on the release system.

Cheers

Jason

---

Well, that's two entirely different explanations. Any more candidates?
Hopefully from someone who actually *knows*? :)
-- 
adamw




Re: [Cooker] 9.1 final

2003-03-18 Thread Charles A Edwards
On Wed, 19 Mar 2003 12:10:53 +1200
Jason Greenwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> It's 13.1-1, that's how. BUT, it seemed to break lots in my cooker,
> hope it doesn't on the release system.


That's not how it is listed on the mirror

Sunsite.uio.no kernel-2.4.21.0.13mdk-1-1mdk.i586.rpm  2003.03.18
08:17:00

/home/charles/kernel-2.4.21.0.13mdk-1-1mdk.i586.rpm dl date March 8 2003

urpmi also sees it as the same and refuses to dl 


Charles

-- 
Why do we want intelligent terminals  when there are so many stupid
users?
-
Mandrake Linux 9.1 on PurpleDragon
Kernel- 2.4.21-0.13mdk
-


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [Cooker] 9.1 final

2003-03-18 Thread Aurélien Bompard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

> Erm, kernel 13mdk was originally released on 7th March, how can it have
> fixed a vuln discovered this morning?

Because it was not discovered this morning. It was discovered days ago. But 
for security reasons, the vuln was not public until the major distributors 
had prepared and tested updates.

Aurelien

- -- 

http://gauret.free.fr

  ,--.-'-,--.
  \  /-~-\  /
 / )' . . `( \
( (  ,---.  ) )
 \ `(_o_o_)' /
  \   `-'   /
   | |---| |
   [_]   [_]



There are only 10 types of people in the world:
those who understand binary and those who don't.



If you use envelopes, why not encryption ?

GPG key available on gauret.free.fr and www.keyserver.net

Key ID : 0x1B4259B3 
Fingerprint : 4832 1239 8C18 F5F3 C466  AE69 21A6 2396 1B42 59B3
(Note: The last 8 numbers in the fingerprint give the KeyID)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Key ID : 1B4259B3

iD8DBQE+d7cqIaYjlhtCWbMRAhgHAKCVhvXy2S95vjGp1+eC/Us39m7AOACgtdTq
sSjDFE7lOmrPey95c1WtBbE=
=BXpr
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] 9.1 final

2003-03-18 Thread Jason Greenwood
It's 13.1-1, that's how. BUT, it seemed to break lots in my cooker, hope 
it doesn't on the release system.

Cheers

Jason

Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 00:44, Till Kamppeter wrote:

Michael Scherer wrote:

Entête en cours de reécriture, merci de patienter en lisant la réponse au mail 
de Frederic Lepied, à Mercredi 19 Mars 2003 00:02



9.1 is gone to production. In the name of MandrakeSoft engineering
team, I would like to thank all the cookers for the great help you
provided to build this release. Thank you very much !


Well, this is great, but, I didn't see a new release of the kernel.

Can you please tell to me that the security hole discovered this morning is 
closed ?
Check your Cooker mirror whether it already caught up kernel 
2.4.21-0.13mdk. This is the fixed one. The Cooker on our compilation 
cluster is exactly 9.1 now, including this kernel. So update as soon as 
you r mirror gets the new kernel.

   Till


Erm, kernel 13mdk was originally released on 7th March, how can it have
fixed a vuln discovered this morning?




Re: [Cooker] 9.1 final

2003-03-18 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 00:44, Till Kamppeter wrote:
> Michael Scherer wrote:
> > Entête en cours de reécriture, merci de patienter en lisant la réponse au mail 
> > de Frederic Lepied, à Mercredi 19 Mars 2003 00:02
> > 
> > 
> >>9.1 is gone to production. In the name of MandrakeSoft engineering
> >>team, I would like to thank all the cookers for the great help you
> >>provided to build this release. Thank you very much !
> > 
> > 
> > Well, this is great, but, I didn't see a new release of the kernel.
> > 
> > Can you please tell to me that the security hole discovered this morning is 
> > closed ?
> 
> Check your Cooker mirror whether it already caught up kernel 
> 2.4.21-0.13mdk. This is the fixed one. The Cooker on our compilation 
> cluster is exactly 9.1 now, including this kernel. So update as soon as 
> you r mirror gets the new kernel.
> 
> Till

Erm, kernel 13mdk was originally released on 7th March, how can it have
fixed a vuln discovered this morning?
-- 
adamw




Re: [Cooker] 9.1 final

2003-03-18 Thread Sascha Noyes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Tuesday 18 March 2003 18:02, Frederic Lepied wrote:
> 9.1 is gone to production. In the name of MandrakeSoft engineering
> team, I would like to thank all the cookers for the great help you
> provided to build this release. Thank you very much !

Thanks everyone. Let me just say that this beta testing experience was really 
great with Bugzilla being formally used and all.

Sascha Noyes
- -- 
Please encrypt all correspondence.
PGP key available from:
http://individual.utoronto.ca/noyes/snoyes.asc
- --
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+d7GUgzJdfX+cTW8RAlruAJsFAHgpF7oAIQ/h07ToyLBXGV+hXQCeNj6H
/qmOKSg15O4fgxleVM98gPQ=
=xVHZ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] 9.1 final

2003-03-18 Thread Olivier Thauvin
Le Mercredi 19 Mars 2003 00:02, Frederic Lepied a écrit :
> 9.1 is gone to production. In the name of MandrakeSoft engineering
> team, I would like to thank all the cookers for the great help you
> provided to build this release. Thank you very much !

I am waiting iso and tree to build plf iso and I am a bit surprise  to don't 
see it on mirror. Warly said me it is in way, but can you clarify this 
situation for poeple who worked on it, and surelly waiting it.

I am not under pressure to use it myself, I run cooker, but I need it for two 
mandrake around project:
- plf
- easy urpmi (http://plf.zarb.org/~nanardon)
 
Thanks.
-- 
Linux pour Mac !? Enfin le moyen de transformer
une pomme en véritable ordinateur. - JL.
Olivier Thauvin - http://nanardon.homelinux.org/



Re: [Cooker] 9.1 final

2003-03-18 Thread Aurélien Bompard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Le Mercredi 19 Mars 2003 00:02, Frederic Lepied a écrit :
> 9.1 is gone to production. In the name of MandrakeSoft engineering
> team, I would like to thank all the cookers for the great help you
> provided to build this release. Thank you very much !

GREAT ! Ok this release is absolutely awesome. You guys (including the people 
on the mailing-list) did a fantastic job. I have never seen MandrakeSoft as 
active as the last few months (new book, opteron version, now a new 
release...)
I am deeply convinced that mandrake is going up very fast.

Congratulations to you all !!!


Aurélien

- -- 

http://gauret.free.fr

  ,--.-'-,--.
  \  /-~-\  /
 / )' . . `( \
( (  ,---.  ) )
 \ `(_o_o_)' /
  \   `-'   /
   | |---| |
   [_]   [_]



There are only 10 types of people in the world:
those who understand binary and those who don't.



If you use envelopes, why not encryption ?

GPG key available on gauret.free.fr and www.keyserver.net

Key ID : 0x1B4259B3 
Fingerprint : 4832 1239 8C18 F5F3 C466  AE69 21A6 2396 1B42 59B3
(Note: The last 8 numbers in the fingerprint give the KeyID)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Key ID : 1B4259B3

iD8DBQE+d7CQIaYjlhtCWbMRAiiVAKDA886h7uPJ8DqBSXUhQSIyK7HIdACfakKy
W325Rh3YW832QpA1xF4C6oY=
=NLX+
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] 9.1 final

2003-03-18 Thread Brook Humphrey
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Tuesday 18 March 2003 03:02 pm, Frederic Lepied wrote:
> 9.1 is gone to production. In the name of MandrakeSoft engineering
> team, I would like to thank all the cookers for the great help you
> provided to build this release. Thank you very much !
No to the contrary thank you.

- -- 
 -~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-
  Brook Humphrey   
Mobile PC Medic, 420 1st, Cheney, WA 99004, 509-235-9107
http://www.webmedic.net, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]   
 Holiness unto the Lord
 -~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+d62onT1TkA6FgPgRAhKFAKCDMSIVbY0VvSjwmdJlYIEwWo6i1ACeIlKx
/BtASC27qS7EnFU/pwS8k+I=
=L/cI
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] 9.1 final

2003-03-18 Thread Per Øyvind Karlsen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

g00dyg00dy

time to get drunk:>
...this weekend at least

On Wednesday 19 March 2003 00:02, Frederic Lepied wrote:
> 9.1 is gone to production. In the name of MandrakeSoft engineering
> team, I would like to thank all the cookers for the great help you
> provided to build this release. Thank you very much !

- -- 
Regards,
Per Øyvind Karlsen
Sintrax Solutions
http://www.sintrax.net - +47 41681061
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+d6yFv8F7V9JOSuURAoumAKDYkgr3IWVLfCmgrJEExjssv/r91QCeL/r9
awlfKK8NL2lViJvKk2LjauE=
=ZUAi
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] 9.1 final

2003-03-18 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2003-03-18 at 23:02, Frederic Lepied wrote:
> 9.1 is gone to production. In the name of MandrakeSoft engineering
> team, I would like to thank all the cookers for the great help you
> provided to build this release. Thank you very much !

Awesome, congrats to all the MDK guys! This should be a kickass release
:). So when will the images hit mirrors?
-- 
adamw




Re: [Cooker] 9.1 final

2003-03-18 Thread Michael Scherer
Entête en cours de reécriture, merci de patienter en lisant la réponse au mail 
de Frederic Lepied, à Mercredi 19 Mars 2003 00:02

> 9.1 is gone to production. In the name of MandrakeSoft engineering
> team, I would like to thank all the cookers for the great help you
> provided to build this release. Thank you very much !

Well, this is great, but, I didn't see a new release of the kernel.

Can you please tell to me that the security hole discovered this morning is 
closed ?


-- 

Mickaël Scherer




Re: [Cooker] 9.1 final

2003-03-18 Thread denis
Go on Boy ! Champagne and installation party will begin !

Bravo les gars, et une de plus !

9.1 is gone to production. In the name of MandrakeSoft engineering
team, I would like to thank all the cookers for the great help you
provided to build this release. Thank you very much !





Re: [Cooker] 9.1 final

2003-03-18 Thread Jason Greenwood
Here Here!! Go Mandrake!!

You guys are awesome, both the developers and all my fellow cookers. 
Long Live Mandrake!!

Jason Komar wrote:
On Tue, 2003-03-18 at 16:02, Frederic Lepied wrote:

9.1 is gone to production. In the name of MandrakeSoft engineering
team, I would like to thank all the cookers for the great help you
provided to build this release. Thank you very much !


Congratulations! I hope this release solidifies the beginning of a long
and profitable future for Mandrake.
Cheers,




RE: [Cooker] 9.1 final

2003-03-18 Thread MEISCH,CORY (HP-Vancouver,ex1)
Whoo Hoo!

-Original Message-
From: Frederic Lepied [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 3:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Cooker] 9.1 final


9.1 is gone to production. In the name of MandrakeSoft engineering team, I
would like to thank all the cookers for the great help you provided to build
this release. Thank you very much !
-- 
Fred - May the source be with you



Re: [Cooker] 9.1 final

2003-03-18 Thread Jason Komar
On Tue, 2003-03-18 at 16:02, Frederic Lepied wrote:
> 9.1 is gone to production. In the name of MandrakeSoft engineering
> team, I would like to thank all the cookers for the great help you
> provided to build this release. Thank you very much !

Congratulations! I hope this release solidifies the beginning of a long
and profitable future for Mandrake.

Cheers,
-- 
Jason Komar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lubetec




[Cooker] 9.1 final

2003-03-18 Thread Frederic Lepied
9.1 is gone to production. In the name of MandrakeSoft engineering
team, I would like to thank all the cookers for the great help you
provided to build this release. Thank you very much !
-- 
Fred - May the source be with you